Water resource policy

Water resource policy encompasses the policy-making processes that affect the collection, preparation, use and disposal of water to support human uses and protect environmental quality. Water policy addresses provision, use, disposal and sustainability decisions. Provision includes identification, access, preparation for use and distribution. Uses include direct human consumption, agriculture, industry and ecosystem protection.[1] Policy must set the rules for how water is allocated to the different uses. Disposal involves wastewater treatment and stormwater/flood management. Sustainability addresses issues such as aquifer depletion, reservoir management and mineral buildup.

A second dimension of issues addresses how policies are created, executed and amended. Since water resources often cross political boundaries, water policies must often be negotiated among multiple political entities (nations, states, etc.) Commentators such as Halcrow project resource wars as demand continues to increase.[2]:27 Policy makers typically adopt a set of best management practices BMPs to govern water management. BMPs cover everything from dam construction to wastewater treatment protocols. Water resource policies may encompass "regions, catchments, shared or transboundary water resources, and inter-basin transfers. Policy leads management practices, but best management practices are identified, evaluated, modified and disseminated by policy making bodies."[3]

Water resource policy issues are receiving increased attention[2] as water shortages are believed to be at crisis levels in some regions.[4] These regional crises have potentially worldwide implications.[5][6]

World water availability

Water as a resource

When considering its utility as a resource and developing water resource policy, water can be classified into 4 different categories: green, blue, gray, and virtual water. Blue water is surface and groundwater, like water in rivers, lakes, and aquifers.[7] Green water is rainwater that was precipitated on soil that can be used naturally for plants and agriculture.[8][7] Gray water is water that has been contaminated by human use or proximity. The gray water classification can range from freshwater fertilizer runoff pollution[9] to water contaminated from dishwashers and showers.[10] Virtual water is the water consumed to make an agricultural or industrial product.[7] Calculating virtual water of a commodity is used to determine the water footprint of a country and see how much water they are importing and exporting through their goods.[11][8]

Broad Types of Water Resource Policy

Multilateral
Main article: UN-Water

The 1977 Mar del Plata United Nations Conference on Water was the first intergovernmental water conference, leading to the 1980 Declaration of the International Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Decade by the UN General Assembly.[12]

The United Nations Environmental Program hosts water resource policy-making agencies and disseminating BMPs worldwide. This role has been enhanced by various policy directives and other initiatives:

  • UN General Assembly Resolution 3436 (XXX) Agenda 21
  • 1997 Nairobi Declaration on the Role and Mandate of UNEP and
  • 2000 Malmö Ministerial Declaration adopted at the First Global Ministerial Environment Forum.[13]
  • 2002 Earth Summit 2015 safe drinking water targets.[14]
  • 2007 World Bank report series on Environment and Development[15] that in 2009 reported on Environmental Flows in Water Resources Policies, Plans, and Projects[16]

Bilateral

Treaties between nations may enumerate policies, rights and responsibilities. For instance, a treaty between Poland and Germany, "An Agreement to establish cooperation on water resources management" provides:

  • supply of drinking water of good quality,
  • protection of surface water,
  • supply of water to agriculture,
  • fight against water pollution.[17]

The Permanent Court of International Justice adjudicates disputes between nations, including water rights litigation.[18]

Covenants and Declarations

In Water Resource Policy, covenants and declarations are nonbinding goals for reaching universal human access to water for drinking and sanitation purposes. The United Nations has adopted three covenants and declarations: the 1948 Declaration of Human Rights, the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the 1966 International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights.[19] Since the 1996 International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights declaration, all 191 UN member states have also signed the Millennium Development Goals, which is a further commitment to combat health inequalities.[20] Access to safe and clean water for drinking and sanitation were fully declared human rights on July 28, 2010 through the UN General Assembly resolution A/RES/64/292.[21]

Management Rules and Regulations
Main article: List of environmental ministries

Water management rules and regulations dictate different national standards for water quality, like drinking water and environmental water quality standards. For example, in the United States, the Safe Drinking Water Act authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency to set the national standards for safe drinking water and set regulations for contaminants.[22] Within the European Union, the European Environment Agency enacted the Water Framework Directive in 2000 to regulate water resource planning, management, and protection.[23] In India, the Ministry of Environment and Forests sets the water management policies that the Central Pollution Control Board and the State Pollution Control Boards then enforce.[24] The Ministry for Environmental Protection directions national efforts for water management and regulation in China, like the Law on Prevention and Control of Water Pollution.[25]

Aid Programs and Diplomatic Efforts

Several global organizations have created aid programs and diplomatic efforts to see that progress is being made towards achieving global covenants and declarations regarding water resource access. Because health is closely tied to drinking water and sanitation access, UNICEF and the World Health Organization formed the Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation focused exclusively on monitoring and reporting progress on water, sanitation and hygiene goals as dictated by the UN.[26] Additionally, in 2000, the UN sanctioned a task force led by UNESCO, World Water Assessment Programme, to report on worldwide freshwater use and sustainability in the World Water Development Report.[27] In 2003, UN-Water was formed as an interagency coordination tool to help countries achieve their water resource goals as set by the Millennium Development Goals and make global water governance frameworks.[28]

Non-profits and non-governmental organizations also play a role in water resource policy. For example, the World Water Council is an international think tank established in 1996 to help countries and stakeholders with water resource management strategies.[29] Additionally, the US Agency for International Development (USAID) developed a Water and Development Strategy in 2013 to help people improve water supply, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) programs and help with water resource management.[30]

Economic Exchanges
Main article: Virtual water

Water Resource Policy also encompasses the economic exchange of water, known as virtual water. The term virtual water is used to understand and quantify the volume of water required for a product or service.[31] For example, when determining the virtual water trade for agricultural goods, the trade flow rate (ton/yr) would be multiplied by the virtual water content (m3/ton) of each type of produce or livestock to determine how much water was exchanged in addition to the good.[32] According to these calculations for virtual water, India, the United States, and China are the top national consumers for virtual water.[33][33] Critiques for this method have questioned virtual water's relevance in creating water resource policy, but understanding the trade of water may be useful for countries facing water scarcity to prioritize importation of virtual water instead of exportation of water-intensive goods and services.[33]

Business water resource policy initiatives

The World Business Council for Sustainable Development engages stakeholders in H2OScenarios[34] that consider various alternative policies and their effects.

In June 2011 in Geneva, the Future of Water Virtual Conference addressed water resource sustainability. Issues raised included: water infrastructure monitoring,[35] global water security, potential resource wars, interaction between water, energy, food and economic activity, the "true value" of "distribution portions of available water" and a putative "investment gap" in water infrastructure.[2][36] It was asserted that climate change will affect scarcity of water but the water security presentation emphasized that a combined effect with population growth "could be devastating".[2] Identified corporate water related risks include physical supply, regulatory and product reputation.[2]:23

This forum indicated policy concerns with:

  • trade barriers
  • price supports
  • treatment of water as a free good creates underpricing of 98% of water[2]:2
  • need to intensify debate
  • need to harmonize public/private sectors[2]:28

Issues

Environmental

Freshwater resources on earth are under increasing stress and depletion because of pollution, climate change, and consumptive use.[8]

Flood
Main article: Flood
Flash flood in Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.

Water can produce a natural disaster in the form of tsunamis, hurricanes, rogue waves and storm surge. Land-based floods can originate from infrastructural issues like bursting dams or levee failure during surges, as well as environmental phenomena like rivers overflowing their banks during increased rainfall events, urban stormwater flooding, or snowmelt.[37][38][39] The increased magnitude and frequency of floods are a result of urbanization and climate change.[39][38] Urbanization increases stormwater runoff during large rain events. Surface runoff is water that flows when heavy rains do not infiltrate soil; excess water from rain, meltwater, or other sources flowing over the land. This is a major component of the water cycle.[40] Runoff that occurs on surfaces before reaching a channel is also called a nonpoint source. When runoff flows along the ground, it can pick up soil contaminants including, but not limited to petroleum, pesticides, or fertilizers that become discharge or nonpoint source pollution.[41][9][42]

Water resource policy encompasses flood risk management and development of infrastructure to mitigate damages from floods.[37] Water resource policy solutions to flooding include land drainage for agriculture, urban planning focused on flood prevention, rainwater harvesting, and permeable surfacing of developed areas.[38]

Drought
Main article: Drought
Partially emptied Yufeng Reservoir during a drought in 2015. Photo taken in Hainan, China.

A drought is defined as a period of dry conditions with either less precipitation or more depleted water reserves than normal.[43] Because droughts are defined relative to the area's normal weather patterns and water availability, the definition varies from place to place. Overall, defining a drought takes into consideration 1.) the duration, intensity, and area of lessened precipitation or water availability and 2.) the estimated environmental, social and economic impact of the limited water.[43] For example, in Colorado, paleohydrologic data, or tree rings from areas affected by drought, have been used to define drought extent and understand the impact of past droughts to improve future water resource planning and decision making.[44]

With climate change, the frequency and intensity of droughts have been increasing but water resource policy is typically reactive instead of proactive.[45] Droughts have negative economic impacts on many sectors including agriculture, environment, energy production and transportation.[45] Local and national governments normally respond to droughts once they happen and are in crisis mode, whereas a robust policy would include early drought monitoring systems, preparedness plans, energy response programs, and impact assessment and management procedures to help mitigate the effects of drought on the economy and the environment.[45] Different nations have different policies regarding national droughts.[46][47][48] In 2013, the High-level Meeting on National Drought Policy (HMNDP) was organized by the World Meteorological Organization, the Secretariat of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) to help nations develop drought preparedness policies and plans for international emergency relief efforts in the event of droughts.[45] There were 414 participants from 87 countries that unanimously adopted the HMNDP declaration at the end of the meeting rallying national governments to implement drought management policies.[49]

Oceans and salinity
Main article: Ocean
A White Hake fishery from the Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NOAA): http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/history/

The oceans provide many important resources for the planet and humans including: transportation, marine life, food, minerals, oil, natural gas, and recreation.[50] Water resource policy involving the ocean includes jurisdiction and regulation issues, pollution regulation and reduction, over exploitation prevention, and desalination to make drinking water.[50][51]

National jurisdictions of the oceans are dictated by coastal proximity. Oceans along coastlines of nations are considered territories of that nation. For the first 12 nautical miles away from the nation's coastal border, the country has rights to the ocean for its resources, including fish and minerals, and it considered a continuation of that nation's territory.[52] The countries' economic zone, consisting of both the water column and the seafloor, continues out for 200 nautical miles where they are still entitled to the areas' resources.[52] On the other hand, the Antarctic and Southern Oceans are shared by 45 state parties under the Antarctic Treaty, so the status and ownership of Antarctic and Southern Ocean resources is unclear legally.[53] Additionally, some areas are conserved as Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and resource exploitation is prohibited. For example, by 1997 off the coast of California, there were 103 MPAs.[54]

The oceans are becoming polluted and exploited for resources.[50] With increasing carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels, the oceans are experiencing acidification.[55] Decreasing the pH of the ocean makes it more difficult for marine organisms, like coral reefs, to make their calcium carbonate shells.[55] Additionally, pollution is threatening oceanic resources, especially near coasts.[50] Oil rigs and undersea mineral extraction can create problems that affect shorelines, marine life, fisheries and human safety. Decommissioning of such operations has another set of issues. Rigs-to-reefs is a proposal for using obsolete oil rigs as substrate for coral reefs that has failed to reach consensus. There have been oil tanker accidents and oil pipeline spills like the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.[50] Ballast water, fuel/oil leaks and trash originating from ships foul harbors, reefs and estuaries pollute the oceans. Ballast water may contain toxins, invasive plants, animals, viruses, and bacteria. Additionally, marine debris, or industrially processed materials that have been dumped in the oceans, threatens the wellbeing and biodiversity of marine organisms.[56] Along coasts, oceans are threatened by land runoff that includes fertilizers, insecticides, chemicals, and organic pollutants that can cause algal blooms and dead zones.[50]

Fisheries also have an effect on oceans and can fall under water resource policy rules. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 87% of the fisheries worldwide are either fully exploited or overexploited.[57] Regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) control and oversee high sea fisheries under the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the UN FishStocks Agreement.[57] Poor management by RFMOs, government subsidies for fish, and illegal fish catches have contributed to overfishing and over exploitation of ocean resources.[57] Ecosystem-based fishery management (EBFM) is an attempt to correct some RFMO mismanagement by limiting biomass that is allowed to be removed by fisheries, and by making sure fishing is more targeted for the desired species.[58] One problem EBFM tries to eliminate is bycatch, or unintentional catching of the wrong fish species.[58] For example, white marlin, an endangered billfish, is mostly accidentally caught and killed by swordfish and tuna longline fisheries.[58]

Desalination of seawater is becoming a resource for coastal nations needing freshwater for industry and drinking, particularly areas with over exploited groundwater aquifers and surface water, pollution of freshwater, or unreliable water supply due to climate change.[51] Desalination is particularly popular in arid, water-stressed regions like Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Cyprus, Israel, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Australia, and California, USA.[59][60][61][51]

Freshwater
Surface and groundwater

Surface water and groundwater can be studied and managed as separate resources as a single resource in multiple forms.[62] Jurisdictions typically distinguish three recognized groundwater classifications: subterranean streams, underflow of surface waters, and percolating groundwater.[63]

Constituencies

Drinking water and water for utilitarian uses such as washing, crop cultivation and manufacture is competed for by various constituencies:

  • Residential
  • Agriculture. "Many rural people practice subsistence rain fed agriculture as a basic livelihood strategy, and as such are vulnerable to the effects of drought or flood that can diminish or destroy a harvest. "[64]
  • Construction
  • Industrial
  • Municipal or institutional activities

Surface water (runoff) and wastewater discharge

Regulatory bodies address piped waste water discharges to surface water that include riparian and ocean ecosystems.[65] These review bodies are charged with protecting wilderness ecology, wildlife habitat, drinking water, agricultural irrigation and fisheries. Stormwater discharge can carry fertilizer residue and bacterial contamination from domestic and wild animals.[66] They have the authority to make orders which are binding upon private actors such as international corporations[67] and do not hesitate to exercise the police powers of the state. Water agencies have statutory mandate which in many jurisdictions is resilient to pressure from constituents and lawmakers in which they on occasion stand their ground despite heated opposition from agricultural interests[68] On the other hand, the Boards enjoy strong support from environmental concerns such as Greenpeace,Heal the Ocean and Channelkeepers.[69]

Water quality issues or sanitation concerns reuse or water recycling and pollution control which in turn breaks out into stormwater and wastewater.

Wastewater
Main article: Wastewater

Wastewater is water that has been discharged from human use. The primary discharges flow from the following sources:

  • residences
  • commercial properties
  • industry
  • agriculture

Sewage is technically wastewater contaminated with fecal and similar animal waste byproducts, but is frequently used as a synonym for wastewater. Origination includes cesspool and sewage outfall pipes.

Water treatment is subject to the same overlapping jurisdictional constraints which affect other aspects of water policy.[70] For instance, levels of chloramines with their resulting toxic trihalomethane by-product are subject to Federal guidelines even though water management implementing those policy constraints are carried out by local water boards.[71]

Water as a Human Right

On July 28, 2010, the United Nations adopted a resolution declaring that access to clean water and sanitation is a human right.[72] The debate of whether or not clean water access is a human right stems from the fact that, when water is treated as an economic good instead of a right, it may not be affordable to many people.[73] The UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development lists 17 goals to achieve by 2030, including to "ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all."[74] There are several other goals that are closely linked to water access, including: ending hunger, improving health, especially for children and mothers, achieving equal and inclusive education, and promoting gender equality.[75] Water availability issues disproportionally affect women and girls because, in the absence of infrastructure to deliver water or under water scarcity conditions, they are required to spend a lot of their time collecting water for their households and communities.[76] Improving water access, especially in rural communities and developing nations, helps close the gender gap for children's enrollment in school and allows women to participate in paid work.[77] There is a lot of work to be done in achieving clean water access to all people: an estimated 30% of people in the world do not have safe drinking water, countries containing 2 billion people regularly deal with water stress, and 4 billion people experience severe water scarcity during at least one month annually.[76]

Structural constraints on policy makers

Policies are implemented by organizational entities created by government exercise of state power. However, all such entities are subject to constraints upon their autonomy.[70]

Jurisdictional issues

Subject matter and geographic jurisdiction are distinguishable.[78] The jurisdiction of any water agency is limited by political boundaries and by enabling legislation. In some cases, limits target specific types of uses (wilderness, agricultural, urban-residential, urban-commercial, etc.) A second part of jurisdictional limitation governs the subject matter that the agency controls, such as flood control, water supply and sanitation, etc. In many locations, agencies may face unclear or overlapping authority, increasing conflicts and delaying conflict resolution.

Typical information access issue

As reported by the non-partisan Civil Society Institute, a 2005 US Congressional study on water supply was suppressed and became the target of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation.[79]

Multi-jurisdictional issues

One jurisdiction's projects may cause problems in other jurisdictions. For instance, Monterey County, California controls a body of water that acts as a reservoir for San Luis Obispo County. The specific responsibilities for managing the resource must therefore be negotiated

gollark: You-the-mind will be in hospital, you-the-original-body will be dead.
gollark: Unlike with brains, which will keep trying to work and probably route around broken bits, but still lose functionality in the process.
gollark: Code will probably crash if RAM contents are randomly messed up or something, but you can then reload its data from a backup.
gollark: If the döppelganger is, well, identical, why is it not you?
gollark: Why?

See also

References
  1. "Law on Water Resources Development".
  2. "Global Citizenship - Dow" (PDF). www.futurewecreate.com.
  3. "IWRM Toolbox".
  4. "Integrated Water Resources Management" (PDF).
  5. "Fight for Water Hits Crisis Levels Worldwide".
  6. "GLOBAL WATER OUTLOOK TO 2025" (PDF).
  7. Lal, Rattan (2015-07-08). "World Water Resources and Achieving Water Security". Agronomy Journal. 107 (4): 1526–1532. doi:10.2134/agronj15.0045. ISSN 0002-1962.
  8. Hoekstra, Arjen Y.; Mekonnen, Mesfin M. (2012-02-28). "The water footprint of humanity". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109 (9): 3232–3237. Bibcode:2012PNAS..109.3232H. doi:10.1073/pnas.1109936109. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3295316. PMID 22331890.
  9. Mekonnen, Mesfin M.; Hoekstra, Arjen Y. (2015-11-03). "Global Gray Water Footprint and Water Pollution Levels Related to Anthropogenic Nitrogen Loads to Fresh Water". Environmental Science & Technology. 49 (21): 12860–12868. Bibcode:2015EnST...4912860M. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03191. ISSN 0013-936X. PMID 26440220.
  10. , "Process and system for recycling and reusing gray water", issued 1996-02-13
  11. Chapagain, A. K.; Hoekstra, A. Y. (2004). "Water footprints of nations". Value of Water Research Report Series. Institute for Water Education. 16.
  12. "Giving an audible voice to water".
  13. "Division of Environmental Law and Conventions".
  14. "Global Water Supply and Sanitation Assessment 2000 Report". Who.int. Retrieved 2014-01-22.
  15. "World Bank-Series on Environment and Development" (PDF).
  16. "Environmental Flows in Water Resources Policies, Plans, and Projects-World Bank-Series on Environment and Development" (PDF).
  17. "Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of Poland on cooperation on water resource management".
  18. "Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of Poland on cooperation on water resource management".
  19. Meier, Benjamin Mason; Kayser, Georgia Lyn; Amjad, Urooj Quezon; Bartram, Jamie (2013-02-01). "Implementing an evolving human right through water and sanitation policy". Water Policy. 15 (1): 116–133. doi:10.2166/wp.2012.198. ISSN 1366-7017. PMC 7006955. PMID 32038095.
  20. Progress on sanitation and drinking-water : 2014 update. World Health Organization., UNICEF. Geneva. ISBN 978-92-4-069281-7. OCLC 889699199.CS1 maint: others (link)
  21. The right to water : politics, governance and social struggles. Sultana, Farhana., Loftus, Alex. (1st ed.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Earthscan/Routledge. 2012. ISBN 978-1-84971-360-3. OCLC 731925155.CS1 maint: others (link)
  22. Systemadmin_Umwelt (2013-01-18). Current approaches to Cyanotoxin risk assessment, risk management and regulations in different countries (2012). Umweltbundesamt.
  23. Kaika, Maria (2003). "The Water Framework Directive: A New Directive for a Changing Social, Political and Economic European Framework" (PDF). European Planning Studies. 11 (3): 299–316. doi:10.1080/09654310303640. ISSN 0965-4313.
  24. Greenstone, Michael; Hanna, Rema (2014). "Environmental Regulations, Air and Water Pollution, and Infant Mortality in India". American Economic Review. 104 (10): 3038–3072. doi:10.1257/aer.104.10.3038. hdl:1721.1/66288. ISSN 0002-8282.
  25. Winalski, D.. (2009). Cleaner water in China? The implications of the amendments to China's law on the prevention and control of water pollution. 24. 181-201.
  26. Progress on drinking water and sanitation. 2012 update. WHO/UNICEF Joint Water Supply and Sanitation Monitoring Programme., World Health Organization., UNICEF. New York, N.Y.: UNICEF. 2012. ISBN 978-92-806-4632-0. OCLC 793571735.CS1 maint: others (link)
  27. Water in a changing world. World Water Assessment Programme (United Nations), UN-Water., Unesco. ([3rd ed.] ed.). Paris: UNESCO Pub. 2009. ISBN 978-1-84407-839-4. OCLC 316311124.CS1 maint: others (link)
  28. Baumgartner, Thomas; Pahl-Wostl, Claudia (2013). "UN–Water and its Role in Global Water Governance". Ecology and Society. 18 (3). doi:10.5751/ES-05564-180303. ISSN 1708-3087. JSTOR 26269338.
  29. Abu-Zeid, M (1998). "Water and sustainable development: the vision for world water, life and the environment". Water Policy. 1 (1): 9–19. doi:10.1016/S1366-7017(98)00002-6. ISSN 1366-7017.
  30. "Water and Development Strategy 2013-2018" (PDF). US Agency for International Development.
  31. Chapagain, A. K.; Hoekstra, A. Y. (2004). "Water footprints of nations". Value of Water Research Report Series.
  32. Hoekstra, A.Y. (2002). "Virtual Water Trade: A Quantification of Virtual Water Flows Between Nations in Relation to International Crop Trade" (PDF). Value of Water Research Report Series. 11.
  33. Chen, Zhan-Ming; Chen, G. Q. (2013-05-01). "Virtual water accounting for the globalized world economy: National water footprint and international virtual water trade". Ecological Indicators. 10 years Ecological Indicators. 28: 142–149. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.024. ISSN 1470-160X.
  34. "H2OScenarios".
  35. "Global Citizenship - Dow" (PDF). www.futurewecreate.com.
  36. "The Future of Science Education".
  37. Levy, Jason K. (2005-12-01). "Multiple criteria decision making and decision support systems for flood risk management". Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 19 (6): 438–447. doi:10.1007/s00477-005-0009-2. ISSN 1436-3259.
  38. Wheater, Howard; Evans, Edward (2009). "Land use, water management and future flood risk". Land Use Policy. 26: S251–S264. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.019.
  39. Cunderlik, Juraj M.; Ouarda, Taha B. M. J. (2009-09-15). "Trends in the timing and magnitude of floods in Canada". Journal of Hydrology. 375 (3): 471–480. Bibcode:2009JHyd..375..471C. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.050. ISSN 0022-1694.
  40. Beven, Keith (2004). "Robert E. Horton's perceptual model of infiltration processes". Hydrological Processes. 18 (17): 3447–3460. Bibcode:2004HyPr...18.3447B. doi:10.1002/hyp.5740.
  41. Davis, Mackenzie; Masten, Susan (22 February 2013). Principles of Environmental Engineering Science: Third Edition. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. ISBN 978-0-07-749219-9.
  42. Whipple, W.; Hunter, J. V. (1977). "Nonpoint Sources and Planning for Water Pollution Control". Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation). 49 (1): 15–23. ISSN 0043-1303. JSTOR 25039214.
  43. Tate, E. L.; Gustard, A. (2000), Vogt, Jürgen V.; Somma, Francesca (eds.), "Drought Definition: A Hydrological Perspective", Drought and Drought Mitigation in Europe, Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, Springer Netherlands, pp. 23–48, doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9472-1_3, ISBN 978-94-015-9472-1
  44. Woodhouse, C A; Lukas, J J (2006). "Drought, Tree Rings and Water Resource Management in Colorado". Canadian Water Resources Journal. 31 (4): 297–310. doi:10.4296/cwrj3104297. ISSN 0701-1784.
  45. Wilhite, Donald A.; Sivakumar, Mannava V. K.; Pulwarty, Roger (2014-06-01). "Managing drought risk in a changing climate: The role of national drought policy". Weather and Climate Extremes. High Level Meeting on National Drought Policy. 3: 4–13. doi:10.1016/j.wace.2014.01.002. ISSN 2212-0947.
  46. Kendall, Matt (2013). "Drought and its Role in Shaping Water Policy in Australia". In Schwabe, Kurt; Albiac, Jose; Connor, Jeffery D.; Hassan, Rashid M. (eds.). Drought in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions. Drought in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions: A Multi-Disciplinary and Cross-Country Perspective. Springer Netherlands. pp. 451–467. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6636-5_26. ISBN 978-94-007-6636-5.
  47. Xiao-jun, Wang; Jian-yun, Zhang; Shahid, Shamsuddin; ElMahdi, Amgad; Rui-min, He; Zhen-xin, Bao; Ali, Mahtab (2012-12-01). "Water resources management strategy for adaptation to droughts in China". Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 17 (8): 923–937. doi:10.1007/s11027-011-9352-4. ISSN 1573-1596.
  48. Falkenmark, Malin; Rockström, Johan (2008). "Building resilience to drought in desertification-prone savannas in Sub-Saharan Africa: The water perspective". Natural Resources Forum. 32 (2): 93–102. doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2008.00177.x. ISSN 1477-8947.
  49. Sivakumar, Mannava V. K.; Stefanski, Robert; Bazza, Mohamed; Zelaya, Sergio; Wilhite, Donald; Magalhaes, Antonio Rocha (2014-06-01). "High Level Meeting on National Drought Policy: Summary and Major Outcomes". Weather and Climate Extremes. High Level Meeting on National Drought Policy. 3: 126–132. doi:10.1016/j.wace.2014.03.007. ISSN 2212-0947.
  50. Freestone, David; Salman, Salman M. A. (2008-08-07). Bodansky, Daniel; Brunnée, Jutta; Hey, Ellen (eds.). "Ocean and Freshwater Resources". The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552153.013.0015. ISBN 9780199552153.
  51. Shrestha, Eleeja; Ahmad, Sajjad; Johnson, Walter; Shrestha, Pramen; Batista, Jacimaria R. (2011-10-03). "Carbon footprint of water conveyance versus desalination as alternatives to expand water supply". Desalination. 280 (1): 33–43. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.062. ISSN 0011-9164.
  52. "Ocean Governance: Who Owns the Ocean? | Heinrich Böll Stiftung". Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung. Retrieved 2019-11-27.
  53. Jabour-Green, Julia; Nicol, Dianne (2003). "Bioprospecting in Areas Outside National Jurisdiction: Antarctica and the Southern Ocean". 4 Melb. J. Int'l L. 76.
  54. Hyrenbach, K. David; Forney, Karin A.; Dayton, Paul K. (2000). "Marine protected areas and ocean basin management". Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 10 (6): 437–458. doi:10.1002/1099-0755(200011/12)10:6<437::AID-AQC425>3.0.CO;2-Q. ISSN 1099-0755.
  55. Cao, Long; Caldeira, Ken (2008). "Atmospheric CO2 stabilization and ocean acidification". Geophysical Research Letters. 35 (19): L19609. Bibcode:2008GeoRL..3519609C. doi:10.1029/2008GL035072. ISSN 1944-8007.
  56. Gall, S. C.; Thompson, R. C. (2015-03-15). "The impact of debris on marine life". Marine Pollution Bulletin. 92 (1): 170–179. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.12.041. ISSN 0025-326X. PMID 25680883.
  57. Gjerde, Kristina M.; Currie, Duncan; Wowk, Kateryna; Sack, Karen (2013-09-30). "Ocean in peril: Reforming the management of global ocean living resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction". Marine Pollution Bulletin. The Global State of the Ocean; Interactions Between Stresses, Impacts and Some Potential Solutions. Synthesis papers from the International Programme on the State of the Ocean 2011 and 2012 Workshops. 74 (2): 540–551. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.037. ISSN 0025-326X. PMID 23968992.
  58. Pikitch, E. K.; Santora, C.; Babcock, E. A.; Bakun, A.; Bonfil, R.; Conover, D. O.; Dayton, P.; Doukakis, P.; Fluharty, D.; Heneman, B.; Houde, E. D. (2004-07-16). "Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management". Science. 305 (5682): 346–347. doi:10.1126/science.1098222. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 15256658.
  59. El-Sadek, Alaa (2010-01-30). "Water desalination: An imperative measure for water security in Egypt". Desalination. 250 (3): 876–884. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.143. ISSN 0011-9164.
  60. O. Jaber, Jamal; S. Mohsen, Mousa (2001-05-01). "Evaluation of non-conventional water resources supply in Jordan". Desalination. 136 (1): 83–92. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00168-0. ISSN 0011-9164.
  61. Hamoda, Mohamed F. (2001-09-20). "Desalination and water resource management in Kuwait". Desalination. European Conference on DESALINATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT WATER SHORTAGE. 138 (1): 385–393. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00288-0. ISSN 0011-9164.
  62. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Denver, CO. "Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource." USGS Circular 1139. 1998.
  63. "WATER RIGHTS FACT SHEET". Archived from the original on June 15, 2011. Retrieved June 21, 2011.
  64. Pedreros, Diego H. "Evaluation of the Use of Forecast Interpretations information". University of California Santa Barbara: 16th Conference on Climate Variability and Change. Bonilla, A.; Ramirez, P.; Funk, C.; Husak, G.; Michaelsen, J.; Aguilar, L. "Climate Predictions on Seasonal and Interannual Time Scales".
  65. "State and Regional Water Boards".
  66. "Whom We Regulate".
  67. "Water quality board orders Shell to clean soil at Carousel tract in Carson".
  68. "California water rules rile farmers".
  69. "Hilary Spoke To Regional Water Quality Control Board Today".
  70. Poulantzas, Nicos Ar (1978). Political Power and Social Classes. Verso. ISBN 978-0-8052-7050-1.
  71. "Something in Your Water Is About to Change!". Archived from the original on January 25, 2010. Retrieved June 24, 2011.
  72. "General Assembly declares access to clean water and sanitation is a human right". UN News. 28 July 2010. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  73. Bluemel, Erik B. (2005-02-15). "The Implications of Formulating a Human Right to Water". Rochester, NY. SSRN 1367759. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  74. UN General Assembly, Transforming our world : the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 21 October 2015, A/RES/70/1, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html
  75. Anand, P. B. (2007). "Right to water and access to water: an assessment". Journal of International Development (in French). 19 (4): 511–526. doi:10.1002/jid.1386. ISSN 1099-1328.
  76. Leaving no one behind : the United Nations World Water Development Report 2019. Unesco,, World Water Assessment Programme (United Nations),, UN-Water. Paris. 19 March 2019. ISBN 978-92-3-100309-7. OCLC 1121476686.CS1 maint: others (link)
  77. Koolwal, Gayatri; van de Walle, Dominique (2013). "Access to Water, Women's Work, and Child Outcomes". Economic Development and Cultural Change. 61 (2): 369–405. doi:10.1086/668280. hdl:10986/3789. ISSN 0013-0079.
  78. Black, Henry Campbell (1999). Black's Law Dictionary. West Group. ISBN 978-0-314-22864-2.
  79. "Foia Lawsuit Targets U.S. Department Of Energy For Withholding 'Water Energy Roadmap' Ordered By Congress". Civilsocietyinstitute.org. Retrieved 2014-07-14.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.