Racism in the UK Conservative Party

Racism is alleged to have existed in the Conservative Party since at least 1964. Conservative shadow defence minister Enoch Powell's "Rivers of Blood" speech in 1968 was both influential and widely regarded as anti-immigrant with racist overtones, with the party's leadership condemning it, although some Conservative MPs defended Powell's speech. Since then, accusations have been made about several leading members of the party and its policies; these have related to prejudice against non-white people.

See also: Islamophobia in the UK Conservative Party, Antisemitism in the UK Conservative Party, and Racism in the United Kingdom
Part of a series on
Discrimination
Specific forms
 
Social

History: 1960s–70s

1964 general election
Main article: Smethwick in the 1964 general election

In the constituency of Smethwick during the 1964 general election, supporters of Conservative candidate Peter Griffiths were reported to have used the slogan "if you want a nigger for a neighbour, vote Labour".[1] The Conservatives always denied the slogan was theirs, saying it was the work of far-right activists;[2] neo-Nazi British Movement leader Colin Jordan later claimed responsibility for originating the slogan.[3] However, during the campaign, Griffiths did not condemn the phrase and was quoted in The Times as saying, "I should think that is a manifestation of popular feeling. I would not condemn anyone who said that",[4] adding that the quote represented "exasperation, not fascism".[5][6]

In 1964, a delegation of white residents of one Smethwick street successfully petitioned the Conservative council to compulsorily buy vacant houses to prevent people of colour from buying them. Richard Crossman, Labour housing minister, prevented this from happening by refusing to allow the council to borrow money to enact their policy.[7]

Griffiths was a personal supporter of segregation and wanted Smethwick to become "more like apartheid South Africa".[7] In his 1996 book, A Question of Colour?, he wrote, "Apartheid, if it could be separated from racialism, could well be an alternative to integration".[7]

Tim Stanley of The Telegraph notes that while "there were pockets of racism on the Left as well as the Right ... there's no denying that the Tory fringes became a bastion of ugliness that the present-day party is still trying to distance itself from".[6] He goes on to argue that this campaign had two legacies — initially, the degradation of race relations in the UK, which consequently "poisoned the debate over immigration" in the UK by "drag[ging] politics into the gutter".[6]

Enoch Powell, "Rivers of Blood"
Main article: Rivers of Blood speech
Enoch Powell

The racialised debate and discourse over immigration in British politics are said to have become popularised by Conservative MP Enoch Powell's "Rivers of Blood" speech in April 1968, and the clamping down on postwar "new Commonwealth" non-white immigration while allowing concessions to the white-majority "old Commonwealth" (i.e. Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Canada).[8] Reactions to the 1968 Race Relations Bill, which Powell's speech was aimed against, were considered "a turning point from biological racist discourses to cultural racist discourses", with Powell being the chief articulator of this "new racism" in British politics.[9]

When asked whether he was "a racialist" by journalist David Frost, Powell said:

[I]f, by being a racialist, you mean be conscious of differences between men and nations, some of which coincide with differences in race, then we're all racialist ... But if, by a racialist, you mean a man who despises a human being because he belongs to another race, or a man who believes that one race is inherently superior to another in civilisation or capability of civilisation, then the answer is emphatically no ... I do not talk about black and white.[9]

However, it was seen as a racist speech by many commentators, both at the time and today. The Times said in April 1968, following the speech:

The language, the innuendoes, the constant appeals to self-pity, the anecdotes, all combine to make a deliberate appeal to racial prejudice. This is the first time a serious British politician has appealed to racial hatred, in this direct way, in our postwar history. It occurred within a couple of weeks of the murder of Martin Luther King and the burning in many American cities. It is almost unbelievable that any man should be so irresponsible as to promote hatred in the face of these examples of the results that can follow.[10]

Edward Heath also said in 1968 that the speech was "racialist in tone and liable to exacerbate racial tensions",[11] and The Times went on to record incidents of racial attacks in the immediate aftermath of Powell's speech.[12] Despite this condemnation, according to most accounts, the speech was actually popular among a majority of the white British population at the time. The popularity of Powell's perspective on immigration may even have played a decisive factor in the Conservatives' victory in the 1970 general election.[13][14]

An opinion poll commissioned by the BBC television programme Panorama in December 1968 found that eight percent of immigrants believed they had been treated worse by white people since Powell's speech.[15] Subsequent researchers have blamed the speech for leading to a rise in "Paki-bashing", i.e. violent attacks against British Pakistanis and other British Asians, which were unleashed shortly after the inflammatory speech. These attacks peaked during the 1970s–1980s.[16] However, there is "little agreement on the extent to which Powell was responsible for racial attacks", although Hillman notes that in his speech, Powell "foreshadowed this debate by declaring that 'people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles'."[17] Powell however consistently refused to accept any blame for racial violence which occurred after his speech.[18]

Some leading Conservatives in the Shadow Cabinet were outraged by the speech. Iain Macleod, Edward Boyle, Quintin Hogg and Robert Carr all threatened to resign from the front bench unless Powell was sacked.[19] Labour MP Tony Benn also criticised Powell, likening the speech to "the flag of racialism" which "fluttered 25 years ago over Dachau and Belsen".[20] Consequently, Heath sacked Powell from his post as Shadow Defence Secretary. Some Conservative MPs on the right such as Duncan Sandys, Gerald Nabarro and Teddy Taylor spoke out against his sacking and defended Powell's comments.[21]

Powell later told a 1998 BBC Documentary that "racism is the basis of nationality".[22] Later, Stuart Hall[23] and Paul Foot both claimed that Powell was a racist, with Foot likening Powell's comments to the far-right arguments put forth by the British National Party and National Socialist Movement organisations of the 1960s.[24][25] Margaret Thatcher denied that Powell was a racist, saying that the "Rivers of Blood" speech had been misquoted in the press.[26] Simon Heffer[27] and Patrick Cosgrave both absolve Powell of racial prejudice, with Cosgrave insisting that Powell was talking in terms of identity, not race.[28]

The Conservative government acknowledged that the 1971 Immigration Act would be seen as disproportionately benefiting "the 'white' Commonwealth", but Home secretary Reginald Maudling defended the partiality clause, saying it "recognized the family connection with the British diaspora abroad and was not a racial concept".[29]

1980s–1990s

Margaret Thatcher

In 1978, while still leader of the opposition, Thatcher told ITV's World In Action that "People [in Britain] are rather afraid that this country might be swamped by people with a different culture", which was seen as politicising the issue of race in UK politics.[30] In 2014, the then Defence Secretary Michael Fallon apologised for saying that British towns were being "swamped" and "under siege [with] large numbers of migrant workers and people claiming benefits"; these comments were likened by freelance writer Stuart Jeffries in The Guardian, to Thatcher and Enoch Powell's rhetoric.[31] Matthew Parris argues that, as a clerk handling Thatcher's general correspondence at the time, he received 5,000 letters reacting to the interview, almost all of them positive.[32] Fraser Nelson argued that Thatcher's speech was necessary to combat the rise of the National Front by using "plain-speaking" rhetoric to attract their voters.[33] Parris also argues that Thatcher regretted the tone of her speech in later years.[32]

Race riots occurred in Thatcher's Britain, such as those in St. Paul's (1980), Brixton and Toxteth (1981) and Tottenham (1985), which brought heightened political saliency to the 'race issue' in British politics.[34] It is commonly assumed that the Conservative Party under Thatcher had adopted a strong assimilationist stance and was hostile to the concept of multiculturalism.[34]

Apartheid

Former Conservative PM Margaret Thatcher was warned by her Foreign Secretary, Geoffrey Howe, that she would be seen as a "friend of apartheid" due to her government's refusal to impose sanctions on apartheid South Africa in the run-up to the 1986 Commonwealth Games. They were boycotted by 32 of the 59 eligible countries due to Britain's refusal to sever sporting ties with South Africa.[35] In his memoirs, he commented that "Margaret would quite rightly denounce the violence of ANC terrorism, but without ever acknowledging, even by the tone of voice, that the whole white-controlled repressive structure of the apartheid legal system was bound itself to provoke inter-racial conflict".[36]

Thatcher also refused Howe's pleas to make a speech in the House of Commons condemning apartheid.[35] Patrick Wright, former head of the Diplomatic Service, alleged that Thatcher wanted "a whites-only South Africa".[37] Conservative MP Terry Dicks described Mandela as a "black terrorist"; at the same time, the Federation of Conservative Students had conferences "littered" with "Hang Nelson Mandela" posters, and Conservative MP Teddy Taylor argued that "Mandela should be shot".[38]

Thatcher opposed sanctions imposed on South Africa by the Commonwealth and the European Economic Community (EEC).[39] She attempted to preserve trade with South Africa while persuading the government there to abandon apartheid. This included "[c]asting herself as President Botha's candid friend", and inviting him to visit the UK in 1984,[40] in spite of the "inevitable demonstrations" against his government.[41] Notes by Botha's foreign minister written on his 1984 trip to the UK claim that Thatcher told him that "apartheid had to be dismantled, Mandela and other prisoners released" as well as stopping the "forcible removal of urban blacks".[42]

Alan Merrydew of the Canadian broadcaster BCTV News asked Thatcher what her response was "to a reported ANC statement that they will target British firms in South Africa?" She replied, "when the ANC says that they will target British companies. This shows what a typical terrorist organisation it is. I fought terrorism all my life and if more people fought it, and we were all more successful, we should not have it and I hope that everyone in this hall will think it is right to go on fighting terrorism."[43]

Anti-apartheid activists saw Thatcher's comments as making excuses for the apartheid government while "placing the blame for government repression firmly on the side of the anti-government opposition"; however, Thatcher later acknowledged to a Conservative backbencher that:

The exclusion of blacks from the political process has inevitably led to increasing dissatisfaction. Although not to be condoned, this has been a powerful factor in impelling black political leaders to seek by violence what is denies them by the laws under which they live. The institutionalised discrimination and second-class status accorded to blacks in South Africa ... continues to be an affront to the rest of Africa and to those of us who live in a free society and uphold its values.[44]

During his visit to Britain five months after his release from prison, Nelson Mandela praised Thatcher: "She is an enemy of apartheid ... We have much to thank her for",[40] but noted that they were in disagreement on how to end the practise.[42]

Anti-apartheid activist Reverend Desmond Tutu was highly critical of the attitude of the Conservative Party and Thatcher towards apartheid. In the 1980s, he also condemned Western political leaders, including Thatcher, for retaining links with the South African government, stipulating that "support of this racist policy is racist".[45] He and his wife boycotted a lecture given at the Federal Theological Institute by former British Prime Minister Alec Douglas-Home in the 1960s; Tutu noted that they did so because the Conservative Party had "behaved abominably over issues which touched our hearts most nearly".[46]

In 1989, future Prime Minister David Cameron went on a "sanctions-busting jolly" to South Africa with the anti-sanctions Conservative Research Department, for which he was criticised by veteran anti-apartheid campaigner and Labour MP Peter Hain.[47]

John Major ministry

Major's ministry was marked to a greater effort to acknowledge Britain's cultural and ethnic diversity yet continue with a "dual interventionist strategy" of combining immigration controls with anti-discriminatory measures. Major's attempts to reconcile attitudes towards immigration within the party were sometimes opposed by the party's grassroots.[34]

In December 1990, the Cheltenham Conservative Association tried to deselect John Taylor after he was selected by Central Office to become the Conservative candidate for Cheltenham in the 1992 general election.[48] The campaign was seen as having been influenced by racism,[49] with Taylor's Caribbean background reportedly causing concern to some members of the local Conservative constituency association.[50] Bill Galbraith, an opponent of Taylor's candidacy, said that the Conservative Central Office should not have "foisted" a "bloody nigger" upon the people of Cheltenham.[51] Central Office expelled Gailbraith over the issue.[34] Taylor's inability to win such a safe seat for the Tories has "often been attributed to the alleged racial prejudice of the local electorate and to the ambivalence, to say the least, of the local Conservative association".[34]

Labour accused the Conservative Party of "playing the race card" in the 1991 Langbaurgh by-election, by needlessly emphasising the race and place of birth (Haridwar, Uttar Pradesh, India) of the local candidate, Ashok Kumar. The then Deputy Leader of the Labour Party Roy Hattersley called the campaign on race "the dirtiest campaign I have known since the Tories did very similar things in Smethwick, 27 years ago".[34]

In 1994, African American civil rights minister Jesse Jackson garnered controversy by seemingly comparing the Conservative Party's policies to racism, fascism and apartheid, saying: "We must no longer allow the clock to be turned back on human rights or put up with political systems which are content to maintain the status quo. In South Africa the status quo was called racism. We rebelled against it. In Germany it was called fascism. Now in Britain and the US, it is called conservatism".[52] Jackson's comments were condemned by Conservative MP Peter Bottomley as "stereotypical ignorance".[52]

Tories in opposition: 1997–2010

In 2001 Edgar Griffin, father of Nick Griffin, was sacked from the party due to his support for his son's far-right British National Party. Griffin claimed to have rank and file Tory support for his views, which included financial subsidies for "the coloured folk" to leave the UK.[53] This, combined with Conservative MP John Townend's claim that immigrants were "undermin[ing]" the purity of Britain's "homogeneous Anglo-Saxon society" and were causing a rise in crime rates across the UK[54] led Conservative MP Andrew Lansley to say that there was "endemic racism in the Tory party".[55][56]

2010–present

Accusations against Boris Johnson

As editor of The Spectator, Boris Johnson was strongly criticised for allowing columnist Taki Theodoracopulos to publish racist and antisemitic language in the magazine,[57][58]

In 2002, Johnson described black people in The Telegraph as "piccaninnies" with "watermelon smiles".[59] No disciplinary action was taken by the party.[56] His 2006 comparison between the frequently changing leadership of the Conservatives to cannibalism in Papua New Guinea drew criticism from the country's high commission.[60] In April 2016, in an article for The Sun, in response to a false accusation that Barack Obama had removed a bust of Winston Churchill from the Oval Office following Obama's inauguration,[61] Johnson wrote that Obama was motivated by "the part-Kenyan president's ancestral dislike of the British Empire – of which Churchill had been such a fervent defender".[62] The comments were described as "deeply offensive" by Churchill's grandson, Conservative MP Sir Nicholas Soames, who called the article "deplorable" and "completely idiotic".[63] The Conservative party did not hold an investigation or take any disciplinary action.[56] Obama called Johnson the British version of Donald Trump following the article, and was "taken aback" by the perceived racial connotations of Johnson's remarks.[62]

May and Rudd: "Hostile environment" and Windrush
Main articles: Home Office hostile environment policy and Windrush scandal

The use of "Go Home" vans to deter illegal immigration to the UK was criticised as dog-whistle racism by Labour's Diane Abbott,[64] as well as impractical. The Observer wrote that, "The government's hostile-environment policy, in which private citizens such as landlords are obliged to check people's papers, increases discrimination against people with foreign names and is ineffective at reducing illegal immigration. Yet it has pursued this policy to win support from voters it fears might otherwise back the far right."[65]

Amber Rudd was the Home Secretary following Theresa May, and served under May's premiership as Prime Minister. Although Rudd was seen as having a more relaxed attitude towards race and immigration,[66] her 2016 conference speech was criticised by the leader of the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, as fanning "the flames of xenophobia and hatred" by forcing firms to declare the percentage of foreign workers they employ.[67][68] LBC radio host James O'Brien likened the speech to Chapter 2 of Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf;[68] this analogy was criticised by Ed West in The Spectator.[69]

As part of the "hostile environment" policy, many citizens of the Windrush generation — some who had lived in Britain for more than half a century — were wrongly deported in what became known as the "Windrush scandal".

Rudd, May and Conservative Party chairman Brandon Lewis were accused by some, such as Hugh Muir and Hannah Jane Parkinson in The Guardian, of institutional racism by defending a policy which disproportionately affected black Britons.[70][71] British Afro-Caribbean academic Kehinde Andrews wrote for CNN: "Public and political pressure has forced Prime Minster [sic] Theresa May to apologize. But it was her Conservative Party's policies that created the scandal in the first place", adding that "The treatment of the Windrush generation is appalling, but unfortunately not surprising. Racism is as British as a cup of tea."[72] Parkinson also accused the government of racist hypocrisy, in that it was forcing the Windrush generation of British nationals to prove their identity to stay in the UK, while lessening restrictions on foreign oligarchs.[71]

In April 2018, it was revealed that the Home Office had come up with targets for removing illegal immigrants from the UK, a policy of which Home Secretary Rudd denied all knowledge, despite writing in a private letter to May of an "ambitious but deliverable" target for an increase in the enforced deportation of immigrants.[73][74] The Shadow Home Secretary, Diane Abbott, said that "immigration officials may have been looking for soft targets in the shape of West Indian pensioners who don't have hot shot lawyers", and the Shadow Minister for Diverse Communities, Dawn Butler, accused Theresa May of "presiding over a government that has policies that are institutionally racist".[75] Rudd resigned on 30 April 2018 in the aftermath of the scandal, saying that she had "inadvertently misled" MPs over targets for removing illegal immigrants.[75]

Support for Viktor Orbán

In September 2018, as member of ACRE, Conservative MEPs supported the right-wing populist Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orbán, against a motion to censure him in the European Parliament. Conservative sources told The Independent that the opposition to the vote was in order to gain "brownie points" from Orbán's administration in order to make him more amenable to a post-Brexit trade deal. The Conservatives were the only governing conservative party in western Europe to vote against the censure.[76]

The Board of Deputies of British Jews accused the Conservative government of defending Hungary's "appalling track record" of "vivid antisemitism", saying: "we are very alarmed by the messages at the heart of Orbán's election campaign, including his comments about 'Muslim invaders', calling migrants poison, and the vivid antisemitism in the relentless campaign against Jewish philanthropist George Soros."[76] Only one Conservative MEP voted in favour of the motion (Baroness Mobarik), with two abstentions (Charles Tannock and Sajjad Karim).[76] The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) said that the Conservative Party was giving "bigotry a free pass" and viewing the rights of minorities, including Muslims, Jews and immigrants as "expendable as support is sought for the government's Brexit position".[76]

Accusations against Nadine Dorries

In February 2019, Nadine Dorries referred to Ash Sarkar as prospective Labour Party MP Faiza Shaheen, an action which was subsequently criticised by Sayeeda Warsi and others.[77][78][79] It emerged that Dorries had previously made allegedly racist remarks about Chuka Umunna in 2013, and Yasmin Alibhai-Brown and Sadiq Khan in 2018.[77][80][81][79]

gollark: Testbot1, take 3 🐝.
gollark: Testbot1, take 3 🐝.
gollark: Aha.
gollark: There appear to be regexuous forms for which JS is to be blamed.
gollark: Testbot1, take 3 🐝.

See also

Notes
  1. Edwards 2008.
  2. Arnot 1993.
  3. Jackson 2016, p. 129.
  4. Bleich 2003, p. 48.
  5. Times correspondent 1964.
  6. Stanley 2013.
  7. Jeffries 2014a.
  8. Travis 2002.
  9. Grosfoguel 2003, p. 209.
  10. Editorial 1968.
  11. Press release 1968.
  12. Times correspondent 1968.
  13. McLean 2001, pp. 129–30.
  14. Heffer 1999, p. 568.
  15. Heffer 1999, p. 500.
  16. Ashe, Virdee & Brown 2016.
  17. Hillman 2008, p. 89.
  18. Smithies & Fiddick 1969.
  19. Heppell 2012, p. 86.
  20. Butler & Pinto-Duschinsky 1971, pp. 159–160.
  21. Heffer 1999, p. 461.
  22. Cockerell 1995.
  23. Hall 1998.
  24. Foot 1969, pp. 114–5.
  25. Foot 1998, p. 12.
  26. Thatcher 1995, p. 146.
  27. Heffer 1998, p. 450.
  28. Cosgrave 1989, p. 254.
  29. Cerna, Lucie (2014). Migration Policymaking in Europe: The Dynamics of Actors and Contexts in Past and Present. Amsterdam University Press. p. 197. ISBN 978-9089643704.
  30. Lynch 1999, p. 51.
  31. Jeffries 2014b.
  32. Parris 2014.
  33. Nelson 2014.
  34. Latour 2009.
  35. Milmo 2016.
  36. Williams 2015, p. 57.
  37. Khan 2018.
  38. Bevins 1996.
  39. Campbell 2011, p. 322.
  40. Hanning 2013.
  41. Campbell 2011, p. 325.
  42. Renwick 2015.
  43. Plaut 2018.
  44. Williams 2015, pp. 57–9.
  45. Allen 2006, p. 257.
  46. Du Boulay 1988, p. 77; Allen 2006, p. 105.
  47. Dejevsky 2009.
  48. Gammell & Beckford 2014.
  49. Green 2014.
  50. BBC 2001.
  51. Rule 1990, p. 3.
  52. Los Angeles Times 1994.
  53. Chrisafis 2001.
  54. Sparrow 2001.
  55. Sylvester & Johnston 2001.
  56. Unite the Union 2016.
  57. Purnell 2011, p. 193.
  58. Byrnes 2003.
  59. Bowcott & Jones 2008.
  60. Gimson 2012, p. 266.
  61. M. Chalabi, 'Fact-check: did Obama really remove a Churchill bust from the Oval Office?' (22/04/16) on The Guardian
  62. Borger 2018.
  63. BBC 2016.
  64. Taylor, Gidda & Syal 2013.
  65. Observer editorial 2018.
  66. Walsche 2018.
  67. Cowburn 2016.
  68. Cockburn 2016.
  69. West 2016.
  70. Muir 2018.
  71. Parkinson 2018.
  72. Andrews 2018.
  73. Grierson 2018.
  74. Stewart, Heather (29 April 2018). "Amber Rudd resigns hours after Guardian publishes deportation targets letter". The Guardian. Retrieved 29 June 2018.
  75. BBC 2018.
  76. Watts 2018.
  77. "Tory MP Nadine Dorries confuses BBC pundit with 'other brown woman' Labour candidate". The Independent. 4 February 2019. Retrieved on 17 February 2019.
  78. "Tory MP Nadine Dorries accused of thinking 'brown women look the same'". Evening Standard. 4 February 2019. Retrieved on 17 February 2019.
  79. "MP gets two Asian women confused on Twitter". 4 February 2019. Retrieved on 17 February 2019 – via www.bbc.co.uk.
  80. "Labour accuses Michael Gove and Nadine Dorries of racism over royal wedding comments". The Independent. 22 May 2018. Retrieved on 17 February 2019.
  81. "Who Does Nadine Dorries Think Chuka Umanna Looks Like?". HuffPost UK. 9 April 2013. Retrieved on 17 February 2019.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.