Crisis of the Sixteenth Century
The Crisis of the Sixteenth Century was the later part of the Transitional period of Sri Lanka, that began with the decline of the Kingdom of Kotte, with the Vijayabā Kollaya in 1521, culminated in the collapse of the Kingdom of Sitawaka, and with Portuguese dominance, if not control by 1597, over two of three kingdoms that had existed at the start of the century.[1] The Kingdom of Kandy was the only independent Sinhalese kingdom to survive.[2] The period was characterised by the fragmentation of the Sinhalese polity, intervention of foreign forces and constant military conflict.
Part of a series on the |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
History of Sri Lanka | ||||||||||||||||
Chronicles | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Periods | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
By Topic | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Overview
Periodization of Sri Lanka history:
Dates | Period | Period | Span (years) | Subperiod | Span (years) | Main government |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
300,000 BP–~1000 BC | Prehistoric Sri Lanka | Stone Age | – | 300,000 | Unknown | |
Bronze Age | – | |||||
~1000 BC–543 BC | Iron Age | – | 457 | |||
543 BC–437 BC | Ancient Sri Lanka | Pre Anuradhapura | – | 106 | Monarchy | |
437 BC–463 AD | Anuradhapura | 1454 | Early Anuradhapura | 900 | ||
463–691 | Middle Anuradhapura | 228 | ||||
691–1017 | Post-classical "Medieval" Sri Lanka |
Late Anuradhapura | 326 | |||
1017–1070 | Polonnaruwa | 215 | Chola conquest | 53 | ||
1055–1232 | 177 | |||||
1232–1521 | Transitional | 365 | 289 | |||
1521–1597 | Early Modern Sri Lanka | Crisis of the Sixteenth Century | 76 | |||
1597–1815 | Kandyan | – | 218 | |||
1815–1948 | Modern Sri Lanka | British Ceylon | – | 133 | Colonial Government | |
1948–1972 | Contemporary Sri Lanka | Sri Lanka since 1948 | 72 years ago | Dominion | 24 | Constitutional monarchy |
1972–Present | Republic | 48 years ago | Unitary semi-presidential constitutional republic |
Political history
Vijayabā Kollaya
Wars of Kotte Succession
Sinhalese–Portuguese War
Portuguese conquest of the Jaffna kingdom
gollark: No, Richard, it's 'Linux', not 'GNU/Linux'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to Linux were the creation of the GPL and the GCC compiler. Those are fine and inspired products. GCC is a monumental achievement and has earned you, RMS, and the Free Software Foundation countless kudos and much appreciation.Following are some reasons for you to mull over, including some already answered in your FAQ.One guy, Linus Torvalds, used GCC to make his operating system (yes, Linux is an OS -- more on this later). He named it 'Linux' with a little help from his friends. Why doesn't he call it GNU/Linux? Because he wrote it, with more help from his friends, not you. You named your stuff, I named my stuff -- including the software I wrote using GCC -- and Linus named his stuff. The proper name is Linux because Linus Torvalds says so. Linus has spoken. Accept his authority. To do otherwise is to become a nag. You don't want to be known as a nag, do you?(An operating system) != (a distribution). Linux is an operating system. By my definition, an operating system is that software which provides and limits access to hardware resources on a computer. That definition applies whereever you see Linux in use. However, Linux is usually distributed with a collection of utilities and applications to make it easily configurable as a desktop system, a server, a development box, or a graphics workstation, or whatever the user needs. In such a configuration, we have a Linux (based) distribution. Therein lies your strongest argument for the unwieldy title 'GNU/Linux' (when said bundled software is largely from the FSF). Go bug the distribution makers on that one. Take your beef to Red Hat, Mandrake, and Slackware. At least there you have an argument. Linux alone is an operating system that can be used in various applications without any GNU software whatsoever. Embedded applications come to mind as an obvious example.
gollark: Oh, wait, better idea.
gollark: Hey, I *said* (GNU[+/])Linux, isn't that good enough for you, Stallman?!
gollark: Yep!
gollark: Also, though this is more personal preference, (GNU[+/])Linux (distributions) has (have):- a package manager useful for general use (the windows store is not really this)- a usable shell (yes, I'm aware you can use WSL, but it's not very integrated with everything else)- lower resource use- a nicer UI (well, the option for one; AFAIK Windows does not allow as much customization)
See also
- Crisis of the Third Century – a similar period in Roman history
- Sengoku period – a similar period in Japanese history
- Warring States period – a similar period in Chinese history
References
Citations
- De Silva 2014, p. 161.
- De Silva 2014, p. 162.
Bibliography
- De Silva, K. M. (2014). A history of Sri Lanka ([Revised.] ed.). Colombo: Vijitha Yapa Publications. ISBN 978-955-8095-92-8.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.