China and the World Trade Organization

China became a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO) on 11 December 2001,[1] after the agreement of the Ministerial Conference.[2] The admission of China to the WTO was preceded by a lengthy process of negotiations and required significant changes to the Chinese economy.

China
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
China
Foreign relations
 China portal

Background

Until the 1970s, China’s economy was managed by the communist government and was kept closed from other economies. Together with political reforms, China in the early 1980s began to open its economy and signed a number of regional trade agreements. China gained observer status with GATT and from 1986, began working towards joining that organization. China aimed to be included as a WTO founding member (which would validate it as a world economic power) but this attempt was thwarted because the United States, European countries, and Japan requested that China first reform various tariff policies, including tariff reductions, open markets and industrial policies.

Preparations

After the 1997 Asian financial crisis, China sold off or merged many unprofitable state-owned enterprises. In 1998, China reformed the State Council to greatly reduce the mandate of the State Planning Commission and increase the mandate of the State Economic and Trade Commission. This shift also corresponded to the change in premiership from Li Peng to Zhu Rongji, the latter of whom strongly believed that China needed deeper economic restructuring. This restructuring, which had been happening since the 1980s, included crackdowns on corruption and the establishment of chambers of commerce.[3]

United States' role

Formal diplomatic relations between the United States and the People's Republic of China were not established until 1979, and even afterwards, trade relations were hampered by the high tariff rates of the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act of 1930. After the two governments settled asset claims dating from the Korean War in 1950, Congress temporarily granted China most favored nation status in 1980. However, Chinese-American trade was still hindered by the Jackson–Vanik amendment of 1974, which made trade with the United States contingent on certain human rights metrics. The Jackson–Vanik restrictions could not apply, however, to WTO members, because of WTO rules that prohibit this kind of discrimination.[4]

By 1984, the United States had become China's third-largest trading partner, and China became America's 14th largest. However, the annual renewal of China's MFN status was constantly challenged by anti-Chinese pressure groups during US congressional hearings. For example, U.S. imports from China almost doubled within five years from $51.5 billion in 1996 to $102 billion in 2001.[5] The American textile industry lobbied Congress for, and received, tariffs on Chinese textiles according to the WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing. In reaction to the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests' suppression, the Bush I administration and Congress imposed administrative and legal constraints on investment, exports, and other trade relations with China.[4]

The Clinton presidency from 1992 started with an executive order (128590) that linked renewal of China's MFN status with seven human rights conditions, including "preservation of Tibetan indigenous religion and culture" and "access to prisons for international human rights organizations"—Clinton reversed this position a year later. Other challenges to Sino-American relations in this decade included the Cox Committee investigations against supposed nonprofit involvement in "promoting communism", the persecution of Taiwanese-American scientist Wen Ho Lee for unproven allegations of espionage for the PRC, and the 1999 United States bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade. But relations warmed after the September 2001 initiation by George W. Bush of the War on Terror.[6]

Conditions

These changes were difficult steps for China and conflicted with its prior economic strategy. Accession meant that China would engage in global competition according to rules that it did not make. China's admission was "an enormous multilateral achievement" that marked a clear commitment towards multilateralism.[7]

When China joined the WTO, it agreed to considerably harsher conditions than other developing countries.[8] After China joined the World Trade Organization (WTO), its service sector was considerably liberalized and foreign investment was allowed; its restrictions on retail, wholesale and distribution ended.[9] Banking, financial services, insurance and telecommunications in China were also opened up to foreign investment.[10] Furthermore, China had to deal with certain concerns linked to transparency and intellectual property that the accession to WTO underlined.[11][12]

  • Hong Kong had been admitted as a WTO member on 1 January 1995, before Hong Kong was handed over to China in 1997.
gollark: I changed at least 10 lines of code today.
gollark: I'm FAR too busy with minoteaur.
gollark: Is this secretly a roguelike?
gollark: No, 40ish minutes ago.
gollark: I was just using FTS incorrectly.

See also

References
  1. "WTO | Accessions: China". www.wto.org. Retrieved 2018-08-06.
  2. WT/L/432, # 01-5996 (23 November 2001). "Accession of the People's Republic of China - Decision of 10 November 2001". World Trade Organization.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  3. Fewsmith, Joseph (2001). "The Political and Social Implications of China's Accession to the WTO" (PDF). The China Quarterly. 167. doi:10.1017/S0009443901000328.
  4. Kent, Ann (2001). "States Monitoring States: The United States, Australia, and China's Human Rights, 1990-2001" (PDF). Human Rights Quarterly. The Johns Hopkins University Press. 23 (3): 583–624. doi:10.1353/hrq.2001.0037.
  5. "Foreign Trade - U.S. Trade with China". Census.gov. Retrieved 2012-07-06.
  6. Wang, Dong (2011). "China's Trade Relations with the United States in Perspective". Journal of Current Chinese Affairs. German Institute of Global and Area Studies. 39 (3): 165–210. doi:10.1177/186810261003900307.
  7. Schumpeter Business and management (5 December 2011). "Money talks: An enormous multilateral achievement". The Economist. Retrieved 2012-07-06.
  8. Bransetter, Lee (2008), "China's embrace of globalization", in Brandt, Loren; Rawski, G. Thomas (eds.), China's Great Transformation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 655
  9. Branstetter 2008, p. 657
  10. Branstetter 2008, pp. 658–659
  11. Farah, Paolo Davide; Cima, Elena. China's Participation in the World Trade Organization: Trade in Goods, Services, Intellectual Property Rights, and Transparency Issues. SSRN 1527992.
  12. Farah, Paolo Davide; Cima, Elena (Spring 2010). "The Implementation of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) in China". Tsinghua China Law Review. 2: 317–351. SSRN 1679999.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.