Jargon

Jargon is the specialized terminology associated with a particular field or area of activity.[1] Jargon is normally employed in a particular communicative context and may not be well understood outside that context. The context is usually a particular occupation (that is, a certain trade, profession, vernacular, or academic field), but any ingroup can have jargon. The main trait that distinguishes jargon from the rest of a language is special vocabulary—including some words specific to it, and often different senses or meanings of words, that outgroups would tend to take in another sense—therefore misunderstanding that communication attempt. Jargon is sometimes understood as a form of technical slang and then distinguished from the official terminology used in a particular field of activity.[2]

For other uses, see Jargon (disambiguation).

The terms jargon, slang, and argot are not consistently differentiated in the literature; different authors interpret these concepts in varying ways. According to one definition, jargon differs from slang in being secretive in nature;[3] according to another understanding, it is specifically associated with professional and technical circles.[4] Some sources, however, treat these terms as synonymous.[5][6] In Russian linguistics, jargon is classified as an expressive form of language, while secret languages are referred to as argots.[7]

Specifics

Jargon is "the technical terminology or characteristic idiom of a special activity or group".[8] Most jargon is technical terminology (technical terms), involving terms of art[9] or industry terms, with particular meaning within a specific industry. A main driving force in the creation of technical jargon is precision and efficiency of communication, when a discussion must easily range from general themes to specific, finely differentiated details without circumlocution. Jargon enriches everyday vocabulary with meaningful content and can potentially become a catchword.[10]

While jargon allows greater efficiency in communication among those familiar with it, a side-effect is that it raises the threshold of comprehensibility for outsiders. This is usually accepted as an unavoidable trade-off, but it may also be used as a means of social exclusion (reinforcing ingroup–outgroup barriers) or social aspiration (when introduced as a way of showing off). Some academics promote the use of jargon-free language, as an audience may be alienated or confused by the technical terminology, and thus lose track of a speaker or writer's broader and more important arguments.[11]

Etymology

The French word is believed to have been derived from the Latin word gaggire, meaning "to chatter", which was used to describe speech that the listener did not understand.[12] The word may also come from Old French jargon meaning "chatter of birds".[12] Middle English also has the verb jargounen meaning "to chatter," or "twittering," deriving from Old French.[13]

The first use of the word dates back to the usage of the word in The Canterbury Tales written by Geoffrey Chaucer between 1387 and 1400. Chaucer referred to jargon as the utterance of birds or sounds resembling birds.[13]

In colonial history, jargon was seen as a device of communication to bridge the gap between two speakers who did not speak the same tongue. Jargon was synonymous with pidgin in naming specific language usages. Jargon then began to have a negative connotation with lacking coherent grammar, or gibberish as it was seen as a "broken" language of many different languages with no full community to call their own. In the 1980s, linguists began restricting this usage of jargon to keep the word to more commonly define a technical or specialized language use.[14]

Fields using the term

The term is used, often interchangeably, with the term buzzword[15] when examining organizational culture.[16] In linguistics, it is used to mean "specialist language,"[17] with the term also seen as closely related to slang, argot and cant.[18] Various kinds of language peculiar to ingroups can be named across a semantic field. Slang can be either culture-wide or known only within a certain group or subculture. Argot is slang or jargon purposely used to obscure meaning to outsiders. Conversely, a lingua franca is used for the opposite effect, helping communicators to overcome unintelligibility, as are pidgins and creole languages. For example, the Chinook Jargon was a pidgin.[19] Although technical jargon's primary purpose is to aid technical communication, not to exclude outsiders by serving as an argot, it can have both effects at once and can provide a technical ingroup with shibboleths. For example, medieval guilds could use this as one means of informal protectionism. On the other hand, jargon that once was obscure outside a small ingroup can become generally known over time. For example, the terms bit, byte, and hexadecimal (which are terms from computing jargon[20]) are now recognized by many people outside computer science.

Referenced

The philosopher Étienne Bonnot de Condillac observed in 1782 that "every science requires a special language because every science has its own ideas". As a rationalist member of the Enlightenment, he continued: "It seems that one ought to begin by composing this language, but people begin by speaking and writing, and the language remains to be composed."[21]

Industry term

"An industry term... is a type of technical terminology that has a particular meaning in a specific industry. It implies that a word or phrase is a typical one in a particular industry and people working in the respective industry or business will be familiar with and use the term."[22]

Precise technical terms and their definitions are formally recognized, documented, and taught by educators in the field. Other terms are more colloquial, coined and used by practitioners in the field, and are similar to slang. The boundaries between formal and slang jargon, as in general English, are quite fluid. This is especially true in the rapidly developing world of computers and networking. For instance, the term firewall (in the sense of a device used to filter network traffic) was at first technical slang. As these devices became more widespread and the term became widely understood, the word was adopted as formal terminology.[23]

Technical terminology evolves due to the need for experts in a field to communicate with precision and brevity, but often has the effect of excluding those who are unfamiliar with the particular specialized language of the group. This can cause difficulties as, for example, when a patient is unable to follow the discussions of medical practitioners, and thus cannot understand his own condition and treatment. Differences in jargon also cause difficulties where professionals in related fields use different terms for the same phenomena.[24]

In practice

Jargon may serve the purpose of a "gatekeeper" in conversation, signaling who is allowed into certain forms of conversation. Jargon may serve this function by dictating to which direction or depth a conversation about or within the context of a certain field or profession will go.[25] For example, a conversation between two professionals in which one person has little previous interaction or knowledge of the other person could go one of at least two possible ways. One of the professionals (who the other professional does not know) does not use, or does not correctly use the jargon of their respective field, and is little regarded or remembered beyond small talk or fairly insignificant in this conversation. Or, if the person does use particular jargon (showing their knowledge in the field to be legitimate, educated, or of particular significance) the other professional then opens the conversation up in an in-depth or professional manner.[25]

Positivity

Ethos is used to create an appeal to authority. It is one of three pillars of persuasion created by Aristotle to create a logical argument. Ethos uses credibility to back up arguments. It can indicate to the audience that a speaker is an insider with using specialized terms in the field to make an argument based on authority and credibility.[26]

Jargon can be used to convey meaningful information and discourse in a convenient way within communities. A subject expert may wish to avoid jargon when explaining something to a layperson. Jargon may help communicate contextual information optimally.[27] For example, a football coach talking to their team or a doctor working with nurses.[28]

Accessibility and criticism

With the rise of the self-advocacy movement within the disability movement, jargonized language has been much objected to by advocates and self-advocates. Jargon is largely present in everyday language, in newspapers, government documents, and official forms. Several advocacy organizations work on influencing public agents to offer accessible information in different formats.[29] One accessible format that offers an alternative to jargonised language is Easy Read, which consists of a combination of plain English and images.

The criticism against jargon can be found in certain fields when responding to specific information. In a study done by analyzing 58 patients and 10 radiation therapists, they diagnosed and explained the treatment of a disease to a patient with the use of jargon. It was found that using jargon in the medical field is not the best in communicating the terminology and concepts. Patients tend to be confused about what were the treatments and the risks.[30] There are resources that include online glossaries of technical jargon, also known as a "jargon busters."[31]

Examples

Many examples of jargon exist because of its use among specialists and subcultures alike. In the professional world, those who are in the business of filmmaking may use words like "vorkapich" to refer to a montage when talking to colleagues.[32] In Rhetoric, rhetoricians use words like "arete" to refer to a person of power's character when speaking with one another.[33]

gollark: My closed-source things are mostly closed-source because:- they are trivial and I do not care enough to move them to random-stuff- they contain osmarks.net implementation details or personal data I have not bothered to disentangle- the code is too ææææææææ to release
gollark: They also did open *some* things.
gollark: In the 2022-2023 fiscal year, we intend to get more GPU compute and upgrade the neural nets.
gollark: Worse than the helloboi neural nets.
gollark: For a Markov chain, it writes surprisingly nonawfully.

See also

References
  1. Murray, Neil (2012). Writing Essays in English Language and Linguistics: Principles, Tips and Strategies for Undergraduates. Cambridge University Press. p. 147. ISBN 9780521111195.
  2. Polskaya, Svetlana (2011). "Differentiating between various categories of special vocabulary (on the material of a professionals speech of English-speaking stock exchange brokers)". In Raţă, Georgeta (ed.). Academic Days of Timişoara: Language Education Today. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 519. ISBN 9781443833165.
  3. Piekot, Tomasz (2008). Język w grupie społecznej: wprowadzenie do analizy socjolektu (in Polish). Wałbrzych: Wydawnictwo Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Zawodowej im. Angelusa Silesiusa. p. 28. ISBN 9788388425387. OCLC 297524942.
  4. Forsyth, Patrick (2007). Outsmarting Your Competitors: Techniques of Sales Excellence to Build Profitable Business. Marshall Cavendish. p. 88. ISBN 9789812614483.
  5. Grzenia, Jan (2005-04-25). "gwara a żargon". Poradnia PWN (in Polish). sjp.pwn.pl. Retrieved 2019-04-26.
  6. Mistrík, Jozef (1993). Encyklopédia jazykovedy (in Slovak) (1 ed.). Bratislava: Obzor. p. 385. ISBN 8021502509. OCLC 29200758.
  7. Kortas, Jan (2003). "Terminy "argot", "argotyzm" w polskiej nomenklaturze językoznawczej". Poradnik Językowy (in Polish). Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. 2003 (7): 29–38. ISSN 0551-5343.
  8. "Jargon". Merriam Webster. Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 5 April 2013. Retrieved 29 March 2013.
  9. "Term of art". Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
  10. Wodak, Ruth (1989). Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in political discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 1–288. ISBN 9789027286055.
  11. Ross, Steven (2014). "Jargon and the Crisis of Readability: Methodology, Language, and the Future of Film History". Cinema Journal. 44 (1): 130–133. doi:10.1353/cj.2004.0052. JSTOR 3661180.
  12. "Jargon". Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved April 28, 2018.
  13. Martinuzzi, Bruna. "The History of Jargon". American Express. American Express Company. Retrieved 22 February 2019.
  14. Mufwene, Salikoko Sangol. "Jargon | linguistics". Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 22 February 2019.
  15. Collins, David (2013-10-11). Management Fads and Buzzwords: Critical-Practical Perspectives. ISBN 9781136295089.
  16. Martin, J. and Frost, P., 2011. The organizational culture war games. Sociology of Organizations: Structures and relationships, 315.
  17. Allan, Keith (2017). The English Language and Linguistics Companion. p. 18. ISBN 978-1-349-92395-3.
  18. Adams, Michael (2012-09-01). Slang: The People's Poetry. ISBN 9780199986538.
  19. "Jargon | linguistics".
  20. Lundin, Leigh (2009-12-31). "Buzzwords– bang * splat !". Don Martin School of Software. Criminal Brief.
  21. Quoted by Fernand Braudel, in discussing the origins of capital, capitalism, in The Wheels of Commerce, vol. II of Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century, 1979:234. Originally found in Condillac's work Le Commerce et le gouvernement considérés relativement l'un à l'autre (1776).
  22. Peterlicean, Andrea (2015). "Challenges and perspectives in teaching specialised languages". The Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education. 8: 149–162. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  23. Monografias.com, jaimemontoya. "Technical Terminology - Monografias.com". www.monografias.com (in Spanish). Retrieved 22 February 2019.
  24. Jirtle, James. "Words in English :: Usage". www.ruf.rice.edu. 2003, James Jirtle. Retrieved 22 February 2019.
  25. Campbell, Gordon (2014-01-22), "Jargon", Oxford Art Online, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.t2072529
  26. "Ethos". Philosophy Terms. 1 December 2015.
  27. Boggs, Colleen Glenney (27 November 2012). "In Defense of Jargon". Huffington Post. Retrieved 1 March 2019.
  28. Dodge, Amanda (23 August 2013). "The Pros and Cons of Using Jargon". Copypress. Retrieved 1 March 2019.
  29. Lundin, Leigh (2013-04-05). "Jargon buster – Accessible Information * splat !". Northampton Borough Council. Northampton Borough Council.
  30. Schnitzler, Lena; et al. (9 August 2016). "Communication during radiation therapy education sessions: The role of medical jargon and emotional support in clarifying patient confusion". Patient Education and Counseling. 100 (1): 112–120. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.006. PMID 27542311.
  31. Lundin, Leigh (2013-04-05). "Jargon buster – Involve * splat !". Involve.
  32. "Cinematic Terms – A FilmMaking Glossary". filmsite.org.
  33. "Dictionary.com - Find the Meanings and Definitions of Words at Dictionary.com". Dictionary.com.

Further reading
  • Green, Jonathon. Dictionary of Jargon. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1987. ISBN 0-7100-9919-3.
  • Nash, Walter. Jargon: Its Uses and Abuses. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993. ISBN 0-631-18063-X.
  • Sonneveld, H., Loenning, K.: (1994): "Introducing terminology", in Terminology, p. 1–6
  • Wright, S. E.; Budin, G.: (1997): Handbook of Terminology Management, Volume 1: Basic Aspects of Terminology Management. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 370 pp.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.