Lagarde-Hachan

Lagarde-Hachan is a commune in the Gers department in southwestern France.

Lagarde-Hachan
A general view of Lagarde-Hachan
Location of Lagarde-Hachan
Lagarde-Hachan
Lagarde-Hachan
Coordinates: 43°24′27″N 0°29′40″E
CountryFrance
RegionOccitanie
DepartmentGers
ArrondissementMirande
CantonMirande-Astarac
IntercommunalityVals et villages en Astarac
Government
  Mayor (20082014) Francis Lescure
Area
1
8.57 km2 (3.31 sq mi)
Population
 (2017-01-01)[1]
164
  Density19/km2 (50/sq mi)
Time zoneUTC+01:00 (CET)
  Summer (DST)UTC+02:00 (CEST)
INSEE/Postal code
32177 /32300
Elevation202–285 m (663–935 ft)
(avg. 300 m or 980 ft)
1 French Land Register data, which excludes lakes, ponds, glaciers > 1 km2 (0.386 sq mi or 247 acres) and river estuaries.

Geography

The Petite Baïse forms part of the commune's western border.

Lagarde-Hachan and its surrounding communes

Population

Historical population
YearPop.±%
1962194    
1968187−3.6%
1975154−17.6%
1982131−14.9%
1990118−9.9%
1999131+11.0%
2008165+26.0%
gollark: For example:- the average person probably does *some* sort of illegal/shameful/bad/whatever stuff, and if some organization has information on that it can use it against people it wants to discredit (basically, information leads to power, so information asymmetry leads to power asymmetry). This can happen if you decide to be an activist or something much later, even- having lots of data on you means you can be manipulated more easily (see, partly, targeted advertising, except that actually seems to mostly be poorly targeted)- having a government be more effective at detecting minor crimes (which reduced privacy could allow for) might *not* actually be a good thing, as some crimes (drug use, I guess?) are kind of stupid and at least somewhat tolerable because they *can't* be entirely enforced practically
gollark: No, it probably isn't your fault, it must have been dropped from my brain stack while I was writing the rest.
gollark: ... I forgot one of them, hold on while I try and reremember it.
gollark: That's probably one of them. I'm writing.
gollark: > If you oppose compromises to privacy on the grounds that you could do something that is misidentified as a crime, being more transparent does helpI mean, sure. But I worry about lacking privacy for reasons other than "maybe the government will use partial data or something and accidentally think I'm doing crimes".

See also

References

  1. "Populations légales 2017". INSEE. Retrieved 6 January 2020.



This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.