Bath (UK Parliament constituency)
Bath is a constituency[n 1] in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom[n 2] represented by Wera Hobhouse of the Liberal Democrats.
Bath | |
---|---|
County constituency for the House of Commons | |
Constituency location within Bath and North East Somerset, Somerset | |
Location of Somerset within England | |
County | Somerset |
Population | 88,859 (2011 census)[1] |
Electorate | 59,887 (2018)[2] |
Current constituency | |
Created | 1295 |
Member of Parliament | Wera Hobhouse (Liberal Democrats) |
Number of members | Two (1295–1918) One (1918–present) |
Perhaps its best-known representatives have been the two with international profiles: William Pitt the Elder (Prime Minister 1766–1768) and Chris Patten, the last Governor of Hong Kong (1992-1997).[n 3]
History
Bath is an ancient constituency which has been constantly represented in Parliament since boroughs were first summoned to send members in the 13th century.
Unreformed constituency before 1832
Bath was one of the cities summoned to send members in 1295 and represented ever since,[3] although Parliaments in early years were sporadic. Like almost all English constituencies before the Great Reform Act of 1832, it originally returned two members to each Parliament.[4]
The precise way in which Bath's MPs were chosen in the Middle Ages is unknown. It is recorded that "election was by the Mayor and three citizens being sent from thence to the county court who in the name of the whole community, and by the assent of the community, returned their representatives"; but whether the "assent of the community" was real or what form it took is unrecorded, even assuming it was not a completely dead letter. By the 17th century, elections had become more competitive, as the means of election in Bath had become a franchise restricted to the Mayor, Aldermen, and members of the Common Council (the City Corporation), a total of thirty voters.[4] The freemen of the city challenged this state of affairs in 1661 and again in 1705, claiming the right to vote and petitioning against the election of the candidates chosen by the corporation, but on both occasions the House of Commons, which at the time was still the final arbiter of such disputes, decided against them. The Commons resolution of 27 January 1708, "That the right of election of citizens to serve in Parliament for this city is in the mayor, aldermen and common-council only",[5] settled the matter until 1832.
Bath was the most populous of the English boroughs where the right to vote was restricted to the corporation.[4] At the time of the 1801 census, it was one of the ten largest towns or cities in England by population, and was almost unique in that the voters generally exercised their powers independently. As was the case elsewhere, the Common Council was not popularly elected, all vacancies being filled by co-option by the existing members, so that once a united interest had gained majority control it was easy to retain it. Most corporation boroughs quickly became pocket boroughs in this way, the nomination of their members of parliament being entirely decided by a patron who may have given some large benefaction to the area or simply used bribery to ensure only his supporters or croneys became members of the corporation. But in Bath, the Common Council retained its independence in most periods and took pride in electing two suitable members of parliament who had either strong local connections or else a national reputation. Nor was there any suggestion of bribery or other corruption, prolific in other "independent" constituencies. Pitt the Elder wrote to the corporation in 1761, on the occasion of his re-election as one of Bath's members, to pay tribute to "a city ranked among the most ancient and most considerable in the kingdom, and justly famed for its integrity, independence, and zeal for the public good".[6]
But even in Bath the limited electorate who voted for its members of parliament expected them to work to procure favours for their constituents and enterprises to a degree that would be considered corrupt today. By exercising efforts successfully in this direction, the representatives could in return expect a degree of influence over the voters that differed little from patronage in the pocket boroughs, except that its duration was limited. Thus the lawyer Robert Henley, a Bath MP from 1747 and also Recorder of Bath from 1751, seems to have been assumed to have control over both seats while he held one of them and immediately after; yet when he gained a peerage and thus a seat in the House of Lords, Pitt replaced him on the understanding of being independently chosen. Pitt himself then acquired similar influence: the Council vetoed Viscount Ligonier's suggestion that he should be succeeded by his nephew when he was elevated the Lords in 1763, but instead allowed Pitt to nominate a candidate to be his new colleague, and voted overwhelmingly for him when he was opposed by a local man. But Pitt's influence also waned when he fell out with the Council over the Treaty of Paris later in 1763.[7]
In the final years before the Reform Act, however, local magnates exerted a more controlling influence in Bath. Oldfield, writing early in the 19th century, stated that at that time the Marquess of Bath nominated one member and John Palmer the other; both were former members of parliament for the City (Lord Bath having sat as Viscount Weymouth, before his father's death took him to the Lords), but neither was then in the Commons – each had a relation sitting as one of the members for Bath. Palmer had succeeded Earl Camden[n 4] who held one of the two seats before 1802. At the time of the Reform Act, the Lord Bath was still being listed as influencing one of the seats, although the second was considered independent once more.[8]
Reformed constituency (1832–1918)
The Great Reform Act opened up the franchise to all resident (male) householders whose houses had a value of at least £10 a year and imposed uniform voting provisions for all the boroughs. Bath was one of the boroughs which continued to elect two members. Given the city's medium size and its generally high property values, its electorate increased by a factor of almost 100[n 5], from 30 in 1831 to 2,853 in 1832,[9] and created a competitive and generally marginal constituency which swung between Whig and Tory (later Liberal and Conservative) control. The parliamentary borough's boundaries were also slightly extended, but only to take in those areas into which the built-up area of the city had expanded. Bath's most notable member during this period was probably the Conservative social reformer Lord Ashley, better remembered under his eventual title of 7th Earl of Shaftesbury, for the Factory Acts, the first of which came into effect while he was one of the MPs for Bath.[10]
The franchise was further reformed in 1867 and 1885 with only minor boundary changes. Bath was lucky to retain its two-member representation in the 1885 reforms, as its electorate of under 7,000 was near the lower limit, and this situation lasted until the 1918 reforms.[11] The continued Liberal strength was unusual for a prosperous and predominantly middle-class town, and the seats could until 1918 not be considered safe for the Conservatives.[12]
Modern single-member constituency (since 1918)
Bath's representation was reduced to a single member in 1918. The Conservatives held the seat continuously until 1992, except in the 1923 Parliament, and until World War II generally won comfortably – the Liberals retained such strength that the non-Conservative vote was split, and Labour could not rise above third place until the landslide of 1945, when the Conservative James Pitman achieved a very marginal majority. From 1945 to 1970, Labour presented the main challenge, and came within 800 votes of taking the seat in 1966.
The Liberal revival in the 1970s saw the two more left-wing parties swap places, helped by the adoption of a nationally known candidate, Christopher Mayhew, who had defected from the Labour Party.[13] The formation of the SDP–Liberal Alliance made Bath a realistic target. The SDP came 1500 votes from winning in 1987 under Malcolm Dean. In 1992, Conservative Chris Patten was ousted by Liberal Democrat Don Foster in a narrow defeat widely blamed on Patten's strategising, campaign leading and communicating as Conservative Party chairman rather than canvassing his own constituents.[14] At each election from 1992 to 2015, a different Conservative candidate contested the constituency.
The boundary changes implemented in 1997 took Bathampton, Batheaston, Bathford, Charlcombe and Freshford from the Wansdyke district, containing about 7,000 voters; these were moved elsewhere in 2010. Nominally, these areas had a slightly higher tendency to prefer a Conservative candidate but, the national government suffering from sleaze, in 1997 Don Foster more than doubled his almost 4,000 vote majority to over 9,000 votes. After winning two intervening elections, in 2010 Foster achieved his highest majority to date of 11,883 votes.[15]
In the 2015 general election, following the national Liberal Democrat collapse and Foster standing down, the seat was regained by the Conservatives under Ben Howlett with a 3,833-vote majority.[16]
Bath is estimated to have voted to remain in the European Union by 68.3% in the 2016 referendum on the UK's membership of the EU.[17]
In the 2017 general election, the constituency was regained by the Liberal Democrats' Wera Hobhouse, with the second-highest Liberal Democrat vote share increase nationally (after Richmond Park).[18]
Boundaries
Bath is one of only two UK Parliament constituencies to be surrounded by another constituency. Bath is entirely surrounded by the North East Somerset constituency. The other constituency, York Central, is entirely surrounded by York Outer.
Current boundaries
Following the review of the constituencies in the former county of Avon carried out by the Boundary Commission for England, as of the 2010 general election the constituency covers only the city of Bath, and none of the surrounding rural area. Between 1997 and 2010, it also included some outlying villages such as Southstoke and Freshford now in the North East Somerset constituency. The changes in 2010 also resulted in Bath becoming a borough constituency, instead of a county constituency as it was before. In 2019 prior to the local elections, the Abbey Ward was abolished and became part of the Kingsmead ward, the Oldfield Park ward saw the creation of the Moorland ward.[19]
The constituency's electoral wards are:[n 6]
Historic boundaries
- Before 1832: The parishes of St James (Bath), St Peter and St Paul (Bath), and St Michael (Bath), and part of the parish of Walcot
- 1832–1867: As above, plus the parishes of Bathwick and Lyncombe & Widcombe, and a further part of the parish of Walcot
- 1867–1918: As above, plus part of the parish of Twerton
- 1918–1983: The county borough of Bath (boundary changes in 1955)
- 1983–1997: The City of Bath (no boundary changes)
- 1997–2010: The City of Bath, and the District of Wansdyke wards of Bathampton, Batheaston, Bathford, Charlcombe, and Freshford
Members of Parliament
The current Member of Parliament is Wera Hobhouse of the Liberal Democrats.
William Pitt the Elder was briefly Prime Minister from 30 July 1766 while a Bath MP ending when on 4 August 1766 he was raised to the peerage as Earl of Chatham.
Members of Parliament 1295–1640
- Constituency created (1295)
Members of Parliament 1640–1918
Members of Parliament since 1918
Election | Member | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
1918 | Charles Foxcroft | Unionist | |
1923 | Frank Raffety | Liberal | |
1924 | Charles Foxcroft | Unionist | |
1929 | Charles Baillie-Hamilton | Unionist | |
1931 | Loel Guinness | Conservative | |
1945 | Sir James Pitman | Conservative | |
1964 | Sir Edward Brown | Conservative | |
1979 | Chris Patten | Conservative | |
1992 | Don Foster | Liberal Democrat | |
2015 | Ben Howlett | Conservative | |
2017 | Wera Hobhouse | Liberal Democrat | |
Elections
Elections in the 2010s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Democrats | Wera Hobhouse | 28,419 | 54.5 | +7.2 | |
Conservative | Annabel Tall | 16,097 | 30.9 | −4.9 | |
Labour | Mike Davies | 6,639 | 12.7 | −1.9 | |
Brexit Party | Jimi Ogunnusi | 642 | 1.2 | N/A | |
Independent | Bill Blockhead | 341 | 0.7 | N/A | |
Majority | 12,322 | 23.4 | +11.9 | ||
Turnout | 52,330 | 77.2 | +2.9 | ||
Liberal Democrats hold | Swing | +6.1 |
This was the largest Lib Dem majority (by percentage) and the second largest by number at the 2019 General Election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Democrats | Wera Hobhouse | 23,436 | 47.3 | +17.6 | |
Conservative | Ben Howlett | 17,742 | 35.8 | −2.0 | |
Labour | Joe Rayment | 7,279 | 14.7 | +1.5 | |
Green | Eleanor Field | 1,125 | 2.3 | −9.7 | |
Majority | 5,694 | 11.5 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 49,582 | 74.3 | −1.2 | ||
Liberal Democrats gain from Conservative | Swing | +9.8 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Ben Howlett[48] | 17,833 | 37.8 | +6.4 | |
Liberal Democrats | Steve Bradley[49] | 14,000 | 29.7 | −26.9 | |
Labour | Ollie Middleton[50][51] | 6,216 | 13.2 | +6.3 | |
Green | Dominic Tristram[52] | 5,634 | 11.9 | +9.6 | |
UKIP | Julian Deverell[53] | 2,922 | 6.2 | +4.3 | |
Independent | Loraine Morgan-Brinkhurst[54][55] | 499 | 1.1 | N/A | |
English Democrat | Jenny Knight | 63 | 0.1 | N/A | |
Majority | 3,833 | 8.1 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 47,167 | 77.5 | +5.7 | ||
Conservative gain from Liberal Democrats | Swing | +16.7 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Democrats | Don Foster | 26,651 | 56.6 | +11.2 | |
Conservative | Fabian Richter | 14,768 | 31.4 | −0.5 | |
Labour | Hattie Ajderian | 3,251 | 6.9 | −7.5 | |
Green | Eric Lucas | 1,120 | 2.4 | −3.6 | |
UKIP | Ernie Warrender | 890 | 1.9 | +0.2 | |
Christian | Steve Hewett | 250 | 0.5 | N/A | |
Independent | A.N.ON | 69 | 0.1 | N/A | |
Independent | Sean Geddis | 56 | 0.1 | N/A | |
All The South Party | Robert Craig | 31 | 0.1 | N/A | |
Majority | 11,883 | 25.2 | +15.1 | ||
Turnout | 47,086 | 71.8 | +2.7 | ||
Liberal Democrats hold | Swing | +5.8 |
Elections in the 2000s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Democrats | Don Foster | 20,101 | 43.9 | −6.6 | |
Conservative | Sian Dawson | 15,463 | 33.7 | +4.6 | |
Labour | Harriet Ajderian | 6,773 | 14.8 | −0.9 | |
Green | Eric Lucas | 2,494 | 5.4 | +2.2 | |
UKIP | Richard Crowder | 770 | 1.7 | +0.2 | |
Independent | Patrick Cobbe | 177 | 0.4 | N/A | |
Independent | Graham Walker | 58 | 0.1 | N/A | |
Majority | 4,638 | 10.1 | −11.3 | ||
Turnout | 45,836 | 68.6 | +3.7 | ||
Liberal Democrats hold | Swing | −5.6 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Democrats | Don Foster | 23,372 | 50.5 | +2.0 | |
Conservative | Ashley Fox | 13,478 | 29.1 | −2.1 | |
Labour | Marilyn Hawkings | 7,269 | 15.7 | −0.7 | |
Green | Michael Boulton | 1,469 | 3.2 | +2.1 | |
UKIP | Andrew Tettenborn | 708 | 1.5 | +0.9 | |
Majority | 9,894 | 21.4 | +4.1 | ||
Turnout | 46,296 | 64.9 | −11.3 | ||
Liberal Democrats hold | Swing | +2.1 |
Elections in the 1990s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Democrats | Don Foster | 26,169 | 48.5 | −0.4 | |
Conservative | Alison McNair | 16,850 | 31.2 | −9.4 | |
Labour | Tim Bush | 8,828 | 16.4 | +8.6 | |
Referendum | Tony Cook | 1,192 | 2.2 | N/A | |
Green | Richard Scrase | 580 | 1.1 | +0.3 | |
UKIP | Peter Sandell | 315 | 0.6 | N/A | |
Natural Law | Nicholas Pullen | 55 | 0.1 | N/A | |
Majority | 9,319 | 17.3 | +10.2 | ||
Turnout | 53,989 | 76.2 | −9.3 | ||
Liberal Democrats hold | Swing | +4.9 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Democrats | Don Foster | 25,718 | 48.9 | +6.3 | |
Conservative | Chris Patten | 21,950 | 41.8 | −3.6 | |
Labour | Pamela Richards | 4,102 | 7.8 | −2.8 | |
Green | Duncan McCanlis | 433 | 0.8 | −0.5 | |
Liberal | May Barker | 172 | 0.3 | +0.3 | |
Anti-Federalist League | Alan Sked | 117 | 0.2 | +0.2 | |
Independent | John Rumming | 79 | 0.2 | +0.2 | |
Majority | 3,768 | 7.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 52,571 | 82.4 | +2.9 | ||
Liberal Democrats gain from Conservative | Swing | +4.9 | |||
Elections in the 1980s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Chris Patten | 23,515 | 45.4 | −1.7 | |
SDP | Malcolm Dean | 22,103 | 42.7 | +6.7 | |
Labour | Jenny Smith | 5,507 | 10.6 | −4.6 | |
Green | Derek Wall | 687 | 1.3 | +0.4 | |
Majority | 1,412 | 2.7 | −8.4 | ||
Turnout | 51,812 | 79.4 | +5.0 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | −4.2 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Chris Patten | 22,544 | 47.1 | +0.7 | |
SDP | Malcolm Dean | 17,240 | 36.0 | +8.0 | |
Labour | Adrian Pott | 7,259 | 15.2 | −7.8 | |
Ecology | Don Grimes | 441 | 0.9 | −1.3 | |
Progressive Liberal | R. S. Wandle | 319 | 0.7 | N/A | |
World Government | Gilbert Young | 67 | 0.1 | N/A | |
Majority | 5,304 | 11.1 | -7.3 | ||
Turnout | 47,870 | 74.4 | -3.7 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | -4.4 |
Elections in the 1970s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Chris Patten | 23,025 | 46.4 | +8.7 | |
Liberal | Christopher Mayhew | 13,913 | 28.0 | −5.3 | |
Labour | M. Baber | 11,407 | 23.0 | −5.6 | |
Ecology | Don Grimes | 1,082 | 2.2 | N/A | |
National Front | Thomas Mundy | 206 | 0.4 | N/A | |
Majority | 9,112 | 18.4 | +14.0 | ||
Turnout | 49,633 | 78.1 | -0.5 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +7.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edward Brown | 18,470 | 37.7 | −3.0 | |
Liberal | Christopher Mayhew | 16,348 | 33.4 | +2.7 | |
Labour | Malcolm Bishop | 14,011 | 28.6 | +0.59 | |
United Democratic | John Vernon Kemp | 150 | 0.3 | N/A | |
Majority | 2,122 | 4.3 | −5.8 | ||
Turnout | 48,979 | 78.6 | -4.4 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | −2.9 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edward Brown | 20,920 | 40.8 | −8.2 | |
Liberal | Peter Downey | 15,738 | 30.7 | +17.6 | |
Labour | Malcolm Bishop | 14,396 | 27.9 | −8.2 | |
Ind. Conservative | H. B. de Laterriere | 204 | 0.4 | +0.4 | |
World Government | Gilbert Young | 118 | 0.2 | −1.6 | |
Majority | 5,182 | 10.1 | −2.7 | ||
Turnout | 51,376 | 83.0 | +5.9 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | −12.9 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edward Brown | 22,344 | 49.0 | +6.0 | |
Labour | David Young | 16,493 | 36.1 | −5.1 | |
Liberal | Roger H. Crowther | 5,957 | 13.1 | −2.7 | |
World Government | Gilbert Young | 840 | 1.8 | +1.8 | |
Majority | 5,851 | 12.8 | +11.0 | ||
Turnout | 45,634 | 77.1 | -3.4 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +5.5 |
Elections in the 1960s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edward Brown | 19,344 | 43.0 | ||
Labour | Frederick S. Moorhouse | 18,544 | 41.2 | ||
Liberal | Roger H. Crowther | 7,095 | 15.8 | ||
Majority | 800 | 1.8 | |||
Turnout | 44,983 | 80.5 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edward Brown | 22,255 | 46.5 | ||
Labour | Frederick S. Moorhouse | 16,464 | 34.4 | ||
Liberal | Brian R. Pamplin | 8,795 | 18.4 | ||
World Government | Gilbert Young | 318 | 0.7 | ||
Majority | 5,791 | 12.1 | |||
Turnout | 45,832 | 84.2 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Elections in the 1950s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | James Pitman | 24,048 | 50.33 | ||
Labour | George E Mayer | 17,515 | 36.66 | ||
Liberal | George Allen | 6,214 | 13.01 | ||
Majority | 6,533 | 13.67 | |||
Turnout | 47,777 | 83.60 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | James Pitman | 24,489 | 51.94 | ||
Labour Co-op | Thomas W Richardson | 17,646 | 37.43 | ||
Liberal | Barbara Burwell | 5,011 | 10.63 | ||
Majority | 6,843 | 14.51 | |||
Turnout | 47.146 | 82.46 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | James Pitman | 27,826 | 55.26 | ||
Labour | Victor Mishcon | 22,530 | 44.74 | ||
Majority | 5,296 | 10.52 | |||
Turnout | 85.64 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | James Pitman | 23,070 | 47.16 | ||
Labour | Hugh Bruce Oliphant Cardew | 19,340 | 39.54 | ||
Liberal | Philip William Hopkins | 6,508 | 13.30 | ||
Majority | 3,730 | 7.63 | |||
Turnout | 87.28 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Elections in the 1940s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | James Pitman | 20,196 | 43.6 | ||
Labour | Dorothy Archibald | 18,120 | 39.2 | ||
Liberal | Philip William Hopkins | 7,952 | 17.2 | ||
Majority | 2,076 | 4.5 | |||
Turnout | 46,268 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Election in the 1930s
General Election 1939/40:
Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1940. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by the Autumn of 1939, the following candidates had been selected;
- Conservative: Lord Ronaldshay[66]
- Liberal: Philip William Hopkins[67]
- Labour: George Gilbert Desmond[68]
- A minority of Bath Conservatives, led by the town Mayor, Adrian Hopkins objected to Ronaldshay who had no link with the town. Hopkins was considering running as an Independent.[69] Desmond was under pressure to withdraw in favour of the Liberal candidate fighting on a Popular Front programme
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Loel Guinness | 20,670 | 56.6 | −7.4 | |
Liberal | Sidney Reginald Daniels | 8,650 | 23.7 | +2.4 | |
Labour | George Gilbert Desmond | 7,185 | 19.7 | +5.0 | |
Majority | 12,020 | 32.9 | −9.8 | ||
Turnout | 74.5 | −6.0 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | −4.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Loel Guinness | 24,696 | 64.0 | +17.1 | |
Liberal | Sidney Reginald Daniels | 8,241 | 21.3 | −8.8 | |
Labour | George Gilbert Desmond | 5,680 | 14.7 | −8.3 | |
Majority | 16,455 | 42.6 | +25.8 | ||
Turnout | 80.6 | −0.7 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | +12.9 |
Election in the 1920s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Charles Baillie-Hamilton | 17,845 | 46.9 | +1.8 | |
Liberal | Sidney Reginald Daniels | 11,485 | 30.1 | +0.8 | |
Labour | George Gilbert Desmond | 8,769 | 23.0 | −2.7 | |
Majority | 6,360 | 16.8 | +1.0 | ||
Turnout | 81.3 | +8.5 | |||
Unionist hold | Swing | +0.5 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Charles Baillie-Hamilton | 11,171 | 45.1 | −10.7 | |
Liberal | Sidney Reginald Daniels | 7,255 | 29.3 | −1.3 | |
Labour | George Gilbert Desmond | 6,359 | 25.7 | +12.1 | |
Majority | 3916 | 15.8 | −9.4 | ||
Turnout | 24,785 | 72.8 | −11.7 | ||
Unionist hold | Swing | −4.6 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Charles Foxcroft | 16,067 | 55.8 | +7.4 | |
Liberal | Frank Raffety | 8,800 | 30.6 | −21.0 | |
Labour | Walter Barton Scobell | 3,914 | 13.6 | +13.6 | |
Majority | 7,267 | 25.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 84.5 | +5.4 | |||
Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | +14.2 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Frank Raffety | 13,694 | 51.6 | +19.6 | |
Unionist | Charles Foxcroft | 12,830 | 48.4 | −1.8 | |
Majority | 864 | 3.2 | 21.4 | ||
Turnout | 79.1 | N/A | |||
Liberal gain from Unionist | Swing | +10.7 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Charles Foxcroft | 13,666 | 50.2 | −24.6 | |
Liberal | Harold Spender | 8,699 | 32.0 | n/a | |
Labour | Herbert Elvin | 4,849 | 17.8 | −7.4 | |
Majority | |||||
Turnout | 82.4 | ||||
Unionist hold | Swing |
Election in the 1910s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Unionist | Charles Foxcroft | 15,605 | 74.8 | N/A |
Labour | Alfred James Bethell | 5,244 | 25.2 | N/A | |
Majority | 10,361 | 49.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 20,849 | 66.2 | n/a | ||
Registered electors | 31,512 | ||||
Unionist hold | Swing | n/a | |||
C indicates candidate endorsed by the coalition government. |
General Election 1914/15:
Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1915. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by July 1914, the following candidates had been selected;
- Unionist: Charles Hunter, Lord Alexander Thynne
- Liberal: Harry Geen,[72] J.C. Meggott[73]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Lord Alexander Thynne | 3,875 | 26.0 | +0.2 | |
Conservative | Charles Hunter | 3,841 | 25.7 | +0.4 | |
Liberal | George Peabody Gooch | 3,631 | 24.3 | −0.2 | |
Liberal | George Hardy | 3,585 | 24.0 | −0.4 | |
Majority | 210 | 1.4 | +0.6 | ||
Turnout | 92.0 | −2.7 | |||
Registered electors | 8,144 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +0.2 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | +0.4 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Lord Alexander Thynne | 3,961 | 25.8 | +4.1 | |
Conservative | Charles Hunter | 3,889 | 25.3 | +3.8 | |
Liberal | Donald Maclean | 3,771 | 24.5 | −4.0 | |
Liberal | George Peabody Gooch | 3,757 | 24.4 | −3.9 | |
Majority | 118 | 0.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 94.7 | +3.9 | |||
Registered electors | 8,144 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +2.1 | |||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +3.9 | |||
Elections in the 1900s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Donald Maclean | 4,102 | 28.5 | +6.9 | |
Liberal | George Peabody Gooch | 4,069 | 28.3 | +7.2 | |
Conservative | Lord Alexander Thynne | 3,123 | 21.7 | −6.8 | |
Conservative | Wyndham Murray | 3,088 | 21.5 | −7.3 | |
Majority | 946 | 6.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 90.8 | +7.3 | |||
Registered electors | 7,968 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +6.9 | |||
Liberal gain from Liberal Unionist | Swing | +7.3 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Wyndham Murray | 3,486 | 28.8 | +1.5 | |
Liberal Unionist | Edmond Wodehouse | 3,439 | 28.5 | +1.8 | |
Liberal | Donald Maclean | 2,605 | 21.6 | −1.6 | |
Liberal | Alpheus Morton | 2,549 | 21.1 | −1.7 | |
Turnout | 83.5 | −6.2 | |||
Registered electors | 7,300 | ||||
Majority | 881 | 7.2 | +3.1 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +1.6 | |||
Majority | 834 | 6.9 | +3.4 | ||
Liberal Unionist hold | Swing | +1.8 |
Elections in the 1890s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Wyndham Murray | 3,445 | 27.3 | +1.2 | |
Liberal Unionist | Edmond Wodehouse | 3,358 | 26.7 | +0.9 | |
Liberal | Martin Conway | 2,917 | 23.2 | −1.0 | |
Liberal | John Fuller | 2,865 | 22.8 | −1.1 | |
Turnout | 89.7 | +0.4 | |||
Registered electors | 7,059 | ||||
Majority | 528 | 4.1 | +2.2 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +1.1 | |||
Majority | 441 | 3.5 | +1.9 | ||
Liberal Unionist hold | Swing | +1.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Wyndham Murray | 3,198 | 26.1 | −1.7 | |
Liberal Unionist | Edmond Wodehouse | 3,177 | 25.8 | −2.5 | |
Liberal | Thomas P Baptie[79] | 2,981 | 24.2 | +2.0 | |
Liberal | John Miller Adye | 2,941 | 23.9 | +2.2 | |
Turnout | 89.3 | +0.9 | |||
Registered electors | 6,922 | ||||
Majority | 217 | 1.9 | −3.7 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | −1.9 | |||
Majority | 196 | 1.6 | −4.5 | ||
Liberal Unionist hold | Swing | −2.3 |
Elections in the 1880s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | Edmond Wodehouse | 3,309 | 28.3 | +1.9 | |
Conservative | Robert Peter Laurie | 3,244 | 27.8 | +3.3 | |
Liberal | Arthur Hayter | 2,588 | 22.2 | −2.2 | |
Liberal | Frederick Verney | 2,529 | 21.7 | −2.8 | |
Turnout | 5,870 | 88.4 | −3.5 | ||
Registered electors | 6,637 | ||||
Majority | 721 | 6.1 | +4.1 | ||
Liberal Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | +2.1 | |||
Majority | 656 | 5.6 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +3.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert Stickney Blaine | 3,208 | 26.4 | +2.8 | |
Liberal | Edmond Wodehouse | 2,990 | 24.7 | −2.3 | |
Conservative | Robert Peter Laurie | 2,971 | 24.5 | +2.1 | |
Liberal | Arthur Hayter | 2,953 | 24.4 | −2.7 | |
Turnout | 6,099 | 91.9 | +1.4 (est) | ||
Registered electors | 6,637 | ||||
Majority | 255 | 2.0 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +2.8 | |||
Majority | 19 | 0.2 | −3.2 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | −2.2 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Arthur Hayter | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
- Caused by Hayter's appointment as a Lord Commissioner of the Treasury.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Arthur Hayter | 2,712 | 27.1 | +1.0 | |
Liberal | Edmond Wodehouse | 2,700 | 27.0 | +2.2 | |
Conservative | Reginald Hardy | 2,359 | 23.6 | −1.2 | |
Conservative | Thomas James Smyth | 2,241 | 22.4 | −1.9 | |
Majority | 341 | 3.4 | +2.1 | ||
Turnout | 5,006 (est) | 90.5 (est) | +2.0 | ||
Registered electors | 5,534 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +1.1 | |||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +2.1 | |||
Elections in the 1870s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Arthur Hayter | 2,520 | 26.1 | −10.9 | |
Conservative | Nathaniel Bousfield | 2,397 | 24.8 | +9.6 | |
Liberal | John William Nicholas Hervey[82] | 2,391 | 24.8 | −7.9 | |
Conservative | Arthur Egerton | 2,348 | 24.3 | +9.1 | |
Turnout | 4,828 (est) | 88.5 (est) | +1.8 | ||
Registered electors | 5,454 | ||||
Majority | 123 | 1.3 | −1.1 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | −10.0 | |||
Majority | 6 | 0.0 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +8.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Arthur Hayter | 2,210 | 50.9 | −18.8 | |
Conservative | William Forsyth[83] | 2,071 | 47.7 | +17.4 | |
Independent Liberal | Charles Thompson[84] | 57 | 1.3 | N/A | |
Majority | 139 | 3.2 | +0.8 | ||
Turnout | 4,338 | 83.7 | −3.0 | ||
Registered electors | 5,182 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −18.1 |
- Caused by Dalrymple's death.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Arthur Egerton | 2,194 | 50.4 | +20.1 | |
Liberal | Arthur Hayter | 2,143 | 49.2 | −20.5 | |
Independent Liberal | John Charles Cox[85][86] | 15 | 0.3 | N/A | |
Majority | 51 | 1.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 4,352 | 84.0 | −2.7 | ||
Registered electors | 5,182 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +20.3 |
- Caused by Cadogan's elevation to the peerage, becoming Earl Cadogan.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Viscount Chelsea | 2,251 | 53.1 | +22.8 | |
Liberal | Jerom Murch[87] | 1,991 | 46.9 | −22.8 | |
Majority | 260 | 6.1 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 4,242 | 81.9 | −4.8 | ||
Registered electors | 5,182 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +22.8 |
- Caused by Tite's death.
Elections in the 1860s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Tite | 2,478 | 37.0 | N/A | |
Liberal | Donald Dalrymple | 2,187 | 32.7 | N/A | |
Conservative | James Hogg | 2,024 | 30.3 | N/A | |
Majority | 163 | 2.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 4,357 (est) | 86.7 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 5,024 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Tite | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | James Hogg | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 2,960 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1850s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Tite | 1,349 | 34.7 | +1.7 | |
Conservative | Arthur Edwin Way | 1,339 | 34.5 | +1.6 | |
Liberal | Thomas Phinn | 1,198 | 30.8 | −3.3 | |
Turnout | 2,613 (est) | 82.0 (est) | +5.1 | ||
Registered electors | 3,185 | ||||
Majority | 10 | 0.3 | +0.2 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | +0.5 | |||
Majority | 141 | 3.6 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +1.2 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Arthur Elton | 1,243 | 34.1 | −0.3 | |
Whig | William Tite | 1,200 | 33.0 | −0.3 | |
Conservative | Arthur Edwin Way | 1,197 | 32.9 | +0.6 | |
Majority | 3 | 0.1 | −0.9 | ||
Turnout | 2,419 (est) | 76.9 (est) | −1.3 | ||
Registered electors | 3,144 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | −0.3 | |||
Whig hold | Swing | −0.3 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Tite | 1,176 | 51.0 | −16.7 | |
Peelite | William Whateley[88] | 1,129 | 49.0 | +16.7 | |
Majority | 47 | 0.2 | −0.8 | ||
Turnout | 2,305 | 73.1 | −5.1 | ||
Registered electors | 3,155 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | −16.7 |
- Caused by Phinn's resignation after his appointment as Assistant Secretary to the Admiralty
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | George Treweeke Scobell | 1,332 | 34.4 | +17.3 | |
Whig | Thomas Phinn | 1,290 | 33.3 | +16.2 | |
Peelite | William Whateley[89][90] | 1,253 | 32.3 | −3.2 | |
Majority | 37 | 1.0 | −2.8 | ||
Turnout | 2,564 (est) | 78.2 (est) | −8.1 | ||
Registered electors | 3,278 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | +9.5 | |||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | +8.9 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | George Treweeke Scobell | 1,110 | 51.6 | +17.5 | |
Conservative | William Sutcliffe[91] | 1,041 | 48.4 | +12.9 | |
Majority | 69 | 3.2 | −0.6 | ||
Turnout | 2,151 | 68.7 | −17.6 | ||
Registered electors | 3,310 | ||||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | +2.3 | |||
- Caused by Ashley-Cooper's succession to the peerage, becoming 7th Earl of Shaftesbury
Elections in the 1840s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Anthony Ashley-Cooper | 1,278 | 35.5 | −8.4 | |
Whig | Adam Haldane-Duncan | 1,228 | 34.1 | +5.2 | |
Radical | John Arthur Roebuck | 1,093 | 30.4 | +3.1 | |
Turnout | 2,439 (est) | 86.3 (est) | +13.0 | ||
Registered electors | 2,825 | ||||
Majority | 50 | 1.4 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Radical | Swing | −6.8 | |||
Majority | 135 | 3.8 | +2.2 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | +4.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Adam Haldane-Duncan | 1,223 | 28.9 | +4.7 | |
Radical | John Arthur Roebuck | 1,157 | 27.3 | +4.5 | |
Conservative | William Heald Ludlow Bruges | 930 | 22.0 | −3.7 | |
Conservative | Richard Wingfield | 926 | 21.9 | −5.4 | |
Turnout | 2,189 | 73.3 | +4.3 | ||
Registered electors | 2,985 | ||||
Majority | 66 | 1.6 | N/A | ||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | +4.6 | |||
Majority | 227 | 5.4 | N/A | ||
Radical gain from Conservative | Swing | +4.5 | |||
Elections in the 1830s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Richard Wingfield | 1,087 | 27.3 | +14.9 | |
Conservative | William Heald Ludlow Bruges | 1,024 | 25.7 | +13.3 | |
Whig | Charles Palmer | 962 | 24.2 | −14.4 | |
Radical | John Arthur Roebuck | 910 | 22.8 | −13.8 | |
Majority | 62 | 1.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 2,051 | 69.0 | +4.7 | ||
Registered electors | 2,973 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +14.7 | |||
Conservative gain from Radical | Swing | +13.6 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Palmer | 1,097 | 38.6 | −2.1 | |
Radical | John Arthur Roebuck | 1,042 | 36.6 | +5.6 | |
Conservative | Henry Daubeney[92] | 706 | 24.8 | N/A | |
Turnout | 1,776 | 64.3 | −17.3 | ||
Registered electors | 2,764 | ||||
Majority | 55 | 1.9 | −7.7 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −3.9 | |||
Majority | 336 | 11.8 | +9.1 | ||
Radical hold | Swing | +3.9 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Palmer | 1,492 | 40.7 | N/A | |
Radical | John Arthur Roebuck | 1,138 | 31.0 | N/A | |
Whig | Henry William Hobhouse | 1,040 | 28.3 | N/A | |
Turnout | 2,329 | 81.6 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 2,853 | ||||
Majority | 354 | 9.6 | N/A | ||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Majority | 98 | 2.7 | N/A | ||
Radical gain from Tory | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Palmer | Unopposed | |||
Tory | John Thynne | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold | |||||
Tory hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Palmer | Unopposed | |||
Tory | John Thynne | Unopposed | |||
Whig gain from Tory | |||||
Tory hold |
Notes and references
- Notes
- A borough constituency (for the purposes of election expenses and type of returning officer)
- Previously represented by two MPs in the House of Commons of England
- Conservative Party chairman 1990–1992 and last Governor of Hong Kong.
- Formerly known as John Jeffreys Pratt
- 2,853 voters registered at the first reformed election, in December 1832)
- These form the City of Bath in Bath and North East Somerset
- References
- "Bath: Usual Resident Population, 2011". Neighbourhood Statistics. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 28 January 2015.
- "England Parliamentary electorates 2010-2018". Boundary Commission for England. Retrieved 23 March 2019.
- "2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies in England" (PDF). Boundary Commission for England. p. 28. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
- "Bath Borough 1690-1715". The History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
- Oldfield, Thomas (1820). A Key to the House of Commons. Being a history of the last general election in 1818 ... to which is added, an abstract of the state of representation in Scotland and Ireland. p. 160 – via Google Books.
- "Bath Double Member Borough". The History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
- Namier, Lewis; Brooke, John (1985). The House of Commons 1754-1790. Boydell & Brewer. p. 366. ISBN 9780436304200 – via Google Books.
- Thorne, RG (1986). The House of Commons. Boydell & Brewer. pp. 343–344. ISBN 9780436521010 – via Google Books.
- "The English Reform Legislation". The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1820-1832, ed. D.R. Fisher, 2009. The History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
- Hodder, Edwin (2014). The Life and Work of the Seventh Earl of Shaftesbury, K.G. Cambridge University Press. p. 245. ISBN 9781108075541 – via Google Books.
- "Third Reform Act 1884". Parliament UK. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
- Thorpe, Andrew. "One of the most backward areas of the Country: The Labour Party's Grassroots in South West England, 1918-45" (PDF). Exeter University. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
- Adams, Michael (9 January 1997). "Obituary: Lord Mayhew". The Independent. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
- "BBC Rewind: Chris Patten loses Bath". BBC News. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
- "Don Foster Lord Foster of Bath". Liberal Democrats. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
- Crawley, James (31 May 2017). "'Marginal Bath seat could prove vital for Tories in General Election' - Theresa May". Bath Chronicle. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
- C. Hanretty. "Final estimates of the Leave vote share in the EU referendum". Retrieved 10 June 2017 – via Google Docs.
- "GE2017 - Constituency results". Britain Elects. Retrieved 10 June 2017 – via Google Docs.
- "Election Timetable in England" (PDF) – via Gov.UK.
- "History of Parliament 1386-1421". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
- "CHAPMAN, William, of Arundel, Suss". History of Parliament Online.
- "History of Parliament 1509-1558". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
- Wroughton, John (2006). Tudor Bath – Life and strife in the little city, 1485–1603. Bath: Lansdown Press. pp. 58–59. ISBN 0-9520249-6-9.
- "History of Parliament 1558-1603". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
- "Bath 1820-1832". The History of Parliament. The History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 24 September 2012.
- Popham was also elected for Wiltshire
- Field Marshal from 1743
- Created Viscount Ligonier (in the Peerage of Ireland), December 1757
- Stooks Smith, Henry (1845). The Parliaments of England, from 1st George I, to the Present Time. Vol II: Oxfordshire to Wales Inclusive. London: Simpkin, Marshall, & Co. pp. 26–28. Retrieved 26 October 2018 – via Google Books.
- Styled Viscount Bayham from May 1786
- Aitken, George Atherton (1895). Lee, Sidney (ed.). Dictionary of National Biography. 43. London: Smith, Elder & Co. . In
- The Annual Register, or a View of the History and Politics, of the Year 1841. J. G. & F. Rivington. 1842. p. 65. Retrieved 8 April 2018 – via Google Books.
- Churton, Edward (1838). The Assembled Commons or Parliamentary Biographer: 1838. p. 75. Retrieved 26 October 2018 – via Google Books.
- Stooks Smith, Henry. (1973) [1844-1850]. Craig, FWS (ed.). The Parliaments of England (2nd ed.). Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services. pp. 134–136. ISBN 0-900178-13-2.
- "South Eastern Gazette". 17 October 1854. p. 2. Retrieved 14 September 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- Love, Robert George (March 2016). "Policing and Police Reform in a Rural County; Somerset, c. 1830-1856" (PDF). Leicester Research Archive. University of Leicester. p. 47. Retrieved 8 April 2018.
- "Bath". Bell's Weekly Messenger. 10 July 1852. p. 3. Retrieved 8 April 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- Bartlett, Peter (1999). "1859 and its Aftermath". The Poor Law of Lunacy: The Administration of Pauper Lunatics in Mid-Nineteenth-Century England. London: Leicester University Press. p. 218. ISBN 0718501047. Retrieved 7 April 2018 – via Google Books.
- "Representation of Bath". Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette. 19 March 1857. pp. 3, 8. Retrieved 8 April 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- Godfrey (14 November 2019). "Statement of Persons Nominated" (PDF). Bath and North East Somerset Council. Retrieved 14 November 2019.
- "Bath parliamentary constituency - Election 2019". BBC News. Retrieved 13 December 2019.
- Moorcraft, Bethan (11 May 2017). "Who is Bath Liberal Democrat candidate Wera Hobhouse?". Bath Chronicle. Retrieved 2 November 2017.
- Petherick, Sam (19 April 2017). "Ben Howlett: 'Bath needs a champion now more than ever'".
- "BaNES Greens: all female line up for election challenge". Bath and NE Somerset Green Party.
- Petherick, Sam (3 May 2017). "Twerton councillor to represent Labour Party in general election". Bath Chronicle. Local World.
- "Bath parliamentary constituency - Election 2017". BBC News. Retrieved 9 June 2017.
- "Election Data 2015". Electoral Calculus. Archived from the original on 17 October 2015. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
- Bath Conservatives (2 November 2013). "Ben Howlett selected as Conservative Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for Bath". Archived from the original on 4 October 2014. Retrieved 19 January 2015.
- BathNES Liberal Democrats (May 2014). "Bath Lib Dems Select Steve Bradley for 2015". Archived from the original on 19 January 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2015.
- Western Daily Press (3 December 2013). "Bath Labour candidate Ollie Middleton could become youngest-ever MP". Archived from the original on 2 December 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2015.
- Bath Labour (18 February 2014). "Ollie Middleton selected as Bath Labour PPC". Archived from the original on 19 January 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2015.
- bath.greenparty.org.uk (11 March 2014). "Dominic Tristram Selected As PPC For Bath". Archived from the original on 19 January 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2015.
- Bath UKIP (25 February 2014). "Bath UKIP Selects Julian Deverell To Contest Bath Seat In 2015 Generel Election". Archived from the original on 19 January 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2015.
- Jaynes, Anita. "Independent bids to become first female MP for Bath". Excaliber. Retrieved 1 November 2016.
- James Crawley (29 January 2015). "Councillor Loraine Morgan-Brinkhurst to stand in General Election as independent MP candidate for Bath". Bath Chronicle. Local World. Archived from the original on 25 April 2015. Retrieved 30 January 2015.
- "Election Data 2010". Electoral Calculus. Archived from the original on 26 July 2013. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
- "Election 2010 – Bath". BBC News.
- "Election Data 2005". Electoral Calculus. Archived from the original on 15 October 2011. Retrieved 18 October 2015.
- "Election Data 2001". Electoral Calculus. Archived from the original on 15 October 2011. Retrieved 18 October 2015.
- "Election Data 1997". Electoral Calculus. Archived from the original on 15 October 2011. Retrieved 18 October 2015.
- "Election Data 1992". Electoral Calculus. Archived from the original on 15 October 2011. Retrieved 18 October 2015.
- "Politics Resources". Election 1992. Politics Resources. 9 April 1992. Archived from the original on 24 July 2011. Retrieved 6 December 2010.
- "Election Data 1987". Electoral Calculus. Archived from the original on 15 October 2011. Retrieved 18 October 2015.
- "Election Data 1983". Electoral Calculus. Archived from the original on 15 October 2011. Retrieved 18 October 2015.
- "1955 - Bath" – via Assembla.
- Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette, 6 May 1939
- 8 May 1937, Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette
- Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette, 26 February 1938
- Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette, 1 April 1939
- British parliamentary election results 1818–1949, Craig, FWS
- British parliamentary election results 1885–1918, Craig, FWS
- Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette, 2 May 1914
- Taunton Courier, and Western Advertiser, 21 Jan 1914
- Debrett's House of Commons & Judicial Bench, 1916
- The Liberal Year Book, 1907
- Craig, FWS, ed. (1974). British Parliamentary Election Results: 1885-1918. London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 9781349022984 – via Google Books.
- Debrett's House of Commons & Judicial Bench, 1901
- British Parliamentary Election Results, 1885–1918 FWS Craig
- "Political Items". Western Gazette. 11 July 1890. p. 2. Retrieved 21 November 2017.
- Craig, FWS, ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885 (e-book) (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 978-1-349-02349-3 – via Google Books.
- "The General Election". Leicester Chronicle. 3 April 1880. p. 8. Retrieved 23 November 2017.
- "Bath". North Devon Journal. 7 August 1873. p. 6. Retrieved 27 December 2017 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "To the electors of Bath". Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette. 2 October 1873. p. 5. Retrieved 27 December 2017 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Local Intelligence". Down Recorder. 11 October 1873. p. 2. Retrieved 27 December 2017 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Bath Election". Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette. 26 June 1873. p. 5. Retrieved 27 December 2017 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Bath and Berwickshire Elections". Derby Mercury. 2 July 1873. p. 5. Retrieved 27 December 2017 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Topics of the Week". Western Gazette. 26 September 1873. pp. 4–5. Retrieved 27 December 2017 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Testimonial to Mr Whateley". Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette. 21 June 1855. p. 3. Retrieved 8 April 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "The General Election". Bell's Weekly Messenger. 12 July 1852. p. 3. Retrieved 8 April 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Bath". Evening Mail. 2 July 1852. p. 4. Retrieved 8 April 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Bath Chronicle Office". Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette. 5 June 1851. p. 3. Retrieved 8 April 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "To the Electors of the City of Bath". Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette. 1 January 1835. p. 2. Retrieved 8 September 2019 – via British Newspaper Archive.
Sources
- "Parliamentary representation". Aspects of Somerset History. Archived from the original on 8 February 2005. Retrieved 26 April 2005.
- "Bath". Vote 2005. BBC News. Retrieved 26 April 2005.
- "Bath election history". Guardian Unlimited Politics. Archived from the original on 8 May 2005. Retrieved 26 April 2005.
- "Bath and North-East Somerset". Boundary Commission for England. 1 January 2001. Archived from the original on 12 March 2005. Retrieved 3 July 2005.
- "Constituencies in the unreformed House". Constituency start dates. Election Demon. Retrieved 3 July 2005.
- The BBC/ITN Guide to the New Parliamentary Constituencies (Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services, 1983)
- Robert Beatson (1807). A Chronological Register of Both Houses of Parliament. London: Longman, Hurst, Res & Orme – via Internet Archive.
Return of Members of Parliament.
- D Brunton & DH Pennington, Members of the Long Parliament (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1954)
- "Cobbett's Parliamentary history of England, from the Norman Conquest in 1066 to the year 1803". Thomas Hansard. London: Oxford Digital Library. 1808. Archived from the original on 4 September 2015.
- The Constitutional Year Book for 1913 (London: National Union of Conservative and Unionist Associations, 1913)
- FWS Craig, British Parliamentary Election Results 1832–1885 (2nd edition, Aldershot: Parliamentary Research Services, 1989)
- FWS Craig, British Parliamentary Election Results 1918–1949 (Glasgow: Political Reference Publications, 1969)
- Lewis Namier & John Brooke, The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1754–1790 (London: HMSO, 1964)
- THB Oldfield, The Representative History of Great Britain and Ireland (London: Baldwin, Cradock & Joy, 1816)
- Henry Pelling, Social Geography of British Elections 1885–1910 (London: Macmillan, 1967)
- J Holladay Philbin, Parliamentary Representation 1832 – England and Wales (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965)
- Edward Porritt and Annie G Porritt, The Unreformed House of Commons (Cambridge University Press, 1903)
- Colin Rallings & Michael Thrasher (eds), Media Guide to the New Parliamentary Constituencies (London: BBC/ITN/PA News/Sky, 1995)
- Robert Walcott, English Politics in the Early Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956)
- Robert Waller, The Almanac of British Politics (1st edition, London: Croom Helm, 1983)
- Frederic A Youngs, Jr, Guide to the Local Administrative Units of England, Vol I (London: Royal Historical Society, 1979)
External links
- Election 2005 - Bath BBC News, 23 May 2005
Parliament of the United Kingdom | ||
---|---|---|
Vacant since 1765 Title last held by Buckingham |
Constituency represented by the Prime Minister 30 July – 4 August 1766 |
Vacant until 1770 Title next held by Banbury |