Environmental impact of concrete

The environmental impact of concrete, its manufacture and applications, are complex. Some effects are harmful; others welcome. Many depend on circumstances. A major component of concrete is cement, which has its own environmental and social impacts and contributes largely to those of concrete.

The cement industry is one of the main producers of carbon dioxide, a potent greenhouse gas.[1] Concrete causes damage to the most fertile layer of the earth, the topsoil. Concrete is used to create hard surfaces which contribute to surface runoff that may cause soil erosion, water pollution and flooding. Conversely, concrete is one of the most powerful tools for proper flood control, by means of damming, diversion, and deflection of flood waters, mud flows, and the like. Light-colored concrete can reduce the urban heat island effect, due to its higher albedo.[2] However, original vegetation results in even greater benefit. Concrete dust released by building demolition and natural disasters can be a major source of dangerous air pollution. The presence of some substances in concrete, including useful and unwanted additives, can cause health concerns due to toxicity and (usually naturally occurring) radioactivity.[3] Wet concrete is highly alkaline and should always be handled with proper protective equipment. Concrete recycling is increasing in response to improved environmental awareness, legislation, and economic considerations. Conversely, the use of concrete mitigates the use of alternative building materials such as wood, which is a carbon sink [source?]. Concrete structures also last much longer than wood structures.

Carbon dioxide emissions and climate change

The cement industry is one of the two largest producers of carbon dioxide (CO2), creating up to 8% of worldwide man-made emissions of this gas, of which 50% is from the chemical process and 40% from burning fuel.[1] [4] The CO
2 produced for the manufacture of structural concrete (using ~14% cement) is estimated at 410 kg/m3 (~180 kg/tonne @ density of 2.3 g/cm3) (reduced to 290 kg/m3 with 30% fly ash replacement of cement).[5] The CO2 emission from the concrete production is directly proportional to the cement content used in the concrete mix; 900 kg of CO2 are emitted for the fabrication of every ton of cement, accounting for 88% of the emissions associated with the average concrete mix.[6][7] Cement manufacture contributes greenhouse gases both directly through the production of carbon dioxide when calcium carbonate is thermally decomposed, producing lime and carbon dioxide,[8] and also through the use of energy, particularly from the combustion of fossil fuels.

One area of the concrete life cycle worth noting is the fact that concrete has a very low embodied energy relative to the quantity that is used. This is primarily the result of the fact that the materials used in concrete construction, such as aggregates, pozzolans, and water, are relatively plentiful and can often be drawn from local sources.[9] This means that transportation only accounts for 7% of the embodied energy of concrete, while the cement production accounts for 70%. With a total embodied energy of 1.69 GJ/tonne concrete is lower than any other building material besides wood. It is worth noting that this value is based on mix proportions for concrete of no more than 20% fly ash. It is estimated that one percent replacement of cement with fly ash represents a .7% reduction in energy consumption. With some proposed mixes containing as much as 80% fly ash, this would represent a considerable energy savings.[7]

Design improvements

There is a growing interest in reducing carbon emissions related to concrete from both the academic and industrial sectors, especially with the possibility of future carbon tax implementation. Several approaches to reducing emissions have been suggested.

Cement production and use

One reason why the carbon emissions are so high is because cement has to be heated to very high temperatures in order for clinker to form. A major culprit of this is alite (Ca3SiO5), a mineral in concrete that cures within hours of pouring and is therefore responsible for much of its initial strength. However, alite also has to be heated to 1,500 °C in the clinker-forming process. Some research suggests that alite can be replaced by a different mineral, such as belite (Ca2SiO4). Belite is also a mineral already used in concrete. It has a roasting temperature of 1,200 °C, which is significantly lower than that of alite. Furthermore, belite is actually stronger once concrete cures. However, belite takes on the order of days or months to set completely, which leaves concrete weak for longer. Current research is focusing on finding possible impurity additives, like magnesium, that might speed up the curing process. It is also worthwhile to consider that belite takes more energy to grind, which may make its full life of impact similar to or even higher than alite.[10]

Another approach has been the partial replacement of conventional clinker with such alternatives as fly ash, bottom ash, and slag, all of which are by-products of other industries that would otherwise end up in landfills. Fly ash and bottom ash come from thermoelectric power plants, while slag is a waste from blast furnaces in the ironworks industry. These materials are slowly gaining popularity as additives, especially since they can potentially increase strength, decrease density, and prolong durability of concrete.[11]

The main obstacle to wider implementation of fly ash and slag may be largely due to the risk of construction with new technology that has not been exposed to long field testing. Until a carbon tax is implemented, companies are unwilling to take the chance with new concrete mix recipes even if this reduces carbon emissions. However, there are some examples of “green” concrete and its implementation. One instance is a concrete company called Ceratech that has started manufacturing concrete with 95% fly ash and 5% liquid additives.[10] Another is the I-35W Saint Anthony Falls Bridge, which was constructed with a novel mixture of concrete that included different compositions of Portland cement, fly ash, and slag depending on the portion of the bridge and its material properties requirements.[12]

Furthermore, the production of concrete requires large amounts of water, and global production accounts for almost a tenth of worldwide industrial water use.[13] This amounts to 1.7 percent of total global water withdrawal. A study that appeared in Nature Sustainability in 2018 predicts that concrete production will in the future increase pressure on water resources in regions susceptible to drought conditions: "In 2050, 75% of the water demand for concrete production will likely occur in regions that are expected to experience water stress."[14]

Carbon Concrete

Carbonatation in concrete is the formation of Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3) by chemical reaction [15]. The Speed of carbonation depends primarily on the porosity of the concrete and the moisture content. Carbonation in concrete pores happens only at a Relative Humidity (RH) of 40-90%, when RH is higher than 90% carbon dioxide cannot enter the concrete pores, and also when RH is lower than 40% CO
2 cannot be dissolved in water [16]

Pore structures in fresh concrete and air entrained concrete

Concrete can be subjected for the most part by two types of carbonation: weathering carbonation and Early age carbonation. [17]

Weathering carbonation, occurs in concrete when calcium compounds react with carbon dioxide CO
2 from the atmosphere and water in the concrete pores. The reaction is as follows:

First as in chemical weathering CO
2 reacts with water in the concrete pores to form Carbonic acid:

carbon dioxide + water → carbonic acid

Second Carbonic acid then reacts with calcium carbonate:

Ca(OH)2 + H2CO3 → CaCO3 + 2H2O

carbonic acid + calcium carbonate → calcium bicarbonate

Third Once the calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) has carbonated, the main component of Cement calcium silicate hydrate gel (also shown as C-S-H) can be decalcified, allowing the liberated CaO to carbonate:

H2CO3 + CaO → CaCO3 + H2O

Early age carbonation is when we introduce CO
2 to the early stages of fresh premix concrete or upon initial curing, it can be both natural through exposure or accelerated by augmenting a direct intake of CO
2 [18]. Gaseous carbon dioxide is converted to solid carbonates and can be permanently stored in concrete for emission reduction, the general reaction of CO2 and calcium silicate hydrate in cement was described in 1974 [19] as:

C3S + 3 CO2 + H2O → C-S-H + 3CaCO3 + 347 kJ/mol

C2S + 2 CO2 + H2O → C-S-H + 2CaCO3 + 184 KJ/mol

A Canadian company patented and commercialized a novel technology that uses the early age type of carbonation to sequester CO
2. This is achieved by directly injecting recycled liquid carbon dioxide from third party industrial emitters, into the concrete wet mix stage during the manufacturing process. Whereby a chemical reaction CO
2 becomes a mineral, sequestering the greenhouse gas pollutant in concrete infrastructures, buildings, roads, etc for long periods of time. Moreover in a study published in the journal of Cleaner Production authors preformed a model where they proved that CO
2 improved the compressive strength of the concrete while reducing CO
2 emissions as a result, in so allowing for a cement loading reduction while at the same time having a "4.6% reduction in the carbon footprint" [20]

Another proposed method of capturing emissions is to absorb CO2 in the curing process, by the use of an admixture (a dicalcium silicate y phase) as the concrete cures. The use of coal ash or another suitable substitute, could theoretically have CO2 emissions below 0 kg/m3, compared to portland cement concrete at 400 kg/m3. The most effective method of production of this concrete would use the exhaust gas of a power plant, where an isolated chamber could control temperature and humidity.[21]

In August 2019, reduced CO2 cement was announced which "reduces the overall carbon footprint in precast concrete by 70%.".[22] The base of these cement being primarily of wollastonite (CaSiO3) and rankinite (3CaO·2SiO2) in contrast to traditional portland cement alite (3CaO·SiO2) belite (2 CaO · SiO2).

The patented process of concrete making begins with the bonding of particles through liquid phase sintering also referred to as hydrothermal liquid phase densification (rHLPD)[23]. A solution mixed of H
2O and CO
2 penetrates the particles, in reaction with ambient conditions to create a bond which creates the reduced-lime, non-hydraulic calcium silicate cement (CSC). Moreover the difference between traditional portland concrete and these carbonated calcium silicate concrete (CSC-C) lies in the final curing process reaction between a water-CO
2 solution and a family of calcium-silicate: "CSC-C curing is a mildly exothermic reaction in which the low-lime calcium silicates in the CSC react with carbon dioxide in the presence of water to produce calcite (CaCO3) and silica (SiO2) as shown in Reactions II and III.

II. CaO.SiO2 + CO2 → H2O CaCO3 + SiO2

III: 3CaO.2SiO2 + 3CO2 → H2O 3CaCO3 + 2SiO2" [24]

However as early age carbonation methods have gained recognition due to its substantial carbon sequestration proficiencies, some authors argue the effect of early-age carbonation curing under weathering carbonation for precast concrete "Experimental results suggest that early-age carbonated concretes with high w/c ratios (>0.65>0.65) are more likely to be affected by weathering carbonation" [25], and advise this may weaken its strength abilities in the corrosion stages during life service.

Italian company Italcementi designed a kind of cement that is supposedly alleviating air pollution by breaking down pollutants that come in contact with the concrete, through the use of titanium dioxide absorbing ultraviolet light. Some environmental experts nevertheless remain skeptical and wonder if the special material can 'eat' enough pollutants to make it financially viable. Jubilee Church in Rome is built from this kind of concrete.[26]

Another aspect to consider in carbon concrete is Surface scaling due to cold climatic conditions and exposure to de-icing salt and freeze-thaw cycle (Frost weathering). Concrete produced by carbonation curing also shows superior performance when subject to physical degradations, e.g., freeze-thaw damage, particularly due to the pore densification effect enabled by the precipitation of carbonation products [27]

Some studies link a reduction of CO2 to concrete production, but they are mostly written by authors associated with the proposed solution or the concrete industry [28][29]. This should give concern that these solutions are Greenwashing. The CO2 emissions from concrete come from the cement in the mixture, methods to reduce the amount of the cement are the only proven methods to reduce the emissions.

Other improvements

There are many other improvements to concrete that do not deal directly with emissions. Recently, much research has gone into “smart” concretes: concretes that use electrical and mechanical signals to respond to changes in loading conditions. One variety uses carbon fiber reinforcement which provides an electrical response that can be used to measure strain . This allows for monitoring the structural integrity of the concrete without installing sensors.[30]

The road construction and maintenance industry consumes tonnes of carbon intensive concrete every day to secure road-side and urban infrastructure. As populations grow this infrastructure is becoming increasingly vulnerable to impact from vehicles, creating an ever increasing cycle of damage and waste and ever increasing consumption of concrete for repairs (roadworks are now seen around our cities on almost a daily basis). A major development in the infrastructure industry involves the use of recycled petroleum waste to protect the concrete from damage and enable infrastructure to become dynamic, able to be easily maintained and updated without disturbance to the existing foundations. This simple innovation preserves the foundations for the entire lifespan of a development.

Another area of concrete research involves the creation of certain “waterless” concretes for use in extraplanetary colonization. Most commonly, these concretes use sulfur to act as a non-reactive binder, allowing for construction of concrete structures in environments with no or very little water. These concretes are in many ways indistinguishable from normal hydraulic concrete: they have similar densities, can be used with currently existing metal reinforcement, and they actually gain strength faster than normal concrete[31] This application has yet to be explored on Earth, but with concrete production representing as much as two-thirds of the total energy usage of some developing countries,[9] any improvement is worth considering.

Surface runoff

Surface runoff, when water runs off impervious surfaces, such as non-porous concrete, can cause severe soil erosion and flooding. Urban runoff tends to pick up gasoline, motor oil, heavy metals, trash and other pollutants from sidewalks, roadways and parking lots.[32][33] Without attenuation, the impervious cover in a typical urban area limits groundwater percolation and causes five times the amount of runoff generated by a typical woodland of the same size.[34] A 2008 report by the United States National Research Council identified urban runoff as a leading source of water quality problems.[35]

In an attempt to counteract the negative effects of impervious concrete, many new paving projects have begun to use pervious concrete, which provides a level of automatic stormwater management. Pervious concrete is created by careful laying of concrete with specifically designed aggregate proportions, which allows for surface runoff to seep through and return to the groundwater. This both prevents flooding and contributes to groundwater replenishment.[36] If designed and layered properly, pervious concrete and other discreetly paved areas can also function as an automatic water filter by preventing certain harmful substances like oils and other chemicals from passing through.[37] Unfortunately there are still downsides to large scale applications of pervious concrete: its reduced strength relative to conventional concrete limits use to low-load areas, and it must be laid properly to reduce susceptibility to freeze-thaw damage and sediment buildup.[36]

Urban heat

Both concrete and asphalt are the primary contributors to what is known as the urban heat island effect.[13] According to the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs 55% of the world’s population reside in urban areas and 68% of the world’s population is projected to be urban by 2050; also, "the world is projected to add 230 billion m2 (2.5 trillion ft2) of buildings by 2060, or an area equal to the entire current global building stock. This is the equivalent of adding an entire New York City to the planet every 34 days for the next 40 years".[38]. As a result, paved surfaces represent a major concern because of the additional energy consumption and air pollution they cause. [39]

The potential of energy saving within an area is also high. With lower temperatures, the demand for air conditioning theoretically decreases, saving energy. However, research into the interaction between reflective pavements and buildings has found that, unless the nearby buildings are fitted with reflective glass, solar radiation reflected off pavements can increase building temperatures, increasing air conditioning demands.[40]

Moreover, heat transfer from pavements, which cover about one-third of a typical U.S. city [2], can also influence local temperatures and air quality. Hot surfaces warm the city air through convection, so using materials that absorb less solar energy, such as high-albedo pavements, can reduce the flow of heat into the urban environment and moderate the UHIE [41]. Albedos range from about 0.05 to about 0.35 for currently used pavement material surfaces. Over a typical life service, pavement materials that begin with high albedo tend to lose reflectance, while those with low initial albedo may gain reflectance [42]

The Design Trust for Public Space found that by slightly raising the albedo value in New York City, beneficial effects such as energy savings could be achieved.[43], by replacement of black asphalt with light-colored concrete. However, in winter this may be a disadvantage as ice will form more easily and remain longer on light colored surfaces as they will be colder due to less energy absorbed from the reduced amount of sunlight in winter. [44]

Another aspect to consider is thermal comfort effect, as well as the need for more mitigation strategies, which don’t threat the health and wellbeing of pedestrians particularly during heat waves [45]. A study that appeared in Building and Environment in 2019 preformed experiments to project the impact of heat waves and high albedo materials interactions in the northern Italian city of Milan. By calculating the "Mediterranean Outdoor Comfort Index" (MOCI) in presence of a heat wave, where high albedo materials was used in all surfaces. The study identified a deterioration of the microclimate where high amounts of high albedo materials were located. The use of the high albedo materials was found to "lead to the establishment of multiple inter-reflections and a consequent increase in micrometeorological variables such as average radiant temperatures and air temperatures. To be more detailed, these changes lead to an increase in the MOCI that in the afternoon hours can even reach 0.45 units".[46]

Overall urban configurations should remain of concern when making decisions as people are exposed to weather and thermal confort conditions. The use of high albedo materials within an urban environment can be of positive effect with proper combination of other technologies and strategies such as: vegetation, reflective materials, etc. Urban heat mitigation measures could minimize impacts on microclimate as well as human and wildlife habitats.[47]

Concrete dust

Building demolition and natural disasters such as earthquakes often release a large amount of concrete dust into the local atmosphere. Concrete dust was concluded to be the major source of dangerous air pollution following the Great Hanshin earthquake.[48]

Toxic and radioactive contamination

The presence of some substances in concrete, including useful and unwanted additives, can cause health concerns. Natural radioactive elements (K, U, Th, and Rn) can be present in various concentration in concrete dwellings, depending on the source of the raw materials used. For example, some stones naturally emit Radon, and Uranium was once common in mine refuse.[49] Toxic substances may also be unintentionally used as the result of contamination from a nuclear accident.[50] Dust from rubble or broken concrete upon demolition or crumbling may cause serious health concerns depending also on what had been incorporated in the concrete. However, embedding harmful materials in concrete is not always dangerous and may in fact be beneficial. In some cases, incorporating certain compounds such as metals in the hydration process of cement immobilizes them in a harmless state and prevents them from being released freely elsewhere.[51]

Handling precautions
Further information on safety issues associated with cement: Cement § Safety issues

Handling of wet concrete must always be done with proper protective equipment. Contact with wet concrete can cause skin chemical burns due to the caustic nature of the mixture of cement and water. Indeed, the pH of fresh cement water is highly alkaline due to the presence of free potassium and sodium hydroxides in solution (pH ~ 13.5). Eyes, hands and feet must be correctly protected to avoid any direct contact with wet concrete and washed without delay if necessary.

Concrete recycling
Main article: Concrete recycling
Recycled crushed concrete being loaded into a semi-dump truck to be used as granular fill

Concrete recycling is an increasingly common method of disposing of concrete structures. Concrete debris was once routinely shipped to landfills for disposal, but recycling is increasing due to improved environmental awareness, governmental laws and economic benefits.

Concrete, which must be free of trash, wood, paper and other such materials, is collected from demolition sites and put through a crushing machine, often along with asphalt, bricks and rocks.

Reinforced concrete contains rebar and other metallic reinforcements, which are removed with magnets and recycled elsewhere. The remaining aggregate chunks are sorted by size. Larger chunks may go through the crusher again. Smaller pieces of concrete are used as gravel for new construction projects. Aggregate base gravel is laid down as the lowest layer in a road, with fresh concrete or asphalt placed over it. Crushed recycled concrete can sometimes be used as the dry aggregate for brand new concrete if it is free of contaminants, though the use of recycled concrete limits strength and is not allowed in many jurisdictions. On 3 March 1983, a government-funded research team (the VIRL research.codep) approximated that almost 17% of worldwide landfill was by-products of concrete-based waste.

gollark: Does your foolish ”notepad” have that?
gollark: I also plan to add dark theme and file uploading.
gollark: You can manually syntax-highlight and stuff.
gollark: Oh, certainly.
gollark: Yes, definitely.

References
  1. The Cement Sustainability Initiative: Our agenda for action, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, page 20, published 1 June 2002
  2. "Cool Pavement Report" (PDF). Environmental Protection Agency. June 2005. Retrieved 6 February 2009.
  3. CDC (2015-12-07). "Radiation from Building Materials". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2019-02-25.
  4. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2018-06-13-making-concrete-change-cement-lehne-preston.pdf
  5. A. Samarin (7 September 1999), "Wastes in Concrete :Converting Liabilities into Assets", in Ravindra K. Dhir; Trevor G. Jappy (eds.), Exploiting wastes in concrete: proceedings of the international seminar held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK, Thomas Telford, p. 8, ISBN 9780727728210
  6. Mahasenan, Natesan; Steve Smith; Kenneth Humphreys; Y. Kaya (2003). "The Cement Industry and Global Climate Change: Current and Potential Future Cement Industry CO2 Emissions". Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies – 6th International Conference. Oxford: Pergamon. pp. 995–1000. doi:10.1016/B978-008044276-1/50157-4. ISBN 978-0-08-044276-1.
  7. Nisbet, M., Marceau, M., VanGeem, M. (2002). Environmental Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Concrete. http://www.nrmca.org/taskforce/item_2_talkingpoints/sustainability/sustainability/sn2137a.pdf
  8. EIA – Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the U.S. 2006-Carbon Dioxide Emissions Archived 2011-05-23 at the Wayback Machine
  9. Building Green. (1993). Cement and Concrete: Environmental Considerations. Retrieved 2 November 2015.http://www.wbcsdcement.org/pdf/tf2/cementconc.pdf
  10. Amato, Ivan (2013). "Green cement: Concrete solutions". Nature. 494 (7437): 300–301. Bibcode:2013Natur.494..300A. doi:10.1038/494300a. PMID 23426307. Retrieved 26 May 2013.
  11. Kim, H.; Lee, H. (2013). "Effects of High Volumes of Fly Ash, Blast Furnace Slag, and Bottom Ash on Flow Characteristics, Density, and Compressive Strength of High-Strength Mortar". J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (5): 662–665. doi:10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000624.
  12. Fountain, Henry (30 March 2009). "Concrete Is Remixed With Environment in Mind". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 May 2013.
  13. Watts, Jonathan (2019-02-25). "Concrete: the most destructive material on Earth". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-02-25.
  14. Miller, Sabbie A.; Horvath, Arpad; Monteiro, Paulo J. M. (January 2018). "Impacts of booming concrete production on water resources worldwide". Nature Sustainability. 1 (1): 69–76. doi:10.1038/s41893-017-0009-5. ISSN 2398-9629.
  15. Ahmad, Shamsad (May 2003). "Reinforcement corrosion in concrete structures, its monitoring and service life prediction––a review". Cement and Concrete Composites. 25 (4–5): 459–471. doi:10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00086-0.
  16. Non-destructive evaluation of reinforced concrete structures. Volume 1, Deterioration processes and standard test methods. CRC Press. 2010. pp. 28–56. ISBN 9781845699536.
  17. Aggarwal, Paratibha; Aggarwal, Yogesh (2020). "7 - Carbonation and corrosion of SCC". Self-Compacting Concrete: Materials, Properties and Applications. Woodhead Publishing. pp. 147–193. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-817369-5.00007-6. ISBN 978-0-12-817369-5.
  18. Aggarwal, Paratibha; Aggarwal, Yogesh (2020). "7 - Carbonation and corrosion of SCC". Self-Compacting Concrete: Materials, Properties and Applications. Woodhead Publishing. pp. 147–193. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-817369-5.00007-6. ISBN 978-0-12-817369-5.
  19. Young, J. F.; Berger, R. L.; Breese, J. (1974). "Accelerated Curing of Compacted Calcium Silicate Mortars on Exposure to CO2". Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 57 (9): 394–397. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb11420.x. ISSN 1551-2916.
  20. Monkman, Sean; MacDonald, Mark (November 2017). "On carbon dioxide utilization as a means to improve the sustainability of ready-mixed concrete". Journal of Cleaner Production. 167: 365–375. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.194.
  21. Higuchi, Takayuki (30 September 2014). "Development of a new ecological concrete with CO2 emissions below zero". Construction and Building Materials. 67: 338–343. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.029.
  22. Alter, Lloyd (August 15, 2019). "LafargeHolcim is selling CO2-sucking cement for precast, reduces emissions by 70 percent". TreeHugger. Retrieved 2019-08-17.
  23. Vakifahmetoglu, Cekdar; Anger, Jean Francois; Atakan, Vahit; Quinn, Sean; Gupta, Surojit; Li, Qinghua; Tang, Ling; Riman, Richard E. (2016). "Reactive Hydrothermal Liquid-Phase Densification (rHLPD) of Ceramics – A Study of the BaTiO3[TiO2] Composite System". Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 99 (12): 3893–3901. doi:10.1111/jace.14468. ISSN 1551-2916.
  24. Meyer, Vincent; de Cristofaro, Nick; Bryant, Jason; Sahu, Sada (January 2018). "Solidia Cement an Example of Carbon Capture and Utilization". Key Engineering Materials. 761: 197–203. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.761.197.
  25. Zhang, Duo; Liu, Tianlu; Shao, Yixin (April 2020). "Weathering Carbonation Behavior of Concrete Subject to Early-Age Carbonation Curing". Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 32 (4): 04020038. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003087.
  26. The Smog Eating Church of Rome
  27. Zhang, Duo; Shao, Yixin (1 October 2018). "Surface scaling of CO2-cured concrete exposed to freeze-thaw cycles". Journal of CO2 Utilization. 27: 137–144. doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2018.07.012. ISSN 2212-9820.
  28. "Reports on CO2 Uptake from the Carbonation of Concrete - CO2 balance". www.dti.dk. Retrieved 2019-11-15.
  29. "Redirecting..." cta-redirect.hubspot.com. Retrieved 2019-11-15.
  30. Chen, P.W.; Chung, D.D.L; (1996). Carbon Fiber Reinforced Concrete as an Intrinsically Smart Concrete for Damage Assessment during Static and Dynamic Loading. http://wings.buffalo.edu/academic/department/eng/mae/cmrl/Carbon%20fiber%20reinforced%20concrete%20as%20an%20intrinsically%20smart%20concrete%20for%20damage%20assessment%20during%20static%20and%20dynamic%20loading.pdf
  31. PRODUCTION OF LUNAR CONCRETE USING MOLTEN SULFUR Final Research Report for JoVe NASA Grant NAG8 - 278 by Dr. Husam A. Omar
  32. Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA; and American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. "Urban Runoff Quality Management." WEF Manual of Practice No. 23; ASCE Manual and Report on Engineering Practice No. 87. 1998. ISBN 978-1-57278-039-2. Chapter 1.
  33. G. Allen Burton, Jr.; Robert Pitt (2001). Stormwater Effects Handbook: A Toolbox for Watershed Managers, Scientists and Engineers. New York: CRC/Lewis Publishers. ISBN 978-0-87371-924-7. Chapter 2.
  34. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Washington, DC. "Protecting Water Quality from Urban Runoff." Document No. EPA 841-F-03-003. February 2003.
  35. United States. National Research Council. Washington, DC. "Urban Stormwater Management in the United States." 15 October 2008. pp. 18–20.
  36. "Pervious Concrete Pavement". US EPA. 6 August 2014.
  37. "Atlanta Is Home To Largest Permeable Pavers Project In US". news.wabe.org. 2 November 2015. Retrieved 2015-11-03.
  38. United Nations (2019). World urbanization prospects : the 2018 revision. ISBN 978-92-1-148319-2.
  39. Akbari, Hashem; Cartalis, Constantinos; Kolokotsa, Denia; Muscio, Alberto; Pisello, Anna Laura; Rossi, Federico; Santamouris, Matheos; Synnef, Afroditi; WONG, Nyuk Hien; Zinzi, Michele (18 December 2015). "Local Climate Change and Urban Heat Island Mitigation Techniques – the State of the Art". Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 22 (1): 1–16. doi:10.3846/13923730.2015.1111934.
  40. Yaghoobian, N.; Kleissl, J. (2012). "Effect of reflective pavements on building energy use". Urban Climate. 2: 25–42. doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2012.09.002.
  41. Pomerantz, Melvin (1 June 2018). "Are cooler surfaces a cost-effect mitigation of urban heat islands?". Urban Climate. 24: 393–397. doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2017.04.009. ISSN 2212-0955.
  42. Gilbert, Haley E.; Rosado, Pablo J.; Ban-Weiss, George; Harvey, John T.; Li, Hui; Mandel, Benjamin H.; Millstein, Dev; Mohegh, Arash; Saboori, Arash; Levinson, Ronnen M. (15 December 2017). "Energy and environmental consequences of a cool pavement campaign". Energy and Buildings. 157: 53–77. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.051. ISSN 0378-7788.
  43. Sabnis, Gajanan M. (2015). Green Building with Concrete: Sustainable Design and Construction, Second Edition. CRC Press. p. 12. ISBN 978-1-4987-0411-3.
  44. Worldchanging : a user's guide for the 21st century (Revised & updated ed.). ISBN 0810997460.
  45. Bloch, Sam. "Will L.A.'s Cool Pavements Make Pedestrians Too Hot?". CityLab.
  46. Falasca, Serena; Ciancio, Virgilio; Salata, Ferdinando; Golasi, Iacopo; Rosso, Federica; Curci, Gabriele (October 2019). "High albedo materials to counteract heat waves in cities: An assessment of meteorology, buildings energy needs and pedestrian thermal comfort". Building and Environment. 163: 106242. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106242.
  47. Hulley, M. E. (1 January 2012). "5 - The urban heat island effect: causes and potential solutions". Metropolitan Sustainability. Woodhead Publishing: 79–98.
  48. Yamamoto, Ryoji; Nobuhiko, Nagai; Koizumi, Naoko; Ninomiya, Ruriko (1999). "Dust concentration around the sites of demolition work after the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake". Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine. 3 (4): 207–214. doi:10.1007/BF02932260. PMC 2723556. PMID 21432527.
  49. Ademola, J. A.; Oguneletu, P. O. (2005). "Radionuclide content of concrete building blocks and radiation dose rates in some dwellings in Ibadan, Nigeria". Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 81 (1): 107–113. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.12.002. PMID 15748664.
  50. Fujita, Akiko (January 16, 2012). "Radioactive Concrete is Latest Scare for Fukushima Survivors".
  51. P.K. Mehta: Concrete technology for sustainable development – overview of essential elements, O.E. Gjorv, K. Sakai (Eds.), Concrete technology for a sustainable development in the 21st century, E&FN Spon, London (2000), pp. 83–94
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.