Space law

Space law is the body of law governing space-related activities, encompassing both international and domestic agreements, rules, and principles.[1] Parameters of space law include space exploration, liability for damage, weapons use, rescue efforts, environmental preservation, information sharing, new technologies, and ethics.[2] Other fields of law, such as administrative law, intellectual property law, arms control law, insurance law, environmental law, criminal law, and commercial law, are also integrated within space law.[3]

Hubble Deep Field (full mosaic) released by NASA on January 15, 1996.

The origins of space law date back to 1919, with international law recognizing each country's sovereignty over the airspace directly above their territory, later reinforced at the Chicago Convention in 1944.[4][5] The onset of domestic space programs during the Cold War propelled the official creation of international space policy (i.e. the International Geophysical Year) initiated by the International Council of Scientific Unions. The Soviet Union's 1957 launch of the world's first artificial satellite, Sputnik 1, directly spurred the United States Congress to pass the Space Act, thus creating the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).[3][6] Because space exploration required crossing transnational boundaries, it was during this era where space law became a field independent from traditional aerospace law.[5]

Since the Cold War, the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (the "Outer Space Treaty") and the International Telecommunications Union have served as the constitutional legal framework and set of principles and procedures constituting space law.[7][8] Further, the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS), along with its Legal and Scientific and Technical Subcommittees, are responsible for debating issues of international space law and policy. The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) serves as the secretariat of the Committee and is promoting Access to Space for All through a wide range of conferences and capacity-building programs.[9] Challenges that space law will continue to face in the future are fourfold—spanning across dimensions of domestic compliance, international cooperation, ethics, and the advent of scientific innovations.[3][10][11] Furthermore, specific guidelines on the definition of airspace have yet to be universally determined.[3]

Early developments

At Caltech in 1942 Theodore von Kármán and other rocket scientists banded together to form Aerojet rocket company with the help of lawyer Andrew G. Haley. To toast the new corporation, Kármán said, "Now, Andy, we will make the rockets—you must make the corporation and obtain the money. Later on you will have to see that we behave well in outer space. ... After all, we are the scientists but you are the lawyer, and you must tell us how to behave ourselves according to law and to safeguard our innocence."[12] Indeed, twenty years later Haley published the fundamental textbook, Space Law and Government.[13]

Beginning in 1957 with the Space Race, nations began discussing systems to ensure the peaceful use of outer space.[14][15] Bilateral discussions between the United States and USSR in 1958 resulted in the presentation of issues to the UN for debate.[14][16][17] In 1959, the UN created the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).[18] COPUOS in turn created two subcommittees, the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee and the Legal Subcommittee. The COPUOS Legal Subcommittee has been a primary forum for discussion and negotiation of international agreements relating to outer space.

In 1960 the International Astronautical Congress met in Stockholm and heard several submissions including a survey of legal opinion on extraterrestrial jurisdiction by Andrew G. Haley.[19]

General Assembly Resolutions 1721 (XVI) and 1802 (XVII), both titled "International Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space", and Resolution 1962 (XVIII), or a "Declaration of Legal Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space" were passed unanimously. These basic principles formed the foundation of the 1963 Outer Space Treaty.[20]

International treaties

Five international treaties have been negotiated and drafted in the COPUOS:

  • The 1967 Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (the "Outer Space Treaty").
  • The 1968 Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space (the "Rescue Agreement").
  • The 1972 Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects (the "Liability Convention").
  • The 1975 Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space (the "Registration Convention").
  • The 1979 Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (the "Moon Treaty").

The Outer Space Treaty is the most widely adopted treaty, with 104 parties.[21] The rescue agreement, the liability convention and the registration convention all elaborate on provisions of the outer space treaty. UN delegates apparently intended that the moon treaty serve as a new comprehensive treaty which would supersede or supplement the outer space treaty, most notably by elaborating upon the outer space treaty's provisions regarding resource appropriation and prohibition of territorial sovereignty.[22] The moon treaty has only 17 parties[21] however, and many consider it to be a failed treaty due to its limited acceptance.[23] India is the only nation that has both signed the moon treaty and declared itself interested in going to the moon. India has not ratified the treaty; an analysis of India's treaty law is required to understand how this affects India legally.[24]

In addition, the 1963 Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space, and Under Water ("Partial Test Ban Treaty") banned the testing of nuclear weapons in outer space.

1998 ISS agreement

In addition to the international treaties that have been negotiated at the United Nations, the nations participating in the International Space Station have entered into the 1998 Agreement among the governments of Canada, Member States of the European Space Agency, Japan, Russian Federation, and the United States concerning cooperation on the Civil International Space Station.[25] This agreement provides, among other things, that NASA is the lead agency in coordinating the member states' contributions to and activities on the space station, and that each nation has jurisdiction over its own module(s). The agreement also provides for protection of intellectual property and procedures for criminal prosecution. This agreement may very well serve as a model for future agreements regarding international cooperation in facilities on the Moon and Mars, where the first off-world colonies and scientific/industrial bases are likely to be established.[26]

International principles and declarations

The five treaties and agreements of international space law cover "non-appropriation of outer space by any one country, arms control, the freedom of exploration, liability for damage caused by space objects, the safety and rescue of spacecraft and astronauts, the prevention of harmful interference with space activities and the environment, the notification and registration of space activities, scientific investigation and the exploitation of natural resources in outer space and the settlement of disputes".[27]

The United Nations General Assembly adopted five declarations and legal principles which encourage exercising the international laws, as well as unified communication between countries. The five declarations and principles are:[27]

  • The Declaration of Legal Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Uses of Outer Space (1963)
All space exploration will be done with good intentions and is equally open to all States that comply with international law. No one nation may claim ownership of outer space or any celestial body. Activities carried out in space must abide by the international law and the nations undergoing these said activities must accept responsibility for the governmental or non-governmental agency involved. Objects launched into space are subject to their nation of belonging, including people. Objects, parts, and components discovered outside the jurisdiction of a nation will be returned upon identification. If a nation launches an object into space, they are responsible for any damages that occur internationally.
  • Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (1979)
    Apollo 15 Moon landing. Jul 26, 1971 – Aug 7, 1971
    The agreement exists to promote the exploration of outer space but to keep the moon and other celestial bodies in pristine conditions for the common heritage of man, meaning that no nation may claim sovereignty over any part of space. All countries should have equal rights to conduct research on the moon or other celestial bodies. Weapons of mass destruction of any kind including nuclear and bases built for military purposes are specifically banned by the treaty.[28] The United Nations resolution also states that all State Parties may conduct their enterprises below the surface of the moon or any celestial body so long as efforts are made to protect it from contamination. All activities in space are required to be attached to a nation and any damages to other nations equipment or facilities caused by another party must be repaid in full to that nation. Any discovery of a dangerous hazard such as an area that is radioactive must notify the United Nations Secretary General and the greater international scientific community immediately.
All missions in space lasting longer than 60 days must notify the UN Secretary General and the greater scientific community every 30 days of progress. Any samples that are collected from space must be made available at earliest convenience to the scientific community. The agreement does not include meteorites that fall to earth by natural means.[29] Currently not a single nation that conducts its own missions in space has ratified the agreement.[30] This likely signifies that the 'Moon Treaty is likely a failed treaty because none of the nations that actually go into space signed or ratified the agreement.[31]
  • The Principles Governing the Use by States of Artificial Earth Satellites for International Direct Television Broadcasting (1982)
Activities of this nature must be transpired in accordance with the sovereign rights of States. Said activities should "promote the free dissemination and mutual exchange of information and knowledge in cultural and scientific fields, assist in educational, social and economic development, particularly in the developing countries, enhance the qualities of life of all peoples and provide recreation with due respect to the political and cultural integrity of States". All States have equal rights to pursue these activities and must maintain responsibility for anything carried out under their boundaries of authority. States planning activities need to contact the Secretary-General of the United Nations with details of the undergoing activities.
  • The Principles Relating to Remote Sensing of the Earth from Outer Space (1986)
Fifteen principles are stated under this category. The basic understanding comes from these descriptions given by the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs:
(a) The term "remote sensing" means the sensing of the Earth's surface from space by making use of the properties of electromagnetic waves emitted, reflected or :diffracted by the sensed objects, for the purpose of improving natural resources management, land use and the protection of the environment;
(b) The term "primary data" means those raw data that are acquired by remote sensors borne by a space object and that are transmitted or delivered to the ground :from space by telemetry in the form of electromagnetic signals, by photographic film, magnetic tape or any other means;
(c) The term "processed data" means the products resulting from the processing of the primary data, needed to make such data usable;
(d) The term "analysed information" means the information resulting from the interpretation of processed data, inputs of data and knowledge from other sources;
(e) The term "remote sensing activities" means the operation of remote sensing space systems, primary data collection and storage stations, and activities in :processing, interpreting and disseminating the processed data.[32]
  • The Principles Relevant to the Use of Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space (1992)
"States launching space objects with nuclear power sources on board shall endeavour to protect individuals, populations and the biosphere against radiological hazards. The design and use of space objects with nuclear power sources on board shall ensure, with a high degree of confidence, that the hazards, in foreseeable operational or accidental circumstances, are kept below acceptable levels. ..."
  • The Declaration on International Cooperation in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space for the Benefit and in the Interest of All States, Taking into Particular Account the Needs of Developing Countries (1996)
"States are free to determine all aspects of their participation in international cooperation in the exploration and use of outer space on an equitable and mutually acceptable basis. All States, particularly those with relevant space capabilities and with programmes for the exploration and use of outer space, should contribute to promoting and fostering international cooperation on an equitable and mutually acceptable basis. In this context, particular attention should be given to the benefit for and the interests of developing countries and countries with incipient space programmes stemming from such international cooperation conducted with countries with more advanced space capabilities. International cooperation should be conducted in the modes that are considered most effective and appropriate by the countries concerned, including, inter alia, governmental and non-governmental; commercial and non-commercial; global, multilateral, regional or bilateral; and international cooperation among countries in all levels of development."

Consensus

The United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space and its Scientific and Technical and Legal Subcommittees operate on the basis of consensus, i.e. all delegations from member States must agree on any matter, be it treaty language before it can be included in the final version of a treaty or new items on Committee/Subcommittee's agendas. One reason that the U.N. space treaties lack definitions and are unclear in other respects, is that it is easier to achieve consensus when language and terms are vague. In recent years, the Legal Subcommittee has been unable to achieve consensus on discussion of a new comprehensive space agreement (the idea of which, though, was proposed just by a few member States). It is also unlikely that the Subcommittee will be able to agree to amend the Outer Space Treaty in the foreseeable future. Many space faring nations seem to believe that discussing a new space agreement or amendment of the Outer Space Treaty would be futile and time-consuming, because entrenched differences regarding resource appropriation, property rights and other issues relating to commercial activity make consensus unlikely.

National law

Space law also encompasses national laws, and many countries have passed national space legislation in recent years. The Outer Space Treaty gives responsibility for regulating space activities, including both government and private sector, to the individual countries where the activity is taking place. If a national of, or an organization incorporated in one country launches a spacecraft in a different country, interpretations differ as to whether the home country or the launching country has jurisdiction.[33]

The Outer Space Treaty also incorporates the UN Charter by reference, and requires parties to ensure that activities are conducted in accordance with other forms of international law such as customary international law (the custom and practice of states).

The advent of commercial activities like space mining, space tourism, private exploration, and the development of many commercial spaceports, is leading many countries to consider how to regulate private space activities.[34] The challenge is to regulate these activities in a manner that does not hinder or preclude investment, while still ensuring that commercial activities comply with international law. The developing nations are concerned that the spacefaring nations will monopolize space resources. Royalties paid to developing countries is one reason the United States has not ratified the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and why some oppose applying the same principles to outer space.[35]

Several nations have recently updated their statutory space law, among them Luxembourg in 2017,[36] the United States in 2015,[37] and Japan, with the Basic Space Law in 2008.[38] Due to the expansion of the domain of space research and allied activities, in India, the Draft Space Activities Bill was introduced in the year 2017.[39]

Geostationary orbit allocation
Source: Own work, Earth bitmap is File:North_pole_february_ice-pack_1978-2002.png by Geo Swan. Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. (No changes made.)

Allocative Limitations

Objects in geostationary orbits remain stationary over a point on the earth due to gravity. There are numerous advantages in being able to use these orbits, mostly due to the unique ability to send radio frequencies to and from satellites to collect data and send signals to various locations. The United Nations Committee on Peaceful Uses of Outer Space has approved seven nonmilitary uses for these orbits: communications, meteorology, earth resources and environment, navigation and aircraft control, testing of new systems, astronomy, and data relay.[40] The requirement to space these satellites apart means that there is a limited number of orbital "slots" available, thus only a limited number of satellites can be placed in geostationary orbit. This has led to conflict between different countries wishing access to the same orbital slots (countries at the same longitude but differing latitudes). These disputes are addressed through the ITU allocation mechanism.[41]

Countries located at the Earth's equator have also asserted their legal claim to control the use of space above their territory,[42] notably in 1976, when many countries located at the Earth's equator created the Bogota Declaration, in which they asserted their legal claim to control the use of space above their territory.[43]

Political Controversy

Future developments using geostationary orbits may include an expansion of services in telecommunication, broadcasting, and meteorology.[11] As a result, uses for geostationary orbits may stir political controversy. For example, broadcasting and telecommunication services of satellites orbiting above Earth from certain nations may accidentally "spill over" into other nations' territory. This may prompt conflict with nations that wish to restrict access to information and communication.[40] Current and future political and legal concerns allocation may pose may be addressed by international legislatures, such as the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space and the International Telecommunication Union.[11]

Ethics

Ethics can be defined as "the task of being human". In space law, ethics extend to topics regarding space exploration, space tourism, space ownership, the militarization of space, environmental protection, and distinguishing the boundaries of space itself.[10]

Commercial Use

Early discussions regarding space ethics revolved around whether or not the space frontier should be available for use, gaining prominence at the time of the Soviet Union and United States' Space Race.[44] In 1967, the "Outer Space Treaty" dictated that all nations in compliance with international regulation are permitted to exploit space.[8] As a result, the commercial use of space is open to exploitation by public and private entities, especially in relation to mining and space tourism.[45] This principle has been the subject of controversy, particularly by those in favor of environmental protection, sustainability, and conservation.[46]

Environmental Protection

More recent discussions focus on the need for the international community to draft and institute a code of space ethics to prevent the destruction of the space environment.[47] Furthermore, the advancement of life in space pertain to questions related to the ethics of biocentrism and anthropocentrism, or in other words, determining how much value we place in all living things versus human beings specifically.[48] Currently, researchers in the bioengineering field are working towards contamination control measures integrated into spacecrafts to protect both space and earth's biosphere.[46]

Defining "space"

Many questions arise from the difficulty of defining the term "space". Scholars not only debate its geographical definition (i.e. upper and lower limits), but also whether or not it also encompasses various objects within it (i.e. celestial objects, human beings, man-made devices). Lower limits are generally estimated to be about 50 kilometers. More difficulties arise trying to define the upper bounds of "space", as it would require more inquiry into the nature of the universe and the role of Earth as a planet.[10]

Future developments

Future coordination and cooperation

International coordination and cooperation is facilitated by the growing inter-agency International Space Exploration Coordination Group and planned for the Lunar Gateway space station, emulating the cooperation for the ISS.

Exploitation
American Society of International Law Space Interest Group 2014 Board meeting

While this field of the law is still in its infancy, it is in an era of rapid change and development. Arguably the resources of space are infinite. If commercial space transportation becomes widely available, with substantially lower launch costs, then all countries will be able to directly reap the benefits of space resources. In that situation, it seems likely that consensus will be much easier to achieve with respect to commercial development and human settlement of outer space. High costs are not the only factor preventing the economic exploitation of space: it is argued that space should be considered as a pristine environment worthy of protection and conservation, and that the legal regime for space should further protect it from being used as a resource for Earth's needs.[49][50] Debate is also focused on whether space should continue to be legally defined as part of the "common heritage of man", and therefore unavailable for national claims, or whether its legal definition should be changed to allow private property in space.[49][51][52]

As of 2013, NASA's plans to capture an asteroid by 2021 has raised questions about how space law would be applied in practice.[53]

In 2016, the nation of Luxembourg has set out a formal legal framework which ensures that private companies engaged in mining resources in space have rights to those resources.[54]

Michael Dodge, of Long Beach, Mississippi, was the first law school graduate to receive a space law certificate in the United States.[55][56] Dodge graduated from the National Center for Remote Sensing, Air and Space Law at the University of Mississippi School of Law in 2008.[57][58] He is now an assistant professor in the Department of Space Studies at the University of North Dakota.[59]

There is a growing emphasis on space law in academia. Since 1951, the McGill Faculty of Law in Montreal, Canada hosts the Institute of Air and Space Law, and offers an LL.M. in Air and Space law.[60] The University of Mississippi School of Law publishes the world's only law journal devoted to space law, the Journal of Space Law. The University of Mississippi School of Law is also the only ABA accredited law school in the world to offer a JD Concentration in Air and Space Law.[61]. Over the last decade, other universities have begun to offer specialized courses and programs in the USA, UK, France, the Netherlands, and Australia.[62][63][64][65]

In September 2012, the Space Law Society (SLS) at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law was established.[66] A legal resources team united in Maryland, a "Space Science State", with Jorge Rodriguez, Lee Sampson, Patrick Gardiner, Lyra Correa and Juliana Neelbauer as SLS founding members.[67] In 2014, students at American University Washington College of Law founded the school's Space Law Society, with the help of Pamela L. Meredith, space lawyer and adjunct professor of Satellite Communications and Space Law.[68][69]

Efforts to codify the legal regime are mostly represented in the Manual on International Law Applicable to Military Uses of Outer Space (MILAMOS) and the Woomera Manual.[70][71] Like the San Remo and Tallinn Manuals, the goal is to clarify the law as it relates to outer space.

gollark: I rebound my useless Win key as compose, personally. It's very convenient.
gollark: Not really with sufficiently advanced AI for the robots.
gollark: You don't need to go around having actual humans for everything though, that's the thing.
gollark: So you want to also do space farming? That involves a whole lot of shipping materials around and would be pretty expensive.
gollark: They'll probably lean heavily on automation since shipping up food and physical crew and whatnot would be expensive.

See also

References
  1. "What Is Space Law?". Legal Career Path.
  2. "Space Law". United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs.
  3. Gabrynowicz, Joanne Irene. "Space law: Its Cold War origins and challenges in the era of globalization". Suffolk University Law Review – via Law Journal Library.
  4. Finch, Michael J. "Limited Space: Allocating the Geostationary Orbit". HeinOnline.
  5. "Space Law 101: An Introduction to Space Law". www.americanbar.org. Retrieved 2018-12-03.
  6. "Sputnik". history.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2018-12-01.
  7. robert.wickramatunga. "The Outer Space Treaty". www.unoosa.org. Retrieved 2018-12-04.
  8. Henri, Yvon. "Orbit Spectrum Allocation Procedures ITU Registration Mechanism" (PDF). International Telecommunications Union.
  9. "Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space and its Subcommittees". United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs.
  10. Jacques, Arnould (2011-09-15). Icarus' Second Chance: The Basis and Perspectives of Space Ethics. ISBN 9783709107126.
  11. Gorove, Stephen (1979). "The Geostationary Orbit: Issues of Law and Policy". The American Journal of International Law. 73 (3): 444–461. doi:10.2307/2201144. JSTOR 2201144.
  12. Andrew G. Haley (1963) Space Law and Government, page xii, Appleton-Century-Crofts
  13. Forewords for Space Law and Government were contributed by Lyndon B. Johnson, Carl Albert, and George P. Miller. The book was reviewed by American Journal of Legal History, Southern California Law Review, Duke Law Journal, and Georgetown Law Journal.
  14. inesap.org Archived 2008-03-18 at the Wayback Machine Peaceful Uses of Outer Space and International Law.
  15. UN website UN Resolution 1148 (XII). Archived August 14, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  16. Nagendra Singh; Edward MacWhinney (1989). Nuclear Weapons and Contemporary International Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 289. ISBN 978-90-247-3637-9.
  17. UN website UN Resolution 1348 (XIII). Archived November 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine
  18. "United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space". United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs.
  19. Andrew G. Haley (1961) "Survey of Legal Opinion on Extraterrestrial Jurisdiction", in proceedings of the eleventh International Astronautical Congress, Stockholm 1960, pp 37–92, Springer ISBN 978-3-662-37770-3
  20. Gotlieb, A.E. (1969). "Direct Satellite Broadcasting: A Case Study in the Development of the Law of Space Communications". The Canadian Yearbook of International Law 1969. 7: 33–60. doi:10.1017/S0069005800011826.
  21. http://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/spacelaw/treatystatus/AC105_C2_2016_CRP03E.pdf
  22. "Journal of Space Law" (PDF). Journal of Space Law. 2. 1974.
  23. "Space Law".
  24. Space Station Agreement
  25. "Space Law and Space Resources".
  26. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. "United Nations Treaties and Principles on Space Law". unoosa.org. Retrieved 23 February 2019.
  27. "Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. 11 July 1984. Retrieved 23 February 2019.
  28. "Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies" (PDF). United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. 1979. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 January 2019.
  29. "Status of international agreements relating to activities in outer space as at 1 January 2008" (PDF). United Nations Treaties and Principles on Outer Space and Related General Assembly Resolutions. 2009.
  30. Listner, Michael (24 October 2011). "The Space Review: The Moon Treaty: failed international law or waiting in the shadows?". www.thespacereview.com. Retrieved 23 February 2019.
  31. "United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs". Archived from the original on 16 December 2018.
  32. Dvorsky, George. "California Startup Accused of Launching Unauthorized Satellites into Orbit: Report [Updated]". gizmodo.com. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
  33. "Space Law".
  34. Wong, Kristina. "Rumsfeld still opposes Law of Sea Treaty." The Washington Times, June 14, 2012.
  35. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/16/luxembourg-vies-to-become-the-silicon-valley-of-asteroid-mining.html
  36. Keehn, Jeremy (26 July 2018). "Space is about to get a whole lot more accessible—and potentially profitable". Businessweek. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  37. An overview of Japan's space activities, 14 August 2018.
  38. Kaustubh Shailesh Bam, Liability under the draft space activities Bill, 2017: An analysis, The Lex-Warrier: Online Law Journal (2018) 8, pp. 395 – 400, ISSN (O): 2319-8338.
  39. Finch, Micheal J. "Limited Space: Allocating the Geostationary Orbit". Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business. 7: 16 – via Scholarly Commons.
  41. esa. "Geostationary Orbit. Legal issues". European Space Agency.
  42. Thompson, J. (1996) Space for rent: the International Telecommunications Union, space law, and orbit/spectrum leasing, Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 62, 279–311
  43. Pons, Walter (1960). Sthet uns der Himmel offen?. Krausskopf.
  44. Freeland, Steven. "Up, up...and Back: The Emergence of Space Tourism and Its Impact on the International Law of Outer Space". Chicago Journal of International Law – via HeinOnline.
  45. Rummel, John D. (2001-02-27). "Planetary exploration in the time of astrobiology: Protecting against biological contamination". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 98 (5): 2128–2131. doi:10.1073/pnas.061021398. ISSN 1091-6490. PMC 33387. PMID 11226203.
  46. Jankowitsch, Peter (2003). "Space Ethics and Protection of the Space Environment". Space Policy. 19 (1): 47–52. Bibcode:2003SpPol..19...47W. doi:10.1016/S0265-9646(02)00064-4.
  47. Mautner, Michael N. (2009). "Life-Centered Ethics, and the Human Future in Space". Bioethics. 23 (8): 433–440. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00688.x. PMID 19077128.
  48. Billings, L. (2006) To the Moon, Mars, and beyond: culture, law, and ethics in space-faring societies, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26(5), 430–437
  49. Lee, K. (1994) Awe and humility: intrinsic value in nature – beyond an earthbound environmental ethics, in: Attfield, R. & Belsey, A. Philosophy and the Natural Environment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 89–101
  50. Fountain, L. (2003). Creating the Momentum in Space: Ending the Paralysis Produced by the "Common Heritage of Mankind" Doctrine, Connecticut Law Review, 35(4), 1753–1787.
  51. Pop, Virgiliu (2009). Who Owns the Moon?: Extraterrestrial Aspects of Land and Mineral Resources Ownership. Space Regulations Library. Springer. ISBN 978-1-4020-9134-6.
  52. David, Leonard (August 30, 2013). "Is NASA's Plan to Lasso an Asteroid Really Legal?". Space.com. Retrieved February 20, 2014.
  53. "Space Resources Initiative of Luxembourg". 2016-11-03.
  54. "UM space law only of its kind". The Daily Mississippian.
  55. "Beyond the blue yonder". Deccan Herald. Archived from the original on 2009-05-07.
  56. "First Space Lawyer Graduates". Space.com.
  57. "Law Graduation Includes First-Time Certificate in Space Law".
  58. "Michael Dodge, J.D., LL.M."
  59. "About the Institute of Air and Space Law".
  60. https://law.olemiss.edu/academics-programs/llm/. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  61. "Master of Laws (LL.M.) Program in Air and Space Law | the University of Mississippi School of Law". Archived from the original on 2013-01-25.
  62. "A Space Odyssey to the University of Sunderland".
  63. "Space, Cyber, and Telecommunications Law | University of Nebraska–Lincoln". Spaceandtelecomlaw.unl.edu. Retrieved 2013-03-12.
  64. "Partenaires M2 Droit des Activités Spatiales et des Télécommunications & IDEST – IDEST – Institut du Droit de l'Espace et des Télécoms". Idest-paris.org. Archived from the original on 2014-02-27. Retrieved 2013-03-12.
  65. P.J. Blount. "New Space Law Society | Res Communis". Rescommunis.olemiss.edu. Archived from the original on 2015-01-19. Retrieved 2013-03-12.
  66. http://www.choosemaryland.org/industry/documents/spacefullreport.pdf
  67. "WCL Space Law".
  68. Jonathon H Foglia. "Pamela L. Meredith".
  69. "Manual on International Law Applicable to Military Uses of Outer Space". Manual on International Law Applicable to Military Uses of Outer Space. Retrieved 2019-09-02.
  70. "The Woomera Manual | University of Adelaide". law.adelaide.edu.au. Retrieved 2019-09-02.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.