List of countries by sector composition of the labor force
This is a List of countries by sector composition of the labor force mostly based on The World Factbook .
Rank | Country/Region | Labour force | Date of information | Agriculture | Industry | Service | Date of information | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
— | World | 3,432,200,000 | 2017 est. | 31% | 23.5% | 45.5% | 2014 est. | |
1 | 816,200,000 | 2018 est. | 26.1% | 27.6% | 46.3% | 2018 est. | ||
2 | 520,200,000 | 2011 est. | 47% | 22% | 31% | 2009 est. | ||
— | 228,400,000 | 2011 est. | 4.7% | 28.7% | 66.6% | 2010 est. | ||
3 | 153,400,000 | 2011 est. | 0.7% | 20.3% | 79.1% | 2009 | ||
4 | 117,000,000 | 2011 est. | 38.3% | 12.8% | 48.9% | 2010 est. | ||
5 | 104,300,000 | 2011 est. | 9.4% | 32.1% | 58.5% | 2017 est. | ||
6 | 75,420,000 | 2011 est. | 45% | 30% | 25% | 2008 | ||
7 | 75,410,000 | 2011 est. | 9.8% | 27.5% | 62.7% | 2010 | ||
8 | 62,740,000 | 2011 est. | 3.9% | 26.2% | 69.8% | 2010 est. | ||
9 | 57,890,000 | 2011 est. | 43% | 20.3% | 36.6% | 2005 est. | ||
10 | 51,530,000 | 2011 est. | 70% | 10% | 20% | 1999 est. | ||
11 | 48,230,000 | 2011 est. | 53.9% | 20.3% | 25.8% | 2009 | ||
12 | 47,770,000 | 2011 est. | 13.7% | 23.4% | 62.9% | 2005 | ||
13 | 43,590,000 | 2011 est. | 2.4% | 29.7% | 67.8% | 2005 | ||
14 | 39,810,000 | 2011 est. | 33% | 15% | 52% | 2010 est. | ||
15 | 39,280,000 | 2007 | 42.4% | 19.7% | 37.9% | 2008 est. | ||
16 | 37,900,000 | 2011 est. | 85% | 5% | 10% | 2009 est. | ||
17 | 31,760,000 | 2011 est. | 1.4% | 18.2% | 80.4% | 2006 est. | ||
18 | 32,530,000 | 2011 est. | 70% | 7% | 23% | 2001 | ||
19 | 29,560,000 | 2011 est. | 3.8% | 24.3% | 71.8% | 2005 | ||
20 | 27,740,000 | 2011 est. | 32% | 17% | 51% | 2001 est. | ||
21 | 26,460,000 | 2011 est. | 25.5% | 26.2% | 48.4% | 2010 | ||
22 | 26,370,000 | 2011 est. | 25% | 31% | 45% | June 2007 | ||
23 | 25,000,000 | 2011 est. | 4.2% | 30.7% | 65.1% | 2005 | ||
24 | 25,090,000 | 2011 est. | 7% | 23.6% | 69.4% | 2011 est. | ||
25 | 34,790,000 | 2007 est. | N/A | N/A | N/A | - | ||
26 | 23,130,000 | 2011 est. | 4.2% | 24% | 71.7% | 2009 est. | ||
27 | 24,060,000 | 2011 est. | 80% | 20% | 20% | 2002 est. | ||
28 | 22,090,000 | 2011 est. | 15.8% | 18.5% | 65.7% | 2008 | ||
29 | 22,500,000 | 2011 est. | 18% | 13% | 68% | 2010 est. | ||
30 | 12,200,000 | 2011 est. | 35% | 65% | 65% | 2008 | ||
31 | 18,680,000 | 2011 est. | 2% | 15% | 83% | 2006 est. | ||
32 | 18,000,000 | 2009 est. | 75% | 7% | 18% | 2010 est. | ||
33 | 18,390,000 | 2011 est. | 75% | 65% | 65% | 2008 est. | ||
34 | 17,670,000 | 2011 est. | 9% | 26% | 65% | 2007 est. | ||
35 | 17,930,000 | 2011 est. | 17.4% | 29.2% | 53.4% | 2005 | ||
36 | 16,760,000 | 2011 est. | 5% | 23% | 72% | 2009 est. | ||
37 | 16,280,000 | 2011 est. | 44% | 20% | 36% | 1995 | ||
38 | 16,020,000 | 2011 est. | 82% | 5% | 13% | 1999 est. | ||
39 | 15,000,000 | 2004 est. | 78.6% | 5.7% | 15.7% | FY08/09 est. | ||
40 | 13,440,000 | 2011 est. | 13% | 23% | 64% | 1997 est. | ||
41 | 11,920,000 | 2007 est. | 80% | 7% | 13% | 1998 est. | ||
42 | 11,600,000 | 2011 est. | 44.6% | 19.8% | 35.5% | 2006 est. | ||
43 | 12,020,000 | 2011 est. | 3.6% | 21.1% | 75% | 2009 est. | ||
44 | 11,900,000 | 2011 est. | 13% | 36% | 51% | 2005 est. | ||
45 | 11,160,000 | 2011 est. | 5.2% | 35.9% | 58.8% | 2010 est. | ||
46 | 10,770,000 | 2011 est. | 56% | 15% | 29% | 2005 est. | ||
47 | 10,800,000 | 2011 est. | 0.7% | 23.8% | 75.5% | 2005 | ||
48 | 9,973,000 | 2011 est. | 81% | 6% | 13% | 1997 est. | ||
49 | 11,130,000 | 2011 est. | 14% | 13.4% | 72.6% | 2003 est. | ||
50 | 9,504,000 | 2007 | - | - | - | - | ||
51 | 9,252,000 | 2011 est. | 29.7% | 23.2% | 47.1% | 2006 | ||
52 | 8,733,000 | 2011 est. | 28.2% | 18.2% | 53.6% | 2010 | ||
53 | 8,800,000 | 2010 est. | 57.6% | 15.9% | 26.5% | 2009 est. | ||
54 | 7,785,000 | 2011 est. | 2% | 18% | 80% | 2005 est. | ||
55 | 8,900,000 | 2010 est. | 21.6% | 18.7% | 59.8% | 2008 est. | ||
56 | 8,100,000 | 2009 est. | 32.7% | 24.2% | 43.1% | December 2010 est. | ||
57 | 8,240,000 | 2011 est. | 85% | 15% | 15% | 2003 est. | ||
58 | 7,463,000 | 2009 est. | 68% | N/A | N/A | 2007 est. | ||
59 | 8,047,000 | 2011 est. | 13.2% | 23% | 63.9% | 2005 | ||
60 | 8,094,000 | 2011 est. | 70% | 13% | 17% | 2001 est. | ||
61 | 7,630,000 | 2011 est. | 6.7% | 21.4% | 71.9% | 2005 est. | ||
62 | 6,668,000 | 2007 | 90% | industry & services 10% | 10% | 2000 | ||
63 | 7,030,000 | 2011 est. | - | - | - | - | ||
64 | 5,640,000 | 2011 est. | 17% | 16% | 67% | 2008 est. | ||
65 | 5,747,000 | 2007 est. | 90% | industry & services 10% | 10% | 2003 est. | ||
66 | 5,528,000 | 2011 est. | 11.7% | 28.5% | 59.8% | (2009 est. | ||
67 | 5,681,000 | 2011 est. | 77.5% | industry & services 22.5% | 22.5% | 2007 est. | ||
68 | 5,570,000 | 2011 est. | 85% | 6% | 9% | 2004 | ||
69 | 5,545,000 | 2011 est. | 3.1% | 38.6% | 58.3% | 2009 | ||
70 | 5,071,000 | 2011 est. | 2% | 25% | 73% | 2007 est. | ||
71 | 4,972,000 | 2011 est. | 12.4% | 22.4% | 65.1% | 2005 est. | ||
72 | 5,153,000 | 2011 est. | 20% | 19.4% | 60.6% | 2005 | ||
73 | 5,011,000 | 2011 est. | 1.1% | 28.2% | 70.7% | 2008 est. | ||
74 | 5,000,000 | 2009 | 14% | 34.7% | 51.3% | 2003 est. | ||
75 | 4,673,000 | 2011 est. | 8.3% | 21.2% | 70.4% | 2005 | ||
76 | 4,688,000 | 2007 | 90% | 6% | 4% | 1995 | ||
77 | 4,697,000 | 2011 est. | 40% | 17% | 43% | 2006 est. | ||
78 | 4,446,000 | 2007 | 90% | industry & services 10% | 10% | 2000 | ||
79 | 4,732,000 | 2011 est. | 14.6% | 22.3% | 63.1% | 2005 | ||
80 | 4,392,000 | 2007 est. | 76% | industry & services 24% | 24% | 2006 est. | ||
81 | 6,119,000 | 2011 est. | 38.3% | 12.1% | 49.6% | 2008 | ||
82 | 4,293,000 | 2007 | 80% | industry & services 20% | 20% | 2006 est. | ||
83 | 4,245,000 | 2007 | 93.6% | 2.3% | 4.1% | 2002 est. | ||
84 | 4,238,000 | 2011 est. | 4.7% | 30.9% | 64.4% | 2010 | ||
85 | 4,249,000 | 2011 est. | 50% | 15% | 35% | 1999 est. | ||
86 | 4,270,000 | 2011 est. | 3.4% | 23.4% | 73.2% | 2010 | ||
87 | 3,856,000 | 2011 est | 66% | 10% | 24% | 1996 | ||
88 | 3,904,000 | 2011 est. | 25.5% | 26.2% | 48.4% | 2010 | ||
89 | 3,896,000 | 2011 est. | 85% | N/A | N/A | 2005 est | ||
90 | 3,663,000 | 2011 est. | 5.5% | 27.5% | 67% | 2009 est. | ||
91 | 3,701,000 | 2011 est. | N/A | 4.7% | 95.3% | 2010 est. | ||
92 | 3,662,000 | 2007 est. | - | - | - | - | ||
93 | 4,810,000 | 2010 | 38.1% | 11.5% | 50.4% | 2010 | ||
94 | 3,447,000 | 2007 | 71% | industry & services 29% | 29% | 1975 | ||
95 | 3,241,000 | 2007 est. | 80% | industry & services 20% | 20% | 2005 est. | ||
96 | 2,533,000 | 2011 est. | 7.1% | 35.2% | 57.7% | 2009 | ||
97 | 4,111,000 | 2011 est. | 7% | 15% | 78% | 2000 est. | ||
98 | 3,463,000 | 2011 est. | 39.2% | 20.9% | 39.8% | 2005 est. | ||
99 | 3,212,000 | 2011 est. | 0.1% | 30.2% | 69.7% | 2010 | ||
100 | 3,227,000 | 2011 est. | 2% | 16% | 82% | September 2008 | ||
101 | 3,085,000 | 2011 est. | 26.5% | 18.5% | 55% | 2008 | ||
102 | 3,350,000 | 2011 est. | 23.9% | 20.5% | 55.6% | October 2009 | ||
103 | 2,577,000 | 2011 est. | 19% | 23% | 58% | 2006 est. | ||
104 | 2,857,000 | 2011 est. | 2.5% | 20.2% | 77.3% | 2005 est. | ||
105 | 2,344,000 | 2007 | 48% | 12.5% | 39.5% | 2005 est. | ||
106 | 2,617,000 | 2011 est. | 2.9% | 21.1% | 76% | 2008 | ||
107 | 2,676,000 | 2011 | 4.9% | 16.7% | 78.4% | 2009 | ||
108 | 2,885,000 | 2011 est. | 28% | 19% | 53% | 2010 est. | ||
109 | 2,112,000 | 2011 est. | 5% | 20% | 76% | 2010 est. | ||
110 | 2,353,000 | 2011 est. | 7% | 19% | 74% | 2006 est. | ||
111 | 2,713,000 | 2011 est. | 3.5% | 27% | 69.4% | December 2009 | ||
112 | 2,243,000 | 2011 est. | N/A | N/A | N/A | - | ||
113 | 3,690,000 | 2010 est. | 75.1% | N/A | N/A | 2010 est. | ||
114 | 2,100,000 | 2008 | 49.8% | 12.8% | 37.4% | 2009 est. | ||
115 | 2,100,000 | 2009 est. | 48.2% | 14% | 37.8% | 2004 est. | ||
116 | 1,918,000 | 2007 est. | 55.6% | 8.9% | 35.5% | 2006 est. | ||
117 | 2,093,000 | 2011 est. | 14% | 22% | 64% | 2006 est. | ||
118 | 1,160,000 | 2011 est. | 17% | 23% | 59% | 2004 est. | ||
119 | 1,926,000 | 2007 | - | - | - | - | ||
120 | 1,721,000 | 2011 | 5% | 31.3% | 63.6% | 2008 | ||
121 | 1,639,000 | 2011 est. | 13% | 14% | 73% | 2010 est. | ||
122 | 1,771,000 | 2011 est. | 2.7% | 20% | 77.4% | 2007 est. | ||
123 | 1,618,000 | 2011 est. | 14% | 29.1% | 56.9% | 2005 | ||
124 | 1,525,000 | 2011 est. | 17.6% | 8.8% | 73.6% | 2009 est. | ||
125 | 2,207,000 | 2007 est. | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
126 | 1,244,000 | 2011 est. | 40.6% | 16% | 43.3% | 2005 | ||
127 | 2,595,000 | 2007 | 65% | 5% | 30% | 1998 est. | ||
128 | 1,479,000 | 2007 | 2.1% | 19% | 79% | 2005 | ||
129 | 1,324,000 | 2011 est. | 17% | 19% | 64% | 2006 | ||
130 | 1,481,000 | 2007 est. | 46.2% | 15.6% | 38.2% | 2006 est. | ||
131 | 1,074,000 | 2016 | 18.0% | 31.3% | 50.8% | 2016 | ||
132 | 1,169,000 | 2011 est. | 12.1% | 25.8% | 61.8% | 2005 est. | ||
133 | 1,320,000 | 2011 est. | - | - | - | - | ||
134 | 1,481,000 | 2007 est. | N/A | N/A | N/A | - | ||
135 | 1,053,000 | 2010 est. | 47.8% | 23% | 29.2% | September 2010 est. | ||
136 | 1,068,000 | 2008 | 34% | 5% | 61% | 2008 | ||
137 | 968,800 | 2007 est. | N/A | N/A | N/A | - | ||
138 | 938,700 | 2011 est. | 2.2% | 35% | 62.8% | 2009 | ||
139 | 938,000 | 2011 est. | 19.9% | 22.1% | 58% | September 2010 | ||
140 | 938,000 | 2007 est. | 86% | industry & services 14% | 14% | 2002 est. | ||
141 | 1,318,000 | 2007 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 2001 est. | ||
142 | 685,400 | 2011 est. | 2.8% | 22.7% | 74.5% | 2008 | ||
143 | 803,700 | 2011 est. | 16.3% | 22.4% | 61.3% | 2008 est. | ||
144 | 636,800 | 2011 est. | 3.8% | 12.8% | 83.4% | 2007 est. | ||
— | 745,600 | 2011 | 16.1% | 28.4% | 55.5% | 2010 est. | ||
145 | 728,100 | 2011 est. | 60% | 15% | 25% | 2000 est. | ||
146 | 607,400 | 2011 est. | 9% | 30% | 61% | 2007 | ||
147 | 632,700 | 2007 | 82% | industry & services 18% | 18% | 2000 est. | ||
148 | 672,500 | 2011 est | 1% | 79% | 20% | 1997 est. | ||
149 | 333,900 | 2007 est. | N/A | N/A | N/A | - | ||
150 | 411,300 | 2011 est. | 8.5% | 20.5% | 71% | 2006 est. | ||
151 | 777,100 | 2007 | 75% | 19% | 6% | 1996 | ||
— | 330,900 | 2010 est. | - | 4.3% | 95.7% | 2010 | ||
152 | 457,900 | 2007 | 70% | N/A | N/A | - | ||
153 | 1,225,000 | 2009 est. | N/A | N/A | N/A | - | ||
154 | 351,700 | 2007 | N/A | N/A | N/A | - | ||
— | 348,200 | 2010 | 5.1% | 15.6% | 79.3% | 2010 est. | ||
155 | 259,100 | 2004 | 2% | 30% | 68% | 2004 est. | ||
156 | 202,500 | 2007 | 75% | 5% | 20% | 2000 est. | ||
157 | 207,500 | 2011 est. | 2.2% | 17.2% | 80.6% | 2007 est. | ||
158 | 188,800 | 2008 est. | 4.2% | 62.8% | 33% | 2008 est. | ||
159 | 184,000 | 2008 | 5% | 5% | 90% | 2005 est. | ||
160 | 265,200 | 2010 | 1.3% | 24.8% | 73.9% | 2010 | ||
161 | 183,200 | 2011 est. | 4.8% | 22.2% | 73% | 2008 | ||
162 | 165,600 | 2007 | 8% | 14% | 78% | 2004 | ||
163 | 268,500 | 2007 est. | 80% | industry & services 20% | 20% | 1996 est. | ||
164 | 110,000 | 2010 | 11% | 23% | 65% | 2006 est. | ||
165 | 175,000 | 2007 est. | 10% | 15% | 75% | 1996 est. | ||
166 | 196,100 | 2007 | - | - | - | - | ||
167 | 335,000 | 2007 est. | 70% | industry & services 30% | 30% | 2001 est. | ||
— | 116,000 | 2007 | 13% | 19% | 68% | 2002 | ||
168 | 120,500 | 2008 est. | - | - | - | - | ||
169 | 66,270 | 2007 est. | N/A | N/A | N/A | - | ||
— | 83,600 | 2005 | 1% | 15% | 84% | 2007 est. | ||
— | 102,600 | 2007 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 2002 | ||
170 | 115,900 | 2007 | 65% | 5% | 30% | 2000 est. | ||
171 | 82,950 | 2007 est. | 26% | 10% | 64% | 2004 est. | ||
— | 53,560 | June 2006 | - | - | - | - | ||
— | 44,560 | 2002 | - | - | - | - | ||
172 | 49,300 | 2010 est. | - | - | - | - | ||
— | 49,820 | 2007 est. | 1% | 19% | 80% | 2003 est. | ||
173 | 79,700 | 2007 est. | 21.7% | 24.7% | 53.6% | 2002 est. | ||
174 | 42,300 | 1996 | 24% | 14% | 62% | 1999 est. | ||
175 | 38,220 | 2010 | 0.4% | 4.7% | 94.9% | 2010 | ||
176 | 57,520 | 2007 est. | 26% | 17% | 57% | 1980 est. | ||
177 | 41,500 | 2004 est. | N/A | N/A | N/A | - | ||
— | 41,790 | 2006 | 2% | 6% | 92% | 2006 | ||
178 | 39,560 | 2006 | 3% | 23% | 74% | 2006 | ||
— | 38,450 | 2005 est. | N/A | N/A | N/A | - | ||
179 | 38,360 | 2004 | 3% | 17% | 80% | 2004 est. | ||
180 | 35,050 | 1991 | N/A | N/A | N/A | - | ||
181 | 39,960 | 2007 | 65% | 5% | 30% | 1998 est. | ||
182 | 28,240 | January 2009 | 4.9% | 31.9% | 63.2% | 2007 est. | ||
— | 31,470 | March 2006 | - | - | - | - | ||
183 | 31,000 | 31 December 2006 | 1.5% | 43.5% | 55% | December 2006 | ||
184 | 30,000 | 1991 | 7% | 11% | 82% | 1983 | ||
185 | 25,000 | 2000 est. | 40% | 32% | 28% | 2000 est. | ||
— | 34,680 | November 2008 | 10.2% | 20.5% | 69.2% | 2008 | ||
— | 23,450 | 2004 | 1.9% | 19.1% | 79% | 2008 est. | ||
186 | 22,950 | 2008 | 0.2% | 36.3% | 63.5% | June 2010 est. | ||
187 | 18,170 | June 1995 | - | - | - | - | ||
— | 17,630 | June 2010 | 34% | 33% | 33% | 1990 | ||
188 | 16,360 | 2008 | - | - | - | - | ||
189 | 14,680 | 2000 | 21.4% | 20.9% | 57.7% | 2000 | ||
— | 12,770 | 2004 | 0.6% | 40% | 59.4% | 2005 | ||
— | 12,690 | 2001 | N/A | 40% | 60% | 2001 | ||
— | 144,000 | 2010 est. | 50% | industry & services 50% | 50% | 2005 est. | ||
190 | 9,777 | 2005 | 20% | N/A | N/A | 1990 | ||
191 | 7,870 | 2001 est. | 2.7% | 32% | 65.3% | 2000 | ||
— | 6,820 | 2001 | 29% | 15% | 56% | 2006 est. | ||
— | 6,049 | 2001 | 4% | 3% | 92% | 2000 est. | ||
— | 4,848 | 1990 est. | 20% | - | 33% | - | ||
— | 4,521 | 2000 est. | - | - | - | - | ||
192 | 3,615 | 2004 est. | - | - | - | - | ||
— | 3,450 | 2005 | 18% | 41% | 41% | 1996 est. | ||
— | 3,104 | 2003 | 80% | 4% | 16% | 2001 est. | ||
— | 2,486 | 1998 est. | 6% | 48% | 46% | 1987 est. | ||
— | 1,724 | 1996 | 95% | industry & services 5% | 5% | 1996 | ||
193 | 663 | 2001 | - | - | - | - | ||
— | 440 | 2001 | - | - | - | - | ||
— | 15 | 2004 | - | - | - | - |
Notes
gollark: mpd has native HTTP output, but icecast provides better compatibility and some sort of manual buffer control (?) which provides greater audio stability in e.g. the music bot.
gollark: This is, I believe, widely considered the standard for audio streaming servers, although it has some annoying parts.
gollark: Now, mpd feeds into a server called "icecast".
gollark: This is a web client for mpd which allows me to queue new tracks, search things, and that sort of thing, from my "web browser" on my laptop or phone.
gollark: Now, one of those clients for mpd is the creatively named ympd (I forgot what the y stands for).
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.