Leprechaun economics

Leprechaun economics was the 26.3 per cent rise in Irish 2015 GDP, later revised to 34.4 per cent,[lower-alpha 1] in a 12 July 2016 publication by the Irish Central Statistics Office (CSO), restating 2015 Irish national accounts.[5][6][7][8] The term was coined by Nobel Prize–winning economist Paul Krugman to mark the fact that the long-term distortion of Irish economic data by tax-driven accounting flows had reached a climax;[1][2][9] by 2020, Krugman said the term was a feature of all tax havens.[10]

Nobel Prize-winning American economist Paul Krugman, whose response on the 12 July 2016 christened the Irish Leprechaun Economics affair.[1][2]
Leprechaun economics: Apple's Q1 2015 USD 300 billion tax inversion of its non–U.S. business, was the largest ever BEPS action, and double the blocked 2016 USD 160 billion Pfizer–Allergan inversion[3]
Taxation
An aspect of fiscal policy

While the event that caused the artificial Irish GDP growth occurred in Q1 2015, the Irish CSO had to delay its GDP revision, and redact the release of its regular economic data in 2016–2017 to protect the source's identity, as required by Irish law.[11] Only in Q1 2018 could economists confirm Apple as the source [12][13][14] and that leprechaun economics was the largest ever base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) action,[15] as well as the largest hybrid–tax inversion of a U.S. corporation.[3][16]

Leprechaun economics marked the replacement of Ireland's prohibited BEPS tool, the Double Irish, with the more powerful Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets (CAIA) tool, or "Green Jersey".[13][14] Apple used the CAIA BEPS tool to restructure out of its hybrid–Double Irish BEPS tool, on which the EU Commission would levy a €13 billion fine in August 2016 for illegal avoidance of Irish taxes.[lower-alpha 2][13][14] As a result of Leprechaun economics, Ireland, already qualified as a "major tax haven", was estimated by academics as the world's largest tax haven.[18][19][20][21]

Leprechaun economics had follow-on consequences. In September 2016, Ireland became the first of the major tax havens to be "blacklisted" by a G20 economy, Brazil.[22] In February 2017, Ireland replaced GDP with "Modified GNI (or GNI*)" (2017 Irish GDP was 162% of 2017 Irish GNI*, where as EU–28 2017 GDP was 100% of GNI).[23][24] In December 2017, the U.S and the EU introduced countermeasures to Irish BEPS tools.[25][26][27] In October 2018, Ireland introduced a "reverse Leprechaun tax", to discourage IP from leaving Ireland.[28] In 2018, the OECD showed Ireland's public "debt metrics" differ dramatically depending on whether Debt-to-GDP, Debt-to-GNI* or Debt-per-Capita is used;[29][30][31] and in 2019, the IMF estimated 60 per cent of Irish foreign direct investment was "phantom".[32][33][34]

Naming and use

2015 GDP data

On the 12 July 2016 at 11am GMT, the Central Statistics Office posted a data revision showing that 2015 Irish GDP data rose by 26.3 per cent[lower-alpha 1] and 2015 Irish GNP rose by 18.7 per cent.[5] Twenty four minutes later, at 11.24am GMT, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman responded to the data-release:

Leprechaun economics: Ireland reports 26 percent growth! But it doesn't make sense. Why are these in GDP?

— Paul Krugman, 12 July 2016[35]

Over the 12 to 13 July 2016, the term leprechaun economics was used widely by the Irish and international media when discussing Ireland's revised 26.3% 2015 GDP growth rate.[6][7][8][9][36][1][2] Leprechaun economics became a label for the Irish 2015 GDP 26.3% growth rate, and has been as such by a diverse range of sources.[37][38] In December 2019, the Irish Times named "Leprechaun Economics", as one of its "Top 10 business stories of the decade".[16]

Irish economy

Since July 2016, leprechaun economics has become used by economists in relation to caveats and concerns regarding Irish economic data.[39][40][41][42]

Nobody believes our GDP numbers any more, not after a 26 per cent jump in 2015, which was famously derided as "leprechaun economics". Even the CSO cautions against viewing last year's [2017] 7.8 per cent jump as a reflection of real economic activity

— The Irish Times, 17 March 2018[43]

In March 2018, the first paper was published in an established international economic journal, the New Political Economy, with leprechaun economics in its title: "Celtic Phoenix or Leprechaun Economics? The Politics of an FDI-led Growth Model in Europe".[44] By September 2018, the term leprechaun economics had been used 83 times during debates in the Irish Dáil Éireann.[45]

In September 2019, former Northern Ireland minister Nelson McCausland, criticised Ireland's reliance on tax-driven schemes for economic growth, which he referred to as Leprechaun economics, in an opinion piece for The Belfast Telegraph titled: "Northern Ireland will prosper once it’s rid of the EU... not by being tied to 'economics of the leprechaun'".[46]

Wider use

Since July 2016, leprechaun economics has also been used many times (and by Krugman himself), to refer to distorted or unsound economic data outside of Ireland, including by:

  1. Krugman, in relation to the effects of the US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act[47]
  2. Krugman, in relation to national statistics from some Eastern European Countries[48]
  3. Irish Times, in relation to Irish house building completion statistics[49]
  4. Bloomberg, in relation to US economic data and in particular, US trade deficit figures[50]
  5. U.S. Council on Foreign Relations, in relation to the increasing distortion of EU–28 economic data by Ireland and the Netherlands[51][52]

In January 2020, Krugman noted in the New York Times the more general application of the term, saying: "Now, I've coined a few economic phrases I'm proud of: "leprechaun economics" for the distortion of statistics caused by multinational corporations in search of tax havens, ...";[10] and followed with tweet saying: "You know what's really gratifying as a commentator? When a phrase you coined (leprechaun economics) is widely used without attribution. No, really — it means you've changed the discourse".[53]

Obfuscation of source (2016)

Statistics Act
In July 2016, Irish Finance Minister Michael Noonan attributed "leprechaun economics" to a range of multinationals restructuring pre the closure of the Double Irish BEPS tool, and aircraft leasing transactions.[lower-alpha 3]

Despite the scale of the revision to 2015 Irish GDP,[54] the Irish Central Statistics Office issued a short one-page note on 12 July 2016 explaining that it was as a result of an annual benchmarking exercise. The office also stated that: "As a consequence of the overall scale of these additions, elements of the results that would previously been published are now suppressed to protect the confidentiality of the contributing companies, in accordance with the Statistics Act 1993."[11]

On the 12 July 2016, the Irish State attributed the 2015 growth revision to a combination of factors, including aircraft purchases (Ireland is a hub for aircraft securitisation),[lower-alpha 3] and the reclassification of technology and pharmaceutical corporate balance sheets following the closure of the Double Irish tax scheme in 2014,[56][57] despite the fact that existing users of the Double Irish, which Noonan was referring to, had until 2020 to switch out of their Irish BEPS tool.[58][59]

On 13 July 2016, the ex-Governor of the Central Bank of Ireland made the following comment:

The statistical distortions created by the impact on the Irish National Accounts of the global assets and activities of a handful of large multinational corporations have now become so large as to make a mockery of conventional uses of Irish GDP.

— Patrick Honohan, ex-Governor of the Central Bank of Ireland, 13 July 2016[60]

The delay by the Central Statistics Office in publishing revisions to Q1 2015 data (the period in which the growth appeared), as well as the redaction of regular data from 2016–2017, meant that it would take almost three years for economists to show § Proof of Apple (2018) in Q1 2018. In addition, the Central Statistics Office further obfuscated the picture by asserting that the "leprechaun economics" growth was not attributable to a main source, but was from several sources and part of Ireland's position as a Modernised Global Economy.[61]

While the Double Irish is a widely used Irish BEPS tool, Apple's Irish subsidiary, ASI, used a hybrid version approved by the Irish Revenue, which the EU Commission argued was State aid. In September 2016, the Central Statistics Office again refuted this claim and repeated its assertion that the growth was from a range of sources including aircraft leasing.[62]

By early 2017, research in the Sloan School of Management in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, using the limited data released by the Irish Central Statistics Office, concluded: While corporate inversions and aircraft leasing firms were credited for increasing Irish [2015] GDP, the impact may have been exaggerated.[63]

The use by Ireland of complex data protection and data privacy laws, such as contained in the 1993 Statistics Act, to protect Irish BEPS tools and Irish corporate tax avoidance schemes is documented by tax justice groups (see captured state). The Irish Central Statistics Office was accused of "putting on the green jersey" to hide Apple's tax planning schemes, by some Irish political opposition groups.[64] The Central Statistics Office (Ireland) did not list Modified GNI (discussed later) in their Key Summary Economic Indicitors for September 2018, but only quote GDP, GNP and Debt-to-GDP.[65]

EU GDP levy

In July 2016, the Irish media reported that while the drivers of Ireland's "leprechaun economics" growth might not have produced tangible additional tax revenues for Ireland, the 26.3%[lower-alpha 1] rise in Ireland's GDP directly increased the due cost of Ireland's annual EU budget levy, which is calculated as a percentage of Eurostat GDP, by an estimated €380 million per annum.[66][67][2]

In September 2016, the Irish government appealed to the EU Commission to amend the terms of the EU GDP levy to a GNI approach, so Ireland would not incur the full €380 million increase. There were unsubstantiated claims by the Irish government that the effective impact of the increase in the GDP levy would be reduced to circa €280 million per annum.[68]

The "leprechaun economics" affair prompted an October 2016 audit by Eurostat into Ireland's economic statistics, including questions from the International Monetary Fund, however no irregularities were detected and it was accepted that the Irish Central Statistics Office had followed the Eurostat guidelines, as detailed in the Eurostat ESA 2010 Guidelines manual, in preparing the 2015 National Accounts.[69][70]

On the 8 November 2016, a report by the EU Director-General for Internal Policies ("DG IPOL") on Ireland's "leprechaun economics" affair, noted that Detailed explanations are not provided, due to confidentiality rules aimed at protecting companies, and that the International Monetary Fund had stated that Additional metrics better reflecting the underlying developments of the Irish economy should be developed.[70] The report concluded that: It is becoming increasingly difficult to represent the complexity of economic activity in Ireland in a single headline indicator such as GDP.[70]

Introduction of GNI* (2017)
Ratio of GNI to GDP National Accounts Data (2011), Eurostat.[71][72]

Pre-2015 distortions

From early academic research on tax havens by James R. Hines Jr. in 1994, Ireland has been noted as a tax haven (one of Hines' seven major havens).[73] Hines would go on to become the most-cited author in the research of tax havens,[74] recording Ireland's rise to become the 3rd largest global tax haven in the Hines 2010 list.[75] As well as identifying and ranking tax havens, Hines, and others, including Dhammika Dharmapala, established that one of the main attributes of tax havens, is the artificial distortion of the haven's GDP from the BEPS accounting flows.[76] The highest GDP-per-capita countries, excluding oil and gas nations, are all tax havens.[21]

In 2010, as part of Ireland's ECB bailout, Eurostat began tracking the distortion of Ireland's national accounts by BEPS flows. By 2011, Eurostat showed that Ireland's ratio of GNI to GDP, had fallen to 80% (i.e. Irish GDP was 125% of Irish GNI, or artificially inflated by 25%). Only Luxembourg, who ranked 1st on Hines' 2010 list of global tax havens,[75] was lower at 73% (i.e. Luxembourg GDP was 137% of Luxembourg GNI). Eurostat's GNI/GDP table (see graphic) showed EU GDP is equal to EU GNI for almost every EU country, and for the aggregate EU–27 average.[71][78] A 2015 Eurostat report showed that from 2010 to 2015, almost 23% of Ireland's GDP was now represented by untaxed multinational net royalty payments, thus implying that Irish GDP was now circa 130% of Irish GNI (e.g. artificially inflated by 30%).[79]

Climax of 2015

Apple's Q1 2015 BEPS transaction implied that Irish GDP was now well over 155% of Irish GNI, exceeding even Luxembourg, and making it inappropriate for ongoing monitoring of the high level of Irish indebtedness. In response, in February 2017, the Central Bank of Ireland became the first of the major tax havens to abandon GDP and GNP as metrics, and replaced them with a new measure: Modified gross national income, or GNI* (or GNI Star).[23]

In July 2017, the Financial Times reporting on the new GNI* measure said: "The Irish economy is about a third smaller than expected. The country’s current account surplus is actually a deficit. And its debt level is at least a quarter higher than taxpayers have been led to believe"; and that "Embarrassed by what Paul Krugman, the economist, denounced as "leprechaun economics", Ireland's policymakers were determined to avoid a repeat".[80]

At this point, multinational profit shifting doesn't just distort Ireland’s balance of payments; it constitutes Ireland’s balance of payments.

— Brad Setser and Cole Frank, Council on Foreign Relations, "Tax Avoidance and the Irish Balance of Payments", 25 April 2018[3]

The move was timely; in 2018, research using 2015 data showed Ireland had become the world's largest tax haven (Zucman–Tørsløv–Wier 2018 list).[18][19][20][21]

In Apri 2018, Eurostat welcomed GNI*, but showed it could not eliminate all BEPS effects (e.g. as the distortion in OECD Irish debt metrics showed).[81]

Proof of Apple (2018)
Ireland: Trade Good Discrepancy (1995–2017). Brad Setser & Cole Frank (Council on Foreign Relations)

2018 filings

Economist Seamus Coffey is Chairman of the State's Irish Fiscal Advisory Council,[82] and authored the State's 2017 Review of Ireland's Corporation Tax Code.[83][84] Coffey had analysed Apple's Irish structure in detail,[85] and was interviewed by the international media on Apple in Ireland.[86] However, despite speculation,[87] the suppression of regular economic data by the Irish Central Statistics Office meant that no economist could confirm the source of "leprechaun economics" was Apple.

On 24 January 2018, Coffey published a long analysis on his respected economics blog, confirming the data now proved Apple was the source:[12]

We know Apple changed its structure from the first of January 2015. This is described in section 2.5.7 on page 42 of the EU Commission's decision [on Apple's State aid case].[17] This would be useful but bar telling us that the new structure came into operation on the first of January 2015 everything else is redacted. Although the details of the new structure were not revealed it was still felt that Ireland was still central to the structure and maybe even more so with the revised structure. Many of the dramatic shifts that occurred in Ireland's national accounts and balance of payments data were attributed to Apple but this was largely supposition – even if it was likely to be true. Now we know it to be true.

— Seamus Coffey, Economic Perspectives, University College Cork, 24 January 2018[12]
Ireland: Balance of Payments (2012–17). Brad Setser & Cole Frank (Council on Foreign Relations)

Coffey's January 2018 post also showed that Apple had restructured into the Irish Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets ("CAIA") BEPS tool. Apple's previous hybrid–Double Irish BEPS tool had a modest effect on Irish economic data as it was offshore. However, by onshoring their intellectual property ("IP") from Jersey, via the CAIA BEPS tool, the full effect of circa US$40 billion in profits that ASI was shifting by 2015 (see Table 1), would appear in the Irish national accounts; and was equivalent to over 20% of Irish GDP.[12] The IMF began to correlate the effect of Apple iPhone sales on the Irish economic cycle.[88][89]

Table 1: Estimate of profits shifted through Apple's Irish subsidiary, Apple Sales International ("ASI") from 2004–2014.[12]
Year
 ASI Profit
Shifted (USD m)		 Average
€/$ rate		 ASI Profit
Shifted (EUR m)		 Irish Corp.
Tax Rate		 Irish Corp. Tax
Avoided (EUR m)
2004268.80521612.5%27
2005725.80458312.5%73
20061,180.79794012.5%117
20071,844.7311,34712.5%168
20083,127.6832,13612.5%267
20094,003.7192,87812.5%360
201012,095.7559,12812.5%1,141
201121,855.71915,70912.5%1,964
201235,877.77827,91512.5%3,489
201332,099.75324,17612.5%3,022
201434,229.75425,79312.5%3,224
Total147,304110,82113,853

By April 2018, economists confirmed Coffey's analysis, and estimated Apple onshored USD 300 billion of IP from Jersey in Q1 2015 in the largest recorded BEPS action in history.[15][3][90][13] In June 2018, the GUE-NGL EU Parliament group published an analysis of Apple's new Irish CAIA BEPS tool, they labeled "the Green Jersey".[91][92][13]

On 17 February 2020, Krugman tweeted, "So Tim Cook is the leprechaun in leprechaun economics".[93]

Further concerns
In 2017, Finance Minister Donohoe reversed the benefits Noonan gave Apple's 2015 CAIA BEPS scheme, but only applied it to new schemes.

The November 2017 Paradise Papers leaks, documented how in 2014, Apple and its lawyers, offshore magic circle firm Appleby, looked for a replacement for Apple's Irish hybrid–Double Irish BEPS tool. The leaks showed Apple considering a number of tax havens, especially Jersey and Ireland. Some of the documents demonstrated that tax avoidance was the driver of Apple's decision making.[94][95][96]

Experts noted that it is prohibited under Ireland's tax code (Section 291A(c), Taxes and Consolation Act 1997), to use the CAIA BEPS tool for reasons that are not "commercial bona fide reasons", and in schemes where the main purpose is "... the avoidance of, or reduction in, liability to tax".[97][98][99][lower-alpha 4]

In November 2017, the Irish media noted that the then Finance Minister Michael Noonan, had increased the tax relief threshold for the Irish CAIA BEPS scheme from 80 per cent to 100 per cent in the 2015 budget, which would reduce the effective Irish corporate tax rate on the CAIA BEPS tool from 2.5 per cent to 0 per cent. This was changed back in the subsequent 2017 budget by the new Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe, however firms which had started their Irish CAIA BEPS tool in 2015, like Apple, were allowed to stay at the 100 per cent relief level for the duration of their scheme,[100][101] which can, under certain conditions, be extended indefinitely.[99]

In November 2017, it was reported that the EU Commission had asked for details on Apple's new Irish structure post the EU Commission's 2004–2014 ruling.[102]

In January 2018, when Seamus Coffey and others, estimated that since the Q1 2015 restructuring, Apple avoided Irish taxes of €2.5–3bn per annum, based on the 0% effective tax rate Noonan introduced for the CAIA scheme in the 2015 budget.[12][103] Coffey estimated that a second EU Apple State aid fine for the 2015–2018 (inclusive) period, could reach over €10bn, excluding interest penalties,[104][105] adding to Apple's existing €13 billion EU fine for the 2004–2014 period.

Impact on taxation

In July 2016, financial commentators were confused that Ireland had incurred €380 million per annum in additional EU GDP levies (earlier), but given Apple (in the 2015 budget, per above), an effective tax rate of 0% for the Apple IP that was onshored. Some pointed to the benefits of "leprechaun economics" to Ireland's credit rating, and Debt-to-GDP metrics.[106] In August 2016, however, Apple CEO Tim Cook, stated that Apple was now "the largest tax payer in Ireland".[107][108]

In April 2017, the Revenue Commissioners released Irish corporation tax data for 2015 showing a 49% increase, or €2.26 billion, to €6.87 billion in one year.[109] The report also showed that "intangible allowances", which are claimed under the CAIA BEPS tool, jumped by over 1,000 per cent, or €26.2 billion in 2015 (from €2.7 billion in 2014), which was consistent with the euro amount of profits that Apple's ASI was shifting through its hybrid–Double Irish BEPS tool at the time.[12] However, the €2.26 billion rise in corporate tax for 2015 looked similar to the effective tax ASI would pay in Ireland if it was not using Irish BEPS tools. No other company has been identified as the source of such a large jump in Irish corporation tax in a single year, as it required Irish booked profits of over US$30 billion.

Seamus Coffey posted several articles in 2018 on the rise in Irish "intangible allowances", which hit €35.7 billion in 2016, or €4.5 billion of Irish corporate tax avoided at the 12.5% rate.[110] This is consistent with 2018 research showing that the "Green Jersey" is the largest BEPS tool in the world. However, in the absence of confirming data, Coffey is reluctant to draw a parallel between the dramatic 2015 rise in Irish corporation tax receipts, which has carried into 2016, and any potential change of tax strategy by Apple from the additional EU scrutiny into Apple's Q1 2015 restructure.[111]

In May 2019, The Times reported that IMF experts, including Erik De Vrijer, Director of the IMF's European department, expressed concern about the lack of official understanding about the driver in the dramatic rise in Irish corporation tax receipts since 2014, and the implications for long-term State spending.[112][lower-alpha 5]

Reverse leprechaun taxes (2019)
Dominance of U.S. companies: Irish corporate Gross Operating Surplus (i.e. profits), by the controlling country of the company (note: a material part of the Irish figure is also from U.S. tax inversions who are U.S.–controlled). Eurostat (2015).[113]

In October 2018, Irish Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe introduced an IP exit-tax, which the Irish Independent described as being "to prevent a 'reverse leprechaun'".[28] The new tax legislation classifies any gains realised in Ireland as a result of a multinational selling its Irish–based IP to another jurisdiction, as an Irish capital gain. While the Irish rate of capital gains tax was 33 per cent, the new legislation gave a lower rate of 12.5 per cent on IP capital gains; however this could be subject to change (or challenged by the EU Commission), and the rate brought into alignment with the general Irish 33 per cent capital gains tax rate.[114][115]

In October 2017, Seamus Coffey questioned whether "reverse leprechaun" taxes would have any effect on U.S. multinationals leaving Ireland:

In 2015 there were a number of “balance-sheet relocations” with companies who had acquired IP while resident outside the country becoming Irish-resident. It is possible that companies holding IP for which capital allowances are currently being claimed could become non-resident and remove themselves from the charge to tax in Ireland. If they leave in this fashion there will be no transaction that triggers an exit tax liability.

— Seamus Coffey, "Intangibles, taxation and Ireland's contribution to the EU Budget", October 2017[116]

Legacy

Distortion of Irish statistics

Since leprechaun economics, research groups and commentators have highlighted that many Irish statistics are materially distorted by "leprechaun economics" type effects:[117]

  • In October 2017, the U.K. health-care journal The Lancet reported that leprechaun economics was distorting the understanding of comparative Irish health spending.[37]
  • In March 2018, the OECD showed that metrics of Irish public indebtedness were materially distorted by leprechaun economics.[29][30][31]
  • In February 2019, The Irish Times highlighted that Ireland's world-leading employee productivity statistics, were likely as a result of leprechaun economics effects.[118][119] In July 2019, the Irish Times drew further parallels with "Leprechaun Economics" and OECD statistics that "... suggested Irish workers were the most productive on the planet, ..."[120]
  • In September 2019, the IMF, estimated that two thirds of Ireland's Financial Direct Investment (FDI) was "phantom",[32][33] and referred to the underlying complications of leprechaun economics as, "Prominent cases include Irish GDP growth of 26 percent in 2015, following some multinationals’ relocation of intellectual property rights to Ireland".[34]

Distortion of EU-28 GDP statistics

By April 2018, economists noted EU-28 aggregate GDP was being distorted by Irish BEPS tools, and the Apple iPhone sales cycle.[51] By January 2020, economists had begun to realise that the Netherlands, as well as Ireland was also distorting EU-28 statistics, with the US Council of Foreign Relations, in a note titled: "Leprechaun Adjusted Euro Area GDP", said: "The entire euro area's economic statistics now need to be adjusted to remove the distortions created by the tax transactions of large multinationals operating in Ireland and the Netherlands".[52]

Anti-Irish taxation measures
Further information: Tax inversion § Countermeasures, and Ireland as a tax haven § Countermeasures

In September 2016, Ireland became the first of the major tax havens, to be "blacklisted" by a G20 economy, Brazil.[22]

In December 2017, the U.S. and EU introduced new anti-Irish BEPS tool tax regimes (e.g. the U.S. GILTI–BEAT–FDII regimes, and the EU Digital Service Tax).[25][26][27]

Further use of the CAIA tool

In July 2018, it was reported that Microsoft was preparing to execute a "Green Jersey" BEPS transaction.[121] which, due to technical issues with the TCJA, makes the CAIA BEPS tool attractive to U.S. multinationals. In July 2018, Coffey posted that Ireland could see a "boom" in the onshoring of U.S. IP between now and 2020.[122] In May 2019, it was reported Microsoft moved $52.8bn of IP assets to Ireland.[123] In January 2020, the Irish Times speculated that Google Inc., was also considering using the CAIA BEPS tool, and noting that the CAIA had helped "trigger the Leprechaun Economics affair".[14]

gollark: I suppose the buttons are likely to be clicky.
gollark: And a battery.
gollark: You should just get a Pi and stick a screen and small keyboard on it.
gollark: I'm not one to buy expensive stuff with massively less power than my phone.
gollark: Yeeess...

See also

Explantory notes
  1. The Central Statistics Office (Ireland) further restated Irish 2015 data several times in 2017–18; by September 2018, Irish 2015 GDP was a further 6.4% above the 12 July 2016 restatement, as listed in Irish GDP versus Modified GNI (2009–2017). This was the highest post-war annual GDP growth of an OECD country.[4]
  2. From a 9 January 2015 meeting with the EU Commission which was documented when the EU Commission published their full decision (S.A 38373), page 42 section 2.5.7 Apple's new corporate structure in Ireland as of 2015.[17]
  3. In May 2019, the Irish Independent would report figures from the Department of Finance showing that since 2012, the net assets (e.g. a figure which would contribute to Irish GDP) of the aircraft leasing industry in Ireland was close to zero. They also reported that the revenues of aircraft leasing in Ireland only increased by €2.4 billion in 2015 (also a figure which would contribute to Irish GDP), versus the €67.4 billion increase from Leprechaun economics.[55]
  4. This, if the Irish Revenue waived its anti-avoidance measures under Section 291A(c) to Apple's benefit, it could be construed as illegal EU State aid.
  5. As discussed in Ireland as a tax haven, Section 815A of the 1997 Tax Acts prevents disclosure of Irish taxation data, even to other officers of the Irish State, outside of the Irish Revenue Commissioners.[108]

Citations
  1. Padraic Halpin (13 July 2016). "'Leprechaun economics' leaves Irish growth story in limbo". Reuters News. Archived from the original on 30 March 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2019.
  2. Mark Deen; Dara Doyle (13 July 2016). ""Leprechaun Economics" Earn Ireland Ridicule, $443 Million Bill". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 28 April 2019. Retrieved 27 April 2019.
  3. Brad Setser; Cole Frank (25 April 2018). "Tax Avoidance and the Irish Balance of Payments". Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the original on 28 April 2018. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
  4. "The World Bank Database: Real GDP Data". The World Bank. 2018. Archived from the original on 30 August 2018. Retrieved 30 August 2018.
  5. CSO Statistical Release (12 July 2016). "National Income and Expenditure Annual Results 2015". Central Statistics Office (Ireland). Archived from the original on 22 November 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2018.
  6. Colm Kelpie (13 July 2016). "'Leprechaun economics' - Ireland's 26pc growth spurt laughed off as 'farcical'". Irish Independent. Archived from the original on 14 June 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2019.
  7. Eoin Burke Kennedy; Ciarán Hancock (13 July 2016). "Concern as Irish growth rate dubbed 'leprechaun economics'". Irish Times. Archived from the original on 19 March 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2019.
  8. "Blog: The real story behind Ireland's 'Leprechaun' economics fiasco". RTÉ News. 25 July 2017. Archived from the original on 20 March 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2019.
  9. Vincent Boland (12 July 2016). "Irish tell a tale of 26.3% growth spurt". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 19 March 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2019. Rate attributed to multinational inversions — or "leprechaun economics"
  10. Paul Krugman (28 January 2020). "Opinion". New York Times. Retrieved 28 January 2020. Now, I've coined a few economic phrases I'm proud of: "leprechaun economics" for the distortion of statistics caused by multinational corporations in search of tax havens, .. [.]
  11. "CSO Press Release" (PDF). Central Statistics Office (Ireland). 12 July 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 November 2017. Retrieved 20 March 2019. As a consequence of the overall scale of these additions, elements of the results that would previously been published are now suppressed to protect the confidentiality of the contributing companies, in accordance with the Statistics Act 1993
  12. Seamus Coffey, Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (24 January 2018). "What Apple did next". Economic Perspectives, University College Cork. Archived from the original on 30 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  13. Patrick Syth, European Editor (13 September 2019). "Explainer: Apple's €13bn tax appeal has huge implications". Irish Times. Retrieved 15 October 2019. Apple has changed its own corporate structure, restructured a new Irish Beps tool called Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets (CAIA), also nicknamed the “Green Jersey”. The bookkeeping change was so significant that it contributed to the extraordinary one-off revision in Irish GDP for 2015 by 26 per cent (later revised to 34.4 per cent).
  14. David Chance (3 January 2020). "Why Google might still benefit from Irish tax breaks". Irish Times. Retrieved 30 January 2020. Apple restructured its tax operations in 2015 using the State's capital allowance for intangible assets (CAIA), helping trigger the so-called Leprechaun Economics effect that year when the Irish economy suddenly surged by 26pc
  15. Erik Sherman (8 January 2020). "New Laws Meant to Close Down Tax Havens and Shut Loopholes Could Have the Opposite Effect". Fortune. Retrieved 7 February 2020. By April 2018, economists estimated Apple had onshored [to Ireland] $300 billlion of intellectual property from Jersey in Q1 2015, appartently the largest recorded BEPS action in history. This was equivalent to over 20% of Irish GDP"
  16. Eoin Burke-Kennedy (27 December 2019). "Top 10 business stories of the decade". Irish Times. Retrieved 28 January 2020.
  17. "Commission Decision of 30.8.2016 on State Aid Sa. 38373 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2014/CP) implemented by Ireland to Apple" (PDF). EU Commission. 30 August 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 April 2018. Retrieved 1 September 2018. Brussels. 30.8.2016 C(2016) 5605 final. Total Pages (130)
  18. Gabriel Zucman; Thomas Torslov; Ludvig Wier (June 2018). "The Missing Profits of Nations". National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Papers. p. 31. Archived from the original on 2 April 2019. Retrieved 25 April 2019. Appendix Table 2: Tax Havens
  19. Richard Rubin (10 June 2018). "Zucman:Corporations Push Profits Into Corporate Tax Havens as Countries Struggle in Pursuit, Gabrial Zucman Study Says". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 4 April 2019. Retrieved 25 April 2019. Such profit shifting leads to a total annual revenue loss of $200 billion globally
  20. Mark Paul (13 June 2018). "Ireland is the world's biggest corporate 'tax haven', say academics". Irish Times. Archived from the original on 24 August 2018. Retrieved 25 April 2019. New Gabriel Zucman study claims State shelters more multinational profits than the entire Caribbean
  21. Aidan Regan (25 April 2019). "Ireland is a tax haven — and that's becoming controversial at home". Washington Post. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
  22. Paul O’Donoghue (16 September 2016). "Ireland is trying to get off a Brazilian black list for tax havens". TheJournal.ie. Archived from the original on 17 May 2018. Retrieved 17 May 2018.
  23. Whelan, Sean (4 February 2017). "Leprechaun-proofing economic data". RTÉ.ie. RTÉ News. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  24. "Real GDP per capita". Eurostat. Archived from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  25. Cliff Taylor (30 November 2017). "Trump's US tax reform a significant challenge for Ireland". Irish Times. Archived from the original on 25 June 2018. Retrieved 17 May 2018.
  26. "Shake-up of EU tax rules a 'more serious threat' to Ireland than Brexit". Irish Independent. 14 September 2017. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 17 May 2018.
  27. Cliff Taylor (14 March 2018). "Why Ireland faces a fight on the corporate tax front". Irish Times. Archived from the original on 2 April 2018. Retrieved 17 May 2018.
  28. Dan O'Brien (14 October 2018). "Budget exit tax move has reduced risk of damaging 'reverse leprechaun' effect". Irish Independent. Archived from the original on 14 October 2018. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
  29. OECD Ireland Survey 2018 (PDF). OECD. March 2018. p. 34. ISBN 978-92-64-29177-5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 April 2018. Retrieved 4 April 2018.
  30. Fiona Reddan (12 September 2018). "Who still owes more, Ireland or the Greeks". Irish Times. Archived from the original on 12 September 2018. Retrieved 15 September 2018.
  31. "National debt now €44000 per head". Irish Independent. 7 July 2017. Archived from the original on 7 April 2018. Retrieved 7 April 2018.
  32. Martin Sandbu (9 September 2020). "Almost two-thirds of Irish FDI is 'phantom' – IMF study". Irish Times. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  33. Cliff Taylor (12 September 2020). "Is it true to say Ireland is one of the world's biggest tax havens?". Irish Times. Retrieved 30 January 2020. One recent report said that the bulk of the foreign direct investment here was “phantom” and driven by tax avoidance. Another said that we are one of the world’s biggest tax havens. [..] More leprechaun economics at work?
  34. Jannick Damgaard; Thomas Elkjaer; Niels Johannesen (September 2019). "The Rise of Phantom Investments". Finance & Development. 56 (3). Prominent cases include Irish GDP growth of 26 percent in 2015, following some multinationals’ relocation of intellectual property rights to Ireland, and Luxembourg’s status as one of the world’s largest FDI hosts.
  35. "Leprechaun Economics". Paul Krugman (Twitter). 12 July 2016. Archived from the original on 16 June 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2019. Leprechaun economics: Ireland reports 26 percent growth! But it doesn't make sense. Why are these in GDP?
  36. Paul Hosford (13 July 2016). ""Leprechaun economics" - experts aren't impressed with Ireland's GDP figures". TheJournal.ie. Archived from the original on 13 April 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2019.
  37. Turner, B. (March 2018). "Putting Ireland's health spending into perspective" (PDF). The Lancet. 391 (10123): 833–834. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30461-6. PMID 29508738. Similarly, health spending as a percentage of GDP declined sharply in 2015, despite an increase in health spending, as Irish GDP increased by 26% (a figure that spawned the phrase leprechaun economics)
  38. Douglas Broom (19 March 2019). "Everything you need to know about Ireland's economy". World Economic Forum. Retrieved 30 January 2020. 'Leprechaun economics'
  39. Aidan Regan; Samual Brazys (6 September 2017). "Celtic Phoenix or Leprechaun Economics? The Politics of an FDI-led Growth Model in Europe" (PDF). New Political Economy. 23 (2): 223–238. doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1370447.
  40. Cormac Lucey (13 August 2018). "Multinationals' smoke and mirrors obscure our strong indigenous performance". Irish Management Institute. Archived from the original on 25 August 2018. Retrieved 25 August 2018. The bulk of that decline occurred in 2015 when MFP in the FDI sector dropped by a leprechaun-like 57.2%. It begs the question, does ‘Official Ireland’ really understand what the multinationals are up to here?
  41. Zachary Basu (15 August 2018). "Europe moves on from financial crisis, but Greece is still recovering". Axios. Archived from the original on 30 September 2018. Retrieved 25 August 2018. Its skyrocketing GDP is heavily skewed by "leprechaun economics," a term used to describe the tax inversion practices of corporations like Apple that base subsidiaries in Ireland.
  42. Cantillon (14 July 2018). "Does the CSO have another leprechaun on the loose?". Irish Times.
  43. Eoin Burke-Kennedy (17 March 2018). "Give me a crash course in .... Irish economic growth". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 25 August 2018. Retrieved 25 August 2018. Nobody believes our GDP numbers any more, not after a 26 per cent jump in 2015, which was famously derided as "leprechaun economics". Even the CSO cautions against viewing last year's [2017] 7.8 per cent jump as a reflection of real economic activity
  44. Aidan Regan; Samuel Brazys (March 2018). "Celtic Phoenix or Leprechaun Economics? The Politics of an FDI-led Growth Model in Europe" (PDF). New Political Economy. 23 (2): 223–238. doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1370447.
  45. "Dail Eireann Oireachtas Debates: Search". Archived from the original on 26 August 2018. Retrieved 26 August 2018.
  46. Nelson McCausland (12 September 2019). "Nelson McCausland: Northern Ireland will prosper once it's rid of the EU... not by being tied to 'economics of the leprechaun'". The Belfast Telegraph. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  47. Paul Krugman (8 November 2017). "Leprechaun Economics and Neo-Lafferism". New York Times. Archived from the original on 30 April 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  48. Paul Krugman (4 December 2017). "Leprechauns of Eastern Europe". New York Times. Archived from the original on 13 February 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  49. Dermot O'Leary (21 April 2017). "Housing data reveals return of 'leprechaun economics'". Irish Times. Archived from the original on 20 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  50. Leonid Bershidsky (19 July 2017). "The U.S. Has a 'Leprechaun Economy' Effect, Too". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 21 April 2018. Retrieved 20 April 2018.
  51. Brad Setser (11 May 2018). "Ireland Exports its Leprechaun". Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the original on 14 May 2018. Retrieved 13 May 2018. Ireland has, more or less, stopped using GDP to measure its own economy. And on current trends [because Irish GDP is distorting EU–28 aggregate data], the eurozone taken as a whole may need to consider something similar.
  52. Brad W. Setser (20 January 2020). "Leprechaun Adjusted Euro Area GDP". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 28 January 2020.
  53. Paul Krugman (23 January 2020). "Leprechaun Economics". Twitter. Retrieved 28 January 2020.
  54. "Economy grew by 'dramatic' 26% last year after considerable asset reclassification". RTÉ News. 12 July 2016. Archived from the original on 19 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  55. Gordon Deegan (23 May 2019). "Aircraft-leasing industry paid €54m in corporation tax in 2018". Irish Independent. Retrieved 23 May 2019. During the same period, the assets of the companies concerned increased from €65.8bn in 2012 to €141.6bn in 2016 while the industry's liabilities increased from €60.6bn in 2012 to €141.1bn in 2016. The assets in 2016 included €4.8bn in cash deposits.
  56. "Ireland Abolish Double Irish Tax Scheme". The Guardian. 14 October 2014. Archived from the original on 4 January 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018. Ireland has officially announced the phased abolition of its controversial “Double Irish” tax scheme that has enabled multinationals such as Apple to dramatically cut down their tax bills
  57. "Brussels in crackdown on 'Double Irish' tax loophole". The Financial Times. October 2014. Archived from the original on 22 July 2018. Retrieved 26 August 2018.
  58. Anthony Ting (October 2014). "Ireland's move to close the 'Double Irish' tax loophole unlikely to bother Apple, Google". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 22 July 2018. Retrieved 26 August 2018. First, existing companies incorporated in Ireland will enjoy a long “grandfather” period. In particular, the new rule will not be applicable to these companies – including the Irish subsidiaries of Google and Microsoft – until 2021
  59. "Handful of multinationals behind 26.3% growth in GDP". Irish Times. 12 July 2016. Archived from the original on 19 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018. A handful of multinational companies in the tech, pharma and aircraft leasing sectors were responsible for an extraordinary jump in Ireland’s headline rate of economic growth last year
  60. Patrick Honohan (13 July 2016). "The Irish National Accounts: Towards some do's and don'ts". irisheconomy.ie. Archived from the original on 29 April 2018. Retrieved 28 April 2018.
  61. Michael Connolly (November 2016). "Challenges of Measuring the Modern Global Economy" (PDF). Central Statistics Office (Ireland). Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 May 2018. Retrieved 17 May 2018.
  62. "'Leprechaun Economics' not all down to Apple move, insists CSO". Irish Independent. 9 September 2016. Archived from the original on 19 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018. Last night, CSO statistician Andrew McManus insisted that the earlier guidance had been correct. "There were a number of factors involved. That was the situation then and now," he said.
  63. Daniel Tierney (2017). "Finding "Gold" in Leprechaun Economics". MIT Sloan School of Management. p. 5,28,30.
  64. Pearse Doherty (November 2016). 'Leprechaun economics' has damaged the reputation of Ireland's economic data. Sinn Féin.
  65. "Key Economic Indicators". Central Statistics Office (Ireland). 2018. Archived from the original on 26 August 2018. Retrieved 1 September 2018.
  66. "Now 'Leprechaun Economics' puts Budget spending at risk". Irish Independent. 21 July 2016. Archived from the original on 20 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  67. "Leprechaun economics pushes Ireland's EU bill up to €2bn". Irish Independent. 30 September 2017. Archived from the original on 19 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  68. "Ireland to avoid EU €280m 'leprechaun economics' penalty". Irish Independent. 23 September 2016. Archived from the original on 29 March 2018. Retrieved 29 March 2018.
  69. "'Leprechaun economics': EU mission to audit 26% GDP rise". Irish Times. 19 August 2016. Archived from the original on 29 June 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  70. J. Angerer; M. Hradiský; M. Magnus; A. Zoppé; M. Ciucci; J. Vega Bordell; M.T. Bitterlich (8 November 2016). "Economic Dialogue with Ireland Box 1: GDP statistics in Ireland: 'Leprechaun economics'?" (PDF). EU Commission. p. 3.
  71. Seamus Coffey, Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (29 April 2013). "International GNI to GDP Comparisons". Economic Incentives. Archived from the original on 19 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  72. "Europe points finger at Ireland over tax avoidance". Irish Times. 7 March 2018. Archived from the original on 7 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018. Multinational companies have made such extensive use of Ireland to funnel royalties – a common way to shift profits and avoid tax – that these payments averaged 23 per cent of the country’s annual gross domestic product between 2010 and 2015, according to an EU Commission report seen by the Financial Times.
  73. James R. Hines Jr.; Eric M. Rice (February 1994). "Fiscal Paradise: Foreign Tax havens and American Business" (PDF). Quarterly Journal of Economics (Harvard/MIT). 9 (1). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 August 2017. Retrieved 24 August 2018. We identify 41 countries and regions as tax havens for the purposes of U. S. businesses. Together the seven tax havens with populations greater than one million (Hong Kong, Ireland, Liberia, Lebanon, Panama, Singapore, and Switzerland) account for 80 percent of total tax haven population and 89 percent of tax haven GDP.
  74. "IDEAS/RePEc Database". Archived from the original on 4 December 2018. Retrieved 24 August 2018. Tax Havens by Most Cited
  75. James R. Hines Jr. (2010). "Treasure Islands". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 4 (24): 103–125. Table 2: Largest Tax Havens
  76. Dhammika Dharmapala (2014). "What Do We Know About Base Erosion and Profit Shifting? A Review of the Empirical Literature". University of Chicago. Archived from the original on 20 July 2018. Retrieved 24 August 2018.
  77. Valentia Romei (13 May 2015). "Ireland is the wealthiest economy in Europe…or not". Financial Times. Retrieved 7 February 2020.
  78. Heike Joebges (January 2017). "Crisis Recovery in a Country With a High Presence of Foreign-Owned Companies: The Case of Ireland" (PDF). IMK Macroeconomic Policy Institute, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
  79. "Europe points finger at Ireland over tax avoidance". Irish Times. 7 March 2018. Archived from the original on 7 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  80. Vincent Boland (18 July 2017). "Ireland's 'de-globalised' data calculate a smaller economy". Financial Times. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  81. Silke Stapel-Weber; John Verrinder (December 2017). "Globalisation at work in statistics — Questions arising from the 'Irish case'" (PDF). EuroStat. p. 31. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 April 2018. Retrieved 24 August 2018. Nevertheless the rise in [Irish] GNI is still very substantial because the additional income flows of the companies (interest and dividends) concerned are considerably smaller than the value added of their activities
  82. "Chairman, Fiscal Advisory Council: 'There's been a very strong recovery - we are now living within our means'". Irish Independent. 18 January 2018. Archived from the original on 19 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  83. "Minister Donohoe publishes Review of Ireland's Corporation Tax Code". Department of Finance. 21 September 2017. Archived from the original on 24 April 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  84. Seamus Coffey, Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (30 June 2017). "Review of Ireland's Corporation Tax Code, Presented to the Minister for Finance and Public Expenditure and Reform" (PDF). Department of Finance (Ireland). Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 February 2018. Retrieved 21 March 2018.
  85. Seamus Coffey, Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (21 March 2016). "Apple Sales International–By the numbers". Economics Incentives, University College Cork. Archived from the original on 19 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018.
  86. Charles Arthur; Samuel Gibbs (30 September 2016). "Apple may have to repay millions from Irish government tax deal". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 19 March 2018. Retrieved 19 March 2018. Seamus Coffey, an economics lecturer at University College Cork, who has examined Apple’s Irish tax affairs, said: “The EC can demand back payments for 10 years, which would take it back to 2004.”
  87. "Apple tax affairs changes triggered a surge in Irish economy". The Irish Examiner. 18 September 2016. Archived from the original on 30 March 2018. Retrieved 29 March 2018. The Government has yet to admit that the enormous disruption to Irish GDP figures and the surge in corporate tax revenues was due to the actions of a single multi-national. [..] Karl Whelan, professor of economics at UCD, said a large part of the surge in corporate tax receipts and the huge GDP revisions can be attributed to the rearrangement of Apple’s tax affairs
  88. "Quarter of Irish economic growth due to Apple's iPhone, says IMF". RTÉ News. 17 April 2018. Archived from the original on 18 April 2018. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
  89. "iPhone exports accounted for quarter of Irish economic growth in 2017 - IMF". Irish Times. 17 April 2018. Archived from the original on 18 April 2018. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
  90. Brad Setser (30 October 2017). "Apple's Exports Aren't Missing: They Are in Ireland". Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the original on 29 April 2018. Retrieved 30 April 2018.
  91. Naomi Fowler (25 June 2018). "New Report on Apple's New Irish Tax Structure". Tax Justice Network. Archived from the original on 2 July 2018. Retrieved 4 August 2018.
  92. Martin Brehm Christensen; Emma Clancy (21 June 2018). "Apple's Irish Tax Deals". European United Left–Nordic Green Left EU Parliament. Archived from the original on 14 July 2018. Retrieved 4 August 2018.
  93. Paul Krugman (17 February 2020). "So Tim Cook is the leprechaun in leprechaun economics". Twitter.
  94. Jesse Drucker; Simon Bowers (6 November 2017). "After a Tax Crackdown, Apple Found a New Shelter for Its Profits". New York Times. Archived from the original on 6 November 2017. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
  95. "BBC Panorama Special Paradise Papers Apple Secret Bolthole Revealed". BBC News. 6 November 2017. Archived from the original on 1 August 2018. Retrieved 21 July 2018.
  96. "Apple used Jersey for new tax haven after Ireland crackdown, Paradise Papers reveal". Independent. 6 November 2017. Archived from the original on 29 March 2018. Retrieved 29 March 2018.
  97. "Capital allowances for intangible assets". Irish Revenue. 15 September 2017. Archived from the original on 24 March 2018. Retrieved 29 March 2018.
  98. "Intangible Assets Scheme under Section 291A Taxes Consolidation Act 1997" (PDF). Irish Revenue. 2010. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 December 2017. Retrieved 29 March 2018.
  99. "Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets under section 291A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 (Part 9 / Chapter2)" (PDF). Irish Revenue. February 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 March 2018. Retrieved 29 March 2018.
  100. "Tax break for IP transfers is cut to 80pc". Irish Independent. 11 October 2017. Archived from the original on 22 March 2018. Retrieved 21 March 2018.
  101. Cliff Taylor (8 November 2017). "Change in tax treatment of intellectual property and subsequent and reversal hard to fathom". Irish Times. Archived from the original on 21 March 2018. Retrieved 21 March 2018.
  102. "EU asks for more details of Apple's tax affairs". The Times. 8 November 2017. Archived from the original on 21 March 2018. Retrieved 21 March 2018.
  103. Jack Horgan-Jones; Seamus Coffey (28 January 2018). "Apple tax bill could climb by €9bn as firms dig in". The Sunday Business Post. Archived from the original on 31 March 2018. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
  104. Seamus Coffey (28 January 2018). "Why €13bn Apple tax payment may not be the end of the story". The Sunday Business Post. Archived from the original on 25 August 2018. Retrieved 21 March 2018.
  105. Pearse Doherty (25 January 2018). "Apple could owe billions more in tax due to its restructured tax arrangements since 2015". Sinn Féin. Archived from the original on 21 March 2018. Retrieved 21 March 2018.
  106. Sean Whelan (19 July 2016). "Making the most of leprechaun conomics". The Sunday Business Post. Archived from the original on 30 March 2018. Retrieved 29 March 2018.
  107. Peter Bodkin (30 August 2016). "Tim Cook: 'Apple is the largest taxpayer in Ireland'". TheJournal.ie. Archived from the original on 16 April 2019. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
  108. Dan MacGuill (4 September 2016). "FactCheck: Is Apple really the "largest taxpayer in Ireland"?". TheJournal.ie. Archived from the original on 27 April 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2019. Revenue said: "Interactions between Revenue and individual taxpayers are subject to the taxpayer confidentiality provisions of Section 851A".
  109. "An Analysis of 2015 Corporation Tax Returns and 2016 Payments" (PDF). Revenue Commissioners. April 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 November 2017. Retrieved 4 April 2018.
  110. Seamus Coffey, Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (17 July 2018). "Capital Allowances and companies with Net Trading Income that is negative or nil". Economic Incentives, University College Cork. Archived from the original on 25 August 2018. Retrieved 25 August 2018. And we see that after the application of losses, and most importantly, capital allowances, the resulting net trading income of these companies with almost €50 billion of Gross Trading Profits in 2016 was zero
  111. Seamus Coffey, Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (17 July 2018). "The 2016 Aggregate Corporation Tax Calculation". Economic Incentives, University College Cork. Archived from the original on 25 August 2018. Retrieved 25 August 2018. And, again it highlights, that although the surge in CT receipts may have happened in the same year as the jump in GDP, they are not necessarily directly related. As with lots of things lately, capital allowances play a central role in this and it is to them that we will turn next
  112. Paul O'Donoghue (1 May 2019). "Risky to count too much on corporation tax, IMF warns". The Times. Archived from the original on 1 May 2019. Retrieved 1 May 2019. [Irish] Corporation tax receipts have surged in recent years, doubling from €5.2 billion in 2014 to €10.4 billion last year [2018]. Experts are unsure about what has caused this spike.
  113. Seamus Coffey, Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (18 June 2018). "Who shifts profits to Ireland". Economic Incentives, University College Cork. Archived from the original on 20 November 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2018. Eurostat’s structural business statistics give a range of measures of the business economy broken down by the controlling country of the enterprises. Here is the Gross Operating Surplus generated in Ireland in 2015 for the countries with figures reported by Eurostat.
  114. John Gulliver (12 October 2018). "Ireland's Budget introduces new Exit Tax". Mason Hayes Curran Law Firm. Archived from the original on 13 November 2018. Retrieved 13 November 2018. While the early introduction of the regime was not widely anticipated, the good news is that the rate of the exit tax is 12.5% (the same rate of tax imposed on trading income) rather than the capital gains tax rate of 33% (subject to anti-avoidance rules).
  115. "Multinationals hit with surprise tax on assets exiting State". Irish Independent. 10 October 2018. Archived from the original on 13 November 2018. Retrieved 13 November 2018. It had been feared that the exit tax, one of five legally-binding anti-abuse measures to prevent aggressive tax planning, could have been applied in Ireland at the current capital gains tax rate of 33pc rather than the announced 12.5pc.
  116. "Intangibles, taxation and Ireland's contribution to the EU Budget". Seamus Coffey. 19 October 2017. Archived from the original on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 19 November 2018.
  117. Douglas Broom (19 March 2019). "Everything you need to know about Ireland's economy". World Economic Forum. Archived from the original on 25 March 2019. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  118. Cantillion (7 February 2019). "Productivity: the leprechauns are back". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 24 February 2019. Retrieved 24 February 2019. How did Irish workers get to be the most productive on the planet?
  119. Michael Hennigan (7 February 2019). "Irish workers most productive in world or same as Italians". FinFacts. Archived from the original on 24 February 2019. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
  120. Eoin-Burke Kennedy (25 July 2019). "Irish labour productivity growing at three times EU rate". Irish Times. Retrieved 3 March 2020.
  121. Ian Guider (24 June 2018). "Irish Microsoft firm worth $100bn ahead of merger". The Sunday Business Post. Archived from the original on 16 July 2018. Retrieved 4 August 2018.
  122. Seamus Coffey, Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (18 July 2018). "When can we expect the next wave of IP onshoring?". Economics Incentives, University College Cork. Archived from the original on 4 August 2018. Retrieved 24 August 2018. IP onshoring is something we should be expecting to see much more of as we move towards the end of the decade. Buckle up!
  123. Mark Paul (25 May 2019). "Microsoft moves $52.8bn of assets and its Asian trading operation to Ireland". Irish Times. Retrieved 29 January 2020.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.