World Trade Organization

The World Trade Organization (WTO) is an intergovernmental organization that is concerned with the regulation of international trade between nations. The WTO officially commenced on 1 January 1995 under the Marrakesh Agreement, signed by 123 nations on 15 April 1994, replacing the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which commenced in 1948. It is the largest international economic organization in the world.[5][6]

"WTO" redirects here. For other uses, see WTO (disambiguation).

World Trade Organization / OMC
Organisation mondiale du commerce (in French)
Organización Mundial del Comercio (in Spanish)
  Members
  Members, dually represented by the EU
  Observers
  Non-participant states
Formation1 January 1995 (1995-01-01)
TypeInternational trade organization
PurposeReduction of tariffs and other barriers to trade
HeadquartersCentre William Rappard, Geneva, Switzerland
Coordinates46°13′27″N 06°08′58″E
Region served
Worldwide
Membership
164 member states[1]
Official languages
English, French, Spanish[2]
Roberto Azevêdo
Budget
197.2 million Swiss francs (approx. 209 million US$) in 2018.[3]
Staff
640[4]
Websitewww.wto.org

The WTO deals with regulation of trade in goods, services and intellectual property between participating countries by providing a framework for negotiating trade agreements and a dispute resolution process aimed at enforcing participants' adherence to WTO agreements, which are signed by representatives of member governments[7]:fol.9–10 and ratified by their parliaments.[8] The WTO prohibits discrimination between trading partners, but provides exceptions for environmental protection, national security, and other important goals.[9] Trade-related disputes are resolved by independent judges at the WTO through a dispute resolution process.[9]

The WTO's current Director-General is Roberto Azevêdo,[10][11] who leads a staff of over 600 people in Geneva, Switzerland.[12] A trade facilitation agreement, part of the Bali Package of decisions, was agreed by all members on 7 December 2013, the first comprehensive agreement in the organization's history.[13][14] On 23 January 2017, the amendment to the WTO Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement marks the first time since the organization opened in 1995 that WTO accords have been amended, and this change should secure for developing countries a legal pathway to access affordable remedies under WTO rules.[15]

Studies show that the WTO boosted trade,[16][17][9] and that barriers to trade would be higher in the absence of the WTO.[18] The WTO has highly influenced the text of trade agreements, as "nearly all recent [preferential trade agreements (PTAs)] reference the WTO explicitly, often dozens of times across multiple chapters... in many of these same PTAs we find that substantial portions of treaty language—sometime the majority of a chapter—is copied verbatim from a WTO agreement."[19]

History
Main article: History of the World Trade Organization
The economists Harry White (left) and John Maynard Keynes at the Bretton Woods Conference.[20]

The WTO's predecessor, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), was established by a multilateral treaty of 23 countries in 1947 after World War II in the wake of other new multilateral institutions dedicated to international economic cooperation—such as the World Bank (founded 1944) and the International Monetary Fund (founded 1944 or 1945). A comparable international institution for trade, named the International Trade Organization never started as the U.S. and other signatories did not ratify the establishment treaty,[21][22][23] and so GATT slowly became a de facto international organization.[24]

GATT negotiations before Uruguay
See also: General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

Seven rounds of negotiations occurred under GATT (1949 to 1979). The first real GATT trade rounds (1947 to 1960) concentrated on further reducing tariffs. Then the Kennedy Round in the mid-sixties brought about a GATT anti-dumping agreement and a section on development. The Tokyo Round during the seventies represented the first major attempt to tackle trade barriers that do not take the form of tariffs, and to improve the system, adopting a series of agreements on non-tariff barriers, which in some cases interpreted existing GATT rules, and in others broke entirely new ground. Because not all GATT members accepted these plurilateral agreements, they were often informally called "codes". (The Uruguay Round amended several of these codes and turned them into multilateral commitments accepted by all WTO members. Only four remained plurilateral (those on government procurement, bovine meat, civil aircraft and dairy products), but in 1997 WTO members agreed to terminate the bovine meat and dairy agreements, leaving only two.[25]) Despite attempts in the mid-1950s and 1960s to establish some form of institutional mechanism for international trade, the GATT continued to operate for almost half a century as a semi-institutionalized multilateral treaty régime on a provisional basis.[26]

Uruguay Round: 1986–1994
Main article: Uruguay Round
During the Doha Round, the US government blamed Brazil and India for being inflexible and the EU for impeding agricultural imports.[27][28]

Well before GATT's 40th anniversary, its members concluded that the GATT system was straining to adapt to a new globalizing world economy.[29][30] In response to the problems identified in the 1982 Ministerial Declaration (structural deficiencies, spill-over impacts of certain countries' policies on world trade GATT could not manage, etc.), the eighth GATT round—known as the Uruguay Round—was launched in September 1986, in Punta del Este, Uruguay.[29]

It was the biggest negotiating mandate on trade ever agreed: the talks aimed to extend the trading system into several new areas, notably trade in services and intellectual property, and to reform trade in the sensitive sectors of agriculture and textiles; all the original GATT articles were up for review.[30] The Final Act concluding the Uruguay Round and officially establishing the WTO regime was signed 15 April 1994, during the ministerial meeting at Marrakesh, Morocco, and hence is known as the Marrakesh Agreement.[31]

The GATT still exists as the WTO's umbrella treaty for trade in goods, updated as a result of the Uruguay Round negotiations (a distinction is made between GATT 1994, the updated parts of GATT, and GATT 1947, the original agreement which is still the heart of GATT 1994).[29] GATT 1994 is not, however, the only legally binding agreement included via the Final Act at Marrakesh; a long list of about 60 agreements, annexes, decisions and understandings was adopted. The agreements fall into six main parts:

  • the Agreement Establishing the WTO
  • the Multilateral Agreements on Trade in Goods[32]
  • the General Agreement on Trade in Services
  • the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
  • dispute settlement[33]
  • reviews of governments' trade policies[34]

In terms of the WTO's principle relating to tariff "ceiling-binding" (No. 3), the Uruguay Round has been successful in increasing binding commitments by both developed and developing countries, as may be seen in the percentages of tariffs bound before and after the 1986–1994 talks.[35]

Ministerial conferences
The World Trade Organization Ministerial Conference of 1998, in the Palace of Nations (Geneva, Switzerland).

The highest decision-making body of the WTO, the Ministerial Conference, usually meets every two years.[36] It brings together all members of the WTO, all of which are countries or customs unions. The Ministerial Conference can take decisions on all matters under any of the multilateral trade agreements. Some meetings, such as the inaugural ministerial conference in Singapore and the Cancun conference in 2003[37] involved arguments between developed and developing economies referred to as the "Singapore issues" such as agricultural subsidies; while others such as the Seattle conference in 1999 provoked large demonstrations. The fourth ministerial conference in Doha in 2001 approved China's entry to the WTO and launched the Doha Development Round which was supplemented by the sixth WTO ministerial conference (in Hong Kong) which agreed to phase out agricultural export subsidies and to adopt the European Union's Everything but Arms initiative to phase out tariffs for goods from the Least Developed Countries.

The Twelfth Ministerial Conference (MC12) is set to be held in Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan, in June 2020.

Doha Round (Doha Agenda): 2001–present
Main article: Doha Development Round

The WTO launched the current round of negotiations, the Doha Development Round, at the fourth ministerial conference in Doha, Qatar in November 2001. This was to be an ambitious effort to make globalization more inclusive and help the world's poor, particularly by slashing barriers and subsidies in farming.[38] The initial agenda comprised both further trade liberalization and new rule-making, underpinned by commitments to strengthen substantial assistance to developing countries.[39]

Progress stalled over differences between developed nations and the major developing countries on issues such as industrial tariffs and non-tariff barriers to trade[40] particularly against and between the EU and the US over their maintenance of agricultural subsidies—seen to operate effectively as trade barriers. Repeated attempts to revive the talks proved unsuccessful,[41] though the adoption of the Bali Ministerial Declaration in 2013[42] addressed bureaucratic barriers to commerce.[43]

As of June 2012, the future of the Doha Round remained uncertain: the work programme lists 21 subjects in which the original deadline of 1 January 2005 was missed, and the round remains incomplete.[44] The conflict between free trade on industrial goods and services but retention of protectionism on farm subsidies to domestic agricultural sectors (requested by developed countries) and the substantiation of fair trade on agricultural products (requested by developing countries) remain the major obstacles. This impasse has made it impossible to launch new WTO negotiations beyond the Doha Development Round. As a result, there have been an increasing number of bilateral free trade agreements between governments.[45] As of July 2012 there were various negotiation groups in the WTO system for the current stalemated agricultural trade negotiation.[46]

Functions

Among the various functions of the WTO, these are regarded by analysts as the most important:

  • It oversees the implementation, administration and operation of the covered agreements (with the exception is that it does not enforce any agreements when China came into the WTO in Dec 2001)[47][48]
  • It provides a forum for negotiations and for settling disputes.[49][50]

Additionally, it is WTO's duty to review and propagate the national trade policies, and to ensure the coherence and transparency of trade policies through surveillance in global economic policy-making.[48][50] Another priority of the WTO is the assistance of developing, least-developed and low-income countries in transition to adjust to WTO rules and disciplines through technical cooperation and training.[51]

  1. The WTO shall facilitate the implementation, administration and operation and further the objectives of this Agreement and of the Multilateral Trade Agreements, and shall also provide the framework for the implementation, administration and operation of the multilateral Trade Agreements.
  2. The WTO shall provide the forum for negotiations among its members concerning their multilateral trade relations in matters dealt with under the Agreement in the Annexes to this Agreement.
  3. The WTO shall administer the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.
  4. The WTO shall administer Trade Policy Review Mechanism.
  5. With a view to achieving greater coherence in global economic policy making, the WTO shall cooperate, as appropriate, with the international Monetary Fund (IMF) and with the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and its affiliated agencies.[52]

The above five listings are the additional functions of the World Trade Organization. As globalization proceeds in today's society, the necessity of an International Organization to manage the trading systems has been of vital importance. As the trade volume increases, issues such as protectionism, trade barriers, subsidies, violation of intellectual property arise due to the differences in the trading rules of every nation. The World Trade Organization serves as the mediator between the nations when such problems arise. WTO could be referred to as the product of globalization and also as one of the most important organizations in today's globalized society.

The WTO is also a centre of economic research and analysis: regular assessments of the global trade picture in its annual publications and research reports on specific topics are produced by the organization.[53] Finally, the WTO cooperates closely with the two other components of the Bretton Woods system, the IMF and the World Bank.[49]

Principles of the trading system

The WTO establishes a framework for trade policies; it does not define or specify outcomes. That is, it is concerned with setting the rules of the trade policy games.[54] Five principles are of particular importance in understanding both the pre-1994 GATT and the WTO:

  1. Non-discrimination. It has two major components: the most favoured nation (MFN) rule, and the national treatment policy. Both are embedded in the main WTO rules on goods, services, and intellectual property, but their precise scope and nature differ across these areas. The MFN rule requires that a WTO member must apply the same conditions on all trade with other WTO members, i.e. a WTO member has to grant the most favourable conditions under which it allows trade in a certain product type to all other WTO members.[54] "Grant someone a special favour and you have to do the same for all other WTO members."[35] National treatment means that imported goods should be treated no less favourably than domestically produced goods (at least after the foreign goods have entered the market) and was introduced to tackle non-tariff barriers to trade (e.g. technical standards, security standards et al. discriminating against imported goods).[54]
  2. Reciprocity. It reflects both a desire to limit the scope of free-riding that may arise because of the MFN rule, and a desire to obtain better access to foreign markets. A related point is that for a nation to negotiate, it is necessary that the gain from doing so be greater than the gain available from unilateral liberalization; reciprocal concessions intend to ensure that such gains will materialise.[55]
  3. Binding and enforceable commitments. The tariff commitments made by WTO members in a multilateral trade negotiation and on accession are enumerated in a schedule (list) of concessions. These schedules establish "ceiling bindings": a country can change its bindings, but only after negotiating with its trading partners, which could mean compensating them for loss of trade. If satisfaction is not obtained, the complaining country may invoke the WTO dispute settlement procedures.[35][55]
  4. Transparency. The WTO members are required to publish their trade regulations, to maintain institutions allowing for the review of administrative decisions affecting trade, to respond to requests for information by other members, and to notify changes in trade policies to the WTO. These internal transparency requirements are supplemented and facilitated by periodic country-specific reports (trade policy reviews) through the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM).[56] The WTO system tries also to improve predictability and stability, discouraging the use of quotas and other measures used to set limits on quantities of imports.[35]
  5. Safety values. In specific circumstances, governments are able to restrict trade. The WTO's agreements permit members to take measures to protect not only the environment but also public health, animal health and plant health.[57]

There are three types of provision in this direction:

  1. articles allowing for the use of trade measures to attain non-economic objectives;
  2. articles aimed at ensuring "fair competition"; members must not use environmental protection measures as a means of disguising protectionist policies.[57][58]
  3. provisions permitting intervention in trade for economic reasons.[56]

Exceptions to the MFN principle also allow for preferential treatment of developing countries, regional free trade areas and customs unions.[7]:fol.93

Organizational structure

The highest authority of the WTO is the Ministerial Conference, which must meet at least every two years.[59]

In between of each Ministerial Conference, the daily work is handled by three bodies whose membership is one and the same; they only differ by the terms of reference under which each body is constituted.[59]

  • The General Council
  • The Dispute Settlement Body
  • The Trade Policy Review Body

The General Council, whose Chair as of 2020 is David Walker of New Zealand,[60] has the following subsidiary bodies which oversee committees in different areas:

Council for Trade in Goods
There are 11 committees under the jurisdiction of the Goods Council each with a specific task. All members of the WTO participate in the committees. The Textiles Monitoring Body is separate from the other committees but still under the jurisdiction of Goods Council. The body has its own chairman and only 10 members. The body also has several groups relating to textiles.[61]
Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
Information on intellectual property in the WTO, news and official records of the activities of the TRIPS Council, and details of the WTO's work with other international organizations in the field.[62]
Council for Trade in Services
The Council for Trade in Services operates under the guidance of the General Council and is responsible for overseeing the functioning of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). It is open to all WTO members, and can create subsidiary bodies as required.[63]
Trade Negotiations Committee
The Trade Negotiations Committee (TNC) is the committee that deals with the current trade talks round. The chair is WTO's director-general. As of June 2012 the committee was tasked with the Doha Development Round.[64]

The Service Council has three subsidiary bodies: financial services, domestic regulations, GATS rules and specific commitments.[61] The council has several different committees, working groups, and working parties.[65] There are committees on the following: Trade and Environment; Trade and Development (Subcommittee on Least-Developed Countries); Regional Trade Agreements; Balance of Payments Restrictions; and Budget, Finance and Administration. There are working parties on the following: Accession. There are working groups on the following: Trade, debt and finance; and Trade and technology transfer.

Decision-making

The WTO describes itself as "a rules-based, member-driven organization—all decisions are made by the member governments, and the rules are the outcome of negotiations among members".[66] The WTO Agreement foresees votes where consensus cannot be reached, but the practice of consensus dominates the process of decision-making.[67]

Richard Harold Steinberg (2002) argues that although the WTO's consensus governance model provides law-based initial bargaining, trading rounds close through power-based bargaining favouring Europe and the U.S., and may not lead to Pareto improvement.[68]

Dispute settlement

The WTO's dispute-settlement system "is the result of the evolution of rules, procedures and practices developed over almost half a century under the GATT 1947".[69] In 1994, the WTO members agreed on the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU) annexed to the "Final Act" signed in Marrakesh in 1994.[70] Dispute settlement is regarded by the WTO as the central pillar of the multilateral trading system, and as a "unique contribution to the stability of the global economy".[71] WTO members have agreed that, if they believe fellow-members are violating trade rules, they will use the multilateral system of settling disputes instead of taking action unilaterally.[72]

The operation of the WTO dispute settlement process involves case-specific panels[73] appointed by the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB),[74] the Appellate Body,[75] The Director-General and the WTO Secretariat,[76] arbitrators,[77] and advisory experts.[78]

The priority is to settle disputes, preferably through a mutually agreed solution, and provision has been made for the process to be conducted in an efficient and timely manner so that "If a case is adjudicated, it should normally take no more than one year for a panel ruling and no more than 16 months if the case is appealed... If the complainant deems the case urgent, consideration of the case should take even less time.[79] WTO member nations are obliged to accept the process as exclusive and compulsory.[80]

According to a 2018 study in the Journal of Politics, states are less likely and slower to enforce WTO violations when the violations affect states in a diffuse manner.[81] This is because states face collective action problems with pursuing litigation: they all expect other states to carry the costs of litigation.[81] A 2016 study in International Studies Quarterly challenges that the WTO dispute settlement system leads to greater increases in trade.[82]

However, the dispute settlement system cannot be used to resolve trade disputes that arise from political disagreements. When Qatar requested the establishment of a dispute panel concerning measures imposed by the UAE, other GCC countries and the US were quick to dismiss its request as a political matter, stating that national security issues were political and not appropriate for the WTO dispute system.[83]

Accession and membership

The process of becoming a WTO member is unique to each applicant country, and the terms of accession are dependent upon the country's stage of economic development and current trade regime.[84] The process takes about five years, on average, but it can last longer if the country is less than fully committed to the process or if political issues interfere. The shortest accession negotiation was that of the Kyrgyz Republic, while the longest was that of Russia, which, having first applied to join GATT in 1993, was approved for membership in December 2011 and became a WTO member on 22 August 2012.[85] Kazakhstan also had a long accession negotiation process. The Working Party on the Accession of Kazakhstan was established in 1996 and was approved for membership in 2015.[86] The second longest was that of Vanuatu, whose Working Party on the Accession of Vanuatu was established on 11 July 1995. After a final meeting of the Working Party in October 2001, Vanuatu requested more time to consider its accession terms. In 2008, it indicated its interest to resume and conclude its WTO accession. The Working Party on the Accession of Vanuatu was reconvened informally on 4 April 2011 to discuss Vanuatu's future WTO membership. The re-convened Working Party completed its mandate on 2 May 2011. The General Council formally approved the Accession Package of Vanuatu on 26 October 2011. On 24 August 2012, the WTO welcomed Vanuatu as its 157th member.[87] An offer of accession is only given once consensus is reached among interested parties.[88]

A 2017 study argues that "political ties rather than issue-area functional gains determine who joins" and shows "how geopolitical alignment shapes the demand and supply sides of membership".[89] The "findings challenge the view that states first liberalize trade to join the GATT/WTO. Instead, democracy and foreign policy similarity encourage states to join."[89]

Accession process
WTO accession progress:[90]
  Draft Working Party Report or Factual Summary adopted
  Goods or Services offers submitted
  Working party meetings
  Memorandum on Foreign Trade Regime submitted
  Working party established

A country wishing to accede to the WTO submits an application to the General Council, and has to describe all aspects of its trade and economic policies that have a bearing on WTO agreements.[91] The application is submitted to the WTO in a memorandum which is examined by a working party open to all interested WTO Members.[92]

After all necessary background information has been acquired, the working party focuses on issues of discrepancy between the WTO rules and the applicant's international and domestic trade policies and laws. The working party determines the terms and conditions of entry into the WTO for the applicant nation, and may consider transitional periods to allow countries some leeway in complying with the WTO rules.[84]

The final phase of accession involves bilateral negotiations between the applicant nation and other working party members regarding the concessions and commitments on tariff levels and market access for goods and services. The new member's commitments are to apply equally to all WTO members under normal non-discrimination rules, even though they are negotiated bilaterally.[91] For instance, as a result of joining the WTO, Armenia offered a 15 per cent ceiling bound tariff rate on accessing its market for goods. Together with the tariff bindings being ad valorem there are no specific or compound rates. Moreover, there are no tariff-rate quotas on both industrial and agricultural products.[93] Armenia's economic and trade performance growth was noted since its first review in 2010, especially its revival from the 2008 global financial crisis, with an average annual 4% GDP growth rate, despite of some fluctuations. Armenia's economy was marked by low inflation, diminishing poverty and essential progress in enhancing its macroeconomic steadiness in which trade in goods and services, which is the equivalent of 87% of GDP, played a growing role.[94]

When the bilateral talks conclude, the working party sends to the general council or ministerial conference an accession package, which includes a summary of all the working party meetings, the Protocol of Accession (a draft membership treaty), and lists ("schedules") of the member-to-be's commitments. Once the general council or ministerial conference approves of the terms of accession, the applicant's parliament must ratify the Protocol of Accession before it can become a member.[95] Some countries may have faced tougher and a much longer accession process due to challenges during negotiations with other WTO members, such as Vietnam, whose negotiations took more than 11 years before it became official member in January 2007.[96]

Members and observers

The WTO has 164 members and 24 observer governments.[97] Liberia became the 163rd member on 14 July 2016, and Afghanistan became the 164th member on 29 July 2016.[98][99] In addition to states, the European Union, and each EU country in its own right,[100] is a member. WTO members do not have to be fully independent states; they need only be a customs territory with full autonomy in the conduct of their external commercial relations. Thus Hong Kong has been a member since 1995 (as "Hong Kong, China" since 1997) predating the People's Republic of China, which joined in 2001 after 15 years of negotiations. The Republic of China (Taiwan) acceded to the WTO in 2002 as "Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu" (Chinese Taipei) despite its disputed status.[101] The WTO Secretariat omits the official titles (such as Counsellor, First Secretary, Second Secretary and Third Secretary) of the members of Chinese Taipei's Permanent Mission to the WTO, except for the titles of the Permanent Representative and the Deputy Permanent Representative.[102]

As of 2007, WTO member states represented 96.4% of global trade and 96.7% of global GDP.[103] Iran, followed by Algeria, are the economies with the largest GDP and trade outside the WTO, using 2005 data.[104][105] With the exception of the Holy See, observers must start accession negotiations within five years of becoming observers. A number of international intergovernmental organizations have also been granted observer status to WTO bodies.[106] 12 UN member states have no official affiliation with the WTO.

Agreements

The WTO oversees about 60 different agreements which have the status of international legal texts. Member countries must sign and ratify all WTO agreements on accession.[107] A discussion of some of the most important agreements follows.

The Agreement on Agriculture came into effect with the establishment of the WTO at the beginning of 1995. The AoA has three central concepts, or "pillars": domestic support, market access and export subsidies.

The General Agreement on Trade in Services was created to extend the multilateral trading system to service sector, in the same way as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) provided such a system for merchandise trade. The agreement entered into force in January 1995.

The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights sets down minimum standards for many forms of intellectual property (IP) regulation. It was negotiated at the end of the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1994.[108]

The Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures—also known as the SPS Agreement—was negotiated during the Uruguay Round of GATT, and entered into force with the establishment of the WTO at the beginning of 1995. Under the SPS agreement, the WTO sets constraints on members' policies relating to food safety (bacterial contaminants, pesticides, inspection and labelling) as well as animal and plant health (imported pests and diseases).

The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade is an international treaty of the World Trade Organization. It was negotiated during the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, and entered into force with the establishment of the WTO at the end of 1994. The object ensures that technical negotiations and standards, as well as testing and certification procedures, do not create unnecessary obstacles to trade".[109]

The Agreement on Customs Valuation, formally known as the Agreement on Implementation of Article VII of GATT, prescribes methods of customs valuation that Members are to follow. Chiefly, it adopts the "transaction value" approach.

In December 2013, the biggest agreement within the WTO was signed and known as the Bali Package.[110]

Office of director-general
The headquarters of the World Trade Organization in Geneva, Switzerland.

The procedures for the appointment of the WTO director-general were updated in January 2003,[111] and include quadrennial terms.[60] Additionally, there are four deputy directors-general. As of 13 June 2018 under director-general Roberto Azevêdo, the four deputy directors-general are:

  • Yi Xiaozhun of China (since 1 October 2017),
  • Karl Brauner of Germany (since 1 October 2013),
  • Yonov Frederick Agah of Nigeria (since 1 October 2013) and
  • Alan W. Wolff of the United States (since 1 October 2017).[112]

List of directors-general

Source: Official website[113]

Name Country Term
Peter Sutherland Ireland1995
Renato Ruggiero Italy1995–1999
Mike Moore New Zealand1999–2002
Supachai Panitchpakdi Thailand2002–2005
Pascal Lamy France2005-2009, 2009–2013
Roberto Azevêdo Brazil2013–2017, 2017-present

(Heads of the precursor organization, GATT):

2020 director-general selection

In May 2020, Director-General Roberto Azevêdo announced he will step down on 31 August 2020, a year before it expires.[114] The candidates to succeed the current Director-General listed in the order the nominations were received are as follows:[115]

Budget

The WTO derives most of the income for its annual budget from contributions by its Members. These are established according to a formula based on their share of international trade.

2019 Top 10 Members’ contributions to the consolidated budget of the WTO[116]
RankCountryCHFPercentage
1 United States22,660,40511.59%
2 China19,737,68010.10%
3 Germany13,882,4557.10%
4 Japan7,896,2454.04%
5 United Kingdom7,446,5953.81%
6 France7,440,7303.81%
7 South Korea5,777,0252.96%
8 Netherlands5,745,7452.94%
9 Hong Kong5,427,0802.78%
10 Italy5,096,6852.61%
Others94,389,35548.28%
TOTAL195,500,000100.00%

Criticism
Main article: Criticism of the World Trade Organization

Although tariffs and other trade barriers have been significantly reduced thanks to GATT and WTO, the promise that free trade will accelerate economic growth, reduce poverty, and increase people's incomes has been questioned by many critics.[117] Some prominent skeptics cite the example of El Salvador. In the early 1990s, they removed all quantitative barriers to imports and also cut tariffs. However, the country's economic growth remained weak. On the other hand, Vietnam which only began reforming its economy in the late 1980s, saw a great deal of success by deciding to follow the China's economic model and liberalizing slowly along with implementing safeguards for domestic commerce. Vietnam has largely succeeded in accelerating economic growth and reducing poverty without immediately removing substantial trade barriers.[118][117] Although there were other factors that affected the economic performance of these two countries and some might say that it is essentially because of the ultimate opening up of the markets that contributed to the growth story that is attributed with Vietnam's economy.

Economist Ha-Joon Chang himself argues that there is a "paradox" in neo-liberal beliefs regarding free trade, because the economic growth of developing countries was higher in the 1960-1980 period compared to the 1980-2000 period even though its trade policies are now far more liberal than before. In addition, there are also results of research that show that new countries actively reduce trade barriers only after becoming significantly rich. From the results of the study, WTO critics argue that trade liberalization does not guarantee economic growth and certainly not poverty alleviation.[117]

WTO critics also put forward the view that the benefits derived from free trade are not shared equally. This criticism is usually supported by data showing that the gap between the rich and the poor continues to widen, especially in China and India, where economic inequality is growing even though economic growth is very high.[117] In addition, WTO approaches aiming to reduce trade barriers can harm developing countries. Trade liberalization that is too early without any prominent domestic barriers is feared to trap the developing economies in the primary sector, which often does not require skilled labor. And when these developing countries decide to advance their economy by means of industrialization, the premature domestic industry cannot immediately skyrocket as expected, making it difficult to compete with other countries whose industries are more advanced.[119]

WTO protesters on 7th Avenue, Seattle, US, 1999

It is said that leading economist Adam Smith once gave advice to the newly independent United States government at that time to focus on the domestic agricultural sector rather than trying to compete with Europe whose industry was more advanced. The United States eventually set high tariffs to protect American producers. Only then the United States became one of the countries with a strongest domestic industry, in the world. The same is said about East Asian economies. Some even predict that if South Korea had abolished its tariffs earlier, it would have been more likely that the country would still be a semi-industrialized, rice-producing country.[119]

WTO law has also been severely criticized because of the Agreement on Agriculture, which essentially allows developed countries to maintain agricultural subsidies (an example being the Common Agricultural Policy in the European Union) while not favoring the developing countries as much. As a result of these subsidies, these countries often sell excess produce to world markets at much lower prices, and dumping them in poorer countries. Even though WTO members have agreed to eliminate agricultural export subsidies, some say that the developed countries still maintain subsidies and protect their agricultural sector with trade barriers, and this practice impedes the development of the agricultural industry in developing countries.[120]

On the other hand, if all agricultural subsidies were to be immediately abolished, food prices could potentially skyrocket, and this could also harm the people and threaten food security in some of the countries. Therefore, legal experts who criticize the WTO from a human rights perspective suggest that this subsidy should be phased out gradually, so that the market can adjust to the changes that occur.[121]

Impact

Studies show that the WTO boosted trade.[16][17] Research shows that in the absence of the WTO, the average country would face an increase in tariffs on their exports by 32 percentage points.[18][122] The dispute settlement mechanism in the WTO is one way in which trade is increased.[123][124][125][126]

According to a 2017 study in the Journal of International Economic Law, "nearly all recent [preferential trade agreements (PTAs) reference the WTO explicitly, often dozens of times across multiple chapters. Likewise, in many of these same PTAs we find that substantial portions of treaty language—sometime the majority of a chapter—is copied verbatim from a WTO agreement... the presence of the WTO in PTAs has increased over time."[19]

gollark: <@319753218592866315> I roll for having a phone at home, d6.
gollark: Wait, hmm.
gollark: How much do *I* have?
gollark: My bee business is fairly successful, so I probably have money a bit.
gollark: Yes, but magic can seemingly do ridiculously powerful things even in lowmagic areas.

See also

Notes and references
  1. Members and Observers Archived 10 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine at WTO official website
  2. Languages, Documentation and Information Management Division Archived 24 December 2011 at the Wayback Machine at WTO official site
  3. "WTO Secretariat budget for 2018". WTO official site. Archived from the original on 9 May 2019. Retrieved 26 January 2019.
  4. "WTO – What is the WTO? – What we stand for". www.wto.org. Archived from the original on 6 June 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
  5. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 18 May 2017. Retrieved 20 May 2017.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  6. "WTO – Understanding the WTO – The GATT years: from Havana to Marrakesh". www.wto.org. Archived from the original on 5 March 2018. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
  7. Understanding the WTO Archived 6 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine Handbook at WTO official website. (Note that the document's printed folio numbers do not match the pdf page numbers.)
  8. Malanczuk, P. (1999). "International Organisations and Space Law: World Trade Organization". Encyclopædia Britannica. 442. p. 305. Bibcode:1999ESASP.442..305M.
  9. "U.S. Trade Policy: Going it Alone vs. Abiding by the WTO | Econofact". Econofact. 15 June 2018. Archived from the original on 30 June 2018. Retrieved 30 June 2018.
  10. Bourcier, Nicolas (21 May 2013). "Roberto Azevedo's WTO appointment gives Brazil a seat at the top table". Guardian Weekly. Archived from the original on 28 August 2013. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
  11. "Roberto Azevêdo takes over". WTO official website. 1 September 2013. Archived from the original on 1 September 2013. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
  12. "Overview of the WTO Secretariat". WTO official website. Archived from the original on 1 September 2013. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
  13. Ninth WTO Ministerial Conference | WTO – MC9 Archived 1 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  14. Walker, Andrew (7 December 2013). "WTO agrees global trade agreement". Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2019 – via www.bbc.co.uk.
  15. "WTO | 2017 News items – WTO IP rules amended to ease poor countries' access to affordable medicines". Archived from the original on 26 October 2017. Retrieved 25 October 2017.
  16. Goldstein, Judith L.; Rivers, Douglas; Tomz, Michael (2007). "Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade". International Organization. 61 (1): 37–67. doi:10.1017/S0020818307070014. ISSN 1531-5088.
  17. Tomz, Michael; Goldstein, Judith L; Rivers, Douglas (2007). "Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade? Comment". American Economic Review. 97 (5): 2005–2018. doi:10.1257/aer.97.5.2005. ISSN 0002-8282.
  18. Silva, Peri Agostinho; Nicita, Alessandro; Olarreaga, Marcelo (22 January 2018). "Cooperation in WTO's Tariff Waters?". Journal of Political Economy. 126 (3): 1302–1338. doi:10.1086/697085. ISSN 0022-3808.
  19. Allee, Todd; Elsig, Manfred; Lugg, Andrew (2017). "The Ties between the World Trade Organization and Preferential Trade Agreements: A Textual Analysis". Journal of International Economic Law. 20 (2): 333–363. doi:10.1093/jiel/jgx009. ISSN 1369-3034.
  20. A.E. Eckes Jr., US Trade History, 73
    * A. Smithies, Reflections on the Work of Keynes, 578–601
    * N. Warren, Internet and Globalization, 193
  21. P. van den Bossche, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, 80
  22. Palmeter-Mavroidis, Dispute Settlement, 2
  23. Fergusson, Ian F. (9 May 2007). "The World Trade Organization: Background and Issues" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 September 2013. Retrieved 15 August 2008.
  24. It was contemplated that the GATT would apply for several years until the ITO came into force. However, since the ITO never materialized, the GATT gradually became the focus for international governmental cooperation on trade matters, with economist Nicholas Halford overseeing the implementation of GATT in members' policies. (P. van den Bossche, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, 81; J.H. Jackson, Managing the Trading System, 134).
  25. The GATT Years: from Havana to Marrakesh Archived 11 December 2004 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
  26. Footer, M.E. Analysis of the World Trade Organization, 17.
  27. B.S. Klapper, With a "Short Window" Archived 27 November 2006 at the Wayback Machine
  28. Lula, Time to Get Serious about Agricultural Subsidies Archived 26 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  29. P. Gallagher, The First Ten Years of the WTO, 4
  30. The Uruguay Round Archived 20 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
  31. "Legal texts – Marrakesh agreement". WTO. Archived from the original on 25 May 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  32. including the GATT 1994 and the Trade Related Investment Measures (TRIMS)
  33. Erskine, Daniel (January 2004). ""Resolving Trade Disputes, the Mechanisms of GATT/WTO Dispute Resolution" by Daniel H. Erskine". Santa Clara Journal of International Law. 2 (1): 40. Archived from the original on 16 April 2016. Retrieved 3 April 2016.
  34. Overview: a Navigational Guide Archived 15 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site For the complete list of "The Uruguay Round Agreements", see WTO legal texts Archived 14 December 2005 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site, and Uruguay Round Agreements, Understandings, Decisions and Declarations Archived 27 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine, WorldTradeLaw.net
  35. Principles of the Trading System Archived 11 December 2004 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
  36. "WTO | Ministerial conferences – Eighth WTO Ministerial Conference". Archived from the original on 13 September 2019. Retrieved 28 January 2017.
  37. Farah, Paolo Davide (4 August 2006). "Five Years of China WTO Membership. EU and US Perspectives about China's Compliance with Transparency Commitments and the Transitional Review Mechanism". Papers.ssrn.com. SSRN 916768. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  38. "In the twilight of Doha". The Economist: 65. 27 July 2006. Archived from the original on 12 November 2007. Retrieved 21 May 2010.
  39. European Commission The Doha Round Archived 30 December 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  40. Fergusson ps, Ian F. (18 January 2008). "World Trade Organization Negotiations: The Doha Development Agenda" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 September 2013. Retrieved 26 July 2008.
  41. Documents from the negotiating chairs, 21 April 2011 Archived 10 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine at WTO official website
  42. Bali Ministerial Declaration and decisions Archived 18 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine at WTO official website. Accessed 31 December 2013
  43. Walker, Andrew (7 December 2013). "WTO agrees global trade deal worth $1tn". BBC News. Archived from the original on 7 December 2013. Retrieved 7 December 2013.
  44. "WTO – Understanding the WTO – The Doha agenda". www.wto.org. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
  45. The Challenges to the World Trade Organization: It's All About Legitimacy Archived 2 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine The Brookings Institution, Policy Paper 2011-04
  46. GROUPS IN THE WTO Archived 10 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine Updated 1 July 2013.
  47. Functions of the WTO Archived 27 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine, IISD
  48. Main Functions Archived 30 December 2006 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
  49. A Bredimas, International Economic Law, II, 17
  50. C. Deere, Decision-making in the WTO: Medieval or Up-to-Date?
  51. WTO Assistance for Developing Countries, WTO official site Archived 12 June 2015 at the Wayback Machine
  52. Sinha, Aparijita. Archived 15 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine. "What are the functions and objectives of the WTO?". Retrieved on 13 April 2014.
  53. Economic research and analysis Archived 15 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
  54. B. Hoekman, The WTO: Functions and Basic Principles, 42
  55. B. Hoekman, The WTO: Functions and Basic Principles, 43
  56. B. Hoekman, The WTO: Functions and Basic Principles, 44
  57. "WTO – What is the WTO? – What we stand for". www.wto.org. Archived from the original on 6 June 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
  58. Farah, Paolo Davide and Cima, Elena, World Trade Organization, Renewable Energy Subsidies and the Case of Feed-In Tariffs: Time for Reform Toward Sustainable Development? (1 December 2015). Georgetown International Environmental Law Review (GIELR), Vol. 27, No. 1, 2015. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2704398
  59. "Whose WTO is it anyway?". World Trade Organization. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  60. "WTO Director-General selection process". World Trade Organization. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  61. "Fourth level: down to the nitty-gritty". WTO official site. Archived from the original on 28 September 2008. Retrieved 18 August 2008.
  62. "Intellectual property – overview of TRIPS Agreement". Wto.org. 15 April 1994. Archived from the original on 6 July 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  63. "The Services Council, its Committees and other subsidiary bodies". WTO official site. Archived from the original on 29 September 2008. Retrieved 14 August 2008.
  64. "The Trade Negotiations Committee". WTO official site. Archived from the original on 25 November 2005. Retrieved 14 August 2008.
  65. "WTO organization chart". WTO official site. Archived from the original on 14 August 2008. Retrieved 14 August 2008.
  66. Decision-making Archived 11 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine at WTO official site
  67. Decision-Making in the World Trade Organization Archived 25 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine Abstract from Journal of International Economic Law at Oxford Journals
  68. Steinberg, Richard H. "In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO." International Organization. Spring 2002. pp. 339–74.
  69. "1.2 The Dispute Settlement Understanding". WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 17 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
  70. Stewart-Dawyer, The WTO Dispute Settlement System, 7
  71. S. Panitchpakdi, The WTO at ten, 8.
  72. Settling Disputes:a Unique Contribution Archived 14 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
  73. "3.3 Panels". WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 17 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
  74. "3.1 The Dispute Settlement Body (DSB)". WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 7 April 2015. Retrieved 7 March 2015.
  75. "3.4 Appellate Body". WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 2 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
  76. "3.2 The Director-General and the WTO Secretariat". WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 2 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
  77. "3.5 arbitrators". WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 17 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
  78. "3.6 Experts". WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 17 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
  79. ""Mutually Agreed Solutions" as "Preferred Solution"". WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 17 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
  80. "1.3 Functions, objectives and key features of the dispute settlement system". WTO official website. 2005. Archived from the original on 17 March 2005. Retrieved 7 March 2005.
  81. Johns, Leslie; Pelc, Krzysztof J. (25 April 2018). "Free Riding on Enforcement in the World Trade Organization" (PDF). The Journal of Politics. 80 (3): 873–889. doi:10.1086/697463. ISSN 0022-3816.
  82. Chaudoin, Stephen; Kucik, Jeffrey; Pelc, Krzysztof (15 April 2016). "Do WTO Disputes Actually Increase Trade?". International Studies Quarterly. 60 (2): 294–306. doi:10.1093/isq/sqw009. ISSN 0020-8833.
  83. "A US-less WTO: The first Middle East victims are oil exporters". ameinfo.com. 2 September 2018. Archived from the original on 5 September 2018. Retrieved 5 September 2018.
  84. Accessions Summary Archived 3 February 2007 at the Wayback Machine, Center for International Development
  85. Ministerial Conference approves Russia's WTO membership Archived 7 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine WTO News Item, 16 December 2011
  86. "Kazakhstan". www.wto.org. Archived from the original on 25 April 2016. Retrieved 23 February 2016.
  87. Accession status: Vanuatu Archived 11 August 2012 at the Wayback Machine. WTO. Retrieved on 12 July 2013.
  88. C. Michalopoulos, WTO Accession, 64
  89. Davis, Christina L.; Wilf, Meredith (10 May 2017). "Joining the Club: Accession to the GATT/WTO". The Journal of Politics. 79 (3): 964–978. doi:10.1086/691058. ISSN 0022-3816.
  90. "Summary Table of Ongoing Accessions". World Trade Organization. April 2014. Archived from the original on 29 September 2014. Retrieved 25 October 2014.
  91. Membership, Alliances and Bureaucracy Archived 16 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
  92. C. Michalopoulos, WTO Accession, 62–63
  93. Armenia – WTO Archived 12 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine, www.wto.am
  94. Concluding remarks by the Chairperson Archived 12 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
  95. How to Become a Member of the WTO Archived 13 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine, WTO official site
  96. Napier, Nancy K.; Vuong, Quan Hoang (2013). What we see, why we worry, why we hope: Vietnam going forward. Boise, ID: Boise State University CCI Press. p. 140. ISBN 978-0985530587.
  97. "Members and Observers". World Trade Organization. 24 August 2012. Archived from the original on 10 September 2011. Retrieved 10 September 2011.
  98. "Liberia clears last hurdle to WTO accession | International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development". www.ictsd.org. Archived from the original on 24 June 2016. Retrieved 25 June 2016.
  99. "Afghanistan to become 164th WTO member on 29 July 2016". Archived from the original on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 1 July 2016.
  100. "The European Union and the WTO". World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 24 June 2016. Retrieved 2 August 2016.
  101. Jackson, J.H. Sovereignty, 109
  102. "ROC Government Publication" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 January 2012. Retrieved 12 June 2011.
  103. "Accession in perspective". World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 24 December 2013. Retrieved 22 December 2013.
  104. "Annex 1. Statistical Survey". World Trade Organization. 2005. Archived from the original on 24 December 2013. Retrieved 22 December 2013.
  105. Arjomandy, Danial (21 November 2013). "Iranian Membership in the World Trade Organization: An Unclear Future". Iranian Studies. 47 (6): 933–50. doi:10.1080/00210862.2013.859810.
  106. International intergovernmental organizations granted observer status to WTO bodies Archived 12 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine at WTO official website
  107. "Legal texts – the WTO agreements". WTO. Archived from the original on 24 May 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  108. Understanding the WTO – Intellectual property: protection and enforcement Archived 1 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine. WTO. Retrieved on 29 July 2013.
  109. "A Summary of the Final Act of the Uruguay Round". Wto.org. Archived from the original on 24 May 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
  110. Zarocostas, John (7 December 2013). "Global Trade Deal Reached". WWD. Archived from the original on 11 December 2013. Retrieved 8 December 2013.
  111. "WT/L/509". WTO. Archived from the original on 13 September 2019. Retrieved 18 February 2013.
  112. "Deputy Directors-General". 1 October 2017. Archived from the original on 30 January 2018. Retrieved 13 June 2018.
  113. "Previous GATT and WTO Directors-General". WTO. Archived from the original on 15 October 2012. Retrieved 21 May 2011.
  114. "WTO chief Roberto Azevêdo to step down early". The Financial Times. 14 May 2020.
  115. "Candidates for DG selection process 2020". WHO.
  116. "WTO Secretariat budget for 2019" (PDF). WTO.
  117. Joseph, Sarah; Joseph, Sarah Louise (14 April 2011). Blame it on the WTO?: A Human Rights Critique. OUP Oxford. pp. 164–167. ISBN 978-0-19-956589-4.
  118. "Wayback Machine" (PDF). 8 February 2016. p. 14. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 February 2016. Retrieved 19 May 2020.
  119. Joseph, Sarah; Joseph, Sarah Louise (14 April 2011). Blame it on the WTO?: A Human Rights Critique. OUP Oxford. pp. 171–174. ISBN 978-0-19-956589-4.
  120. Gonzalez, Carmen G. (2002). "Institutionalizing Inequality: The WTO Agreement on Agriculture, Food Security, and Developing Countries". Columbia Journal of Environmental Law. 27: 433–490.
  121. Joseph, Sarah; Joseph, Sarah Louise (14 April 2011). Blame it on the WTO?: A Human Rights Critique. OUP Oxford. pp. 211–213. ISBN 978-0-19-956589-4.
  122. Nicita, Alessandro; Olarreaga, Marcelo; Silva, Peri da (5 April 2018). "A trade war will increase average tariffs by 32 percentage points". VoxEU.org. Archived from the original on 27 April 2018. Retrieved 27 April 2018.
  123. Bechtel, Michael M.; Sattler, Thomas (2015). "What Is Litigation in the World Trade Organization Worth?". International Organization. 69 (2): 375–403. doi:10.1017/S002081831400037X. ISSN 0020-8183.
  124. Shin, Wonkyu; Ahn, Dukgeun (2019). "Trade Gains from Legal Rulings in the WTO Dispute Settlement System". World Trade Review. 18 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1017/S1474745617000544. ISSN 1474-7456.
  125. Bown, Chad P. (2004). "On the Economic Success of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement". The Review of Economics and Statistics. 86 (3): 811–823. doi:10.1162/0034653041811680.
  126. Bown, Chad P. (2004). "Trade Policy under the GATT/WTO: Empirical Evidence of the Equal Treatment Rule". The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d'Economique. 37 (3): 678–720. doi:10.1111/j.0008-4085.2004.00243.x. ISSN 0008-4085. JSTOR 3696011.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.