Mur-de-Sologne
Mur-de-Sologne is a commune in the Loir-et-Cher department of central France.
Mur-de-Sologne | |
---|---|
![]() Town hall | |
Location of Mur-de-Sologne ![]() | |
![]() ![]() Mur-de-Sologne ![]() ![]() Mur-de-Sologne | |
Coordinates: 47°24′48″N 1°36′33″E | |
Country | France |
Region | Centre-Val de Loire |
Department | Loir-et-Cher |
Arrondissement | Romorantin-Lanthenay |
Canton | Selles-sur-Cher |
Intercommunality | Cher - Sologne |
Government | |
• Mayor (2014–2020) | Yves Pothet |
Area 1 | 50.5 km2 (19.5 sq mi) |
Population (2017-01-01)[1] | 1,519 |
• Density | 30/km2 (78/sq mi) |
Time zone | UTC+01:00 (CET) |
• Summer (DST) | UTC+02:00 (CEST) |
INSEE/Postal code | 41157 /41230 |
Elevation | 88–131 m (289–430 ft) (avg. 113 m or 371 ft) |
1 French Land Register data, which excludes lakes, ponds, glaciers > 1 km2 (0.386 sq mi or 247 acres) and river estuaries. |
Population
Year | Pop. | ±% |
---|---|---|
1793 | 825 | — |
1806 | 830 | +0.6% |
1821 | 830 | +0.0% |
1831 | 841 | +1.3% |
1841 | 843 | +0.2% |
1851 | 813 | −3.6% |
1861 | 855 | +5.2% |
1872 | 932 | +9.0% |
1881 | 1,006 | +7.9% |
1891 | 1,120 | +11.3% |
1901 | 1,215 | +8.5% |
1911 | 1,408 | +15.9% |
1921 | 1,201 | −14.7% |
1931 | 114 | −90.5% |
1946 | 1,105 | +869.3% |
1954 | 1,025 | −7.2% |
1962 | 1,022 | −0.3% |
1968 | 925 | −9.5% |
1975 | 1,017 | +9.9% |
1982 | 1,102 | +8.4% |
1990 | 1,054 | −4.4% |
1999 | 1,197 | +13.6% |
2005 | 1,269 | +6.0% |
2014 | 1,505 | +18.6% |
gollark: Immediately undergo exponentiation modulo 7, then.
gollark: I do not understand that sentence ("The alternative is work a political method for political reason.") and it is not pizza, I have had no commercial relations with pizza companies, I am not paid to subliminally advertise pizza, etc.
gollark: I guess maybe in politics/economics/sociology the alternative is something like "lean on human intuition" or "make the correct behaviour magically resolve from self-interest". Not sure how well those actually work.
gollark: - the replication crisis does exist, but it's not like *every paper* has a 50% chance of being wrong - it's mostly in some fields and you can generally estimate which things won't replicate fairly well without much specialized knowledge- science™ agrees on lots of things, just not some highly politicized things- you *can* do RCTs and correlation studies and such, which they seem to be ignoring- some objectivity is better than none- sure, much of pop science is not great, but that doesn't invalidate... all science- they complain about running things based on "trial and error and guesswork", but then don't offer any alternative
gollark: The alternative to basing things on science, I mean. The obvious alternative seems to basically just be guessing?
References
- "Populations légales 2017". INSEE. Retrieved 6 January 2020.
![]() |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Mur-de-Sologne. |
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.