Refused ballot

A refused ballot, or similar alternative, is a choice available to voters in many elections. This is an alternative for many people to casting a disparaging spoiled ballot, which is not counted separately from ballots which have been accidentally spoiled.

Part of the Politics series
Voting
Balloting
Ballots
Candidates
Collection
Counting
Electoral systems
Plurality and majoritarian systems
Proportional and semi-proportional systems
Mixed systems
Voting strategies
Protest votes
Voting patterns and effects
Protest votes
Electoral fraud
Prevention
Politics portal

Canada

Some provinces allow a ballot to be refused on the grounds that no party satisfies the elector's vote.[1][2] Declined ballots are only legislated in the provinces of Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta; the option is only available for provincial elections.[3]

During the 2000 Canadian federal election, a number of voters (chiefly in Edmonton, Alberta) ate their ballots, as part of what they dubbed the Edible Ballot Society, to protest what they saw as inherently unfair elections. The stunt led Elections Canada to propose that there be legislation allowing federal ballots to be officially refused.[4]

Russia

Russian electoral ballots used to contain a box named Against All, allowing the voter to register a "protest vote" against all the candidates running. This was abolished by the Duma in 2006.

A March 2004 opinion poll saw ruling President Vladimir Putin draw 70% support from Russians, but "Against All" managed to claim the second place, ahead of the other candidates.[5]

In December 2004, "Against All" actually managed to draw the highest number of votes in the electoral districts of St. Petersburg, Sverdlovsk and Ulyanovsk. A repeat election led to St. Petersburg and Sverdlovsk electing proper Members of Parliament. Ulyanovsk's second vote however, after two candidates dropped out of the race, actually saw "Against All" gain more support in the polls, now pulling in 21.5% of the vote, nearly double what any of the actual candidates received.[6]

gollark: “In yet another sentence of mine that will in no way be taken out of context later: the answer is always murder”
gollark: “If you want to have your cake and eat it too, steal two cakes.”
gollark: “The laws of Australia prevail in Australia, I can assure you of that. The laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia.”This one is pretty stupid, an Australian prime minister said it.
gollark: I have a bunch of quotes on my notes thing, maybe there are stupid ones in that.
gollark: Aurora Store, if I remember right; there are at least two.

See also

References
  1. http://www.elections.ca/res/pub/ecdocs/EC50355_e.pdf
  2. http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=res&dir=rep/off/wbc&document=rec_part1&lang=e
  3. http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/06/11/ontario-election-2014-how-to-vote-for-none-of-the-above-without-spoiling-your-ballot/
  4. CBC - Canada Votes 2004 - Daily Answer - Answer Reference Shelf
  5. News Story - Department of History and Classics - University of Alberta
  6. http://www.puertorico-herald.org/issues/2004/vol8n20/OnlyRussia.shtml
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.