Facial recognition system

A facial recognition system is a technology capable of identifying or verifying a person from a digital image or a video frame from a video source. There are multiple methods in which facial recognition systems work, but in general, they work by comparing selected facial features from given image with faces within a database. It is also described as a Biometric Artificial Intelligence based application that can uniquely identify a person by analyzing patterns based on the person's facial textures and shape.[1][2][3]

"Face recognition" redirects here. For the human cognitive process, see Face perception. For other uses, see Facial recognition.
Swiss European surveillance: face recognition and vehicle make, model, color and license plate reader
Close-up of the infrared illuminator. The light is invisible to the human eye, but creates a day-like environment for the surveillance cameras.

While initially a form of computer application, it has seen wider uses in recent times on mobile platforms and in other forms of technology, such as robotics. It is typically used as access control in security systems and can be compared to other biometrics such as fingerprint or eye iris recognition systems.[4] Although the accuracy of facial recognition system as a biometric technology is lower than iris recognition and fingerprint recognition, it is widely adopted due to its contactless and non-invasive process.[5] Recently, it has also become popular as a commercial identification and marketing tool.[6] Other applications include advanced human-computer interaction, video surveillance, automatic indexing of images, and video database, among others.[7]

History of facial recognitional technology

Pioneers of automated face recognition include Woody Bledsoe, Helen Chan Wolf, and Charles Bisson.

During 1964 and 1965, Bledsoe, along with Helen Chan and Charles Bisson, worked on using the computer to recognize human faces (Bledsoe 1966a, 1966b; Bledsoe and Chan 1965). He was proud of this work, but because the funding was provided by an unnamed intelligence agency that did not allow much publicity, little of the work was published.[8] Based on the available references, it was revealed that the Bledsoe's initial approach involved the manual marking of various landmarks on the face such as the eye centers, mouth, etc., and these were mathematically rotated by computer to compensate for pose variation.[8] The distances between landmarks were also automatically computed and compared between images to determine identity.[8]

Given a large database of images (in effect, a book of mug shots) and a photograph, the problem was to select from the database a small set of records such that one of the image records matched the photograph. The success of the method could be measured in terms of the ratio of the answer list to the number of records in the database. Bledsoe (1966a) described the following difficulties:

This recognition problem is made difficult by the great variability in head rotation and tilt, lighting intensity and angle, facial expression, aging, etc. Some other attempts at face recognition by machine have allowed for little or no variability in these quantities. Yet the method of correlation (or pattern matching) of unprocessed optical data, which is often used by some researchers, is certain to fail in cases where the variability is great. In particular, the correlation is very low between two pictures of the same person with two different head rotations.

— Woody Bledsoe, 1966

This project was labeled man-machine because the human extracted the coordinates of a set of features from the photographs, which were then used by the computer for recognition. Using a graphics tablet (GRAFACON or RAND TABLET), the operator would extract the coordinates of features such as the center of pupils, the inside corner of eyes, the outside corner of eyes, point of widows peak, and so on. From these coordinates, a list of 20 distances, such as the width of mouth and width of eyes, pupil to pupil, were computed. These operators could process about 40 pictures an hour. When building the database, the name of the person in the photograph was associated with the list of computed distances and stored in the computer. In the recognition phase, the set of distances was compared with the corresponding distance for each photograph, yielding a distance between the photograph and the database record. The closest records are returned.

Because it is unlikely that any two pictures would match in head rotation, lean, tilt, and scale (distance from the camera), each set of distances is normalized to represent the face in a frontal orientation. To accomplish this normalization, the program first tries to determine the tilt, the lean, and the rotation. Then, using these angles, the computer undoes the effect of these transformations on the computed distances. To compute these angles, the computer must know the three-dimensional geometry of the head. Because the actual heads were unavailable, Bledsoe (1964) used a standard head derived from measurements on seven heads.

After Bledsoe left PRI in 1966, this work was continued at the Stanford Research Institute, primarily by Peter Hart. In experiments performed on a database of over 2000 photographs, the computer consistently outperformed humans when presented with the same recognition tasks (Bledsoe 1968). Peter Hart (1996) enthusiastically recalled the project with the exclamation, "It really worked!"

By about 1997, the system developed by Christoph von der Malsburg and graduate students of the University of Bochum in Germany and the University of Southern California in the United States outperformed most systems with those of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Maryland rated next. The Bochum system was developed through funding by the United States Army Research Laboratory. The software was sold as ZN-Face and used by customers such as Deutsche Bank and operators of airports and other busy locations. The software was "robust enough to make identifications from less-than-perfect face views. It can also often see through such impediments to identification as mustaches, beards, changed hairstyles and glasses—even sunglasses".[9]

In 2006, the performance of the latest face recognition algorithms was evaluated in the Face Recognition Grand Challenge (FRGC). High-resolution face images, 3-D face scans, and iris images were used in the tests. The results indicated that the new algorithms are 10 times more accurate than the face recognition algorithms of 2002 and 100 times more accurate than those of 1995. Some of the algorithms were able to outperform human participants in recognizing faces and could uniquely identify identical twins.[10][11]

U.S. Government-sponsored evaluations and challenge problems[12] have helped spur over two orders-of-magnitude in face-recognition system performance. Since 1993, the error rate of automatic face-recognition systems has decreased by a factor of 272. The reduction applies to systems that match people with face images captured in studio or mugshot environments. In Moore's law terms, the error rate decreased by one-half every two years.[13]

Low-resolution images of faces can be enhanced using face hallucination.

Techniques for face acquisition

Essentially, the process of face recognition is performed in two steps. The first involves feature extraction and selection and the second is the classification of objects.[7] Later developments introduced varying technologies to the procedure. Some of the most notable include the following techniques:

Traditional

Some face recognition algorithms identify facial features by extracting landmarks, or features, from an image of the subject's face. For example, an algorithm may analyze the relative position, size, and/or shape of the eyes, nose, cheekbones, and jaw.[14] These features are then used to search for other images with matching features.[15]

Other algorithms normalize a gallery of face images and then compress the face data, only saving the data in the image that is useful for face recognition. A probe image is then compared with the face data.[16] One of the earliest successful systems[17] is based on template matching techniques[18] applied to a set of salient facial features, providing a sort of compressed face representation.

Recognition algorithms can be divided into two main approaches: geometric, which looks at distinguishing features, or photometric, which is a statistical approach that distills an image into values and compares the values with templates to eliminate variances. Some classify these algorithms into two broad categories: holistic and feature-based models. The former attempts to recognize the face in its entirety while the feature-based subdivide into components such as according to features and analyze each as well as its spatial location with respect to other features.[19]

Popular recognition algorithms include principal component analysis using eigenfaces, linear discriminant analysis, elastic bunch graph matching using the Fisherface algorithm, the hidden Markov model, the multilinear subspace learning using tensor representation, and the neuronal motivated dynamic link matching.

3-Dimensional recognition

Three-dimensional face recognition technique uses 3D sensors to capture information about the shape of a face. This information is then used to identify distinctive features on the surface of a face, such as the contour of the eye sockets, nose, and chin.[10]

One advantage of 3D face recognition is that it is not affected by changes in lighting like other techniques. It can also identify a face from a range of viewing angles, including a profile view.[10][15] Three-dimensional data points from a face vastly improve the precision of face recognition. 3D research is enhanced by the development of sophisticated sensors that do a better job of capturing 3D face imagery. The sensors work by projecting structured light onto the face. Up to a dozen or more of these image sensors can be placed on the same CMOS chip—each sensor captures a different part of the spectrum....[13]

Even a perfect 3D matching technique could be sensitive to expressions. For that goal a group at the Technion applied tools from metric geometry to treat expressions as isometries[20]

A new method is to introduce a way to capture a 3D picture by using three tracking cameras that point at different angles; one camera will be pointing at the front of the subject, second one to the side, and third one at an angle. All these cameras will work together so it can track a subject's face in real time and be able to face detect and recognize.[21]

Skin texture analysis

Another emerging trend uses the visual details of the skin, as captured in standard digital or scanned images. This technique, called Skin Texture Analysis, turns the unique lines, patterns, and spots apparent in a person's skin into a mathematical space.[15]

Surface Texture Analysis works much the same way facial recognition does. A picture is taken of a patch oasda distinguish any lines, pores and the actual skin texture. It can identify the contrast between identical pairs, which are not yet possible using facial recognition software alone.[22]

Tests have shown that with the addition of skin texture analysis, performance in recognizing faces can increase 20 to 25 percent.[10][15]

Facial recognition combining different techniques

As every method has its advantages and disadvantages, technology companies have amalgamated the traditional, 3D recognition and Skin Textual Analysis, to create recognition systems that have higher rates of success.

Combined techniques have an advantage over other systems. It is relatively insensitive to changes in expression, including blinking, frowning or smiling and has the ability to compensate for mustache or beard growth and the appearance of eyeglasses. The system is also uniform with respect to race and gender.[22]

Thermal cameras

A different form of taking input data for face recognition is by using thermal cameras, by this procedure the cameras will only detect the shape of the head and it will ignore the subject accessories such as glasses, hats, or makeup.[23] Unlike conventional cameras, thermal cameras can capture facial imagery even in low-light and nighttime conditions without using a flash and exposing the position of the camera.[24] However, a problem with using thermal pictures for face recognition is that the databases for face recognition is limited. Diego Socolinsky and Andrea Selinger (2004) research the use of thermal face recognition in real life and operation sceneries, and at the same time build a new database of thermal face images. The research uses low-sensitive, low-resolution ferroelectric electrics sensors that are capable of acquiring long-wave thermal infrared (LWIR). The results show that a fusion of LWIR and regular visual cameras has greater results in outdoor probes. Indoor results show that visual has a 97.05% accuracy, while LWIR has 93.93%, and the fusion has 98.40%, however on the outdoor proves visual has 67.06%, LWIR 83.03%, and fusion has 89.02%. The study used 240 subjects over a period of 10 weeks to create a new database. The data was collected on sunny, rainy, and cloudy days.[23]

In 2018, researchers from the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) developed a technique that would allow them to match facial imagery obtained using a thermal camera with those in databases that were captured using a conventional camera. This approach utilized artificial intelligence and machine learning to allow researchers to visibly compare conventional and thermal facial imagery.[25] Known as a cross-spectrum synthesis method due to how it bridges facial recognition from two different imaging modalities, this method synthesize a single image by analyzing multiple facial regions and details.[26] It consists of a non-linear regression model that maps a specific thermal image into a corresponding visible facial image and an optimization issue that projects the latent projection back into the image space.[24]

ARL scientists have noted that the approach works by combining global information (i.e. features across the entire face) with local information (i.e. features regarding the eyes, nose, and mouth). In addition to enhancing the discriminability of the synthesized image, the facial recognition system can be used to transform a thermal face signature into a refined visible image of a face.[27] According to performance tests conducted at ARL, researchers found that the multi-region cross-spectrum synthesis model demonstrated a performance improvement of about 30% over baseline methods and about 5% over state-of-the-art methods. It has also been tested for landmark detection for thermal images.[26]

Application

Mobile platforms

Social media

Social media platforms have adopted facial recognition capabilities to diversify their functionalities in order to attract a wider user base amidst stiff competition from different applications.

Founded in 2013, Looksery went on to raise money for its face modification app on Kickstarter. After successful crowdfunding, Looksery launched in October 2014. The application allows video chat with others through a special filter for faces that modifies the look of users. While there is image augmenting applications such as FaceTune and Perfect365, they are limited to static images, whereas Looksery allowed augmented reality to live videos. In late 2015, SnapChat purchased Looksery, which would then become its landmark lenses function.[28]

SnapChat's animated lenses, which used facial recognition technology, revolutionized and redefined the selfie, by allowing users to add filters to change the way they look. The selection of filters changes every day, some examples include one that makes users look like an old and wrinkled version of themselves, one that airbrushes their skin, and one that places a virtual flower crown on top of their head. The dog filter is the most popular filter that helped propel the continual success of SnapChat, with popular celebrities such as Gigi Hadid, Kim Kardashian and the likes regularly posting videos of themselves with the dog filter.

DeepFace is a deep learning facial recognition system created by a research group at Facebook. It identifies human faces in digital images. It employs a nine-layer neural net with over 120 million connection weights, and was trained on four million images uploaded by Facebook users.[29][30] The system is said to be 97% accurate, compared to 85% for the FBI's Next Generation Identification system.[31] One of the creators of the software, Yaniv Taigman, came to Facebook via their acquisition of Face.com.

ID verification

The emerging use of facial recognition is in the use of ID verification services. Many companies and others are working in the market now to provide these services to banks, ICOs, and other e-businesses.[32]

Face ID

Apple introduced Face ID on the flagship iPhone X as a biometric authentication successor to the Touch ID, a fingerprint based system. Face ID has a facial recognition sensor that consists of two parts: a "Romeo" module that projects more than 30,000 infrared dots onto the user's face, and a "Juliet" module that reads the pattern.[33] The pattern is sent to a local "Secure Enclave" in the device's central processing unit (CPU) to confirm a match with the phone owner's face.[34] The facial pattern is not accessible by Apple. The system will not work with eyes closed, in an effort to prevent unauthorized access.[34]

The technology learns from changes in a user's appearance, and therefore works with hats, scarves, glasses, and many sunglasses, beard and makeup.[35]

It also works in the dark. This is done by using a "Flood Illuminator", which is a dedicated infrared flash that throws out invisible infrared light onto the user's face to properly read the 30,000 facial points.[36]

Deployment in security services

Commonwealth

The Australian Border Force and New Zealand Customs Service have set up an automated border processing system called SmartGate that uses face recognition, which compares the face of the traveller with the data in the e-passport microchip.[37][38] All Canadian international airports use facial recognition as part of the Primary Inspection Kiosk program that compares a traveler face to their photo stored on the ePassport. This program first came to Vancouver International Airport in early 2017 and was rolled up to all remaining international airports in 2018–2019.[39] The Tocumen International Airport in Panama operates an airport-wide surveillance system using hundreds of live face recognition cameras to identify wanted individuals passing through the airport.[40]

Police forces in the United Kingdom have been trialling live facial recognition technology at public events since 2015. However, a recent report and investigation by Big Brother Watch found that these systems were up to 98% inaccurate.[41]

In May 2017, a man was arrested using an automatic facial recognition (AFR) system mounted on a van operated by the South Wales Police. Ars Technica reported that "this appears to be the first time [AFR] has led to an arrest".[42]

Live facial recognition has been trialled since 2016 in the streets of London. It will be used on a regular basis from Metropolitan Police from beginning of 2020.[43]

United States
Flight boarding gate with "biometric face scanners" developed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection at Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport.

The U.S. Department of State operates one of the largest face recognition systems in the world with a database of 117 million American adults, with photos typically drawn from driver's license photos.[44] Although it is still far from completion, it is being put to use in certain cities to give clues as to who was in the photo. The FBI uses the photos as an investigative tool, not for positive identification.[45] As of 2016, facial recognition was being used to identify people in photos taken by police in San Diego and Los Angeles (not on real-time video, and only against booking photos)[46] and use was planned in West Virginia and Dallas.[47]

In recent years Maryland has used face recognition by comparing people's faces to their driver's license photos. The system drew controversy when it was used in Baltimore to arrest unruly protesters after the death of Freddie Gray in police custody.[48] Many other states are using or developing a similar system however some states have laws prohibiting its use.

The FBI has also instituted its Next Generation Identification program to include face recognition, as well as more traditional biometrics like fingerprints and iris scans, which can pull from both criminal and civil databases.[49] The federal General Accountability Office criticized the FBI for not addressing various concerns related to privacy and accuracy.[50]

Starting in 2018, U.S. Customs and Border Protection deployed "biometric face scanners" at U.S. airports. Passengers taking outbound international flights can complete the check-in, security and the boarding process after getting facial images captured and verified by matching their ID photos stored on CBP's database. Images captured for travelers with U.S. citizenship will be deleted within up to 12-hours. TSA had expressed its intention to adopt a similar program for domestic air travel during the security check process in the future. The American Civil Liberties Union is one of the organizations against the program, concerning that the program will be used for surveillance purposes.[51]

In 2019, researchers reported that Immigration and Customs Enforcement uses facial recognition software against state driver's license databases, including for some states that provide licenses to undocumented immigrants.[50]

China
Boarding gates with facial recognition technology at Beijing West Railway Station

Lots of public places in China are implemented with facial recognition equipment, including railway stations, airports, tourist attractions, expos, and office buildings.[52]

As of late 2017, China has deployed facial recognition and artificial intelligence technology in Xinjiang. Reporters visiting the region found surveillance cameras installed every hundred meters or so in several cities, as well as facial recognition checkpoints at areas like gas stations, shopping centers, and mosque entrances.[53][54] In 2020, China provided a grant to develop facial recognition technology to identify people wearing surgical or dust masks by matching solely to eyes and foreheads.[55]

In October 2019, a professor at Zhejiang Sci-Tech University sued Hangzhou Safari Park for abusing private biometric information of customers. The Park uses facial recognition technology to verify the identities of its Year Card holders. It is viewed as the first lawsuit in regards to the facial recognition systems in China.[52][56]

On August 14, 2020 Radio Free Asia reported that in 2019, Gao Zhigang, a citizen of Taiyuan city, Shanxi Province, China, used WeChat to forward a video to Geng Guanjun, who is Gao's friend in the United States, and then Gao was convicted on the charge of the crime “picking quarrels and provoking troubles”, and sentenced to a ten-months' imprisonment. The Court documents show that China's network management and propaganda departments directly monitor WeChat users, and the Chinese police use facial recognition system to identify Geng Guanjun as an overseas democracy activist.[57]

The Netherlands

Like China, but a year earlier, The Netherlands has deployed facial recognition and artificial intelligence technology since 2016.[58] The database of the Dutch police currently contains over 2.2 million pictures of 1.3 million Dutch citizens. This accounts for about 8% of the population. Hundreds of cameras have been deployed in the city of Amsterdam alone.[59]

Automatic Facial Recognition systems resemble other mobile CCTV systems

South Africa

In South Africa, in 2016, the city of Johannesburg announced it was rolling out smart CCTV cameras complete with automatic number plate recognition and facial recognition.[60]

Additional uses

In addition to being used for security systems, authorities have found a number of other applications for face recognition systems. While earlier post-9/11 deployments were well-publicized trials, more recent deployments are rarely written about due to their covert nature.

At Super Bowl XXXV in January 2001, police in Tampa Bay, Florida used Viisage face recognition software to search for potential criminals and terrorists in attendance at the event. 19 people with minor criminal records were potentially identified.[61][62]

In the 2000 Mexican presidential election, the Mexican government employed face recognition software to prevent voter fraud. Some individuals had been registering to vote under several different names, in an attempt to place multiple votes. By comparing new face images to those already in the voter database, authorities were able to reduce duplicate registrations.[63] Similar technologies are being used in the United States to prevent people from obtaining fake identification cards and driver's licenses.[64][65]

Face recognition has been leveraged as a form of biometric authentication for various computing platforms and devices;[15] Android 4.0 "Ice Cream Sandwich" added facial recognition using a smartphone's front camera as a means of unlocking devices,[66][67] while Microsoft introduced face recognition login to its Xbox 360 video game console through its Kinect accessory,[68] as well as Windows 10 via its "Windows Hello" platform (which requires an infrared-illuminated camera).[69] Apple's iPhone X smartphone introduced facial recognition to the product line with its "Face ID" platform, which uses an infrared illumination system.[70]

Face recognition systems have also been used by photo management software to identify the subjects of photographs, enabling features such as searching images by person, as well as suggesting photos to be shared with a specific contact if their presence were detected in a photo.[71][72]

Facial recognition is used as added security in certain websites, phone applications, and payment methods.

The United States' popular music and country music celebrity Taylor Swift surreptitiously employed facial recognition technology at a concert in 2018. The camera was embedded in a kiosk near a ticket booth and scanned concert-goers as they entered the facility for known stalkers.[73]

On August 18, 2019, The Times reported that the UAE-owned Manchester City hired a Texas-based firm, Blink Identity, to deploy facial recognition systems in a driver program. The club has planned a single super-fast lane for the supporters at the Etihad stadium.[74] However, civil rights groups cautioned the club against the introduction of this technology, saying that it would risk “normalising a mass surveillance tool”. The policy and campaigns officer at Liberty, Hannah Couchman said that Man City's move is alarming, since the fans will be obliged to share deeply sensitive personal information with a private company, where they could be tracked and monitored in their everyday lives.[75]

In August 2020, Amid Corona virus, Football stadiums of New York and Los Angeles announced the instalment of facial recognition for upcoming matches. The purpose is to make the entry process as touch-less as possible. [76]

Advantages and disadvantages

Compared to other biometric systems

One key advantage of a facial recognition system that it is able to person mass identification as it does not require the cooperation of the test subject to work. Properly designed systems installed in airports, multiplexes, and other public places can identify individuals among the crowd, without passers-by even being aware of the system.[77]

However, as compared to other biometric techniques, face recognition may not be most reliable and efficient. Quality measures are very important in facial recognition systems as large degrees of variations are possible in face images. Factors such as illumination, expression, pose and noise during face capture can affect the performance of facial recognition systems.[77] Among all biometric systems, facial recognition has the highest false acceptance and rejection rates,[77] thus questions have been raised on the effectiveness of face recognition software in cases of railway and airport security.

Weaknesses

Ralph Gross, a researcher at the Carnegie Mellon Robotics Institute in 2008, describes one obstacle related to the viewing angle of the face: "Face recognition has been getting pretty good at full frontal faces and 20 degrees off, but as soon as you go towards profile, there've been problems."[10] Besides the pose variations, low-resolution face images are also very hard to recognize. This is one of the main obstacles of face recognition in surveillance systems.[78]

Face recognition is less effective if facial expressions vary. A big smile can render the system less effective. For instance: Canada, in 2009, allowed only neutral facial expressions in passport photos.[79]

There is also inconstancy in the datasets used by researchers. Researchers may use anywhere from several subjects to scores of subjects and a few hundred images to thousands of images. It is important for researchers to make available the datasets they used to each other, or have at least a standard dataset.[80]

Data privacy is the main concern when it comes to storing biometrics data in companies. Data stores about face or biometrics can be accessed by the third party if not stored properly or hacked. In the Techworld, Parris adds (2017), “Hackers will already be looking to replicate people's faces to trick facial recognition systems, but the technology has proved harder to hack than fingerprint or voice recognition technology in the past.”

Ineffectiveness

Critics of the technology complain that the London Borough of Newham scheme has, as of 2004, never recognized a single criminal, despite several criminals in the system's database living in the Borough and the system has been running for several years. "Not once, as far as the police know, has Newham's automatic face recognition system spotted a live target."[62][81] This information seems to conflict with claims that the system was credited with a 34% reduction in crime (hence why it was rolled out to Birmingham also).[82] However it can be explained by the notion that when the public is regularly told that they are under constant video surveillance with advanced face recognition technology, this fear alone can reduce the crime rate, whether the face recognition system technically works or does not. This has been the basis for several other face recognition based security systems, where the technology itself does not work particularly well but the user's perception of the technology does.

An experiment in 2002 by the local police department in Tampa, Florida, had similarly disappointing results.[62]

A system at Boston's Logan Airport was shut down in 2003 after failing to make any matches during a two-year test period.[83]

In 2014, Facebook stated that in a standardized two-option facial recognition test, its online system scored 97.25% accuracy, compared to the human benchmark of 97.5%.[84]

In 2018, a report by the civil liberties and rights campaigning organisation Big Brother Watch revealed that two UK police forces, South Wales Police and the Metropolitan Police, were using live facial recognition at public events and in public spaces, in September 2019, South Wales Police use of facial recognition was ruled lawful.[85]

Systems are often advertised as having accuracy near 100%; this is misleading as the studies often use much smaller sample sizes than would be necessary for large scale applications. Because facial recognition is not completely accurate, it creates a list of potential matches. A human operator must then look through these potential matches and studies show the operators pick the correct match out of the list only about half the time. This causes the issue of targeting the wrong suspect.[45][86]

Controversies

Privacy violations

Civil rights organizations and privacy campaigners such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation,[87] Big Brother Watch[41] and the ACLU[88] express concern that privacy is being compromised by the use of surveillance technologies. Some fear that it could lead to a “total surveillance society,” with the government and other authorities having the ability to know the whereabouts and activities of all citizens around the clock. This knowledge has been, is being, and could continue to be deployed to prevent the lawful exercise of rights of citizens to criticize those in office, specific government policies or corporate practices. Many centralized power structures with such surveillance capabilities have abused their privileged access to maintain control of the political and economic apparatus, and to curtail populist reforms.[89]

Face recognition can be used not just to identify an individual, but also to unearth other personal data associated with an individual – such as other photos featuring the individual, blog posts, social networking profiles, Internet behavior, travel patterns, etc. – all through facial features alone.[90] Concerns have been raised over who would have access to the knowledge of one's whereabouts and people with them at any given time.[91] Moreover, individuals have limited ability to avoid or thwart face recognition tracking unless they hide their faces. This fundamentally changes the dynamic of day-to-day privacy by enabling any marketer, government agency, or random stranger to secretly collect the identities and associated personal information of any individual captured by the face recognition system.[90] Consumers may not understand or be aware of what their data is being used for, which denies them the ability to consent to how their personal information gets shared.[91]

Face recognition was used in Russia to harass women allegedly involved in online pornography.[92] In Russia there is an app 'FindFace' which can identify faces with about 70% accuracy using the social media app called VK. This app would not be possible in other countries which do not use VK as their social media platform photos are not stored the same way as with VK.[93]

In July 2012, a hearing was held before the Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, to address issues surrounding what face recognition technology means for privacy and civil liberties.[94]

In 2014, the National Telecommunications and Information Association (NTIA) began a multi-stakeholder process to engage privacy advocates and industry representatives to establish guidelines regarding the use of face recognition technology by private companies.[95] In June 2015, privacy advocates left the bargaining table over what they felt was an impasse based on the industry representatives being unwilling to agree to consent requirements for the collection of face recognition data.[96] The NTIA and industry representatives continued without the privacy representatives, and draft rules are expected to be presented in the spring of 2016.[97]

In July 2015, the United States Government Accountability Office conducted a Report to the Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate. The report discussed facial recognition technology's commercial uses, privacy issues, and the applicable federal law. It states that previously, issues concerning facial recognition technology were discussed and represent the need for updated federal privacy laws that continually match the degree and impact of advanced technologies. Also, some industry, government, and private organizations are in the process of developing, or have developed, "voluntary privacy guidelines". These guidelines vary between the groups, but overall aim to gain consent and inform citizens of the intended use of facial recognition technology. This helps counteract the privacy issues that arise when citizens are unaware of where their personal, privacy data gets put to use as the report indicates as a prevalent issue.[91]

The largest concern with the development of biometric technology, and more specifically facial recognition has to do with privacy. The rise in facial recognition technologies has led people to be concerned that large companies, such as Google or Apple, or even Government agencies will be using it for mass surveillance of the public. Regardless of whether or not they have committed a crime, in general people do not wish to have their every action watched or track. People tend to believe that, since we live in a free society, we should be able to go out in public without the fear of being identified and surveilled. People worry that with the rising prevalence of facial recognition, they will begin to lose their anonymity.

On August 11, 2020, a UK court ruled that facial recognition technology violates human rights. The ruling does not suspend the use of all facial recognition technology, but rather, states that better parameters need to be put in place as to when it can be used.[98]

Facebook DeepFace

Social media web sites such as Facebook have very large numbers of photographs of people, annotated with names. This represents a database which may be abused by governments for face recognition purposes.[99] Facebook's DeepFace has become the subject of several class action lawsuits under the Biometric Information Privacy Act, with claims alleging that Facebook is collecting and storing face recognition data of its users without obtaining informed consent, in direct violation of the Biometric Information Privacy Act.[100] The most recent case was dismissed in January 2016 because the court lacked jurisdiction.[101] Therefore, it is still unclear if the Biometric Information Privacy Act will be effective in protecting biometric data privacy rights.

In December 2017, Facebook rolled out a new feature that notifies a user when someone uploads a photo that includes what Facebook thinks is their face, even if they are not tagged. Facebook has attempted to frame the new functionality in a positive light, amidst prior backlashes.[102] Facebook's head of privacy, Rob Sherman, addressed this new feature as one that gives people more control over their photos online. “We’ve thought about this as a really empowering feature,” he says. “There may be photos that exist that you don’t know about.” [103]

Imperfect technology in law enforcement

All over the world, law enforcement agencies have begun using facial recognition software to aid in the identifying of criminals. For example, the Chinese police force were able to identify twenty-five wanted suspects using facial recognition equipment at the Qingdao International Beer Festival, one of which had been on the run for 10 years.[104] The equipment works by recording a 15-second video clip and taking multiple snapshots of the subject. That data is compared and analyzed with images from the police department's database and within 20 minutes, the subject can be identified with a 98.1% accuracy.[105]

It is still contested as to whether or not facial recognition technology works less accurately on people of color.[106] One study by Joy Buolamwini (MIT Media Lab) and Timnit Gebru (Microsoft Research) found that the error rate for gender recognition for women of color within three commercial facial recognition systems ranged from 23.8% to 36%, whereas for lighter-skinned men it was between 0.0 and 1.6%. Overall accuracy rates for identifying men (91.9%) were higher than for women (79.4%), and none of the systems accommodated a non-binary understanding of gender.[107] However, another study showed that several commercial facial recognition software sold to law enforcement offices around the country had a lower false non-match rate for black people than for white people.[108]

Experts fear that the new technology may actually be hurting the communities the police claims they are trying to protect.[109] It is considered an imperfect biometric, and in a study conducted by Georgetown University researcher Clare Garvie, she concluded that "there’s no consensus in the scientific community that it provides a positive identification of somebody.”[110]

It is believed that with such large margins of error in this technology, both legal advocates and facial recognition software companies say that the technology should only supply a portion of the case – no evidence that can lead to an arrest of an individual.[110]

The lack of regulations holding facial recognition technology companies to requirements of racially biased testing can be a significant flaw in the adoption of use in law enforcement. CyberExtruder, a company that markets itself to law enforcement said that they had not performed testing or research on bias in their software. CyberExtruder did note that some skin colors are more difficult for the software to recognize with current limitations of the technology. “Just as individuals with very dark skin are hard to identify with high significance via facial recognition, individuals with very pale skin are the same,” said Blake Senftner, a senior software engineer at CyberExtruder.[110]

In 2018, the Scottish government created a code of practice which dealt with privacy issues and won praise of the Open Rights Group.[111][112]

UK Information Commissioner's King's Cross investigation

In 2019 the Financial Times first reported that facial recognition software was in use in the King's Cross area of London.[113] The development around London's King's Cross mainline station includes shops, offices, Google's UK HQ and part of St Martin's College. The BBC reported, the ICO said: "Scanning people's faces as they lawfully go about their daily lives, in order to identify them, is a potential threat to privacy that should concern us all."[114][115] Elizabeth Denham, the UK Information Commissioner launched an investigation into the use of the King's Cross facial recognition system, operated by the company Argent. "This is inherently a surveillance tool that bends towards authoritarianism," said Silkie Carlo of Big Brother Watch. In September 2019 it was announced by Argent that facial recognition software would no longer be used at King's Cross. Argent claimed that the software had been deployed between May 2016 and March 2018 on two cameras covering a pedestrian street running through the centre of the development. The Guardian reported that the decision to switch off the facial recognition system was a result of public concern about its deployment.[116] Facial recognition software has also been used at Meadowhall shopping centre in Sheffield, the World Museum in Liverpool and Millennium Point complex in Birmingham.[117]

Sweden 2019 GDPR Violation

The Swedish Data Protection Authority (DPA) issued its first ever financial penalty for a violation of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) against a school that was using the technology to replace time-consuming roll calls during class. The DPA found that the school illegally obtained the biometric data of its students without completing an impact assessment. In addition the school did not make the DPA aware of the pilot scheme. A 200,000 SEK fine (€19,000/$21,000) was issued.[118]

Bans

In May 2019, San Francisco, California became the first major United States city to ban the use of facial recognition software for police and other local government agencies' usage.[119] San Francisco Supervisor, Aaron Peskin, introduced regulations that will require agencies to gain approval from the San Francisco Board of Supervisors to purchase surveillance technology.[120] The regulations also require that agencies publicly disclose the intended use for new surveillance technology.[120] In June 2019, Somerville, Massachusetts became the first city on the East Coast to ban face surveillance software for government use,[121] specifically in police investigations and municipal surveillance.[122] In July 2019, Oakland, California banned the usage of facial recognition technology by city departments.[123]

The American Civil Liberties Union ("ACLU") has campaigned across the United States for transparency in surveillance technology[122] and has supported both San Francisco and Somerville's ban on facial recognition software. The ACLU works to challenge the secrecy and surveillance with this technology.

In January 2020, the European Union suggested, but then quickly scrapped, a proposed moratorium on facial recognition in public spaces.[124][125]

During the George Floyd protests, use of facial recognition by city government was banned in Boston, Massachusetts.[126]

As of June 10, 2020, municipal use has been banned in:[127]

Distinction between facial recognition and facial analysis
Further information: Physiognomy

Facial recognition has to be distinguished from facial (image) analysis.[129] Facial recognition matches a given photo to one observed in the past, and then to a unique identifier for the person depicted in the photo, subsequently retrieving known information about the individual. Facial analysis predicts individual data using statistical inference from the facial image itself and can be performed even on individuals one sees for the first time. Facial analysis is effectively a rebranding of historically notorious physiognomy.[130]

Emotion detection

Facial recognition systems have been used for emotion recognition[131][132] In 2016 Facebook acquired emotion detection startup FacioMetrics.[133][134]

Anti-facial recognition systems

In January 2013 Japanese researchers from the National Institute of Informatics created 'privacy visor' glasses that use nearly infrared light to make the face underneath it unrecognizable to face recognition software.[135] The latest version uses a titanium frame, light-reflective material and a mask which uses angles and patterns to disrupt facial recognition technology through both absorbing and bouncing back light sources.[136][137][138][139] Some projects use adversarial machine learning to come up with new printed patterns that confuse existing face recognition software.[140]

Another method to protect from facial recognition systems are specific haircuts and make-up patterns that prevent the used algorithms to detect a face, known as computer vision dazzle.[141] Incidentally, the makeup styles popular with Juggalos can also protect against facial recognition.[142]

gollark: Websockets aren't evil...
gollark: You can contact Wojbie more easily by sending krist transactions to yourself.
gollark: 🥓≋🥔
gollark: If the transaction is for buying meat or something, perhaps?
gollark: ≋≋ <- a healthy snack for all the family.

See also
Lists

References
  1. "What is Facial Recognition? - Definition from Techopedia". Techopedia.com. Retrieved 2018-08-27.
  2. Andrew Heinzman. "How Does Facial Recognition Work?". How-To Geek. Retrieved 2020-02-28.
  3. "How does facial recognition work?". us.norton.com. Retrieved 2020-02-28.
  4. "Face Recognition Applications". Animetrics. Archived from the original on 2008-07-13. Retrieved 2008-06-04.
  5. Zhang, Jian, Yan, Ke, He, Zhen-Yu, and Xu, Yong (2014). "A Collaborative Linear Discriminative Representation Classification Method for Face Recognition. In 2014 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Software Engineering (AISE2014). Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications, Inc. p.21 ISBN 9781605951508
  6. "Facial Recognition: Who's Tracking You in Public?". Consumer Reports. Retrieved 2016-04-05.
  7. Bramer, Max (2006). Artificial Intelligence in Theory and Practice: IFIP 19th World Computer Congress, TC 12: IFIP AI 2006 Stream, August 21-24, 2006, Santiago, Chile. Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media. p. 395. ISBN 9780387346540.
  8. de Leeuw, Karl; Bergstra, Jan (2007). The History of Information Security: A Comprehensive Handbook. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 264–265. ISBN 9780444516084.
  9. "Mugspot Can Find A Face In The Crowd -- Face-Recognition Software Prepares To Go To Work In The Streets". ScienceDaily. 12 November 1997. Retrieved 2007-11-06.
  10. Williams, Mark. "Better Face-Recognition Software". Retrieved 2008-06-02.
  11. R. Kimmel and G. Sapiro (30 April 2003). "The Mathematics of Face Recognition". SIAM News. Archived from the original on 15 July 2007. Retrieved 2003-04-30.
  12. "Face Homepage". nist.gov. 2011-01-21.
  13. Crawford, Mark. "Facial recognition progress report". SPIE Newsroom. Retrieved 2011-10-06.
  14. "Airport Facial Recognition Passenger Flow Management". hrsid.com.
  15. Bonsor, K. (2001-09-04). "How Facial Recognition Systems Work". Retrieved 2008-06-02.
  16. Smith, Kelly. "Face Recognition" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-06-04.
  17. R. Brunelli and T. Poggio, "Face Recognition: Features versus Templates", IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 1993, (15)10:1042-1052
  18. R. Brunelli, Template Matching Techniques in Computer Vision: Theory and Practice, Wiley, ISBN 978-0-470-51706-2, 2009 ( TM book)
  19. Zhang, David; Jain, Anil (2006). Advances in Biometrics: International Conference, ICB 2006, Hong Kong, China, January 5-7, 2006, Proceedings. Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media. p. 183. ISBN 9783540311119.
  20. Kimmel, Ron. "Three-dimensional face recognition" (PDF). Retrieved 2005-01-01.
  21. Duhn, S. von; Ko, M. J.; Yin, L.; Hung, T.; Wei, X. (1 September 2007). "Three-View Surveillance Video Based Face Modeling for Recogniton". Three-View Surveillance Video Based Face Modeling for Recognition. pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/BCC.2007.4430529. ISBN 978-1-4244-1548-9.
  22. "How Facial Recognition Systems Work". HowStuffWorks. 2001-09-04. Retrieved 2018-04-09.
  23. Socolinsky, Diego A.; Selinger, Andrea (1 January 2004). "Thermal Face Recognition in an Operational Scenario". IEEE Computer Society. pp. 1012–1019 – via ACM Digital Library.
  24. "Army Builds Face Recognition Technology that Works in Low-Light Conditions". AZoRobotics. April 18, 2018. Retrieved August 17, 2018.
  25. "Army develops face recognition technology that works in the dark". Army Research Laboratory. April 16, 2018. Retrieved August 17, 2018.
  26. Riggan, Benjamin; Short, Nathaniel; Hu, Shuowen (March 2018). "Thermal to Visible Synthesis of Face Images using Multiple Regions". ResearchGate. arXiv:1803.07599. Bibcode:2018arXiv180307599R.
  27. Cole, Sally (June 2018). "U.S. Army's AI facial recognition works in the dark". Military Embedded Systems. p. 8.
  28. Shontell, Alyson (2015-09-15). "Snapchat buys Looksery, a 2-year-old startup that lets you Photoshop your face while you video chat". Business Insider Singapore. Retrieved 2018-04-09.
  29. Simonite, Tom. "Facebook Creates Software That Matches Faces Almost as Well as You Do". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 2018-04-09.
  30. "Facebook's DeepFace shows serious facial recognition skills". Retrieved 2018-04-09.
  31. "Why Facebook is beating the FBI at facial recognition". The Verge. Retrieved 2018-04-09.
  32. "A glimpse at bank branches of the future: video walls, booth-sized locations and 24/7 access". USA TODAY. Retrieved 2018-08-13.
  33. Kubota, Yoko (2017-09-27). "Apple iPhone X Production Woe Sparked by Juliet and Her Romeo". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  34. "The five biggest questions about Apple's new facial recognition system". The Verge. Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  35. "Apple's Face ID Feature Works With Most Sunglasses, Can Be Quickly Disabled to Thwart Thieves". Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  36. Heisler, Yoni (2017-11-03). "Infrared video shows off the iPhone X's new Face ID feature in action". BGR. Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  37. "Smartgates Face editing for the mins of the can we have". Australian Border Force. Retrieved 11 March 2019.
  38. "Our history". New Zealand Customs Service. Retrieved 11 March 2019.
  39. "Facial recognition technology is coming to Canadian airports this spring". CBC News. Retrieved 2017-03-03.
  40. Vogel, Ben. "Panama puts names to more faces". IHS Jane's Airport Review. Archived from the original on 12 October 2014. Retrieved 2014-10-07. Under the USD11 million contract, a cluster of sixty computers, a fibre optic network, and 150 surveillance cameras were installed in the terminal and at about 30 gates.
  41. "Face Off: The lawless growth of facial recognition in UK policing" (PDF). Big Brother Watch.
  42. Anthony, Sebastian (6 June 2017). "UK police arrest man via automatic face-recognition tech". Ars Technica.
  43. Burgess, Matt (2020-01-24). "The Met Police will start using live facial recognition across London". Wired UK. ISSN 1357-0978. Retrieved 2020-01-24.
  44. FORTUNE. "Here's How Many Adult Faces Are Scanned From Facial Recognition Databases".
  45. "The trouble with facial recognition technology (in the real world)".
  46. "Real-Time Facial Recognition Is Available, But Will U.S. Police Buy It?". NPR.org.
  47. "Police Facial Recognition Databases Log About Half Of Americans". NPR.org.
  48. Knezevich, Kevin Rector, Alison. "Maryland's use of facial recognition software questioned by researchers, civil liberties advocates".
  49. "Next Generation Identification". FBI. Retrieved 2016-04-05.
  50. ICE Uses Facial Recognition To Sift State Driver's License Records, Researchers Say
  51. "TSA had expressed its intention to adopt a similar program for domestic air travel". USA Today. 2019-08-16.
  52. "A lawsuit against face-scans in China could have big consequences". The Economist. 2019-11-09.
  53. "China's massive investment in artificial intelligence has an insidious downside". Science | AAAS. 7 February 2018. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
  54. "China bets on facial recognition in big drive for total surveillance". Washington Post. 2018. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
  55. Shwayder, Maya (2020-02-11). "Chinese firm working on facial recognition that can identify you under a mask". www.digitaltrends.com. Retrieved 2020-02-11.
  56. "中国人脸识别第一案 杭州一动物园被起诉". 北京青年报. 新华网. 2019-11-04.
  57. Xiaoshan, Huang; Wen, Cheng. "New evidence showing Tencent monitors overseas users". Archived from the original on 15 August 2020. Retrieved 15 August 2020.
  58. Techredacteur, Joost Schellevis. "Politie gaat verdachten opsporen met gezichtsherkenning". nos.nl (in Dutch). Retrieved 2019-09-22.
  59. Boon, Lex (2018-08-25). "Meekijken met de 226 gemeentecamera's". Het Parool (in Dutch). Retrieved 2019-09-22.
  60. How CCTV surveillance poses a threat to privacy in South Africa
  61. Greene, Lisa (15 February 2001). "Face scans match few suspects" (SHTML). St. Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on 30 November 2014. Retrieved 2011-06-30. By using Viisage software, police matched 19 people's faces to photos of people arrested in the past for minor pickpocketing, fraud and other charges. They weren't charged with any game-day misdeeds. THIS IS A FARCE
  62. Krause, Mike (14 January 2002). "Is face recognition just high-tech snake oil?". Enter Stage Right. ISSN 1488-1756. Archived from the original on 24 January 2002. Retrieved 2011-06-30.
  63. "Mexican Government Adopts FaceIt Face Recognition Technology to Eliminate Duplicate Voter Registrations in Upcoming Presidential Election". Business Wire. 11 May 2000. Retrieved 2008-06-02.
  64. House, David. "Facial recognition at DMV". Oregon Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on 5 February 2007. Retrieved 2007-09-17. Oregon DMV is going to start using “facial recognition” software, a new tool in the prevention of fraud, required by a new state law. The law is designed to prevent someone from obtaining a driver license or ID card under a false name.
  65. Schultz, Zac. "Facial Recognition Technology Helps DMV Prevent Identity Theft". WMTV News, Gray Television. Archived from the original on 2012-09-04. Retrieved 2007-09-17. Madison: ...The Department of Motor Vehicles is using... facial recognition technology [to prevent ID theft]
  66. Heater, Brian. "Don't rely on Face Unlock to keep your phone secure". TechCrunch. Retrieved 2017-11-02.
  67. "Galaxy S8 face recognition already defeated with a simple picture". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2017-11-02.
  68. "How Facial Recognition Works in Xbox Kinect". Wired. Retrieved 2017-11-02.
  69. "Windows 10 says "Hello" to logging in with your face and the end of passwords". Ars Technica. 2015-03-17. Retrieved 17 March 2015.
  70. Kubota, Yoko (September 27, 2017). "Apple iPhone X Production Woe Sparked by Juliet and Her Romeo". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on September 28, 2017. Retrieved September 27, 2017.
  71. "Windows 10's Photos app is getting smarter image search just like Google Photos". The Verge. Retrieved 2017-11-02.
  72. Perez, Sarah. "Google Photos upgraded with new sharing features, photo books, and Google Lens". TechCrunch. Retrieved 2017-11-02.
  73. Giaritelli, Anna (December 13, 2018). "Taylor Swift used airport-style facial recognition on concertgoers". www.washingtonexaminer.com. Retrieved December 13, 2018.
  74. "Manchester City tries facial recognition to beat football queues". The Times. Retrieved 18 August 2019.
  75. "Manchester City warned against using facial recognition on fans". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 August 2019.
  76. Olson, Parmy (2020-08-01). "Facial Recognition's Next Big Play: the Sports Stadium". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2020-08-03.
  77. "Top Five Biometrics: Face, Fingerprint, Iris, Palm and Voice". Bayometric. 2017-01-23. Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  78. Haghighat, Mohammad; Abdel-Mottaleb, Mohamed (2017). "Low Resolution Face Recognition in Surveillance Systems Using Discriminant Correlation Analysis". 2017 12th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2017). pp. 912–917. doi:10.1109/FG.2017.130. ISBN 978-1-5090-4023-0.
  79. "Passport Canada - Photos". passportcanada.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 1 March 2009.
  80. Albiol, A., Albiol, A., Oliver, J., Mossi, J.M.(2012). Who is who at different cameras: people re-identification using depth cameras. Computer Vision, IET. Vol 6(5), 378-387.
  81. Meek, James (13 June 2002). "Robo cop". London: UK Guardian newspaper.
  82. "Birmingham City Centre CCTV Installs Visionics' FaceIt". Business Wire. 2 June 2008.
  83. Willing, Richard (2 September 2003). "Airport anti-terror systems flub tests; Face-recognition technology fails to flag 'suspects'" (Abstract). USA Today. Retrieved 2007-09-17.
  84. Meyer, Robinson (2015). "How Worried Should We Be About Facial Recognition?". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
  85. Rees, Jenny (2019-09-04). "Police use of facial recognition ruled lawful". Retrieved 2019-11-08.
  86. White, David; Dunn, James D.; Schmid, Alexandra C.; Kemp, Richard I. (14 October 2015). "Error Rates in Users of Automatic Face Recognition Software". PLOS ONE. 10 (10): e0139827. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1039827W. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139827. PMC 4605725. PMID 26465631.
  87. "EFF Sues FBI For Access to Facial-Recognition Records". Electronic Frontier Foundation. 2013-06-26.
  88. "Q&A On Face-Recognition". American Civil Liberties Union.
  89. "Civil Liberties & Facial Recognition Software". About.com, The New York Times Company. p. 2. Archived from the original on 1 March 2006. Retrieved 2007-09-17. A few examples which have already arisen from surveillance video are: using license plates to blackmail gay married people, stalking women, tracking estranged spouses...
  90. Harley Geiger (6 December 2011). "Facial Recognition and Privacy". Center for Democracy & Technology. Retrieved 2012-01-10.
  91. Cackley, Alicia Puente (July 2015). "FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY Commercial Uses, Privacy Issues, and Applicable Federal Law" (PDF).
  92. "Facial Recognition is getting really accurate, and we have not prepared". 11 October 2016.
  93. "This creepy facial recognition app is taking Russia by storm". 18 May 2016.
  94. What Facial Recognition Technology Means for Privacy and Civil Liberties: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Second Session, July 18, 2012
  95. "Privacy Multistakeholder Process: Facial Recognition Technology". National Telecommunications and Information Association. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  96. McCabe, David (2015-06-16). "Facial recognition talks break down as privacy advocates withdraw". TheHill. Retrieved 2016-04-05.
  97. Weaver, Dustin (2016-03-18). "Business eyes facial recognition guidelines". TheHill. Retrieved 2016-04-05.
  98. "Facial Recognition Violates Human Rights, Court Rules". Forbes. Retrieved 13 August 2020.
  99. Martin Koste (28 October 2013). "A Look Into Facebook's Potential To Recognize Anybody's Face". NPR. Archived from the original on 1 November 2013. Retrieved 2013-12-25.
  100. "Facebook Keeps Getting Sued Over Face-Recognition Software, And Privacy Groups Say We Should Be Paying More Attention". International Business Times. 2015-09-03. Retrieved 2016-04-05.
  101. Herra, Dana. "Judge tosses Illinois privacy law class action vs Facebook over photo tagging; California cases still pending". cookcountyrecord.com. Retrieved 2016-04-05.
  102. "Singel-Minded: Anatomy of a Backlash, or How Facebook Got an 'F' for Facial Recognition". WIRED. Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  103. "Facebook Can Now Find Your Face, Even When It's Not Tagged". WIRED. Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  104. Beijing, Agence France-Presse in (2017-09-01). "From ale to jail: facial recognition catches criminals at China beer festival". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-03-08.
  105. "Police use facial recognition technology to detect wanted criminals during beer festival in Chinese city of Qingdao | OpenGovAsia". www.opengovasia.com. Archived from the original on 2017-11-16. Retrieved 2018-03-08.
  106. "Photo Algorithms ID White Men Fine—Black Women, Not So Much". WIRED. Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  107. Joy Buolamwini; Timnit Gebru (2018). "Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification". Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 81: 77–91. Retrieved 8 March 2018. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: location (link)
  108. Grother, Patrick; Quinn, George; Phillips, P. Jonathon (August 24, 2011). "Report on the Evaluation of 2D Still-Image Face Recognition Algorithms" (PDF). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  109. Buranyi, Stephen (2017-08-08). "Rise of the racist robots – how AI is learning all our worst impulses". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  110. Brel, Ali (2017-12-04). "How white engineers built racist code – and why it's dangerous for black people". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  111. Scottish government proposes immediate deletion of expired facial images in new biometrics code
  112. CODE OF PRACTICE On the acquisition, use, retention and disposal of biometric data for justiceand community safetypurposes in Scotland
  113. Murgia, Madhumita (2019-08-12). "London's King's Cross uses facial recognition in security cameras". Financial Times (subscription site). Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  114. "King's Cross facial recognition investigated". BBC News. 15 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  115. Cellan-Jones, Rory (16 August 2019). "Tech Tent: Is your face on a watch list?". BBC News. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  116. Sabbagh, Dan (2 September 2019). "Facial recognition technology scrapped at King's Cross site". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2 September 2019.
  117. "Facial recognition test run on unwitting shoppers". BBC News. 16 August 2019. Retrieved 17 August 2019.
  118. News, GDPR (2019-09-01). "Unlawful Use of Facial Recognition Technology Lead to GDPR Penalty in Sweden". Compliance Junction. Retrieved 2019-09-20.
  119. Conger, Kate; Fausset, Richard; Kovaleski, Serge F. (2019-05-14). "San Francisco Bans Facial Recognition Technology". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-03-26.
  120. "San Francisco Bans Agency Use of Facial Recognition Tech". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2020-03-26.
  121. "Somerville Bans Government Use Of Facial Recognition Tech". www.wbur.org. Retrieved 2020-03-26.
  122. "Somerville City Council passes facial recognition ban - The Boston Globe". BostonGlobe.com. Retrieved 2020-03-26.
  123. Haskins, Caroline (2019-07-17). "Oakland Becomes Third U.S. City to Ban Facial Recognition". Vice. Retrieved 2020-04-11.
  124. "EU drops idea of facial recognition ban in public areas: paper". Reuters. 29 January 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  125. "Facial recognition: EU considers ban". BBC News. 17 January 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  126. Boston mayor OKs ban on facial recognition tech
  127. IBM bows out of facial recognition market
  128. Boston mayor OKs ban on facial recognition tech
  129. "Note to Press: Facial Analysis Is Not Facial Recognition". Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. 27 January 2019. Retrieved 29 June 2020.
  130. Tkachenko, Yegor; Jedidi, Kamel (1 June 2020). "What personal information can a consumer facial image reveal? Implications for marketing ROI and consumer privacy". SSRN. SSRN 3616470. Retrieved 17 June 2020.
  131. "Emotion detector: Facial expression recognition to improve learning, gaming". Science Daily. Retrieved 4 January 2017.
  132. "Facial Recognition Market - Global Forecast to 2021". Digital Journal. Retrieved 4 January 2017.
  133. Constine, Josh. "Like by smiling? Facebook acquires emotion detection startup FacioMetrics". TechCrunch. Retrieved 4 January 2017.
  134. "Facebook acquires FacioMetrics to add 'fun effects' to photos and videos". VentureBeat. Retrieved 4 January 2017.
  135. "These Goofy-Looking Glasses Could Make You Invisible to Facial Recognition Technology". Slate. 18 January 2013. Retrieved 22 January 2013.
  136. Hongo, Jun. "Eyeglasses with Face Un-Recognition Function to Debut in Japan". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  137. Osborne, Charlie. "Privacy visor which blocks facial recognition software set for public release". ZDNet. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  138. Stone, Maddie. "These Glasses Block Facial Recognition Technology". Gizmodo. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  139. "How Japan's Privacy Visor fools face-recognition cameras". PCWorld. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
  140. Cox, Kate (10 April 2020). "Some shirts hide you from cameras—but will anyone wear them?". Ars Technica. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  141. Harvey, Adam. "CV Dazzle: Camouflage from Face Detection". cvdazzle.com. Retrieved 2017-09-15.
  142. Schreiber, Hope. "Worried about facial recognition technology? Juggalo makeup prevents involuntary surveillance". Retrieved 2019-07-18.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.