Montréal-la-Cluse
Montréal-la-Cluse is a commune in the Ain department in eastern France. It is located in the historical region of Bugey and its inhabitants are known as the Montréalais.
Montréal-la-Cluse | |
---|---|
![]() The town hall in Montréal-la-Cluse | |
![]() Coat of arms | |
Location of Montréal-la-Cluse ![]() | |
![]() ![]() Montréal-la-Cluse ![]() ![]() Montréal-la-Cluse | |
Coordinates: 46°11′00″N 5°34′00″E | |
Country | France |
Region | Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes |
Department | Ain |
Arrondissement | Nantua |
Canton | Nantua |
Intercommunality | Oyonnax |
Government | |
• Mayor (2020–2026) | Patrick Dufour |
Area 1 | 12.83 km2 (4.95 sq mi) |
Population (2017-01-01)[1] | 3,435 |
• Density | 270/km2 (690/sq mi) |
Time zone | UTC+01:00 (CET) |
• Summer (DST) | UTC+02:00 (CEST) |
INSEE/Postal code | 01265 /01460 |
1 French Land Register data, which excludes lakes, ponds, glaciers > 1 km2 (0.386 sq mi or 247 acres) and river estuaries. |
Transport
The town is served by the Haut Bougey railway line and by a branch line to Oyonnax.
Population
Year | Pop. | ±% |
---|---|---|
1793 | 645 | — |
1800 | 627 | −2.8% |
1806 | 802 | +27.9% |
1821 | 815 | +1.6% |
1831 | 773 | −5.2% |
1836 | 826 | +6.9% |
1841 | 824 | −0.2% |
1846 | 843 | +2.3% |
1851 | 844 | +0.1% |
1856 | 941 | +11.5% |
1861 | 1,008 | +7.1% |
1866 | 1,064 | +5.6% |
1872 | 1,111 | +4.4% |
1876 | 1,195 | +7.6% |
1881 | 1,148 | −3.9% |
1886 | 1,083 | −5.7% |
1891 | 1,101 | +1.7% |
1896 | 1,153 | +4.7% |
1901 | 1,129 | −2.1% |
1906 | 1,045 | −7.4% |
1911 | 966 | −7.6% |
1921 | 958 | −0.8% |
1926 | 1,062 | +10.9% |
1931 | 1,205 | +13.5% |
1936 | 1,202 | −0.2% |
1946 | 1,213 | +0.9% |
1954 | 1,404 | +15.7% |
1962 | 1,640 | +16.8% |
1968 | 1,926 | +17.4% |
1975 | 2,560 | +32.9% |
1982 | 3,042 | +18.8% |
1990 | 3,496 | +14.9% |
1999 | 3,652 | +4.5% |
2008 | 3,529 | −3.4% |
gollark: You probably can't verify "actual-person-ness" without some sort of centralized authority... unless you have some kind of convoluted web of trust mechanism but I'm sure that could be abused horribly.
gollark: Centralized bad.
gollark: Yes, exactly.
gollark: What people would *like*, I suppose, is "each actual person gets some fixed amount of coins per day", but there's no way to enforce that cryptographically.
gollark: Yes, I agree, although the alternative seems to be pretty much be "burn electricity and computing power for new stuff".
See also
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.