Japanese-Language Proficiency Test

The Japanese-Language Proficiency Test (日本語能力試験, Nihongo Nōryoku Shiken), or JLPT, is a standardized criterion-referenced test to evaluate and certify Japanese language proficiency for non-native speakers, covering language knowledge, reading ability, and listening ability.[1] The test is held twice a year in Japan and selected countries (on the first Sunday of July and December), and once a year in other regions (on the first Sunday of December).[2]

Japanese-Language Proficiency Test
AcronymJLPT
TypeLanguage proficiency test
Year started1984
LanguagesJapanese
Websitewww.jlpt.jp

The JLPT consists of five levels.[3] Until 2009, the test had four levels, with 4 being the lowest and 1 being the highest level of certification.[4] JLPT certificates do not expire or become invalid over time.[5]

History

The JLPT was first held in 1984 in response to growing demand for standardized Japanese language certification.[6] Initially 7,000 people took the test.[7] Until 2003, the JLPT was one of the requirements for foreigners entering Japanese universities. Since 2003, the Examination for Japanese University Admission for International Students (EJU) is used by most universities for this purpose;[8] unlike the JLPT, which is solely a multiple-choice exam, the EJU contains sections which require the examinee to write in Japanese.

Statistics

In 2004, the JLPT was offered in 40 countries, including Japan. Of the 302,198 examinees in that year, 47% (around 140,000) were certified for their respective level.[9] The number of candidates continued to rise to 559,056 in 2008, while the percentage of candidates certified has fallen below 36%. In 2009, when a revised system was introduced in which two exams are held each year in East Asia, a total of 768,114 people took the exam.[10] In 2010, 610,000 people took the test.[11]

By country

Top 10 countries with the most test takers:

Country Number of examinees (2018)[12]
 Japan 195,754
 China 118,912
 South Korea 41,972
 Taiwan 37,804
 Vietnam 35,854
 Myanmar 16,923
 Thailand 14,664
 Indonesia 11,868
 India 11,707
 Philippines 9,572

By city

Top 10 cities with the most test takers:

City or prefecture Country Number of examinees (2018)[12]
Tokyo  Japan 49,369
Taipei  Taiwan 18,033
Hanoi  Vietnam 17,526
Osaka  Japan 16,293
Aichi  Japan 16,609
Seoul  South Korea 15,513
Ho Chi Minh  Vietnam 14,909
Yangon  Myanmar 14,377
Chiba  Japan 13,834
Kanagawa  Japan 13,790

Acceptance in Japan
  • Test takers who pass JLPT N1 receive 15 points, and who pass JLPT N2 receive 10 points under the government's "Point-based Preferential Immigration Treatment System for Highly Skilled Foreign Professionals." Individuals with a total of 70 points or higher receive preferential treatment at immigration.[13]
  • N1 is a prerequisite for foreign medical professionals who wish to take examinations to be licensed in Japan, and for certain foreign nationals who wish to attend nursing school in Japan.[14]
  • Those who have passed either N1 or N2 (regardless of citizenship) are exempt from the Japanese language section of the middle school equivalency examination, which is required in order to enter a Japanese high school if the applicant did not graduate from a Japanese middle school.[15]
  • N1 is sometimes accepted in lieu of the Examination for Japanese University Admission for foreign students who wish to study at Japanese universities.
  • One of the requirements for the nurse/caregiver candidates under the EPA. Under the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) with Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam, a JLPT certificate is required for Indonesian, Filipino (approximately Level N5 or higher), and Vietnamese (Level N3 or higher) nurse or caregiver candidates who visit Japan.

Administration

In Japan, the JLPT is administered by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) through the Japan Educational Exchanges and Services (JEES).[17] Overseas, the Japan Foundation co-proctors test administration with local cultural exchange and/or educational institutions, or with committees specially established for this purpose.[18][19]

Test format

The revised test pattern was implemented in 2010. The test consists of five levels: N1, N2, N3, N4, and N5, with N1 being the highest level and N5 the lowest. No Test Content Specification is published as it is discouraged to study from kanji and vocabulary lists.[20]

LevelA summary of linguistic competence required for each level
N1Advanced Level: The ability to understand Japanese used in a variety of circumstances.

Reading

One is able to read writings with logical complexity and/or abstract writings on a variety of topics, such as newspaper editorials and critiques, and comprehend both their structures and contents. One is also able to read written materials with profound contents on various topics and follow their narratives as well as understand the intent of the writers comprehensively.

Listening

One is able to comprehend orally presented materials such as coherent conversations, news reports, and lectures, spoken at natural speed in a broad variety of settings, and is able to follow their ideas and comprehend their contents comprehensively. One is also able to understand the details of the presented materials such as the relationships among the people involved, the logical structures, and the essential points.

N2Pre-Advanced Level: The ability to understand Japanese used in everyday situations, and in a variety of circumstances to a certain degree.

Reading

One is able to read materials written clearly on a variety of topics, such as articles and commentaries in newspapers and magazines as well as simple critiques, and comprehend their contents. One is also able to read written materials on general topics and follow their narratives as well as understand the intent of the writers.

Listening

One is able to comprehend orally presented materials such as coherent conversations and news reports, spoken at nearly natural speed in everyday situations as well as in a variety of settings, and is able to follow their ideas and comprehend their contents. One is also able to understand the relationships among the people involved and the essential points of the presented materials.

N3Intermediate Level: The ability to understand Japanese used in everyday situations to a certain degree.

Reading

One is able to read and understand written materials with specific contents concerning everyday topics. One is also able to grasp summary information such as newspaper headlines. In addition, one is also able to read slightly difficult writings encountered in everyday situations and understand the main points of the content if some alternative phrases are available to aid one's understanding.

Listening

One is able to listen and comprehend coherent conversations in everyday situations, spoken at near-natural speed, and is generally able to follow their contents as well as grasp the relationships among the people involved.

N4Elementary Level: The ability to understand basic Japanese.

Reading

One is able to read and understand passages on familiar daily topics written in basic vocabulary and kanji.

Listening

One is able to listen and comprehend conversations encountered in daily life and generally follow their contents, provided that they are spoken slowly.

N5Basic Level: The ability to understand some basic Japanese.

Reading

One is able to read and understand typical expressions and sentences written in hiragana, katakana, and basic kanji.

Listening

One is able to listen and comprehend conversations about topics regularly encountered in daily life and classroom situations, and is able to pick up necessary information from short conversations spoken slowly.

Scoring

Passing is based on scaled scores calculated using item-response theory—raw scores are not directly used to determine passing, nor are they reported, except in rough form in the "Reference Information" section.[20] Raw scores are converted to a standard scale, so that equivalent performance on tests from different years and different levels of difficulty yields the same scaled score. The scaled scores are reported, broken down by section, and these are the scores used to determine passing.

In addition, a "Reference Information" section is provided on the report card; this is purely informational – for the examinee's future studies – and is not used in determining if an examinee has passed. The grade given is based on the raw score, and is either A, B, or C, accordingly as the raw score was 67% or above, between 34% and 66%, or below 34%. This reference information is given for vocabulary, grammar, and reading on the N4 and N5, and for vocabulary and grammar (but not reading) on the N1, N2, and N3. In both cases, this breaks down the score on the "Language Knowledge" section into separate skills, but in neither case is performance on the listening section analyzed.

Pass marks

Passing the test requires both achieving an overall pass mark for the total points, and passing each section individually; these are based on the scaled scores. The sectional scores are to ensure that skills are not unbalanced – so one cannot pass by doing well on the written section but poorly on the listening section, for instance. The overall pass mark depends on the level and varies between 100/180 (55.55%) for the N1 and 80/180 (44.44%) for the N5. The pass marks for individual sections are all 19/60 = 31.67% – equivalently, 38/120 = 19/60 for the large section on the N4 and N5. Note that the sectional pass levels are below the overall pass level, at 31.67% instead of 44.44%–55.55%: one need not achieve the overall pass level on each section. These standards were adopted starting in July 2010, and do not vary from year to year, with the scaling instead varying.

Pass marks for individual sections[21]
LevelOverall pass markLanguage Knowledge
(Vocabulary/Grammar)		ReadingListening
N1 100 points 19 points 19 points 19 points
N2 90 points 19 points 19 points 19 points
N3 95 points 19 points 19 points 19 points
Total possible 180 points 60 points 60 points 60 points
N4 90 points 38 points 19 points
N5 80 points 38 points 19 points
Total possible 180 points 120 points 60 points

Test sections
Level Test section[22]
(test time)		 Total duration
N1 Language Knowledge (Vocabulary/Grammar)・Reading
(110 min)		 Listening
(60 min)		 170 min
N2 Language Knowledge (Vocabulary/Grammar)・Reading
(105 min)		 Listening
(50 min)		 155 min
N3 Language Knowledge (Vocabulary)
(30 min)		 Language Knowledge (Grammar)・Reading
(70 min)		 Listening
(40 min)		 140 min
N4 Language Knowledge (Vocabulary)
(30 min)		 Language Knowledge (Grammar)・Reading
(60 min)		 Listening
(35 min)		 125 min
N5 Language Knowledge (Vocabulary)
(25 min)		 Language Knowledge (Grammar)・Reading
(50 min)		 Listening
(30 min)		 105 min
  • Note: "Vocabulary" includes kanji and vocabulary (previous 文字・語彙)

Estimated study time

Study hour comparison data for students residing in Japan, published by the Japanese Language Education Center:

JLPT Study Hour Comparison Data 2010-2015[23]
Level Students with kanji knowledge　

(e.g. speakers of Chinese)

 Other students

(no prior kanji knowledge)

N1 1700–2600 hours 3000–4800 hours
N2 1150–1800 hours 1600–2800 hours
N3 700–1100 hours 950–1700 hours
N4 400–700 hours 575–1000 hours
N5 250–450 hours 325–600 hours

Older edition

The following table shows the 2004 edition used until 2009.

Test content summary Numbers in brackets indicate the exact number in the Test Content Specification, 2004 edition.
Level Kanji Vocabulary Listening Hours of Study Pass Mark
4 ~100 (103) ~800 (728) Beginner 150 (estimated) 60%
3 ~300 (284) ~1,500 (1409) Basic 300 (estimated)
2 ~1000 (1023) ~6,000 (5035) Intermediate 600 (estimated)
1 ~2000 (1926) ~10,000 (8009) Advanced 900 (estimated) 70%

Applications and results

The application period is usually around early March until late April for July's examination and around early August until late September for December's exam.

Results for the December test are announced the following February for examinees in Japan, and March for overseas candidates. Test results are sent to the examinees through the testing organization or centre to which they applied.[24] From 2012, with online registration, results are available online before they are mailed out (late August for the July test). All examinees receive a report indicating their scores by section. Those who pass also receive a Certificate of Proficiency.

YearLevelJLPT in JapanJLPT overseas
ApplicantsExamineesCertified (%)ApplicantsExamineesCertified (%)
2007[25] 1 kyū 47,76142,92314,338 (33.4%)135,616110,93728,550 (25.7%)
2 kyū 34,78231,80511,884 (37.4%)186,226152,19840,975 (26.9%)
3 kyū 16,80815,7108,664 (55.1%)143,252113,52653,806 (47.4%)
4 kyū 3,9083,3832,332 (68.9%)64,12753,47627,767 (51.9%)
2008[26] 1 kyū 52,99246,95318,454 (39.3%)138,131116,27138,988 (33.5%)
2 kyū 41,92438,04016,289 (42.8%)187,482157,14258,124 (37.0%)
3 kyū 22,01620,35113,304 (65.4%)147,435120,56969,605 (57.7%)
4 kyū 4,5243,9032,765 (70.8%)65,87755,82831,227 (55.9%)
2009-1[27] 1 kyū 29,27426,57811,738 (44.2%)103,34987,10428,230 (32.4%)
2 kyū 26,43724,7939,279 (37.4%)130,753110,26627,543 (25.0%)
2009-2[28] 1 kyū 46,64841,99812,293 (29.3%)137,708114,72526,427 (23.0%)
2 kyū 36,52833,80712,462 (36.9%)176,628147,32841,488 (28.2%)
3 kyū 17,70316,6759,360 (56.1%)131,733108,86751,903 (47.7%)
4 kyū 3,2122,9322,155 (73.5%)61,99553,04129,529 (55.7%)
2010-1[29] N1 26,22523,6949,651 (40.7%)73,86362,93819,402 (30.8%)
N2 24,73823,12613,768 (59.5%)87,88974,87432,530 (43.4%)
N3 6,9476,2803,051 (48.6%)42,22732,10012,574 (39.2%)
2010-2[30] N1 40,04136,81012,774 (34.7%)100,68987,76325,781 (29.4%)
N2 27,94726,02011,679 (44.9%)106,40291,99630,460 (33.1%)
N3 8,3637,6653,501 (44.9%)56,23645,90618,883 (41.1%)
N4 7,7647,3173,716 (50.8%)48,61341,48419,235 (46.4%)
N5 2,0651,8701,458 (78.0%)43,67638,12822,846 (59.9%)
2011-1[31] N1 24,71622,7826,546 (28.7%)89,74476,99120,519 (26.7%)
N2 19,20317,9579,057 (50.4%)92,01579,71630,216 (37.9%)
N3 5,6425,2112,511 (48.2%)36,84129,50713,230 (44.8%)
N4 3,6433,3581,431 (42.6%)19,01015,4535,802 (37.5%)
N5 716649464 (71.5%)12,34610,5106,108 (58.1%)
2011-2[32] N1 36,42633,46011,849 (35.4%)100,87388,45026,715 (30.2%)
N2 22,87521,2968,695 (40.8%)94,53882,94428,679 (34.6%)
N3 8,1497,5803,073 (40.5%)49,91741,65516,576 (39.8%)
N4 7,0086,5963,083 (46.7%)38,88833,40214,722 (44.1%)
N5 1,6031,4811,045 (70.6%)33,24529,15916,986 (58.3%)
2012-1[33] N1 26,05124,14211,074 (45.9%)78,90469,08223,789 (34.4%)
N2 20,04118,8439,683 (51.4%)78,55369,41829,191 (42.1%)
N3 7,3176,8783,232 (47.0%)38,65031,94214,391 (45.1%)
N4 5,4375,1162,388 (46.7%)22,43118,5908,489 (45.7%)
N5 1,004925679 (73.4%)16,36113,9118,129 (58.4%)
2012-2[34] N1 32,91730,2967,998 (26.4%)86,00475,25017,411 (23.1%)
N2 21,13919,6127,919 (40.4%)79,51369,79025,617 (36.7%)
N3 10,0859,4222,668 (28.3%)47,30139,76312,722 (32.0%)
N4 6,9616,5622,371 (36.1%)36,79931,62011,783 (37.3%)
N5 1,4161,307945 (72.3%)34,17829,70016,225 (54.6%)
2013-1[35] N1 27,09925,1178,503 (33.9%)74,67465,22520,139 (30.9%)
N2 20,95619,7129,117 (46.3%)73,72964,88529,725 (45.8%)
N3 9,9889,3373,623 (38.8%)39,87032,89513,063 (39.7%)
N4 5,6375,2972,485 (46.9%)23,74619,9419,823 (49.3%)
N5 1,000905696 (76.9%)18,72016,0169,957 (62.2%)
2013-2[36] N1 31,69128,92910,031 (34.7%)81,79471,49025,524 (35.7%)
N2 22,85921,2118,410 (39.6%)73,93564,98928,148 (43.3%)
N3 12,43611,5013,911 (34.0%)48,87541,12917,901 (43.5%)
N4 6,9636,4302,871 (44.7%)38,07832,75214,290 (43.6%)
N5 1,5191,392983 (70.6%)37,31331,92218,248 (57.2%)
2014-1[37] N1 26,27724,3959,513 (39.0%)73,78264,40921,108 (32.8%)
N2 22,22620,8559,359 (44.9%)73,82964,69929,313 (45.3%)
N3 14,84213,7494,362 (31.7%)42,74635,25115,535 (44.1%)
N4 6,6436,2083,028 (48.8%)27,27122,94410,657 (46.4%)
N5 1,3181,175885 (75.3%)23,15419,65810,726 (54.6%)
2014-2[38] N1 30,06127,3098,663 (31.7%)76,51666,61020,260 (30.4%)
N2 27,72525,5488,785 (34.4%)73,27463,49425,361 (39.9%)
N3 18,41516,7674,796 (28.6%)51,36542,64217,189 (40.3%)
N4 8,1237,5162,482 (33.0%)40,29234,26513,142 (38.4%)
N5 1,8621,6961,119 (66.0%)42,17235,49217,002 (47.9%)
2015-1[39] N1 27,21824,9718,958 (35.9%)70,45360,64220,625 (34.0%)
N2 28,78826,78810,819 (40.4%)74,93164,76428,538 (44.1%)
N3 22,38920,8676,398 (30.7%)46,79938,48916,081 (41.8%)
N4 9,8749,3323,556 (38.1%)32,59727,2419,383 (34.4%)
N5 1,7961,6341,190 (72.8%)29,20124,56912,940 (52.7%)
2015-2[40] N1 32,20029,3058,911 (30.4%)74,05964,35517,768 (27.6%)
N2 36,14733,37410,922 (32.7%)76,20265,80426,408 (40.1%)
N3 27,04724,6836,839 (27.7%)55,10345,58919,739 (43.3%)
N4 11,87410,9693,325 (30.3%)45,62338,56614,794 (38.4%)
N5 2,4082,1461,398 (65.1%)45,54338,43119,203 (50.0%)
2016-1[41] N1 30,21827,81010,340 (37.2%)69,14759,79019,396 (32.4%)
N2 39,13636,52514,037 (38.4%)79,20868,64232,324 (47.1%)
N3 36,55934,36811,447 (33.3%)50,85741,81619,531 (46.7%)
N4 13,43512,5474,272 (34.0%)36,63730,49811,960 (39.2%)
N5 2,1911,9771,282 (64.8%)32,28627,10613,671 (50.4%)
2016-2[42] N1 37,49234,06510,152 (29.8%)74,58464,86620,041 (30.9%)
N2 49,62045,68712,962 (28.4%)86,64974,94929,862 (39.8%)
N3 39,88136,53611,966 (32.8%)63,18752,40423,389 (44.6%)
N4 15,21913,9374,076 (29.2%)52,62644,39315,444 (34.8%)
N5 2,9892,6861,577 (58.7%)54,37345,20021,515 (47.6%)
2017-1[43] N1 34,98231,67711,100 (35.0%)74,03463,02120,861 (33.1%)
N2 50,78747,31618,145 (38.3%)94,52380,93338,216 (47.2%)
N3 47,82044,84713,296 (29.6%)62,49450,63522,560 (44.6%)
N4 15,88714,8095,084 (34.3%)43,99536,19314,135 (39.1%)
N5 2,7912,5271,629 (64.5%)39,09432,14817,180 (53.4%)
2017-2[44] N1 44,02939,61612,278 (31.0%)80,97369,32222,010 (31.8%)
N2 62,40457,37416,425 (28.6%)101,15186,14534,593 (40.2%)
N3 52,90148,47114,907 (30.8%)74,76160,85526,432 (43.4%)
N4 18,19016,7594,680 (27.9%)61,98651,64318,504 (35.8%)
N5 3,6793,2802,033 (62.0%)60,63049,80923,972 (48.1%)
2018-1[45] N1 40,71836,79112,488 (33.9%)80,89668,23522,494 (33.0%)
N2 58,76354,61917,994 (32.9%)105,17189,32037,326 (41.8%)
N3 61,87858,12617,547 (30.2%)71,95158,41726,691 (45.7%)
N4 18,21816,7375,126 (30.6%)51,35342,46814,412 (33.9%)
N5 3,2512,9031,836 (63.2%)51,99042,46320,768 (48.9%)
2018-2[46] N1 48,42243,58912,015 (27.6%)83,80871,41621,509 (30.1%)
N2 71,81666,20019,661 (29.7%)110,45794,09937,523 (39.9%)
N3 67,61062,62716,690 (26.6%)79,76164,90728,027 (43.2%)
N4 21,11419,4816,418 (32.9%)68,29657,00920,345 (35.7%)
N5 4,2903,8572,254 (58.4%)68,23755,81024,913 (44.6%)
2019-1[47] N1 48,07942,99712,660 (29.4%)87,91973,86321,575 (29.2%)
N2 69,84464,50321,885 (33.9%)118,68399,93137,275 (37.3%)
N3 72,95168,23124,513 (35.9%)84,79468,01929,153 (42.9%)
N4 25,06023,1157,452 (32.2%)69,92556,61618,613 (32.9%)
N5 4,5664,0852,520 (61.7%)62,28349,08822,797 (46.4%)
2019-2[48] N1 58,79952,14714,359 (27.5%)89,68975,68124,953 (33.0%)
N2 84,27877,41021,852 (28.2%)118,327100,63041,958 (41.7%)
N3 79,87673,35420,322 (27.7%)86,30770,54028,033 (39.7%)
N4 31,45228,8268,262 (28.7%)89,44374,67723,055 (30.9%)
N5 4,9744,4172,379 (53.9%)74,91860,40524,784 (41.0%)

Previous format (1984–2009)

Until 2009, the test had four levels.[4] JLPT certificates do not expire,[5] so results from the previous format remain valid.

All instructions on the test were written in Japanese, although their difficulty is adjusted to remain appropriate to each test level.[49] The subject matter covered at each level of the examination was based upon the Test Content Specification (出題基準, Shutsudai kijun), first published in 1994 and revised in 2004. This specification served as a reference for examiners to compile test questions, rather than as a study guide for candidates. It consisted of kanji lists, expression lists, vocabulary lists, and grammar lists for all four JLPT levels. However, about 20% of the kanji, vocabulary, and grammar in any one exam may have been drawn from outside the prescribed lists at the discretion of exam compilers.[50]

Test content summary[51]
Level Kanji Vocabulary Listening Time of Study (est.) Pass Mark
4 ~100 (103) ~800 (728) Basic 150 hrs (A Basic course level) 60%
3 ~300 (284) ~1,500 (1409) Intermediate 300 hrs (An Intermediate course level)
2 ~1000 (1023) ~6,000 (5035) Intermediate 600 hrs (An Intermediate course level)
1 ~2000 (1926) ~10,000 (8009) Advanced 900 hrs (An advanced course level) 70%

Numbers in parentheses indicate the exact number in the Test Content Specification.[50]

The independent source the Japanese Language Education Center publishes the following study hour comparison data:

JLPT Study Hour Comparison Data 1992-2010[52]
Level Students with kanji knowledge　

(e.g. speakers of Chinese)

 Other students

(no prior kanji knowledge)

4 200~300 hours 250~400 hours
3 375~475 hours 500~750 hours
2 1100~1500 hours 1400~2000 hours
1 1800~2300 hours 3100~4500 hours

Test sections

In its previous format, the JLPT was divided into three sections: "Characters and Vocabulary" (100 points), "Listening Comprehension" (100 points), and "Reading Comprehension and Grammar" (200 points).

The first section (文字･語彙, moji, goi) tests knowledge of vocabulary and various aspects of the Japanese writing system. This includes identifying the correct kanji characters for given situations, selecting the correct hiragana readings for given kanji, choosing the appropriate terms for given sentences, and choosing the appropriate usage of given words.

The second section (聴解, chōkai) comprises two sub-sections that test listening comprehension. The first involves choosing the picture which best represents the situation presented by a prerecorded conversation. The second is of a similar format but presents no visual clues.

Section three (読解･文法, dokkai, bunpō) uses authentic or semi-authentic reading passages of various lengths to test reading comprehension. Questions include prompts to fill in blank parts of the text and requests to paraphrase key points. Grammar questions request that examinees select the correct grammar structure to convey a given point or test conjugations and postpositional particle agreement.

Exam duration
Level Kanji and
vocabulary		 Listening
comprehension		 Reading
comprehension
and grammar		 Total duration
4 25 min 25 min 50 min 100 min
3 35 min 35 min 70 min 140 min
2 35 min 40 min 70 min 145 min
1 45 min 45 min 90 min 180 min

Comparison with new format

Two changes in levels of tests were made from the previous four-level format: firstly, a new level was inserted between the old level 3 and level 2, and secondly, the content of the top level exam (old level 1) was changed to test slightly more advanced skills, though the passing level was not changed,[53] possibly through equating of test scores. Vocabulary in particular is said to be taken from an increased pool of 18,000 words.

The addition of the new N3 was done to address the problem of the difficulty gap between level 3 and 2: in the past there had been requests for revisions to address the fact that examinees who had passed the Level 3 test often had trouble with passing the Level 2 test because of the large gap in level of skill needed to pass those two levels. There was also a desire to measure abilities more advanced than those targeted by the current Level 1 test, hence the top level exam was modified.[54]

The correspondence is as follows:

  • N1: slightly more advanced than the original level 1,[55] but the same passing level
  • N2: the same as the original level 2
  • N3: in between the original level 2 and level 3
  • N4: the same as the original level 3
  • N5: the same as the original level 4

The revised test continues to test the same content categories as the original, but the first and third sections of the test have been combined into a single section.[21] Sections on oral and writing skills were not introduced.[7] Further, a requirement to pass individual sections was added, rather than only achieving an overall score.

It has been argued that changes to the exam were connected to the introduction of new language policies instituted by the Ministry of Education regarding the education of minorities in Japan.[56]

gollark: Exciting news: minoteaur™ is to have its first client-side JS.
gollark: If they haven't heard of Brain[EXPUNGED], why are they even examining computer science‽
gollark: Brain[EXPUNGED].
gollark: Something something file descriptor‽
gollark: https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/426116061415342080/806533380765253647/image0.jpg?width=422&height=422

See also

References
  1. "Objectives and History". Japan Foundation. Retrieved June 20, 2011.
  2. "List of Overseas Test Sites, JLPT page". Japan Foundation. Retrieved January 14, 2012.
  3. "N1-N5: Summary of Linguistic Competence Required for Each Level". Japan Foundation. Retrieved November 26, 2012.
  4. "Comparison of with Old Tests - JLPT Japanese-Language Proficiency Test". Archived from the original on 29 April 2013. Retrieved 2 May 2015.
  5. "FAQ -JLPT Japanese-Language Proficiency Test". Retrieved 2 May 2015.
  6. "Introduction". The Japan Foundation. Retrieved 2009-05-01.
  7. "第2回 日本語能力試験改訂 中間報告" (PDF) (in Japanese). Japan Foundation. 2008-05-25. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 13, 2008. Retrieved May 13, 2008.
  8. "What is EJU?". Japan Student Services Organisation. Retrieved May 30, 2006.
  9. The 2005 Language Proficiency Test Level 1 and 2 Questions and Correct Answers, JEES & The Japan Foundation, Japan, 2006, pages 88 and 99. ISBN 4-89358-609-2
  10. "2009-2nd examination results, part 3" (PDF). JEES. Retrieved July 29, 2010.
  11. Hiragana Times, "Japanese-Language Proficiency Test", Volume #294, April 2011, p. 4.
  12. "Number of Applicants and Examinees by Test Site" (PDF). JEES. Retrieved 4 March 2020.
  13. "Point Evaluation Mechanism | Points-based Preferential Immigration Treatment for Highly-Skilled Foreign Professionals". www.immi-moj.go.jp. Retrieved 2020-02-27.
  14. "Advantages of JLPT - JLPT Japanese-Language Proficiency Test". Retrieved 2 May 2015.
  15. "平成24年度就学義務猶予免除者等の中学校卒業程度認定試験（中卒認定）受験案内". Retrieved 2 May 2015.
  16. "List of Local Host Institutions of JLPT". Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on 2010-02-14. Retrieved January 31, 2009.
  17. Chen, Ping and Nanette Gottlieb. Language Planning and Language Policy: East Asian Perspectives, Routledge, 2001, page 43.
  18. "Japanese Language Proficiency Test guidelines, 2006 (PDF), page 1" (PDF). JEES and The Japan Foundation. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 11, 2009. Retrieved February 18, 2009.
  19. The 2005 Language Proficiency Test Level 1 and 2 Questions and Correct Answers, page 122.
  20. "New Japanese-Language Proficiency Test FAQ". The Japan Foundation, JEES. Retrieved November 19, 2010.
  21. "Points for Revision". The Japan Foundation. Archived from the original on August 22, 2008. Retrieved February 21, 2009.
  22. "Composition of Test Sections and Items". The Japan Foundation. Retrieved March 16, 2011.
  23. "JLPT Study Hour Comparison Data 2010-2015". The Japan Language Education Center. Archived from the original on November 17, 2015. Retrieved November 4, 2015.
  24. "Japanese Language Proficiency Test guidelines, 2006 (PDF), page 3" (PDF). JEES and The Japan Foundation. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 11, 2009. Retrieved February 18, 2009.
  25. 2007年結果の概要,実施国・地域別応募者数・受験者数 Archived 2009-12-28 at the Wayback Machine JEES. Retrieved 5 April 2010.
  26. 2008年結果の概要,実施国・地域別応募者数・受験者数 Archived 2009-08-23 at the Wayback Machine JEES. Retrieved 5 April 2010.
  27. 2009年度1回日本語能力試験実施状況 JEES. Retrieved 5 March 2010.
  28. 2009年度2回日本語能力試験実施状況 JEES. Retrieved 5 March 2010.
  29. Data of the test in 2010 (July) JEES. Retrieved 27 November 2010.
  30. Data of the test in 2010 (December) JEES. Retrieved 12 February 2011.
  31. Data of the test in 2011 (July) JEES. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
  32. Data of the test in 2011 (December) JEES. Retrieved 29 December 2018
  33. Data of the test in 2012 (July) JEES. Retrieved 29 December 2018
  34. Data of the test in 2012 (December) JEES. Retrieved 29 August 2012
  35. Data of the test in 2013 (July) JEES. Retrieved 3 May 2015
  36. Data of the test in 2013 (December) JEES. Retrieved 3 May 2015
  37. Data of the test in 2014 (July) JEES. Retrieved 29 December 2018
  38. Data of the test in 2014 (December) JEES. Retrieved 27 June 2017
  39. Data of the test in 2015 (July) JEES. Retrieved 27 June 2017
  40. Data of the test in 2015 (December) JEES. Retrieved 27 June 2017
  41. Data of the test in 2016 (July) JEES. Retrieved 27 June 2017
  42. Data of the test in 2016 (December) JEES. Retrieved 29 December 2018
  43. Data of the test in 2017 (July) JEES. Retrieved 29 December 2018
  44. Data of the test in 2017 (December) JEES. Retrieved 29 December 2018
  45. Data of the test in 2018 (July) JEES. Retrieved 29 December 2018
  46. Data of the test in 2018 (December) JEES. Retrieved 6 April 2019
  47. Data of the test in 2019 (July) JEES. Retrieved 15 March 2020
  48. Data of the test in 2019 (December) JEES. Retrieved 17 April 2020
  49. Noda, Hiroshi and Mari Noda. Acts of Reading: Exploring Connections in Pedagogy of Japanese, University of Hawaii Press, 2003, page 219.
  50. Japanese Language Proficiency Test: Test Content Specifications (Revised Edition), The Japan Foundation and Association of International Education, Japan, 2004. ISBN 4-89358-281-X.
  51. "Guidelines for the Japanese-Language Proficiency Test in 2009 (December)" (PDF). Japan Foundation and Japan Educational Exchanges and Services. Retrieved March 17, 2011.
  52. "JLPT Study Hour Comparison Data 1992-2010". The Japan Language Education Center. Archived from the original on July 16, 2011. Retrieved January 25, 2011.
  53. "Revision of the Japanese-Language Proficiency Test: Second Progress Report, 2008 (PDF), pages 4-5" (PDF). Committee for Revision of the Japanese-Language Proficiency Test, JEES and The Japan Foundation. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 6, 2009. Retrieved February 21, 2009.
  54. "Points for Revision". The Japan Foundation. Archived from the original on 2008-08-22. Retrieved 2009-02-21.
  55. "Get your motor running for the revamped JLPT". Kanji Clinic. Archived from the original on July 3, 2017. Retrieved July 14, 2017.
  56. Roxanne Lizelle Niveri; Sol Rojas-Lizana (24 December 2019). "'Changes' to the new Japanese-Language Proficiency Test: Newly emerged language policies for non-Japanese and Japanese citizens". Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies. 19 (3). Retrieved 26 December 2019.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.