Composite Index of National Capability
The Composite Index of National Capability (CINC) is a statistical measure of national power created by J. David Singer for the Correlates of War project in 1963. It uses an average of percentages of world totals in six different components. The components represent demographic, economic, and military strength.[1] More recent studies tend to use the (CINC) score, which “focuses on measures that are more salient to the perception of true state power” beyond GDP.[2] It is still “among the best-known and most accepted methods for measuring national capabilities.”[3] The CINC only measures hard powers and may not represent soft powers or total national power.
Methodology
Each component is a dimensionless percentage of the world's total.
RATIO=
CINC =
Where
TPR = total population of country ratio
UPR = urban population of country ratio
ISPR = iron and steel production of country ratio
ECR = primary energy consumption ratio
MER = military expenditure ratio
MPR = military personnel ratio
List of countries by CINC
Countries listed by CINC, data is from 2007[4]
Number | Country | CINC |
---|---|---|
1 | .198566 | |
2 | .142149 | |
3 | .073444 | |
4 | .042675 | |
5 | .039274 | |
6 | .024545 | |
7 | .024082 | |
8 | .023878 | |
9 | .021158 | |
10 | .018924 | |
11 | .017420 | |
12 | .014317 | |
13 | .013772 | |
14 | .013708 | |
15 | .013450 | |
16 | .012925 | |
17 | .012269 | |
18 | .011835 | |
19 | .011389 | |
20 | .010883 | |
21 | .010683 | |
22 | .009713 | |
23 | .008060 | |
24 | .008010 | |
25 | .007973 | |
26 | .007792 | |
27 | .007612 | |
28 | .007113 | |
29 | .006939 | |
30 | .006395 | |
31 | .006316 | |
32 | .006174 | |
33 | .005722 | |
34 | .005646 | |
35 | .005290 | |
36 | .005222 | |
37 | .004721 | |
38 | .004559 | |
39 | .004471 | |
40 | .004454 | |
41 | .004403 | |
42 | .004175 | |
43 | .003895 | |
44 | .003858 | |
45 | .003813 | |
46 | .003638 | |
47 | .003233 | |
48 | .003226 | |
49 | .003213 | |
50 | .003107 | |
51 | .003076 | |
52 | .002986 | |
53 | .002980 | |
54 | .002979 | |
55 | .002572 | |
56 | .002557 | |
57 | .002483 | |
58 | .002353 | |
59 | .002256 | |
60 | .002157 | |
61 | .002144 | |
62 | .002078 | |
63 | .001932 | |
64 | .001841 | |
65 | .001777 | |
66 | .001763 | |
67 | .001640 | |
68 | .001608 | |
69 | .001556 | |
70 | .001556 | |
71 | .001518 | |
72 | .001493 | |
73 | .001448 | |
74 | .001437 | |
75 | .001433 | |
76 | .001422 | |
77 | .001420 | |
78 | .001352 | |
79 | .001334 | |
80 | .001320 | |
81 | .001279 | |
82 | .001217 | |
83 | .001173 | |
84 | .001109 | |
85 | .001083 | |
86 | .001050 | |
87 | .001032 | |
88 | .000994 | |
89 | .000974 | |
90 | .000969 | |
91 | .000951 | |
92 | .000884 | |
93 | .000844 | |
94 | .000822 | |
95 | .000789 | |
96 | .000771 | |
97 | .000749 | |
98 | .000711 | |
99 | .000697 | |
100 | .000659 | |
101 | .000645 | |
102 | .000635 | |
103 | .000614 | |
104 | .000581 | |
105 | .000580 | |
106 | .000575 | |
107 | .000568 | |
108 | .000562 | |
109 | .000542 | |
110 | .000531 | |
111 | .000527 | |
112 | .000516 | |
113 | .000505 | |
114 | .000504 | |
115 | .000474 | |
116 | .000471 | |
117 | .000458 | |
118 | .000454 | |
119 | .000450 | |
120 | .000442 | |
121 | .000428 | |
122 | .000400 | |
123 | .000393 | |
124 | .000390 | |
125 | .000388 | |
126 | .000370 | |
127 | .000361 | |
128 | .000357 | |
129 | .000354 | |
130 | .000352 | |
131 | .000346 | |
132 | .000346 | |
133 | .000345 | |
134 | .000297 | |
135 | .000290 | |
136 | .000276 | |
137 | .000270 | |
138 | .000253 | |
139 | .000249 | |
140 | .000240 | |
141 | .000237 | |
142 | .000223 | |
143 | .000206 | |
144 | .000202 | |
145 | .000196 | |
146 | .000192 | |
147 | .000187 | |
148 | .000179 | |
149 | .000153 | |
150 | .000150 | |
151 | .000145 | |
152 | .000133 | |
153 | .000132 | |
154 | .000113 | |
155 | .000109 | |
156 | .000098 | |
157 | .000081 | |
158 | .000062 | |
159 | .000058 | |
160 | .000057 | |
161 | .000051 | |
162 | .000049 | |
163 | .000046 | |
164 | .000044 | |
165 | .000043 | |
166 | .000035 | |
167 | .000029 | |
168 | .000024 | |
169 | .000022 | |
170 | .000021 | |
171 | .000020 | |
172 | .000013 | |
173 | .000006 | |
174 | .000006 | |
175 | .000005 | |
176 | .000005 | |
177 | .000004 | |
178 | .000003 | |
179 | .000003 | |
180 | .000003 | |
181 | .000003 | |
182 | .000003 | |
183 | .000003 | |
184 | .000003 | |
185 | .000003 | |
186 | .000002 | |
187 | .000002 | |
188 | .000002 | |
189 | .000002 | |
190 | .000001 | |
191 | .000001 | |
192 | .000000 | |
193 | .000000 |
See also
- Comprehensive National Power
- Power in international relations
References
- "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 12, 2011. Retrieved December 4, 2009.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- Garrett Heckman. "POWER CAPABILITIES AND SIMILARITY OF INTERESTS: A TEST OF THE POWER TRANSITION THEORY" (PDF). Etd.lsu.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-07-18. Retrieved 2016-04-28.
- "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 26, 2011. Retrieved December 4, 2009.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on July 20, 2011. Retrieved December 7, 2010.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- Singer, J. David, Stuart Bremer, and John Stuckey. (1972). "Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820-1965." in Bruce Russett (ed) Peace, War, and Numbers, Beverly Hills: Sage, 19-48.
Reference works
- Singer, Joel David: The Correlates of War. Testing some Realpolitik Models. New York: The Free Press, 1980.