Fake news website

Fake news websites (also referred to as hoax news websites)[1][2] are Internet websites that deliberately publish fake news—hoaxes, propaganda, and disinformation purporting to be real news—often using social media to drive web traffic and amplify their effect.[3][4][5][6] Unlike news satire, fake news websites deliberately seek to be perceived as legitimate and taken at face value, often for financial or political gain.[7][4] Such sites have promoted political falsehoods in India,[8][9] Germany,[10][11] Indonesia and the Philippines,[12] Sweden, Mexico, [13][14] Myanmar,[15] and the United States.[16][17] Many sites originate in, or are promoted by, Russia,[3][18] North Macedonia,[19][20] Romania,[21] and the United States.[22][23]

This article is about intentionally fraudulent websites. For satirical websites, see News satire.

For broader coverage of this topic, see Fake news.

Overview of coverage

One pan-European newspaper, The Local, described the proliferation of fake news as a form of psychological warfare.[13] Some media analysts have seen it as a threat to democracy.[11] In 2016, the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs passed a resolution warning that the Russian government was using "pseudo-news agencies" and Internet trolls as disinformation propaganda to weaken confidence in democratic values.[5]

Screenshot of a fake news story, falsely stating Donald Trump won the popular vote in the 2016 U.S. election[24][25]

In 2015, the Swedish Security Service, Sweden's national security agency, issued a report concluding Russia was using fake news to inflame "splits in society" through the proliferation of propaganda.[13] Sweden's Ministry of Defence tasked its Civil Contingencies Agency with combating fake news from Russia.[13] Fraudulent news affected politics in Indonesia and the Philippines, where there was simultaneously widespread usage of social media and limited resources to check the veracity of political claims.[12] German Chancellor Angela Merkel warned of the societal impact of "fake sites, bots, trolls".[11]

Fraudulent articles spread through social media during the 2016 U.S. presidential election,[16][17] and several officials within the U.S. Intelligence Community said that Russia was engaged in spreading fake news.[26] Computer security company FireEye concluded that Russia used social media to spread fake news stories[27] as part of a cyberwarfare campaign.[28] Google and Facebook banned fake sites from using online advertising.[29][30] Facebook launched a partnership with fact-checking websites to flag fraudulent news and hoaxes; debunking organizations that joined the initiative included: Snopes.com, FactCheck.org, and PolitiFact.[31] U.S. President Barack Obama said a disregard for facts created a "dust cloud of nonsense".[32] Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) Alex Younger called fake news propaganda online dangerous for democratic nations.[33]

Definition

Examples of fake news websites

ABCnews.com.co - fake site creating hoaxes by using website spoofing

Denver Guardian

RealTrueNews

The New York Times has defined "fake news" on the internet as fictitious articles deliberately fabricated to deceive readers, generally with the goal of profiting through clickbait.[34] PolitiFact has described fake news as fabricated content designed to fool readers and subsequently made viral through the Internet to crowds that increase its dissemination.[35] Others have taken as constitutive the "systemic features inherent in the design of the sources and channels through which fake news proliferates", for example by playing to the audience's cognitive biases, heuristics, and partisan affiliation.[36] Some fake news websites use website spoofing, structured to make visitors believe they are visiting trusted sources like ABC News or MSNBC.[20]

Fake news maintained a presence on the internet and in tabloid journalism in the years prior to the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[34] Before the election campaign involving Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, fake news had not impacted the election process and subsequent events to such a high degree.[34] Subsequent to the 2016 election, the issue of fake news turned into a political weapon, with supporters of left-wing politics saying that supporters of right-wing politics spread false news, while the latter claimed that they were being "censored".[34] Due to these back-and-forth complaints, the definition of fake news as used for such polemics has become more vague.[34]

Pre-Internet history

Unethical journalistic practices existed in printed media for hundreds of years before the advent of the Internet.[37][38][39] Yellow journalism, reporting from a standard which is devoid of morals and professional ethics, was pervasive during the time period in history known as the Gilded Age, and unethical journalists would engage in fraud by fabricating stories, interviews, and made-up names for scholars.[38][37] During the 1890s, the spread of this unethical news sparked violence and conflicts.[37] Both Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst fomented yellow journalism in order to increase profits, which helped lead to misunderstandings which became partially responsible for the outset of the Spanish–American War in 1898.[40] J.B. Montgomery-M’Govern wrote a column harshly critical of "fake news" in 1898, saying that what characterized "fake news" was sensationalism and “the publication of articles absolutely false, which tend to mislead an ignorant or unsuspecting public.”[41]

A radio broadcast from Gleiwitz by German soldier Karl Homack, pretending to be a Polish invader who had captured the station, was taken at face value by other stations, in Germany and abroad, fueling Adolf Hitler's declaration of war on Poland the next day.[42] According to USA Today, newspapers which have a history of commonly publishing fake news have included Globe, Weekly World News, and The National Enquirer.[40]

Prominent sources

See also: List of fake news websites

Prominent among fraudulent news sites include false propaganda created by individuals in the countries of Russia,[3][5] North Macedonia,[19][20] Romania,[21] and the United States.[22][23]

North Macedonia

Fraudulent news stories during the 2016 U.S. election were traced to teenagers in Veles, North Macedonia.

Much of the fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential election season was traced to adolescents in Macedonia, now known as North Macedonia,[19][43] specifically Veles. It is a town of 50,000 in the middle of the country, with high unemployment, where the average wage is $4,800.[44] The income from fake news was characterized by NBC News as a gold rush.[44] Adults supported this income, saying they were happy the youths were working.[45] The mayor of Veles, Slavcho Chadiev, said he was not bothered by their actions, as they were not against Macedonian law and their finances were taxable.[44] Chadiev said he was happy if deception from Veles influenced the results of the 2016 U.S. election in favor of Trump.[44]

BuzzFeed News and The Guardian separately investigated and found teenagers in Veles created over 100 sites spreading fake news stories supportive of Donald Trump.[19][46][47] The teenagers experimented with left slanted fake stories about Bernie Sanders, but found that pro-Trump fictions were more popular.[46] Prior to the 2016 election the teenagers gained revenues from fake medical advice sites.[48] One youth named Alex stated, in an August 2016 interview with The Guardian, that this fraud would remain profitable regardless of who won the election.[19] Alex explained he plagiarized material for articles by copying and pasting from other websites.[19] This could net them thousands of dollars daily, but they averaged only a few thousand per month.[48]

The Associated Press (AP) interviewed an 18-year-old in Veles about his tactics.[45] A Google Analytics analysis of his traffic showed more than 650,000 views in one week.[45] He plagiarized pro-Trump stories from a right-wing site called The Political Insider.[45] He said he did not care about politics, and published fake news to gain money and experience.[45] The AP used DomainTools to confirm the teenager was behind fake sites, and determined there were about 200 websites tracked to Veles focused on U.S. news, many of which mostly contained plagiarized legitimate news to create an appearance of credibility.[45]

NBC News also interviewed an 18-year-old there.[44] Dmitri (a pseudonym) was one of the most profitable fake news operators in town, and said about 300 people in Veles wrote for fake sites.[44] Dmitri said he gained over $60,000 during the six months prior through doing this, more than both his parents' earnings.[44] Dmitri said his main dupes were supporters of Trump.[44] He said after the 2016 U.S. election he continued to earn significant amounts.[44]

The 2020 U.S. election is their next project.[49]

Romania

"Ending the Fed", a popular purveyor of fraudulent reports, was run by a 24-year-old named Ovidiu Drobota out of Oradea, Romania, who boasted to Inc. magazine about being more popular than mainstream media.[21] Established in March 2016, "Ending the Fed" was responsible for a false story in August 2016 that incorrectly stated Fox News had fired journalist Megyn Kelly—the story was briefly prominent on Facebook on its "Trending News" section.[21] "Ending the Fed" held four out of the 10 most popular fake articles on Facebook related to the 2016 U.S. election in the prior three months before the election itself.[21] The Facebook page for the website, called "End the Feed", had 350,000 "likes" in November 2016.[21] After being contacted by Inc. magazine, Drobota stated he was proud of the impact he had on the 2016 U.S. election in favor of his preferred candidate Donald Trump.[21] According to Alexa Internet, "Ending the Fed" garnered approximately 3.4 million views over a 30-day-period in November 2016.[21] Drobota stated the majority of incoming traffic is from Facebook.[21] He said his normal line of work before starting "Ending the Fed" included web development and search engine optimization.[21]

Russia

Further information: Russian propaganda and Cyberwarfare by Russia

Internet Research Agency

Saint Petersburg

A Russian propaganda "troll farm" was traced back to Saint Petersburg.

Beginning in fall 2014, The New Yorker writer Adrian Chen performed a six-month investigation into Russian propaganda dissemination online by the Internet Research Agency (IRA).[18] Yevgeny Prigozhin (Evgeny Prigozhin), a close associate of Vladimir Putin, was behind the operation which hired hundreds of individuals to work in Saint Petersburg.[18] The organization became regarded as a "troll farm", a term used to refer to propaganda efforts controlling many accounts online with the aim of artificially providing a semblance of a grassroots organization.[18] Chen reported that Internet trolling was used by the Russian government as a tactic largely after observing the social media organization of the 2011 protests against Putin.[18]

European Union response

European Union parliamentary Committee on Foreign Affairs passed a resolution in November 2016, condemning Russian "pseudo-news agencies" and Internet trolls.

In 2015, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe released an analysis critical of disinformation campaigns by Russia masked as news.[50] This was intended to interfere with Ukraine relations with Europe after the removal of former Ukraine president Viktor Yanukovych.[50] According to Deutsche Welle, similar tactics were used in the 2016 U.S. elections.[50] The European Union created a taskforce to deal with Russian disinformation.[5][50][51] The taskforce, East StratCom Team, had 11 people including Russian speakers.[52] In November 2016, the EU voted to increase the group's funding.[52] In November 2016, the European Parliament Committee on Foreign Affairs passed a resolution warning of the use by Russia of tools including: "pseudo-news agencies ... social media and internet trolls" as disinformation to weaken democratic values.[5] The resolution requested EU analysts investigate, explaining member nations needed to be wary of disinformation.[5] The resolution condemned Russian sources for publicizing "absolutely fake" news reports.[53] The tally on 23 November 2016 passed by a margin of 304 votes to 179.[53]

Counter-Disinformation Team

The U.S. State Department planned to use a unit called the Counter-Disinformation Team, formed with the intention of combating disinformation from the Russian government, and that it was disbanded in September 2015 after department heads missed the scope of propaganda before the 2016 U.S. election.[54][55] The U.S. State Department put eight months into developing the unit before scrapping it.[54] It would have been a reboot of the Active Measures Working Group set up by Reagan Administration.[55][56] The Counter-Disinformation Team was set up under the Bureau of International Information Programs.[55][56] Work began in 2014, with the intention to combat propaganda from Russian sources such as the RT network (formerly known as Russia Today).[55][56] U.S. Intelligence officials explained to former National Security Agency analyst and counterintelligence officer John R. Schindler that the Obama Administration decided to cancel the unit as they were afraid of antagonizing Russia.[55][56] U.S. Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy Richard Stengel was point person for the unit before it was canceled.[55][56] Stengel previously wrote about disinformation by RT.[57][58][59]

Internet trolls shift focus to Trump

In December 2015 Adrian Chen noticed pro-Russia accounts suddenly became supportive of Trump.

Adrian Chen observed a pattern in December 2015 where pro-Russian accounts became supportive of 2016 U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump.[3] Andrew Weisburd and Foreign Policy Research Institute fellow and senior fellow at the Center for Cyber and Homeland Security at George Washington University, Clint Watts,[60] wrote for The Daily Beast in August 2016 that Russian propaganda fabricated articles were popularized by social media.[3] Weisburd and Watts documented how disinformation spread from Russia Today and Sputnik News, "the two biggest Russian state-controlled media organizations publishing in English", to pro-Russian accounts on Twitter.[3] Citing research by Chen, Weisburd and Watts compared Russian tactics during the 2016 U.S. election to Soviet Union Cold War strategies.[3] They referenced the 1992 United States Information Agency report to Congress, which warned about Russian propaganda called active measures.[3] They concluded social media made active measures easier.[3] Institute of International Relations Prague senior fellow and scholar on Russian intelligence, Mark Galeotti, agreed the Kremlin operations were a form of active measures.[26] The most strident Internet promoters of Trump were not U.S. citizens but paid Russian propagandists. The Guardian estimated their number to be in the "low thousands" in November 2016.[61]

Weisburd and Watts collaborated with colleague J. M. Berger and published a follow-up to their Daily Beast article in online magazine War on the Rocks, titled: "Trolling for Trump: How Russia is Trying to Destroy Our Democracy".[60][62][63] They researched 7,000 pro-Trump accounts over a ​2 ¹⁄₂-year period.[62] Their research detailed trolling techniques to denigrate critics of Russian activities in Syria, and proliferate lies about Clinton's health.[62] Watts said the propaganda targeted the alt-right, the right wing, and fascist groups.[60] After each presidential debate, thousands of Twitter bots used hashtag #Trumpwon to change perceptions.[64]

In November 2016 the Foreign Policy Research Institute[lower-alpha 1] stated Russian propaganda exacerbated criticism of Clinton and support for Trump.[16][17] The strategy involved social media, paid Internet trolls, botnets, and websites in order to denigrate Clinton.[16][17]

U.S. intelligence analysis

FireEye chairman David DeWalt concluded the Russian operation during the 2016 election was a new development in cyberwarfare by Russia.

Computer security company FireEye concluded Russia used social media as a weapon to influence the U.S. election.[28] FireEye Chairman David DeWalt said the 2016 operation was a new development in cyberwarfare by Russia.[28] FireEye CEO Kevin Mandia stated Russian cyberwarfare changed after fall 2014, from covert to overt tactics with decreased operational security.[28] Bellingcat analyst Aric Toler explained fact-checking only drew further attention to the fake news problem.[66]

U.S. Intelligence agencies debated why Putin chose summer 2016 to escalate active measures.[67] Prior to the election, U.S. national security officials said they were anxious about Russia tampering with U.S. news.[64] Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper said after the 2011–13 Russian protests, Putin lost self-confidence, and responded with the propaganda operation.[67] Former CIA officer Patrick Skinner said the goal was to spread uncertainty.[66] House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Adam Schiff commented on Putin's aims, and said U.S. intelligence were concerned with Russian propaganda.[67] Speaking about disinformation that appeared in Hungary, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and Poland, Schiff said there was an increase of the same behavior in the U.S.[67]

U.S. intelligence officials stated in November 2016 they believed Russia engaged in spreading fake news,[26] and the FBI released a statement saying they were investigating.[26][64] Two U.S. intelligence officials each told BuzzFeed News they "believe Russia helped disseminate fake and propagandized news as part of a broader effort to influence and undermine the presidential election".[26] The U.S. intelligence sources stated this involved "dissemination of completely fake news stories".[26] They told BuzzFeed the FBI investigation specifically focused on why "Russia had engaged in spreading false or misleading information".[26]

United States

Main article: Fake news websites in the United States

By country

Fake news has influenced political discourse in multiple countries, including Germany,[11] Indonesia and the Philippines,[12] Sweden,[13] China,[68][69] Myanmar,[70][15] and the United States.[3]

Austria

Politicians in Austria dealt with the impact of fake news and its spread on social media after the 2016 presidential campaign in the country.[71] In December 2016, a court in Austria issued an injunction on Facebook Europe, mandating it block negative postings related to Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek, Austrian Green Party Chairwoman.[71] According to The Washington Post the postings to Facebook about her "appeared to have been spread via a fake profile" and directed derogatory epithets towards the Austrian politician.[71] The derogatory postings were likely created by the identical fake profile that had previously been utilized to attack Alexander van der Bellen, who won the election for President of Austria.[71]

Brazil

See also: WhatsApp § 2018 elections in Brazil

Brazil faced increasing influence from fake news after the 2014 re-election of President Dilma Rousseff and Rousseff's subsequent impeachment in August 2016.[72] In the week surrounding one of the impeachment votes, 3 out of the 5 most-shared articles on Facebook in Brazil were fake.[72] In 2015, reporter Tai Nalon resigned from her position at Brazilian newspaper Folha de S.Paulo in order to start the first fact-checking website in Brazil, called Aos Fatos (To The Facts).[72] Nalon told The Guardian there was a great deal of fake news, and hesitated to compare the problem to that experienced in the U.S.[72]

Canada

Fake news online was brought to the attention of Canadian politicians in November 2016, as they debated helping assist local newspapers.[73] Member of Parliament for Vancouver Centre Hedy Fry specifically discussed fake news as an example of ways in which publishers on the Internet are less accountable than print media.[73] Discussion in parliament contrasted increase of fake news online with downsizing of Canadian newspapers and the impact for democracy in Canada.[73] Representatives from Facebook Canada attended the meeting and told members of Parliament they felt it was their duty to assist individuals gather data online.[73]

China

See also: Censorship in China, Internet censorship in China, and Chinese cyberwarfare

Fake news during the 2016 U.S. election spread to China.[72] Articles popularized within the United States were translated into Chinese and spread within China.[72] The government of China used the growing problem of fake news as a rationale for increasing Internet censorship in China in November 2016.[74] China then published an editorial in its Communist Party newspaper The Global Times called: "Western Media's Crusade Against Facebook", and criticized "unpredictable" political problems posed by freedoms enjoyed by users of Twitter, Google, and Facebook.[68] China government leaders meeting in Wuzhen at the third World Internet Conference in November 2016 said fake news in the U.S. election justified adding more curbs to free and open use of the Internet.[69] China Deputy Minister Ren Xianliang, official at the Cyberspace Administration of China, said increasing online participation led to "harmful information" and fraud.[75] Kam Chow Wong, a former Hong Kong law enforcement official and criminal justice professor at Xavier University, praised attempts in the U.S. to patrol social media.[76] The Wall Street Journal noted China's themes of Internet censorship became more relevant at the World Internet Conference due to the outgrowth of fake news.[77]

Finland

Officials from 11 countries held a meeting in Helsinki in November 2016, in order to plan the formation of a center to combat disinformation cyber-warfare including spread of fake news on social media.[78] The center is planned to be located in Helsinki and include efforts from 10 countries with participation from Sweden, Germany, Finland, and the U.S.[78] Prime Minister of Finland Juha Sipilä planned to deal with the center in spring 2017 with a motion before the Parliament of Finland.[78] Jori Arvonen, Deputy Secretary of State for EU Affairs, said cyberwarfare became an increased problem in 2016, and included hybrid cyber-warfare intrusions into Finland from Russia and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.[78] Arvonen cited examples including fake news online, disinformation, and the little green men troops during the Ukrainian crisis.[78]

France

France saw an uptick in amounts of disinformation and propaganda, primarily in the midst of election cycles.[72] Le Monde fact-checking division "Les décodeurs" was headed by Samuel Laurent, who told The Guardian in December 2016 the upcoming French presidential election campaign in spring 2017 would face problems from fake news.[72] The country faced controversy regarding fake websites providing false information about abortion.[72] The government's lower parliamentary body moved forward with intentions to ban such fake sites.[72] Laurence Rossignol, women's minister for France, informed parliament though the fake sites look neutral, in actuality their intentions were specifically targeted to give women fake information.[72] During the 10-year period preceding 2016, France was witness to an increase in popularity of far-right alternative news sources called the fachosphere ("facho" referring to fascist); known as the extreme right on the Internet.[72] According to sociologist Antoine Bevort, citing data from Alexa Internet rankings, the most consulted political websites in France included Égalité et Réconciliation, François Desouche, and Les Moutons Enragés.[79][80] These sites increased skepticism towards mainstream media from both left and right perspectives.[72]

Germany

German Chancellor Angela Merkel lamented the problem of fraudulent news reports in a November 2016 speech, days after announcing her campaign for a fourth term as leader of her country.[11] In a speech to the German parliament, Merkel was critical of such fake sites, saying they harmed political discussion.[11] Merkel called attention to the need of government to deal with Internet trolls, bots, and fake news websites.[11] She warned that such fraudulent news websites were a force increasing the power of populist extremism.[11] Merkel called fraudulent news a growing phenomenon that might need to be regulated in the future.[11] Germany's foreign intelligence agency Federal Intelligence Service Chief, Bruno Kahl, warned of the potential for cyberattacks by Russia in the 2017 German election.[81] He said the cyberattacks would take the form of the intentional spread of disinformation.[81] Kahl said the goal is to increase chaos in political debates.[81] Germany's domestic intelligence agency Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution Chief, Hans-Georg Maassen, said sabotage by Russian intelligence was a present threat to German information security.[81]

India

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, director at Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, thinks that "the problems of disinformation in a society like India might be more sophisticated and more challenging than they are in the West".[82] The damage caused due to fake news on social media has increased due to the growth of the internet penetration in India, which has risen from 137 million internet users in 2012 to over 600 million in 2019.[83] India is the largest market for WhatsApp, with over 230 million users, and as a result one of the main platforms on which fake news is spread.[84][85] One of the main problems is of receivers believing anything sent to them over social media due to lack of awareness.[86][87] Various initiatives and practices have been started and adopted to curb the spread and impact of fake news.[88] Fake news is also spread through Facebook and Twitter.[89][90][91]

According to a report by The Guardian, the Indian media research agency CMS stated that the cause of spread of fake news was that India "lacked (a) media policy for verification". Additionally, law enforcement officers have arrested reporters and journalists for "creating fictitious articles", especially when the articles were controversial.[92]

In India, fake news has been predominantly spread by the right-wing of the political spectrum, especially by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and many media outlets aligned with it. For example, a study published in ThePrint claimed that on Twitter, there were at least 17,000 accounts spreading fake news to favour the BJP, while around 147 accounts were spreading fake news to favour the Indian National Congress.[93] Similarly, the IT Cell of the BJP has been accused of spreading fake news against the party's political opponents, religious minorities, and any campaigns against the party.[94][95]

Prominent fake news-spreading websites and online resources include OpIndia[96][97] and Postcard News.[98][99]

Indonesia and Philippines

Fraudulent news has been particularly problematic in Indonesia and the Philippines, where social media has an outsized political influence.[12] According to media analysts, developing countries with new access to social media and democracy felt the fake news problem to a larger extent.[12] In some developing countries, Facebook gives away smartphone data free of charge for Facebook and media sources, but at the same time does not provide the user with Internet access to fact-checking websites.[12]

Italy

President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Laura Boldrini, stated: "Fake news is a critical issue and we can’t ignore it. We have to act now."[100]

Between October 1 and November 30, 2016, ahead of the Italian constitutional referendum, five out of ten referendum-related stories with most social media participation were hoaxes or inaccurate.[101][102] Of the three stories with the most social media attention, two were fake.[102] Prime Minister of Italy Matteo Renzi met with U.S. President Obama and leaders of Europe at a meeting in Berlin, Germany in November 2016, and spoke about the fake news problem.[100] Renzi hosted discussions on Facebook Live in an effort to rebut falsities online.[101] The influence became so heavy that a senior adviser to Renzi began a defamation complaint on an anonymous Twitter user who had used the screenname "Beatrice di Maio".[72]

The Five Star Movement (M5S), an Italian political party founded by Beppe Grillo, managed fake news sites amplifying support for Russian news, propaganda, and inflamed conspiracy theories.[100][103] The party's site TzeTze had 1.2 million Facebook fans and shared fake news and pieces supportive of Putin cited to Russia-owned sources including Sputnik News.[103] TzeTze plagiarized the Russian sources, and copied article titles and content from Sputnik.[104] TzeTze, another site critical of Renzi called La Cosa, and a blog by Grillo—were managed by the company Casaleggio Associati which was started by Five Star Movement co-founder Gianroberto Casaleggio.[103] Casaleggio's son Davide Casaleggio owns and manages TzeTze and La Cosa, and medical advice website La Fucina which markets anti-vaccine conspiracy theories and medical cure-all methods.[104] Grillo's blog, Five Star Movement fake sites use the same IP addresses, Google Analytics and Google Adsense.[104]

Cyberwarfare against Renzi increased, and Italian newspaper La Stampa brought attention to false stories by Russia Today which wrongly asserted a pro-Renzi rally in Rome was actually an anti-Renzi rally.[72] In October 2016, the Five Star Movement disseminated a video from Kremlin-aligned Russia Today which falsely reported displaying thousands of individuals protesting the 4 December 2016 scheduled referendum in Italy—when in fact the video that went on to 1.5 million views showed supporters of the referendum.[103][104] President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Laura Boldrini, stated: "Fake news is a critical issue and we can’t ignore it. We have to act now."[100] Boldrini met on 30 November 2016 with vice president of public policy in Europe for Facebook Richard Allan to voice concerns about fake news.[100] She said Facebook needed to admit they were a media company.[100]

Mexico

Elections in Mexico are always rigged by the misinformation that is let out in the public. This is true for any political party, whether they are democratic or authoritarian. Due to the false information that easily influences voters in Mexico, it can threaten that state of the country because actions that are taken by misinformed citizens. In Mexico, fake exit polls have been moving within digital media outlets. What this means is that citizens are not receiving real data on what is happening in their elections.[105]

Moldova

Amid the 2018 local elections in Moldova a doctored video with mistranslated subtitles purported to show that the a pro-Europe party candidate for mayor of Chisinau (pop. 685,900), the capital of Moldova had proposed to lease the city of Chisinau to the UAE for 50 years.[106] The video was watched more than 300,000 times on Facebook and almost 250,000 times on the Russian social network site OK.ru, which is popular among Moldova's Russian-speaking population.[106]

Myanmar

See also: Persecution of Muslims in Myanmar

In 2015, fake stories using unrelated photographs and fraudulent captions were shared online in support of the Rohingya.[107] Fake news negatively affected individuals in Myanmar, leading to a rise in violence against Muslims in the country.[70][15] Online participation surged from one percent to 20 percent of Myanmar's total populace from 2014–2016.[70][15] Fake stories from Facebook were reprinted in paper periodicals called Facebook and The Internet.[15] False reporting related to practitioners of Islam in the country was directly correlated with increased attacks on people of the religion in Myanmar.[70][15] Fake news fictitiously stated believers in Islam acted out in violence at Buddhist locations.[70][15] BuzzFeed News documented a direct relationship between the fake news and violence against Muslim people.[70][15] It noted countries that were relatively newer to Internet exposure were more vulnerable to the problems of fake news and fraud.[15]

Pakistan

Khawaja Muhammad Asif, the Minister of Defence of Pakistan, threatened to nuke Israel on Twitter after a false story claiming that Avigdor Lieberman, the Israeli Ministry of Defense, said "If Pakistan send ground troops into Syria on any pretext, we will destroy this country with a nuclear attack."[108][109]

Poland

In 2016 Polish historian Jerzy Targalski noted fake news websites had infiltrated Poland through anti-establishment and right-wing sources that copied content from Russia Today.[110] Targalski observed there existed about 20 specific fake news websites in Poland which spread Russian disinformation in the form of fake news.[110] One example cited was the false claim that Ukraine had claimed that the Polish city of Przemyśl was occupied by Poland.[110] In 2020 fake news websites related to the coronovrius pandemic have been identified and officially labelled as such by the Polish Ministry of Health.[111]

Sweden

The Swedish Security Service issued a report in 2015 identifying propaganda from Russia infiltrating Sweden with the objective to amplify pro-Russian propaganda and inflame societal conflicts.[13] The Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB), part of the Ministry of Defence of Sweden, identified fake news reports targeting Sweden in 2016 which originated from Russia.[13] Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency official Mikael Tofvesson stated a pattern emerged where views critical of Sweden were constantly repeated.[13] The MSB identified Russia Today and Sputnik News as significant fake news purveyors.[13] As a result of growth in this propaganda in Sweden, the MSB planned to hire six additional security officials to fight back against the campaign of fraudulent information.[13]

Taiwan

In a report in December 2015 by The China Post, a fake video shared online showed people a light show purportedly made at the Shihmen Reservoir.[112] The Northern Region Water Resources Office confirmed there was no light show at the reservoir and the event had been fabricated.[112] The fraud led to an increase in tourist visits to the actual attraction.[112]

Ukraine

Deutsche Welle interviewed the founder of Stopfake.org in 2014 about the website's efforts to debunk fake news in Ukraine, including media portrayal of the Ukrainian crisis.[113] Co-founder Margot Gontar began the site in March 2014, and it was aided by volunteers.[113] In 2014, Deutsche Welle awarded the fact-checker website with the People's Choice Award for Russian in its ceremony The BOBs, recognizing excellence in advocacy on the Internet.[113] Gontar highlighted an example debunked by the website, where a fictitious "Doctor Rozovskii" supposedly told The Guardian pro-Ukraine individuals refused to allow him to tend to injured in fighting with Russian supporters in 2014.[113] Stopfake.org exposed the event was fabricated—there actually was no individual named "Doctor Rozovskii", and found the Facebook photo distributed with the incident was of a different individual from Russia with a separate identity.[113] Former Ukraine president Viktor Yanukovych's ouster from power created instability, and in 2015 the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe concluded Russian disinformation campaigns used fake news to disrupt relations between Europe and Ukraine.[50] Russian-financed news spread disinformation after the conflict in Ukraine motivated the European Union to found the European External Action Service specialist task force to counter the propaganda.[50]

United Kingdom

See also: Fake news by country § United Kingdom, and Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum

Labour MP Michael Dugher was assigned by Deputy Leader of the Labour Party Tom Watson in November 2016 to investigate the impact of fake news spread through social media.[114] Watson said they would work with Twitter and Facebook to root out clear-cut circumstances of "downright lies".[114] Watson wrote an article for The Independent where he suggested methods to respond to fake news, including Internet-based societies which fact-check in a manner modeled after Wikipedia.[115] Minister for Culture, Matthew Hancock, stated the British government would investigate the impact of fake news and its pervasiveness on social media websites.[116] Watson stated he welcomed the investigation into fake news by the government.[116] On 8 December 2016, Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) Alex Younger delivered a speech to journalists at the MI6 headquarters where he called fake news and propaganda damaging to democracy.[33] Younger said the mission of MI6 was to combat propaganda and fake news in order to deliver to his government a strategic advantage in the information warfare arena, and assist other nations including European countries.[33] He called such methods of fake news propaganda online as a "fundamental threat to our sovereignty".[33] Younger said all nations that hold democratic values should feel the same worry over fake news.[33]

United States

Main article: Fake news websites in the United States

2016 election cycle

U.S. President Barack Obama said, "If we can't discriminate between serious arguments and propaganda, then we have problems."[117][118]

Fraudulent stories during the 2016 U.S. presidential election popularized on Facebook included a viral post that Pope Francis had endorsed Donald Trump, and another that actor Denzel Washington "backs Trump in the most epic way possible".[119][120] Donald Trump's son and campaign surrogate Eric Trump, top national security adviser Michael T. Flynn, and then-campaign managers Kellyanne Conway and Corey Lewandowski shared fake news stories during the campaign.[117][121][122][123] Alternet reported that Trump himself had been the source of some of the related misinformation over the years.[124]

Misuse of the term

After the 2016 election, Republican politicians and conservative media began to appropriate the term by using it to describe any news they see as hostile to their agenda, according to The New York Times, which cited Breitbart News, Rush Limbaugh and supporters of Donald Trump as dismissing true mainstream news reports, and any news they do not like as "fake news".[125]

U.S. response to Russia in Syria

The Russian state-operated newswire RIA Novosti, known as Sputnik International, reported fake news and fabricated statements by White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest.[126] RIA Novosti falsely reported on 7 December 2016 that Earnest stated sanctions for Russia were on the table related to Syria.[126] RIA Novosti falsely quoted Earnest as saying: "There are a number of things that are to be considered, including some of the financial sanctions that the United States can administer in coordination with our allies. I would definitely not rule that out."[126] However, the word "sanctions" was never used by the Press Secretary.[126] Russia was discussed in eight instances during the press conference, but never about sanctions.[126] The press conference focused solely on Russian air raids in Syria towards rebels fighting President of Syria Bashar al-Assad in Aleppo.[126]

Legislative and executive responses

Members of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee traveled to Ukraine and Poland in March 2016 and heard about Russian operations to influence internal Ukrainian matters.[127] Senator Angus King recalled they were informed about Russia "planting fake news stories" during elections.[127] On 30 November 2016 seven members of the Senate Intelligence Committee asked President Obama to publicize information on Russia's role in spreading disinformation in the U.S. election.[127][128][129] On 30 November 2016, legislators approved a measure within the National Defense Authorization Act to finance the U.S. State Department to act against foreign propaganda.[130][131] The initiative was developed through a bipartisan bill, the Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act, written by U.S. Senators Republican Rob Portman and Democrat Chris Murphy.[130] Republican U.S. Senators stated they planned to hold hearings and investigate Russian influence on the 2016 U.S. elections.[132] By doing so they went against the preference of incoming Republican President-elect Donald Trump, who downplayed any potential Russian meddling in the election.[132] Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, and Senator Lindsey Graham all planned investigations in the 115th U.S. Congress session.[132]

U.S. President Barack Obama commented on fake news online in a speech the day before Election Day in 2016, saying social media spread lies and created a "dust cloud of nonsense".[32][133] Obama commented again on the problem after the election: "if we can't discriminate between serious arguments and propaganda, then we have problems."[117][118] On December 9, 2016, President Obama ordered U.S. Intelligence Community to conduct a complete review of the Russian propaganda operation.[134] In his year-end press conference on December 16, 2016, President Obama criticized a hyper-partisan atmosphere for enabling the proliferation of fake news.[135]

Conspiracy theories and 2016 pizzeria attack

In November 2016, fake news sites and Internet forums falsely implicated the restaurant Comet Ping Pong and Democratic Party figures as part of a fictitious child trafficking ring, which was dubbed "Pizzagate".[136] The rumor was widely debunked by sources such as the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, fact-checking website Snopes.com, The New York Times, and Fox News.[137][138][139][140] The restaurant's owners were harassed and threatened, and increased their security.[136][141][142] On 4 December 2016, an individual from Salisbury, North Carolina, walked into the restaurant to "self-investigate" this conspiracy theory. He brought a semi-automatic rifle, and fired shots before being arrested; no one was injured.[139][143] The suspect told police that he planned to "self-investigate" the conspiracy theory,[139] and was charged with assault with a dangerous weapon, carrying a pistol without a license, unlawful discharge of a firearm, and carrying a rifle or shotgun outside the home or business.[144] After the incident, future National Security Advisor Michael T. Flynn and his son Michael G. Flynn were criticized by many reporters for spreading the rumors.[145][146][147] Two days after the shooting, Trump fired Michael G. Flynn from his transition team in connection with Flynn's Twitter posting of fake news.[148][149] Days after the attack, Hillary Clinton spoke out on the dangers of fake news in a tribute speech to retiring Senator Harry Reid at the U.S. Capitol, and called the problem an epidemic.[150][151]

2018 Midterm Elections

To track junk news shared on Facebook during the 2018 midterm elections, the Junk News Aggregator was launched by the Computational Propaganda Project of the Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford. This Aggregator is a public platform, offering three interactive tools for tracking in near real-time public posts shared on Facebook by junk news sources, showing the content and the user engagement numbers that these posts have received.[152]

Response

Fact-checking websites and journalists

Further information: FactCheck.org, PolitiFact.com, and Snopes.com

PolitiFact.com was praised by rival fact-checker FactCheck.org and recommended as a resource to debunk fake news sites.

Fact-checking websites FactCheck.org, PolitiFact.com and Snopes.com authored guides on how to respond to fraudulent news.[4][153][154] FactCheck.org advised readers to check the source, author, date, and headline of publications.[153] They recommended their colleagues Snopes.com, The Washington Post Fact Checker,[lower-alpha 2] and PolitiFact.com.[153] FactCheck.org admonished consumers to be wary of confirmation bias.[153] PolitiFact.com used a "Fake news" tag so readers could view all stories Politifact had debunked.[154] Snopes.com warned readers social media was used as a harmful tool by fraudsters.[4] The Washington Post's "The Fact Checker" manager Glenn Kessler wrote that all fact-checking sites saw increased visitors during the 2016 election cycle.[156] Unique visitors to The Fact Checker increased five-fold from the 2012 election.[156] Will Moy, director of London-based fact-checker Full Fact, said debunking must take place over a sustained period to be effective.[156] Full Fact worked with Google to help automate fact-checking.[157]

FactCheck.org former director Brooks Jackson said media companies devoted increased focus to the importance of debunking fraud during the 2016 election.[155] FactCheck.org partnered with CNN's Jake Tapper in 2016 to examine the veracity of candidate statements.[155] Angie Drobnic Holan, editor of PolitiFact.com, cautioned media companies chiefs must be supportive of debunking, as it often provokes hate mail and extreme responses from zealots.[155] In December 2016, PolitiFact announced fake news was its selection for "Lie of the Year".[158][35] PolitiFact explained its choice for the year: "In 2016, the prevalence of political fact abuse – promulgated by the words of two polarizing presidential candidates and their passionate supporters – gave rise to a spreading of fake news with unprecedented impunity."[35] PolitiFact called fake news a significant symbol of a culture accepting of post-truth politics.[158]

Google CEO comment and actions

See also: Criticism of Google

In the aftermath of the 2016 U.S. election, Google and Facebook, faced scrutiny regarding the impact of fake news.[159] The top result on Google for election results was to a fake site.[160] "70 News" had fraudulently written an incorrect headline and article that Trump won the popular vote against Clinton.[24][25][159] Google later stated that prominence of the fake site in search results was a mistake.[161] By 14 November, the "70 News" result was the second link shown when searching for results of the election.[159] When asked shortly after the election whether fake news influenced election results, Google CEO Sundar Pichai responded: "Sure" and went on to emphasize the importance of stopping the spread of fraudulent sites.[162] On 14 November 2016, Google responded to the problem of fraudulent sites by banning such companies from profiting on advertising from traffic through its program AdSense.[29][30][159] Google previously had a policy for denying ads for dieting ripoffs and counterfeit merchandise.[163] Google stated upon the announcement they would work to ban advertisements from sources that lie about their purpose, content, or publisher.[164][165] The ban is not expected to apply to news satire sites like The Onion, although some satirical sites may be inadvertently blocked under the new system.[159]

On 25 April 2017, Ben Gomes wrote a blog post announcing changes to the search algorithms that would stop the "spread of blatantly misleading, low quality, offensive or downright false information."[166] On July 27, 2017, the World Socialist Web Site published data that showed a significant drop after the April 25 announcement in Google referrals to left-wing and anti-war websites, including the ACLU, Alternet, and Counterpunch.[167] The World Socialist Web Site insists that the "fake news" charge is a cover to remove anti-establishment websites from public access, and believes the algorithm changes are infringing on the democratic right to free speech.[168]

Facebook deliberations

See also: Criticism of Facebook

Blocking fraudulent advertisers

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg specifically recommended fact-checking site Snopes.com.

One day after Google took action, Facebook decided to block fake sites from advertising there.[30][159] Facebook said they would ban ads from sites with deceptive content, including fake news, and review publishers for compliance.[164] These steps by both Google and Facebook intended to deny ad revenue to fraudulent news sites; neither company took actions to prevent dissemination of false stories in search engine results pages or web feeds.[29][169] Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg called the notion that fraudulent news impacted the 2016 election a "crazy idea"[170][171] and denied that his platform influenced the election.[172] He stated that 99% of Facebook's content was neither fake news nor a hoax.[173] Zuckerberg said that Facebook is not a media company.[174] Zuckerberg advised users to check the fact-checking website Snopes.com whenever they encounter fake news on Facebook.[175][176]

Top staff members at Facebook did not feel simply blocking ad revenue from fraudulent sites was a strong enough response, and they made an executive decision and created a secret group to deal with the issue themselves.[170][171] In response to Zuckerberg's first statement that fraudulent news did not impact the 2016 election, the secret Facebook group disputed this notion, saying fake news was rampant on their website during the election cycle.[170][171] The secret task force included dozens of Facebook employees.[170][171]

Response

Facebook faced criticism after its decision to revoke advertising revenues from fraudulent news providers, and not take further action.[177][178] After negative media coverage including assertions that fraudulent news gave the 2016 U.S. presidential election to Trump, Zuckerberg posted a second time about it on 18 November 2016.[177][178] The post was a reversal of his earlier comments on the matter where he had discounted the impact of fraudulent news.[178] Zuckerberg said there it was difficult to filter out fraudulent news because he desired open communication.[177] Measures considered and not implemented by Facebook included adding an ability for users to tag questionable material, automated checking tools, and third-party confirmation.[177] The 18 November post did not announce any concrete actions the company would definitively take, or when such measures would be put into usage.[177][178]

National Public Radio observed the changes being considered by Facebook to identify fraud constituted progress for the company into a new media entity.[179] On 19 November 2016, BuzzFeed advised Facebook users they could report posts from fraudulent sites.[180] Users could choose the report option: "I think it shouldn't be on Facebook", followed by: "It's a false news story."[180] In November 2016, Facebook began assessing use of warning labels on fake news.[181] The rollout was at first only available to a few users in a testing phase.[181] A sample warning read: "This website is not a reliable news source. Reason: Classification Pending".[181] TechCrunch analyzed the new feature during the testing phase and surmised it may have a tendency towards false positives.[181]

Fake news proliferation on Facebook had a negative financial impact for the company. Brian Wieser of Pivotal Research predicted that revenues could decrease by two percentage points due to the concern over fake news and loss of advertising dollars.[182] Shortly after Mark Zuckerberg's second statement on fake news proliferation on his website, Facebook decided to engage in assisting the government of China with a version of its software in the country to allow increased censorship by the government.[183] Barron's contributor William Pesek was highly critical of this move, writing by porting its fake news conundrum to China, Facebook would become a tool in that Communist Party's General Secretary Xi Jinping's efforts to increase censorship.[183]

Partnership with debunkers

Society of Professional Journalists president Lynn Walsh said in November 2016 that they would reach out to Facebook to assist weeding out fake news.[184] Walsh said Facebook should evolve and admit it functioned as a media company.[184] On 17 November 2016, the Poynter International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN)[lower-alpha 3] published an open letter on the Poynter Institute website to Mark Zuckerberg, imploring him to utilize fact-checkers to identify fraud on Facebook.[187][188] Signatories to the 2016 letter to Zuckerberg featured a global representation of fact-checking groups, including: Africa Check, FactCheck.org, PolitiFact.com, and The Washington Post Fact Checker.[187][188] In his second post on the matter on 18 November 2016, Zuckerberg responded to the fraudulent news problem by suggesting usage of fact-checkers.[175][176] He specifically identified fact-checking website Snopes.com, and pointed out that Facebook monitors links to such debunkers in reply comments to determine which original posts were fraudulent.[175][176]

On 15 December 2016, Facebook announced more specifics in its efforts to combat fake news and hoaxes on its site.[189][31][190] The company said it would form a partnership with fact-checking groups that had joined the Poynter International Fact-Checking Network fact-checkers' code of principles, to help debunk fraud on the site.[31][189] It was the first instance Facebook had ever given third-party entities highlighted featuring in its News Feed, a significant motivator of web traffic online.[31] The fact-checking organizations partnered with Facebook in order to confirm whether or not links posted from one individual to another on the site were factual or fraudulent.[31] Facebook did not finance the fact-checkers, and acknowledged they could see increased traffic to their sites from the partnership.[31]

Fact-checking organizations that joined Facebook's initiative included: ABC News, The Washington Post, Snopes.com, FactCheck.org, PolitiFact, and the Associated Press.[31] Fraudulent articles will receive a warning tag: "disputed by 3rd party fact-checkers".[189] The company planned to start with obvious cases of hoaxes shared specifically for fraudulent purposes to gain money for the purveyor of fake news.[31] Users may still share such tagged articles, and they will show up farther down in the news feed with an accompanying warning.[189] Facebook will employ staff researchers to determine whether website spoofing has occurred, for example "washingtonpost.co" instead of the real washingtonpost.com.[190] In a post on 15 December, Mark Zuckerberg acknowledged the changing nature of Facebook: "I think of Facebook as a technology company, but I recognize we have a greater responsibility than just building technology that information flows through. While we don't write the news stories you read and share, we also recognize we're more than just a distributor of news. We're a new kind of platform for public discourse -- and that means we have a new kind of responsibility to enable people to have the most meaningful conversations, and to build a space where people can be informed."[190]

Proposed technology tools

New York magazine contributor Brian Feldman created a Google Chrome extension that would warn users about fraudulent news sites.[191] He invited others to use his code and improve upon it.[191] Upworthy co-founder and The Filter Bubble author Eli Pariser launched an open-source model initiative on 17 November 2016 to address false news.[192][193] Pariser began a Google Document to collaborate with others online on how to lessen the phenomenon of fraudulent news.[192][193] Pariser called his initiative: "Design Solutions for Fake News".[192] Pariser's document included recommendations for a ratings organization analogous to the Better Business Bureau, and a database on media producers in a format like Wikipedia.[192][193] Writing for Fortune, Matthew Ingram agreed with the idea that Wikipedia could serve as a helpful model to improve Facebook's analysis of potentially fake news.[194] Ingram concluded Facebook could benefit from a social network form of fact-checking similar to Wikipedia's methods while incorporating debunking websites such as PolitiFact.com.[194]

Others

Pope Francis, the leader of the Roman Catholic Church, spoke out against fake news in an interview with the Belgian Catholic weekly Tertio (magazine) on 7 December 2016.[195] The Pope had prior experience being the subject of a fake news website fiction—during the 2016 U.S. election cycle, he was falsely said to support Donald Trump for president.[195][119][120] Pope Francis said the singular worst thing the news media could do was spreading disinformation and that amplifying fake news instead of educating society was a sin. He compared salacious reporting of scandals, whether true or not, to coprophilia and the consumption of it to coprophagy.[196][197][198][199] The Pope said that he did not intend to offend with his strong words, but emphasized that "a lot of damage can be done" when the truth is disregarded and slander is spread.[197][199]

Academic analysis

Jamie Condliffe wrote that banning ad revenue from fraudulent sites was not aggressive enough action by Facebook to deal with the problem, and did not prevent fake news from appearing in Facebook news feeds.[43] University of Michigan political scientist Brendan Nyhan criticized Facebook for not doing more to combat fake news amplification.[200] Indiana University computer science professor Filippo Menczer commented on measures by Google and Facebook to deny fraudulent sites revenue, saying it was a good step to reduce motivation for fraudsters.[201] Menczer's research team engaged in developing an online tool titled: Hoaxy — to see the pervasiveness of unconfirmed assertions as well as related debunking on the Internet.[202]

Zeynep Tufekci has written that Facebook amplified fake news and echo chambers.

Zeynep Tufekci wrote critically about Facebook's stance on fraudulent news sites, stating that fraudulent websites in Macedonia profited handsomely off false stories about the 2016 U.S. election.[203] Tufecki wrote that Facebook's algorithms, and structure exacerbated the impact of echo chambers and increased fake news blight.[203]

In 2016 Melissa Zimdars, associate professor of communications at Merrimack College,[204] created a handout for her Introduction to Mass Communication students titled "False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and/or Satirical 'News' Sources" and posted it on Google docs.[205] It was circulated on social media, and on November 15, 2016 The Los Angeles Times published the class handout under the title "Want to keep fake news out of your newsfeed? College professor creates list of sites to avoid".[206] Zimdars said that the list "wasn't intended to be widely distributed", and expressed concern that "people are taking it as this list of 'fake' sites, which is not its purpose". On November 17th 2016 Zimdars deleted the list.[207] On January 3rd 2017, Zimdars replaced the original handout with a new list at the same URL.[208] The new list has removed most of the sites from the original handout, added many new sites, and greatly expanded the categories.

Stanford University professors Sam Wineburg and Sarah McGrew authored a 2016 study analyzing students' ability to discern fraudulent news from factual.[209][210] The study took place over a year-long period of time, and involved a sample size of over 7,800 responses from university, secondary and middle school students in 12 states within the United States.[209][210] They were surprised at the consistency with which students thought fraudulent news reports were factual.[209][210] The study found 82% of students in middle school were unable to differentiate between an advertisement denoted as sponsored content from an actual news article.[211] The authors concluded the solution was to educate online media consumers to themselves behave like fact-checkers — and actively question the veracity of all sources.[209][210] A 2019 study in the journal Science, which examined dissemination of fake news articles on Facebook in the 2016 election, found that sharing of fake news articles on Facebook was "relatively rare", conservatives were more likely than liberals or moderates to share fake news, and there is a "strong age effect", whereby individuals over 65 are vastly more likely to share fake news than younger cohorts.[212] Another 2019 study in Science found, "fake news accounted for nearly 6% of all news consumption [on Twitter], but it was heavily concentrated—only 1% of users were exposed to 80% of fake news, and 0.1% of users were responsible for sharing 80% of fake news. Interestingly, fake news was most concentrated among conservative voters."[213]

Scientist Emily Willingham has proposed applying the scientific method to fake news analysis.[214] She had previously written on the topic of differentiating science from pseudoscience, and proposed applying that logic to fake news.[214] She calls the recommended steps Observe, Question, Hypothesize, Analyze data, Draw conclusion, and Act on results.[214] Willingham suggested a hypothesis of "This is real news", and then forming a strong set of questions to attempt to disprove the hypothesis.[214] These tests included: check the URL, date of the article, evaluate reader bias and writer bias, double-check the evidence, and verify the sources cited.[214] University of Connecticut philosophy professor Michael P. Lynch said that a troubling number of individuals make determinations relying upon the most recent piece of information they've consumed.[34] He said the greater issue however was that fake news could make people less likely to believe news that really is true.[34] Lynch summed up the thought process of such individuals, as "...ignore the facts because nobody knows what’s really true anyway."[34]

See also: Journalistic objectivity

In 2019, David Lazer and other researchers, from Northeastern University, Harvard University, and the University at Buffalo, analyzed engagement with a previously defined set of fake news sources on Twitter. They found that such engagement was highly concentrated both among a small number of websites and a small number of Twitter users. Five percent of the sources accounted for over fifty percent of exposures. Among users, 0.1 percent consumed eighty percent of the volume from fake news sources.[215]

See also

• Clickbait
• Confirmation bias
• Disinformation
• Echo chamber (media)
• Euromyth
• Fallacy of composition
• False equivalence
• Filter bubble
• Information silo
• List of fake news websites
• Lamestream media
• Post-truth politics
• Selective exposure theory
• Spiral of silence
• Tribe (Internet)
• Yellow journalism

Footnotes

1. Fortune magazine described the Foreign Policy Research Institute as: "a conservative think tank known for its generally hawkish stance on relations between the U.S. and Russia"[65]
2. "The Fact Checker" is a project by The Washington Post to analyze political claims.[155] Their colleagues and competitors at FactCheck.org recommended The Fact Checker as a resource to use before assuming a story is factual.[153]
3. Created in September 2015, the Poynter International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) is housed within the St. Petersburg, Florida-based Poynter Institute for Media Studies and aims to support the work of 64 member fact-checking organizations around the world.[185][186] Alexios Mantzarlis, co-founder of FactCheckEU.org and former managing editor of Italian fact-checking site Pagella Politica, was named director and editor of IFCN in September 2015.[185][186]

References

1. Bartolotta, Devin (9 December 2016), "Hillary Clinton Warns About Hoax News On Social Media", WJZ-TV, retrieved 11 December 2016
2. Wemple, Erik (8 December 2016), "Facebook's Sheryl Sandberg says people don't want 'hoax' news. Really?", The Washington Post, retrieved 11 December 2016
3. Weisburd, Andrew; Watts, Clint (6 August 2016), "Trolls for Trump - How Russia Dominates Your Twitter Feed to Promote Lies (And, Trump, Too)", The Daily Beast, retrieved 24 November 2016
4. LaCapria, Kim (2 November 2016), Snopes' Field Guide to Fake News Sites and Hoax Purveyors - Snopes.com's updated guide to the internet's clickbaiting, news-faking, social media exploiting dark side., Snopes.com, retrieved 19 November 2016
5. Lewis Sanders IV (11 October 2016), "'Divide Europe': European lawmakers warn of Russian propaganda", Deutsche Welle, retrieved 24 November 2016
6. Neudert, Lisa-Maria; Howard, Philip; Kollanyi, Bence (16 July 2019). "Sourcing and Automation of Political News and Information During Three European Elections". Social Media + Society. 5 (3): 205630511986314. doi:10.1177/2056305119863147.
7. Chen, Adrian (2015-06-02). "The Agency". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-12-25.
8. Vij, Shivam (2020-05-27). "India's anti-Muslim fake news factories are following the anti-Semitic playbook". ThePrint. Retrieved 2020-06-03.
9. Sahoo, Niranjan. "How fake news is complicating India's war against COVID-19". ORF. Retrieved 2020-06-03.
10. Connolly, Kate; Chrisafis, Angelique; McPherson, Poppy; Kirchgaessner, Stephanie; Haas, Benjamin; Phillips, Dominic; Hunt, Elle; Safi, Michael (2016-12-02). "Fake news: an insidious trend that's fast becoming a global problem". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2016-12-25.
11. "Merkel warns against fake news driving populist gains", Yahoo! News, Agence France-Presse, 23 November 2016, retrieved 23 November 2016
12. Paul Mozur; Mark Scott (17 November 2016), "Fake News on Facebook? In Foreign Elections, That's Not New", The New York Times, retrieved 18 November 2016
13. "Concern over barrage of fake Russian news in Sweden", The Local, 27 July 2016, retrieved 25 November 2016
14. Kragh, Martin; Åsberg, Sebastian (5 January 2017). "Russia's strategy for influence through public diplomacy and active measures: the Swedish case". Journal of Strategic Studies. 40 (6): 773–816. doi:10.1080/01402390.2016.1273830.
15. Frenkel, Sheera (20 November 2016), "This Is What Happens When Millions Of People Suddenly Get The Internet", BuzzFeed News, retrieved 28 November 2016
16. "Russian propaganda effort likely behind flood of fake news that preceded election", PBS NewsHour, Associated Press, 25 November 2016, retrieved 26 November 2016
17. "Russian propaganda campaign reportedly spread 'fake news' during US election", Nine News, Agence France-Presse, 26 November 2016, retrieved 26 November 2016
18. Chen, Adrian (27 July 2016), "The Real Paranoia-Inducing Purpose of Russian Hacks", The New Yorker, retrieved 26 November 2016
19. Tynan, Dan (24 August 2016), "How Facebook powers money machines for obscure political 'news' sites - From Macedonia to the San Francisco Bay, clickbait political sites are cashing in on Trumpmania – and they're getting a big boost from Facebook", The Guardian, retrieved 18 November 2016
20. Gilbert, Ben (15 November 2016), "Fed up with fake news, Facebook users are solving the problem with a simple list", Business Insider, retrieved 16 November 2016, Some of these sites are intended to look like real publications (there are false versions of major outlets like ABC and MSNBC) but share only fake news; others are straight-up propaganda created by foreign nations (Russia and Macedonia, among others).
21. Townsend, Tess (21 November 2016), "Meet the Romanian Trump Fan Behind a Major Fake News Site", Inc. magazine, ISSN 0162-8968, retrieved 23 November 2016
22. Sydell, Laura (23 November 2016), "We Tracked Down A Fake-News Creator In The Suburbs. Here's What We Learned", All Things Considered, National Public Radio, retrieved 26 November 2016
23. staff, THR (17 November 2016), "Facebook Fake News Writer Reveals How He Tricked Trump Supporters and Possibly Influenced Election", The Hollywood Reporter, retrieved 18 November 2016
24. Bump, Philip (14 November 2016), "Google's top news link for 'final election results' goes to a fake news site with false numbers", The Washington Post, retrieved 26 November 2016
25. Jacobson, Louis (14 November 2016), "No, Donald Trump is not beating Hillary Clinton in the popular vote", PolitiFact.com, retrieved 26 November 2016
26. Ali Watkins; Sheera Frenkel (30 November 2016), "Intel Officials Believe Russia Spreads Fake News", BuzzFeed News, retrieved 1 December 2016
27. Carlos Merlo (2017), "Millonario negocio FAKE NEWS", Univision Noticias
28. Strohm, Chris (1 December 2016), "Russia Weaponized Social Media in U.S. Election, FireEye Says", Bloomberg News, retrieved 1 December 2016
29. "Google and Facebook target fake news sites with advertising clampdown", Belfast Telegraph, 15 November 2016, retrieved 16 November 2016
30. Gunaratna, Shanika (15 November 2016), Facebook, Google announce new policies to fight fake news, CBS News, retrieved 16 November 2016
31. Silverman, Craig (15 December 2016), "Facebook Is Turning To Fact Checkers To Fight Fake News", BuzzFeed News, retrieved 15 December 2016
32. Ribeiro, John (14 November 2016), "Zuckerberg says fake news on Facebook didn't tilt the elections", Computerworld, retrieved 16 November 2016
33. Waterson, Jim (8 December 2016), "MI6 Chief Says Fake News And Online Propaganda Are A Threat To Democracy", BuzzFeed News, retrieved 11 December 2016
34. Tavernise, Sabrina (7 December 2016), "As Fake News Spreads Lies, More Readers Shrug at the Truth", The New York Times, p. A1, retrieved 9 December 2016, Narrowly defined, 'fake news' means a made-up story with an intention to deceive, often geared toward getting clicks.
35. Kertscher, Tom (13 December 2016), "PolitiFact's Lie of the Year 2016: Fake news", Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, retrieved 14 December 2016
36. Gelfert, Axel (2018), "Fake News: A Definition", Informal Logic Vol. 38, No. 1, 38, p. 109, doi:10.22329/il.v38i1.5068
37. Woolf, Christopher (December 8, 2017). "Back in the 1890s, fake news helped start a war". Public Radio International.
38. Soll, Jacob (December 18, 2016). "The Long and Brutal History of Fake News". Politico.
39. Chung-Yan, Chow (November 26, 2016). "How the Google and Facebook era drove news back to yellow press excesses". South China Morning Post.
40. Swartz, Jon; della Cava, Marco (December 2, 2016). "The Fake web: why we're so apt to believe fake news, apps and reviews". USA Today.
41. Mourão, Rachel R.; Robertson, Craig T. (2019). "Fake News as Discursive Integration: An Analysis of Sites That Publish False, Misleading, Hyperpartisan and Sensational Information". Journalism Studies. 20 (14): 2077–2095. doi:10.1080/1461670x.2019.1566871.
42. Graham, Bob (August 29, 2009). "World War II's first victim". The Telegraph.
43. Condliffe, Jamie (15 November 2016), "Facebook's Fake-News Ad Ban Is Not Enough", MIT Technology Review, retrieved 16 November 2016
44. Alexander Smith; Vladimir Banic (9 December 2016), Fake News: How a Partying Macedonian Teen Earns Thousands Publishing Lies, NBC News, retrieved 9 December 2016
45. In Macedonia's fake news hub, this teen shows how it's done, CBS News, Associated Press, 2 December 2016, retrieved 3 December 2016
46. Craig Silverman; Lawrence Alexander (3 November 2016), "How Teens In The Balkans Are Duping Trump Supporters With Fake News", BuzzFeed News, retrieved 16 November 2016
47. Ishmael N. Daro; Craig Silverman (15 November 2016), "Fake News Sites Are Not Terribly Worried About Google Kicking Them Off AdSense", BuzzFeed, retrieved 16 November 2016
48. Woolf, Christopher (16 November 2016), Kids in Macedonia made up and circulated many false news stories in the US election, Public Radio International, retrieved 18 November 2016
49. "Fake news machine gears up for 2020". CNN. September 12, 2017. Retrieved 25 May 2018.
50. Lewis Sanders IV (17 November 2016), "Fake news: Media's post-truth problem", Deutsche Welle, retrieved 24 November 2016
51. European Parliament Committee on Foreign Affairs (23 November 2016), "MEPs sound alarm on anti-EU propaganda from Russia and Islamist terrorist groups" (PDF), European Parliament, retrieved 26 November 2016
52. Surana, Kavitha (23 November 2016), "The EU Moves to Counter Russian Disinformation Campaign", Foreign Policy, ISSN 0015-7228, retrieved 24 November 2016
53. "EU Parliament Urges Fight Against Russia's 'Fake News'", Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Agence France-Presse and Reuters, 23 November 2016, retrieved 24 November 2016
54. Porter, Tom (28 November 2016), "How US and EU failings allowed Kremlin propaganda and fake news to spread through the West", International Business Times, retrieved 29 November 2016
55. Schindler, John R. (5 November 2015), "Obama Fails to Fight Putin's Propaganda Machine", New York Observer, retrieved 28 November 2016
56. Schindler, John R. (26 November 2016), "The Kremlin Didn't Sink Hillary—Obama Did", New York Observer, retrieved 28 November 2016
57. LoGiurato, Brett (29 April 2014), "Russia's Propaganda Channel Just Got A Journalism Lesson From The US State Department", Business Insider, retrieved 29 November 2016
58. LoGiurato, Brett (25 April 2014), "RT Is Very Upset With John Kerry For Blasting Them As Putin's 'Propaganda Bullhorn'", Business Insider, retrieved 29 November 2016
59. Stengel, Richard (29 April 2014), "Russia Today's Disinformation Campaign", Dipnote, United States Department of State, archived from the original on 2 May 2014, retrieved 28 November 2016
60. Dougherty, Jill (2 December 2016), The reality behind Russia's fake news, CNN, retrieved 2 December 2016
61. Benedictus, Leo (6 November 2016), "Invasion of the troll armies: from Russian Trump supporters to Turkish state stooges", The Guardian, retrieved 2 December 2016
62. "U.S. officials defend integrity of vote, despite hacking fears", WITN-TV, 26 November 2016, retrieved 2 December 2016
63. Andrew Weisburd; Clint Watts; JM Berger (6 November 2016), "Trolling for Trump: How Russia is Trying to Destroy Our Democracy", War on the Rocks, retrieved 6 December 2016
64. Frenkel, Sheera (4 November 2016), "US Officials Are More Worried About The Media Being Hacked Than The Ballot Box", BuzzFeed News, retrieved 2 December 2016
65. Ingram, Mathew, "No, Russian Agents Are Not Behind Every Piece of Fake News You See", Fortune, retrieved 8 December 2017
66. Schatz, Bryan, "The Kremlin Would Be Proud of Trump's Propaganda Playbook", Mother Jones, retrieved 2 December 2016
67. Harris, Shane (4 November 2016), "Vladimir Putin Wins the Election No Matter Who The Next President Is", The Daily Beast, retrieved 2 December 2016
68. Eunice Yoon; Barry Huang (22 November 2016), "China on US fake news debate: We told you so", CNBC, retrieved 28 November 2016
69. Cadell, Catherine (19 November 2016), "China says terrorism, fake news impel greater global internet curbs", Reuters, Reuters, retrieved 28 November 2016
70. Read, Max (27 November 2016), "Maybe the Internet Isn't a Fantastic Tool for Democracy After All", New York Magazine, retrieved 28 November 2016
71. Kirchner, Stephanie (14 December 2016), "Menace of fake news is rattling politicians in Austria and Germany", The Washington Post, retrieved 14 December 2016
72. Kate Connolly; Angelique Chrisafis; Poppy McPherson; Stephanie Kirchgaessner; Benjamin Haas; Dominic Phillips; Elle Hunt (2 December 2016), "Fake news: an insidious trend that's fast becoming a global problem - With fake online news dominating discussions after the US election, Guardian correspondents explain how it is distorting politics around the world", The Guardian, retrieved 2 December 2016
73. Cheadle, Bruce (17 November 2016), As fake news spreads, MPs consider importance of Canada's local papers, CTV News, The Canadian Press, retrieved 11 December 2016
74. Orlowski, Andrew (21 November 2016), "China cites Trump to justify 'fake news' media clampdown. Surprised?", The Register, retrieved 28 November 2016
75. Pascaline, Mary (20 November 2016), "Facebook Fake News Stories: China Calls For More Censorship On Internet Following Social Media's Alleged Role In US Election", International Business Times, retrieved 28 November 2016
76. Rauhala, Emily (17 November 2016), "After Trump, Americans want Facebook and Google to vet news. So does China.", The Washington Post, retrieved 28 November 2016
77. Dou, Eva (18 November 2016), "China Presses Tech Firms to Police the Internet - Third-annual World Internet Conference aimed at proselytizing China's view to global audience", The Wall Street Journal, retrieved 28 November 2016
78. "Helsinki to host hub aimed at curbing cyber warfare threats", Yle, 21 November 2016, retrieved 11 December 2016
79. Bivort, Antoine (21 October 2016). "Les trente sites politiques français ayant le plus d'audience sur le Web". Mediapart. Retrieved 11 December 2016.
80. Bivort, Antoine (1 December 2016). "" Fake Traffic " ? Quelle fiabilité pour le classement des sites socio-politiques ?". Mediapart. Retrieved 11 December 2016.
81. Murdock, Jason (30 November 2016), "Russian hackers may disrupt Germany's 2017 election warns spy chief", International Business Times UK edition, retrieved 1 December 2016
82. "India's Disinformation War More Complex Than in West: Oxford Prof". The Quint. 6 October 2018. Retrieved 27 August 2019.
83. Mohan, Shriya (26 April 2019). "Everybody needs a good lie". Business Line. Retrieved 28 August 2019.
84. Perrigo, Billy (25 January 2019). "How Whatsapp Is Fueling Fake News Ahead of India's Elections". Time.
85. "Disinformation Is Spreading on WhatsApp in India—And It's Getting Dangerous". Pulitzer Center. 5 September 2018. Retrieved 28 August 2019.
86. Khurana, Pooja; Kumar, Deepak; Kumar, Sanjeev (April 2019). "Research of Fake News Spreading Through Whatsapp" (PDF). International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering. 8 (6S4): 948–951. doi:10.35940/ijitee.F1193.0486S419 – via ijitee.org.
87. Jain, Rishabh R. (9 April 2019). "In India's Election, Voters Feed on False Information". Bloomberg. Retrieved 29 August 2019.
88. "WhatsApp FAQ – Contributing to the safety of elections in India". WhatsApp. Retrieved 28 August 2019.
89. "WhatsApp in India: Scourge of violence-inciting fake news tough to tackle". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
90. "WhatsApp: The 'black hole' of fake news in India's election". BBC News. 2019-04-06. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
91. "Alarming lessons from Facebook's push to stop fake news in India". The Economic Times. 2019-05-21. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
92. E, Chiluwa, Innocent; A, Samoilenko, Sergei (28 June 2019). "Handbook of Research on Deception, Fake News, and Misinformation Online". IGI Global. p. 236 – via Google Books.
93. Mihindukulasuriya, Regina (2020-01-31). "Nearly 18,000 Twitter accounts spread 'fake news' for BJP, 147 do it for Congress: Study". ThePrint. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
94. Service, Tribune News. "BJP on backfoot on migrants issue and 'fake' news targeting minorities". Tribune India. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
95. "From spreading fake news on JNU to garnering support for CAA through dubious claims, netizens are calling out BJP's IT Cell". Firstpost. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
96. Kumar, Basant. "Fake news, lies, Muslim bashing, and Ravish Kumar: Inside OpIndia's harrowing world". Newslaundry. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
97. Vij, Shivam (2020-05-27). "India's anti-Muslim fake news factories are following the anti-Semitic playbook". ThePrint. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
98. Surendran, Vivek (30 March 2018). "Postcard News editor arrested for spreading fake news, BJP leaders call for release". India Today. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
99. Dutta, Amrita Nayak (2019-05-02). "Postcard, Indiatimes in Poynter list of 513 'fake news' websites". ThePrint. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
100. Horowitz, Jason (2 December 2016), "Spread of Fake News Provokes Anxiety in Italy", The New York Times, retrieved 3 December 2016
101. Ivana Kottasova, Nina dos Santos and James Frater (5 December 2016), Did fake news influence Italy's referendum?, CNN Money, retrieved 6 December 2016
102. "La notizia più condivisa sul referendum? È una bufala", Pagella Politica (in Italian), pagellapolitica.it, retrieved 2 December 2016
103. Anderson, Ariston (30 November 2016), "Italy's Populist Party Found to Be Leader in Europe for Fake News", The Hollywood Reporter, retrieved 3 December 2016
104. Alberto Nardelli; Craig Silverman (29 November 2016), "Italy's Most Popular Political Party Is Leading Europe In Fake News And Kremlin Propaganda", BuzzFeed News, retrieved 3 December 2016
105. "Fake Polls as Fake News: The Challenge for Mexico's Elections". Wilson Center.
106. "Doctored Video Goes Viral Ahead of Elections in Moldova". Medium. 13 May 2018.
107. The fake pictures of the Rohingya crisis, BBC News, 6 June 2015, retrieved 8 December 2016
108. Goldman, Russell (December 24, 2016). "Reading Fake News, Pakistani Minister Directs Nuclear Threat at Israel". The New York Times. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
109. Politi, Daniel (December 26, 2016). "A Fake News Story Leads Pakistani Minister to Issue Nuclear Threat Against Israel". Slate. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
110. "Russian propaganda entering mainstream news: disinformation experts", Radio Poland, 18 November 2016, retrieved 11 December 2016
111. "Ministerstwo: Nie wchodźcie na tę stronę, to fake news". www.tvp.info (in Polish). Retrieved 2020-07-27.
112. "Fake light show in video lures thousands to Shihmen Reservoir", The China Post, 17 December 2015, retrieved 12 December 2016
113. Chimbelu, Chiponda (5 June 2014), "Fake news can ruin lives, says Stopfake.org founder", Deutsche Welle
114. Waterson, Jim (22 November 2016), "Labour Is Promising A Long Campaign Against Fake News", BuzzFeed News, retrieved 11 December 2016
115. Watson, Tom (22 November 2016), "'Fake news' is changing the way we see the world. We have to face up to what that means", The Independent, retrieved 11 December 2016
116. Le Conte, Marie (29 November 2016), "The Government Says It's Looking Into Fake News", BuzzFeed News, retrieved 11 December 2016
117. Tapper, Jake (17 November 2016), Fake news stories thriving on social media - Phony news stories are thriving on social media, so much so President Obama addressed it. CNN's Jake Tapper reports., CNN, retrieved 18 November 2016
118. Gardiner Harris; Melissa Eddy (17 November 2016), "Obama, With Angela Merkel in Berlin, Assails Spread of Fake News", The New York Times, retrieved 18 November 2016
119. Newcomb, Alyssa (15 November 2016), "Facebook, Google Crack Down on Fake News Advertising", NBC News, NBC News, retrieved 16 November 2016
120. Schaede, Sydney (24 October 2016), "Did the Pope Endorse Trump?", FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, retrieved 7 December 2016
121. Dewey, Caitlin (17 November 2016), "Facebook fake-news writer: 'I think Donald Trump is in the White House because of me'", The Washington Post, ISSN 0190-8286, retrieved 17 November 2016
122. Drum, Kevin (17 November 2016), "Meet Ret. General Michael Flynn, the Most Gullible Guy in the Army", Mother Jones, retrieved 18 November 2016
123. Masnick, Mike (14 October 2016), "Donald Trump's Son & Campaign Manager Both Tweet Obviously Fake Story", Techdirt, retrieved 18 November 2016
124. Holliway, Kali (12 January 2017). "14 Fake News Stories Created or Publicized by Donald Trump". AlterNet. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
125. Peters, Jeremy W. (25 December 2016). "Wielding Claims of 'Fake News,' Conservatives Take Aim at Mainstream Media". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 December 2016.
126. Rapoza, Kenneth (7 December 2016), "Fake News In Russia: 'Obama Threatens Sanctions Due To Russia's Role In Syria'", Forbes, retrieved 10 December 2016
127. Miller, Kevin (1 December 2016), "Angus King: Russian involvement in U.S. election 'an arrow aimed at the heart of democracy'", Portland Press Herald, retrieved 2 December 2016
128. "Obama orders full review of 2016 election cyber-attacks", The Japan Times, Agence France-Presse, 11 December 2016, retrieved 11 December 2016
129. Staff report (30 November 2016), "Angus King among senators asking president to declassify information about Russia and election", Portland Press Herald, retrieved 2 December 2016
130. Timberg, Craig (30 November 2016), "Effort to combat foreign propaganda advances in Congress", The Washington Post, retrieved 1 December 2016
131. Porter, Tom (1 December 2016), "US House of representatives backs proposal to counter global Russian subversion", International Business Times UK edition, retrieved 1 December 2016
132. Demirjian, Karoun (8 December 2016), "Republicans ready to launch wide-ranging probe of Russia, despite Trump's stance", Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, retrieved 10 December 2016
133. President Barack Obama (7 November 2016), Remarks by the President at Hillary for America Rally in Ann Arbor, Michigan, White House Office of the Press Secretary, retrieved 16 November 2016
134. Chris Sanchez; Bryan Logan (9 December 2016), "The CIA says it has evidence that Russia tried to help Trump win the US election", Business Insider, retrieved 10 December 2016, In addition to the release of hacked emails, a flood of disinformation and conspiracy theories was widely circulated on the internet in the form of false stories that were peddled as news. Much of that fake news—which almost exclusively targeted Hillary Clinton—gained tremendous popularity on social networks like Facebook for months leading up to November 8. News of the CIA’s findings came as President Barack Obama ordered a complete review of the matter Friday.
135. Dovere, Edward-Isaac (16 December 2016), "Obama: Trump's victory threatens America's core", Politico, retrieved 17 December 2016, If fake news that's being released by some foreign government is almost identical to reports that are being issued through partisan news venues, then it's not surprising that that foreign propaganda will have a greater effect.
136. Wendling, Mike (2 December 2016), "The saga of 'Pizzagate': The fake story that shows how conspiracy theories spread", BBC News, retrieved 2 December 2016
137. LaCapria, Kim (21 November 2016), "FALSE: Comet Ping Pong Pizzeria Home to Child Abuse Ring Led by Hillary Clinton", Snopes.com, retrieved 2 December 2016
138. Carlson, Margaret (23 November 2016), "A Fake Conspiracy for Our Fevered Age", Bloomberg View, retrieved 29 November 2016
139. Svrluga, Susan; Siddiqui, Faiz (4 December 2016), "N.C. man told police he went to D.C. pizzeria with assault rifle to 'self-investigate' election-related conspiracy theory", The Washington Post, retrieved 6 December 2016
140. "Man with rifle arrested at DC restaurant targeted by fake news conspiracy theories". Fox News. December 5, 2016. Retrieved December 9, 2016.
141. Kang, Cecilia (21 November 2016), "This Pizzeria Is Not a Child-Trafficking Site", The New York Times
142. Kurzius, Rachel (2 December 2016), "Comet Ping Pong Increases Concert Security In Response To Pizzagate", DCist, archived from the original on 4 December 2016, retrieved 3 December 2016
143. Ingram, Hunter (5 December 2016), "D.C. pizza place shooter a former CFCC student, local actor", Wilmington Star News, retrieved 6 December 2016
144. "Charges filed against suspected 'Pizzagate' gunman", CBS News, Associated Press, 5 December 2016, retrieved 6 December 2016
145. Bender, Bryan; Hanna, Andrew (5 December 2016), "Flynn under fire for fake news", Politico, retrieved December 5, 2016
146. Smith, Allan (5 December 2016), "Michael Flynn's son spars with Jake Tapper over fake 'pizzagate' story that led armed man to go to restaurant", Business Insider, retrieved 5 December 2016
147. Rosenberg, Matthew (5 December 2016), "Trump Adviser Has Pushed Clinton Conspiracy Theories", The New York Times, retrieved 6 December 2016
148. Rosenberg, Matthew (6 December 2016), "Trump Fires Senior Adviser's Son From Transition for Sharing Fake News", The New York Times, retrieved 7 December 2016
149. Faulders, Katherine (6 December 2016), "Mike Flynn Jr. Forced Out of Trump Transition Amid Fake News Controversy", ABC News, retrieved 7 December 2016
150. Kane, Paul (8 December 2016), "Hillary Clinton attacks 'fake news' in post-election appearance on Capitol Hill", The Washington Post, retrieved 9 December 2016
151. "Hillary Clinton warns of 'fake news epidemic'", BBC News, 9 December 2016, retrieved 9 December 2016
152. Liotsiou, Dimitra; Kollanyi, Bence; Howard, Philip N. (2019). "The Junk News Aggregator: Examining junk news posted on Facebook, starting with the 2018 US Midterm Elections". arXiv:1901.07920 [cs.SI].
153. Lori Robertson; Eugene Kiely (18 November 2016), "How to Spot Fake News", FactCheck.org, retrieved 19 November 2016
154. Sharockman, Aaron (16 November 2016), Let's fight back against fake news, PolitiFact.com, retrieved 19 November 2016
155. Stelter, Brian (7 November 2016), "How Donald Trump made fact-checking great again", CNNMoney, CNN, retrieved 19 November 2016
156. Kessler, Glenn (10 November 2016), "Fact checking in the aftermath of a historic election", The Washington Post, retrieved 19 November 2016
157. Burgess, Matt (17 November 2016), "Google is helping Full Fact create an automated, real-time fact-checker", Wired magazine UK edition, retrieved 29 November 2016
158. Woodall, Candy (14 December 2016), "Here's the biggest lie of the year", The Patriot-News, retrieved 14 December 2016
159. Wingfield, Nick; Isaac, Mike; Benner, Katie (14 November 2016), "Google and Facebook Take Aim at Fake News Sites", The New York Times, retrieved 28 November 2016
160. Sheth, Sonam (14 November 2016), "Google looking into grossly inaccurate top news search result displayed as final popular-vote tally", Business Insider, retrieved 16 November 2016
161. "Google to ban fake news sites from its advertising network", Los Angeles Times, Associated Press, 14 November 2016, retrieved 16 November 2016
162. Hartmans, Avery (15 November 2016), "Google's CEO says fake news could have swung the election", Business Insider, retrieved 16 November 2016
163. "Google cracks down on fake news sites", The Straits Times, 15 November 2016, retrieved 16 November 2016
164. Waters, Richard (15 November 2016), "Facebook and Google to restrict ads on fake news sites", Financial Times, retrieved 16 November 2016
165. Ramaswamy, Sridhar (21 January 2016), "How we fought bad ads in 2015", Google blog, retrieved 28 November 2016
166. Gomes, Ben (2017-04-25). "Our latest quality improvements for Search". Google Blog.
167. Damon, Andre. "New Google algorithm restricts access to left-wing, progressive web sites". World Socialist Web Site. International Committee of the Fourth International.
168. North, David. "An open letter to Google: Stop the censorship of the Internet! Stop the political blacklisting of the World Socialist Web Site!". World Socialist Web Site. International Committee of the Fourth International.
169. Blake, Paul (15 November 2016), Google, Facebook Move to Block Fake News From Ad Services, ABC News, retrieved 16 November 2016
170. Hall, Gina (15 November 2016), "Facebook staffers form an unofficial task force to look into fake news problem", Silicon Valley Business Journal, retrieved 16 November 2016
171. Frenkel, Sheera (14 November 2016), "Renegade Facebook Employees Form Task Force To Battle Fake News", BuzzFeed, retrieved 18 November 2016
172. Shahani, Aarti (15 November 2016), Facebook, Google Take Steps To Confront Fake News, National Public Radio, retrieved 20 November 2016
173. Cooke, Kristina (15 November 2016), "Google, Facebook move to restrict ads on fake news sites", Reuters, Reuters, retrieved 20 November 2016
174. "Facebook's Fake News Problem: What's Its Responsibility?", The New York Times, Associated Press, 15 November 2016, retrieved 20 November 2016
175. Ohlheiser, Abby (19 November 2016), "Mark Zuckerberg outlines Facebook's ideas to battle fake news", The Washington Post, retrieved 19 November 2016
176. Vladimirov, Nikita (19 November 2016), "Zuckerberg outlines Facebook's plan to fight fake news", The Hill, ISSN 1521-1568, retrieved 19 November 2016
177. Isaac, Mike (19 November 2016), "Facebook Considering Ways to Combat Fake News, Mark Zuckerberg Says", The New York Times, retrieved 19 November 2016
178. Burke, Samuel (19 November 2016), Zuckerberg: Facebook will develop tools to fight fake news, CNNMoney, retrieved 19 November 2016
179. Chappell, Bill (19 November 2016), "'Misinformation' On Facebook: Zuckerberg Lists Ways Of Fighting Fake News", National Public Radio, retrieved 19 November 2016
180. Silverman, Craig (19 November 2016), "This Is How You Can Stop Fake News From Spreading On Facebook", BuzzFeed, retrieved 20 November 2016
181. Taylor Hatmaker; Josh Constine (1 December 2016), "Facebook quietly tests warnings on fake news", TechCrunch, retrieved 2 December 2016
182. "False news items are not the only problem besetting Facebook", The Economist, 26 November 2016, retrieved 28 November 2016
183. Pesek, William (27 November 2016), "Will Facebook be China's propaganda tool?", The Japan Times, Barron's newspaper, retrieved 28 November 2016
184. Klasfeld, Adam (22 November 2016), Fake News Gives Facebook a Nixon-Goes-to-China Moment, Courthouse News Service, retrieved 28 November 2016
185. Hare, Kristen (September 21, 2015), Poynter names director and editor for new International Fact-Checking Network, Poynter Institute for Media Studies, retrieved 20 November 2016
186. About the International Fact-Checking Network, Poynter Institute for Media Studies, 2016, archived from the original on 20 November 2016, retrieved 20 November 2016
187. Neidig, Harper (17 November 2016), "Fact-checkers call on Zuckerberg to address spread of fake news", The Hill, ISSN 1521-1568, retrieved 19 November 2016
188. The International Fact-Checking Network (17 November 2016), An open letter to Mark Zuckerberg from the world's fact-checkers, Poynter Institute, retrieved 19 November 2016
189. Chappell, Bill (15 December 2016), "Facebook Details Its New Plan To Combat Fake News Stories", National Public Radio
190. Heath, Alex (15 December 2016), "Facebook is going to use Snopes and other fact checkers to combat and bury 'fake news'", Business Insider, retrieved 15 December 2016
191. Feldman, Brian (15 November 2016), "Here's a Chrome Extension That Will Flag Fake-News Sites for You", New York Magazine, retrieved 16 November 2016
192. Morris, David Z. (27 November 2016), "Eli Pariser's Crowdsourced Brain Trust Is Tackling Fake News", Fortune magazine, retrieved 28 November 2016
193. Burgess, Matt (25 November 2016), "Hive mind assemble! There is now a crowdsourcing campaign to solve the problem of fake news", Wired magazine UK edition, retrieved 29 November 2016
194. Ingram, Matthew (21 November 2016), "Facebook Doesn't Need One Editor, It Needs 1,000 of Them", Fortune magazine, retrieved 29 November 2016
195. "Pope Warns About Fake News-From Experience", The New York Times, Associated Press, 7 December 2016, retrieved 7 December 2016
196. Pullella, Philip (7 December 2016), Pope warns media over 'sin' of spreading fake news, smearing politicians, Reuters, retrieved 7 December 2016
197. Zauzmer, Julie (7 December 2016), "Pope Francis compares media that spread fake news to people who are excited by feces", The Washington Post, retrieved 7 December 2016
198. "Pope Francis compares fake news consumption to eating faeces", The Guardian, 7 December 2016, retrieved 7 December 2016
199. Griffin, Andrew (7 December 2016), "Pope Francis: Fake news is like getting sexually aroused by faeces", The Independent, retrieved 7 December 2016
200. Silverman, Craig (16 November 2016), "Viral Fake Election News Outperformed Real News On Facebook In Final Months Of The US Election", BuzzFeed, retrieved 16 November 2016
201. "Google, Facebook move to curb ads on fake news sites", Kuwait Times, Reuters, 15 November 2016, retrieved 16 November 2016
202. Menczer, Filippo (28 November 2016), "Fake Online News Spreads Through Social Echo Chambers", Scientific American, The Conversation, retrieved 29 November 2016
203. Perry, Douglas (15 November 2016), "Facebook, Google try to drain the fake-news swamp without angering partisans", The Oregonian, retrieved 16 November 2016
204. Profile: Melissa "Mish" Zimdars, Merrimack College, retrieved 28 November 2019
205. Zimdars, Melissa (2016), Earliest (November 16th 2016) version of Zimdars' list, archived from the original on 2016-11-16, retrieved 28 November 2019
206. Roy, Jessica (2016), Want to keep fake news out of your newsfeed? College professor creates list of sites to avoid, The Los Angeles Times, archived from the original on 2016-11-16, retrieved 28 November 2019
207. Hoyt, James (2016), So about that viral list of fake news sites ..., USA Today, retrieved 28 November 2019
208. Zimdars, Melissa (2017), False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and/or Satirical "News" Sources, Melissa Zimdars, retrieved 28 November 2019
209. Domonoske, Camila (23 November 2016), "Students Have 'Dismaying' Inability To Tell Fake News From Real, Study Finds", National Public Radio, retrieved 25 November 2016
210. McEvers, Kelly (22 November 2016), "Stanford Study Finds Most Students Vulnerable To Fake News", National Public Radio, retrieved 25 November 2016
211. Shellenbarger, Sue (21 November 2016), "Most Students Don't Know When News Is Fake, Stanford Study Finds", The Wall Street Journal, retrieved 29 November 2016
212. Guess, Andrew; Nagler, Jonathan; Tucker, Joshua (9 January 2019). "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook". Science Advances. 5 (1): eaau4586. Bibcode:2019SciA....5.4586G. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau4586. PMC 6326755. PMID 30662946.
213. Grinberg, Nir; Joseph, Kenneth; Friedland, Lisa; Swire-Thompson, Briony; Lazer, David (25 January 2019). "Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election". Science. 363 (6425): 374–378. Bibcode:2019Sci...363..374G. doi:10.1126/science.aau2706. PMID 30679368.
214. Willingham, Emily (28 November 2016), "A Scientific Approach To Distinguishing Real From Fake News", Forbes magazine, retrieved 29 November 2016
215. Frazier, Kendrick (2019). "Engagement with Fake News Extremely Concentrated, New Study Finds". Skeptical Inquirer. 43 (3): 10–11.

Further reading

• Condliffe, Jamie (15 November 2016), "Facebook's Fake-News Ad Ban Is Not Enough", MIT Technology Review, retrieved 16 November 2016
• Lazer, David M. J.; Baum, Matthew A.; Benkler, Yochai; Berinsky, Adam J.; Greenhill, Kelly M.; Menczer, Filippo; Metzger, Miriam J.; Nyhan, Brendan; Pennycook, Gordon; Rothschild, David; Schudson, Michael; Sloman, Steven A.; Sunstein, Cass R.; Thorson, Emily A.; Watts, Duncan J.; Zittrain, Jonathan L. (9 March 2018). "The science of fake news". Science. 359 (6380): 1094–1096. doi:10.1126/science.aao2998. PMID 29590025.
• Jaramillo, Cassandra (15 November 2016), "How to break it to your friends and family that they're sharing fake news", The Dallas Morning News, retrieved 16 November 2016
• Final report of the EU Commission's High Level Expert Group on Fake News and Online Disinformation. March 2018.
• Craig Silverman; Lawrence Alexander (3 November 2016), "How Teens In The Balkans Are Duping Trump Supporters With Fake News", BuzzFeed, retrieved 16 November 2016
• Ishmael N. Daro; Craig Silverman (15 November 2016), "Fake News Sites Are Not Terribly Worried About Google Kicking Them Off AdSense", BuzzFeed, retrieved 16 November 2016
• Silverman, Craig (16 November 2016), "Viral Fake Election News Outperformed Real News On Facebook In Final Months Of The US Election", BuzzFeed, retrieved 16 November 2016
• Taylor, Adam (26 November 2016), "Before 'fake news,' there was Soviet 'disinformation'", The Washington Post, retrieved 3 December 2016
• Andrew Weisburd, Clint Watts; JM Berger (6 November 2016), "Trolling for Trump: How Russia is Trying to Destroy Our Democracy", War on the Rocks, retrieved 6 December 2016

External links

Guides to avoid fake news online

• LaCapria, Kim (2 November 2016), "Snopes' Field Guide to Fake News Sites and Hoax Purveyors", Snopes.com, snopes.com, retrieved 16 November 2016
• Dicker, Rachel (14 November 2016), "Avoid These Fake News Sites at All Costs", U.S. News & World Report, retrieved 16 November 2016
• Lori Robertson; Eugene Kiely (18 November 2016), "How to Spot Fake News", FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, retrieved 19 November 2016
• Keller, Jared (19 November 2016), "This Critique of Fake Election News Is a Must-Read for All Democracy Lovers", Mother Jones, retrieved 19 November 2016
• Ulanoff, Lance (18 November 2016), "7 signs the news you're sharing is fake", Mashable, retrieved 19 November 2016
• Hautala, Laura (19 November 2016), "How to avoid getting conned by fake news sites - Here's how you can identify and avoid sites that just want to serve up ads next to outright falsehoods.", CNET, retrieved 19 November 2016

Videos

• Sreenivasan, Hari (17 November 2016), "How online hoaxes and fake news played a role in the election", PBS NewsHour (video), retrieved 29 November 2016
• "Fake News: How A Partying Macedonian Teen Earns Thousands Publishing Lies", NBC News (video), 9 December 2016, retrieved 11 December 2016, Exclusive: The 18-year-old, who lives in the small Eastern European town of Veles, says he made at least $60,000 in the past six months by mainly appealing to Donald Trump supporters.
• Jenkins, Ciaran (8 December 2016), "How fake news from Macedonia affected the US Presidential Election 2016", Channel 4 News (video), retrieved 11 December 2016, Did you read a fake news story during the US Presidential election? Well, it could have been written by a 16-year-old in Macedonia. Channel 4 News' Ciaran Jenkins visits the village of Veles to investigate.
• Silverman, Craig (9 August 2016), "How This Teen Tricked The Internet With Fake News", BuzzFeed Video (video), retrieved 11 December 2016