Erythropoietin receptor

The erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) is a protein that in humans is encoded by the EPOR gene.[5] EpoR is a 52kDa peptide with a single carbohydrate chain resulting in a n approximately 56-57 kDa protein found on the surface of EPO responding cells. It is a member of the cytokine receptor family. EpoR pre-exists as dimers [6] which upon binding of a 30 kDa ligand erythropoietin (Epo), changes its homodimerized state. These conformational changes result in the autophosphorylation of Jak2 kinases that are pre-associated with the receptor (i.e., EpoR does not possess intrinsic kinase activity and depends on Jak2 activity).[7][8] At present, the most well-established function of EpoR is to promote proliferation and rescue of erythroid (red blood cell) progenitors from apoptosis.[5]

EPOR
Available structures
PDBOrtholog search: PDBe RCSB
Identifiers
AliasesEPOR, EPO-R, erythropoietin receptor
External IDsOMIM: 133171 MGI: 95408 HomoloGene: 95 GeneCards: EPOR
Gene location (Human)
Chr.Chromosome 19 (human)[1]
Band19p13.2Start11,377,207 bp[1]
End11,384,342 bp[1]
RNA expression pattern




More reference expression data
Orthologs
SpeciesHumanMouse
Entrez

2057

13857

Ensembl

ENSG00000187266

ENSMUSG00000006235

UniProt

P19235

P14753

RefSeq (mRNA)

NM_000121

NM_010149

RefSeq (protein)

NP_000112

NP_034279

Location (UCSC)Chr 19: 11.38 – 11.38 MbChr 9: 21.96 – 21.96 Mb
PubMed search[3][4]
Wikidata
View/Edit HumanView/Edit Mouse

Function and mechanism of action
Murine Epo Receptor truncations and known functions. Erythroid differentiation depends on transcriptional regulator GATA1. EpoR is thought to contribute to differentiation via multiple signaling pathways including the STAT5 pathway. In erythropoiesis, EpoR is best known for inducing survival of progenitors.

The cytoplasmic domains of the EpoR contain a number of phosphotyrosines that are phosphorylated by Jak2 and serve as docking sites for a variety of intracellular pathway activators and Stats (such as Stat5). In addition to activating Ras/AKT and ERK/MAP kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT pathway and STAT transcription factors, phosphotyrosines also serve as docking sites for phosphatases that negatively affect EpoR signaling in order to prevent overactivation that may lead to such disorders as erythrocytosis. In general, the defects in the erythropoietin receptor may produce erythroleukemia and familial erythrocytosis. Mutations in Jak2 kinases associated with EpoR can also lead to polycythemia vera.[9]

Erythroid survival

Primary role of EpoR is to promote proliferation of erythroid progenitor cells and rescue erythroid progenitors from cell death.[10] EpoR induced Jak2-Stat5 signaling, together with transcriptional factor GATA-1, induces the transcription of pro-survival protein Bcl-xL.[11] Additionally, EpoR has been implicated in suppressing expression of death receptors Fas, Trail and TNFa that negatively affect erythropoiesis.[12][13][14]

Based on current evidence, it is still unknown whether Epo/EpoR directly cause "proliferation and differentiation" of erythroid progenitors in vivo, although such direct effects have been described based on in vitro work.

Erythroid differentiation

It is thought that erythroid differentiation is primarily dependent on the presence and induction of erythroid transcriptional factors such as GATA-1, FOG-1 and EKLF, as well as the suppression of myeloid/lymphoid transcriptional factors such as PU.1.[15] Direct and significant effects of EpoR signaling specifically upon the induction of erythroid-specific genes such as beta-globin, have been mainly elusive. It is known that GATA-1 can induce EpoR expression.[16] In turn, EpoR's PI3-K/AKT signaling pathway augments GATA-1 activity.[17]

Erythroid cell cycle/proliferation

Induction of proliferation by the EpoR is likely cell type-dependent. It is known that EpoR can activate mitogenic signaling pathways and can lead to cell proliferation in erythroleukemic cell lines in vitro, various non-erythroid cells, and cancer cells. So far, there is no sufficient evidence that in vivo, EpoR signaling can induce erythroid progenitors to undergo cell division, or whether Epo levels can modulate the cell cycle.[10] EpoR signaling may still have a proliferation effect upon BFU-e progenitors, but these progenitors cannot be directly identified, isolated and studied. CFU-e progenitors enter the cell cycle at the time of GATA-1 induction and PU.1 suppression in a developmental manner rather than due to EpoR signaling.[18] Subsequent differentiation stages (proerythroblast to orthochromatic erythroblast) involve a decrease in cell size and eventual expulsion of the nucleus, and are likely dependent upon EpoR signaling only for their survival. In addition, some evidence on macrocytosis in hypoxic stress (when Epo can increase 1000-fold) suggests that mitosis is actually skipped in later erythroid stages, when EpoR expression is low/absent, in order to provide emergency reserve of red blood cells as soon as possible.[19][20] Such data, though sometimes circumstantial, argue that there is limited capacity to proliferate specifically in response to Epo (and not other factors). Together, these data suggest that EpoR in erythroid differentiation may function primarily as a survival factor, while its effect on the cell cycle (for example, rate of division and corresponding changes in the levels of cyclins and Cdk inhibitors) in vivo awaits further work. In other cell systems, however, EpoR may provide a specific proliferative signal.

Commitment of multipotent progenitors to the erythroid lineage

EpoR's role in lineage commitment is currently unclear. EpoR expression can extend as far back as the hematopoietic stem cell compartment.[21] It is unknown whether EpoR signaling plays a permissive (i.e. induces only survival) or an instructive (i.e. upregulates erythroid markers to lock progenitors to a predetermined differentiation path) role in early, multipotent progenitors in order to produce sufficient erythroblast numbers. Current publications in the field suggest that it is primarily permissive. The generation of BFU-e and CFU-e progenitors was shown to be normal in rodent embryos knocked out for either Epo or EpoR.[22] An argument against such lack of requirement is that in response to Epo or hypoxic stress, the number of early erythroid stages, the BFU-e and CFU-e, increases dramatically. However, it is unclear if it is an instructive signal or, again, a permissive signal. One additional point is that signaling pathways activated by the EpoR are common to many other receptors; replacing EpoR with prolactin receptor supports erythroid survival and differentiation in vitro.[23][24] Together, these data suggest that commitment to erythroid lineage likely does not happen due to EpoR's as-yet-unknown instructive function, but possibly due to its role in survival at the multipotent progenitor stages.

Animal studies on Epo Receptor mutations

Mice with truncated EpoR[25] are viable, which suggests Jak2 activity is sufficient to support basal erythropoiesis by activating the necessary pathways without phosphotyrosine docking sites being needed. EpoR-H form of EpoR truncation contains the first, and, what can be argued, the most important tyrosine 343 that serves as a docking site for the Stat5 molecule, but lacks the rest of the cytoplasmic tail. These mice exhibit elevated erythropoiesis consistent with the idea that phosphatase recruitment (and therefore the shutting down of signaling) is aberrant in these mice.

The EpoR-HM receptor also lacks the majority of the cytoplasmic domain, and contains the tyrosine 343 that was mutated to phenylalanine, making it unsuitable for efficient Stat5 docking and activation. These mice are anemic and show poor response to hypoxic stress, such as phenylhydrazine treatment or erythropoietin injection.[25]

EpoR knockout mice have defects in heart, brain and the vasculature. These defects may be due to blocks in RBC formation and thus insufficient oxygen delivery to developing tissues because mice engineered to express Epo receptors only in erythroid cells develop normally.

Clinical significance

Defects in the erythropoietin receptor may produce erythroleukemia and familial erythrocytosis.[5] Overproduction of red blood cells increases a chance of adverse cardiovascular event, such as thrombosis and stroke.

Rarely, seemingly beneficial mutations in the EpoR may arise, where increased red blood cell number allows for improved oxygen delivery in athletic endurance events with no apparent adverse effects upon the athlete's health (as for example in the Finnish athlete Eero Mäntyranta).[26]

Erythropoietin was reported to maintain endothelial cells and to promote tumor angiogenesis, hence the dysregulation of EpoR may affect the growth of certain tumors.[27][28] However this hypothesis is not universally accepted.

Interactions

Erythropoietin receptor has been shown to interact with:

gollark: The margins of error aren't THAT narrow or the Earth would have burned up by now.
gollark: That would imply that you'd burn horribly if you jumped or went up mountains or something.
gollark: What?
gollark: Lots of things could destroy the earth, yes. Just not nuclear war.
gollark: Nuclear war is not capable of destroying the Earth, as it's quite big. A 999-magnitude earthquake would probably, as it is a log scale.

References
  1. GRCh38: Ensembl release 89: ENSG00000187266 - Ensembl, May 2017
  2. GRCm38: Ensembl release 89: ENSMUSG00000006235 - Ensembl, May 2017
  3. "Human PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  4. "Mouse PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  5. "Entrez Gene: EPOR erythropoietin receptor".
  6. Livnah O, Stura EA, Middleton SA, Johnson DL, Jolliffe LK, Wilson IA (Feb 1999). "Crystallographic evidence for preformed dimers of erythropoietin receptor before ligand activation". Science. 283 (5404): 987–90. doi:10.1126/science.283.5404.987. PMID 9974392.
  7. Youssoufian H, Longmore G, Neumann D, Yoshimura A, Lodish HF (May 1993). "Structure, function, and activation of the erythropoietin receptor". Blood. 81 (9): 2223–36. doi:10.1182/blood.V81.9.2223.2223. PMID 8481505.
  8. Wilson IA, Jolliffe LK (Dec 1999). "The structure, organization, activation and plasticity of the erythropoietin receptor". Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 9 (6): 696–704. doi:10.1016/S0959-440X(99)00032-9. PMID 10607675.
  9. James C, Ugo V, Le Couédic JP, Staerk J, Delhommeau F, Lacout C, Garçon L, Raslova H, Berger R, Bennaceur-Griscelli A, Villeval JL, Constantinescu SN, Casadevall N, Vainchenker W (Apr 2005). "A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera". Nature. 434 (7037): 1144–8. doi:10.1038/nature03546. PMID 15793561.
  10. Koury MJ, Bondurant MC (Apr 1990). "Erythropoietin retards DNA breakdown and prevents programmed death in erythroid progenitor cells". Science. 248 (4953): 378–81. doi:10.1126/science.2326648. PMID 2326648.
  11. Socolovsky M, Fallon AE, Wang S, Brugnara C, Lodish HF (Jul 1999). "Fetal anemia and apoptosis of red cell progenitors in Stat5a-/-5b-/- mice: a direct role for Stat5 in Bcl-X(L) induction". Cell. 98 (2): 181–91. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81013-2. PMID 10428030.
  12. De Maria R, Testa U, Luchetti L, Zeuner A, Stassi G, Pelosi E, Riccioni R, Felli N, Samoggia P, Peschle C (Feb 1999). "Apoptotic role of Fas/Fas ligand system in the regulation of erythropoiesis". Blood. 93 (3): 796–803. doi:10.1182/blood.V93.3.796. PMID 9920828.
  13. Liu Y, Pop R, Sadegh C, Brugnara C, Haase VH, Socolovsky M (Jul 2006). "Suppression of Fas-FasL coexpression by erythropoietin mediates erythroblast expansion during the erythropoietic stress response in vivo". Blood. 108 (1): 123–33. doi:10.1182/blood-2005-11-4458. PMC 1895827. PMID 16527892.
  14. Felli N, Pedini F, Zeuner A, Petrucci E, Testa U, Conticello C, Biffoni M, Di Cataldo A, Winkles JA, Peschle C, De Maria R (Aug 2005). "Multiple members of the TNF superfamily contribute to IFN-gamma-mediated inhibition of erythropoiesis". Journal of Immunology. 175 (3): 1464–72. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.175.3.1464. PMID 16034083.
  15. Cantor AB, Orkin SH (May 2002). "Transcriptional regulation of erythropoiesis: an affair involving multiple partners". Oncogene. 21 (21): 3368–76. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1205326. PMID 12032775.
  16. Zon LI, Youssoufian H, Mather C, Lodish HF, Orkin SH (Dec 1991). "Activation of the erythropoietin receptor promoter by transcription factor GATA-1". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 88 (23): 10638–41. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.23.10638. PMC 52985. PMID 1660143.
  17. Zhao W, Kitidis C, Fleming MD, Lodish HF, Ghaffari S (Feb 2006). "Erythropoietin stimulates phosphorylation and activation of GATA-1 via the PI3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway". Blood. 107 (3): 907–15. doi:10.1182/blood-2005-06-2516. PMC 1895894. PMID 16204311.
  18. Pop R, Shearstone JR, Shen Q, Liu Y, Hallstrom K, Koulnis M, Gribnau J, Socolovsky M (2010). "A key commitment step in erythropoiesis is synchronized with the cell cycle clock through mutual inhibition between PU.1 and S-phase progression". PLoS Biology. 8 (9): e1000484. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000484. PMC 2943437. PMID 20877475.
  19. Seno S, Miyahara M, Asakura H, Ochi O, Matsuoka K, Toyama T (Nov 1964). "Macrocytosis Resulting from Early Denucleation of Erythroid Precursors". Blood. 24 (5): 582–93. doi:10.1182/blood.V24.5.582.582. PMID 14236733.
  20. Borsook H, Lingrel JB, Scaro JL, Millette RL (Oct 1962). "Synthesis of haemoglobin in relation to the maturation of erythroid cells". Nature. 196 (4852): 347–50. doi:10.1038/196347a0. PMID 14014098.
  21. Forsberg EC, Serwold T, Kogan S, Weissman IL, Passegué E (Jul 2006). "New evidence supporting megakaryocyte-erythrocyte potential of flk2/flt3+ multipotent hematopoietic progenitors". Cell. 126 (2): 415–26. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.037. PMID 16873070.
  22. Wu H, Liu X, Jaenisch R, Lodish HF (Oct 1995). "Generation of committed erythroid BFU-E and CFU-E progenitors does not require erythropoietin or the erythropoietin receptor". Cell. 83 (1): 59–67. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90234-1. PMID 7553874.
  23. Socolovsky M, Fallon AE, Lodish HF (Sep 1998). "The prolactin receptor rescues EpoR-/- erythroid progenitors and replaces EpoR in a synergistic interaction with c-kit". Blood. 92 (5): 1491–6. doi:10.1182/blood.V92.5.1491. PMID 9716574.
  24. Socolovsky M, Dusanter-Fourt I, Lodish HF (May 1997). "The prolactin receptor and severely truncated erythropoietin receptors support differentiation of erythroid progenitors". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 272 (22): 14009–12. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.22.14009. PMID 9162017.
  25. Zang H, Sato K, Nakajima H, McKay C, Ney PA, Ihle JN (Jun 2001). "The distal region and receptor tyrosines of the Epo receptor are non-essential for in vivo erythropoiesis". The EMBO Journal. 20 (12): 3156–66. doi:10.1093/emboj/20.12.3156. PMC 150206. PMID 11406592.
  26. de la Chapelle A, Träskelin AL, Juvonen E (May 1993). "Truncated erythropoietin receptor causes dominantly inherited benign human erythrocytosis". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 90 (10): 4495–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.10.4495. PMC 46538. PMID 8506290.
  27. Farrell F, Lee A (2004). "The erythropoietin receptor and its expression in tumor cells and other tissues". The Oncologist. 9 Suppl 5: 18–30. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.9-90005-18. PMID 15591419.
  28. Jelkmann W, Bohlius J, Hallek M, Sytkowski AJ (Jul 2008). "The erythropoietin receptor in normal and cancer tissues". Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 67 (1): 39–61. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.03.006. PMID 18434185.
  29. Chin H, Saito T, Arai A, Yamamoto K, Kamiyama R, Miyasaka N, Miura O (Oct 1997). "Erythropoietin and IL-3 induce tyrosine phosphorylation of CrkL and its association with Shc, SHP-2, and Cbl in hematopoietic cells". Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 239 (2): 412–7. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1997.7480. PMID 9344843.
  30. Arai A, Kanda E, Nosaka Y, Miyasaka N, Miura O (Aug 2001). "CrkL is recruited through its SH2 domain to the erythropoietin receptor and plays a role in Lyn-mediated receptor signaling". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 276 (35): 33282–90. doi:10.1074/jbc.M102924200. PMID 11443118.
  31. Middleton SA, Barbone FP, Johnson DL, Thurmond RL, You Y, McMahon FJ, Jin R, Livnah O, Tullai J, Farrell FX, Goldsmith MA, Wilson IA, Jolliffe LK (May 1999). "Shared and unique determinants of the erythropoietin (EPO) receptor are important for binding EPO and EPO mimetic peptide". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 274 (20): 14163–9. doi:10.1074/jbc.274.20.14163. PMID 10318834.
  32. Livnah O, Johnson DL, Stura EA, Farrell FX, Barbone FP, You Y, Liu KD, Goldsmith MA, He W, Krause CD, Pestka S, Jolliffe LK, Wilson IA (Nov 1998). "An antagonist peptide-EPO receptor complex suggests that receptor dimerization is not sufficient for activation". Nature Structural Biology. 5 (11): 993–1004. doi:10.1038/2965. PMID 9808045.
  33. Tauchi T, Feng GS, Shen R, Hoatlin M, Bagby GC, Kabat D, Lu L, Broxmeyer HE (Mar 1995). "Involvement of SH2-containing phosphotyrosine phosphatase Syp in erythropoietin receptor signal transduction pathways". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 270 (10): 5631–5. doi:10.1074/jbc.270.10.5631. PMID 7534299.
  34. Feng GS, Ouyang YB, Hu DP, Shi ZQ, Gentz R, Ni J (May 1996). "Grap is a novel SH3-SH2-SH3 adaptor protein that couples tyrosine kinases to the Ras pathway". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 271 (21): 12129–32. doi:10.1074/jbc.271.21.12129. PMID 8647802.
  35. Huang LJ, Constantinescu SN, Lodish HF (Dec 2001). "The N-terminal domain of Janus kinase 2 is required for Golgi processing and cell surface expression of erythropoietin receptor". Molecular Cell. 8 (6): 1327–38. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00401-4. PMID 11779507.
  36. Witthuhn BA, Quelle FW, Silvennoinen O, Yi T, Tang B, Miura O, Ihle JN (Jul 1993). "JAK2 associates with the erythropoietin receptor and is tyrosine phosphorylated and activated following stimulation with erythropoietin". Cell. 74 (2): 227–36. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90414-L. PMID 8343951.
  37. Chin H, Arai A, Wakao H, Kamiyama R, Miyasaka N, Miura O (May 1998). "Lyn physically associates with the erythropoietin receptor and may play a role in activation of the Stat5 pathway". Blood. 91 (10): 3734–45. doi:10.1182/blood.V91.10.3734. PMID 9573010.
  38. Shigematsu H, Iwasaki H, Otsuka T, Ohno Y, Arima F, Niho Y (May 1997). "Role of the vav proto-oncogene product (Vav) in erythropoietin-mediated cell proliferation and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 272 (22): 14334–40. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.22.14334. PMID 9162069.
  39. Damen JE, Cutler RL, Jiao H, Yi T, Krystal G (Oct 1995). "Phosphorylation of tyrosine 503 in the erythropoietin receptor (EpR) is essential for binding the P85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase and for EpR-associated PI 3-kinase activity". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 270 (40): 23402–8. doi:10.1074/jbc.270.40.23402. PMID 7559499.
  40. Klingmüller U, Lorenz U, Cantley LC, Neel BG, Lodish HF (Mar 1995). "Specific recruitment of SH-PTP1 to the erythropoietin receptor causes inactivation of JAK2 and termination of proliferative signals". Cell. 80 (5): 729–38. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90351-8. PMID 7889566.
  41. Eyckerman S, Verhee A, der Heyden JV, Lemmens I, Ostade XV, Vandekerckhove J, Tavernier J (Dec 2001). "Design and application of a cytokine-receptor-based interaction trap". Nature Cell Biology. 3 (12): 1114–9. doi:10.1038/ncb1201-1114. PMID 11781573.
  42. Sasaki A, Yasukawa H, Shouda T, Kitamura T, Dikic I, Yoshimura A (Sep 2000). "CIS3/SOCS-3 suppresses erythropoietin (EPO) signaling by binding the EPO receptor and JAK2". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 275 (38): 29338–47. doi:10.1074/jbc.M003456200. PMID 10882725.
  43. Hörtner M, Nielsch U, Mayr LM, Heinrich PC, Haan S (May 2002). "A new high affinity binding site for suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 on the erythropoietin receptor". European Journal of Biochemistry / FEBS. 269 (10): 2516–26. doi:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.02916.x. PMID 12027890.
  44. Chin H, Nakamura N, Kamiyama R, Miyasaka N, Ihle JN, Miura O (Dec 1996). "Physical and functional interactions between Stat5 and the tyrosine-phosphorylated receptors for erythropoietin and interleukin-3". Blood. 88 (12): 4415–25. doi:10.1182/blood.V88.12.4415.bloodjournal88124415. PMID 8977232.

Further reading

This article incorporates text from the United States National Library of Medicine, which is in the public domain.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.