American Farm Bureau Federation

The American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF), more commonly known as Farm Bureau Insurance and Farm Bureau Incorporated (FB), is a United States-based insurance company and lobbying group that represents the American agriculture industry, from small family farms to large agricultural corporations. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., the Farm Bureau has affiliates in all 50 states and Puerto Rico.

1935 FDR remarks for the American Farm Bureau Federation on agriculture during the Great Depression
This article is about the lobbying group. For the insurance, fund and annuities financial company, see FBL Financial Group.
American Farm Bureau Federation
FounderJohn Barron
TypeLobbying organization, insurance company
FocusAgriculture
Location
  • Washington D.C.
Area served
United States
MethodLobbying
Key people
Vincent "Zippy" Duvall (President)
Websitewww.fb.org
Farm Bureau office in Pinckney, Michigan

History

The Farm Bureau movement started in 1911 when John Barron, a farmer who graduated from Cornell University, worked as an extension agent in Broome County, New York. He served as a Farm Bureau representative for farmers with the Chamber of Commerce of Binghamton, New York. The effort was financed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Lackawanna Railroad. The Broome County Farm Bureau was soon separated from the Chamber of Commerce. Other farm bureaus later formed in counties across the U.S., as listed with dates at "List of Farm Bureaus".

In 1914, with the passage of the Smith–Lever Act of 1914, the U.S. Congress agreed to share with the states the cost of programs for providing "county agents", who supplied information to farmers on improved methods of animal husbandry and crop production developed by agricultural colleges and experiment stations, which has evolved into the modern-day Cooperative Extension Service.

In 1915, farmers meeting in Saline County, Missouri, formed the first statewide Farm Bureau.

The initial local and state farm bureaus (1910s-1940s) had a social and educational function furthering the extension service efforts, and they also pursued the functions of pooled negotiating power for purchasing of supplies like seed and equipment (comparable in that respect to farm co-ops, but with potential for larger/wider unification) and pooled capability to provide fire insurance and vehicle insurance for their farms, via both negotiating power (in group purchasing of insurance) and self-insuring capability (in forming new insurance companies of their own); they were comparable in that respect to mutual insurance companies (and indeed founded various such companies). In all of these functions, local and state farm bureaus thus became the closest thing to either a farmers' union or a trade association for farmers that existed in the United States outside of small co-ops. More precisely, they formed a network of such unions or associations with a national parent organization, somewhat analogous in that respect to a federation of trade unions such as the AFL–CIO; but with individual family farms being self-employed, the parallel with trade associations is more relevant.

They have since developed a lobbying presence as well.

In 1919, a group of farmers from 30 states gathered in Chicago. They founded the American Farm Bureau Federation with the goal of "speaking for themselves through their own national organization".[1] Its initial organization papers said:

The purpose of Farm Bureau is to make the business of farming more profitable, and the community a better place to live. Farm Bureau should provide an organization in which members may secure the benefits of unified efforts in a way that could never be accomplished through individual effort.

— The statement originally approved by Farm Bureau members in 1920.[1]

In 2003, the Farm Bureau moved its headquarters from Park Ridge, Illinois, to Washington, D.C.

Lobbying

A 2012 exposé published by The Nation detailed the political operations of the Farm Bureau, including its extensive lobbying for industrial agricultural corporations:[2]

In rural areas, the Farm Bureau grooms compliant political candidates, mostly Republicans; it wields the power to dictate outcomes of legislative elections and appointments to powerful state agriculture committees. Then it influences which farm-related bills become law. Along the way, it has become a close second to Monsanto in lobby expenditures for agriculture-related issues, spending nearly $6 million in 2011—all in the name of "farmers."

According to the article, the Farm Bureau retains 22 registered lobbyists. In 2012, it was the top contributor to federal candidates, parties, and outside groups with payments of over $1 million, with 62% to Republicans. Over the past decade, the Farm Bureau spent $16 million, which was 45% of the total amount spent by the ten largest agribusiness interests in the U.S.[2]

The Farm Bureau supported the Fighting Hunger Incentive Act of 2014 (H.R. 4719; 113th Congress), a bill that would amend the Internal Revenue Code to permanently extend and expand certain expired provisions that provided an enhanced tax deduction for businesses that donated their food inventory to charitable organizations.[3] Farm Bureau argued that without the tax write-off, "it is cheaper in most cases for these types of businesses to throw their food away than it is to donate the food".[4]

Climate change

The Farm Bureau has long opposed regulation or taxation of greenhouse gases and climate policy that it says would decrease the competitiveness of American agriculture, especially while farmers and businesses of other nations remain unburdened by emission limitations. The Farm Bureau's opposition to climate change-related regulation began with cap-and-trade regulation measures, which the Farm Bureau argued would increase fuel and fertilizer prices for farmers. At that time, the Farm Bureau's official position was that "there is no generally agreed upon scientific assessment of the exact impact or extent of carbon emissions from human activities, their impact on past decades of warming or how they will affect future climate changes". In 2003, Farm Bureau economists joined the Heartland and Hudson Institutes in publishing a paper that "called state or federal regulation of greenhouse gases 'unnecessary, enormously expensive, and particularly injurious to the agricultural community.'"[5]

The climate change session at the Farm Bureau's 2010 national meeting was entitled "Global Warming: A Red Hot Lie?" and featured climate change denier Christopher C. Horner,[6] a lawyer for the libertarian Competitive Enterprise Institute, a largely industry-backed group that strongly opposes limits on greenhouse gases.[7] At the meeting, delegates unanimously approved a resolution that "strongly supports any legislative action that would suspend EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act".[8] Right before the meeting, the Union of Concerned Scientists sent the group a letter pointing out that its climate change position runs counter to that of every major scientific organization and urged it to support action on climate change. U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said that farmers have more to gain from cap and trade than they stand to lose.[8]

By 2019, the Farm Bureau had ceased to publicly deny climate change, but remains opposed to non-market-based solutions. It continues to argue that carbon and emission restrictions will raise the costs of energy and fertilizer and hamper the competitiveness of American farmers. It opposes taxes on carbon uses or emissions, any law or regulation requiring the reporting of any GHG emissions by an agricultural entity, any regulation of GHG by the EPA, and any attempt to regulate methane emissions from livestock.[9]

Medicaid

In Missouri, the Missouri Farm Bureau came out publicly against Missouri 2020 Constitutional Amendment 2.[10] This amendment expands Medicaid eligibility to individuals age 19 to 64 with incomes below 133-138% of the poverty level starting in July 2021.[11] (Individuals older and younger than this from low-income households were, in some cases, already eligible for Missouri Medicaid.)[12][13] Under the Affordable Care Act, the federal government pays for 90% of the cost of this expansion in eligibility, leaving Missouri to pay for the remaining 10%.[14] Although organizations like the Brown School of Social Work at Washington University in St. Louis projected that the measure would ultimately reduce costs to the state budget based on the results in other states, possibly by over a billion dollars,[15] the Farm Bureau emphasized the estimated $2 billion cost by 2026, of which the state would pay $200 million, saying Missouri "can’t afford to take on this costly Obamacare program." While acknowledging issues with access to healthcare in rural areas (in a state where 12.3% of the rural population are uninsured, compared with 10.1% in urban areas),[16] the Farm Bureau said that access to healthcare should be addressed without "massively expanding government."

Amendment 2 to expand Medicaid in Missouri passed with 53% of the vote on August 4, 2020[17], one day after the Missouri Farm Bureau advised voters to "vote no on Amendment 2". Afterward, the Missouri Farm Bureau issued a statement on August 7, 2020, calling for "a serious conversation about initiative petition reform", saying that the amendment process "encourages irresponsible spending".[18] Missouri's initiative petition process is governed by sections 50 and 51 of Article III of the Missouri Constitution, and by various statutes within Title IX, Chapter 116 of the Missouri Revised Statutes.[19]. Section 51 states that amendments are passed by majority vote and that an initiative "shall not be used for the appropriation of money other than of new revenues created and provided for thereby",[20] while the Farm Bureau argued that "the easy access to the ballot and the requirement that constitutional amendments only need a simple majority to change the state constitution are the equivalent of handing an unlimited line of credit to a majority of the state’s voters." The Farm Bureau described the difficulties for the state's budget amid the Covid-19 pandemic and then stated, "those who want to change the state, for better or worse, will be busy lining up founders and consultants for the next assault on our constitution."

Insurance

In addition to its political lobbying activities, the Farm Bureau is "a multi-billion dollar network of for-profit insurance companies" and the third-largest insurance group in the United States.[2] The Farm Bureau collected $300 million in crop insurance premiums in 2011. Incidentally, the Farm Bureau was heavily involved in lobbying for the 2012 farm bill,[2] which included $9 billion in federal subsidies for crop insurance.[21]

An organization independent of the Farm Bureau called FBL Financial Group based in West Des Moines, Iowa, sells insurance under the brand name Farm Bureau Financial Services. It also uses the Farm Bureau logo.[22]

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company began as an insurance company for members of the Ohio Farm Bureau Federation. It continues to serve as an insurance provider to Farm Bureaus in nine states.[23] Other insurance companies tied to Farm Bureaus include Farm Family Insurance, which serves as an insurance provider to Farm Bureaus in five states, and Country Financial, which serves clients in seventeen states.

The Farm Bureau and its state affiliates also own American Agricultural Insurance Company, a reinsurer, and American Farm Bureau Insurance Services, a crop insurer.

List of Farm Bureaus
Bureau Headquarters Founded Insurance
Alabama Farmers Federation Montgomery, Alabama 1921 Alfa Insurance
Alaska Farm Bureau
Arizona Farm Bureau Gilbert, Arizona FBL Financial Group
Arkansas Farm Bureau Federation Little Rock, Arkansas 1935 Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
California Farm Bureau Federation Sacramento, California 1919 Allied/Nationwide
Colorado Farm Bureau Centennial, Colorado 1919 Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
Connecticut Farm Bureau Wethersfield, Connecticut 1919 Nationwide
Delaware Farm Bureau Camden, Delaware Nationwide
Florida Farm Bureau Gainesville, Florida 1941 Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
Georgia Farm Bureau Federation Macon, Georgia 1937 Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
Hawaii Farm Bureau Federation Honolulu, Hawaii 1948
Idaho Farm Bureau Federation Pocatello, Idaho 1939 Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Idaho

FBL Financial Group

Illinois Farm Bureau Bloomington, Illinois 1916 Country Financial
Indiana Farm Bureau Indianapolis, Indiana 1919 Indiana Farm Bureau Insurance
Iowa Farm Bureau West Des Moines, Iowa 1918 FBL Financial Group
Kansas Farm Bureau Manhattan, Kansas 1919 FBL Financial Group
Kentucky Farm Bureau Louisville, Kentucky 1919 Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
Louisiana Farm Bureau Federation Baton Rouge, Louisiana 1922 Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
Maine Farm Bureau Augusta, Maine 1951 Farm Family
Maryland Farm Bureau Davidsonville, Maryland 1915 Nationwide
Massachusetts Farm Bureau Federation Marlborough, Massachusetts Farm Family
Michigan Farm Bureau Lansing, Michigan 1919 Farm Bureau Insurance of Michigan
Minnesota Farm Bureau St. Paul, Minnesota 1919 FBL Financial Group
Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation Jackson, Mississippi 1922 Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
Missouri Farm Bureau Jefferson City, Missouri 1915 Missouri Farm Bureau Insurance
Montana Farm Bureau Federation Bozeman, Montana 1919 Mountain West Farm Bureau Insurance
FBL Financial Group
Nebraska Farm Bureau Lincoln, Nebraska FBL Financial Group
Nevada Farm Bureau Sparks, Nevada Country Financial
New Hampshire Farm Bureau Federation Concord, New Hampshire Farm Family
New Jersey Farm Bureau Trenton, New Jersey Farm Family
New Mexico Farm & Livestock Bureau Las Cruces, New Mexico FBL Financial Group
New York Farm Bureau Albany, New York 1911 Nationwide
North Carolina Farm Bureau Raleigh, North Carolina 1936 North Carolina Farm Bureau Insurance Group
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
North Dakota Fargo, North Dakota 1942 Nodak Mutual Insurance Company

FBL Financial Group

Ohio Farm Bureau Columbus, Ohio 1919 Nationwide
Oklahoma Farm Bureau Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 1942 Oklahoma Farm Bureau Insurance

FBL Financial Group

Oregon Farm Bureau Salem, Oregon 1932 Country Financial
Pennsylvania Farm Bureau Camp Hill, Pennsylvania Nationwide
Puerto Rico Farm Bureau San Juan, Puerto Rico
Rhode Island Farm Bureau Johnston, Rhode Island Farm Family
South Carolina Farm Bureau Cayce, South Carolina 1944 Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
South Dakota Farm Bureau Huron, South Dakota 1917 FBL Financial Group
Tennessee Farm Bureau Columbia, Tennessee 1921 Tennessee Farmers Insurance Companies
Farm Bureau Health Plans
Texas Farm Bureau Waco, Texas 1933 Texas Farm Bureau Insurance
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
Utah Farm Bureau Sandy, Utah 1916 FBL Financial Group
Vermont Farm Bureau Richmond, Vermont 1915 Nationwide
Virginia Farm Bureau Goochland County, Virginia
(Richmond mailing address)		 Virginia Farm Bureau Insurance
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
Washington State Farm Bureau Lacey, Washington 1920 Country Financial
West Virginia Farm Bureau Buckhannon, West Virginia 1919 Nationwide
Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation Madison, Wisconsin 1919 Rural Mutual Insurance
FBL Financial Group
Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation Laramie, Wyoming 1920 Mountain West Farm Bureau Insurance
FBL Financial Group
gollark: Negligible runtime cost is what people mean by zero cost abstraction mostly.
gollark: I assumed you were mostly complaining about traits taking time for humans to get used to, but sure.
gollark: Oh bees the compile time.
gollark: Also longer compile time.
gollark: Although I suppose you have larger binaries and mildly worse CPU cache use with that.

References
  1. "About Farm Bureau". Delaware County Farm Bureau. Retrieved October 18, 2019.
  2. Shearn, Ian T. (July 16, 2012). "Whose Side Is the American Farm Bureau On?". ISSN 0027-8378. Retrieved October 18, 2019.
  3. "CBO - H.R. 4719". Congressional Budget Office. Retrieved 15 July 2014.
  4. "Fighting Hunger Incentive Act will increase food bank donations". Farm Bureau News. 10 June 2014. Archived from the original on 25 July 2014. Retrieved 16 July 2014.
  5. Gustin, Georgina; Banerjee, Neela; Cushman, John H., Jr. (October 24, 2018). "How the Farm Bureau's Climate Agenda Is Failing Its Farmers". Inside Climate News. Retrieved 2019-09-12.
  6. Winter, Allison (12 January 2010). "Farm Bureau Fires Back Against Climate Bill's 'Power Grab'". New York Times. Retrieved 13 January 2010.
  7. "Challenges to Both Left and Right on Global Warming". The New York Times. 13 November 2007.
  8. Winter, Allison (2010-01-13). "Farm Bureau wants Congress to stop EPA on greenhouse gases". Energy and Environment News. Retrieved 13 January 2010.
  9. "AFBF Policy on Climate Change". American Farm Bureau Federation.
  10. https://mofb.org/amendment-2-not-the-answer-to-missouris-healthcare-problems-2/
  11. https://www.sos.mo.gov/elections/petitions/2020BallotMeasures
  12. https://web.archive.org/web/20200813154706/https://mydss.mo.gov/healthcare/mohealthnet-for-kids
  13. https://web.archive.org/web/20200813154504/https://mydss.mo.gov/healthcare/mo-healthnet-for-seniors
  14. https://news.stlpublicradio.org/health-science-environment/2020-07-23/to-expand-or-not-to-expand-medicaid-missouri-voters-to-decide-in-august
  15. https://brownschool.wustl.edu/News/Pages/Medicaid-Expansion-in-Missouri-Policy-Briefs-and-Discussion-Series.aspx
  16. https://andrewdmartin.wustl.edu/the-case-for-medicaid-expansion-in-missouri/
  17. https://ballotpedia.org/Missouri_Amendment_2,_Medicaid_Expansion_Initiative_(August_2020)
  18. https://mofb.org/amendment-process-encourages-irresponsible-spending/
  19. https://ballotpedia.org/Laws_governing_the_initiative_process_in_Missouri
  20. https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=III++++51&bid=31809&constit=y
  21. Crop Insurance a Boon to Farmers – And Insurers, too, Published June 18, 2012. Archived June 8, 2019.
  22. FBL Financial Group financials, Google Finance, retrieved December 9, 2011.
  23. "New York Farm Bureau and Nationwide Insurance announce Strategic Partnership". New York Farm Bureau. Archived from the original on 2012-01-28.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.