Trump tariffs

The Trump tariffs are a series of United States tariffs imposed during the presidency of Donald Trump as part of his "America First" economic policy to reduce the United States trade deficit by shifting American trade policy from multilateral free trade agreements to bilateral trade deals. In January 2018, Trump imposed tariffs on solar panels and washing machines of 30 to 50 percent.[1] In March 2018 he imposed tariffs on steel (25%) and aluminum (10%) from most countries,[2][3] which, according to Morgan Stanley, covered an estimated 4.1 percent of U.S. imports.[4] On June 1, 2018, this was extended to the European Union, Canada, and Mexico.[3] In separate moves, the Trump administration has set and escalated tariffs on goods imported from China, leading to a trade war.[5]

This article is part of
a series about
Donald Trump
Incumbent
Presidential campaigns
Interactions involving Russia
Business and personal

The tariffs angered trading partners, who implemented retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods.[6] In June 2018, India planned to recoup trade penalties of $241 million on $1.2 billion worth of Indian steel and aluminum,[7] but attempted talks delayed these until June 2019 when India imposed retaliatory tariffs on $240 million worth of U.S. goods.[8] Canada imposed matching retaliatory tariffs on July 1, 2018.[9][10] China implemented retaliatory tariffs equivalent to the $34 billion tariff imposed on it by the U.S.[11] Other countries, such as Australia, expressed concern over the consequences of a trade war.[12] In July 2018, the Trump administration announced it would use a Great Depression-era program, the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), to pay farmers up to $12 billion, increasing the aid to $28 billion in May 2019.[13] This government assistance program aims to make up a shortfall as farmers lose sales abroad due to the trade war and retaliatory tariffs from the European Union and other states.[14] The USDA estimated that aid payments constituted one third of total farm income in 2019.[15]

Tariff negotiations in North America were relatively more successful, with the U.S. lifting the steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada and Mexico on May 20, 2019, joining Australia and Argentina in being the only nations exempted from the regulations.[16][17] However, on May 30, Trump unilaterally announced his intention to impose a five percent tariff on all imports from Mexico beginning on June 10, with tariffs increasing to ten percent on July 1, and by another five percent each month for three months, "until such time as illegal migrants coming through Mexico, and into our Country, STOP," adding illegal immigration as a condition for U.S.-Mexico tariff negotiations. The move was seen as threatening the ratification of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), the North American trade deal set to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).[18] The tariffs were averted on June 7.[19]

A May 2019 analysis conducted by CNBC found Trump's tariffs are equivalent to one of the largest tax increases in the U.S. in decades.[20][21][22] Studies have found that Trump's tariffs reduced real income in the United States, as well as adversely affected U.S. GDP.[23][24][25] Studies have found that the tariffs adversely affected Republican candidates in elections.[26][27][28]

Background
See also: Tariffs in United States history and Protectionism in the United States
Average tariff rates in the U.S. (1821–2016)

Trump adopted his current views on trade issues in the 1980s, saying Japan and other nations were taking advantage of the United States.[29] During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump repeatedly favored policy proposals that renegotiate trade agreements for the United States. During a meeting with the New York Times Editorial Board in January 2016, Trump said he would tax Chinese imports into the United States by 45%.[30] Trump frequently criticized the North American Free Trade Agreement calling it "the worst trade deal the U.S. has ever signed".[31] He also called Trans-Pacific Partnership "the death blow for American manufacturing" and said it would "put the interests of foreign countries above our own".[32]

Policy

On November 21, 2016, in a video message, Trump introduced an economic strategy of "putting America first", saying he would negotiate "fair, bilateral trade deals that bring jobs and industry back on to American shores". On January 23, 2017, three days after becoming president, Trump withdrew the United States from the politically divisive Trans-Pacific Partnership believing the agreement would "undermine" the U.S. economy and sovereignty.[33][34][35][36]

Trump has also indicated a desire to end the North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico. His administration has renegotiated the terms of the agreement. Trump had threatened to withdraw from it if negotiations fail.[37] He has specifically criticized the Ford Motor Co.,[38] Carrier Corporation,[38] and Mondelez International for having operations based in Mexico.[38][39][40] In August 2015, in response to Oreo maker Mondelez International's announcement that it would move manufacturing to Mexico, Trump said he would boycott Oreos.[40] The new deal increases the percentage of parts and manufacturing that must be done in North America for domestic automobiles, sets a minimum wage for some workers on auto parts, and expands access for U.S. dairy sales to Canada.[41]

Similar to his approach to trade deals, Trump also pledged, as part of the Contract with the American Voter, to impose tariffs to discourage companies from laying off workers or relocating to other countries, through an "End the Offshoring Act".[42][43][44] No such act has been introduced in Congress,[45][46][47] but Trump has moved to impose tariffs on solar panels, washing machines, steel, and aluminum. The enforcement of the tariffs falls primarily within the purview of the Department of Commerce and Office of the United States Trade Representative.

Trump has repeatedly promised to lower America's trade deficit, and has argued for a renegotiation of trade deals and imposition of tariffs to that end.[48][49] These efforts notwithstanding, during 2018 the trade deficit continued to increase.[49]

In November 2018, Trump argued that the tariffs enriched the United States. He said the United States was gaining "Billions of Dollars" from "Tariffs being charged to China". He added, "If companies don't want to pay Tariffs, build in the U.S.A. Otherwise, let's just make our Country richer than ever before!" Fact-checkers and economists described the assertions made by Trump as false, with the Associated Press writing "Almost all economists say the president is wrong. That's because tariffs are taxes on imports. They can cause higher prices, reduce trade among countries and hurt overall economic growth as a result."[50][51]

Legality
U.S. Trade Balance and Trade Policy (1895–2015)

Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution: "Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises." But Congress has repeatedly shifted its powers regarding tariffs to the president.[52] Beginning in 1917 with the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 the president can impose any tariff while the nation is at war. The affected trade does not have to be connected to the ongoing war. Since 1974 the Trade Act of 1974 allows the president to impose a 15% tariff for 150 days if there is "an adverse impact on national security from imports." After 150 days the tariff expires unless extended by Congress. In 1977 the International Emergency Economic Powers Act shifted powers even more towards the White House. The Trump administration claims that it gives the President the authority to raise tariffs without any limits during a national emergency of any kind. Legal scholars disagree because the IEEPA does not mention tariffs at all and transfers no authority of tariffs towards the President.[53]

Enacted
Historical average tariff rates on manufactured products

Solar panels
Effect of tariffs on U.S. solar panel imports

On January 23, 2018, news outlets announced that Trump had imposed tariffs on solar panels produced outside the United States. The tariffs initially start at 30% and will gradually fall to 15% in four years.[54][55] The first 2.5 gigawatts of solar cells imported each year will be exempted from the tariff.[56]

Tariffs on Solar Panels[56]
Components Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Safeguard Tariff on Modules and Cells 30% 25% 20% 15%
Cells Exempted from Tariff 2.5 gigawatts 2.5 gigawatts 2.5 gigawatts 2.5 gigawatts

China is currently the world leader in solar panel manufacture, and has decried the tariffs.[57] Zhong Shan, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said in a statement, "With regard to the wrong measures taken by the United States, China will work with other W.T.O. members to resolutely defend our legitimate interests."[58]

Washing machines

On January 23, 2018, in conjunction with the tariffs placed on solar panels, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative announced tariffs on washing machines.[56] According to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), imports of large residential washers increased "steadily" from 2012 to 2016, and domestic producers' financial performance "declined precipitously".[59] In the first year, the tariffs start at 20% for the first 1.2 million units of imported finished washers, and all subsequent washers within that year will have a 50% tariff. By the third year initial tariff will go down to 16-40%, following the same pattern.

The tariffs came after a petition was filed by Whirlpool, a U.S.-based washing machine manufacturer facing tough competition from LG Electronics and Samsung, which are both based in South Korea.[60]

Tariffs on washing machines[56]
Components Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
First 1.2 million units of imported finished washers 20% 18% 16%
All subsequent imports of finished washers 50% 45% 40%
Tariff on covered parts 50% 45% 40%
Covered parts excluded from tariff 50,000 units 70,000 units 90,000 units

In 2016, China exported $425 million worth of washers to the United States, followed by Mexico with $240 million, and South Korean companies $130 million.[59] Samsung and LG are among the top exporters of washers to the United States. Two weeks before the tariff announcement, Samsung had moved its production of washing machines to a new plant in South Carolina. In response Samsung said U.S. consumers will "pay more, with fewer choices". Mexican officials said they would respond to the tariffs during the ongoing NAFTA renegotiations.[61]

Steel and aluminum

On March 1, 2018, Trump announced his intention to impose a 25% tariff on steel and a 10% tariff on aluminum imports.[62] In a tweet the next day, Trump asserted, "Trade wars are good, and easy to win."[63] On March 8, he signed an order to impose the tariffs effective after 15 days.[2] The EU, Canada, Mexico, Australia, Argentina, Brazil and South Korea were temporarily exempted from the order under a carve-out provision.[64] Canada, Mexico, and the EU became subject to the steel and aluminium tariffs later in an announcement on May 31, 2018.[2][65][66] The U.S., Canada, and Mexico would reach a deal to remove the steel and aluminum tariffs in May 2019, almost a year after going into effect.[67]

In December 2019, Trump tweeted that he would impose tariffs on Brazilian and Argentine metals, effective immediately, alleging the countries were manipulating their currencies to make their products more attractive in global markets. Economists disagreed the countries were devaluing their currencies, attributing the declines to global market forces. After speaking with Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro, Trump days later backed down from his threat against Brazil, but made no mention of Argentina.[68]

Permanent steel exemption

While the 25% steel tariff as a rule applies to all countries worldwide, four countries have successfully negotiated a permanent exemption from it.[69][70][71] Former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull successfully lobbied President Trump to get an exemption at the 2017 G20 Hamburg summit, arguing "[w]e do this steel that's specialty steel. We're the only one that produces it in the world. You've got to let us out. You've got a $40 billion trade surplus with us. We're military allies with you. We're in every battle with you."[72] However, On December 2, 2019, President Donald Trump reinstated steel and aluminium tariffs against Brazil, later backed down, and Argentina.[73]

CountryDate grantedDate withdrawn
 South KoreaMarch 28, 2018
 ArgentinaMay 2, 2018December 2, 2019
 AustraliaMay 2, 2018
 BrazilMay 2, 2018
December 2019		December 2, 2019

The legal basis cited in Trump's tariff order is Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 which under certain circumstances allows the president to impose tariffs based on the recommendation from the U.S. Secretary of Commerce if "an article is being imported into the United States in such quantities or under such circumstances as to threaten or impair the national security."[74] This section is rarely used,[74] and has never been invoked since the World Trade Organization was established in 1995.[75]

China initiated a WTO complaint against the U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs on April 9, 2018.[76] The EU opened a similar WTO case on June 1, 2018.[77]

On June 9, 2018, Trump tweeted a statement addressing Prime Minister of Canada Justin Trudeau in which he said American tariffs targeting Canada "are in response to his [tariffs] of 270% on dairy!"[78] In the tweet, Trump did not cite national security, the legal basis for implementing the tariff.[79][80]

Economic and trade analysis
Opening trade to imports lowers the price from Pa to Pw and increases the quantity from Qa to Ct. This increases consumer surplus (the area under the demand curve but above price) by X+Z as consumers can purchase more goods at lower prices. However, it also reduces producer surplus (the area above the supply curve but below the price) by X, as domestic producers supply fewer goods at lower prices. Domestic producers will choose to produce at Qt, with the quantity gap between Qt and Ct filled by imports. This overall gain from free trade is area Z, although there are winners (consumers) and losers (domestic firms and their employees).[81]
Diagram showing effects of an import tariff, which hurts domestic consumers more than domestic producers are helped. Higher prices and lower quantities reduce consumer surplus (the area above price but under the demand curve) by areas A+B+C+D, while expanding producer surplus (the area below price but above the supply curve) by A and government revenue by C (the import quantity times the tariff price.) Areas B and D are dead-weight losses, surplus lost by consumers and overall.[81]

A survey of leading economists by the Initiative on Global Markets at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business showed a consensus that imposing new U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum will not improve Americans' welfare.[82] Economists say the tariffs will lead to more harm than gains, as the price for steel increases, which will harm consumers and Americans working in manufacturing industries that use steel (these jobs outnumber those who work in steel-producing sectors by 80 to 1).[83][84][85] The big winners of the tariffs are some American steel- and aluminum-producing industries; some of the producers (especially small- and middle-sized ones) who are reliant on foreign inputs may struggle as a result of the tariffs.[85][86][87] A study of the proposal indicated that it would lead to an estimated loss of 146,000 jobs.[88] Studies of the 2002 steel tariffs enacted by the Bush administration show that they caused more job losses than job gains.[83] Jobs losses could be even greater if other countries retaliate against the United States with their own tariffs on various American products.[89]

Scholars warned that the Trump administration's use of "national security" rationales[90] (these have not been commonly used by past administrations) for the tariffs could undermine the international trading order, as other states could use the same rationales for their own tariffs.[83][91][85][92] The WTO allows states to take actions necessary to ensure their national security, but this provision has been sparsely used, given that it could be abused.[93] Whereas national security reasons were cited for the tariffs, it has been noted that tariffs primarily harm American allies, not enemies; the United States imports very little steel and aluminum from China directly.[94] Trade experts furthermore noted that the United States already produces more than two-thirds of its own steel.[92]

Forty-five U.S. trade associations are urging Trump not to impose tariffs on China, warning it would be "particularly harmful" to the U.S. economy and consumers.[95]

The National Retail Federation has been vocal in its opposition of the tariffs. The NRF also launched an ad campaign with Ben Stein, who reprised his role as the economics teacher from "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" arguing that tariffs are bad economics and hurt consumers.[96][97][98]

General Motors announced closure of plants in Maryland, Michigan, Ohio, and Ontario, and cutting over 14,000 jobs, citing steel tariffs as a factor.[99][100] Trump expressed frustration with the decision.[101]

Domestic political response

Domestically, reactions from elected officials often varied among regional lines rather than ideological lines.[102] The tariffs have seen widespread criticism from conservatives and Republicans.[103][104][105] However, the Republican-controlled Congress has thus far declined to take any action to counter Trump's imposition of tariffs.[106][107] Speaker Paul Ryan said Congress would not pass any tariff legislation that Trump would veto.[106]

Reception was mixed among Democratic officials,[108] with Democrats from Rust Belt states voicing support for tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.[109]

The AFL-CIO, the largest labor union in the U.S., praised Trump for the tariffs, as did Democratic Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown, who said the action would be a boon for "steel plants across Ohio". Many congressional Republicans expressed fear that the tariffs might damage the economy or lead to retaliatory tariffs from other countries. Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell urged Trump to rethink his proposal or to target the tariffs more narrowly so as to avoid "unintended consequences and collateral damage".[110] House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, while calling for strategic and targeted actions against "trade cheaters," criticized Trump's rollout of the tariffs, calling it "chaotic" and saying it was "maximizing the collateral damage to American workers, consumers and our international alliances".[111] The proposal drew comparisons to a tariff imposed by his Republican presidential predecessor, George W. Bush;[112] in 2002 the U.S. imposed heavy steel tariffs that were largely seen as ineffectual or even harmful to the U.S., and were withdrawn after 18 months.[113]

On March 6, 2018, Gary Cohn, chair of the National Economic Council, announced his intention to resign; the announcement followed Trump's cancellation of a meeting with end-users of steel and aluminum that Cohn had arranged in an attempt to dissuade the president from the planned tariffs.[114]

A March 2018 Quinnipiac University poll showed widespread disapproval of the tariffs, with only 29% of Americans agreeing with a "25% tariff on steel imports and a 10% tariff on aluminum imports" if it raised their cost of living.[115]

On June 13, 2019, 661 American companies sent a letter to Trump urging him to resolve the trade dispute with China. The letter was one of many sent on behalf of Tariffs Hurt the Heartland, an organization of over 150 trade groups representing agriculture, manufacturing, retailing and technology companies.[116][117]

Lifting

On May 17, 2019, the U.S. reached a deal to lift the steel and aluminum tariffs on Mexico and Canada. Lifting the tariffs were seen as helping pave the way for further ratification of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement. According to a joint statement, the Canadian and the U.S. governments said the U.S. will scrap the metals duties within two days of the deal. Canada will remove tariffs levied on American goods in retaliation for the steel and aluminum duties. The countries will also drop all pending litigation in the World Trade Organization related to the tariffs, set up measures to "prevent the importation of aluminum or steel that is unfairly subsidized and/or sold at dumped prices" and "prevent the transshipment of aluminum and steel made outside of Canada or the United States to the other country" and make an "agreed-upon process for monitoring aluminum and steel trade between them". In a separate statement, the Mexican government also said it would remove retaliatory tariffs it put on the U.S. and cease pending litigation. Mexico also said it would set up measures to stop unfair trade practices in the aluminum and steel markets and to monitor trade of the metals in North America.[17]

Along with the deal with Canada and Mexico, President Trump also postponed a decision on whether to impose tariffs on automobiles imported from Europe, Japan and other countries for six months.[67]

Chinese products
Main article: China–United States trade war
U.S. trade deficit (in billions, goods only) by country in 2014
U.S. trade deficit (in billions, goods and services) by country in 2017

On March 22, 2018, Trump signed a memorandum under the Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, instructing the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to apply tariffs of $50 billion on Chinese goods. Trump said the tariffs would be imposed due to Chinese theft of U.S intellectual property.[118] Trump said his planned tariffs on Chinese imports would make the United States "a much stronger, much richer nation".[119] However, the steps toward imposing the tariffs led to increased concerns of a global trade war.[118]

The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 724 points, or 2.9%, after the tariffs were announced due to concerns over a trade war.[120] Corporations that traded with China, such as Caterpillar Inc.and Boeing, suffered large losses in their stock price.[121]

In response, the Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China announced plans to implement its own tariffs on 128 U.S. products. 120 of those products, such as fruit and wine, will be taxed at a 15% duty while the remaining eight products, including pork, will receive a 25% tariff.[122][123] China implemented their tariffs on April 2, 2018.[124][125]

On April 3, 2018, the U.S. Trade Representative's office published an initial list of 1,300+ Chinese goods to impose levies upon, including products like flat-screen televisions, weapons, satellites, medical devices, aircraft parts and batteries.[126][127][128] Chinese Ambassador Cui Tiankai responded by warning the U.S. that they may fight back, saying "We have done the utmost to avoid this kind of situation, but if the other side makes the wrong choice, then we have no alternative but to fight back."[129]

On April 4, 2018, China's Customs Tariff Commission of the State Council decided to announce a plan of additional tariffs of 25% on 106 items of products including automobiles, airplanes, and soybeans.[130] Soybeans are the top U.S. agricultural export to China.[131][132]

The increased tit-for-tat tariff announcements stoked fears that the two countries are inching closer to a trade war.[133][134][135] On April 4, 2018, President Trump responded to speculation tweeting: "We are not in a trade war with China, that war was lost many years ago by the foolish, or incompetent, people who represented the U.S. Now we have a Trade Deficit of $500 Billion a year, with Intellectual Property Theft of another $300 Billion. We cannot let this continue!"[136][137] The next day Trump directed the USTR to consider $100 billion in additional tariffs.[138][139]

On May 9, 2018, China cancelled soybean orders exported from United States to China. Zhang Xiaoping, Chinese director for the U.S. Soybean Export Council, said Chinese buyers simply stopped buying from the U.S.[140]

On June 15, Donald Trump released a list of $34 billion of Chinese goods to face a 25% tariff, starting on July 6. Another list with $16 billion of Chinese goods was released, with an implementation date of August 23.[141]

On July 10, the United States Trade Representative, in reaction to China's retaliatory tariffs that took effect July 6, requested comments, gave notice of public hearings and issued a proposed list of Chinese products amounting to an annual trade value of about $200 billion that would be subjected to an additional 10% in duties on top of what those imported articles would normally pay.[142]

In 2018 China ended its domestic ownership rules for auto companies and financial institutions. The rules required that auto companies and financial institutions in China be at least 50 percent owned by Chinese companies. The change was seen as benefitting U.S. auto companies including Tesla.[143][144]

On May 9, 2019, Trump said the tariffs are "paid for mostly by China, by the way, not by us." Economic analysts concluded this was an incorrect assertion as American businesses and consumers ultimately pay the tariffs as real-world examples of tariffs working as intended are rare, and consumers of the tariff-levying country are the primary victims of tariffs, by having to pay higher prices. "It is inaccurate to say that countries pay tariffs on commercial and consumer goods—it is the buyers and sellers that bear the costs," said Ross Burkhart, a Boise State University political scientist. "Purchasers pay the tariff when they buy popular products. Sellers lose market share when their products get priced out of markets," Burkhart added.[145][146][147]

During the June 2019 G20 Osaka summit, China and America agreed to resume stalled trade talks, with Trump announcing he would suspend an additional $300 billion in tariffs that had been under consideration after talks failed the previous month, and asserting China had agreed to buy a "tremendous amount" of American farm products, although there were no specifics or confirmation of this by China. People familiar with the negotiations later said China made no explicit commitment as Trump had described.[148][149][150]

South Korean products
See also: South Korea–United States relations § Economic relations

On March 28, 2018 the United States and South Korea announced major changes to the bilateral United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) in response to the numerous tariffs and the proposed North Korean-United States diplomatic meeting.[151] The 25 percent tariff on South Korean trucks will be extended until 2041, adding twenty years to the current 2021 target phase out date. No South Korean auto manufacturer exports trucks to the United States. The United States exempted South Korea from its steel tariffs, but imposed an import quota of about 2.68 million tonnes.[152][153] South Korea was temporarily exempted from aluminum tariffs as well, but the exemption was removed effective May 1, 2018.[154]

Retaliatory tariffs
Historical average tariff rates (France, UK, U.S.)

China, Canada, and the European Union responded negatively to the initial announcement (which did not mention any temporary exemptions). Canada supplies 16% of U.S. demand for steel, followed by Brazil at 13%, South Korea at 10%,[155] Mexico at 9%, and China at 2%.[112]

Canadian

From 2013 to 2016, Canada was the largest source of aluminum imports to the U.S.[156][157]

Trump invoked national security grounds as justification for imposing tariffs on Canada. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the idea "that Canada could be considered a national security risk to the United States" was "absurd" and "inconceivable" and called the tariffs "totally unacceptable." Trudeau announced $16.6 billion in retaliatory tariffs, saying "American people are not the target ... We hope eventually that common sense will triumph. Unfortunately the actions taken today by the United States government do not appear headed in that direction."[158]

On July 1, 2018, Canada implemented retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports.[9] The value of the Canadian tariffs were set to match the value of the U.S. tariffs dollar-for-dollar and cover 299 U.S. goods, including steel, aluminum, and a variety of other products, including inflatable boats, yogurt, whiskies, candles, and sleeping bags before the tariffs were lifted on May 20, 2019.[10][67]

Chinese
Main article: China–United States trade war

China said it will retaliate for the tariffs imposed on $50 billion of Chinese goods that came into effect on July 6.[12] China threatened to curb imports of U.S. soybeans.[159]

A June 2019 analysis conducted by the Peterson Institute for International Economics found that China had imposed the same 8% average tariffs on all countries in January 2018, but by June 2019 average tariffs on American exports had increased to 20.7% while those on other countries had declined to 6.7%[160]

European

Jean-Claude Juncker, the president of the European Commission, condemned U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs and announced that a legal challenge at the World Trade Organization would follow.[161] The EU filed the WTO challenge against the United States on June 1, once the tariffs took effect.[162]

European Union retaliatory tariffs took effect on June 22, 2018, imposing tariffs on 180 types of products, over $3 billion of U.S. goods. Affected products include steel and aluminum, agricultural goods (including orange juice and cranberry juice), clothing, washing machines, cosmetics, and boats.[163] European Commissioner for Trade Cecilia Malmström stated: "The rules of international trade, which we have developed ... with our American partners, cannot be violated without a reaction from our side. Our response is measured, proportionate and fully in line with WTO rules."[163] Among the U.S. manufacturers affected by the EU's responsive tariffs is Harley-Davidson, which announced that it would move some of their manufacturing out of the United States.[164]

After the World Trade Organization gave the U.S. a green light to impose tariffs because of European subsidies to Airbus, European Commission spokesperson Daniel Rosario threatens retaliatory measures if the United States imposes a US$7.5 billion (€6.823 billion) tariff on products such as olives, whiskey, wine, cheese, yogurt, and airplanes. The tariffs are in addition to those imposed last year and are in effect as of October 18, 2019.[165]

Indian

On June 16, 2019, India imposed retaliatory tariffs on 28 U.S. products, $240 million worth of goods, with some levies reaching 70 percent. Affected products include apples, almonds, walnuts, lentils, and some chemical products; India is the largest buyer of U.S. almonds, paying $543 million for more than half of the imports. It's also the second-largest buyer of U.S. apples, buying $156 million worth in 2018.[8] The tariffs were in response to the U.S.'s refusal to exempt India from higher taxes on steel and aluminum imports and in response to the U.S. withdrawing India from the Generalized System of Preferences on June 5. India had announced retaliatory tariff increases totaling $235 million on U.S. goods in June 2018, but trade talks had delayed their implementation.[166]

Mexican

In response to the imposition of U.S. tariffs, Mexico implemented retaliatory tariffs on around US$3 billion (MXN $58.6 billion) worth of U.S. goods. These Mexican tariffs, which went into effect on June 5, 2018 were imposed on U.S. steel, pork, cheese, whiskey, and apples, among other goods before being lifted on May 20, 2019.[9][167][67]

Proposed

Automobiles

During his presidential campaign, Trump said he would impose tariffs—between 15 and 35%—on companies that moved their operations to Mexico.[39] Trump proposed a 35% tariff on "every car, every truck and every part manufactured in Ford's Mexico plant that comes across the border".[168] Tariffs at that level would be far higher than the international norms (which are around 2.67% for the U.S. and most other advanced economies and under 10% for most developing countries).[169] After the European Union threatened to impose retaliatory tariffs should a tariff on steel and aluminum be imposed, on March 3, 2018 Trump countered with a threat to impose tariffs on European car manufacturers.[170] In May 2019, Trump threatened to impose tariffs of up to 25 percent on automobiles and parts on the basis that a weakening internal U.S. economy constituted a national security threat, but delayed the imposition of the tariffs for six months to allow for trade talks with the European Union and Japan.[171][172][173]

All Mexican imports

On May 30, 2019, Trump unexpectedly announced that he would impose a 5% tariff on all imports from Mexico on June 10, increasing to 10% on July 1, and by another 5% each month for three months, "until such time as illegal migrants coming through Mexico, and into our Country, STOP."[174] Hours later, Republican senator Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, commented, "This is a misuse of presidential tariff authority and counter to congressional intent. Following through on this threat would seriously jeopardize passage of USMCA, a central campaign pledge of President Trump's and what could be a big victory for the country."[175] That same day, the Trump administration formally initiated the process to seek congressional approval of USMCA.[176] Trump's top trade advisor, US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, opposed the new Mexican tariffs on concerns it would jeopardize passage of USMCA.[177] Treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin and Trump senior advisor Jared Kushner also opposed the action. Grassley, whose committee is instrumental in passing USMCA, was not informed in advance of Trump's surprise announcement.[178] An array of lawmakers and business groups expressed consternation about the proposed tariffs.[177][179] With 2018 imports of Mexican goods totaling $346.5 billion, a 5% tariff constitutes a tax increase of over $17 billion.[180]

On the evening of June 7, Trump announced that the planned Mexico tariffs were "indefinitely suspended" after Mexico agreed to take stronger measures to curb immigration across the border of the U.S. According to the deal, Mexico agreed to deploy 6,000 of its National Guard troops throughout the country, with a focus on its southern border with Guatemala. Mexico also agreed to house migrants seeking asylum in the U.S.—including housing, offering jobs, health care and education—while the U.S. agreed to accelerate asylum claims. If the deal does not have the "expected results," then the two nations will meet again in 90 days.[19] Trump also tweeted that Mexico had agreed to "immediately" begin buying agricultural products from U.S. farmers, although the communique between the countries did not mention any such deal and Mexican officials were reportedly not aware of such discussions; American officials declined to comment.[181] The New York Times reported the next day that Mexico had already agreed to most of the actions months prior.[182] On June 9, as critics continued to downplay the significance of the deal, Trump called The New York Times report "false", tweeting "We have been trying to get some of these Border Actions for a long time ... but were not able to get them, or get them in full, until our signed agreement with Mexico." The Times stood by its reporting.[183] Trump also threatened that he could return to using tariffs as a tactic if desired. Mexico's ambassador to the U.S., Martha Bárcena Coqui, addressed Trump's defense of the deal on CBS, saying "There are a lot of details that we discussed during the negotiations ... that we didn't put into the declaration because there are different paths that we have to follow," adding that adjustments will be made as the situation on the border evolves.[184]

Effects

The Trump administration's tariffs were received negatively by the majority of economists and analysts, with general consensus among experts—including U.S. Director of the National Economic Council Larry Kudlow—being that the tariffs either have no direct benefits on the U.S. economy and GDP growth or they have a small to moderately negative impact on the economy.[145][185][186] In a March 2018 Reuters survey, almost 80% of 60 economists believed the tariffs on steel and aluminum imports would be a net harm to the U.S. economy, with the rest believing the tariffs would have little or no effect; none of the economists surveyed believed the tariffs would benefit the U.S. economy.[187] In May 2018, more than 1,000 economists wrote a letter warning Trump about the dangers of pursuing a trade war, arguing that the tariffs were echoing policy errors, such as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, which helped lead to the Great Depression.[188]

Economic

A study published in fall 2019 in the Journal of Economic Perspectives found that by December 2018, Trump's tariffs resulted in a reduction in aggregate U.S. real income of $1.4 billion per month in deadweight losses, and cost U.S. consumers an additional $3.2 billion per month in added tax.[24] The study's authors noted that these were conservative measures of the losses from the tariffs, because they did not take account of the tariffs' effects in reducing the variety of products available to consumers, or the tariff-related costs attributable to policy uncertainty or the fixed costs incurred by companies to reorganize their global supply chains.[24] A study by Federal Reserve Board economists found that the tariffs reduced employment in the American manufacturing sector.[189][190]

An April 2019 working paper by economists found that the tariffs on washing machines caused the prices of washers to increase by approximately twelve percent in the United States.[23] A 2019 paper by Federal Reserve Board economists found that the steel tariffs led to 0.6% fewer jobs in the manufacturing sector than would have happened in the absence of the tariffs; this amounted to approximately 75,000 jobs.[191][192]

In May 2019, analyses from varying organizations were released. A May 2019 Goldman Sachs analysis found that the consumer price index (CPI) for tariffed goods had increased dramatically, compared to a declining CPI for all other core goods.[193] A CNBC analysis that month found that Trump had "enacted tariffs equivalent to one of the largest tax increases in decades," while Tax Foundation and Tax Policy Center analyses found the tariffs could offset the benefits of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 for many households.[20][21][22] The Tax Foundation found that if all existing and proposed tariffs were fully implemented, the benefits of the Trump tax cut would be completely eliminated for all taxpayers through the 90th percentile in earnings.[194] Another May 2019 analysis conducted by the National Taxpayers Union warned that the existing and proposed additional tariffs, if fully implemented, would constitute the largest tax increase of the post-war era.[195] According to an analysis by Peterson Institute for International Economics economists, American businesses and consumers paid more than $900,000 a year for each job that was created or saved as a result of the Trump administration's tariffs on steel and aluminum.[196] The cost for each job saved as a result of the administration's tariffs on washing machines was $815,000.[196]

Analysis conducted by Deutsche Bank estimated that Trump's trade actions had resulted in foregone American stock market capitalization of $5 trillion through May 2019.[197]

Trump announced on August 1, 2019, that he would impose a 10% tariff on $300 billion of Chinese imports beginning September 1; four days later the Chinese Commerce Ministry announced that China was halting imports of all American agricultural goods. American Farm Bureau Federation data showed that agriculture exports to China fell from $19.5 billion in 2017 to $9.1 billion in 2018, a 53% decline.[198] The figure was $21.4 billion in 2016.[199]

A September 2019 Federal Reserve study found that tariffs Trump imposed through mid-2019, combined with the policy uncertainty they created, would reduce the 2020 real GDP growth rate by one percentage point.[200]

A study by four economists published in October 2019 by the Quarterly Journal of Economics estimated that U.S. consumers and firms who buy imports lost $51 billion (0.27% of GDP) as a result of the 2018 tariffs. After accounting for increases in government tariff revenue and gains to U.S. producers, the study authors estimated the aggregate U.S. real income loss to be $7.2 billion (0.04% of GDP).[25] The study found that "retaliatory tariffs resulted in a 9.9% decline in U.S. exports within products."[25] The study also found that workers in heavily Republican counties suffered the most from the trade war, because retaliatory tariffs focused on agricultural products.[25]

Between the time Trump took office in 2017 through March 2019, the U.S.'s trade deficit grew by $119 billion, reaching $621 billion, the highest it had been since 2008.[201] As of January 2020, the Trump administration had imposed tariffs on 16.8% of all goods imported into the U.S. (measured as a share of the value of all U.S. imports in 2017).[202] The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) published its estimate of the U.S. economic impact from Trump's trade policies:

In CBO's estimation, the trade barriers put in place by the United States and its trading partners between January 2018 and January 2020 would reduce real GDP over the projection period. The effects of those barriers on trade flows, prices, and output are projected to peak during the first half of 2020 and then begin to subside. Tariffs are expected to reduce the level of real GDP by roughly 0.5 percent and raise consumer prices by 0.5 percent in 2020. As a result, tariffs are also projected to reduce average real household income by $1,277 (in 2019 dollars) in 2020. CBO expects the effect of trade barriers on output and prices to diminish over time as businesses continue to adjust their supply chains in response to the changes in the international trading environment.[202]

Political

Studies have found that the tariffs also adversely affected Republican candidates in elections.[26][27][28] A study by the University of Warwick's economists found that the tariffs negatively impacted the electorate in districts that swung to Trump (relative to Mitt Romney's 2012 performance), and that as a result of the retaliatory tariffs, Republican candidates fared worse by between 1.4 to 2.7 percentage points in counties in the top decile of the exposure distribution implied by the Chinese, Canadian and Mexican retaliation.[203][204][27] The analysis also found that the retaliatory tariffs implemented by the EU were carefully structured so as to not harm the EU itself, whereas China implemented tariffs that harmed industries both in China and in the U.S.[203][204][27]

The Asian Trade Centre argued that Trump's usage of trade policy as a tactic to push non-trade related political initiatives, particularly his May 2019 threat to levy Mexican imports until they crackdown on illegal immigration, set a negative precedent for future U.S. presidents and damaged the credibility of the U.S. as a reliable trade partner.[205]

gollark: There's that DNS CAA thing which I might set up on osmarks.net; this is somewhat more secure, since in theory only CAs I specify are allowed to issue certificates for it. However, clients (i.e. browsers) are forbidden from verifying it by the relevant standards for some reason, and CAs are just *meant to* check.
gollark: Except you *can't*, because then half the web will break.
gollark: It's done by centralized authorities, and they can also just arbitrarily delegate out that cert-making power.
gollark: Arguably DNS too, but that isn't really its fault.
gollark: Also the entire certificate authority system.

See also

Further reading

References
  1. Gonzales, Richard (January 22, 2018). "Trump Slaps Tariffs On Imported Solar Panels and Washing Machines". NPR.
  2. Horsley, Scott (March 8, 2018). "Trump Formally Orders Tariffs on Steel, Aluminum Imports". NPR.
  3. Long, Heather (May 31, 2018). "Trump has officially put more tariffs on U.S. allies than on China". The Washington Post.
  4. Chance, David (March 5, 2018). "Trump's trade tariffs: Long on rhetoric, short on impact?". Reuters.
  5. https://www.facebook.com/danielle.paquette.58; https://www.facebook.com/emilyrauhala?fref=ts. "As Trump's trade war starts, China retaliates with comparable tariffs of its own". Washington Post. Retrieved July 6, 2018.
  6. "US tariffs a dangerous game, says EU". BBC News. June 1, 2018.
  7. "India moves ahead with tariffs on US goods". CNN. June 17, 2018.
  8. "India imposing increased, retaliatory tariffs on US exports including apples, almonds". USA Today. June 16, 2019.
  9. Kate Rooney, Canada makes retaliatory tariffs official: 'We will not back down', CNBC (June 29, 2018).
  10. Daniel Wolfe, The full list of 229 US products targeted by Canada's retaliatory tariffs, Quartz (June 29, 2018).
  11. Lawder, David. "Trump sets tariffs on $50 billion in Chinese goods; Beijing strikes ..." U.S. Retrieved September 16, 2018.
  12. "Australia vulnerable to 'full-blown trade war' as US-China tension deepens". The Age. June 16, 2018.
  13. Swanson, Ana (May 23, 2019). "Trump Gives Farmers $16 Billion in Aid Amid Prolonged China Trade War". The New York Times.
  14. "Trump wants $12 billion in aid to U.S. farmers suffering from trade war". Reuters. July 25, 2018. Retrieved July 25, 2018.
  15. https://www.wsj.com/articles/trade-war-with-china-took-toll-on-u-s-but-not-big-one-11578832381
  16. "Australia exempted from US tariffs on steel and aluminium". SBS News. Retrieved September 16, 2018.
  17. "US reaches deal to lift steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada and Mexico". CNBC. May 17, 2019.
  18. Karni, Annie; Swanson, Ana (May 30, 2019). "Trump Says U.S. Will Hit Mexico With Tariffs on All Goods". New York Times.
  19. "Trump claims he's reached deal with Mexico". Axios. June 7, 2019. Retrieved June 8, 2019.
  20. Liesman, Steve (May 16, 2019). "Trump's tariffs are equivalent to one of the largest tax increases in decades". CNBC.
  21. Keshner, Andrew. "Trump's escalating trade war with China could wipe out benefits from his tax reform". MarketWatch.
  22. "For Many Households, Trump's Tariffs Could Wipe Out The Benefits of the TCJA". Tax Policy Center. May 14, 2019.
  23. Flaaen, Aaron B; Hortaçsu, Ali; Tintelnot, Felix (2019). "The Production Relocation and Price Effects of U.S. Trade Policy: The Case of Washing Machines". NBER Working Paper Series. doi:10.3386/w25767. Working Paper 25767.
  24. Amiti, Mary; Redding, Stephen J.; Weinstein, David E. (2019). "The Impact of the 2018 Tariffs on Prices and Welfare". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 33 (Fall 2019): 187–210. doi:10.1257/jep.33.4.187.
  25. Fajgelbaum, Pablo D.; Goldberg, Pinelopi K.; Kennedy, Patrick J.; Khandelwal, Amit K. (October 2019). "The Return to Protectionism". The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 135: 1–55. doi:10.1093/qje/qjz036. hdl:10.1093/qje/qjz036.
  26. Blanchard, Emily J; Bown, Chad P; Chor, Davin (2019). "Did Trump's Trade War Impact the 2018 Election?". NBER Working Paper Series. Working Paper 26434.
  27. Schwarz, Carlo; Fetzer, Thiemo (March 8, 2019). "Tariffs and Politics: Evidence from Trump's Trade Wars". Social Science Research Network. SSRN 3349000.
  28. Chyzh, Olga; Urbatsch, Robert (2019). "Bean Counters: The Effect of Soy Tariffs on Change in Republican Vote Share Between the 2016 and 2018 Elections". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  29. Schlesinger, Jacob M. (November 15, 2018). "Trump Forged His Ideas on Trade in the 1980s—And Never Deviated". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved November 15, 2018.
  30. Maggie Haberman. "Donald Trump Says He Favors Big Tariffs on Chinese Exports". The New York Times. Retrieved March 20, 2018.
  31. "Donald Trump Says NAFTA Was the Worst Trade Deal the U.S. Ever Signed". Fortune Magazine. Retrieved March 20, 2018.
  32. "Read Donald Trump's Speech on Trade". Time. Retrieved March 21, 2018.
  33. "Donald Trump vows to cancel Trans-Pacific Partnership as president, puts NAFTA on notice". The Washington Times. Retrieved November 15, 2016.
  34. "TPP's Death Won't Help the American Middle Class". The Atlantic. November 15, 2016. Retrieved January 22, 2017.
  35. "Presidential Memorandum Regarding Withdrawal of the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations and Agreement". Presidential Memoranda. The White House. January 23, 2017. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  36. "Trump executive order pulls out of TPP trade deal". BBC News. Retrieved January 23, 2017. Mr Trump's executive order on TPP is seen as mainly symbolic since the deal was never ratified by a divided US Congress.
  37. Irwin, Neil (January 25, 2017). "What Is Nafta, and How Might Trump Change It?". The New York Times. Retrieved April 5, 2017.
  38. Appelbaum, Binyamin (March 10, 2016). "On Trade, Donald Trump Breaks With 200 Years of Economic Orthodoxy". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  39. Needham, Vicki (July 24, 2016). "Trump suggests leaving WTO over import tax proposal". Retrieved July 24, 2016.
  40. Daly, Michael (August 8, 2015). "Donald Trump Won't Eat Oreos Because They're Too Mexican Now". Daily Beast. Retrieved April 9, 2016.
  41. Schoen, John W. (October 1, 2018). "New Trump trade deal leaves NAFTA largely intact". www.cnbc.com.
  42. "Donald Trump's Contract with the American Voter" (PDF). donaldjtrump.com.
  43. "Here Is What Donald Trump Wants To Do In His First 100 Days". NPR.org. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
  44. "Chipping away at Lighthizer's confirmation". POLITICO. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
  45. "Search Bills in Congress—GovTrack.us". GovTrack.us. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
  46. "Trump's talk big, act small White House". Axios. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
  47. Golshan, Tara. "Why Trump Can Raise Tariffs Without Congress". Retrieved June 8, 2018.
  48. Partington, Richard (June 19, 2018). "Why is Donald Trump threatening more tariffs—and what next?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved December 23, 2018.
  49. "Why the trade deficit is getting bigger—despite all of Trump's promises". The Washington Post. 2018.
  50. Tankersley, Jim (November 29, 2018). "How Tariffs Work, and Why China Won't See a Bill". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 23, 2018.
  51. "AP FACT CHECK: Economists say Trump off on tariffs' impact". Boston.com. December 5, 2018. Retrieved December 23, 2018.
  52. Golshan, Tara (March 8, 2018). "Why Trump can raise steel tariffs without Congress". Vox.
  53. Gerard N. Magliocca: If the Chamber of Commerce is listening ... Balkinization, 31 May 2019
  54. Eckhouse, Brian; Natter, Ari; Martin, Christopher (January 23, 2018). "President Trump Slaps Tariffs on Solar Panels in Major Blow to Renewable Energy". Time Magazine. Retrieved January 23, 2018.
  55. DiChristopher, Tom (January 23, 2018). "Trump's solar tariffs could put the brakes on rapid job growth in renewable energy". CNBC. Retrieved January 23, 2018.
  56. "President Trump Approves Relief for U.S. Washing Machine and Solar Cell Manufacturers" (Press release). Office of the United States Trade Representative. January 2018.
  57. "China blasts Trump's new trade tariffs". CNNMoney. January 23, 2018. Retrieved January 23, 2018.
  58. Swanson, Ana; Plumer, Brad (2018). "Trump Slaps Steep Tariffs on Foreign Washing Machines and Solar Products". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  59. "Large Residential Washers: Investigation No. TA-201-076" (PDF). usitc.gov. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  60. Kline, Daniel B. "Trump Tariffs: Is Now the Time to Buy a Washing Machine?". The Motley Fool. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  61. Gillespie, Patrick. "Washing machines are going to get more expensive". CNNMoney. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  62. "Trump declares his trade war: targets steel, aluminum". Axios. Retrieved March 1, 2018.
  63. Damian Paletta, Trump insists 'trade wars are good, and easy to win' after vowing new tariffs, Washington Post (March 2, 2018).
  64. Jim Brunsden and Shawn Donnan, US grants last-minute exemptions to looming steel tariffs, Financial Times (March 22, 2018).
  65. "Trump imposes steel and aluminum tariffs on the E.U., Canada and Mexico". Washington Post. May 31, 2018.
  66. Lynch, David J. "Trump imposes tariffs on closest allies; Mexico and Europe announce retaliation". chicagotribune.com. Retrieved May 31, 2018.
  67. "Trump Lifts Metal Tariffs and Delays Auto Levies, Limiting Global Trade Fight". New York Times. May 17, 2019.
  68. Swanson, Ana; Casado, Letícia (December 21, 2019). "Trump Backs Down From Threat to Place Tariffs on Brazilian Steel" – via NYTimes.com.
  69. "Roy Green: The first shots of a broad international trade war?".
  70. Song Jung-a (March 26, 2018). "South Korea secures US steel tariff exemption". Financial Times. Retrieved May 12, 2019.
  71. "Subscribe to The Australian—Newspaper home delivery, website, iPad, iPhone & Android apps". www.theaustralian.com.au. May 2018.
  72. 1943-, Woodward, Bob (September 11, 2018). Fear : Trump in the White House (First Simon & Schuster hardcover ed.). New York. p. 249. ISBN 9781501175510. OCLC 1046982157.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  73. Daniel Gallas(analysis). "Trump to 'restore' tariffs on steel from Brazil and Argentina". BBC. Retrieved December 2, 2019.
  74. Shannon Togawa Mercer & Matthew Kahn, America Trades Down: The Legal Consequences of President Trump's Tariffs, Lawfare (March 13, 2018).
  75. Tom Miles, Trump's extraordinary tariffs, Reuters (March 5, 2018).
  76. "China initiates WTO dispute complaint against US tariffs on steel, aluminium products". www.wto.org. April 9, 2018.
  77. Rankin, Jennifer (June 1, 2018). "EU opens WTO case against Trump's steel and aluminium tariffs". the Guardian. Retrieved June 2, 2018.
  78. Trump, Donald J. [@realDonaldTrump] (June 9, 2018). "PM Justin Trudeau of Canada acted so meek and mild during our @G7 meetings only to give a news conference after I left saying that, "US Tariffs were kind of insulting" and he "will not be pushed around." Very dishonest & weak. Our Tariffs are in response to his of 270% on dairy!" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  79. Sanchez, Luis (June 9, 2018). "Trump rips 'meek and mild' Trudeau for criticizing US tariffs". The Hill. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
  80. Chait, Jonathan. "Trump Confesses Illegal Motive, Blows Up Legal Basis for His Trade War". New York. Retrieved June 11, 2018.
  81. Krugman, Paul; Wells, Robin (2005). Microeconomics. Worth. ISBN 0-7167-5229-8.
  82. "Steel and Aluminum Tariffs". www.igmchicago.org. Retrieved March 12, 2018.
  83. "President Donald Trump wants tariffs on steel and aluminium". The Economist. Retrieved March 9, 2018.
  84. "Will Steel Tariffs Put U.S. Jobs at Risk? | Econofact". Econofact. February 26, 2018. Retrieved March 9, 2018. ... because steel is an input into so many other products, the measures more likely will trade off jobs saved in steel industry against job losses in other manufacturing industries. The losses could be substantial because the number of jobs in U.S. industries that use steel or inputs made of steel outnumber the number of jobs involved in the production of steel by roughly 80 to 1.
  85. Irwin, Neil (March 1, 2018). "The Real Risks of Trump's Steel and Aluminum Tariffs". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 9, 2018.
  86. Kitroeff, Natalie; Swanson, Ana (March 3, 2018). "Trump's Tariff Plan Leaves Blue-Collar Winners and Losers". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 9, 2018.
  87. "Struggling US steel mills fear hammer blow to jobs". Financial Times. Retrieved March 9, 2018.
  88. Timmons, Heather (March 5, 2018). "Five US jobs will be lost for every new one created by Trump's steel tariffs". Quartz (publication). Retrieved March 7, 2018.
  89. Lynch, David J.; Dewey, Caitlin (March 2, 2018). "Trump finally gets his tariffs—and much of the world recoils". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved March 9, 2018.
  90. the rationales are named in Trump's Presidential proclamation (www.whitehouse.gov)
  91. Bown, Chad P. (March 1, 2018). "Analysis | Trump has announced massive aluminum and steel tariffs. Here are five things you need to know". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved March 9, 2018.
  92. Goodman, Peter S. (March 23, 2018). "Trump Just Pushed the World Trade Organization Toward Irrelevance". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 23, 2018.
  93. "Donald Trump, Steel Tariffs, and the Costs of Chaos". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved March 9, 2018.
  94. Bown, Chad P. (March 9, 2018). "What We Do and Don't Know After Trump's Tariff Announcement". Harvard Business Review. Retrieved March 9, 2018.
  95. Pete Schroeder, Forty-five U.S. trade groups urge Trump to avoid tariffs against China, Reuters (March 18, 2018).
  96. Lucas, Amelia (July 11, 2018). "National Retail Federation CEO says Trump's tariffs 'aren't going to work,' will raise prices". CNBC. Retrieved September 12, 2018.
  97. Thomas, Lauren (April 4, 2018). "Trump tariffs on appliances, electronics will hit American consumers, retailers warn". CNBC. Retrieved September 12, 2018.
  98. "Terms of Service Violation". www.bloomberg.com. Retrieved September 12, 2018.
  99. "G.M. to Idle Plants and Cut Thousands of Jobs as Sales Slow". New York Times.
  100. "GM Canada president says electric vehicles are the future—but they won't be made in Oshawa". CBC.
  101. "Trump blasts GM plan to cut plants, says he was 'tough' on CEO Mary Barra". USA Today.
  102. "Trump's steel tariffs are earning him cheers from Democrats and unions". Associated Press.
  103. Britzky, Haley (March 1, 2018). "The response to Trump's tariffs, from Congress, businesses, and abroad". Axios.
  104. Berman, Russell (March 6, 2018). "Republicans can't stop Trump's left-wing drift on trade". The Atlantic.
  105. Williams, Joe. "Republican Reaction To Trade Taxes: Fast, Furious, Negative". Roll Call.
  106. Lindsey McPherson, Ryan: Congress Won't Pass Tariff Legislation Trump Wouldn't Sign, Roll Call (June 6, 2018).
  107. Susan Davis, Congressional Republicans Unlikely To Act To Counter Trump On Tariffs, All Things Considered (March 8, 2018).
  108. Parnes, Amie; Carney, Jordain (March 9, 2018). "Dems tread cautiously on Trump's tariffs". The Hill.
  109. Cornwell, Susan (March 2, 2018). "Rust-belt Democrats praise Trump's threatened metals tariffs". Reuters.
  110. Decker, Cathleen (March 6, 2018). "Republican congressional leaders push Trump to cancel or narrow his tariff plan, but president appears unmoved". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  111. "Pelosi Statement on President Trump's Steel & Aluminum Tariffs". Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi. March 8, 2018. Retrieved March 21, 2018.
  112. Schlesinger, Jacob M.; Nicholas, Peter; Radnofsky, Louise (March 2, 2018). "Trump to Impose Steep Aluminum and Steel Tariffs". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved March 3, 2018.
  113. Palmer, Doug (March 7, 2018). "Why steel tariffs failed when Bush was president". Politico. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  114. Mangan, Dan; Pramuk, Jacob (March 6, 2018). "Gary Cohn resigns as Trump's top economic advisor". CNBC. Retrieved March 6, 2018.
  115. "U.S. Voters Oppose Steel, Aluminum Tariffs". Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. March 7, 2018. Retrieved March 7, 2018.
  116. "Over 600 U.S. companies urge Trump to resolve trade dispute with ..." Reuters. June 13, 2019.
  117. https://tariffshurt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/THH-China-Tariffs-Company-Association-Letter-to-President-Trump-061319_Final.pdf
  118. Diamond, Jeremy. "Trump hits China with tariffs, heightening concerns of global trade war". CNN. Retrieved March 22, 2018.
  119. "Trump takes 1st step on tariffs on Chinese imports, says penalties will make US 'a much stronger, much richer nation'". CNBC. March 22, 2018. Retrieved March 23, 2018.
  120. Egan, Matt (March 22, 2018). "Dow plunges 724 points as trade war fears rock Wall Street". CNN Money. Retrieved March 23, 2018.
  121. "Stocks dive as sanctions on China fuel trade-war fears; Dow drops 700-plus points". Los Angeles Times. March 22, 2018. Retrieved March 23, 2018.
  122. "All 128 U.S. Products China Is Enacting Tariffs On". Fortune. April 2, 2018.
  123. "China Slaps Tariffs on 128 U.S. Products, Including Wine, Pork and Pipes". New York Times. April 1, 2018.
  124. Merelli, Annalisa. "China tariffs: The complete list of 128 affected good class of goods—Quartz". qz.com. Retrieved April 3, 2018.
  125. Kuo, Lily (April 2, 2018). "China retaliates against Trump tariffs with levy on US food imports". the Guardian. Retrieved April 3, 2018.
  126. hermesauto (April 4, 2018). "US publishes list of 1,300 Chinese goods worth US$50b set to be targeted by tariffs". The Straits Times. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  127. Swanson, Ana (April 3, 2018). "White House Unveils Tariffs on 1,300 Chinese Products". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  128. Office of the United States Trade Representative (April 3, 2018). "Notice of Determination and Request for Public Comment Concerning Proposed Determination of Action Pursuant to Section 301: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation" (PDF). ustr.gov.
  129. Tan, Huileng; Mody, Seema (April 4, 2018). "China's ambassador to the US explains why the country is striking back". CNBC. Retrieved May 12, 2019.
  130. "China imposes additional tariffs on U.S. products worth 50 bln USD". www.xinhuanet.com. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  131. "As China Fires Back in Trade War, Here Are the Winners And Losers". Bloomberg.com. April 4, 2018. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  132. Rauhala, Emily (April 4, 2018). "China fires back at Trump with the threat of tariffs on 106 U.S. products, including soybeans". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  133. Maegan Vazquez; Abby Phillip. "Trump pushes back against market fears of trade war". CNN. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  134. Tobey, John S. "The Trade War Is Here—Prepare For A Bear Market". Forbes. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  135. Noack, Rick (April 4, 2018). "Analysis | How trade wars end and why Trump's will be different". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  136. "Donald J. Trump on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  137. Sheetz, Michael (April 4, 2018). "Trump: 'We are not in a trade war with China, that war was lost many years ago'". CNBC. Retrieved August 27, 2019.
  138. Aiello, Chloe (April 5, 2018). "Trump proposes $100 billion in additional tariffs on Chinese products". CNBC. Retrieved April 6, 2018.
  139. "Trump Escalates Trade Tensions With Call for New China Tariffs". Bloomberg.com. April 5, 2018. Retrieved April 6, 2018.
  140. "Facing threat of tariffs, China buyers cancel orders for U.S. soybeans". PBS NewsHour. Retrieved May 31, 2018.
  141. Business, P. M. N. (June 15, 2018). "Trump's tariffs: What they are and how China is responding—Financial Post".
  142. "Statement By U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer on Section 301 Action | United States Trade Representative". ustr.gov. Retrieved July 12, 2018.
  143. "Huge Break for Auto Companies as China Removes Ownership Caps". IndustryWeek. April 17, 2018.
  144. Clover, Charles; Feng, Emily; Sherry Fei Ju (April 17, 2018). "China makes trade concession to US by opening car industry to foreigners". Financial Times. Retrieved May 12, 2019.
  145. "Who pays for US tariffs on Chinese goods? You do". Politifact. May 14, 2019. Retrieved May 18, 2019.
  146. Trump, Donald J. (November 29, 2018). "Billions of Dollars are pouring into the coffers of the U.S.A. because of the Tariffs being charged to China, and there is a long way to go. If companies don't want to pay Tariffs, build in the U.S.A. Otherwise, lets just make our Country richer than ever before!".
  147. Bryan, Bob (January 3, 2019). "Trump says the Treasury is taking in 'MANY billions of dollars' from the tariffs on China. The only problem is that US companies are paying the price". Business Insider. Retrieved May 12, 2019.
  148. Baker, Peter; Bradsher, Keith (June 29, 2019). "Trump and Xi Agree to Restart Trade Talks, Avoiding Escalation in Tariff War". New York Times.
  149. Rappeport, Alan; Bradsher, Keith (June 30, 2019). "The U.S. and China Are Talking Trade Again. But They're Still Far Apart". New York Times.
  150. Swanson, Ana; Bradsher, Keith (July 10, 2019). "China and U.S. Differ Over Agricultural Purchases Trump Boasted About". New York Times.
  151. "President Donald J. Trump is Fulfilling His Promise on The U.S.–Korea Free Trade Agreement and on National Security". The White House. Retrieved March 28, 2018.
  152. "US exempts South Korea from steel tariffs, but imposes import quota". CNBC. March 25, 2018. Retrieved March 28, 2018.
  153. Shear, Michael D.; Rappeport, Alan (March 27, 2018). "Trump Secures Trade Deal With South Korea Ahead of Nuclear Talks". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 28, 2018.
  154. "83 FR 25849—ADJUSTING IMPORTS OF ALUMINUM INTO THE UNITED STATES" (PDF). Retrieved September 11, 2018.
  155. see also Economy of South Korea#Trade statistics
  156. Wang, Christine (March 1, 2018). "Canada, European Union pledge countermeasures against US steel, aluminum tariffs". CNBC. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  157. Jacobs, Jennifer; Deaux, Joe (March 1, 2018). "Trump Expected to Announce Stiff Steel, Aluminum Tariffs". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  158. Spangler, Todd. "Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau slams Trump on tariffs". Detroit Free Press. Retrieved June 1, 2018.
  159. Holland, Steve; Gibson, Ginger (March 2, 2018). "Trump to impose steep tariffs on steel, aluminum; stokes trade war fears". Reuters. Retrieved May 12, 2019.
  160. "China Is Raising Tariffs on the United States and Lowering Them for Everybody Else". PIIE. June 24, 2019.
  161. "European Commission responds to the US restrictions on steel and aluminium affecting the EU" (Press release). European Commission. March 1, 2018.
  162. Emre Peker, European Union Launches WTO Challenge to U.S. Tariffs, Wall Street Journal (June 1, 2018).
  163. Shannon Van Sant & Bill Chappell, EU Tariffs Take Effect, Retaliating For Trump's Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum, NPR (June 22, 2018).
  164. Rappeport, Alan (June 25, 2018). "Harley-Davidson, Blaming E.U. Tariffs, Will Move Some Production Out of U.S." New York Times. Retrieved May 12, 2019.
  165. N/A (October 18, 2019), "US Airbus row: European goods hit by new US tariffs", BBC, retrieved February 20, 2019
  166. "Trump trade war: India announces tariffs on U.S. products". Axios. June 16, 2019.
  167. Ana Swanson & Jim Tankersley, Mexico, Hitting Back, Imposes Tariffs on $3 Billion Worth of U.S. Goods, New York Times (June 5, 2018).
  168. Lane, Charles (October 21, 2015). "Donald Trump's contempt for the free market". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  169. Rosenfeld, Everett (March 10, 2016). "Trump trade plan is dangerous: Economists". CNBC. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  170. Trump, Donald J. (March 3, 2018). "If the E.U. wants to further increase their already massive tariffs and barriers on U.S. companies doing business there, we will simply apply a Tax on their Cars which freely pour into the U.S. They make it impossible for our cars (and more) to sell there. Big trade imbalance!". @realDonaldTrump. Retrieved March 3, 2018.
  171. Byrd, Analysis by Haley. "Trump says foreign cars are a national security threat. Will Congress stop him in before it's too late?". CNN. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
  172. "Trump declares some auto imports pose national security threat". Reuters. May 18, 2019. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
  173. "Why the Trump administration is going after auto imports: Asian Trade Centre". www.cnbc.com. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
  174. Karni, Annie; Swanson, Ana; Shear, Michael D. (May 30, 2019). "Trump Says U.S. Will Hit Mexico With 5% Tariffs on All Goods". New York Times.
  175. "Trump says U.S. to impose five percent tariff on all Mexican imports beginning June 10 in dramatic escalation of border clash". Washington Post.
  176. "Trump Pushes USMCA Approval Plan in Move That Irks Pelosi". www.bloomberg.com.
  177. Salama, Vivian; Mauldin, William; Lucey, Catherine (June 1, 2019). "Trump's Threat of Tariffs on Mexico Prompts Outcry". New York Times.
  178. "Trump defies close advisers in deciding to threaten Mexico with disruptive tariffs". Washington Post.
  179. Swanson, Ana (May 31, 2019). "Trump's Tariff Threat Sends Mexico, Lawmakers and Businesses Scrambling". New York Times.
  180. Karni, Annie; Swanson, Ana; Shear, Michael D. (May 30, 2019). "Trump Says U.S. Will Hit Mexico With 5% Tariffs on All Goods". New York Times.
  181. "Mexico Never Agreed to Farm Deal With U.S., Contradicting Trump". Bloomberg News. June 7, 2019.
  182. Shear, Michael D.; Haberman, Maggie (June 8, 2019). "Mexico Agreed to Take Border Actions Months Before Trump Announced Tariff Deal". New York Times.
  183. Baker, Peter (June 9, 2019). "Trump, Attacking Times Article, Claims Mexico Deal Has Secret Provisions". New York Times.
  184. "Trump says there's more in Mexico deal but doesn't say what". Politico. June 9, 2019.
  185. Farley, Robert (May 14, 2019). "Economists: Tariffs Not Boosting GDP". FactCheck.org. Annenberg Public Policy Center.
  186. Congressional Research Service, Trump Administration Tariff Actions: Frequently Asked Questions, February 2019: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R45529.pdf
  187. Sarkar, Shrutee (March 13, 2018). "Economists united: Trump tariffs won't help the economy". Reuters.
  188. Rushe, Dominic (May 3, 2018). "More than 1,000 economists warn Trump his trade views echo 1930s errors". The Guardian.
  189. Robb, Greg. "Fed study finds Trump tariffs backfired". MarketWatch.
  190. "Disentangling the Effects of the 2018-2019 Tariffs on a Globally Connected U.S. Manufacturing Sector" (PDF). 2019.
  191. "Steel Tariffs and U.S. Jobs Revisited | Econofact". February 6, 2020. Retrieved February 12, 2020.
  192. "Disentangling the Effects of the 2018-2019 Tariffs on a Globally Connected U.S. Manufacturing Sector".
  193. Fitzgerald, Maggie (May 13, 2019). "This chart from Goldman Sachs shows tariffs are raising prices for consumers and it could get worse". CNBC.
  194. Tankersley, Jim (June 3, 2019). "Trump's Tariffs Could Nullify Tax Cut, Clouding Economic Picture". New York Times.
  195. "The Escalating Toll of Trump's Taxes on Trade". National Taxpayers Union.
  196. Long, Heather (2019). "Trump's steel tariffs cost U.S. consumers $900,000 for every job created, experts say". The Washington Post.
  197. Fitzgerald, Maggie (May 31, 2019). "Trump's trade wars have cost the stock market $5 trillion and counting: Deutsche Bank". CNBC.
  198. "U.S. farmers suffer 'body blow' as China slams door on farm purchases". Reuters. August 5, 2019.
  199. "Infographic: U.S. Agricultural Exports to China, 2016". Foreign Agricultural Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
  200. Russ, Katheryn (December 16, 2019). "What Unilateralism Means for the Future of the U.S. Economy" – via hbr.org.
  201. Zarroli, Jim (March 6, 2019). "Despite Trump's Promises, The Trade Deficit Is Only Getting Wider". NPR.
  202. "The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2020 to 2030". Congressional Budget Office. January 2020.
  203. "Why you should never start a trade war with an autocracy". The Economist. April 27, 2019. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved April 28, 2019.
  204. Fetzer, Thiemo; Schwarz, Carlo (April 23, 2019). "Tariffs and politics: Evidence from Trump's trade wars". VoxEU.org. Retrieved April 28, 2019.
  205. "Mexico Solved? Not So Fast ... Significant Damage Remains". Asian Trade Centre. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.