1908 United States House of Representatives elections in California
The United States House of Representatives elections in California, 1908 was an election for California's delegation to the United States House of Representatives, which occurred as part of the general election of the House of Representatives on November 3, 1908. All eight districts remained Republican.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
All 8 California seats to the United States House of Representatives | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Election results by district. |
Overview
United States House of Representatives elections in California, 1908 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Percentage | Seats | ||
Republican | 201,206 | 53.7% | 8 | ||
Democratic | 135,412 | 36.1% | 0 | ||
Socialist | 27,314 | 7.3% | 0 | ||
Prohibition | 9,155 | 2.4% | 0 | ||
Independence League | 1,714 | 0.5% | 0 | ||
Totals | 374,801 | 100.0% | 8 |
Results
District 1
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | William F. Englebright (incumbent) | 20,624 | 54.1 | |
Democratic | E. W. Holland | 14,031 | 36.8 | |
Socialist | D. N. Cunningham | 2,898 | 7.6 | |
Prohibition | W. P. Fassett | 546 | 1.4 | |
Total votes | 38,099 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold | ||||
District 2
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Duncan E. McKinlay (incumbent) | 28,627 | 57.5 | |
Democratic | W. K. Hays | 19,193 | 38.5 | |
Socialist | A. J. Gaylord | 2,003 | 4.0 | |
Total votes | 49,823 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold | ||||
District 3
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Joseph R. Knowland (incumbent) | 27,857 | 64.1 | |
Democratic | George Peckham | 9,889 | 22.8 | |
Socialist | O. W. Philbrick | 4,052 | 9.3 | |
Independence League | John A. Sands | 923 | 2.1 | |
Prohibition | T. H. Montgomery | 717 | 1.7 | |
Total votes | 43,438 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold | ||||
District 4
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Julius Kahn (incumbent) | 9,202 | 52.7 | |
Democratic | James G. Maguire | 7,497 | 42.9 | |
Socialist | K. J. Doyle | 699 | 4.0 | |
Prohibition | William N. Meserve | 60 | 0.3 | |
Total votes | 17,458 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold | ||||
District 5
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Everis A. Hayes (incumbent) | 28,127 | 49.1 | |
Democratic | George A. Tracy | 24,531 | 42.8 | |
Socialist | E. H. Misner | 3,640 | 6.3 | |
Prohibition | Walter E. Vail | 1,045 | 1.8 | |
Total votes | 57,343 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold | ||||
District 6
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | James C. Needham (incumbent) | 21,323 | 52.0 | |
Democratic | Fred P. Feliz | 15,868 | 38.7 | |
Socialist | W. M. Pattison | 2,288 | 5.6 | |
Prohibition | James W. Webb | 1,509 | 3.7 | |
Total votes | 40,988 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold | ||||
District 7
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | James McLachlan (incumbent) | 37,244 | 51.9 | |
Democratic | Jud R. Rush | 25,445 | 35.4 | |
Socialist | A. R. Holston | 4,432 | 6.2 | |
Prohibition | Marshall W. Atwood | 3,899 | 5.4 | |
Independence League | F. G. Hentig | 791 | 1.1 | |
Total votes | 71,811 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold | ||||
District 8
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Sylvester C. Smith | 28,202 | 50.5 | |
Democratic | William G. Irving | 18,958 | 33.9 | |
Socialist | George A. Garrett | 7,302 | 13.1 | |
Prohibition | James S. Edwards | 1,379 | 2.5 | |
Total votes | 45,831 | 100.0 | ||
Turnout | ||||
Republican hold | ||||
gollark: It would be silly to concat everything which had an interface of `int, int → int`, say, together into one call.
gollark: I mean, at the extreme end you could have everything be done by one syscall, which does *not* seem better.
gollark: I mean, it would be weird if it didn't.
gollark: Sure?
gollark: Overloading things when they work quite differently doesn't actually make stuff *simpler*.
See also
- 61st United States Congress
- Political party strength in California
- Political party strength in U.S. states
- United States House of Representatives elections, 1908
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.