Kho-Bwa languages

The Kho-Bwa languages, also known as Bugunish and Kamengic, are a small family of languages spoken in Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. The name Kho-Bwa was originally proposed by George van Driem (2001). It is based on the reconstructed words *kho ("water") and *bwa ("fire"). Blench (2011) suggests the name Kamengic, from the Kameng area of Arunachal Pradesh, or alternatively Bugun–Mey, after its two main members. Alternatively, Anderson (2014)[2] refers to Kho-Bwa as Northeast Kamengic.

Kho-Bwa
Kamengic
Bugunish
Geographic
distribution		Arunachal Pradesh
Linguistic classificationSino-Tibetan?
  • Kho-Bwa
Subdivisions
Glottologkhob1235[1]

Both Van Driem and Blench group the Bugun (or Khowa), the Mey (or Sherdukpen), and the Lishpa (or Lish) languages. The Puroik (or Sulung) language is included in the group by Van Driem but treated as a language isolate with no genetic relation to Kamengic by Blench.

These languages have traditionally been placed in the Tibeto-Burman group by the Linguistic Survey of India, but the justification of this is open to question. The languages have certainly been strongly influenced by the neighboring Sino-Tibetan languages, but this does not necessarily imply genetic unity and may possibly be a purely areal effect.[3]

The entire language family has about 15,000 speakers (including Puroik) or about 10,000 speakers (excluding Puroik), according to estimates made during the 2000s.

Word lists and sociolinguistic surveys of Kho-Bwa languages have also been conducted by Abraham, et al. (2018).

Classification

The internal structure of the Kho-Bwa group of languages is as follows.

  • Puroik
  • Bugun (Khowa)
  • Western Kho-Bwa
    • Mey–Sartang
      • Sherdukpen (Mey, Ngnok), divided into two varieties:
        • Shergaon
        • Rupa
      • Sartang (Bootpa, But Monpa, But Pa, Matchopa), 50%–60% lexical similarity with Mey.
    • Chug–Lish
      • Lish (Lish)
      • Chug (Chug Monpa, Chugpa, Monpa), close to Lish

Lieberherr & Bodt (2017)[4] consider Puroik to be a Kho-Bwa language, and classify the Kho-Bwa languages as follows.

Kho-Bwa

Vocabulary

The following table of Kho-Bwa basic vocabulary items is from Blench (2015).[5]

Gloss Mey (Shergaon) Mey (Rupa) Sartang (Jergaon) Sartang (Rahung) Lish (Khispi) Chug (Duhumbi)
one hǎnhanhènhânhinhin
two ɲǐtɲiknìkněɲesniʃ
three ùŋuŋùŋùúnʔumom
four pʰʃìbsisìpsìpʰəhipsi
five kʰùkʰukʰùkʰukʰakʰa
six ʧùkkitʧìkʨěyʧʰuʔʧyk
seven ʃìtsitsìksǐ, sěʃishis
eight sàʤátsarʤatsàrgèsàrʤɛ́saɾgeʔsaɾgeʔ
nine tʰkʰídʰikʰitʰkʰìtɛ̀kʰɯ́ṱʰikʰuṱʰikʰu
ten sɔ̀ ̃sõsã̀sɔʃanʃan
head kʰrukkʰrukkʰrǔkkʰruʔkʰoloʔkʰloʔ
nose nupʰuŋnəfuŋnfùŋapʰuŋhempoŋheŋpʰoŋ
eye khibikivikábìkʰaʔbykʰumukʰum
ear kʰtùŋgtʰiŋgtʰìŋktèíŋkʰutʰuŋkʰutʰuŋ
tongue laphõlapon?leloiloi
tooth nuthuŋtokʧemísìŋnitʰiŋʃiŋtuŋhintuŋ
arm ikikìkikhuhut
leg làlaponlɛ̌lɛ̌leilai
belly ʃrìŋsliŋsrìŋsriŋhiɲiŋhiliŋ
bone skìkskikàhíkskikʃukuʃʃukuʃ
blood hàha(a)hɛ̀hahoihoi
face dòŋpùbomizə̀ídoʔdoŋpa
tooth ntùŋtokʧemísìŋptə̀íŋʃiŋtuŋhintuŋ
stomach àlàkarbuʧàkphriŋhiɲiŋhiliŋ
mouth ʧàwnəʧawsoʨʨǒhoʧokkʰoʧu
rain ʧuumaniminʧʰùʧuʧubanamunamu
gollark: Not really, as far as I'm aware.
gollark: I mean, it has addresses (ish) and proof of work mining, and internally uses a blockchain, but it's centralized.
gollark: It's not really.
gollark: PotatOS PX demo and hopefully not a sandbox exploit: https://pastebin.com/kw19yhqw
gollark: It's better than using Google.

See also

Further reading
  • Tiago Tresoldi, & Johann-Mattis List. (2019). Sub-grouping Kho-Bwa based on shared core vocabulary (Version v0.1) [Data set]. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.2553234
  • Johann-Mattis List, Mei Shin Wu, Robert Forkel, & Tiago Tresoldi. (2019). lexibank/bodtkhobwa: Lexical Cognates in Western Kho-Bwa (Version v2.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3537604
  • Yunfan Lai, Mei Shin Wu, Johann-Mattis List, & Nathanael Schweikhard. (2019). lexibank/abrahammonpa: Sociolinguistic Research on Monpa (Version v2.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3537601

References
  1. Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2017). "Kho-Bwa". Glottolog 3.0. Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
  2. Anderson, Gregory D.S. 2014. On the classification of the Hruso (Aka) language. Paper presented at the 20th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
  3. Blench (2011): "Certainly, the phonology and morphology of Arunachali languages looks superficially like Tibeto-Burman, which explains their placing in the Linguistic Survey of India. Unfortunately, this is rather where matters have remained [... this paper] proposes we should take seriously the underlying presumption probably implied in Konow's statement in Linguistic Survey of India. Volume III, 1, Tibeto-Burman family, Calcutta (1909:572)], that these languages may not be Sino-Tibetan but simply have been influenced by it; that they are language isolates."
  4. Lieberherr, Ismael; Bodt, Timotheus Adrianus. 2017. Sub-grouping Kho-Bwa based on shared core vocabulary. In Himalayan Linguistics, 16(2).
  5. Blench, Roger. 2015. The Mey languages and their classification. Presentation given at the University of Sydney, 21 August 2015.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.