1902 United States House of Representatives elections in California
The United States House of Representatives elections in California, 1902 was an election for California's delegation to the United States House of Representatives, which occurred as part of the general election of the House of Representatives on November 4, 1902. California gained one seat as a result of the 1900 Census, which Republicans won. However, of the existing districts, Democrats won three Republican-held districts.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
All 8 California seats to the United States House of Representatives | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Election results by district. |
Overview
United States House of Representatives elections in California, 1902 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Percentage | Seats | +/– | |
Republican | 152,373 | 52.36% | 5 | –2 | |
Democratic | 126,290 | 43.40% | 3 | +3 | |
Socialist | 8,500 | 2.92% | 0 | 0 | |
Prohibition | 3,860 | 1.33% | 0 | 0 | |
Totals | 291,023 | 100.00% | 8 | — |
Delegation Composition
Pre-election | Seats | |
Republican-Held | 7 | |
Post-election | Seats | |
Republican-Held | 5 | |
Democratic-Held | 3 | |
Results
District 1
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | James Gillett (incumbent) | 21,268 | 50.5 | |
Democratic | Anthony Caminetti | 19,696 | 46.7 | |
Socialist | M. F. Shore | 810 | 1.9 | |
Prohibition | W. O. Clark | 362 | 0.9 | |
Total votes | 42,136 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold | ||||
District 2
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | Theodore A. Bell | 21,536 | 49.2 | |||
Republican | Frank Coombs (incumbent) | 21,181 | 48.3 | |||
Socialist | G. H. Rogers | 731 | 1.7 | |||
Prohibition | W. P. Fassett | 367 | 0.8 | |||
Total votes | 43,815 | 100.0 | ||||
Turnout | ||||||
Democratic gain from Republican | ||||||
District 3
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Victor H. Metcalf (incumbent) | 20,532 | 66.2 | |
Democratic | Calvin B. White | 8,574 | 27.7 | |
Socialist | M. W. Wilkins | 1,556 | 5.0 | |
Prohibition | T. H. Montgomery | 338 | 1.1 | |
Total votes | 31,000 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold | ||||
District 4
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | Edward J. Livernash | 16,146 | 49.2 | |||
Republican | Julius Kahn (incumbent) | 16,005 | 48.7 | |||
Socialist | William Costley | 616 | 1.9 | |||
Prohibition | Joseph Rowell | 69 | 0.2 | |||
Total votes | 16,836 | 100.0 | ||||
Turnout | ||||||
Democratic gain from Republican | ||||||
District 5
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | William J. Wynn | 22,712 | 56.5 | |||
Republican | Eugene F. Loud (incumbent) | 16,577 | 41.2 | |||
Socialist | Joseph Lawrence | 620 | 1.5 | |||
Prohibition | Fred E. Caton | 301 | 0.8 | |||
Total votes | 40,210 | 100.0 | ||||
Turnout | ||||||
Democratic gain from Republican | ||||||
District 6
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | James C. Needham (incumbent) | 17,268 | 53.5 | |
Democratic | Gaston M. Ashe | 13,732 | 42.5 | |
Socialist | J. L. Cobb | 815 | 2.5 | |
Prohibition | Joel H. Smith | 466 | 1.4 | |
Total votes | 32,281 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold | ||||
District 7
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | James McLachlan (incumbent) | 19,407 | 64.8 | |
Democratic | Carl A. Johnson | 8,075 | 27.0 | |
Socialist | George H. Hewes | 1,261 | 4.2 | |
Prohibition | Frederick F. Wheeler | 1,195 | 4.0 | |
Total votes | 30,638 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold | ||||
District 8
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Milton J. Daniels | 20,135 | 55.6 | ||
Democratic | William E. Smythe | 15,819 | 40.8 | ||
Socialist | Noble A. Richardson | 2,091 | 5.4 | ||
Prohibition | Ellsworth Leonardson | 762 | 2.0 | ||
Total votes | 38,807 | 100.0 | |||
Turnout | |||||
Republican win (new seat) |
gollark: I have seen many older people just dump all their files on their desktop too.
gollark: It isn't; mobile OSes abstract it a lot, cloud storage kind of lacks directories or makes them annoying, and basically everything has search now.
gollark: I think they thought it would be isolated to a container or something?
gollark: And lots of stuff will just resolve to an uninterpretable CDN/cloud™ domain nowadays.
gollark: They can nontrivially see it by looking at the SNI sent when opening the TLS connection.
See also
- 58th United States Congress
- Political party strength in California
- Political party strength in U.S. states
- United States House of Representatives elections, 1902
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.