Write-in candidate
A write-in candidate is a candidate whose name does not appear on the ballot but seeks election by asking voters to cast a vote for the candidate by literally writing in the person's name on the ballot. It is possible to win an election by winning a sufficient number of such write-in votes, which count equally to if the person was formally listed on the ballot.
Part of the Politics series | ||||||||
Balloting | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Electoral systems | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Voting strategies | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Voting patterns and effects | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Electoral fraud | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Politics portal | ||||||||
The system is almost totally confined to elections in the United States. Some U.S. states and local jurisdictions allow a voter to affix a sticker, with the write-in candidate's name, to the ballot in lieu of actually writing in the candidate's name. Write-in candidacies are sometimes a result of a candidate being legally or procedurally ineligible to run under their own name or party; write-in candidacies may be permitted where term limits bar an incumbent candidate from being officially nominated for, or being listed on the ballot for, re-election. In some cases, write-in campaigns have been organized to support a candidate who is not personally involved in running; this may be a form of draft campaign.
Write-in candidates rarely win, and sometimes write-in votes are cast for ineligible people or fictional characters. Some jurisdictions require write-in candidates be registered as official candidates before the election.[1] This is standard in elections with a large pool of potential candidates, as there may be multiple candidates with the same name that could be written in. In some cases, however, the number of write-in votes cast in an election is greater than the entire margin of victory, suggesting that the write-ins may have been sufficient to tip the balance and change the outcome of the election by creating a spoiler effect.[2]
Many U.S. states and municipalities allow for write-in votes in a partisan primary election where no candidate is listed on the ballot to have the same functional effect as nominating petitions: for example, if there are no Reform Party members on the ballot for state general assembly and a candidate receives more than 200 write-in votes when the primary election is held (or the other number of signatures that were required for ballot access), the candidate will be placed on the ballot on that ballot line for the general election. In most places, this provision is in place for non-partisan elections as well.
A write-in option may occasionally be available in a multiple-choice referendum; for example in the January 1982 Guamanian status referendum.
Contrast from a blank ballot election system
The term "write-in candidate" is used in elections in which names of candidates or parties are preprinted on a paper ballot or displayed on an electronic voting machine. The term is not generally used in elections in which all ballots are blank and thus all voters must write in the names of their preferred candidates. Blank ballot election systems reduce the cost of printing the ballots, but increase the complexity of casting and counting votes. Such systems are used in Japan,[3] and used in the past in the French Second Republic,[4] and in elections in the Philippines from World War 2 until the 2010 general election.[5] Blank-ballot systems typically require candidates to be nominated in advance.
United States
2020 Presidential General Election
This requirements to appear on the general election ballot as an independent or to have write-in votes counted varies by state.
Some states have no requirements for write-in candidates to be counted, some states will never count write-in candidates, but most states have specific criteria, which includes all write in candidates to register within their state by a certain date for the votes to be counted.The states with additional requirements also may have additional qualifications such as signatures required, additional paperwork, and fees.
State | Deadline to appear on ballot as Independent | Signatures required to appear on the ballot | Deadline for registration of write-in candidates (Additional paperwork and/or signatures may be required.) |
Source |
---|---|---|---|---|
ALABAMA | 08/13/20 | 5,000 | Always Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Alabama |
ALASKA | 08/05/20 | 3,212 | 10/29/20 (1) | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Alaska |
ARIZONA | 09/04/20 | 3% Registered Voters (Pending Final #) |
9/24/20 (2,7) | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Arizona |
ARKANSAS | 08/03/20 | 1,000 | Never Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Arkansas |
CALIFORNIA | 08/07/20 | 196,964 | 10/20/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_California |
COLORADO | 07/09/20 | 5,000 | 7/16/20 (3) | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Colorado |
CONNECTICUT | 08/07/20 | 5,250 | 10/20/20 (4) | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Connecticut |
DELAWARE | 09/01/20 | 7,141 | 9/30/20 | elections.delaware.gov/information/elections/general.shtml |
FLORIDA | 07/15/20 | 132,781 | 9/15/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Florida |
GEORGIA | 08/14/20 | 7,500 (Per 2016, Pending 2020) | 9/7/20 (5) | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Georgia |
HAWAII | 08/05/20 | 4,377 | Never Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Hawaii |
IDAHO | 08/25/20 | 1,000 | 10/6/20 (6) | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Idaho |
ILLINOIS | 07/20/20 | 25,000 (Pending Final #) |
9/3/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Illinois |
INDIANA | 06/30/20 | 44,935 | 7/3/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Indiana |
IOWA | 08/14/20 | 1,500 | Always Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Iowa |
KANSAS | 08/03/20 | 5,000 | 10/26/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Kansas |
KENTUCKY | 09/04/20 | 5,000 | 10/23/20 (2) | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Kentucky |
LOUISIANA | 08/21/20 | 5,000 | Never Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Louisiana |
MAINE | 06/01/20 | 4,000 | 9/19/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Maine |
MARYLAND | 08/03/20 | 10,000 | 10/28/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Maryland |
MASSACHUSETTS | 08/25/20 | 10,000 | 9/4/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Massachusetts |
MICHIGAN | 07/16/20 | 30,000 | 10/23/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Michigan
https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/2020_Elec-Dates-Booklet_ED-12_10-09-19_668275_7.pdf |
MINNESOTA | 08/18/20 | 2,000 | 10/27/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Minnesota |
MISSISSIPPI | 09/04/20 | 1,000 | Never Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Mississippi |
MISSOURI | 07/27/20 | 10,000 | 10/23/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Missouri |
MONTANA | 08/19/20 | 5,000 | 9/25/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Montana
https://sosmt.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020-Election-Calendar.pdf |
NEBRASKA | 08/01/20 | 2,500 | 10/23/20 (2) | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Nebraska |
NEVADA | 08/14/20 | 9,608 | Never Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Nevada |
NEW HAMPSHIRE | 09/02/20 | 3,000 | Always Allowed | ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_New_Hampshire |
NEW JERSEY | 08/27/20 | Pending | Always Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_New_Jersey |
NEW MEXICO | 06/25/20 | 16,251 | Never Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_New_Mexico |
NEW YORK | 07/30/20 | 45,000 | 10/13/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_New_York |
NORTH CAROLINA | 03/03/20 | 70,665 | 8/5/20 (8) | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_North_Carolina |
NORTH DAKOTA | 08/31/20 | 4,000 | 10/13/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_North_Dakota |
OHIO | 08/05/20 | 5,000 | 8/23/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Ohio |
OKLAHOMA | 07/15/20 | 35,592 | Never Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Oklahoma |
OREGON | 08/11/20 | 20,014 | Always Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Oregon |
PENNSYLVANIA | 08/03/20 | 5,000 | Always Allowed (9) | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Pennsylvania |
RHODE ISLAND | 07/10/20 | 1,000 | Always allowed (11) | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Rhode_Island |
SOUTH CAROLINA | 07/15/20 | 10,000 | Never Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_South_Carolina |
SOUTH DAKOTA | 08/04/20 | 3,392 | Never Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_South_Dakota |
TENNESSEE | 08/20/20 | 275 | 9/14/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Tennessee |
TEXAS | 05/11/20 | 89,693 | 8/17/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Texas |
UTAH | 08/17/20 | 1,000 | 9/4/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Utah |
VERMONT | 08/03/20 | 1,000 | Always Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Vermont |
VIRGINIA | 08/21/20 | 5,000 | 10/24/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Virginia |
WASHINGTON | 08/07/20 | 1,000 | 10/16/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Washington |
WEST VIRGINIA | 07/31/20 | 7,144 | 9/15/20 | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_West_Virginia |
WISCONSIN | 08/04/20 | 2,000 | 10/20/20 (10) | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Wisconsin |
WYOMING | 08/25/20 | 4,025 | Always Allowed | Ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Wyoming |
Notes
(1) Financial statements must be provided with Declaration of Intent.
(2) Candidates may not be considered if they ran and lost in the primary election or did not file enough signatures to be printed on the ballot.
(3) Candidates can alternately register via $1,000 fee by 8/5/20.
(4) Write-in candidates may not designate an affiliation with a political party, and nobody who was nominated by any party or by petition may run as a write-in candidate.
(5) Candidates must also file an affidavit affirming that the notice of intent was published in a "newspaper of general circulation in the state".
(6) The write-in candidate must receive at least 1,000 votes, file a declaration of candidacy and pay the requisite filing fee ($1,000) within 10 days of the primary election.
(7) Candidates may not be considered if they attempted but did not file enough signatures to be printed on the ballot.
(8) A write-in presidential candidate must file a declaration of intent and a petition containing the signatures of at least 500 voters.
(9) Stickered voting is not permitted.
(10) The write-in deadline may be extended to the Friday following the election if the write-in candidate "is eligible to receive the electoral votes" of the state.
(11) If candidate did not lose primary election.
Historical success of write-in candidates
Generally, write-in candidates can compete in any election within the United States. Typically, write-in candidates have a very small chance of winning, but there have been some strong showings by write-in candidates over the years.
Presidential primaries
- Herbert Hoover won the 1928 Republican presidential primary in Massachusetts on write-ins, polling 100,279.
- Franklin D. Roosevelt won the 1940 Democratic presidential primary in New Jersey with 34,278 write-ins.
- Thomas Dewey won the 1944 Republican presidential primary in Pennsylvania with 146,706 write-ins.
- Harold Stassen won the 1948 Republican presidential primary in Pennsylvania with 81,242 write-ins.
- Robert A. Taft won the 1952 Republican presidential primary in Nebraska with 79,357 write-ins, Estes Kefauver won the 1952 Democratic presidential primary in Pennsylvania with 93,160 write-ins and Dwight Eisenhower won the 1952 Republican presidential primary in Massachusetts with 254,898 write-ins.
- Dwight Eisenhower won the 1956 Republican presidential primary in Massachusetts with 51,951 write-ins.
- Richard Nixon won the 1960 Republican presidential primary in Massachusetts with 53,164 write-ins and John F. Kennedy won the Democratic Pennsylvania presidential primary with 183,073 write-ins along with the Democratic Massachusetts presidential primary with 91,607 write-ins.
- In the 1964 Republican presidential primary, a write-in campaign organized by supporters of former U.S. Senator and vice presidential nominee Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr. won Republican primaries for President in New Hampshire, New Jersey, and Massachusetts, defeating declared candidates Barry Goldwater, Nelson Rockefeller, and Margaret Chase Smith.
- In the 1968 Democratic presidential primary in New Hampshire, incumbent President Lyndon Johnson did not file, but received write-ins totaling 50% of all Democratic votes cast. Senator Eugene McCarthy, who campaigned actively against Johnson's Vietnam war policies, was on the ballot. He received an impressive 41% of the vote and gained more delegates than the President, who was reportedly "so stunned that he did not run for reelection".[6]
- In the 1992 Democratic presidential primary and the 1992 Republican presidential primary, consumer advocate Ralph Nader ran a write-in campaign during the New Hampshire primary for the presidential nomination of both parties. Declaring himself the "none of the above candidate" and using his Concord Principles as his platform, Nader received 3,054 votes from Democrats and 3,258 votes from Republicans.
Senate
- Republican William Knowland was elected in 1946 to the U.S. Senate from California, for a two-month term. The special election for the two-month term featured a November ballot with no names printed on it, and all candidates in that special election were write-in candidates.[7]
- Democrat Strom Thurmond was elected in 1954 to the United States Senate in South Carolina as a write-in candidate, after state Democratic leaders had blocked him from receiving the party's nomination.[7]
- In 2010 incumbent Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski lost the Republican primary to Joe Miller.[8] Following her defeat she ran in the general election as a write-in candidate. Murkowski had filed, and won, a lawsuit requiring election officials to have the list of names of write-in candidates distributed at the polls,[9] and subsequently won the election with a wide enough margin over both Miller, and Democratic Party candidate Scott T. McAdams, to make moot the write-in ballots that had been challenged by Miller.[10]
House of Representatives
- In 1918, Peter F. Tague was elected to the U.S. House as a write-in independent Democrat, defeating the Democratic nominee, John F. Fitzgerald.
- In 1930 Republican Charles F. Curry, Jr. was elected to the House as a write-in from Sacramento, California. His father, Congressman Charles F. Curry Sr., would have been listed on the ballot unopposed but, due to his untimely death, his name was removed and no candidate's name was listed on the ballot.
- In 1958, Democrat Dale Alford was elected as a write-in candidate to the United States House of Representatives in Arkansas. As member of the Little Rock school board, Alford launched his write-in campaign a week before the election because the incumbent, Brooks Hays, was involved in the incident in which president Eisenhower sent federal troops to enforce racial integration at Little Rock Central High School. Racial integration was unpopular at the time, and Alford won by approximately 1,200 votes, a 2% margin.[11]
- In 1964 Democrat Gale Schisler was nominated for Congress in Illinois as a write-in candidate when no Democrat filed to run in the primary election. He defeated incumbent Robert McLoskey in the November General Election.
- In November 1980, Republican Joe Skeen was elected to Congress in New Mexico as a write-in candidate, because of a spoiler candidate who also happened to be a write-in. No Republican had filed to run against the incumbent Democrat, Harold L. Runnels, before the close of filing. Runnels died on August 5, 1980, and the Democrats requested a special primary to pick a replacement candidate. The New Mexico Secretary of State allowed the Democrats to have a special primary, but did not allow the Republicans to have a special primary, because they had already gone with no candidate. So Skeen ran as a write-in candidate. After Runnels' widow lost the Democratic special primary, she launched her own write-in candidacy, which split the Democratic vote, taking enough votes from the Democratic nominee to give the election to the Republican, Skeen, who won with a 38% plurality.[11]
- Ron Packard of California finished in second place in the 18-candidate Republican primary to replace the retiring Clair Burgener. Packard lost the primary by 92 votes in 1982, and then mounted a write-in campaign as an independent. He won the election with a 37% plurality against both a Republican and a Democratic candidate. Following the elections, he re-aligned himself as a Republican.[11]
- Democrat Charlie Wilson was the endorsed candidate of the Democratic Party for Ohio's 6th congressional district in Ohio to replace Ted Strickland in 2006. Strickland was running for Governor, and had to give up his congressional seat. Wilson, though, did not qualify for the ballot because only 46 of the 96 signatures on his candidacy petition were deemed valid, while 50 valid signatures were required for ballot placement. The Democratic Party continued to support Wilson, and an expensive primary campaign ensued – over $1 million was spent by both parties. Wilson overwhelmingly won the Democratic primary as a write-in candidate on May 2, 2006 against two Democratic candidates whose names were on the ballot, with Wilson collecting 44,367 votes, 67% of the Democratic votes cast.[12] Wilson faced Republican Chuck Blasdel in the general election on November 7, 2006, and won, receiving 61% of the votes.
- Democrat Dave Loebsack entered the 2006 Democratic primary in Iowa's second congressional district as a write-in candidate after failing to get the required number of signatures. He won the primary and in the general election he defeated 15-term incumbent Jim Leach by a 51% to 49% margin.
- Jerry McNerney ran as a write-in candidate in the March 2004 Democratic Primary in California's 11th congressional district. He received 1,667 votes (3% of the votes cast), and, having no opposition (no candidates were listed on the Democratic primary ballot), won the primary.[13] Although he lost the November 2004 general election to Republican Richard Pombo, McNerney ran again in 2006 (as a candidate listed on the ballot) and won the Democratic Primary in June, and then the rematch against Pombo in November.
- Shelley Sekula-Gibbs failed as a write-in candidate in the November 7, 2006 election to represent the 22nd Texas congressional district in the 110th Congress (for the full term commencing January 3, 2007). The seat had been vacant since June 9, 2006, due to the resignation of the then representative Tom DeLay. Therefore, on the same ballot, there were two races: one for the 110th Congress, as well as a race for the unexpired portion of the term during the 109th Congress (until January 3, 2007). Sekula-Gibbs won the race for the unexpired portion of the term during the 109th Congress as a candidate listed on the ballot. She could not be listed on the ballot for the full term because Texas law did not allow a replacement candidate to be listed on the ballot after the winner of the primary (Tom DeLay) has resigned.
- Peter Welch, a Democrat representing Vermont's sole congressional district, became both the Democratic and Republican nominee for the House when he ran for re-election in 2008 and 2016. Because the Republicans did not field any candidate on the primary ballot in those elections, Welch won enough write-in votes to win the Republican nomination.[14]
State legislatures
- Several members of the Alaska House of Representatives were elected as write-in candidates during the 1960s and 1970s, particularly from rural districts in the northern and western portions of the state. Factors in play at the time include the newness of Alaska as a state and the previous absence of electoral politics in many of the rural communities, creating an environment which made it hard to attract candidates to file for office during the official filing period. Most of the areas in question were largely populated by Alaska natives, who held little political power in Alaska at the time. This only began to change following the formation of the Alaska Federation of Natives and the passage of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. Known examples of successful write-in candidates include Kenneth A. Garrison and Father Segundo Llorente (1960), Frank R. Ferguson (1972), James H. "Jimmy" Huntington (1974), and Nels A. Anderson, Jr. (1976). The incumbent in Llorente's election, Axel C. Johnson, ran for re-election as a write-in candidate after failing to formally file his candidacy paperwork. Johnson and Llorente, as write-in candidates, both outpolled the one candidate who did appear on the ballot. Ferguson and Anderson were both incumbents who launched their write-in campaigns after being defeated in the primary election. Anderson's main opponent, Joseph McGill, had himself won election to the House in 1970 against a write-in candidate by only 5 votes.
- Carl Hawkinson of Galesburg, Illinois won the Republican primary for the Illinois Senate from Illinois's 47th District in 1986 as a write-in candidate. He went on to be elected in the general election and served until 2003. Hawkinson defeated another write-in, David Leitch, in the primary. Incumbent State Senator Prescott Bloom died in a home fire after the filing date for the primary had passed.
- Arizona state senator Don Shooter won the 2010 primary as a write-in and went on to win the general election.
- After failing to receive the Republican Party's 1990 Wilson Pakula nomination, incumbent and registered Conservative New York State Senator Serphin Maltese won the party's nomination as a write-in candidate.[15]
- Charlotte Burks won as a Democratic write-in candidate for the Tennessee Senate seat left vacant when the incumbent, her husband Tommy, was assassinated by his opponent, Byron Looper, two weeks before the elections of November 2, 1998. The assassin was the only name on the ballot, so Charlotte ran as a write-in candidate.
- Winnie Brinks was elected to the Michigan House of Representatives in 2012 after a series of unusual events. In May of that year, State Representative Roy Schmidt – who had previously filed to run for re-election as a Democrat – withdrew from the Democratic primary and re-filed as a Republican. A friend of Schmidt's nephew filed to run as a Democrat, but withdrew two days later amid anger among local Democrats. This left Democrats without a candidate. Brinks ran as a write-in to be the Democratic nominee. She won the primary and was listed on the ballot in the general election, which she also won. Coincidentally, the general election also saw a write-in candidate, Bing Goei, receive significant support.[16]
- Scott Wagner was elected as an anti-establishment Republican write-in candidate to the Pennsylvania Senate in a March 2014 special election over endorsed Republican nominee Ron Miller and Democrat Linda Small.[17]
- Nick Freitas was re-elected as a write-in candidate after missing a filing deadline to appear on the ballot in the Virginia House of Delegates.[18][19]
Local government
- Angela Allen was elected Mayor of Tar Heel, North Carolina (population 115) as a write-in candidate in 2003.[20]
- Julia Allen of Readington, New Jersey won a write-in campaign in the November 2005 elections for the Township Committee,[21] after a candidate accused of corruption had won the primary.[22]
- Tom Ammiano, President of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, entered the race for Mayor of San Francisco as a write-in candidate two weeks before the 1999 general election. He received 25% of the vote, coming in second place and forcing incumbent Mayor Willie Brown into a runoff election, which Brown won by margin of 59% to 40%. In 2001, the campaign was immortalized in the award-winning documentary film See How They Run.
- John R. Brinkley ran as a write-in candidate for governor of Kansas in 1930. He was motivated at least in part by the state's revocation of his medical license and attempts to shut down his clinic, where he performed alternative medical procedures including transplantation of goat glands into humans. He won 29.5% of the vote in a three-way race. Brinkley's medical and political career are documented in Pope Brock's book Charlatan.[23]
- Mike Duggan filed petition to run for mayor of Detroit in 2013; however, following a court challenge, Duggan's name was removed from the ballot. Duggan then campaigned as a write-in in the August 2013 primary, with the intent of being one of the top two vote-getters and thus advancing to the general election in November. Duggan received the highest number of votes in the primary, and advanced to the runoff in November. He eventually defeated challenger Sheriff Benny Napoleon and became the Mayor of Detroit.[24]
- Donna Frye ran as a write-in candidate for Mayor of San Diego in 2004. A controversy erupted when several thousand votes for her were not counted because the voters had failed to fill in the bubble next to the write-in line. Had those votes been counted, she would have won the election.[25]
- Michael Jarjura was re-elected Mayor of Waterbury, Connecticut in 2005 as a write-in candidate after losing the Democratic party primary to Karen Mulcahy, who used to serve as Waterbury's tax collector before Jarjura fired her in 2004 "for what he claimed was her rude and abusive conduct toward citizens".[26] After spending $100,000 on a general elections write-in campaign,[27] Jarjura received 7,907 votes, enough for a plurality of 39%.[28]
- James Maher won the mayorship of Baxter Estates, New York on March 15, 2005 as a write-in candidate with 29 votes. Being the only one on the ballot, the incumbent mayor, James Neville, did not campaign, as he did not realize that there was a write-in campaign going on. Neville received only 13 votes.[29]
- Beverly O'Neil won a third term as Mayor of Long Beach, California as a write-in candidate in 2002. The Long Beach City City Charter has a term limit amendment that says a candidate cannot be on the ballot after two full terms, but does not prevent the person from running as a write-in candidate.[30] She finished first in a seven-candidate primary, but did not receive more than 50% of the vote, forcing a runoff contest. In the runoff, still restricted from the ballot, she got roughly 47% of the vote in a three-way election that included a second write-in candidate.[31]
- Michael Sessions, an 18-year-old high school senior, won as a write-in candidate for Mayor of Hillsdale, Michigan in 2005. He was too young to qualify for the ballot.
- In Galesburg, Illinois, an error by the Galesburg Election Commission[32] in late 2010 gave city council candidate Chuck Reynolds the wrong number of signatures he required to be on the ballot for the April 2011 city council election,[33] resulting in him being removed from the ballot when challenged by Incumbent Russell Fleming.[32][34] Reynolds ran as a write-in vote[35] in the April 2011 election, and lost by 9 votes.[36][37]
- Anthony A. Williams, then incumbent Mayor of Washington, D.C. was forced to run as a write-in candidate in the 2002 Democratic primary, because he had too many invalid signatures for his petition. He won the Democratic primary, and went on to win re-election.
- In the November 8, 2011, election for Commonwealth's Attorney of Richmond County, Virginia, 16-year incumbent Wayne Emery has been certified the winner as a write-in candidate over challenger James Monroe by a margin of 53 votes (2.4%) out of 2,230 votes cast, after his petitions were challenged and his name was removed from the ballot.[38]
- In the August 4, 2020, Primary Election of Ypsilanti Township, Michigan Monica Ross-Williams, a then Ypsilanti Township Trustee[39]received 3,478 Write-In Votes for Ypsilanti Township Clerk, for the highest number of Write-In Votes in any election in Washtenaw County, Michigan history.[40]
- In the 1997 election for Mayor of Talkeetna, Alaska, Stubbs the Cat won over the two human candidates. He was re-elected every mayoral election thereafter, and served until his death on July 2, 2017.[41][42]
- Eau Claire County, Wisconsin sheriff Ron Cramer,[43] formerly a sheriff's deputy, won election as Eau Claire County's 47th sheriff, defeating disgraced 10-year incumbent sheriff Richard M. Hewitt (d. 2008)[44] in a write-in campaign hastily organized just weeks before the election in 1996. He has handily won reelection every 4 years since, usually running unopposed.[45]
- Lynda Neuwirth defeated the lone candidate on the ballot, Joseph DiPasquale, for the Ellicottville, New York village justice position on March 19, 2019; Neuwirth received three votes to DiPasquale's two.[46] Neuwirth was ousted after only two months in the position, as voters had approved a referendum abolishing the court the previous November; when the abolition was delayed two months, Neuwirth was not allowed to retain her seat and was replaced by a justice from the surrounding township, which will absorb the village court's jurisdiction.[47]
Others
- Aaron Schock was elected to the District 150 School Board in Peoria, Illinois in 2001 by a write-in vote, after his petitions were challenged and his name was removed from the ballot. He defeated the incumbent by over 2,000 votes, approximately 6,400 to 4,300 votes.[48] He went on to serve in the Illinois House of Representatives, and was elected to the United States House of Representatives in 2008. He was later forced to resign in an expenses scandal.[49]
- John Adams became an Orange County, California judge in November 2002 after running along with 10 other write-in candidates in the primaries on March 5, 2002 against incumbent Judge Ronald Kline.[50] After the filing deadline in which no candidate filed to run against Kline, a computer hacker discovered that Judge Kline had child pornography on his home computer. Kline got less than 50% of the vote in the primaries, requiring a runoff between him and write-in candidate John Adams (who actually received more votes than Kline).[51] After some legal maneuvers, Kline's name was removed from the general elections, leaving the general election a runoff between Adams and Gay Sandoval, who was the second highest write-in vote getter.[52] Charges against Kline were eventually thrown out.[53]
- On September 15, 2009, four write-in candidates in the Independence Party primaries for various offices in Putnam County, New York defeated their on-ballot opponents.[54]
- In a May 2011 school board election for the Bentley School Board in Michigan, Lisa Osborn ran as a write-in candidate and needed just one vote to win a seat. However, she did not receive any votes, even from herself. She explained herself by saying that she was at her son's baseball game and did not have time to go to the polls.[55]
California's Proposition 14 impact on write-in candidates
In 2010, California voters passed Proposition 14 which set up a new election system for the United States Senate, United States House of Representatives, all statewide offices (governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, state treasurer, state controller, attorney general, insurance commissioner, and superintendent of public instruction), California Board of Equalization, and for the California State Legislature. In the system set up by Proposition 14, there are two rounds of voting, and the top two vote-getters for each race in the first round (the primary, held in June 2004 – 2018 and March 2020-present) advance to a second round (the general election, held in November). Proposition 14 specifically prohibits write-in candidates in the second round, and this prohibition was upheld in a court challenge.[56] Another court challenge to the prohibition on write-in candidates in the second round was filed in July 2014.[57]
Although Proposition 14 prohibits write-in candidates in the second round of voting, it has made it easier for write-in candidates in the first round to advance to the second round. This generally happens in elections where only one candidate is listed on the ballot. Since in each race the top two vote-getters from the first round are guaranteed to advance to the second round, if only one candidate is listed on the ballot, a write-in candidate can easily advance to the second round, as the write-in candidate would only have to compete with other write-in candidates for the 2nd spot, not with any listed candidates. In some jungle primary systems, if the winner in the first round wins by more than 50% of the vote, then the second (runoff) round gets cancelled, but in the system set up by Proposition 14, a second (runoff) round is required regardless of the percent of the vote that the winner of the first round received. Proposition 14 therefore guarantees that if only one candidate is listed on the ballot in the first round, a write-in candidate running against the one listed candidate can earn a spot for the second round with as little as one vote.[n 1]
The first election in which Proposition 14 went into effect was the 2012 elections.
California elections in which primary election write in candidates advanced to the general election | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Number of write-in candidates who successfully made it to the November general election | Offices for which write-in candidates successfully made it to the November general election | General election results for candidates who qualified as write-in candidates in the primaries | Links to election results | ||||
Wins | Max | Average | Min | Primary (March/June) | General (November) | |||
2012 | 5 | SD3, SD9, SD33, AD15, AD31 | 0 | 36.0% | 23.4% | 13.2% | [58] | [59] |
2014 | 16[60] | CD23, CD44, BOE3, SD16, SD22, SD36, AD5, AD14, AD21, AD31, AD41, AD51, AD60, AD67, AD75, AD76 | 0 | 46.6% | 31.3% | 13.3% | [61] | [62] |
2016 | 15[n 2] | CD14, SD33, AD1, AD2, AD7, AD32, AD46, AD49, AD51, AD58, AD62, AD70, AD73, AD76 | 0 | 43.9% | 28.5% [n 3] |
13.9% [n 3] |
[63] | [64] |
2018 | 12 | CD13, CD19, CD32, AD4, AD7, AD20, AD21, AD27, AD51, AD61, AD64, AD69 | 0 | 32.6% | 23.6% | 11.6% | [65] | [66] |
2020 | 11 | SD3, SD9, SD25, SD31, SD33, SD39, AD7, AD11, AD17, AD21, AD45 | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | [67] | TBD |
Another impact of Proposition 14 on write-in candidates is that since the passage of Proposition 14, candidates who are not affiliated with any party can be listed on the ballot for election to offices affected by Proposition 14. Prior to passage of Proposition 14, candidates who were not affiliated with any party, could not run in any party primaries, and were required to run in the general election as write-in candidates.
Other countries
With a few exceptions, the practice of recognizing write-in candidates is typically viewed internationally as an American tradition.[68][69]
- A bizarre incident involving a fictitious write-in candidacy occurred in the small town of Picoazá, Ecuador in 1967. A company ran a series of campaign-themed advertisements for a foot powder called Pulvapies. Some of the slogans used included "Vote for any candidate, but if you want well-being and hygiene, vote for Pulvapies", and "For Mayor: Honorable Pulvapies". The foot powder Pulvapies ended up receiving the most votes in the election.[70][71][72]
- In Brazil, until the introduction of electronic voting in 1994, the ballot had no names written for legislative candidates, so many voters would protest by voting on fictional characters or religious figures. In a famous case, the São Paulo city zoo rhinoceros Cacareco got around 100,000 votes in the 1959 elections for the municipal council, more than any candidate.[73] However, those votes were not considered because Brazilian law stipulates that a candidate must be affiliated to a political party to take office.
- Until 2013,[74] write-in candidates were permitted at municipal elections in France for councils of communes with a population of less than 2500.[75]
- Elections in Sweden are open list, with voters placing into the ballot box an envelope containing their choice of either a ballot preprinted with the name of a registered party or else a blank ballot on which they write the name of a party (registered or unregistered) and optionally that of a candidate.[76][77] A person must consent to being a candidate listed on a preprinted ballot, but there was no such obligation for write-in names until the 2018 general election.[76][78] In the 2006 municipal elections, the Sweden Democrats (SD) won seats on several councils where they had no nominee or preprinted ballots; most SD voters wrote the party name but no candidate name. The seats were filled by the name most often written, if any, and left empty if no voter wrote in a name. One example was Vårgårda Municipality, where only three of 143 SD voters wrote in names, of which two were for an ineligible non-resident; the winner resigned his seat as he opposed the SD and his sole vote was cast by his father as a joke.[79] In 2010 one Jimmy Åkesson was elected to Staffanstorp Municipality council after a single SD voter wrote his name. The voter apparently intended SD leader Jimmie Åkesson, not resident in Staffanstorp.[80]
- In elections in Austria, writing on a ballot paper does not invalidate a vote provided the voter's preference is clear. In the 1990 legislative election the unpopular SPÖ, worried that voters would not select it on the party-list ballot, advised them to write in the name of Franz Vranitzky, its popular leader. Such ballots would be interpreted as SPÖ votes.[81]
Protest
- Mad magazine satirically called to vote for Alfred E. Neuman as a write-in candidate for every U.S. presidential election from 1960 to 1980 with slogans like "You could do worse–and you already have" and "There are Bigger Idiots running for office!".
- In the 1980 U.S. Presidential election, guitarist Joe Walsh ran a mock write-in campaign, promising to make his song "Life's Been Good" the new national anthem if he won, and running on a platform of "Free Gas for Everyone." Though Walsh (then aged 33) was not old enough to actually assume the office, he wanted to raise public awareness of the election. (In 1992, Walsh purportedly ran for vice-president, in his song "Vote For Me", a track on his album Songs for a Dying Planet, which was released that year.)
- During the 2000 United States Congress Elections, film-maker Michael Moore led a campaign for voters to submit a ficus tree as a write-in candidate. This campaign was replicated across the country and was recounted in an episode of The Awful Truth.
- In 2012, a campaign was waged to write in Charles Darwin against Georgia congressman Paul Broun (who was running unopposed) after Broun "called evolution and other areas of science 'lies straight from the pit of hell.' " Darwin received approximately 4,000 votes.[82] However, because Darwin was not registered as an official candidate (some states require even write-ins to be pre-registered), the Georgia Secretary of State did not tabulate those votes.[83]
- In 2016, several grassroots campaigns to elect Bernie Sanders President as a write-in candidate were established on social media in the run-up to the United States presidential election. Though Sanders continued to campaign for Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton, supporters pointed to alleged DNC bias in the Democratic Party's presidential primaries against Sanders, and Clinton's email scandal, and continued to support him.[84] Both Clinton and Donald Trump would have had to win less than the required 270 electoral college votes for Sanders to have denied either candidate the presidency, and for the election to be passed to the House of Representatives – thus the initial write-in campaign around Vermont, offering only three college votes, was not successful, but Sanders did receive almost six percent of the vote there.[85] The campaign expanded to include all 12 eligible states (one of which listed Sanders as an official write-in candidate), and relied on states such as California, with a high electoral college vote count and large support for Sanders, to be successful in denying both Trump and Clinton.[86]
- In Sweden, all handwritten votes are scanned by computer and the results published online, although only votes for valid parties count towards determining successful candidates. In the 2010 general election, ineffective votes included 120 for Donald Duck and 2 for "myself",[87] as well as several computer code snippets apparently intended as code injection attacks aimed at either the program which tallied the votes or the browsers of users who accessed the results website.[88]
- In the 2018 Egyptian presidential election, owing to a large number of candidates being arrested or barred from running, Egyptian football star Mohamed Salah received over a million votes, as many Egyptians cancelled out the names of both candidates and wrote his instead. This was higher than the number of votes received by the second place candidate, Moussa Mostafa Moussa. Write-in votes are not deemed valid in Egypt.
See also
- None of the above
- None of these candidates - Nevada's implementation of the "None of the above" voting option
Notes
- In the June 2012 election, a write-in candidate running in the 33rd Senate District won a spot in the runoff race with as few as 3 votes. See official election results
- In AD62, two write-in candidates received an equal number of votes (32), and tied for second place against the first-place finisher, incumbent Autumn Burke. Therefore, the two write-in candidates advanced to the general election within one race (see the Los Angeles Times story dated July 11, 2016 Write-in legislative candidates win spots on the November ballot, in some cases with only a handful of votes by John Myers)
- Data is for the 14 distinct races in which the results for the two write in candidates who advanced in AD62, one of whom received 17.2% and the other received 5.6%, are summed up to 22.8%. When treating the two candidates in AD62 as distinct candidates and averaging over 15 candidates, the average goes down to 26.6% and the min (obviously) drops to 5.6%
References
- See, for example, Section 1-4-1101, Colorado Revised Statutes (2008)
- https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/dec/30/alabama-election-roy-moore-write-in-votes
- Cox, Karen E.; Schoppa, Leonard J. (2016). "Interaction Effects in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems". Comparative Political Studies. 35 (9): 1027–1053 : 1038. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.555.9675. doi:10.1177/001041402237505. ISSN 0010-4140.
Japanese voters receive a blank ballot paper and are instructed to write down the name of an SMD candidate after examining a sheet posted on the wall of their voting booth. This list gives the names of all candidates along with the names of the party that submitted the candidate’s name.
- Schaffer, Frederic Charles (2008). The Hidden Costs of Clean Election Reform. Cornell University Press. pp. 49, fn. 32. ISBN 9780801441158. Retrieved 11 May 2018.
- Schaffer, Frederic Charles (2016). "Might Cleaning Up Elections Keep People Away from the Polls? Historical and Comparative Perspectives" (PDF). International Political Science Review. 23 (1): 69–84 : 76–77. doi:10.1177/0192512102023001004. ISSN 0192-5121.
- "NH.gov – New Hampshire Almanac – First-in-the-Nation – Highlights". Retrieved April 15, 2016.
Johnson was so stunned that he did not run for reelection.
- Washington Post, "Murkowski appears to make history in Alaska", Debbi Wilgoren, November 3, 2010 (accessed November 3, 2010)
- Official election results for the 2010 primaries. Alaska Division of Elections.
- Joling, Dan (October 28, 2010). "Lisa Murkowski Can Appear On List Of Write-In Candidates, State Supreme Court Rules". Huffington Post.
- Bohrer, Becky (November 18, 2010). "Murkowski becomes 1st write-in senator since '54". Boston Globe. Associated Press.
- Ken Rudin (August 23, 2006). "What Happens If Lieberman Wins". National Public Radio. Retrieved 2006-09-03.
- Johnson, Alan (May 3, 2006). "Wilson wins primary as write-in candidate". The Columbus Dispatch. Retrieved 2006-06-30.
- "Election Results for the March 2004 Primary" (PDF). California Secretary of State.
- Caygle, Heather (October 7, 2016). "Sanders-loving Vermont lawmaker snags GOP nomination". Politico.
- "Serphin R. Maltese R-C;". Retrieved April 15, 2016.
- "Winnie Brinks takes oath of office as Michigan's 76th District State Representative". MLive.com. Retrieved April 15, 2016.
- Murphy, Jan (March 18, 2014). "Scott Wagner makes history with his win in York County Senate race". PennLive.com. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
- STAR-EXPONENT, ALLISON BROPHY CHAMPION CULPEPER. "Freitas write-in campaign focused on winning, supporting other GOP candidates". Fredericksburg.com. Archived from the original on 2019-10-11. Retrieved 2019-10-18.
- Brophy Chapmpion, Allison (Nov 9, 2019). "Abundant spelling variations as Culpeper certifies 5,205 write-in votes for Nick Freitas". Culpeper Star-Exponent.
- Henderson, Greg Barnes and MarCharia. "Small town has charm of its own".
- "2005 General Election results for Hunterdon County".
- "Reprint from The Huntington County News" (PDF).
- https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/books/31maslin.html?_r=0 Fleecing the Sheep, Who Keep Coming Back for More
- Abbeylambertz, Kate (August 7, 2013). "Mike Duggan, Write-In Candidate, Pulls Comeback In Detroit Mayoral Primary". Huffington Post.
- Rainey, James (December 25, 2004). "Media's role clouds San Diego recount". The Boston Globe.
- "Waterbury mayor to wage write-in campaign".
- "The Waterbury Observer – The Write Stuff".
- News Channel 8 / 2005 Vote Election Results
- Kazanjian O'Brien, Dolores (April 1, 2005). "Baxter Estates Mayor James Neville "Stunned" by Write-in Defeat". Port Washington News. Retrieved 2006-06-30.
- Darius Tajanko. "City of Long Beach – File #: 07-0089". Retrieved April 15, 2016.
- Legacy of a Legend. Long Beach Press-Telegram.
- http://www.wgil.com/newsarchive.php?xnewsaction=fullnews&newsarch=012011&newsid=150
- http://www.galesburg.com/news/x1958454815/Election-commission-upholds-challenge
- http://www.galesburg.com/news/x703876634/Election-commission-delays-announcement
- http://www.galesburg.com/news/x1254713692/Reynolds-will-run-as-write-in-for-city-council-Ward-3
- ERIC TIMMONS. "Recount for Galesburg City Council Ward 3 seat possible". The Register-Mail. Retrieved April 15, 2016.
- http://www.galesburg.com/news/x528727041/Final-count-confirms-Fleming-s-victory-for-Ward-3-council-seat
- http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2011/nov/10/tdmet03-richmond-county-write-in-campaign-workedma-ar-1448412
- Rigg, Sarah (March 20, 2019). "West Willow neighborhood committee tackles traffic safety issues near American Center for Mobility". Concentrate.
- "Washtenaw County Government AUGUST 4, 2020 STATE PRIMARY ELECTION". Washtenaw County Government. August 4, 2020.
- Friedman, Amy (July 17, 2012). "Cat Marks 15 Years as Mayor of Alaska Town". Time Magazine.
- "Feline sad: cat who was 'mayor' of Alaskan town for 20 years dies". The Guardian. July 23, 2017.
- "Sheriff - Eau Claire County". www.co.eau-claire.wi.us.
- https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/43533504/richard-malcolm-hewitt
- O’Brien, Christena T. (May 8, 2018). "Cramer in the running again for Eau Claire County sheriff". Eau Claire Leader-Telegram.
- Paulsen, Andy (March 19, 2019). "Write-in Candidate Wins By One Vote in Ellicottville". WESB. Retrieved March 19, 2019.
- "As Ellicottville Village Court is dissolved, town courts will add to judicial duties". Olean Times Herald. July 23, 2019. Retrieved July 23, 2019.
- "School Board Write-in Campaign".
- DeBonis, Mike (March 17, 2015). "Rep. Aaron Schock announces resignation in wake of spending probe". Washington Post. Retrieved March 18, 2015.
- "'Fight' seen in California's governor's race". CNN. March 6, 2002. Archived from the original on January 23, 2009. Retrieved 2006-03-30.
- "Orange County Registrar of Voters Election Results for March 5, 2002".
- "Orange County Registrar of Voters Election Results for November 5, 2002".
- Srisavasdi, Rachanee (October 30, 2003). "Case against ex-judge Kline gutted". Irvine World News. Retrieved 2006-06-30.
- Dougherty, Michael Brendan (October 1, 2009). "A Reversal of Fortune for Interim Independence Party". The Putnam County Courier. Retrieved November 27, 2009.
- Acosta, Roberto. "School board candidate loses election because she didn't vote for herself; calls not voting a 'dumb move'". Mlive.com. Retrieved November 2, 2011.
- Hagan Cain, Robyn (Sep 21, 2011). "Court Upholds Prop 14 Bans on Write-In Votes, Unqualified Parties".
- Cadelago, Christopher (Jul 30, 2014). "Lawsuit challenges write-in rules under California's top-two system". Sacramento Bee.
- "Presidential Primary Election – Statement of Vote, June 5, 2012 – California Secretary of State".
- "General Election – Statement of Vote, November 6, 2012 – California Secretary of State".
- Merl, Jean (July 22, 2014). "Some June write-in candidates made it to the November ballot". Los Angeles Times.
- "Statewide Direct Primary Election – Statement of Vote, June 3, 2014 – California Secretary of State".
- "General Election – Statement of Vote – November 4, 2014 – California Secretary of State".
- California Secretary of State results for the June 2016 primary statewide elections
- "California Secretary of State results for the November 2016 general statewide elections" (PDF).
- California Secretary of State results for the June 2018 primary statewide elections
- California Secretary of State results for the November 2018 general statewide elections
- California Secretary of State results for the March 2020 primary statewide elections
- ABC News. "Donald Duck's a Big Bird in Politics". ABC News. Retrieved April 15, 2016.
- "Livingstone threatens write-in campaign". BBC News. November 11, 1998.
- "Foot Powder Produces Headaches in Ecuador." The New York Times. July 18, 1967. Page 39. Retrieved December 19, 2009.
- David Mikkelson (December 10, 2009). "Foot Powder Ecuador Election Result". snopes. Retrieved April 15, 2016.
- "Foot Powder Wins Election Hands Down." The Washington Post. July 18, 1967 (p. A13).
- Ferreira, Neil. "Cacareco agora é Excelência". O Cruzeiro. Retrieved 20 October 2012.
- P.-YC (22 March 2014). "Élections municipales : tout ce que vous devez savoir avant d'aller dans l'isoloir". SudOuest.fr (in French). Retrieved 6 April 2018.
La loi du 17 mai 2013 a instauré plusieurs changements dans le scrutin municipal ... Dans les communes de plus de 1000 habitants ... il y a désormais interdiction de voter pour un candidat non déclaré. ...[D]ans une commune de moins de 1000 habitants, ... il est désormais interdit de voter pour une personne qui n’est pas candidate.
- "Peut-on voter pour quelqu'un qui n'est pas candidat ?". Le Parisien (in French). 29 February 2008. Retrieved 6 April 2018.
- "Elections Act 157:1997" (PDF). Regeringskansliet. Chapter 6, sections 3 and 5, Chapter 9, section 12, Chapter 16, section 2, No.3. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
- Nardelli, Alberto (11 September 2014). "Swedish elections 2014: seven point guide to the key facts". TheGuardian.com. Retrieved 5 May 2018.; "The examination of ballot papers -". Valmyndigheten. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
- Wikström, Douglas; Barrat, Jordi; Heiberg, Sven; Krimmer, Robert; Schürmann, Carsten (2017). Krimmer, Robert; Volkamer, Melanie; Binder, Nadja Braun; Kersting, Norbert; Pereira, Olivier; Schürmann, Carsten (eds.). How Could Snowden Attack an Election?. Electronic Voting: Second International Joint Conference, E-Vote-ID 2017, Bregenz, Austria, October 24–27, 2017, Proceedings. LNCS (Lecture notes in computer science). 10615. Springer. pp. 280–291 : 290. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68687-5_17. ISBN 9783319686875. ISSN 0302-9743. Retrieved 8 May 2018.
- "Sverigedemokrat i Vårgårda tvekar". Sveriges Radio (in Swedish). September 27, 2006. Retrieved January 15, 2019.; O'Mahony, Paul (28 September 2006). "Dad's practical joke turns trucker into politician". The Local. Retrieved 15 January 2019.
- Adolfsson, Viktor (25 October 2012). "Jimmy Åkesson kan tvingas representera SD". Nyheter24 (in Swedish). Retrieved 5 May 2018.
- Höbelt, Lothar (2003). Defiant Populist: Jörg Haider and the Politics of Austria. Purdue University Press. p. 68. ISBN 9781557532305. Retrieved 11 May 2018.
- Thompson, Jim (November 9, 2012). "Charles Darwin gets 4,000 write-in votes in Athens against Paul Broun". Athens Banner-Herald.
- "GA – Election Results". Retrieved April 15, 2016.
- "Latest Hillary Clinton drama gives Bernie Sanders' write-in campaign a boost".
- "How Bernie Sanders Could Become President With Only 130,000 Votes".
- "Over 18 Million People In California Could Write-In Bernie Sanders In California, Almost No Media Reporting It".
- "Donald Duck and God mar Swedish election". The Daily Telegraph. 23 Sep 2010. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
- Geere, Duncan (24 September 2010). "Hacking Sweden's election with pen and paper". Wired UK. Retrieved 5 May 2018.