Anti-Indian sentiment

Anti-Indian sentiment or Indophobia refers to negative feelings and hatred towards India, Indians, and Indian culture.[1] Indophobia is formally defined in the context of anti-Indian prejudice in East Africa as "a tendency to react negatively towards people of Indian extraction against aspects of Indian culture and normative habits".[2] Its opposite is Indomania.

For sentiment against Native Americans, see Contemporary Native American issues in the United States.

Part of a series on
Discrimination
Specific forms
 

Historic anti-Indian sentiment

By the late 19th century, sinophobia had already emerged in North America over Chinese immigration and the cheap labor which it supplied, mostly for railroad construction in California and elsewhere on the West Coast.[3] In the common jargon of the day, ordinary workers, newspapers and politicians opposed this "Yellow Peril". The common cause of eradicating Asians from the workforce gave rise to the Asiatic Exclusion League. As the Indian community of mostly Punjabi Sikhs settled in California, the xenophobia expanded to encompass immigrants from British India.[4][5][6]

Colonial period

Indologists

The relationship between "Indomania" and "Indophobia" in colonial era British Indology was discussed by American Indologist Thomas Trautmann (1997) who found that Indomania had become a norm in early 19th century Britain as the result of a conscious agenda of Evangelicalism and utilitarianism, especially by Charles Grant and James Mill.[7] Historians noted that during the British Empire, "evangelical influence drove British policy down a path that tended to minimize and denigrate the accomplishments of Indian civilization and to position itself as the negation of the earlier British Indomania that was nourished by belief in Indian wisdom."[8]

In Grant's highly influential "Observations on the ...Asiatic subjects of Great Britain" (1796),[9] he criticized the Orientalists for being too respectful to Indian culture and religion. His work tried to determine the Hindus' "true place in the moral scale" and he alleged that the Hindus are "a people exceedingly depraved". Grant believed that Great Britain's duty was to civilise and Christianize the natives.

Lord Macaulay, serving on the Supreme Council of India between 1834 and 1838, was instrumental in creating the foundations of bilingual colonial India. He convinced the Governor-General to adopt English as the medium of instruction in higher education from the sixth year of schooling onwards, rather than Sanskrit or Arabic. He claimed: "I have never found one among them who could deny that a single shelf of a good European library was worth the whole native literature of India and Arabia."[10] He wrote that Arabic and Sanskrit works on medicine contain "medical doctrines which would disgrace an English Farrier – Astronomy, which would move laughter in girls at an English boarding school – History, abounding with kings thirty feet high reigns thirty thousand years long – and Geography made up of seas of treacle and seas of butter".[11]

One of the most influential historians of India during the British Empire, James Mill was criticised for prejudice against Hindus.[12] Horace Hayman Wilson wrote that the tendency of Mill's work was "evil".[13] Mill claimed that both Indians and Chinese people are cowardly, unfeeling and mendacious. Both Mill and Grant attacked Orientalist scholarship that was too respectful of Indian culture: "It was unfortunate that a mind so pure, so warm in the pursuit of truth so devoted to oriental learning, as that of Sir William Jones, should have adopted the hypothesis of a high state of civilization in the principal countries of Asia."[14]

Dadabhai Naoroji spoke against such anti-India sentiment.[15]

Colonialists

Stereotypes of Indians intensified during and after the Indian Rebellion of 1857, known as India's First War of Independence to the Indians and as the Sepoy Mutiny to the British, when Indian sepoys rebelled against the British East India Company's rule in India. Allegations of war rape were used as propaganda by British colonialists in order to justify the colonization of India. While incidents of rape committed by Indian rebels against British women and girls were generally uncommon, this was exaggerated by the British media to justify continued British intervention in the Indian subcontinent.[16]

At the time, British newspapers had printed various apparently eyewitness accounts of British women and girls being raped by Indian rebels, but cited little physical evidence. It was later found that some were fictions created to paint the native people as savages who needed to be civilized, a mission sometimes known as "The White Man's Burden". One such account published by The Times, regarding an incident where 48 British girls as young as 10–14 had been raped by Indian rebels in Delhi, was criticized as propaganda by Karl Marx, who pointed out that the story was written by a clergyman in Bangalore, far from the events.[17] A wave of anti-Indian vandalism accompanied the rebellion. When Delhi fell to the British, the city was ransacked, the palaces looted and the mosques desecrated in what has been called "a deliberate act of unnecessary vandalism".[18]

Despite the questionable authenticity of colonial accounts regarding the rebellion, the stereotype of the Indian "dark-skinned rapist" occurred frequently in English literature of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The idea of protecting British "female chastity" from the "lustful Indian male" had a significant influence on the British Raj's policies outlawing miscegenation between the British and the Indians. While some restrictive policies were imposed on British females to "protect" them from miscegenation, most were directed against Indians.[19][20] For example, the 1883 Ilbert Bill, which would have granted Indian judges the right to judge British offenders, was opposed by many British colonialists on the grounds that Indian judges could not be trusted in cases alleging the rape of British females.[21]

Post-independence

Contemporary Indophobia has risen in the western world, particularly the United States, on account of the rise of the Indian American community and the increase in offshoring of white-collar jobs to India by American multinational corporations.[22] Indophobia in the west manifests itself through intimidation and harassment, such as the case of the Dotbusters, a hate group targeting South Asians.

Regional Anti-Indian sentiment

Asia

South Asia
Pakistan

According to Christophe Jaffrelot and Jean-Luc Racine, Pakistan's nationalism is primarily anti-Indian, even though India was part of the Indus Valley civilization over many thousands of years. "This is the essence of the country's identity."[23] However Anti-Indian and anti-Hindu sentiments have waxed and waned in the country since its independence.[24][25] According to Tufts University professor Seyyed Vali Reza Nasr, anti-India sentiment in Pakistan increased with the ascendancy of the Islamist Jamaat-e-Islami under Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi.[25]

Historic

British diplomacy and supremacy in arms displaced Muslim power which religious and cultural responses from the Muslim populace were unable to stop.[26] Some Indian Muslims feared the Hindu majority that would gain political ascendance after independence. This view was bolstered by religious riots in British India such as the 1927 Nagpur riots.[27] The Two-Nation Theory was enunciated by Allama Iqbal,[28][29] which was supported by the All India Muslim League and eventually culminated in the Independence of India and of Pakistan in 1947.[30]

Independence was accompanied by acts of genocide and hundreds of thousands of deaths on both sides of the border leading to lasting memories among the surviving refugee populations.[31] In Pakistan, this contributed to Indophobia. In an interview with Indian news channel CNN-IBN Pakistani cricketer and politician Imran Khan said "I grew up hating India because I grew up in Lahore and there were massacres of 1947, so much bloodshed and anger. But as I started touring India, I got such love and friendship there that all this disappeared."[32]

The Two-Nation Theory predicates that the Indian Subcontinent at the time of Partition was not a nation and in its extreme interpretation postulates that the Indian Hindus and Indian Muslims constituted nations which cannot co-exist "in a harmonious relationship".[33][34][35][36]

According to Husain Haqqani after partition Pakistan faced multiple challenges to its survival. At the time Pakistan's secular leaders decided to use Islam as a rallying cry against perceived threats from predominantly Hindu India. Unsure of Pakistan's future they deliberately promoted anti-India sentiment with "Islamic Pakistan" resisting a "Hindu India".[37]

According to Nasr, Anti-Indian sentiments, coupled with anti-Hindu prejudices have existed in Pakistan since its formation.[25] Indophobia in Pakistan increased with the ascendancy of the Jamaat-e-Islami under Maududi.[25][38]

Commenting on Indophobia in Pakistan in 2009 former United States Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice termed the Pakistan-India relationship as shadowed by Indophobia.[39]

In his article "The future of Pakistan" published by Brookings Institution American South Asia expert Stephen P. Cohen describes the Pakistan-India relationship as a neverending spiral of sentiments against each other.[40]

In Pakistani textbooks
Main article: Pakistani textbooks controversy

According to Sustainable Development Policy Institute since the 1970s Pakistani school textbooks have systematically inculcated hatred towards India and Hindus.[41][42] According to this report, "Associated with the insistence on the Ideology of Pakistan has been an essential component of hate against India and the Hindus. For the upholders of the Ideology of Pakistan, the existence of Pakistan is defined only in relation to Hindus hence the Hindus have to be painted as negatively as possible".[41] A 2005 report by the National Commission for Justice and Peace, a nonprofit organization in Pakistan, found that Pakistan studies textbooks in Pakistan have been used to articulate the hatred that Pakistani policy-makers have attempted to inculcate towards the Hindus. "Vituperative animosities legitimize military and autocratic rule, nurturing a siege mentality. Pakistan Studies textbooks are an active site to represent India as a hostile neighbor", the report stated. "The story of Pakistan's past is intentionally written to be distinct from often in direct contrast with, interpretations of history found in India. From the government-issued textbooks, students are taught that Hindus are backward and superstitious.' Further the report stated 'Textbooks reflect intentional obfuscation. Today's students, citizens of Pakistan and its future leaders are the victims of these blatant lies."[43]

Indo-Pakistani military conflicts

In 1971 rising political discontent in East Pakistan, on the other side of India from West Pakistan, led to calls to secede from Pakistan, which were brutally suppressed by Pakistan Army leading to the Bangladesh Liberation War. India intervened, triggering the brief Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 that culminated in Pakistan's defeat and the secession of East Pakistan which then became Bangladesh. According to Ardeshir Cowasjee in West Pakistan the region's political and military leadership whipped up anti-Indian sentiment with the slogan "crush India", in an attempt to convince the people that the only issue in East Pakistan was India's support of a secessionist movement.[44]

Writing for Middle East Research and Information Project the Pakistani nuclear scientist Pervez Hoodbhoy stated that anti-Indian sentiment is instilled in Pakistani soldiers early in their training at Cadet College Hasan Abdal and Cadet College Petaro. He also claimed that in order to prosper, Pakistan needed to overcome its hatred of India.[45]

Bangladesh

Even though India played a key role in the independence of Bangladesh, providing arms and training to the nationalists, the relationship began to sour within a few years. After the 1975 military coup, 'Bangladeshi nationalism' was formulated as a new identity, which portrayed India as an adversary. Over the next 30 years, the situation worsened with the addition of further issues of difference between the two nations. There is a general perception of an Indian regional hegemony among the Bangladeshis. Such perceptions were used by the military regimes and the BNP to cultivate an atmosphere of Indophobia and exploit it for electoral gains.[46]

Although a sizeable Hindu minority remained in Bangladesh following the 1947 Partition of India, growing anti-Hinduism caused steady migration into India. The phobia that had grown from anti-Hinduism into Indophobia forms part of ethnic Bengali Nationalism,[47] which continues to mark Bangladeshi perceptions of Indians. Political disputes such as the Farakka Barrage, Indo-Bangladesh enclaves and Indo-Bangladeshi barrier created rifts between the two countries.[48] Persecution of Hindus in Bangladesh by the rising tide of militant Islamists and cross-border infiltration into India by illegal Bangladeshi immigrants created anti-Bangladeshi sentiment in India. Indophobia coupled with anti-Hinduism, led to accusations of dual loyalty among Bangladeshi Hindus by right-wing Bangladeshis often affiliated with the Al-Badr-esque Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh.[49][50][51]

Nepal
Anti-Indian protests in USA by Nepalese community

Despite centuries long relation between the two nations, Nepal has clashed with India over different issues such as territorial disputes, dispute over the birthplace of Gautama Buddha, intervention on internal issues and for the support of Nepali ethnic unrest directly responsible for the 2015 Nepal blockade. The BackoffIndia movement was used as Nepalese around the world accused the Indians of interfering in the country's internal matters increasing the hatred of the Indians.[52]

Sri Lanka

Anti-Indian prejudice may be caused by the island nation's bad experience with Invasions by Tamil Indian Dynasties (such as the Chola dynasty), their ethnic tensions with Sri Lanka's Tamil minority, who are accused of loyalty to India,[53] India's support and training of the LTTE[54] as well as massacres against Tamil Sri Lankan civilians committed by the Indian army denied by the Indians, such as the Jaffna hospital massacre.[55]

During the defence against the invading Tamil Chola dynasty, the Sri Lankans killed about 1.03 million Tamil Indians in Sri Lanka as a retaliation for invading their country.[56]

Despite India's alliance with the Sri Lankan government during the Sri Lankan Civil War, anti-Indian hatreds and prejudices are fairly common among the ethnic Sinhalese, escalated by Buddhist Nationalism and militancy. Attitudes towards Tamils are associated with Indophobia and the Tamils were suspected of spying for the Indians. Indian traders and businessmen, patronized by the Tamil minority, have been shunned and attacked by the Sinhalese.[53]

During the 1950s, discriminatory measures taken by the Sinhala regime targeted Indian traders (typically from the Indian states of Tamil Nadu and Kerala), forcing the traders out of Sri Lanka. Following this, trade with India was deliberately scuttled, as was the sale of Indian magazines.[53]

The Indophobia of that era led the Sinhala government to go after the so-called Tamils of 'recent' Indian origin. These immigrant plantation workers were imported by the British more than a hundred years earlier and had already been stripped of citizenship by earlier legislation—the first Legislative Act of the newly independent country in 1948. Since then, these Tamils lived as 'stateless' persons and many returned to India.[53][57]

In 1981, riots were carried out by Sinhalese mobs against predominantly Indian Tamils in Ratnapura, Kahawatte and Balangoda areas. Shops were looted and set on fire and many women and girls were raped by marauding mobs. During the Black July riots, 4,000 Indian and Sri Lankan Tamils were killed by Sinhalese rioters, and over 40,000 Tamil Indians were killed by the Sri Lankan Army and LTTE forces in the Mullivaikkal massacre.

Southeast Asia
Myanmar

Anti-Indian sentiment began to rise in Burma after the First World War ended[58] for a number of reasons. The country's ethnic Indian population was rapidly growing in Myanmar (almost half of Yangon's population was Indian by the Second World War[59]). The Indians played a prominent role in the British administration and as a result, they began to be targeted for persecution by Burmese nationalists. Racial animosity towards Indians because of their skin-color and appearance also played a role.[60] Meanwhile, the price of rice plummeted during the economic depression of the 1930s and the Chettiar from South India, who were prominent moneylenders in the rice belt, began to foreclose on land held by native Burmese.[60][61]

In May 1930, a British-owned stevedore firm which operated at the port of Rangoon employed Burmese workers in an attempt to break a strike that was being organized by its Indian workers. When, on 26 May, the strike ended and the Indians returned to work, clashes soon broke out between the returning Indian workers and the Burmese workers who had replaced them. The clashes soon escalated into large-scale anti-Indian riots in the city, killing more than two hundred Indians and their dead bodies were flung into the river. Authorities ordered the police to fire upon any assembly of five or more who refused to lay down their arms, under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Within two days the riot spread throughout the country to locations such as Maymyo.[62]

After Burma achieved Independence, Burmese law treated a large percentage of the Indian community as "resident aliens". Though many had long ties to Burma or were born there, they were not considered citizens under the 1982 Burma citizenship law which restricted citizenship for groups immigrating before 1823.[63]

After seizing power through a military coup in 1962, General Ne Win ordered a large-scale expulsion of Indians. Although many Indians had been living in Burma for generations and had integrated into Burmese society, they became a target for discrimination and oppression by the junta. This, along with a wholesale nationalization of private ventures in 1964, led to the emigration of over 300,000 ethnic Indians from Burma.[61] Indian-owned businesses were nationalized and their owners were given 175 kyat for their trip to India. This caused a significant deterioration in Indian-Burmese relations and the Indian government arranged ferries and aircraft to lift Burmese of Indian ethnicities out of Burma.[64]

Malaysia

On 28 June 1969, anti-Indian riots broke out in Sentul where Malays attacked and killed 15 Indians.[65]

In March 2001, a 9-day period of communal violence known as the 2001 Kampung Medan riots occurred between Indians and Malays cost the deaths of 6 people and injuring many more people. The severity of injuries range from head injuries to severed limbs. The riots no doubt caused anti-Indian feelings among Malays residing in Selangor and Klang Valley.

The novel Interlok caused enormous controversial backlash for allegedly being anti-Indian as the book includes racist derogatory terms used to refer to the Indians such as "Pariah" and "black people". The novel also includes the usage of the term kasta pariah ("pariah caste"), which often refers to persons from the lowest caste in the Indian caste system.[66]

East Asia

China

Anti-Indian protests were held through held through the streets of Beijing amidst the Aksai Chin land disputes. However contemporary relationship appear to be better today with the signing of new trade agreements.

Multiple brawls broke out in June 2020, escalating to dozens of deaths on both sides. Both countries attribute responsibility to the other one. Indian mainstream response was to boycott Chinese products but no official action of this sort was taken by the Indian government, however, some business deals where China has invested in India got put on hold.

Africa

Kenya

Following the 1982 Kenyan coup d'état attempt to remove President Moi, many Indian shops and businesses in Nairobi were attacked and pillaged whilst a number of Indian women were said to have been raped by the rioters.[67]

South Africa

The first anti-Indian commotion that took place in South Africa was the Durban riots in 1949 that took place in the South Africa's largest city Durban, where angry Black Zulus attacked and killed 142 ethnic Indians, destroyed and looted Indian property while Indian women and children were raped and then bludgeoned to death.[68] Many local Whites who were present openly supported the Zulus in their anti-Indian killings and even participated in the lootings.

Another anti-Indian riot took place again in Durban in 1985.[69]

The great leader Mahatma Gandhi experienced anti-Indian racism when he was in South Africa, he was beaten up by a driver for travelling in first class coach.[70] The Indians were not allowed to walk on public footpaths in South Africa and Gandhi was kicked by a police officer out of the footpath onto the street without warning.[71]

In 2015, Phumlani Mfeka, a KwaZulu-Natal businessman and the spokesman for the radical Mazibuye African Forum tweeted "A good Indian is a dead Indian".[72][73][74] He published a letter in the city press claiming that South Africans of Indian origin have no right to citizenship and property in South Africa. Mfeka also claimed there is a "ticking time bomb of a deadly confrontation" between Africans and Indians in KwaZulu-Natal. The South African court barred him from making anti-Indian remarks in Nov 2015.[75]

In 2017, political leader Julius Malema stated during a rally in KwaZulu-Natal "They are ill-treating our people. They are worse than Afrikaners were. This is not an anti-Indian statement, it's the truth. Indians who own shops don't pay our people, but they give them food parcels," and accused local politicians of being in the pockets of Indian businesspeople.[76] Malema also said that the success of Indian businesses in the province was due to their strategies of exploitation and monopolisation of the economy.[77] Malema also referred to Indians in 2011 as 'coolies' (which is considered a strongly offensive pejorative term in contemporary South Africa).[78]

Uganda

The most famous case of Indophobia is the ethnic cleansing of Indians and other South Asians (sometimes simply called "Asian") in Uganda by Idi Amin.[79] (See Expulsion of Asians from Uganda.)

According to H.H. Patel, many Indians in East Africa and Uganda were tailors and bankers, leading to stereotyping.

Indophobia in Uganda also existed under Milton Obote, before Amin's rise. The 1968 Committee on "Africanisation in Commerce and Industry" in Uganda made far-reaching Indophobic proposals.

A system of work permits and trade licenses was introduced in 1969 to Indians' economic and professional activities. Indians were segregated and discriminated against in all walks of life. After Amin came to power, he exploited these divisions to spread propaganda against Indians.

Indians were stereotyped as "only traders" and thereby "inbred" to their profession. Indians were attacked as "dukawallas" (an occupational term that degenerated into an anti-Indian slur during Amin's time). They were stereotyped as "greedy, conniving", without racial identity or loyalty but "always cheating, conspiring and plotting" to subvert Uganda.

Amin used this to justify a campaign of "de-Indianisation", eventually resulting in the expulsion and ethnic cleansing of Uganda's Indian minority.[79] Some 80,000 were expelled, leading about 25,000 to settle in the United Kingdom.[80]

Europe

Germany

India suffers from a severe image deficit in Germany.[81][82]

In August 2007, a mob of over 50 persons attacked 8 Indians in Mügeln.[83][84][85][86]

A 2014 BBC World Service Poll showed that 68% of Germans view India's influence negatively.[87]

United Kingdom

The Indian Rebellion of 1857 triggered mass anti-Indian hysteria amongst the British public as news of atrocities committed by Indian rebels against British civilians became increasingly widely known throughout Britain, resulting in large scale massacres against the Indians by British troops. The British troops killed about 150,000 Indians in Oudh alone, most of them civilians.[88] Places such as Delhi, Allahabad, Kanpur and Lucknow were all met with general massacre after they were recaptured by British forces.[88] One young officer was apparently recorded as saying "the orders were to shoot every soul... it was literally murder."

Former UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill also expressed his hatred and disgust of the Indians frequently throughout his political career. During the Bengal famine of 1943, when Churchill was confronted by some British officials to direct food supplies to save the starving Indians, Churchill replied by stating that the famine was merely culling the "beastly people with a beastly religion" and that it was the result and fault of the Indians for "breeding like rabbits" and joked "Why hasn't Gandhi died yet?".[89]

Americas

Canada

Anti-Indian sentiment among the European Canadian population increased as the numbers of South Asian Canadians increased.[90]

Caribbeans

There is occasional anti-Indian discrimination amongst the locals of the Caribbean islands especially Trinidad and Tobago.[91]

Guyana

Anti-Indian sentiments of Guyana sometimes becomes violent. Anti-Indian riots of Guyana saw blacks burn businesses belonging to the Indians, hundreds of Africans and Indians lost their lives rioting.[92][93][94]

United States

Immigration from India to the United States became more frequent between 1907-20 because of Canada's Immigration Act[95] in 1910 which restricted the number of Indians coming into the country. California was where most Indians migrated to and Indian immigrants had a negative stigma around them.[96]

Hatred of the Indians amongst Americans led to the 1907 Anti-Indian riots. In the late-1980s in New Jersey, an anti-Indian hategroup gang calling themselves the "Dotbusters" targeted, threatened and viciously beat Indians until they were in a coma and died or suffered brain damage.[97][98]

Vamsee Juluri, author and Professor of Media Studies at the University of San Francisco, identifies Indophobia in certain sections of the US media as part of a racist postcolonial/neocolonial discourse used to attack and defame India and encourage racial prejudice against Indian Americans, particularly in light of India's recent economic progress, which some "old-school" colonialists find to be incompatible with their Clash of Civilizations world view. Juluri identified numerous instances of bias and prejudice against Indians in US media, such as The New York Times and Foreign Policy[99] and attempts to erase and disparage the history of India in American school textbooks misrepresent the history of India during the California textbook controversy over Hindu history with the final verdict to retain the term "India" in Californian textbooks and to remove the disparaging contents from textbooks.

Surinam

Oceania

Australia
Further information: Violence against Indians in Australia controversy

In May and June 2009, racially motivated attacks against Indian international students and a perceived poor police response sparked protests. Rallies were held in both Melbourne and Sydney. Impromptu street protests were held in Harris Park, a suburb of western Sydney with a large Indian population. Representatives of the Indian government met with the Australian government to express concern and request that Indians be protected. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd expressed regret and called for the attackers to be brought to justice. The United Nations termed these attacks "disturbing" and the human rights commissioner Navi Pillay, herself a member of the Indian diaspora, asked Australia to investigate the matters further.[100]

Some Facebook groups were set up with Indophobic leanings.[101] The Rudd Government set up a task force to address a proposal to make sending a text message encouraging commission of a racial attack a federal offence. The group was headed by national security adviser Duncan Lewis. The proposed amendment would strengthen police powers to respond to attacks against Indian students.[102] Internet-based racist commentary was able to continue because of protection afforded by privacy laws. The current system allows the commission to investigate complaints of racial vilification and then attempt to resolve complaints through conciliation with ISPs and site operators.[103]

Pacific Islands

Fiji

Anti-Indian riots broke out throughout Fiji amidst an attempted coup. Protesters attacked Indian shops.[104]

Media

BBC

In 2008, the BBC was criticised for referring to those who carried out the November 2008 Mumbai attacks as "gunmen".[105] Journalist M. J. Akbar chose to boycott the BBC when he spoke of the 2008 Mumbai attacks.[106] British parliamentarian Stephen Pound referred to the BBCs alleged whitewashing of the attacks as "the worst sort of mealy mouthed posturing. It is desperation to avoid causing offence which ultimately causes more offence to everyone."[107]

Writing for the 2008 edition of the peer-reviewed Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, Alasdair Pinkerton analysed BBC Indian coverage from independence through 2008. Pinkerton suggested a tumultuous history involving allegations of Indophobic bias, particularly during the cold war, and concludes that BBC coverage of South Asian geopolitics and economics shows pervasive Indophobic bias.[108]

In the journal of the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, media analyst Ajai K. Rai strongly criticised the BBC for Indophobic bias. He found a lack of depth and fairness in BBC reporting on conflict zones in South Asia and that the BBC had, on at least one occasion, fabricated photographs while reporting on the Kashmir conflict to make India look bad. He claimed that the network made false allegations that the Indian Army stormed a sacred Muslim shrine, the tomb of Hazrat Sheikh Noor-u-din Noorani in Charari Sharief, and only retracted the claim after strong criticism.[109]

English journalist Christopher Booker has also criticized the BBC for its coverage of India-related matters. He concludes that the BBC's efforts to reinforce Stereotypes of South Asians has been directly responsible for damaging the image of India, and encouraging racist incidents against Indians, such as the Leipzig University internship controversy.[110]

New York Times

The newspaper's India coverage has been heavily criticized by scholars such as Sumit Ganguly, a professor of political science at Indiana University and member of the Council on Foreign Relations as well the London-based Institute of Strategic Studies. In a 2009 Forbes article, Ganguly faults the New York Times editorial board for its "hectoring" and "patronizing" tone towards India. He finds anti-India bias in coverage of the Kashmir Conflict, the Hyde Act and other India-related matters.[111]

In 2010, the Huffington Post charged that The New York Times is Indophobic and promotes neocolonialism with its slanted and negative coverage.[112] United States lawmaker Kumar P. Barve described a recent editorial on India as full of "blatant and unprofessional factual errors or omissions" having a "haughty, condescending, arrogant and patronizing" tone.[113]

In September 2014, the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) successfully placed a spacecraft into orbit around the planet Mars, thereby completing the Mars Orbiter Mission. CNN reported this as a "groundbreaking Mars mission", making India the first nation to arrive on its first attempt and the first Asian country to reach Mars.[114] A few days later, The New York Times published a cartoon on this event, showing a turban-wearing man with a cow knocking at the door of an "elite space club".[115] The Huffington Post said that the cartoon was in "poor taste" and "the racial, national and classist stereotyping is apparent".[116] The New York Times subsequently published an apology saying that a "large number of readers have complained" about the cartoon and that they "apologize to readers who were offended".[117]

In June 2016, the New York Times published an editorial opposing India's entry into the Nuclear Supplier's Group (NSG).[118] During this time the US administration led by President Barack Obama was actively supporting India's membership.[119] The paper said the membership was "not merited" and that India had "fallen far short" in assuming responsibilities of a nuclear nation. This view was criticized by several western and Indian experts on nuclear issues. Ramesh Thakur, Director of the Centre for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament at the Australian National University, said The New York Times is "frequently chauvinistic" and that the editorial "reflects a deliberate bias".[120] Alyssa Ayres, a senior fellow for South Asia at the Council on Foreign Relations, rebutted the editorial, saying "the small community of India-watchers in Washington read these words in disbelief" and the paper "should ground its arguments in an appraisal of the complete facts".[121]

In November 2017, the New York Times published an article by Asgar Qadri attacking the Indian Sari as a "conspiracy by Hindu Nationalists".[122] The article was widely lambasted on social media for associating a common Indian dress with religious prejudice and communalism.[123] In addition, the article was heavily criticized by several Indian journalists, such as Barkha Dutt,[124] who called it "daft commentary" and a "gross misrepresentation of what the sari means to us", and the notion that the sari is exclusively a Hindu dress as "utter nonsense". Others criticized the New York Times for promoting colonial racist stereotypes, and pointed out that the sari is also popular in Muslim-majority countries like Bangladesh.[125][126]

Pakistani media

Pakistani media commentators such as Zaid Hamid were accused by other Pakistanis of promoting Indophobia. In an editorial published in Daily Times Tayyab Shah accused him of acting at the behest of the Pakistani security establishment and condemned his views.[127] Along with Lashkar-e-Taiba he is one of the main proponents in present-day Pakistan of Ghazwatul Hind, a battle where Muslims will conquer India and establish Sharia rule according to a Hadith.[128]

Talking to reporters after inaugurating an exhibition in Lahore, Majid Nizami, the chief editor of Nawa-i-Waqt, stated "freedom is the greatest blessing of the Almighty, Who may save us from dominance of Hindus, as our sworn enemy India is bent upon destroying Pakistan. However, if it did not refrain from committing aggression against us, then Pakistan is destined to defeat India because our horses in the form of atomic bombs and missiles are far better than Indian 'donkeys'."[129]

Some of the anti-India propaganda is claimed to be driven by the Pakistani military.[130] In December 2010 many Pakistani newspapers published reports based on United States diplomatic cables leaks which portrayed India in a negative light.[131] The Guardian reported that none of the information reported by Pakistani media could be verified in its database of leaked cables.[132] Thereafter several newspapers apologized.[133] The fake cables were believed to have been planted by Inter-Services Intelligence.[131]

Slumdog Millionaire
Main articles: Reactions from India and the Indian diaspora to Slumdog Millionaire and Controversial issues surrounding Slumdog Millionaire

The Indo-British film Slumdog Millionaire was the subject of many controversies[134][135][136] in terms of its title, its depiction of Indian slums and its language use. The film's title was consistently challenged for having the word "dog" in it.[137] The protest took place in Patna where it was written on a signboard "I Am Not a Dog".[138] Activists stated that slum dwellers would continue to protest until the film's director deleted the word "dog" from the title.[139]

Co-director Loveleen Tandan was too criticized by producer Christian Colson. Colson defined her partnership with Boyle a mismatch. Colson noted that the title of "co-director (India)" given to Tandan was "strange but deserved" and was developed over "a Coca Cola and a cup of tea" in order to identify her as "one of our key cultural bridges."[140] During the 2009 Oscar awards ceremony, Tandan was ignored and all credit for the film was taken by Boyle. Some filmmakers and actors from Bollywood were also critical of Slumdog Millionaire including Aamir Khan,[141][142] Priyadarshan[143] and Music Director Aadesh Shrivastava.[144]

gollark: It's waaaay more elegant than the node.js accursion.
gollark: Yep!
gollark: ... is this timestamp *in* milliseconds?
gollark: I actually don't understand how my implementation could possibly contain any flaws.
gollark: That seems valid, very smart person.

See also

References
  1. "What does 'anti-Indian' mean?". sunday-guardian.com.
  2. Ali Mazrui, "The De-Indianisation of Uganda: Does it require an Educational Revolution?" paper delivered to the East African Universities Social Science Council Conference, 19–23 December 1973, Nairobi, Kenya, p.3.
  3. Matthew Annis. "Chinese railroad labourers in North America during the mid-late nineteenth century" (PDF). Matthew Annis. Retrieved 27 May 2012.
  4. Chan Sucheng, Asian Americans: An Interpretive History, Twayne 1991
  5. "Shut the gate to the Hindoo invasion", San Francisco examiner, 6 June 1910
  6. Alicia J. Campi (1 December 2005). "Closed Borders and Mass Deportations: The Lessons of the Barred Zone Act" (Scribd file). Immigration Policy Center. Retrieved 27 May 2012.
  7. Thomas R. Trautmann (1997). Aryans and British India.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Aryans and British India at Google Books
  8. (Trautmann 1997, p. 113)
  9. Grant, Charles. (1796) Observations on the state of society among the Asiatic subjects of Great Britain, particularly with respect to morals; and on the means of improving it, written chiefly in the year 1792.
  10. Thomas Babington Macaulay (July 1998). "Modern History Sourcebook: Thomas Babington Macaulay (1800-1859): On Empire and Education". Internet Modern History Sourcebook. Paul Halsall. Retrieved 27 May 2012.
  11. Macaulay, Thomas Babington, 1835:242-243, Minute on Indian education.
  12. (Trautmann 1997, p. 117)
  13. H.H. Wilson 1858 in James Mill 1858, The history of British India, Preface of the editor
  14. Mill, James – 1858, 2:109, The history of British India.
  15. "Essays, speeches, addresses and writings" by Dadabhai Naoroji
  16. Beckman, Karen Redrobe (2003). Vanishing Women: Magic, Film Feminism. Duke University Press. pp. 31–3. ISBN 0-8223-3074-1.
  17. Beckman, Karen Redrobe (2003). Vanishing Women: Magic, Film Feminism. Duke University Press. pp. 33–4. ISBN 0-8223-3074-1.
  18. Keay, John, India Discovered, The Recovery of a Lost Civilization, HarperCollins, London, 1981, ISBN 0-00-712300-0
  19. Kent, Eliza F. (2004). Converting Women. Oxford University PressUS. pp. 85–6. ISBN 0-19-516507-1.
  20. Kaul, Suvir (1996). "Review Essay: Colonial Figures and Postcolonial Reading". Diacritics. 26 (1): 74–89 [83–9]. doi:10.1353/dia.1996.0005.
  21. Carter, Sarah (1997). Capturing Women: The Manipulation of Cultural Imagery in Canada's Prairie West. McGill-Queen's University Press. p. 17. ISBN 0-7735-1656-5.
  22. Indophobia: Facts versus Fiction, Arvind Panagariya, Columbia University archives of The Economic Times
  23. Jaffrelot, Christophe, ed. (2002). Pakistan: Nationalism without a Nation. London: Zed Books. p. 38. ISBN 1842771175.
  24. Arsia Jawaid (21 October 2011). "Pakistan's non-'anti-India' generation". The Express Tribune.
  25. Seyyed Vali Reza Nasr (1994). The Vanguard of the Islamic Revolution: The Jama'at-i Islami of Pakistan. University of California Press. pp. 121–122. ISBN 0520083695.
  26. Lieven, Anatol (28 April 2011). "Introduction:Understanding Pakistan". Pakistan: A Hard Country. Penguin Books Ltd. pp. 3–40. ISBN 978-1-84614-160-7.
  27. Tapan Basu (1993). Khaki shorts and saffron flags: a critique of the Hindu right. Orient Blackswan. pp. 18–20. ISBN 978-0-86311-383-3.
  28. Robin W. Winks, Alaine M. Low (2001). The Oxford history of the British Empire: Historiography. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-924680-9. ... At the heart of the two-nation theory was the belief that the Indian Muslims' identity was defined by religion rather than language or ethnicity ...
  29. Liaquat Ali Khan (1940). Pakistan: The Heart of Asia. Thacker & Co. Ltd. ISBN 9781443726672. ... There is much in the Musalmans which, if they wish, can roll them into a nation. But isn't there enough that is common to both Hindus and Muslims, which if developed, is capable of moulding them into one people? Nobody can deny that there are many modes, manners, rites and customs which are common to both. Nobody can deny that there are rites, customs and usages based on religion which do divide Hindus and Muslmans. The question is, which of these should be emphasized ...
  30. Pande, Aparna (14 October 2011). "Islam in the National Story of Pakistan". Current Trends in Islamist Ideology, Volume 12. Hudson Institute. Archived from the original on 20 April 2012. Retrieved 19 November 2011.
  31. Gera Roy, Anjali; Bhatia, Nandi (2008). "Introduction". In Bhatia, Nandi (ed.). Partitioned lives: narratives of home, displacement resettlement. Pearson Education India. pp. ix–xxx. ISBN 978-81-317-1416-4.
  32. "I grew up hating India: Imran Khan". Dawn. 14 November 2011. Retrieved 5 December 2011.
  33. Shakir, Moin (18 August 1979). "Always in the Mainstream". Economic and Political Weekly. 14 (33): 1424. Even after independence, the theory of 'Muslim betrayal' has not been abandoned; it is still used by influential Hindu organisations like the RSS and Jana Sangh to prove that the Muslims are not Indians but foreigners or temporary guests – without any loyalty to the countiy or its cultural heritage – and should be driven out of the country
  34. S. M. Hali (18 April 2012). "Logic of the Two Nation Theory". The Nation. the venomous pronouncement of extremist Hindu Mahasabha, President Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, and Dr Keshav Baliram Hedgewar, the founder of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) that ... the Muslims are not Indians but foreigners or temporary guests-without any loyalty to the country or its cultural heritage-and should be driven out of the country ...
  35. Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, Sudhakar Raje (1989). Savarkar commemoration volume. Savarkar Darshan Pratishthan. ... His historic warning against conversion and call for Shuddhi was condensed in the dictum 'Dharmantar is Rashtrantar' (to change one's religion is to change one's nationality)
  36. N. Chakravarty (1990). "Mainstream". Mainstream. 28 (32–52). ... 'Dharmantar is Rashtrantar' is one of the old slogans of the VHP ...
  37. Haqqani, Husain (Winter 2004–05). "The Role of Islam in Pakistan's Future" (PDF). The Washington Quarterly. p. 89. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  38. Hashmi, Arshi. "The Arabist Shift from Indo-Persian Civilization & Genesis of Radicalization in Pakistan" (PDF). Pak Institute for Peace studies. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 April 2012. Retrieved 23 November 2011.
  39. "Pak a fragile entity survival on anti-India sentiment: Rice". The Hindu. Chennai, India. 5 May 2009. Retrieved 24 November 2011.
  40. Cohen, Stephen P. (January 2011). "The Future of Pakistan" (PDF). Brookings Institution. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 August 2011. Retrieved 25 November 2011. When it comes to its relations with its most important neighbor, India its most important international ally, the United States, its overarching narrative is that of victimhood. Pakistan’s perception of itself as the victim of Hindu domination has led to the mother of all "trust deficits," a deficit that can never be eliminated because it stems from the deeply held belief that Indians are dominating, insincere, and untrustworthy. In this view, there is nothing that Pakistan can do to normalize the relationship because Indians/Hindus are essentially untrustworthy and have proven that to be true time and time again. My view is that if trust is a component of the problem, it is an eternal one.
  41. A. H. Nayyar; Ahmed Salim (2005). The subtle subversion: the state of curricula and textbooks in Pakistan – Urdu, English, Social Studies and Civics. Sustainable Development Policy Institute.
  42. Report of the project A Civil Society Initiative in Curricula and Textbooks Reform. Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Islamabad.
  43. Hate mongering worries minorities, Daily Times (Pakistan), 25 April 2006.
  44. Cowasjee, Ardeshir (6 November 2011). "Pakistanis do not learn from history". Dawn. Retrieved 25 November 2011.
  45. Hoodbhoy, Pervez (12 July 2011). "Pakistan, the Army and the Conflict Within". Middle East Report. Middle East Research and Information Project. Retrieved 2 December 2011.
  46. Riaz 2012, pp. 63-64.
  47. http://www.acdis.uiuc.edu/Research/OPs/Saikia/SaikiaOP.pdf%5B%5D
  48. "Why Bangladesh hates India". Rediff.com. 31 December 2004. Retrieved 14 April 2012.
  49. Bangladesh slammed for persecution of Hindus, Rediff.com
  50. The Hindu Minority in Bangladesh: Legally Identified Enemies, Human Rights Documentation Centre
  51. Riaz 2012, p. 64.
  52. Parashar, Utpal (23 September 2015). "BackOffIndia! Nepal protesters slam 'interference' over statute". Retrieved 12 December 2015.
  53. "Indo-Lanka Relationships". sangam.org.
  54. Brewster, David (2014), "Maritime South Asia", India's Ocean: The Story of India's Bid for Regional Leadership, Taylor & Francis, ISBN 978-1-317-80698-1
  55. Somasundaram, Daya; Jamunanantha, CS (2002). de Jong, Joop, ed. Trauma, War, and Violence: Public Mental Health in Socio-Cultural Context. Springer. p. 213. ISBN 978-0-30646709-7.
  56. E. Valentine Daniel (11 November 1996). Charred Lullabies: Chapters in an Anthropography of Violence. p. 64. ISBN 1400822033.
  57. "Gandhi Statue Vandalised in Sri Lanka – THE HINDU". Colombo Telegraph. 7 April 2012. Retrieved 14 April 2012.
  58. "The Muslims of Burma", p.32
  59. Encyclopedia of Modern Asia, Charles Scribner's Sons, November 2002, retrieved 3 September 2009
  60. Shway Yoe (Sir James George Scott) 1882. The Burman – His Life and Notions. New York: The Norton Library 1963. pp. 436, 249–251, 348, 450.
  61. Martin Smith (1991). Burma – Insurgency and the Politics of Ethnicity. London, New Jersey: Zed Books. pp. 43–44, 98, 56–57, 176. ISBN 984-05-1499-7.
  62. Collis, Maurice (1945). Trials in Burma. London: Penguin Books. ISBN 0-404-54812-1.
  63. "Burma Citizenship Law". United Nations Human Rights Commission. 15 October 1982. Retrieved 9 October 2009.
  64. "India and Burma: working on their relationship". The Irrawaddy. Vol. 7 no. 3. March 1999. Retrieved 3 January 2014.
  65. John Slimming (1969). The Death of a Democracy. John Murray Publishers Ltd. p. 64. ISBN 978-0719520457.
  66. "Unlocking the 'Interlok' issue". The Star. 9 January 2011. Retrieved 28 January 2011.
  67. Cowell, Alan (September 1982). "A fearful reminder lingers for Asians in Kenya". The New York Times.
  68. "The Durban riots, 1949". South African History Online. Retrieved 23 October 2012.
  69. Current Africa race riots like 1949 anti-Indian riots: minister, TheIndianStar.com
  70. "Wikilivres – Coming Soon". Archived from the original on 2 July 2012. Retrieved 19 October 2016.
  71. "Wikilivres – Coming Soon". Archived from the original on 11 April 2016. Retrieved 19 October 2016.
  72. "Phumlani ka Mfeka on Twitter".
  73. "PressReader.com - Connecting People Through News". www.pressreader.com.
  74. "Calls for racist Mfeka to be punished - Public Eye". 30 October 2015.
  75. "South African court bars radical leader Phumlani Mfeka from making anti-Indian remarks". The Economic Times. 5 November 2015.
  76. "#EFFTurns4: Malema attack enrages Indians | IOL News". Retrieved 3 April 2018.
  77. "'Indians who own shops don't pay our people' – Malema's racial remarks condemned". Retrieved 10 May 2018.
  78. "Malema's remarks on Indians 'has the possibility to incite racial hatred'". News24. Retrieved 3 April 2018.
  79. General Amin and the Indian Exodus from Uganda Hasu H. Patel, Issue: A Journal of Opinion, Vol. 2, No. 4 (Winter, 1972), pp. 12-22 doi:10.2307/1166488
  80. About 10,000 Indian citizens plus some 5,000 British passport holders went to India. Canada took most of Uganda citizens (about 40,000) and the rest were taken by other countries, e.g. the US, the Netherlands, Austria, Sweden, Denmark, etc.Uganda's loss, Britain's gain -BBC
  81. 2014 World Service Poll BBC
  82. "BBC Poll: Attitudes towards Countries". GlobeScan.com. Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) at the University of Maryland. Archived from the original on 20 September 2015. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
  83. Mob Rule in Eastern Germany: Indians Attacked by Crowd at Street Party
  84. Germans probe assault on Indians
  85. German mob attacks 8 Indians at a fair
  86. "'Shame, Shame, Shame!': Readers React to German Racist Attack". Spiegel Online. 23 August 2007.
  87. 2014 World Service Poll (Influence of India) BBC
  88. Chopra, P.N. (2003). A Comprehensive History of India. 3. Sterling Publishers. p. 118. ISBN 9788120725065. Retrieved 3 March 2017.
  89. "Not his finest hour: The dark side of Winston Churchill". 27 October 2010.
  90. Singh, Hira, p. 97 (Archive)-98 (Archive).
  91. "Conflict between East Indians and Blacks". Guyana.org. 18 May 2000. Retrieved 14 April 2012.
  92. Rakesh Rampertab (15 December 2002). "Crime and Racism". Guyana Under Siege. Guyanaundersiege.com. Retrieved 27 May 2012.
  93. Rakesh Rampertab (10 April 2004). "Racism Does Influence Crime". Guyana Under Siege. Guyanaundersiege.com. Retrieved 27 May 2012.
  94. "Survival in the New World". Indo-Caribbean Heritage. 25 July 2006. Archived from the original on 29 April 2012. Retrieved 14 April 2012.
  95. Feetham, R. (1921). "The New Government of India act". Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law. 3 (1): 101–111. JSTOR 753056.
  96. Maira, Sunaina (20 June 2012). Desis in the House: Indian American Youth Culture in Nyc. Temple University Press. ISBN 9781439906736.
  97. Lavina Melwani (4 July 2010). "TIME article – Racism or Storm in a Chai-Cup?". Lassi With Lavina... A Billion Stories To Be Shared. Lavina Melwani. Retrieved 27 May 2012.
  98. "Using Lies to Foster Anti-Indian Sentiment | Blogs". ITBusinessEdge.com. 14 May 2010. Retrieved 14 April 2012.
  99. Juluri, Vamsee (18 March 2010). "Indophobia: The Real Elephant in the Living Room". Huffington Post.
  100. "UN asks Australia to investigate 'root cause' of attacks on Indian". Daily News and Analysis. 5 March 2010. Retrieved 14 April 2012.
  101. McClintock, Alex (24 January 2010). "Facebook urged to switch off hate sites". The Sydney Morning Herald.
  102. Cynthia Banham (19 June 2009). "Race-hate messages may soon be illegal". The Sydney Morning Herald. Fairfax Media. Retrieved 18 June 2012.
  103. Josh Gordon (21 February 2010). "More powers to nab net racists". The Sydney Morning Herald. Fairfax Media. Retrieved 18 June 2012.
  104. [independent.ie/world-news/looting-and-race-riots-follow-fiji-coup-attempt-26118488.html]
  105. Sheela Bhatt (14 December 2008). "The BBC cannot see the difference between a criminal and a terrorist'". Rediff India Abroad. Rediff.com India Limited. Retrieved 18 June 2012.
  106. Bhatt, Sheela (14 December 2008). "The BBC cannot see the difference between a criminal and a terrorist". Rediff.
  107. "BBC flayed for not terming Mumbai gunmen as terrorists". The Indian Express. The Indian Express Limited. 2 December 2008. Retrieved 18 June 2012.
  108. Alasdair Pinkerton (October 2008). "A new kind of imperialism? The BBC, cold war broadcasting and the contested geopolitics of south asia". Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television. 28 (4): 537–555. doi:10.1080/01439680802310324.
  109. Ajai K. Rai (June 2000). "Conflict Situations and the Media: A Critical Look". Strategic Analysis. Routledge (Taylor and Francis Group). 24 (3): 585–601. doi:10.1080/09700160008455233.
  110. Booker, Christopher (14 March 2015). "Why to blacken India on rape do they have to omit the facts?". The Telegraph. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
  111. Hillary, India And 'The New York Times', Sumit Ganguly, Forbes Magazine
  112. "Indophobia: The Real Elephant in the Living Room". The Huffington Post. 18 March 2010.
  113. "Indian-American lawmaker blasts NYT for anti-India editorial". The Indian Express. The Indian Express Limited. 21 July 2009. Retrieved 18 June 2012.
  114. Park, Madison. "India's spacecraft reaches Mars orbit ... and history". CNN. Retrieved 26 July 2016.
  115. "India's Budget Mission to Mars". The New York Times. 28 September 2014. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 26 July 2016.
  116. Writer, Sharanya Haridas; Mumbai-raised, Journalist; dream, Manhattan-residing Accidental Author-Publisher-Entrepreneur I. am Guy Kawasaki's (30 September 2014). "The 'New York Times' Publishes Racist Comic About India's Space Mission". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 26 July 2016.
  117. "Controversial India Cartoon Forces New York Times to Apologize – NBC News". Retrieved 26 July 2016.
  118. The Editorial Board (4 June 2016). "No Exceptions for a Nuclear India". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 21 July 2016.
  119. "President Obama backs Indian entry to nuclear technology – BBC News". BBC News. 8 June 2016. Retrieved 21 July 2016.
  120. Thakur, Ramesh (9 June 2016). "The New York Times's Bias Should Not Surprise Us Anymore – The Wire". The Wire. Retrieved 21 July 2016.
  121. "Asia Unbound » India, Global Governance, and the Nuclear Suppliers Group". Archived from the original on 18 July 2016. Retrieved 21 July 2016.
  122. Qadri, Asgar (12 November 2017). "In India, Fashion Has Become a Nationalist Cause".
  123. Surendran, Vivek (14 November 2017). "Indian Twitter users roast New York Times for sari state of affairs".
  124. Dutt, Barkha (17 November 2017). "The New York Times tried to explain sari fashion – and became the laughingstock of India".
  125. Gautam, Nishtha. "Back Off NYT, I'm a Sari & I'm Not a Tool in the Hands of Hindutva".
  126. Kaur, Nehmat (15 November 2017). "The Sari Has Never Been About a 'Hindu' Identity".
  127. Shah, Tayyab (18 March 2010). "Zaid Hamid and Ghuzwa-i-Hind". Daily Times (Pakistan). Retrieved 19 November 2011.
  128. Ali, Farhana. "Lashkar-i-Tayyiba Remains Committed to Jihad" (PDF). CTC Sentinel: March 2009, Vol 2. Combating Terrorism Center. Retrieved 19 November 2011.
  129. "Pakistan destined to defeat India: Nizami". The Nation. 11 March 2010. Archived from the original on 16 March 2010. Retrieved 24 November 2011.
  130. "WikiLeaks hoax hits Pakistan media". Al Jazeera English. 10 December 2010. Retrieved 9 December 2011.
  131. "Wikileaks: Pakistan hoaxed by bogus anti-India cables". BBC. 10 December 2010. Retrieved 9 December 2011.
  132. Walsh, Declan (9 December 2010). "Pakistani media publish fake WikiLeaks cables attacking India". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 9 December 2011.
  133. "Pakistani media: Fake WikiLeaks cables attacking India published". The Express Tribune. 10 December 2010. Retrieved 9 December 2011.
  134. Madhur Singh (26 January 2009). "Slumdog Millionaire, an Oscar Favorite, Is No Hit in India". Time. Retrieved 27 January 2009.
  135. Zakaria, Fareed. "Slum Voyeurism?", 30 January 2009
  136. "Bihar deploys police after "Slumdog" protests". Reuters. 27 January 2009. Retrieved 27 January 2009.
  137. Kinetz, Erica (22 January 2009). "Mumbai residents object to 'Slumdog' title". USA Today. Associated Press. Retrieved 26 January 2009.
  138. "'Slumdog Millionaire,' an Oscar Favorite, Is No Hit in India – TIME". TIME.com. 26 January 2009.
  139. "Slumdog Millionaire faces protests in India". Indo-Asian News Service. NDTV. 27 January 2009. Archived from the original on 31 January 2009. Retrieved 27 January 2009.
  140. Jurgensen, John (9 January 2009). "The Co-Pilot of 'Slumdog'. The Wall Street Journal". Online.wsj.com. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  141. Indo-Asian News Service (31 January 2009). "I don't make films for awards: Aamir Khan". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 4 February 2009. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  142. Press Trust of India (31 January 2009). "No Obama-like leader in Indian politics: Aamir". India Today. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  143. Jha, Subhash K. (1 February 2009). "Slumdog... is trashy: Priyadarshan". NDTV. Archived from the original on 4 February 2009. Retrieved 1 February 2009.
  144. Aadesh Shrivastava outraged at Bachchan's portrayal in Slumdog Millionaire, bollywoodhungama.com
Sources

Further reading
  • Idi Amin & Indophobia: General Amin and the Indian Exodus from Uganda by Hasu H. Patel, Issue: A Journal of Opinion, Vol. 2, No. 4 (Winter, 1972), pp. 12–22. JSTOR 1166488
  • Trautmann, Thomas R. (1997). "British Indophobia". Aryans and British India. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-20546-8.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • K.K. Aziz. (2004) The Murder of History : A Critique of History Textbooks used in Pakistan. Vanguard. ISBN 969-402-126-X
  • Nayyar, A. H. & Salim, Ahmad. (2003) The Subtle Subversion: The State of Curricula and Text-books in Pakistan - Urdu, English, Social Studies and Civics. Sustainable Development Policy Institute. The Subtle Subversion
  • Rosser, Yvette Claire (2003). Islamization of Pakistani Social Studies Textbooks. New Delhi: Rupa & Co. ISBN 81-291-0221-8.
  • Rosser, Yvette Claire (2004). Indoctrinating Minds: Politics of Education in Bangladesh. New Delhi: Rupa & Co. ISBN 8129104318.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.