English votes for English laws

English votes for English laws (EVEL) is a set of procedures of the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom whereby legislation which affects only England requires the support of a majority of MPs representing English constituencies. The procedures were developed following devolution in the United Kingdom as a result of the West Lothian question, a concern about the perceived inequity of MPs from Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, sitting in the House of Commons being able to vote on matters that affected only England, while MPs from England were unable to vote on matters that had been devolved to the Northern Ireland Assembly, the Scottish Parliament and the Senedd Cymru.[1]

This article is part of a series on
United Kingdom politics
 United Kingdom portal

During the 2000s a number of pieces of legislation which affected only or mainly England were passed by the UK Parliament, although the votes cast by MPs were such that the legislation would not have been passed if only the votes cast by MPs representing English constituencies had been counted.[2] The opposition Conservative Party in 2008 commissioned a report, "Devolution, The West Lothian Question and the Future of the Union", which proposed some procedural changes restricting the participation of MPs representing non-English constituencies during the passage of bills relating only to England.

While the Conservatives were in government from 2010–15 in coalition with the Liberal Democrats, they set up the McKay Commission to look into the question. The Commission proposed that bills in the House of Commons which affected England solely or differently should require a majority vote of MPs representing English constituencies.[3] The Conservative manifesto for the 2015 general election included a proposal that England-only legislation should require approval from a Legislative Grand Committee prior to its Third Reading in the House of Commons.[4] Having won a majority in that election, the Conservative government used a change in standing orders in October 2015 to give MPs representing English constituencies a "veto" over laws only affecting England.[5]

Background

Following the establishment of the Scottish Parliament in 1999, it was suggested by Conservative MPs that Scottish MPs should be barred from voting on matters that do not affect Scotland.[6] In July 1999, Conservative Party leader William Hague said that "English MPs should have exclusive say over English laws ... People will become increasingly resentful that decisions are being made in England by people from other parts of the UK on matters that English people did not have a say on elsewhere ... I think it is a dangerous thing to allow resentment to build up in a country. We have got to make the rules fair now."[7]

In establishing foundation hospitals and increasing student tuition fees in England, Scottish votes were decisive in getting the measures through.[8] The vote on foundation hospitals in November 2003 only applied to England – had the vote been restricted to English MPs then the government would have been defeated.[9] Had there been a vote by English MPs only on tuition fees in January 2004, the government would have lost because of a rebellion on their own benches.[10] Students at English universities are required to pay top-up fees, but students from Scotland attending Scottish universities are not. The legislation imposing top-up fees on students in England passed by a small majority of 316 to 311. At the time, the shadow education secretary Tim Yeo argued that this low majority made the passing of the law "completely wrong" due to Scottish MPs voting to introduce tuition fees that Scottish students attending university in Scotland would not have to pay.[2][11] A small part of the bill did relate directly to Scotland.[12]

Following his election as Leader of the Conservative Party in 2005, David Cameron established a "Democracy Taskforce" chaired by Kenneth Clarke. The taskforce's final report "Devolution, The West Lothian question and the Future of the Union" proposed a possible solution to the West Lothian question. The proposals called for changes in procedures in the House of Commons for the passage of bills relating only to England. Under the new procedures, all MPs would participate in the first and second readings of these bills, but only English MPs would participate in the committee stage consideration of the bill. All MPs would vote on the final bill at report stage.[13] An amendment proposed by Malcolm Rifkind suggested that the second reading and report stages of bills would require a "double majority" of both the House as a whole and of English MPs.[14]

Labour politician Jack Straw has speculated: "I say to the Conservatives that if they start to take a mechanical approach, this so-called 'English votes for English laws' approach, then they will break the Union."[15]

McKay Commission
See also: Commission on the consequences of devolution for the House of Commons

The May 2010 coalition agreement between the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrats provided for a commission to be established to consider the West Lothian question.[16] In September 2011, the Government announced that the commission would be established in the near future and that it would consist of "independent, non-partisan experts". The new commission would examine how the House of Commons and Parliament as a whole could deal with business that affects only England and is devolved in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The commission would not look at reducing the number of MPs from the other three constituent countries or financing of the devolved institutions.[17]

The McKay Commission reported on 25 March 2013.[18][19] It concluded that changes were needed because of the perception that England was disadvantaged under the current devolution arrangements, and proposed that Commons decisions with a "separate and distinct effect" for England should "normally be taken only with the consent of a majority of MPs sitting for constituencies in England". This principle should be enshrined by a resolution of the House of Commons. The Commission also proposed a number of changes to procedure, including allocating specific parliamentary time to proposals for England. The government said it would give the report "serious consideration".[3]

On 18 September 2014, the people of Scotland voted against independence in a referendum by 55.3% to 44.7%. Shortly after the outcome of the vote was announced, the Prime Minister, David Cameron, stated that the "question of English votes for English laws – the so-called West Lothian question – requires a decisive answer." He announced the appointment of Lord Smith to lead a commission to develop proposals for constitutional reform to be included in a Bill to be published in January 2015.[20] Labour refused to engage in cross party discussions about the issue.[21]

Developments after the 2015 general election

The governance of England featured in the 2015 general election manifestos of the three main political parties in England. The Conservative manifesto supported the idea of "English Votes for English Laws", with England-only legislation requiring approval from a Legislative Grand Committee prior to its Third Reading. In the case of legislation applying to both England and Wales, or to England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the Legislative Grand Committee would consist of MPs from both England and Wales or England, Wales and Northern Ireland. It proposed a separate English rate of Income Tax and rejected regional governance in England.[22][23][4]

The Labour Party manifesto stated that it was time to "consider how English MPs can have a greater role in scrutiny of legislation that only affects England" and suggested that an English Grand Committee stage for legislation could be considered.[24] The Liberal Democrat manifesto proposed that England-only legislation be considered by a committee of MPs with membership based on share of the vote in England. It proposed a system of "Devolution on Demand" where councils or groups of councils could request further powers from Central Government. It supported the principle of an assembly for Cornwall.[25]

The Conservatives won an overall majority in the election and formed the government of the United Kingdom. On 2 July 2015, Chris Grayling, Leader of the House of Commons, announced proposals to change standing orders to give MPs representing English constituencies a new "veto" over laws only affecting England. On 9 July 2015, Grayling said that, following two days of debate in July, a final set of standing orders would be tabled and voted on after the summer recess.[26] Labour said the "reckless and shoddy" plans had descended into "chaos" while the SNP said it was a "shambles".[27] The new procedures were approved by a Commons vote in October 2015[5] and used for the first time in the House of Commons in January 2016.[28][29]

The revised process is:[30]

  • The Speaker judges which parts of a bill relate to just England, or England and Wales
  • An England-only committee stage considers bills deemed "England-only in their entirety"
  • Membership of this committee reflects the number of MPs each party has in England
  • Where sections of legislation relate only to England or England and Wales, the agreement of a Legislative Grand Committee composed of all English, English and Welsh or English, Welsh and Northern Irish MPs, is required

In November 2016 the Centre on Constitutional Change published a report on the operation of the procedures during their first year, arguing that EVEL has avoided many of the problems predicted by its critics and recommending some improvements.[31] As a result of the 2017 general election, the Conservative Party lost its House of Commons majority, but had a majority of 60 on English issues.[32] The Conservatives later regained a majority of 81 seats in the 2019 general election,[33] at the same time winning 345 out of the 533 seats in England.[34]

gollark: Libraries can use whatever bad case convention they want and I can use the correct one.
gollark: The identifier thing is rather cool.
gollark: I think some of my code does it a bit.
gollark: Every hertz^-2.
gollark: Nim would be better if it magically had good libraries.

References
  1. "Hague and Brown clash over 'English votes for English laws'". BBC News. BBC. 14 October 2014. Retrieved 14 October 2014. But Mr Hague said the issue of "English votes for English laws", known as the West Lothian Question, had been talked about for nearly 20 years but nothing had been done.
  2. "Scots MPs attacked over fees vote". BBC News. 27 January 2004.
  3. "England-only laws 'need majority from English MPs'". BBC News. 25 March 2013.
  4. "Election 2015: PM sets out 'English votes' timetable". BBC News Online. 24 April 2015. Retrieved 4 July 2015.
  5. "English vote plan to become law despite objections". BBC News. BBC. 22 October 2015. Retrieved 24 October 2015.
  6. "If it's English vote for English law, the UK's end is nigh". The Guardian. 12 June 2006.
  7. "English votes on English laws". BBC News. BBC. 15 July 1999.
  8. Gallop, Nick in The Constitution and Constitutional Reform p.27 (Philip Allan, 2011) ISBN 978-0-340-98720-9
  9. McSmith, Andy (4 July 2006). "The Big Question: What is the West Lothian question, and can it be resolved satisfactorily?". The Independent. London.
  10. "The West Lothian Question: Labour MPs want answers". thescotsman.com. 19 November 2007. Retrieved 9 July 2013.
  11. "Blair wins key top-up fees vote". BBC News. 27 January 2004.
  12. "Scottish Devolution and West Lothian Question". BBC h2g2. 19 September 2006.
  13. (PDF) http://www.toque.co.uk/witan/docs/DTF_Answering_the_Question.pdf. Retrieved 23 July 2010. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  14. (PDF) http://www.toque.co.uk/witan/docs/ClarkeVRifkind.pdf. Retrieved 23 July 2010. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  15. Hamish Macdonell and Gerri Peev (2007). "The West Lothian Question: Labour MPs want answers". The Scotsman. Retrieved 12 May 2010.
  16. "Share The Facts".
  17. "Answer sought to the West Lothian question". BBC News. BBC. 8 September 2011. Retrieved 8 September 2011.
  18. Report of McKay Commission (Report). 25 March 2013.
  19. "England-only laws 'need majority from English MPs'". BBC News. BBC. 25 March 2013. Retrieved 25 March 2013.
  20. "David Cameron sets out UK-wide changes 'to build better future'". BBC News. 19 September 2014.
  21. "Labour rules out talks on 'English votes for English laws'". BBC News. 14 October 2014.
  22. "The Conservative Party Manifesto 2015" (PDF). The Conservative Party. p. 49. Retrieved 12 June 2017.
  23. "Election 2015: Tory pledge over English laws veto condemned in Scotland". BBC News Online. 14 April 2015. Retrieved 4 July 2015.
  24. "Britain can be better: The Labour Party Manifesto 2015" (PDF). The Labour Party. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 June 2017. Retrieved 12 June 2017.
  25. "The Complete Manifesto". Liberal Democrats.
  26. Watt, Nicholas (9 July 2015). "English votes for English laws plan to be revised after Commons revolt". The Guardian. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  27. "English votes for English laws plan to be delayed". BBC News. BBC. 9 July 2015. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  28. "'English votes' rules used for first time in House of Commons". BBC News. 12 January 2016. Retrieved 12 January 2016.
  29. Wiener, Libby (12 January 2016). "English votes for English laws 'is driving Scotland out' of the UK, SNP MP claims". ITV News. Retrieved 12 January 2016.
  30. "New 'veto' announced for English MPs". BBC News. BBC. 2 July 2015. Retrieved 4 July 2015.
  31. "One year of EVEL: evaluating 'English votes for English laws' in the House of Commons". The Constitution Unit blog. 28 November 2016.
  32. Stephen Bush (9 June 2017). "Jeremy Corbyn has won a great victory – and so have the Liberal Democrats". New Statesman.
  33. Baker, Carl; Uberoi, Elise (13 December 2019). "General Election 2019: The results". House of Commons Library. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
  34. "Results of the 2019 General Election in England". BBC News. Retrieved 3 February 2019.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.