Freedom of religion in India

Freedom of religion in India is a fundamental right guaranteed by Article 25-28 of the Constitution of India.[1] Modern India came into existence in 1947 and the Indian constitution's preamble was amended in 1976 to state that India is a secular state.[2] However, in S.R Bommai v. Union of India, Supreme Court of India ruled that India was already a secular state from the time it adopted its constitution, what actually was done through this amendment is to state explicitly what was earlier contained implicitly under article 25 to 28.[3] Every citizen of India has a right to practice and promote their religion peacefully. However, there have been numerous incidents of religious intolerance that resulted in riots and violence, notably, the 1984 Anti-Sikh Massacre in Delhi, 1990 Anti-Hindu riots in Kashmir, 2002 Gujarat Riots and the 2008 Anti-Christian riots in Odisha. Some perpetrators of the 1984 Anti-Sikh Massacre in Delhi have not been brought to justice despite widespread condemnation.[4][5][6][7]

India
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
India
 India portal

India is one of the most diverse nations in terms of religion, it being the birthplace of four major world religions: Jainism, Hinduism, Buddhism and Sikhism. Even though Hindus form close to 80 percent of the population, India also has region-specific religious practices: for instance, Jammu and Kashmir has a Muslim majority, Punjab has a Sikh majority, Nagaland, Meghalaya and Mizoram have Christian majorities and the Indian Himalayan States such as Sikkim and Ladakh, Arunachal Pradesh and the state of Maharashtra and the Darjeeling District of West Bengal have large concentrations of Buddhist population. The country has significant Muslim, Sikh, Christian, Buddhist, Jain and Zoroastrian populations. Islam is the largest minority religion in India, and the Indian Muslims form the third largest Muslim population in the world, accounting for over 14 percent of the nation's population.

Rajni Kothari, founder of the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies has written, "India is a country built on the foundations of a civilisation that is fundamentally tolerant."[8]

History

Tradition of religious freedom

The plural nature of Indian society in the 3rd century BC was encapsulated in an inscription of Ashoka:

King Piyadasi (Ashoka) dear to the Gods, honours all sects, the ascetics (hermits) or those who dwell at home, he honours them with charity and in other ways. But the King, dear to the Gods, attributes less importance to this charity and these honours than to the vow of seeing the reign of virtues, which constitutes the essential part of them. For all these virtues there is a common source, modesty of speech. That is to say, One must not exalt one’s creed discrediting all others, nor must one degrade these others Without legitimate reasons. One must, on the contrary, render to other creeds the honour befitting them.

Emperor Kharvela (born in the family of Rajarshi Vasu) declares himself in his inscription (approximately 2nd century BCE):[9]

sava pasa-nd-a-puujako, sava devaayatan-sanskaarako

I am worshipper of all sects, restorer of all shrines.

Kharvela's self-description must be contrasted with other rulers around the world, who took pride in calling themselves "but-shikan" or "defender of the (only true) faith".

Badayuni in his Muntakhab-ut-Tawáríkh reports that the Mughal Emperor Akbar, who had established the Din-i-Ilahi faith, decreed the following in AH 1000 (1551–1552 CE):

Hindus who, when young, had from pressure become Musalmans, were allowed to go back to the faith of their fathers. No man should be interfered with on account of his religion, and every one should be allowed to change his religion, if he liked. ...People should not be molested, if they wished to build churches and prayer rooms, or idol temples, or fire temples.

The Sikh Gurus built freedom of religion in their faith to such an extent that while being a persecuted minority themselves under many Mughal rulers like Aurangzeb, Sikhs felt obliged to fight for the religious freedom of others. The sixth Guru of Sikhs, Guru Hargobind, even had a mosque built for his Muslim disciples, instead of putting them under any pressure to adopt the Sikh faith.[10] The tradition of religious freedom continued under Sikh Empire, and other Sikh Principalities where Sikh rulers commissioned several Gurdwaras, Temples and Mosques for their subjects of various faiths.

Refuge from religious persecution

India, with its traditional tolerance, has served as a refuge for groups that have encountered persecution elsewhere.

  • Jews: Jews in India were granted lands and trading rights. The oldest of the three longest-established Jewish communities in India, traders from Judea and Israel arrived in the city of Cochin, in what is now Kerala, 2,500 years ago and are now known as Cochin Jews. According to recordings by Jews, the date of the first arrival is given at 562 BC. In 68 AD, more Jews fled to Kerala to escape attacks by the Romans on Jerusalem.
  • Christians: Christianity is believed to have come to India in the 1st century through Saint Thomas who formed the Saint Thomas Christians in Kerala. Later in the 15th and 16th centuries European Missionaries brought in Christianity in places such as Goa and Mangalore. Protestant Missionaries came in 18th and 19th centuries to North-East India.
  • Parsi: The Zoroastrians from Greater Persia arrived in India fleeing from religious persecution in their native land in the 9th century. They flourished in India and in 18–19th centuries intervened on behalf of their co-religionists still in Greater Persia. They have produced India's pioneering industrialist house of Tata and one of the only two Indian Field Marshals in S. F. Manekshaw.
  • Tibetan Buddhists: Apart from sheltering Tibetan Buddhist refugees who fled their country after it was occupied by China in 1959, India is now home to the Dalai Lama, a high lama of the Gelug school of Tibetan Buddhism.
  • Baha'i: India now has world's largest Baha'i population of 4572 Baha'is,[11] who took refuge in India from religious persecution in Iran.

Religious disturbances and conflicts before 1947

Notable incidents of religious intolerance, conflicts and riots have occurred at several points in time.

  • The Goa Inquisition was carried out against the Hindu, Muslim and Jewish populations of Goa under Portuguese Rule.

Communal violence during the Partition in 1947

There were widespread riots during the Partition of India in 1947 – There was communal violence directed against Hindu & Sikh minorities in areas that became Pakistan while violence was directed against Muslim minorities in Hindu/Sikh majority areas.[The biggest massacre killing more than 10 lakh people]

Conversion history

After the advent of Islam, when religious bias against the non-Islamic sects began to get severe , Hinduism began to take on a distinctive identity. During the 14th century, Sikhism also arose and drew into its fold a number of people in Punjab. Christianity has a history that traces back to the advent of Saint Thomas the Apostle in India around 48 AD. He is said to have been followed by Bartholomew around 55 AD. It is reported that when Vasco Da Gama visited Calicut in 1498 AD, he found over 2 lakh Christians in the Kerala area.[12] The British Government in the beginning discouraged any missionary work; however, in 1837, it permitted entry of white missionaries in its territory because of the pressure from the evangelical lobby in the British parliament.

Religious conversion has sparked a lot of attention and has caused hostilities in Indian families. Though conversion resolved the pre-conversion crisis, it resulted in more troubles in the convert's life. Different kinds of hostilities were: being killed, threatened with death, fear of future troubles or being disowned by parents and friends.[13]

BJP government

Human Rights Watch stated in 2019 that dozens of vigilante killings against religious minorities in India have gone unpunished due to inertia or collusion, mostly in BJP-run states.[14] In 2020 the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom stated the BJP "allowed violence against minorities and their houses of worship to continue with impunity and also engaged in and tolerated hate speech and incitement to violence". The commission recommended India be labeled a "country of particular concern"; a dissenting member of the commission stated such a label would incorrectly place India in "a gallery of rogue nations in which it does not belong".[15]

Laws and Indian Constitution

The Preamble of the Indian Constitution has the word "secular", and articles 25 to 28 implying that the State will not discriminate, patronise or meddle in the profession of any religion.[16] However, it shields individual religions or groups by adding religious rights as fundamental rights. Article 25 says "all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion subject to public order, morality and health."[17] Further, Article 26 says that all denominations can manage their own affairs in matters of religion. All these rights are subject to be regulated by the State.[18]

The Indian version of secularism is a little bit different from what is understood in the western European countries. In the west, state and church(religion) is separate and do not intervene in each other's internal affairs. But this is not the case with India, here secularism means 'respect for all religions' and 'keeping a principled distance' from each religion. The Indian constitution permits the central government to intervene in religion but this intervention should be based on constitution only. If some tenets, principles or beliefs of any particular religion violates the constitution or the law of the land, then the Indian government is mandated to intervene and remedy the situation. Government of India has for a few times have intervened in religions historically as mandated by the constitution. The enactment of anti-untouchability act(SC/ST Act,1989) and also the recent law banning triple talaq among the Muslim community is example of this constitutionally mandated intervention. Government also intervene when women of any religion are denied opportunities or equality as gender equality is guaranteed by the Indian constitution.

Article 25 (2b) uses the term "Hindus" for all classes and sections of Hindus, Jains, Buddhists and Sikhs.[19] Sikhs and Buddhists objected to this wording that makes many Hindu personal laws applicable to them.[19] However, the same article also guarantees the right of members of the Sikh faith to bear a Kirpan.[20] Religions require no registration. The government can ban a religious organisation if it disrupts communal harmony, has been involved in terrorism or sedition, or has violated the Foreign Contributions Act. The government limits the entry of any foreign religious institution or missionary and since the 1960s, no new foreign missionaries have been accepted though long term established ones may renew their visas.[21] Many sections of the law prohibit hate speech and provide penalties for writings, illustrations, or speech that insult a particular community or religion.

Some major religious holidays like Diwali (Hindu), Christmas (Christian), Eid (Muslim) and Guru Nanak's birth anniversary (Sikh) are considered national holidays. Private schools offering religious instruction are permitted while government schools are non-religious.[22]

The government has set up the Ministry of Minority Affairs, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and the National Commission for Minorities (NCM) to investigate religious discrimination and to make recommendations for redressal to the local authorities. Though they do not have any power, local and central authorities generally follow them. These organisations have investigated numerous instances of religious tension including the implementation of "anti-conversion" bills in numerous states, the 2002 Gujarat violence against Muslims and the 2008 attacks against Christians in Orissa.[23]

For Shia Muslims, the Grand Ashura Procession In Kashmir where they mourn the martyrdom of Husayn ibn Ali has been banned by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir from the 1990s. People taking part in it are detained, and injured[24] by Jammu and Kashmir Police every year.[25] According to the government, this restriction was placed due to security reasons.[25] Local religious authorities and separatist groups condemned this action and said it is a violation of their fundamental religious rights.[26]

Post-independence state laws

The Article 25 of the Indian Constitution is a basic human right guarantee (see Articles 18 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) that cannot be subverted or misinterpreted in any manner.[27] Anti-conversion laws are promulgated on the premise that forced or induced conversions happen and need to be prevented.

A consolidation of various anti-conversion or so-called "Freedom of Religion" Laws has been done by the All Indian Christian Council.[28][29] Several Indian states passed Freedom of Religion Bills primarily to prevent people from converting to Christianity. Orissa was the first state to bring such law named as 'Orissa Freedom of Religion Act, 1967'.[30] It was followed by Madhya Pradesh in 1968 and Arunachal Pradesh in 1978.[31]:385 Catholics protested against this saying that propagation of their faith was an important part of Christianity. Both laws enacted by the Orissa and Madhya Pradesh high courts were challenged stating Article 25 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court supported the laws saying, "What is freedom for one is freedom for the other in equal measure and there can, therefore, be no such thing as a fundamental right to convert any person to one's own religion".

Chhattisgarh in 2000 and Gujarat State in 2003 passed anti-conversion laws that prohibit forced or money induced conversions.[31]:385[32][33] In July 2006, the Madhya Pradesh government passed legislation requiring people who desire to convert to a different religion to provide the government with one month's notice, or face fines and penalties.[34] In August 2006, the Chhattisgarh State Assembly passed similar legislation requiring anyone who desires to convert to another religion to give 30 days' notice to, and seek permission from, the district magistrate.[35] In February 2007, Himachal Pradesh became the first Congress Party-ruled state to adopt legislation banning illegal religious conversions.[36] It was followed by Rajasthan in 2008, but it has still not became an act. So total there are 8 states where freedom of religion bill has become an act- Odisha, Madhya Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh and Jharkand

In 2013, the Bharatiya Janata Party general secretary Venkaiah Naidu has declared that his party would bring anti-conversion laws nationwide if his party is elected to power in 2014.[31]:385 However, as of January 2018, the party does not yet have a majority in the Upper House of the Parliament. The president of party Amit Shah has challenged the opposition parties to support it in enacting such a law.[37] The US State Department has said that the recent wave of anti-conversion laws in various Indian states passed by some states is seen as gradual increase in ideological Hindu nationalism (Hindutva).[38]

The Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act of 1968

The Niyogi Committee (1954) set up by the Congress government in Madhya Pradesh alleged that Christian missionaries were creating ‘a state within a state’ and observed that the ‘philanthropic activities of Christian missionaries are a mask for proselytization.’[39] Missionary work was also opposed by the Sangh Parivar. The Madhya Pradesh Assembly rejected the Freedom of Religion Bills of 1958 and 1963. However, this bill was passed in 1968 as ‘The Freedom of Religion Act.’ The Madhya Pradesh ‘Freedom of Religion Act’ requires that a convert produce a legal affidavit that s/he was not under any pressure, force, or allurement to convert but was converting by own will and desire after evaluating the religion properly. Also according to this law, anyone who writes or speaks or sings of ‘divine displeasure’ (with an intention to induce forced conversion by means of threat) can be imprisoned for a period of up to two years and fined up to five thousand rupees.

The Orissa Freedom of Religions Act of 1967

The Orissa Freedom of Religions Act of 1967 states that “no person shall convert or attempt to convert either directly or otherwise any person from one religious faith to another by the use of force or by inducement or by any fraudulent means nor shall any person abet any such conversion.” Contravention of this law was punishable with imprisonment of up to one year and/or a fine of up to Rs 5,000. In the case of a minor, a woman, or a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste or Tribe, the punishment was up to two years of imprisonment and the limit of the fine raised to Rs. 10,000. The Orissa High Court, however, struck down the Act as ultra vires of the Constitution on the ground that the state legislature did not have the right to legislate matters of religion. The same year, the state of Madhya Pradesh also enacted the Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act as seen above. However, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, in contrary to the Orissa High Court, negated the challenge of some Christians that the Act violated their fundamental right as provided under Article 25 of the Constitution. The decisions of both the Courts were challenged before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court and reversed the decision of the Orissa High Court.[40]

The Arunachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act of 1978

The Arunachal Pradesh government enacted this Act to protect the tribals of Arunachal Pradesh from forced conversions of any kind. It reads:

3) Prohibition of forcible conversion. No person shall convert or attempt to convert, either directly or otherwise any person from indigenous faith by use of force or by inducement or any fraudulent means nor shall any person abet any such conversion. 4) Punishment of Contravention of the Provision of Section. Any person contravening the provisions contained in Section 2, shall without prejudice to any civil liability, be punishable with imprisonment to the extent of two (2) years and fine up to ten thousand (10, 000) rupees. (i) whoever converts any person from his indigenous faith to any other faith or religion either by himself performing the ceremony for such conversion as a religious priest or by taking part directly in such ceremony shall, within such period after the ceremony as may be prescribed, send an intimation to the Deputy Commissioner of the District to which the person converted belongs, of the fact of such conversion in such forms as may be prescribed.[41]

The Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Forcible Conversion of Religion Bill 2002

The Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Forcible Conversion of Religion Bill 2002 stated that ‘No person shall convert or attempt to convert directly or otherwise any person from one religion to another either by use of force or by allurement or by any fraudulent means.’ However, soon after the defeat of the Bharatiya Janata Party-led coalition in the 2004 elections, the Tamil Nadu Government led by Jayalalitha repealed the law in June.[40]

The Gujarat Freedom of Religion Act 2003

The Gujarat Assembly passed the Freedom of Religion Act in March 2003. It was called the Dharam Swatantrata Vidheya (Freedom of Religion Act). Narendra Modi, the Chief Minister of the State, called the Act as one of the main achievements of his government's one year in office. The law prohibited conversion by force or inducement.[40]

Further reading
  • Madhya Pradesh (India)., & Niyogi, M. B. (1956). Vindicated by time: The Niyogi Committee report on Christian missionary activities. Nagpur: Government Printing, Madhya Pradesh.
  • Shourie, Arun. (2006). Missionaries in India: Continuities, changes, dilemmas. New Delhi: Rupa.ISBN 9788172232702
  • Shourie, A. (2006). Harvesting our souls: Missionaries, their design, their claims. New Delhi: Rupa.
  • Shourie, A. (2006). Indian controversies: Essays on religion in politics. New Delhi: Rupa & Co. ISBN 978-8190019927
  • Shourie, A. (2012). World of fatwas or the sharia in action. Harpercollins India.
  • Swarup, D. (1986). Politics of conversion. Delhi: Deendayal Research Institute.
  • Sharma, A. (2014). Hinduism as a missionary religion. New Delhi: Dev Publishers & Distributors.
gollark: But what kind of smoke is it? This is the pivotal question.
gollark: Thanks for the hints. I inferred the exact opposite of what you implied, for purposes.
gollark: I'm busy making some patches to osmarks.net apiosystems apiaristically, BEE.
gollark: I mean, I certainly could.
gollark: Maybe you are to?

References
  1. article 15 of India Constitution
  2. "THE CONSTITUTION (FORTY-SECOND AMENDMENT) ACT, 1976". indiacode.nic.in. Archived from the original on 28 March 2015. Retrieved 26 November 2015.
  4. Brass, Paul R. (2005). The Production of Hindu-Muslim Violence in Contemporary India. University of Washington Press. p. 65. ISBN 978-0-295-98506-0.
  6. "India: No Justice for Sikh Genocide Bloodshed". Human Rights Watch. 29 October 2014. Retrieved 28 July 2015.
  7. "Thousands call for justice for victims of 1984 Sikh massacres - Amnesty International India". Amnesty International India. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 28 July 2015.
  8. Rajni Kothari (1998). Communalism in Indian Politics. Rainbow Publishers. pp. 134. ISBN 978-81-86962-00-8. Archived from the original on 19 May 2016. Retrieved 5 August 2016.
  9. "INDOLOGY archives – March 2001 (#143)". Listserv.liv.ac.uk.
  10. "The Tribune - Windows - Main Feature". tribuneindia.com. Retrieved 23 August 2019.
  11. "Population Enumeration Data". Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs. 2011. Archived from the original on 22 May 2016. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  12. Sundar Raj, Ebe (1998). The Confusion Called Conversion. New Delhi: TRACI. p. 4.
  13. Iyadurai, Joshua (28 May 2010). "the step model of transformative religious experiences: a phenomenological understanding of religious conversions in india". Pastoral Psychology. 60 (4): 505–521. doi:10.1007/s11089-010-0287-6.
  14. "'Free pass for mobs': India urged to stem vigilante violence against minorities". the Guardian. 19 February 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2020.
  15. "Religious Freedom In India Takes 'Drastic Turn Downward,' U.S. Commission Says". NPR.org. 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2020.
  16. "Fundamental Rights (Articles 14-18, 19-22, 23-24, 25-28, 29-30, 32)". 3 September 2017. Archived from the original on 3 September 2018. Retrieved 3 September 2018.
  18. Larson, Gerald James (1 January 2001). Religion and Personal Law in Secular India: A Call to Judgment. Indiana University Press. pp. 25–27. ISBN 978-0253214805. Archived from the original on 4 May 2016. Retrieved 16 September 2015.
  19. Boyle, Kevin; Sheen, Juliet (7 March 2013). Freedom of Religion and Belief: A World Report. Routledge. pp. 191–192. ISBN 9781134722297. Archived from the original on 13 May 2016. Retrieved 15 September 2015.
  20. The Constitution of India, Right to Freedom of religion, Article 25 | "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 September 2014. Retrieved 2011-09-03.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  21. "Religious Persecution in India" (PDF). eclj.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 April 2015.
  22. Lipton, Edward P. (1 January 2002). Religious Freedom in Asia. Nova Publishers. pp. 22–25. ISBN 9781590333914. Archived from the original on 27 April 2016. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  23. "Religious Freedom in India" (PDF). state.gov.
  25. "50 Shia mourners detained in Srinagar on Muharram day". Rediff. Archived from the original on 14 April 2014. Retrieved 13 April 2014.
  26. "In Pictures: Mourners teargassed, arrested on Muharram in Kashmir". Kashmir Dispatch. Archived from the original on 14 April 2014. Retrieved 13 April 2014.
  27. "Universal Declaration of Human Rights". un.org. Archived from the original on 11 March 2019. Retrieved 14 March 2019.
  28. "Laws & Policies". All India Christian Council. Archived from the original on 27 December 2007. Retrieved 29 December 2007.
  29. See Sebastian Kim, In Search of Identity: Debates on Religious Conversion in India (Delhi & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
  30. "The Hindu : Anti-conversion laws". thehindu.com. Archived from the original on 1 December 2016. Retrieved 2 February 2015.
  31. Osuri, Goldie (2013). "The Concern for Sovereignty in the Politics of Anti-conversion". Religion Compass. 7 (9): 385–393. doi:10.1111/rec3.12064.
  33. "Ghar vapasi in Agra: The unlevel field in Muslim, Christian and Hindu conversion". Archived from the original on 13 June 2016. Retrieved 11 January 2016.
  34. "Conversions harder in India state 26/07/2006". BBC News. 26 July 2006. Archived from the original on 8 March 2008. Retrieved 1 March 2008.
  35. Mohammad, Faisal (4 August 2006). "Christian anger at conversion law 04/08/2006". BBC News. Archived from the original on 8 April 2008. Retrieved 1 March 2008.
  36. "WorldWide Religious News-Himachal enforces anti-conversion law". Wwrn.org. 22 February 2007. Archived from the original on 21 October 2007.
  37. "Let secular parties support anti-conversion bill: Amit Shah". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 25 December 2014. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
  38. TOI on International Religious Freedom Report 2003 Archived 22 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine, released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour of the US State Department
  39. Subhash Agarwal, ‘Law, Order, & Religious Conversions’, The Financial Express, Sept. 25, 2003.
  40. Secularism in India - Domenic Marbaniang - Google Boeken. Books.google.com. Archived from the original on 25 April 2016. Retrieved 1 March 2013.
  41. Ebe Sunder Raj, The Confusion Called Conversion, pp. 141-2.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.