Villiersfaux
Villiersfaux is a commune in the Loir-et-Cher department in central France.
Villiersfaux | |
---|---|
Commune | |
Town hall | |
![]() Coat of arms | |
Location of Villiersfaux ![]() | |
![]() ![]() Villiersfaux ![]() ![]() Villiersfaux | |
Coordinates: 47°45′01″N 0°59′20″E | |
Country | France |
Region | Centre-Val de Loire |
Department | Loir-et-Cher |
Arrondissement | Vendôme |
Canton | Montoire-sur-le-Loir |
Intercommunality | Vendômois Rural |
Government | |
• Mayor (2014–2010) | Syvlie Norguet |
Area 1 | 7.22 km2 (2.79 sq mi) |
Population (2017-01-01)[1] | 255 |
• Density | 35/km2 (91/sq mi) |
Time zone | UTC+01:00 (CET) |
• Summer (DST) | UTC+02:00 (CEST) |
INSEE/Postal code | 41293 /41100 |
Elevation | 85–134 m (279–440 ft) (avg. 124 m or 407 ft) |
1 French Land Register data, which excludes lakes, ponds, glaciers > 1 km2 (0.386 sq mi or 247 acres) and river estuaries. |
Population
Year | Pop. | ±% |
---|---|---|
1793 | 197 | — |
1806 | 183 | −7.1% |
1821 | 192 | +4.9% |
1831 | 201 | +4.7% |
1841 | 197 | −2.0% |
1851 | 218 | +10.7% |
1861 | 227 | +4.1% |
1872 | 225 | −0.9% |
1881 | 232 | +3.1% |
1891 | 240 | +3.4% |
1901 | 220 | −8.3% |
1911 | 211 | −4.1% |
1921 | 183 | −13.3% |
1931 | 178 | −2.7% |
1946 | 189 | +6.2% |
1954 | 176 | −6.9% |
1962 | 206 | +17.0% |
1968 | 176 | −14.6% |
1976 | 166 | −5.7% |
1982 | 184 | +10.8% |
1990 | 215 | +16.8% |
1999 | 224 | +4.2% |
2004 | 233 | +4.0% |
2015 | 263 | +12.9% |
gollark: Immediately undergo exponentiation modulo 7, then.
gollark: I do not understand that sentence ("The alternative is work a political method for political reason.") and it is not pizza, I have had no commercial relations with pizza companies, I am not paid to subliminally advertise pizza, etc.
gollark: I guess maybe in politics/economics/sociology the alternative is something like "lean on human intuition" or "make the correct behaviour magically resolve from self-interest". Not sure how well those actually work.
gollark: - the replication crisis does exist, but it's not like *every paper* has a 50% chance of being wrong - it's mostly in some fields and you can generally estimate which things won't replicate fairly well without much specialized knowledge- science™ agrees on lots of things, just not some highly politicized things- you *can* do RCTs and correlation studies and such, which they seem to be ignoring- some objectivity is better than none- sure, much of pop science is not great, but that doesn't invalidate... all science- they complain about running things based on "trial and error and guesswork", but then don't offer any alternative
gollark: The alternative to basing things on science, I mean. The obvious alternative seems to basically just be guessing?
See also
![]() |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Villiersfaux. |
- "Populations légales 2017". INSEE. Retrieved 6 January 2020.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.