Sputnik (news agency)

Sputnik (Russian pronunciation: [ˈsputnʲɪk]; formerly Voice of Russia and RIA Novosti, naming derived from Russian Спутник) is a Russian state-controlled news agency, news website platform and radio broadcast service. It was established by the Russian government-owned news agency Rossiya Segodnya on 10 November 2014.[1][2] With its headquarters in Moscow, Sputnik says it has regional editorial offices in Washington, D.C., Cairo, Beijing, Paris, Berlin, London, India and Edinburgh. Sputnik describes itself as being focused on global politics and economics and aims for an international audience.[3]

"Radio Sputnik" redirects here. For other uses, see Radio Sputnik (disambiguation).
Not to be confused with Sputnik (search engine).

Sputnik
TypeNews and Media
Country
Russia
AvailabilityWorldwide
Slogan"Telling the Untold"
Owner
Launch date
10 November 2014 (2014-11-10)
Official website
sputniknews.com
Language32 languages[lower-alpha 1]

Sputnik is frequently described as a Russian propaganda outlet.[4][5][6] In 2016, Neil MacFarquhar of The New York Times wrote: "The fundamental purpose of dezinformatsiya, or Russian disinformation, experts said, is to undermine the official version of events — even the very idea that there is a true version of events — and foster a kind of policy paralysis." The Russian government rejects the validity of such assertions.[7] In early 2019, CNN Business reported that Facebook had removed hundreds of pages on its social media platform passing as independent news sites but were actually under the control of Sputnik employees. Sputnik said the move "clearly political in its nature and … practically censorship".[8]

Sputnik operates news websites, featuring reporting and commentary, in 31 languages including English, Spanish, Polish and Serbian[9]. The websites house over 800 hours of radio broadcasting material each day, and its newswire service runs a 24/7 service.[10][11]

Foundation

RIA Novosti was Russia's international news agency until 9 December 2013 when it became known as Rossiya Segodnya.[12][13] Dmitry Kiselev, an anchorman of the Russia-1 channel was appointed to be the first president of the reorganized agency.[14] He soon announced that Margarita Simonyan was to be editor-in-chief. Simonyan told The New York Times in 2017 that she choose Sputnik as the new name "because I thought that’s the only Russian word that has a positive connotation, and the whole world knows it."[15]

Sputnik was launched on 10 November 2014 by Rossiya Segodnya, which is itself funded through RT, owned and operated by the Russian government, and was created via an Executive Order of the President of Russia on 9 December 2013.[1][2] As well as the RIA Novosti news agency, Sputnik replaced the Voice of Russia and the foreign language services of RIA Novosti.[16] RT UK was launched a fortnight earlier. According to its editor-in-chief Dmitry Kiselyov, Sputnik was intended to reach a worldwide audience "tired of aggressive propaganda promoting a unipolar world and who want a different perspective".[9] [16] The station claims it "tells the untold".[7] However, President Vladimir Putin, while visiting the Moscow base of the RT television network in 2013, said the objective behind both the then forthcoming Sputnik agency and RT was to "break the monopoly of the Anglo-Saxon global information streams."[15]

Radio services

Radio Sputnik is the audio service of the Sputnik platform operating in 30 languages "for a total of over 800 hours a day, covering over 130 cities and 34 countries on "FM, DAB/DAB+ (Digital Radio Broadcasting), HD Radio, as well as mobile phones and the Internet."[3] It is available on satellite transponders, including a 24-hour English service audible in North America via the Galaxy-19 satellite. Among the station's presenters are Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert who host the weekly talk show Double Down which concentrates on economics.[17] Another talk show is By Any Means Necessary which is hosted by Eugene Puryear, while liberal talk radio host Thom Hartmann presents his own program which is syndicated on Sputnik each day.

Regarding plans for the U.S. broadcast market, the editor-in-chief of Sputnik U.S. said in a June 2017 interview that there were no immediate plans for expansion into markets beyond Washington, D.C.[18] This came on the heels of a late June 2017 announcement[19][18][20] that Radio Sputnik would sublease Reston, Virginia-licensed translator station W288BS (105.5 FM) from Reston Translator, LLC, which transmits from the WIAD tower in Bethesda, Maryland, and begin broadcasting Sputnik on that signal; the station's reach includes DC proper and the western suburbs in Northern Virginia.[21] From November 2017, Radio Sputnik began to be carried on AM in Washington, D.C., on WZHF 1390 AM. The American owners of the stations were required to register as a foreign agent by the United States Department of Justice.[22][23]

Sputnik is blocked from owning an American radio station outright due to Federal Communications Commission rules against foreign ownership of broadcast assets, as enacted in the Communications Act of 1934. Prior to 1 July 2017, Radio Sputnik (initially as its predecessor) had broadcast in the Washington, D.C., area on WTOP-HD2 (103.5-HD2) since June 2013, if not earlier. W288BS translates Urban One's WKYS (93.9)'s digital HD3 signal for analog broadcasting.[18]

Sputnik distributes its programming to American stations via brokered programming, through agent Arnold Ferolito and his holding company RM Broadcasting, LLC. Its availability in Kansas City, Missouri on stations KCXL[24] and KOJH from the beginning of January 2020 was contentious, especially in the latter case because the station has a jazz-centered community radio format and led to a clash on the radio spectrum.[25]

Coverage of the United States

Trump and Clinton

During the 2016 presidential election campaign, according to former US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul writing in The Washington Post, Sputnik made clear publicly its preference for the then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump over the Democrat's nominee Hillary Clinton.[26][27]

According to a fake news story circulated by Sputnik,[28] President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton created ISIS; the website praised Trump, before he was elected in 2016, for making such an assertion.[27][29] The website published an article entitled “Secret File Confirms Trump Claim: Obama, Hillary ‘Founded ISIS’ to Oust Assad”, while tweets from Sputnik used the hastag #CrookedHillary.[26][27][30] Trump revived another discredited conspiracy theory promoted by Sputnik that Google was suppressing bad news about Clinton.[29][31]

In October 2016, Sputnik improperly cited an article written by Kurt Eichenwald for Newsweek misattributing comments to Hillary Clinton confidante Sidney Blumenthal (who quoted Eichenwald in a non-verified email released by WikiLeaks). Sputnik took down the article.[30][32] Aspects of his story as it related to Trump were disputed at the time,[32][33] Sputnik then put up an article reputedly denying its control by the Kremlin and attacking Newsweek and Eichenwald. He wrote that the Trump campaign emailed reporters a link to the Sputnik article and asked them to follow up on the story.[34] The author of the Sputnik article, Bill Moran, successfully sued Newsweek over his assertion that Eichenwald had used bribery and threats.[35]

Forbes reported that Sputnik International reported fake news and fabricated statements by White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest during the 2016 presidential election.[36] Sputnik falsely reported on 7 December 2016 that Earnest stated sanctions for Russia were on the table related to Syria, falsely quoting Earnest as saying: "There are a number of things that are to be considered, including some of the financial sanctions that the United States can administer in coordination with our allies. I would definitely not rule that out."[36] Forbes analyzed Earnest's White House press briefing from that week, and found the word "sanctions" was never used by the Press Secretary.[36] Russia was discussed in eight instances during the press conference, but never about sanctions.[36] The press conference focused solely on Russian air raids in Syria towards rebels fighting President of Syria Bashar al-Assad in Aleppo.[36]

Lee Stranahan was hired by Sputnik News after his departure from Breitbart News and, according to The Washington Post, he is Sputnik's most visible Trump supporter".[37][38][39][40] In early 2020, at the time of the Impeachment of President Trump, Stanahan stated "the entire impeachment is a lie.”[25] The Washington Post stated that "many Sputnik hosts profess skepticism that Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential election," in contradiction to the assessment of the US intelligence community.[37]

Andrew Feinberg's account

On 26 May 2017, Andrew Feinberg, who had been Sputnik's White House Correspondent since the Trump administration came into office the previous January, announced on Twitter that he would no longer be reporting for the agency.[41][42] He said those in charge were more interested in employing “propagandists” rather than “real journalists”.[43] In one tweet he explained the agency's policy in article's attribution: “The truth is they don't want their reporters to have their own reputations, b/c a lie is easier when it doesn't come with a byline.”[43] He told Erik Wemple of The Washington Post: "It’s the fact that if you don’t have bylines on stories and there’s no one accountable for words, then you can really print whatever you want.[41][42] Sputnik, in a statement to The Washington Post, accused Feinberg of making "false accusations" and expressed the "hope that the fruits of his rich imagination would not create more conspiracy theories around Sputnik."[44]

Feinberg, in discussing his period at Sputnik, said that Sputnik's editors[42] asked him to write stories and ask questions at the White House press conference about the conspiracy theory between the murder of Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich in Washington and the leaking of DNC documents to WikiLeaks. Feinberg wrote of his discomfort as " there was absolutely no factual basis for doing so."[42][43][45] The District of Columbia police believed that Rich had been murdered while being robbed. Feinberg believed that the editors wanted to shift blame for the leaking of the DNC documents from Russian hackers to Rich.[42][41][46] Sputnik News has published articles promoting conspiracy theories about the murder of Seth Rich.[46]

In an interview with Brian Stelter for CNN, Feinberg said that Sputnik management had insisted on approving or dictating questions he would ask at White House press briefings, and wanted him to ask questions to imply that the April 2017 Sarin gas attack in Syria was a hoax: "I was asked to put questions to the White House that framed the issue in such a way that made it seem that the attack didn't happen, that it was staged,"[47] In particular, he was asked to raise at the White House the assertions made by Ted Postol querying Syrian responsibility for the attack. On that occasion, he was not called.[41] Feinberg wrote in a Politico August 2017 article, he had concluded after the request that Sputnik's "mission wasn’t really to report the news as much as it was to push a narrative that would either sow doubts about situations that weren’t flattering to Russia or its allies, or hurt the reputation of the United States and its allies."[42]

Other United States responses

In April 2018, journalist John Stanton, who had been Sputnik's Pentagon Correspondent for roughly two years, published a report highly critical of Sputnik News, Sputnik Radio, and RIA Novosti, declaring that both the organizations were part of a larger Russian Information Warfare Operation. His public findings were part of an insider research effort while at Sputnik on behalf of the US government.[48]

In May 2018, the Public Broadcasting Service's NewsHour website published an article by Elizabeth Flock who reported that Sputnik News and Radio reports "seemed intended to polarize" and "to distract and confuse" after listening to them over a week. On a visit to the station, she discovered "a stranger picture than I anticipated, one in which I began to understand how persuasive disinformation could be."[49] According to Flock, Stanton told her "They mix real with unreal, use dubious sources". It was difficult for him to point to the real problem as it "was like pushing a wet noodle." In other words, establishing what can be labelled disinformation is extremely difficult, she concluded.[49]

Foreign Policy magazine has described Sputnik as a slick and internet-savvy outlet of Kremlin propaganda, which "remixes President Vladimir Putin's brand of revanchist nationalism for an international audience... beating a predictable drum of anti-Western rhetoric."[4]

European coverage and responses

Ben Nimmo, in a paper for the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA), wrote that Sputnik invitations concentrate on a select group of politicians for their east European services, especially those known for their pro-Russian (Tatjana Ždanoka in Latvia) or anti-EU opinions (Janusz Korwin-Mikke in Poland). These two political figures have limited support in their countries; Korwin-Mikke gained slightly more than 3% in Poland's presidential election in May 2015, while Ždanoka is barred from holding public office for her opposition to Latvia's independence from Russia.[5] Sputnik has spread a false claim about Angela Merkel, the chancellor of Germany, who was wrongly said to have posed for a selfie with an ISIS suspect.[50]

In the opinion of Kevin Rothrock, Russia editor for Global Voices, Sputnik "acts as a spoiler to try and disrupt or blur information unfriendly to Russia, such as Russian troops' alleged involvement in the war in Ukraine".[51] Historical comparisons have been made to Pravda, the former official newspaper of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, in particular Sputnik's alleged apologia for Joseph Stalin and denial of the 1932–1933 famine in Ukraine known as the Holodomor.[52]

German journalist and author Michael Thumann describes Sputnik as being part of what he calls Russia's "digital information war against the West".[53] Peter Pomerantsev, in an article for the London Sunday Times, wrote that in the 2017 German elections the Sputnik news agency was negative or neutral about the country's political parties, with the exception of the right-wing nationalist Alternative for Germany (AfD).[54]

Alexander Podrabinek, a Russian journalist who works for Radio France Internationale[55][56] (part of French Government's France Médias Monde) and Radio Liberty[57] (supervised by Broadcasting Board of Governors, an Independent agency of the U.S. Federal government) has accused Sputnik of disseminating Russian state propaganda abroad.[58] In a vote urging for the European Union (EU) to "respond to information warfare by Russia", the European Parliament accused broadcasting channels Sputnik and RT of "information warfare", and placed Russian media organisations alongside terrorist organisations such as the Islamic State. The federal agency of Rossotrudnichestvo and the Russkiy Mir Foundation were also seen as tools for Russian propaganda.[59] According to a study by Masaryk University, Sputnik is one of the major sources of Russian propaganda in the Czech Republic.[60]

In August 2016, Sputnik opened offices in Edinburgh, Scotland,[61] its headquarters in the UK.[62] The agency established its radio studio and bureau in the city.[10] Alexander Mercouris, a British barrister debarred for falsely claiming to have been kidnapped and for attempting bribery, was described in Sputnik coverage as a "London-based expert on international affairs".[63]

A January 2017 report by The Swedish Institute of International Affairs found that a Swedish-language version of Sputnik News website was one of the main tools used by the Russian government to spread false information in Sweden including publicizing documents posted on little-known Swedish and Russian websites which were found to be forgeries.[6][64] According to the report, Sputnik News frequently focused on negative stories about NATO and the EU, consistent with Russia's foreign policy interest of minimizing NATO's role in the Baltic region and keeping Sweden out of NATO.[7][64] A research analysis done by Martin Kragh and Sebestian Asberg at the Swedish Institute of International Affairs, found that Swedish Sputnik focused on depicting Russia as under attack by aggressive Western governments, describing EU as being in "terminal decline", and NATO as a dangerous military threat.[65][66] These efforts were believed to try to change how the public in Sweden viewed its government and the EU.[66] The Swedish-language version ran for a year from April 2015 to spring of 2016, where it was forced to shut down and removed from the internet in that year.[67][65]

In April 2017, Emmanuel Macron's campaign team banned both RT and Sputnik from campaign events. A Macron spokesperson said the two broadcasting outlets showed a "systematic desire to issue fake news and false information".[68] A report claiming the pro-Russian candidate, François Fillon, had returned to the lead prior to the election was the subject of a reprimand from the country's election commission. Sputnik had falsely attributed the result to an opinion poll, whereas the assertion had actually originated from Brand Analytics, a Moscow-based company.[69][70] A few weeks after Macron won the presidential election, President Putin visited the Versailles Palace. During a joint press conference with the Russian leader, Macron himself accused Sputnik and RT of having "produced slanderous countertruths".[71]

In June 2019, it was found that Serbian language outlet of Sputnik has infiltrated a disinformation hub in Bosnia And Herzegovina. These findings were published by internationally recognized fact-checking platform Raskrinkavanje,[72] which wrote reports about Sputnik bias towards spreading disinformation,[73] in a 106-page document.[74]

With the intention of protecting democratic values and to combat Russian disinformation campaigns utilizing RT and Sputnik, the European Union established The East StratCom Task Force in 2015.[75][76][1]

Middle East Coverage

In the Middle East, Russia used Sputnik and RT Arabic to promote its foreign policy goals through "informational warfare".[77] Russia tried to increase its power and presence in the Middle East as well as reduce United States influence in the region, fight terrorism, and establish allies in Syria with Bashir al-Assad.[77]

In April 2017, Sputnik and RT reported little to no information on the Khan Shaykhun chemical attack in Syria.[77] During the attacks, Sputnik and RT did not report on the incident; there was no coverage provided on the survivors or their testimonies, and the history of violence in the area such as massacres, bombings, and chemical attacks that have occurred in the Syrian regime were not recorded.[77] After the massacre, Sputnik and RT widely questioned the cause and the history of the massacre through daily reports; false and missing information was frequently cited as the identities of the claimed "experts" were not shared, and alternative versions of the event were falsely reported as they claimed that the attacks were done by the White Helmets, a Syrian civil volunteer organization.[77] Journalist, Finian Cunningham wrote that the White Helmets were "propaganda conduits for al-Qaeda terror groups" which contributed to the controversy and negative news that the White Helmets faced.[78] Published reports by Sputnik at the time were considered biased and did not consist of reliable sources or experts.[78] These statements were shared by Sputnik and RT throughout social media platforms as well as other news outlets that supported the Syrian regime.[79]

International bans and restrictions

In March 2016, access to Sputnik's online content was blocked by Turkish authorities, as well as denying the Turkish bureau chief Tural Kerimov access to the country. The development is thought to have been in response to comments by the Russian leadership that were critical of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan regarding the Turkish administration's record on human rights and freedom of speech.[80] The website was subsequently unblocked later that same year.[81] In 2018, the agency shut down its website in the Kurdish language without mentioning any particular reason for the decision. Former employees of Sputnik said that the news agency decided to shut it down at Turkey’s request, as part of both anti-Kurdish political movement and pro-Russian politics of Erdoğan.[82]

In July 2019, British Foreign and Commonwealth Office banned both RT and Sputnik from attending the Global Conference for Media Freedom in London for "their active role in spreading disinformation". The Russian Embassy called the decision "direct politically motivated discrimination".[83] European Union External Action East StratCom Task Force and separate fact-checkers have discerned reoccurences of Sputnik and RT publishing false information.[84]

In January 2020, the Estonian offices of Sputnik were closed after police warned its journalists about potential criminal charges. The action taken by the Estonian government was a result of European Union sanctions imposed on Dmitry Kiselyov. Banks in Estonia suspended Sputnik related accounts in October 2019.[85]

Twitter and Facebook

In October 2017, Twitter banned both RT and Sputnik from advertising on their social networking service following the conclusions of the U.S. national intelligence report the previous January that both Sputnik and RT had been used as vehicles for Russia's interference in the 2016 US presidential election.[86] It prompted a stern response from spokeswoman Maria Zakharova of the Russian foreign ministry. It said the ban was a “gross violation” by the United States of the guarantees of free speech. “Retaliatory measures, naturally, will follow,”.[87] In November, Alphabet chairman Eric Schmidt announced that Google will be "deranking" stories from RT and Sputnik in response to "weaponised" content and allegations about election meddling by President Putin's government, provoking claims of censorship from both outlets.[88]

To reduce the spread of disinformation, Facebook and Google implemented fact-checking tools throughout their platforms.[89] In January 2019, Facebook removed 289 pages and 75 accounts that the company said were used by Sputnik for misinformation on Facebook.[90] The removed pages posed as independent news sites in eastern Europe and elsewhere but were actually run by employees at Sputnik. It was another in a series of actions taken by Facebook against Russian disinformation.[8][91] Along with Chinese and other Russian media outlets, Twitter attached a "state-affiliated media" label to Sputnik's account.[92]

Other operations

Wire services

As a news agency, Sputnik maintains the following news wires:[93]

English
  • Sputnik News Service
  • Sputnik News Service: Russia
  • Sputnik News Service: Russia, Ukraine & the Baltics
  • Sputnik Exclusives
  • Sputnik Defense and Space
Spanish
  • Sputnik Nóvosti
  • Sputnik Hispano (news from Spain, Latin America and other Spanish-speaking communities)
  • Sputnik Rusia y CEI (Russia and the CIS)
  • Sputnik Economía (economy)
Chinese
  • Sputnik Chinese News Service
  • Russian-Chinese relations
  • News about Russia
  • International news
Arabic
  • Sputnik Arabic News Service
  • Sputnik Middle East
  • Sputnik Russia in the World
  • Sputnik Telling The Untold (exclusive reports and interviews)
Persian
  • Sputnik Farsi News Service

Online news
List indicator(s)
  • RIA : RIA Novosti previously operated online editions in these languages.
  • VOR : inherited from Voice of Russia's online news service.
  • ru : Sputnik also operates Russian language editions for areas served by these editions.

Apart from wire services, Sputnik also operates online news in following languages:

Sputnik previously operated the following editions, which were later shut down:

Broadcast languages

In 2020, the Sputnik radio had broadcasts in nine languages, including[94]:


gollark: The best one would be `kristtrade` or something.
gollark: if only it had an R.
gollark: ***mwahahaha***
gollark: Using that means that "bows" and "coal" get selected for "wool" but "red wool" doesn't.
gollark: Is there a good alternative for levenstein or whatever distance for minecraft item searching?

See also

Notes
  1. Abkhazian, Arabic, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Belarusian, Brazilian Portuguese, Chinese, Czech, Dari, English, Estonian, French, Georgian, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Kyrgyz, Latvian, Lithuanian, Romanian (Cyrillic), Ossetian, Persian, Polish, Moldovan, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Tajik, Turkish, Uzbek, Vietnamese

References
  1. Missiroli, Antonio; Andersson, Jan Joel; Gaub, Florence; Popescu, Nicu; Wilkins, John-Joseph (2016). "Strategic Communications from the East". Strategic Communications: 7–24.
  2. Pizzi, Michael (9 December 2013). "Putin dissolves RIA Novosti news agency". Al Jazeera America. Retrieved 14 December 2019.
  3. "About Us". Sputnik News. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
  4. Groll, Elias (10 November 2014). "Kremlin's 'Sputnik' Newswire Is the BuzzFeed of Propaganda". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
  5. Nimmo, Ben (January 2016). "Sputnik. Propaganda in a New Orbit: Information Warfare Initiative Paper No. 2". Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA). Retrieved 14 December 2019.
  6. "Report: Russia spread fake news and disinformation in Sweden - Radio Sweden". Sveriges Radio. 9 January 2017. Retrieved 14 December 2019.
  7. MacFarquhar, Neil (28 August 2016). "A Powerful Russian Weapon: The Spread of False Stories". The New York Times. Retrieved 14 December 2019.
  8. O'Sullivan, Donie (17 January 2019). "Facebook takes down anti-NATO pages linked to Russian news agency Sputnik". CNN Business. Retrieved 25 February 2020.
  9. Godzimirski, Jakub M., and Malin Østevik. "How to understand and deal with Russian strategic communication measures?." https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b971/0543074e31d71fb8b3323f4faaa5bfc93d74.pdf
  10. "Russian news agency Sputnik sets up Scottish studio". BBC News. 10 August 2016. Retrieved 14 December 2019.
  11. Hilburn, Matthew. "Russia's New World Broadcast Service is 'Sputnik'". Voice of America News. Retrieved 14 December 2019.
  12. Country profile: Russia – Media, BBC News, last updated 6 March 2012.
  13. "Указ о мерах по повышению эффективности деятельности государственных СМИ". Kremlin.ru. Retrieved 14 December 2019.
  14. "Путин ликвидировал РИА Новости". Lenta. 9 December 2013. Retrieved 14 December 2019.
  15. Rutenberg, Jim (13 September 2017). "RT, Sputnik and Russia's New Theory of War". The New York Times. Retrieved 14 December 2019.
  16. Ennis, Stephen (16 November 2014). "Russia's global media operation under the spotlight". BBC News. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
  17. Double Down, Sputnik, Retrieved: 7 June 2016
  18. "Russian-Funded News Station Replaces Bluegrass on 105.5 FM". 30 June 2017. Archived from the original on 30 June 2017. Retrieved 3 November 2017.(replaced discontinued dcist.com link)
  19. "Good Morning, America! Radio Sputnik Goes Live in FM in Washington DC". sputniknews.com. 30 June 2017. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
  20. "Russian radio takes over local DC station". The Hill. 30 June 2017. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
  21. "FCC licensing data for radio broadcasting station W288BS". fccdata.org. 15 September 2011. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
  22. "A U.S. Station Switched From Bluegrass to Radio Sputnik—and Got Threats From the Feds". 13 December 2017 – via www.bloomberg.com.
  23. Moyer, Justin Wm (1 December 2017). "D.C.'s Russia-funded FM station expands to AM after partners register as foreign agents". The Washington Post.
  24. Vockrodt, Steve (17 January 2020). "Kansas City radio station agrees to broadcast Russian-owned 'propaganda' program". The Kansas City Star. Retrieved 15 February 2020.
  25. MacFarquhar, Neil (13 February 2020). "Playing on Kansas City Radio: Russian Propaganda". The New York Times. Retrieved 15 February 2020.
  26. McFaul, Michael (17 August 2016). "Why Putin wants a Trump victory (so much he might even be trying to help him)". The Washington Post. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
  27. Matthews, Owen (29 August 2016). "How Vladimir Putin Is Using Donald Trump to Advance Russia's Goals". Newsweek. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
  28. Weiss, Michael (15 August 2017) [August 15, 2016]. "The Putin-Trump Mind Meld, A Wondrous Enterprise". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
  29. Applebaum, Anne (28 October 2016). "Why is Trump suddenly talking about World War III?". The Washington Post. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
  30. Hartmann, Margaret (11 October 2016). "Trump Knows 'Nothing About Russia,' He Just Repeats Their Propaganda". New York. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
  31. Corasaniti, Nick (26 September 2016). "Donald Trump Pushes Debunked Theory That Google Suppressed Rival's Bad News". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
  32. Bump, Philip (11 October 2016). "The Trump-Putin link that wasn't". The Washington Post. Retrieved 22 December 2016.
  33. "Russia Was Not Behind Donald Trump's False Blumenthal-Benghazi Claim". Bellingcat. 12 October 2016. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
  34. Eichenwald, Kurt (4 November 2016). "Why Vladimir Putin's Russia is Backing Donald Trump". Newsweek. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
  35. Concha, Joe (24 July 2017). "Newsweek settles with Sputnik writer". The Hill. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
  36. Rapoza, Kenneth (7 December 2016), "Fake News In Russia: 'Obama Threatens Sanctions Due To Russia's Role In Syria'", Forbes, retrieved 10 December 2016
  37. Moyer, Justin Wm (12 July 2017). "From the Kremlin to K Street: Russia-funded radio broadcasts blocks from the White House". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
  38. Dickerson, Caitlin (26 September 2017). "How Fake News Turned a Small Town Upside Down". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 September 2017.
  39. Gray, Rosie. "From Breitbart to Sputnik". The Atlantic. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
  40. Balluck, Kyle (6 April 2017). "Former Breitbart reporter joins Russian propaganda network: 'I'm on the Russian payroll now'". The Hill. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
  41. Wemple, Erik (26 May 2017). "White House correspondent bolts Sputnik over the obvious". The Washington Post. Retrieved 25 February 2020.
  42. Feinberg, Andrew. "My Life at a Russian Propaganda Network". Politico. Retrieved 24 August 2017.
  43. Khan, Shehab (27 May 2017). "Sputnik's White House correspondent quits, claiming they would rather have 'propagandists' than 'real journalists'". The Independent. London. Retrieved 25 February 2020.
  44. Wemple, Erik (30 May 2017). "Sputnik blasts former White House correspondent for 'rich imagination'". The Washington Post. Retrieved 25 February 2020.
  45. Rozsa, Matthew (11 September 2017). "The FBI is looking into Sputnik, the Russia-sponsored propaganda news outlet". Salon. Retrieved 29 February 2020.
  46. Palma, Bethania (25 May 2017). "The Seth Rich Conspiracy Theory". Snopes. Retrieved 29 February 2020.
  47. Wattles, Jackie. "Ex-reporter for Russian news agency Sputnik says he was 'fed' questions".
  48. "Putin's Information Warfare, Open Source Intelligence Operations in Washington, DC" (PDF). Cryptome. Retrieved 10 December 2018.
  49. Flock, Elizabeth (2 May 2018). "After a Week of Russian Propaganda I was Questioning Everything". PBS News Hour. Retrieved 10 December 2018.
  50. Dearden, Lizzie (11 February 2017). "Nato accuses Sputnik News of distributing misinformation as part of 'Kremlin propaganda machine'". The Independent. London. Retrieved 23 March 2020.
  51. Haldevang, Max de. "A Russian state news organization has suddenly become obsessed with UFOs". Retrieved 12 September 2016.
  52. Young, Cathy (31 October 2015). "Russia Denies Stalin's Killer Famine". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 7 March 2017.
  53. Thurman, Michael (9 August 2015). "Und...Action!". Die Zeit (in German). Hamburg. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
  54. Pomerantsev, Peter (9 September 2018). "The Kremlin's conspiracy machine nourishes the narcissist and the disaffected". The Sunday Times. London. Retrieved 26 February 2020. (subscription required)
  55. Davidoff, Victor (13 October 2013). "Soviet Psychiatry Returns". The Moscow Times. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
  56. Judan, Ben (1 October 2009). "Reporter says criticism of Soviets brought threats". The San Diego Union Tribune.
  57. "Автор: Александр Подрабинек" (in Russian). Radio Liberty.
  58. Laetitia, Peron (20 November 2014). "Russia fights Western 'propaganda' as critical media squeezed". Yahoo! News. Agence France-Presse. Retrieved 24 January 2015.
  59. "EU Strategic Communications With A View To Counteracting Propaganda" (PDF). European Parliament. 20 November 2016.
  60. Analýza „prokremelských“ webů: šíří vlnu zloby a půl procenta soucitu (Czech). Mladá fronta DNES. 13 June 2016
  61. Johnston, Neil (11 August 2016). "Kremlin news service opens in Edinburgh". The Times. London. Retrieved 26 February 2020. (subscription required)
  62. Kennedy, Dominic (14 April 2018). "To Edinburgh with love: Moscow's Scottish links". The Times. London. Retrieved 26 February 2020. (subscription required)
  63. Kennedy, Dominic (30 July 2016). "Kremlin sows discord with new weapon at heart of UK". The Times. London. Retrieved 26 February 2020. (subscription required)
  64. Henley, Jon (11 January 2017). "Russia waging information war against Sweden, study finds". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
  65. Kragh, Martin; Åsberg, Sebastian (19 September 2017). "Russia's strategy for influence through public diplomacy and active measures: the Swedish case". Journal of Strategic Studies. 40 (6): 773–816. doi:10.1080/01402390.2016.1273830. ISSN 0140-2390. S2CID 157114426.
  66. Watanabe, Kohei. "Conspiracist propaganda: How Russia promotes anti-establishment sentiment online." ECPR General Conference, Hamburg. 2018. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7a3e/be6eef4da1d31a1f73abd4aa89fc9196743f.pdf
  67. Parfitt, Tom (13 January 2017). "Putin accused of driving a wedge between Sweden and Nato". The Times. London. Retrieved 26 February 2020. (subscription required)
  68. "Emmanuel Macron's campaign team bans Russian news outlets from events". The Guardian. Reuters. 27 April 2017. Retrieved 25 February 2020.
  69. Bremner, Charles (19 April 2017). "Macron is main target of Russian interference". The Times. London. Retrieved 26 February 2020. (subscription required)
  70. Higgins, Andrew (17 April 2017). "It's France's Turn to Worry About Election Meddling by Russia". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
  71. Sage, Adam (30 May 2017). "Macron confronts Putin over lies in Russian media". The Times. London. Retrieved 26 February 2020. (subscription required)
  72. "How Serbian Sputnik Infiltrated a Disinformation Hub in Bosnia And Herzegovina". EU vs DISINFORMATION. 14 June 2019. Retrieved 14 June 2019.
  73. ""Sputnik" o Bosni: Medijski "zastupnik" Milorada Dodika". Raskrinkavanje.ba. Retrieved 14 June 2019.
  74. Tijana Cvjetićanin; Emir Zulejhić; Darko Brkan; Biljana Livančić-Milić. "Disinformation in the online sphere: The case of BiH" (PDF).
  75. Yoldas, Deniz. (2019). EU -Russia Information War, Human Right, and Democracy -Fake news, Fact-checking, Conspiracy Theories and Hate-speech in post-Truth and Illiberal Democracies Age. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Deniz_Yoldas/publication/336148909_EU_-Russia_Information_War_Human_Right_and_Democracy_-Fake_news_Fact-checking_Conspiracy_Theories_and_Hate-speech_in_post-Truth_and_Illiberal_Democracies_Age/links/5d9306d7299bf10cff1cd98a/EU-Russia-Information-War-Human-Right-and-Democracy-Fake-news-Fact-checking-Conspiracy-Theories-and-Hate-speech-in-post-Truth-and-Illiberal-Democracies-Age.pdf
  76. "About". EU vs DISINFORMATION. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
  77. Jensen, Donald N. "11. Russia in the Middle East: A New Front in the Information War?." RUSSIA IN THE (2018): 265. https://jamestown.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Russia-in-the-Middle-East-online.pdf?x75907#page=278
  78. Czuperski, Maksymilian, et al. Disinformation. Atlantic Council, 2017, pp. 54–61, Breaking Aleppo, www.jstor.org/stable/resrep03700.14. Accessed 15 May 2020.
  79. ensen, Donald N. "Russia in the Middle East: A New Front in the Information Was?." https://jamestown.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Don-Jensen-WS2-Media-Tactics.pdf
  80. "Russian state news agency Sputnik says site blocked in Turkey". Reuters. 15 April 2016.
  81. "Turkey lifts ban on Russia's Sputnik news website - LOCAL". Hürriyet Daily News. Istanbul. 8 August 2016. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
  82. "Russian Sputnik shuts down Kurdish website at Turkey's request". Ahval News. 30 June 2018.
  83. "Russia's RT banned from UK media freedom conference". BBC News. 9 July 2019. Retrieved 26 August 2019.
  84. "Measuring the reach of "fake news" and online disinformation in Europe". Digital News Report. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
  85. Bennetts, Marc (3 January 2020). "Britain is poisoning Estonia against us, says Kremlin". The Times. London. Retrieved 26 February 2020. (subscription required)
  86. Dwoskin, Elizabeth (26 October 2017). "Twitter bans Russian government-owned news sites RT and Sputnik from buying ads". The Washington Post. Retrieved 25 February 2020.
  87. "Twitter Bans Ads From Russia Today and the Sputnik Network, Citing Election Meddling". Time. 27 October 2017. Retrieved 26 July 2018.
  88. "Google to 'derank' Russia Today and Sputnik". BBC News. 21 November 2017. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
  89. Benková, Lívia. "The Rise of Russian Disinformation in Europe." (2018). https://www.aies.at/download/2018/AIES-Fokus_2018-03.pdf
  90. Drozdiak, Natalia (17 January 2019). "Facebook Accuses Staff at Russia's Sputnik of Fake Accounts". Bloomberg News. Retrieved 25 February 2020.
  91. "Removing Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior from Russia | Facebook Newsroom". Retrieved 18 January 2019.
  92. "Twitter Labels State Media, Government Officials' Accounts". The New York Times. Reuters. 6 August 2020. Retrieved 7 August 2020.
  93. "Products and services". Sputnik. Rossiya Segodnya. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
  94. "Radio map". radiomap.eu. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
Links for Radio Sputnik's Washington, D.C. station (W288BS-FM 105.5 MHz)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.