Amazon rainforest

The Amazon rainforest,[lower-alpha 1] alternatively, the Amazon Jungle, also known in English as Amazonia, is a moist broadleaf tropical rainforest in the Amazon biome that covers most of the Amazon basin of South America. This basin encompasses 7,000,000 km2 (2,700,000 sq mi), of which 5,500,000 km2 (2,100,000 sq mi) are covered by the rainforest. This region includes territory belonging to nine nations.

"The Amazon" and "Amazonia" redirect here. For the river, see Amazon River. For other uses, see Amazon and Amazonia (disambiguation).

Amazon rainforest
Portuguese: Floresta amazônica
Spanish: Selva amazónica
Amazon rainforest, near Manaus, Brazil
Geography
Map of the Amazon rainforest ecoregions as delineated by the WWF in white[1] and the Amazon drainage basin in blue.
LocationBrazil, Peru, Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Guyana, Suriname, France (French Guiana)
Coordinates
Area5,500,000 km2 (2,100,000 sq mi)

The majority of the forest is contained within Brazil, with 60% of the rainforest, followed by Peru with 13%, Colombia with 10%, and with minor amounts in Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Guyana, Suriname and French Guiana. Four nations have "Amazonas" as the name of one of their first-level administrative regions and France uses the name "Guiana Amazonian Park" for its rainforest protected area. The Amazon represents over half of the planet's remaining rainforests,[2] and comprises the largest and most biodiverse tract of tropical rainforest in the world, with an estimated 390 billion individual trees divided into 16,000 species.[3]

Etymology

The name Amazon is said to arise from a war Francisco de Orellana fought with the Tapuyas and other tribes. The women of the tribe fought alongside the men, as was their custom.[4] Orellana derived the name Amazonas from the Amazons of Greek mythology, described by Herodotus and Diodorus.[4]

History
See also: History of South America § Amazon, and Amazon River § History

Tribal societies are well capable of escalation to all-out wars between tribes. Thus, in the Amazonas, there was perpetual animosity between the neighboring tribes of the Jivaro. Several tribes of the Jivaroan group, including the Shuar, practised headhunting for trophies and headshrinking.[5] The accounts of missionaries to the area in the borderlands between Brazil and Venezuela have recounted constant infighting in the Yanomami tribes. More than a third of the Yanomamo males, on average, died from warfare.[6]

During the Amazon rubber boom it is estimated that diseases brought by immigrants, such as typhus and malaria, killed 40,000 native Amazonians.[7]

Geography

Location

Nine countries share the Amazon basin—most of the rainforest, 58.4%, is contained within the borders of Brazil. The other eight countries include Peru with 12.8%, Bolivia with 7.7%, Colombia with 7.1%, Venezuela with 6.1%, Guyana with 3.1%, Suriname with 2.5%, French Guyana with 1.4%, and Ecuador with 1%.[8]

Natural
Aerial view of the Amazon rainforest, near Manaus

The rainforest likely formed during the Eocene era (from 56 million years to 33.9 million years ago). It appeared following a global reduction of tropical temperatures when the Atlantic Ocean had widened sufficiently to provide a warm, moist climate to the Amazon basin. The rainforest has been in existence for at least 55 million years, and most of the region remained free of savanna-type biomes at least until the current ice age when the climate was drier and savanna more widespread.[9][10]

Following the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, the extinction of the dinosaurs and the wetter climate may have allowed the tropical rainforest to spread out across the continent. From 66–34 Mya, the rainforest extended as far south as 45°. Climate fluctuations during the last 34 million years have allowed savanna regions to expand into the tropics. During the Oligocene, for example, the rainforest spanned a relatively narrow band. It expanded again during the Middle Miocene, then retracted to a mostly inland formation at the last glacial maximum.[11] However, the rainforest still managed to thrive during these glacial periods, allowing for the survival and evolution of a broad diversity of species.[12]

Aerial view of the Amazon rainforest

During the mid-Eocene, it is believed that the drainage basin of the Amazon was split along the middle of the continent by the Purus Arch. Water on the eastern side flowed toward the Atlantic, while to the west water flowed toward the Pacific across the Amazonas Basin. As the Andes Mountains rose, however, a large basin was created that enclosed a lake; now known as the Solimões Basin. Within the last 5–10 million years, this accumulating water broke through the Purus Arch, joining the easterly flow toward the Atlantic.[13][14]

There is evidence that there have been significant changes in the Amazon rainforest vegetation over the last 21,000 years through the last glacial maximum (LGM) and subsequent deglaciation. Analyses of sediment deposits from Amazon basin paleolakes and the Amazon Fan indicate that rainfall in the basin during the LGM was lower than for the present, and this was almost certainly associated with reduced moist tropical vegetation cover in the basin.[15] There is a debate, however, over how extensive this reduction was. Some scientists argue that the rainforest was reduced to small, isolated refugia separated by open forest and grassland;[16] other scientists argue that the rainforest remained largely intact but extended less far to the north, south, and east than is seen today.[17] This debate has proved difficult to resolve because the practical limitations of working in the rainforest mean that data sampling is biased away from the center of the Amazon basin, and both explanations are reasonably well supported by the available data.

Sahara Desert dust windblown to the Amazon

More than 56% of the dust fertilizing the Amazon rainforest comes from the Bodélé depression in Northern Chad in the Sahara desert. The dust contains phosphorus, important for plant growth. The yearly Sahara dust replaces the equivalent amount of phosphorus washed away yearly in Amazon soil from rains and floods.[18]

NASA's CALIPSO satellite has measured the amount of dust transported by wind from the Sahara to the Amazon: an average 182 million tons of dust are windblown out of the Sahara each year, at 15 degrees west longitude, across 2,600 km (1,600 mi) over the Atlantic Ocean (some dust falls into the Atlantic), then at 35 degrees West longitude at the eastern coast of South America, 27.7 million tons (15%) of dust fall over the Amazon basin (22 million tons of it consisting of phosphorus), 132 million tons of dust remain in the air, 43 million tons of dust are windblown and falls on the Caribbean Sea, past 75 degrees west longitude.[19]

CALIPSO uses a laser range finder to scan the Earth's atmosphere for the vertical distribution of dust and other aerosols. CALIPSO regularly tracks the Sahara-Amazon dust plume. CALIPSO has measured variations in the dust amounts transported – an 86 percent drop between the highest amount of dust transported in 2007 and the lowest in 2011.

A possibility causing the variation is the Sahel, a strip of semi-arid land on the southern border of the Sahara. When rain amounts in the Sahel are higher, the volume of dust is lower. The higher rainfall could make more vegetation grow in the Sahel, leaving less sand exposed to winds to blow away.[20]

Amazon phosphorus also comes as smoke due to biomass burning in Africa.[21][22]

Human activity
Manaus, with 1.8 million inhabitants, is the largest city in the Amazon basin
The Yanomami are a group of approximately 32,000 indigenous people who live in the Amazon rainforest.[23]
Members of an uncontacted tribe encountered in the Brazilian state of Acre in 2009

Based on archaeological evidence from an excavation at Caverna da Pedra Pintada, human inhabitants first settled in the Amazon region at least 11,200 years ago.[24] Subsequent development led to late-prehistoric settlements along the periphery of the forest by AD 1250, which induced alterations in the forest cover.[25]

For a long time, it was thought that the Amazon rainforest was never more than sparsely populated, as it was impossible to sustain a large population through agriculture given the poor soil. Archeologist Betty Meggers was a prominent proponent of this idea, as described in her book Amazonia: Man and Culture in a Counterfeit Paradise. She claimed that a population density of 0.2 inhabitants per square kilometre (0.52/sq mi) is the maximum that can be sustained in the rainforest through hunting, with agriculture needed to host a larger population.[26] However, recent anthropological findings have suggested that the region was actually densely populated. Some 5 million people may have lived in the Amazon region in AD 1500, divided between dense coastal settlements, such as that at Marajó, and inland dwellers.[27] By 1900, the population had fallen to 1 million and by the early 1980s it was less than 200,000.[27]

The first European to travel the length of the Amazon River was Francisco de Orellana in 1542.[28] The BBC's Unnatural Histories presents evidence that Orellana, rather than exaggerating his claims as previously thought, was correct in his observations that a complex civilization was flourishing along the Amazon in the 1540s. It is believed that civilization was later devastated by the spread of diseases from Europe, such as smallpox.[29]. This civilization was investigated by the British explorer Percy Fawcett in the early twentieth century. The results of his expeditions were inconclusive and he disappeared mysteriously on his last trip. His name for this lost civilization was the City of Z.

Since the 1970s, numerous geoglyphs have been discovered on deforested land dating between AD 1–1250, furthering claims about Pre-Columbian civilizations.[30][31] Ondemar Dias is accredited with first discovering the geoglyphs in 1977, and Alceu Ranzi is credited with furthering their discovery after flying over Acre.[29][32] The BBC's Unnatural Histories presented evidence that the Amazon rainforest, rather than being a pristine wilderness, has been shaped by man for at least 11,000 years through practices such as forest gardening and terra preta.[29] Terra preta is found over large areas in the Amazon forest; and is now widely accepted as a product of indigenous soil management. The development of this fertile soil allowed agriculture and silviculture in the previously hostile environment; meaning that large portions of the Amazon rainforest are probably the result of centuries of human management, rather than naturally occurring as has previously been supposed.[33] In the region of the Xingu tribe, remains of some of these large settlements in the middle of the Amazon forest were found in 2003 by Michael Heckenberger and colleagues of the University of Florida. Among those were evidence of roads, bridges and large plazas.[34]

Biodiversity
Scarlet macaw, which is indigenous to the American tropics.
Deforestation in the Amazon rainforest threatens many species of tree frogs, which are very sensitive to environmental changes (pictured: giant leaf frog)
A giant, bundled liana in western Brazil

Wet tropical forests are the most species-rich biome, and tropical forests in the Americas are consistently more species rich than the wet forests in Africa and Asia.[35] As the largest tract of tropical rainforest in the Americas, the Amazonian rainforests have unparalleled biodiversity. One in ten known species in the world lives in the Amazon rainforest.[36] This constitutes the largest collection of living plants and animal species in the world.

The region is home to about 2.5 million insect species,[37] tens of thousands of plants, and some 2,000 birds and mammals. To date, at least 40,000 plant species, 2,200 fishes,[38] 1,294 birds, 427 mammals, 428 amphibians, and 378 reptiles have been scientifically classified in the region.[39] One in five of all bird species are found in the Amazon rainforest, and one in five of the fish species live in Amazonian rivers and streams. Scientists have described between 96,660 and 128,843 invertebrate species in Brazil alone.[40]

The biodiversity of plant species is the highest on Earth with one 2001 study finding a quarter square kilometer (62 acres) of Ecuadorian rainforest supports more than 1,100 tree species.[41] A study in 1999 found one square kilometer (247 acres) of Amazon rainforest can contain about 90,790 tonnes of living plants. The average plant biomass is estimated at 356 ± 47 tonnes per hectare.[42] To date, an estimated 438,000 species of plants of economic and social interest have been registered in the region with many more remaining to be discovered or catalogued.[43] The total number of tree species in the region is estimated at 16,000.[3]

The green leaf area of plants and trees in the rainforest varies by about 25% as a result of seasonal changes. Leaves expand during the dry season when sunlight is at a maximum, then undergo abscission in the cloudy wet season. These changes provide a balance of carbon between photosynthesis and respiration.[44]

The rainforest contains several species that can pose a hazard. Among the largest predatory creatures are the black caiman, jaguar, cougar, and anaconda. In the river, electric eels can produce an electric shock that can stun or kill, while piranha are known to bite and injure humans.[45] Various species of poison dart frogs secrete lipophilic alkaloid toxins through their flesh. There are also numerous parasites and disease vectors. Vampire bats dwell in the rainforest and can spread the rabies virus.[46] Malaria, yellow fever and dengue fever can also be contracted in the Amazon region.

Deforestation
Deforestation in the Maranhão state of Brazil, 2016
Main articles: Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest, Trans-Amazonian highway, and Trans-Amazonian Railway

Deforestation is the conversion of forested areas to non-forested areas. The main sources of deforestation in the Amazon are human settlement and development of the land.[47] In 2018, about 17% of the Amazon rainforest was already destroyed. Research suggests that upon reaching about 20–25% (hence 3–8% more), the tipping point to flip it into a non-forest ecosystems – degraded savannah – (in eastern, southern and central Amazonia) will be reached.[48][49]

Prior to the early 1960s, access to the forest's interior was highly restricted, and the forest remained basically intact.[50] Farms established during the 1960s were based on crop cultivation and the slash and burn method. However, the colonists were unable to manage their fields and the crops because of the loss of soil fertility and weed invasion.[51] The soils in the Amazon are productive for just a short period of time, so farmers are constantly moving to new areas and clearing more land.[51] These farming practices led to deforestation and caused extensive environmental damage.[52] Deforestation is considerable, and areas cleared of forest are visible to the naked eye from outer space.

In the 1970s, construction began on the Trans-Amazonian highway. This highway represented a major threat to the Amazon rainforest.[53] The highway still has not been completed, limiting the environmental damage.

Wildfires in Brazil's indigenous territory, 2017

Between 1991 and 2000, the total area of forest lost in the Amazon rose from 415,000 to 587,000 km2 (160,000 to 227,000 sq mi), with most of the lost forest becoming pasture for cattle.[54] Seventy percent of formerly forested land in the Amazon, and 91% of land deforested since 1970, have been used for livestock pasture.[55][56] Currently, Brazil is the second-largest global producer of soybeans after the United States. New research however, conducted by Leydimere Oliveira et al., has shown that the more rainforest is logged in the Amazon, the less precipitation reaches the area and so the lower the yield per hectare becomes. So despite the popular perception, there has been no economical advantage for Brazil from logging rainforest zones and converting these to pastoral fields.[57]

Indigenous protesters from Vale do Javari

The needs of soy farmers have been used to justify many of the controversial transportation projects that are currently developing in the Amazon. The first two highways successfully opened up the rainforest and led to increased settlement and deforestation. The mean annual deforestation rate from 2000 to 2005 (22,392 km2 or 8,646 sq mi per year) was 18% higher than in the previous five years (19,018 km2 or 7,343 sq mi per year).[58] Although deforestation declined significantly in the Brazilian Amazon between 2004 and 2014, there has been an increase to the present day.[59]

Since the discovery of fossil fuel reservoirs in the Amazon rainforest, oil drilling activity has steadily increased, peaking in the Western Amazon in the 1970s and ushering another drilling boom in the 2000s.[60] As oil companies have to set up their operations by opening roads through forests, which often contributes to deforestation in the region.[61]

The European Union–Mercosur free trade agreement, which would form one of the world's largest free trade areas, has been denounced by environmental activists and indigenous rights campaigners.[62] The fear is that the deal could lead to more deforestation of the Amazon rainforest as it expands market access to Brazilian beef.[63]

2019 fires
Main article: 2019 Amazon rainforest wildfires

There have been 72,843 fires in Brazil in 2019, with more than half within the Amazon region.[64][65][66] In August 2019 there were a record number of fires.[67] Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon rose more than 88% in June 2019 compared with the same month in 2018.[68]

  • NASA satellite observation of deforestation in the Mato Grosso state of Brazil. The transformation from forest to farm is evident by the paler square shaped areas under development.
  • Fires and deforestation in the state of Rondônia
  • One consequence of forest clearing in the Amazon: thick smoke that hangs over the forest
  • Impact of deforestation on natural habitat of trees

Conservation and climate change
See also: Gaviotas
Amazon rainforest

Environmentalists are concerned about loss of biodiversity that will result from destruction of the forest, and also about the release of the carbon contained within the vegetation, which could accelerate global warming. Amazonian evergreen forests account for about 10% of the world's terrestrial primary productivity and 10% of the carbon stores in ecosystems[69] – of the order of 1.1 × 1011 metric tonnes of carbon.[70] Amazonian forests are estimated to have accumulated 0.62 ± 0.37 tons of carbon per hectare per year between 1975 and 1996.[70]

One computer model of future climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions shows that the Amazon rainforest could become unsustainable under conditions of severely reduced rainfall and increased temperatures, leading to an almost complete loss of rainforest cover in the basin by 2100.[71][72] However, simulations of Amazon basin climate change across many different models are not consistent in their estimation of any rainfall response, ranging from weak increases to strong decreases.[73] The result indicates that the rainforest could be threatened though the 21st century by climate change in addition to deforestation.

In 1989, environmentalist C.M. Peters and two colleagues stated there is economic as well as biological incentive to protecting the rainforest. One hectare in the Peruvian Amazon has been calculated to have a value of $6820 if intact forest is sustainably harvested for fruits, latex, and timber; $1000 if clear-cut for commercial timber (not sustainably harvested); or $148 if used as cattle pasture.[74]

A map of uncontacted tribes, around the start of the 21st century

As indigenous territories continue to be destroyed by deforestation and ecocide, such as in the Peruvian Amazon[75] indigenous peoples' rainforest communities continue to disappear, while others, like the Urarina continue to struggle to fight for their cultural survival and the fate of their forested territories. Meanwhile, the relationship between non-human primates in the subsistence and symbolism of indigenous lowland South American peoples has gained increased attention, as have ethno-biology and community-based conservation efforts.

From 2002 to 2006, the conserved land in the Amazon rainforest almost tripled and deforestation rates dropped up to 60%. About 1,000,000 km2 (250,000,000 acres) have been put onto some sort of conservation, which adds up to a current amount of 1,730,000 km2 (430,000,000 acres).[76]

In April 2019, the Ecuadorian court stopped oil exploration activities in 180,000 hectares (440,000 acres) of the Amazon rainforest.[77]

In July 2019, the Ecuadorian court forbade the government to sell territory with forests to oil companies.[78] In September 2019, the US and Brazil agreed to promote private-sector development in the Amazon. They also pledged a $100m biodiversity conservation fund for the Amazon led by the private sector. Brazil's foreign minister stated that opening the rain-forest to economic development was the only way to protect it.[79]

  • Anthropogenic emission of greenhouse gases broken down by sector for the year 2000.
  • Aerosols over the Amazon each September for four burning seasons (2005 through 2008). The aerosol scale (yellow to dark reddish-brown) indicates the relative amount of particles that absorb sunlight.
  • Aerial roots of red mangrove on an Amazonian river.

A 2009 study found that a 4 °C rise (above pre-industrial levels) in global temperatures by 2100 would kill 85% of the Amazon rainforest while a temperature rise of 3 °C would kill some 75% of the Amazon.[80]

Deforestation in the Amazon rainforest region has a negative impact on local climate.[81] It was one of the main causes of the severe drought of 2014–2015 in Brazil.[82][83] This is because the moisture from the forests is important to the rainfall in Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina. Half of the rainfall in the Amazon area is produced by the forests.[84]

Remote sensing
This image reveals how the forest and the atmosphere interact to create a uniform layer of "popcorn-shaped" cumulus clouds.

The use of remotely sensed data is dramatically improving conservationists' knowledge of the Amazon basin. Given the objectivity and lowered costs of satellite-based land cover analysis, it appears likely that remote sensing technology will be an integral part of assessing the extent and damage of deforestation in the basin.[85] Furthermore, remote sensing is the best and perhaps only possible way to study the Amazon on a large scale.[86]

The use of remote sensing for the conservation of the Amazon is also being used by the indigenous tribes of the basin to protect their tribal lands from commercial interests. Using handheld GPS devices and programs like Google Earth, members of the Trio Tribe, who live in the rainforests of southern Suriname, map out their ancestral lands to help strengthen their territorial claims.[87] Currently, most tribes in the Amazon do not have clearly defined boundaries, making it easier for commercial ventures to target their territories.

To accurately map the Amazon's biomass and subsequent carbon related emissions, the classification of tree growth stages within different parts of the forest is crucial. In 2006, Tatiana Kuplich organized the trees of the Amazon into four categories: mature forest, regenerating forest [less than three years], regenerating forest [between three and five years of regrowth], and regenerating forest [eleven to eighteen years of continued development].[88] The researcher used a combination of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and Thematic Mapper (TM) to accurately place the different portions of the Amazon into one of the four classifications.

Impact of early 21st-century Amazon droughts

In 2005, parts of the Amazon basin experienced the worst drought in one hundred years,[89] and there were indications that 2006 may have been a second successive year of drought.[90] A 23 July 2006 article in the UK newspaper The Independent reported the Woods Hole Research Center results, showing that the forest in its present form could survive only three years of drought.[91][92] Scientists at the Brazilian National Institute of Amazonian Research argued in the article that this drought response, coupled with the effects of deforestation on regional climate, are pushing the rainforest towards a "tipping point" where it would irreversibly start to die.[93] It concluded that the forest is on the brink of being turned into savanna or desert, with catastrophic consequences for the world's climate.

According to the World Wide Fund for Nature, the combination of climate change and deforestation increases the drying effect of dead trees that fuels forest fires.[94]

In 2010, the Amazon rainforest experienced another severe drought, in some ways more extreme than the 2005 drought. The affected region was approximately 3,000,000 km2 (1,160,000 sq mi) of rainforest, compared with 1,900,000 km2 (734,000 sq mi) in 2005. The 2010 drought had three epicenters where vegetation died off, whereas in 2005, the drought was focused on the southwestern part. The findings were published in the journal Science. In a typical year, the Amazon absorbs 1.5 gigatons of carbon dioxide; during 2005 instead 5 gigatons were released and in 2010 8 gigatons were released.[95][96] Additional severe droughts occurred in 2010, 2015, and 2016.[97]

In 2019 Brazil's protections of the Amazon rainforest were slashed, resulting in a severe loss of trees.[98] According to Brazil's National Institute for Space Research (INPE), deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon rose more than 50% in the first three months of 2020 compared to the same three-month period in 2019.[99]

In 2020, a 17 per cent rise was noted in the Amazon wildfires, marking the worst start to the fire season in a decade. The first 10 days of August 2020 witnessed 10,136 fires. An analysis of the government figures reflected 81 per cent increase in fires in federal reserves, in comparison with the same period in 2019.[100] However, President Jair Bolsonaro turned down the existence of fires, calling it a “lie”, despite the data produced by his own government.[101]

gollark: Your function WILL be transformed into irrelevancy.
gollark: Deploying countermatrices.
gollark: Actually, our functions are shielded and merely reflect incoming lasers in the line y = 10 + |x|.
gollark: If it worked, of course; the function is filled with embedded contraapioforms.
gollark: That would just give you an apiaristic version of the original function.

See also

Notes and references
  1. Portuguese: Floresta amazônica or Amazônia; Spanish: Selva amazónica, Amazonía or usually Amazonia; French: Forêt amazonienne; Dutch: Amazoneregenwoud
  1. WWF - About the Amazon
  2. "WNF: Places: Amazon". Retrieved June 4, 2016.
  3. "Field Museum scientists estimate 16,000 tree species in the Amazon". Field Museum. October 17, 2013. Retrieved October 18, 2013.
  4. Taylor, Isaac (1898). Names and Their Histories: A Handbook of Historical Geography and Topographical Nomenclature. London: Rivingtons. ISBN 978-0-559-29668-0. Retrieved October 12, 2008.
  5. "The Amazon's head hunters and body shrinkers". The Week. January 20, 2012.
  6. Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1992). Yanomamo. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  7. La Republica Oligarchic. Editorial Lexus 2000 p. 925.
  8. Coca-Castro, Alejandro; Reymondin, Louis; Bellfield, Helen; Hyman, Glenn (January 2013), Land use Status and Trends in Amazonia (PDF), Amazonia Security Agenda Project, archived from the original (PDF) on March 19, 2016, retrieved August 25, 2019
  9. Morley, Robert J. (2000). Origin and Evolution of Tropical Rain Forests. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-98326-2.
  10. Burnham, Robyn J.; Johnson, Kirk R. (2004). "South American palaeobotany and the origins of neotropical rainforests". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 359 (1450): 1595–1610. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1531. PMC 1693437. PMID 15519975.
  11. Maslin, Mark; Malhi, Yadvinder; Phillips, Oliver; Cowling, Sharon (2005). "New views on an old forest: assessing the longevity, resilience and future of the Amazon rainforest" (PDF). Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 30 (4): 477–499. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00181.x. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 1, 2008. Retrieved September 25, 2008.
  12. Malhi, Yadvinder; Phillips, Oliver (2005). Tropical Forests & Global Atmospheric Change. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-856706-6.
  13. Costa, João Batista Sena; Bemerguy, Ruth Léa; Hasui, Yociteru; Borges, Maurício da Silva (2001). "Tectonics and paleogeography along the Amazon river". Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 14 (4): 335–347. Bibcode:2001JSAES..14..335C. doi:10.1016/S0895-9811(01)00025-6.
  14. Milani, Edison José; Zalán, Pedro Victor (1999). "An outline of the geology and petroleum systems of the Paleozoic interior basins of South America" (PDF). Episodes. 22 (3): 199–205. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/1999/v22i3/007. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 1, 2008. Retrieved September 25, 2008.
  15. Colinvaux, Paul A.; Oliveira, Paulo E. De (2000). "Palaeoecology and climate of the Amazon basin during the last glacial cycle". Journal of Quaternary Science. 15 (4): 347–356. Bibcode:2000JQS....15..347C. doi:10.1002/1099-1417(200005)15:4<347::AID-JQS537>3.0.CO;2-A.
  16. Van Der Hammen, Thomas; Hooghiemstra, Henry (2000). "Neogene and Quaternary history of vegetation, climate, and plant diversity in Amazonia". Quaternary Science Reviews. 19 (8): 725. Bibcode:2000QSRv...19..725V. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.536.519. doi:10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00024-4.
  17. Colinvaux, P.A.; De Oliveira, P.E.; Bush, M.B. (January 2000). "Amazonian and neotropical plant communities on glacial time-scales: The failure of the aridity and refuge hypotheses". Quaternary Science Reviews. 19 (1–5): 141–169. Bibcode:2000QSRv...19..141C. doi:10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00059-1.
  18. Yu, Hongbin (2015). "The fertilizing role of African dust in the Amazon rainforest: A first multiyear assessment based on data from Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations". Geophysical Research Letters. 42 (6): 1984–1991. Bibcode:2015GeoRL..42.1984Y. doi:10.1002/2015GL063040.
  19. Garner, Rob (February 24, 2015). "Saharan Dust Feeds Amazon's Plants". NASA.
  20. "Desert Dust Feeds Amazon Forests – NASA Science". nasa.gov.
  21. Barkley, Anne E.; Prospero, Joseph M.; Mahowald, Natalie; Hamilton, Douglas S.; Popendorf, Kimberly J.; Oehlert, Amanda M.; Pourmand, Ali; Gatineau, Alexandre; Panechou-Pulcherie, Kathy; Blackwelder, Patricia; Gaston, Cassandra J. (August 13, 2019). "African biomass burning is a substantial source of phosphorus deposition to the Amazon, Tropical Atlantic Ocean, and Southern Ocean". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116 (33): 16216–16221. doi:10.1073/pnas.1906091116. PMC 6697889. PMID 31358622.
  22. "Smoke from Africa fertilizes the Amazon and tropical ocean regions with soluble phosphorous". phys.org.
  23. "Yanomami". Encyclopaedia Britannica.
  24. Roosevelt, A.C.; da Costa, M. Lima; Machado, C. Lopes; Michab, M.; Mercier, N.; Valladas, H.; Feathers, J.; Barnett, W.; da Silveira, M. Imazio; Henderson, A.; Sliva, J.; Chernoff, B.; Reese, D.S.; Holman, J.A.; Toth, N.; Schick, K. (April 19, 1996). "Paleoindian Cave Dwellers in the Amazon: The Peopling of the Americas". Science. 272 (5260): 373–384. Bibcode:1996Sci...272..373R. doi:10.1126/science.272.5260.373.
  25. Heckenberger, Michael J.; Kuikuro, Afukaka; Kuikuro, Urissapá Tabata; Russell, J. Christian; Schmidt, Morgan; Fausto, Carlos; Franchetto, Bruna (September 19, 2003). "Amazonia 1492: Pristine Forest or Cultural Parkland?". Science. 301 (5640): 1710–1714. Bibcode:2003Sci...301.1710H. doi:10.1126/science.1086112. PMID 14500979. S2CID 7962308.
  26. Meggers, Betty J. (December 19, 2003). "Revisiting Amazonia Circa 1492". Science. 302 (5653): 2067–2070. doi:10.1126/science.302.5653.2067b. PMID 14684803.
  27. Chris C. Park (2003). Tropical Rainforests. Routledge. p. 108. ISBN 978-0-415-06239-8.
  28. Smith, A (1994). Explorers of the Amazon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-76337-8.
  29. "Unnatural Histories – Amazon". BBC Four.
  30. Simon Romero (January 14, 2012). "Once Hidden by Forest, Carvings in Land Attest to Amazon's Lost World". The New York Times.
  31. Martti Pärssinen; Denise Schaan; Alceu Ranzi (2009). "Pre-Columbian geometric earthworks in the upper Purús: a complex society in western Amazonia". Antiquity. 83 (322): 1084–1095. doi:10.1017/s0003598x00099373. S2CID 55741813.
  32. Junior, Gonçalo (October 2008). "Amazonia lost and found". Pesquisa (Ed.220). Archived from the original on August 12, 2014.
  33. The influence of human alteration has been generally underestimated, reports Darna L. Dufour: "Much of what has been considered natural forest in Amazonia is probably the result of hundreds of years of human use and management." "Use of Tropical Rainforests by Native Amazonians," BioScience 40, no. 9 (October 1990):658. For an example of how such peoples integrated planting into their nomadic lifestyles, see Rival, Laura (1993). "The Growth of Family Trees: Understanding Huaorani Perceptions of the Forest". Man. 28 (4): 635–652. doi:10.2307/2803990. JSTOR 2803990.
  34. Heckenberger, M.J.; Kuikuro, A; Kuikuro, UT; Russell, JC; Schmidt, M; Fausto, C; Franchetto, B (September 19, 2003), "Amazonia 1492: Pristine Forest or Cultural Parkland?", Science (published 2003), 301 (5640), pp. 1710–14, Bibcode:2003Sci...301.1710H, doi:10.1126/science.1086112, PMID 14500979, S2CID 7962308
  35. Turner, I.M. (2001). The ecology of trees in the tropical rain forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 0-521-80183-4
  36. "Amazon Rainforest, Amazon Plants, Amazon River Animals". World Wide Fund for Nature. Archived from the original on May 17, 2008. Retrieved May 6, 2008.
  37. "Photos / Pictures of the Amazon Rainforest". Travel.mongabay.com. Archived from the original on December 17, 2008. Retrieved December 18, 2008.
  38. James S. Albert; Roberto E. Reis (March 8, 2011). Historical Biogeography of Neotropical Freshwater Fishes. University of California Press. p. 308. Archived from the original on June 30, 2011. Retrieved June 28, 2011.
  39. Da Silva; Jose Maria Cardoso; et al. (2005). "The Fate of the Amazonian Areas of Endemism". Conservation Biology. 19 (3): 689–694. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00705.x.
  40. Lewinsohn, Thomas M.; Paulo Inácio Prado (June 2005). "How Many Species Are There in Brazil?". Conservation Biology. 19 (3): 619–624. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00680.x.
  41. Wright, S. Joseph (October 12, 2001). "Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence". Oecologia. 130 (1): 1–14. Bibcode:2002Oecol.130....1W. doi:10.1007/s004420100809. PMID 28547014.
  42. Laurance, William F.; Fearnside, Philip M.; Laurance, Susan G.; Delamonica, Patricia; Lovejoy, Thomas E.; Rankin-de Merona, Judy M.; Chambers, Jeffrey Q.; Gascon, Claude (June 14, 1999). "Relationship between soils and Amazon forest biomass: a landscape-scale study". Forest Ecology and Management. 118 (1–3): 127–138. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00494-0.
  43. "Amazon Rainforest". South AmericaTravel Guide. Archived from the original on August 12, 2008. Retrieved August 19, 2008.
  44. Mynenia, Ranga B.; et al. (March 13, 2007). "Large seasonal swings in leaf area of Amazon rainforests". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (12): 4820–4823. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.4820M. doi:10.1073/pnas.0611338104. PMC 1820882. PMID 17360360.
  45. "Piranha 'less deadly than feared'". BBC News. July 2, 2007. Archived from the original on July 7, 2007. Retrieved July 2, 2007.
  46. da Rosa; Elizabeth S. T.; et al. (August 2006). "Bat-transmitted Human Rabies Outbreaks, Brazilian Amazon". Emerging Infectious Diseases. 12 (8): 1197–1202. doi:10.3201/eid1708.050929. PMC 3291204. PMID 16965697.
  47. Various (2001). Bierregaard, Richard; Gascon, Claude; Lovejoy, Thomas E.; Mesquita, Rita (eds.). Lessons from Amazonia: The Ecology and Conservation of a Fragmented Forest. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-08483-2.
  48. Amazon Rainforest 'heading to point of no return'
  49. Amazon Tipping Point
  50. Kirby, Kathryn R.; Laurance, William F.; Albernaz, Ana K.; Schroth, Götz; Fearnside, Philip M.; Bergen, Scott; M. Venticinque, Eduardo; Costa, Carlos da (2006). "The future of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon" (PDF). Futures. 38 (4): 432–453. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.573.1317. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2005.07.011.
  51. Watkins and Griffiths, J. (2000). Forest Destruction and Sustainable Agriculture in the Brazilian Amazon: a Literature Review (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Reading, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 15–17
  52. Williams, M. (2006). Deforesting the Earth: From Prehistory to Global Crisis (Abridged ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-89947-3.
  53. "Impacts and Causes of Deforestation in the Amazon Basin". kanat.jsc.vsc.edu.
  54. Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) (2004)
  55. Steinfeld, Henning; Gerber, Pierre; Wassenaar, T.D.; Castel, Vincent (2006). Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ISBN 978-92-5-105571-7. Archived from the original on July 26, 2008. Retrieved August 19, 2008.
  56. Margulis, Sergio (2004). Causes of Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon (PDF). World Bank Working Paper No. 22. Washington, DC: The World Bank. ISBN 978-0-8213-5691-3. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 10, 2008. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
  57. "Research paper of Leydimere Oliveira on the amazon". Archived from the original on August 3, 2013.
  58. Barreto, P.; Souza Jr. C.; Noguerón, R.; Anderson, A. & Salomão, R. 2006. Human Pressure on the Brazilian Amazon Forests. Imazon. Retrieved 28 September 2006. (The Imazon web site contains many resources relating to the Brazilian Amazonia.)
  59. "INPE: Estimativas Anuais desde 1988 até 2009". inpe.br. Archived from the original on November 30, 2010. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  60. "Oil Drilling Contaminated Western Amazon". livesciences.com.
  61. "Oil and Gas Extraction in the Amazon". wwf.panda.org.
  62. "EU urged to halt trade talks with S. America over Brazil abuses". France 24. June 18, 2019.
  63. "We must not barter the Amazon rainforest for burgers and steaks". The Guardian. July 2, 2019.
  64. "'Record number of fires' in Brazilian rainforest". BBC News Online. BBC Online. BBC. August 21, 2019. Retrieved August 21, 2019.
  65. Yeung, Jessie; Alvarado, Abel (August 21, 2019). "Brazil's Amazon rainforest is burning at a record rate". CNN. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. Retrieved August 21, 2019.
  66. Garrand, Danielle (August 20, 2019). "Parts of the Amazon rainforest are on fire – and smoke can be spotted from space". cbsnews.com. CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved August 21, 2019.
  67. "Record-breaking number of fires burn in Brazil's Amazon". CNBC. NBCUniversal. August 21, 2019. Retrieved August 21, 2019.
  68. "Brazil registers huge spike in Amazon deforestation". Deutsche Welle. July 3, 2019.
  69. Melillo, J.M.; McGuire, A.D.; Kicklighter, D.W.; Moore III, B.; Vörösmarty, C.J.; Schloss, A.L. (May 20, 1993). "Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production". Nature. 363 (6426): 234–240. Bibcode:1993Natur.363..234M. doi:10.1038/363234a0.
  70. Tian, H.; Melillo, J.M.; Kicklighter, D.W.; McGuire, A.D.; Helfrich III, J.; Moore III, B.; Vörösmarty, C.J. (July 2000). "Climatic and biotic controls on annual carbon storage in Amazonian ecosystems". Global Ecology and Biogeography. 9 (4): 315–335. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00198.x. S2CID 84534340.
  71. Cox, Betts, Jones, Spall and Totterdell. 2000. "Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model". Nature, 9 November 2000. (subscription required)
  72. Radford, T. 2002. "World may be warming up even faster". The Guardian.
  73. Houghton, J.T. et al. 2001. "Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis" Archived 7 May 2006 at the Wayback Machine. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  74. Peters, C.M.; Gentry, A.H.; Mendelsohn, R.O. (1989). "Valuation of an Amazonian forest". Nature. 339 (6227): 656–657. Bibcode:1989Natur.339..655P. doi:10.1038/339655a0.
  75. Dean, Bartholomew. (2003) State Power and Indigenous Peoples in Peruvian Amazonia: A Lost Decade, 1990–2000. In The Politics of Ethnicity Indigenous Peoples in Latin American States David Maybury-Lewis, Ed. Harvard University Press
  76. Cormier, L. (April 16, 2006). "A Preliminary Review of Neotropical Primates in the Subsistence and Symbolism of Indigenous Lowland South American Peoples". Ecological and Environmental Anthropology. 2 (1): 14–32. Archived from the original on December 21, 2008. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
  77. "Ecuador Amazon tribe win first victory against oil companies". Devdiscourse. April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 28, 2019.
  78. "Ecuador court rules Amazon rainforest can't be sold to oil companies". Newshub. Reuters. July 13, 2019. Archived from the original on July 19, 2019. Retrieved July 19, 2019.
  79. "US and Brazil agree to Amazon development". BBC. September 14, 2019.
  80. David Adam (March 11, 2009). "Amazon could shrink by 85% due to climate change, scientists say". the Guardian.
  81. Lovejoy, Thomas E.; Nobre, Carlos (December 20, 2019). "Amazon tipping point: Last chance for action". Science Advances. 5 (12): eaba2949. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba2949. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 6989302. PMID 32064324.
  82. Watts, Jonathan (November 28, 2017). "The Amazon effect: how deforestation is starving São Paulo of water". The Guardian. Retrieved November 8, 2018.
  83. Verchot, Louis (January 29, 2015). "The science is clear: Forest loss behind Brazil's drought". Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Retrieved November 8, 2018.
  84. E. Lovejoy, Thomas; Nobre, Carlos (February 21, 2018). "Amazon Tipping Point". Science Advances. 4 (2): eaat2340. Bibcode:2018SciA....4.2340L. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat2340. PMC 5821491. PMID 29492460.
  85. Wynne, R.H.; Joseph, K.A.; Browder, J.O.; Summers, P.M. (2007). "A Preliminary Review of Neotropical Primates in the Subsistence and Symbolism of Indigenous Lowland South American Peoples". International Journal of Remote Sensing. 28 (6): 1299–1315. Bibcode:2007IJRS...28.1299W. doi:10.1080/01431160600928609. Archived from the original on December 21, 2008. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
  86. Asner, Gregory P.; Knapp, David E.; Cooper, Amanda N.; Bustamante, Mercedes M.C.; Olander, Lydia P. (June 2005). "Ecosystem Structure throughout the Brazilian Amazon from Landsat Observations and Automated Spectral Unmixing". Earth Interactions. 9 (1): 1–31. Bibcode:2005EaInt...9g...1A. doi:10.1175/EI134.1. S2CID 31023189.
  87. Isaacson, Andy. 2007. With the Help of GPS, Amazonian Tribes Reclaim the Rain Forest. Wired 15.11: https://www.wired.com/science/planetearth/magazine/15-11/ps_amazon
  88. Kuplich, Tatiana M. (October 2006). "Classifying regenerating forest stages in Amazônia using remotely sensed images and a neural network". Forest Ecology and Management. 234 (1–3): 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.066.
  89. "Amazon Drought Worst in 100 Years". www.ens-newswire.com.
  90. Drought Threatens Amazon Basin – Extreme conditions felt for second year running, Paul Brown, The Guardian, 16 July 2006. Retrieved 23 August 2014
  91. "Amazon rainforest 'could become a desert'" Archived 6 August 2006 at the Wayback Machine, The Independent, 23 July 2006. Retrieved 28 September 2006.
  92. "Dying Forest: One year to save the Amazon", The Independent, 23 July 2006. Retrieved 23 August 2014.
  93. Nobre, Carlos; Lovejoy, Thomas E. (February 1, 2018). "Amazon Tipping Point". Science Advances. 4 (2): eaat2340. Bibcode:2018SciA....4.2340L. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat2340. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 5821491. PMID 29492460.
  94. "Climate change a threat to Amazon rainforest, warns WWF", World Wide Fund for Nature, 22 March 2006. Retrieved 23 August 2014.
  95. 2010 Amazon drought record: 8 Gt extra CO2 Archived March 27, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Rolf Schuttenhelm, Bits Of Science, 4 February 2011. Retrieved 23 August 2014
  96. "Amazon drought 'severe' in 2010, raising warming fears", BBC News, 3 February 2011. Retrieved 23 August 2014
  97. Abraham, John (August 3, 2017). "Study finds human influence in the Amazon's third 1-in-100 year drought since 2005". the Guardian.
  98. Casado, Letícia; Londoño, Ernesto (July 28, 2019). "Under Brazil's Far Right Leader, Amazon Protections Slashed and Forests Fall". The New York Times. Retrieved July 28, 2019.
  99. "Scientists fear deforestation, fires and Covid-19 could create a 'perfect storm' in the Amazon". CNN. June 19, 2020.
  100. "Brazil experiences worst start to Amazon fire season for 10 years". The Guardian. Retrieved August 13, 2020.
  101. "Brazil's Bolsonaro calls surging Amazon fires a 'lie'". Reuters. Retrieved August 11, 2020.

Further reading
  • Bunker, S.G. (1985). Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange, and the Failure of the Modern State. University of Illinois Press.
  • Cleary, David (2000). "Towards an Environmental History of the Amazon: From Pre-history to the Nineteenth Century". Latin American Research Review. 36 (2): 64–96. PMID 18524060.
  • Dean, Warren (1976). Rio Claro: A Brazilian Plantation System, 1820–1920. Stanford University Press.
  • Dean, Warren (1997). Brazil and the Struggle for Rubber: A Study in Environmental History. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hecht, Susanna and Alexander Cockburn (1990). The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers, and Defenders of the Amazon. New York: Harper Perennial.
  • Hochstetler, K. and M. Keck (2007). Greening Brazil: Environmental Activism in State and Society. Duke University Press.
  • Revkin, A. (1990). The Burning Season: The Murder of Chico Mendes and the Fight for the Amazon Rain Forest. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Wade, Lizzie (2015). "Drones and satellites spot lost civilizations in unlikely places". Science News. doi:10.1126/science.aaa7864.
  • Weinstein, Barbara (1983). The Amazon Rubber Boom 1850–1920. Stanford University Press.
  • Sheil, D.; Wunder, S. (2002). "The value of tropical forest to local communities: complications, caveats, and cautions" (PDF). Conservation Ecology. 6 (2): 9. doi:10.5751/ES-00458-060209. hdl:10535/2768.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.