Pueblos Mágicos

The Programa Pueblos Mágicos (Spanish: [pweβloˈmaxiko] (listen); "Magical Towns Programme") is an initiative led by Mexico's Secretariat of Tourism, with support from other federal agencies, to promote a series of towns around the country that offer visitors special experiences because of their natural beauty, cultural richness, traditions, folklore, historical relevance, cuisine, art crafts, and great hospitality. It is intended to increase tourism to more localities, especially smaller towns in rural areas.

Programme logo

The program promotes visiting small, rural towns, where visitors may see indigenous crafts, spectacular landscapes and other attractions. The Government created the 'Pueblos Mágicos' program to recognize places across the country that have certain characteristics and traditions that make them unique, and historically significant, offering magical experiences to visitors. A "Magical Village" is a place with symbolism, legends, history, important events, festivals, traditions, great food, and enjoyable shopping, day-to-day life – in other words, "magic" in its social and cultural manifestations, with great opportunities for tourism. Every Pueblo Magico offers a special experience to the visitor.

The programme was launched in 2001. After 9 years and 32 towns having been selected, it was improved and relaunched in 2010. The government has added resources to support local efforts.[1] Every town was assigned a budget to continue improving its infrastructure, image, product offering, and experience, while making sure they were maintaining their traditions and their festivals were promoted. [2] By 2012 a total of 83 towns and villages in all 31 states have been awarded the title or nomination of Pueblo Mágico. The program created pride, recognition for its local citizens, and a diversification strategy to promote culture and Mexican traditions.

The program has offered opportunities to more citizens to make a living from tourism. This has contributed significantly to the economies of not only the pueblos, but also entire regions. Visitors' spending has stimulated the development of jobs, highly important in the towns with the most economic needs. Towns with more than five thousand residents are receiving more than 20 thousand visitors during the weekends.

In late 2018 it was reported that the program would be canceled and would not continue for 2019 due to the lack of support of the president Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO). However, in February 2019 Humberto Hernández, Under-secretary of Development and Tourist Regulation in the Ministry of Tourism, said that the program would continue "more strongly than ever." Under the new decentralized strategy, while the tourism ministry will continue to handle qualification of prospective pueblos mágicos and promotion and branding of the program, state governors will handle the allocation of government funds to projects in the towns.[3]

Objectives

The objectives of this program are:[4][5][6][7]

  • To structure a supplementary and diversified touristic supply within the interior of the country for locations that contain important historical and cultural attributes.
  • To diversify the country's tourism offerings.
  • To create and promote craftsmanship and support traditional festivals.
  • To preserve local traditions, culture, ethnic customs and the unique cuisine.
  • To create tourist products like adventures, extreme sports, ecotourism, festivals, local itineraries, wine and food activities and sport fishing.
  • To reassess, consolidate and reinforce touristic attractions of these towns in the country which represent fresh and different alternatives to meet the rising demand of national and international visitors.
  • To create jobs and reduce poverty.
  • This program was also developed with the purpose of recognizing the labor of its residents who have kept their cultural and historical riches of their home towns.

Criteria

In order to qualify for the program, towns should have a population of at least five thousand, and be located no more than 300 km, or the equivalent of traveling three hours by land, from a city with a well-resourced market, or good connectivity.[8] The town's municipal and state authorities must request incorporation from the Secretariat of Tourism so that assessment visits can be arranged to evaluate the potential of the site.[4][8][9] In addition, towns had to meet specific requirements in order to be considered.

The criteria included some of the following:

I. A formally constituted "Pueblo Mágico committee", citizens who represent the pueblo or local community. If the town is accepted into the program, they are responsible for maintaining the designation by working with the local citizens. Their job is to represent the residents of the town and their interests to make sure that the declaration will benefit all and by working together to maximise the opportunities. This group has to be diverse, with no more than 15 people who are willing to contribute their work pro-bono. Group members should rotate periodically.

II. A town council accord, which states an agreement to apply for admittance into the program. The local authorities have to support inclusion in the program, as their support is essential for success. This document affirms the formal support.

III. Agreement of the state congress; state support is needed to assign resources, mainly for infrastructure.

IV. Direct economic contribution towards touristic development in projects, action plans and programs. Each town must try to differentiate from other towns. The plans should relate to the unique features of the town and why it should be considered.

V. An updated municipal touristic development program, with a time frame of at least three years. A long-term plan should be for 3 years to make sure the declaration is maintained, and that the town is working to improve conditions for tourists. The program should be updated every three years.

VI. Rules and local regulations should be updated to have a touristic focus during the current administration of the Municipality. This is to support and protect visitors and people dedicated to tourism activities.

VII. Evidence of the symbolic attraction of the aspiring community, or what makes the town unique.

VIII. Availability of health and public security services for tourists in case of an emergency.

IX. Documentation of private and social investment in touristic development and quality, including hotel rooms, restaurants, tours, museums, activities, etc.

X. Other elements that the committee considers relevant for touristic activity.

Process

  • The Pueblo's citizens committee and relevant stakeholders create the file containing all documents, details fulfilling all the requirements, and the request of candidacy to the Secretary of Tourism and the evaluation committee.
  • A formal presentation with examples and details is made to the evaluation committee during a scheduled appointment in Mexico City.
  • The formal committee has representation from Secretariats of Tourism, Culture, Environment and several other government officials.
  • The evaluation committee reviews the file, ensures that all the requirements were met, conducts a physical inspection in the town, and reports back by documenting findings.
  • If 100% of the requirements are met then they approve the nomination and turn matters over to the Secretary of Tourism who is responsible to visit the Pueblo, invite the local authorities and local residents, and give the new "nomination" or declaration at the same time that it has to take the oath to the local committee representing the citizens of the town.
  • The local citizens and the committee are responsible to maintain the declaration and the town's "magic" standing. Nominations are not permanent, with annual revisions and audits for some towns.
  • If an applying pueblo doesn't meet the requirements, the details are shared back to the committee, and the pueblo will be asked to provide any requested missing information.
  • If the Pueblo doesn't qualify due to inability to meet the required attributes, a formal response is provided to the committee.

Mexico has more than 2500 municipalities; hundreds apply annually to this program with very few of them being selected. This is a very successful and prestigious program that provides benefits to local residents who benefit from the resulting economic activity bringing prosperity and various tangible and intangible benefits to their communities.[10]

List

# Image Town State Registration Year
1Huasca de OcampoHidalgo2001
2Real de CatorceSan Luis Potosí2001
3TaxcoGuerrero2002
4TepotzotlánMéxico2002
5TapalpaJalisco2002
6ComalaColima2002
7PátzcuaroMichoacán2002
8Dolores HidalgoGuanajuato2002
9CuetzalanPuebla2002
10IzamalYucatán2002
11TequilaJalisco2003
12San Cristóbal de las CasasChiapas2003
13Real del MonteHidalgo2004
14Parras de la FuenteCoahuila2004
15Valle de BravoMéxico2005
16MazamitlaJalisco2005
17ÁlamosSonora2005
18TlalpujahuaMichoacán2005
19CosaláSinaloa2005
20BernalQuerétaro2005
21CoatepecVeracruz2006
22Real de AsientosAguascalientes2006
23CuitzeoMichoacán2006
24SantiagoNuevo León2006
25Todos SantosBaja California Sur2006
26BacalarQuintana Roo2006
27Jerez de García SalinasZacatecas2007
28HuamantlaTlaxcala2007
29CreelChihuahua2007
30Capulálpam de MéndezOaxaca2007
31Ciudad MierTamaulipas2007
32El FuerteSinaloa2009
33Santa Clara del Cobre Michoacán2010
34TepoztlánMorelosDeclared in 2001, status revoked in 2009, but restored in 2010
35TapijulapaTabasco2010
36PalizadaCampeche2010
37Jalpan de SerraQuerétaro2010
38MalinalcoMéxico2010
39ZacatlánPuebla2011
40Teúl de González OrtegaZacatecas2011
41TlayacapanMorelos2011
42Mineral del ChicoHidalgo2011
43Cadereyta de MontesQuerétaro2011
44TulaTamaulipas2011
45El OroMéxico2011
46XicoVeracruz2011
47San Sebastián del OesteJalisco2011
48XilitlaSan Luis Potosí2011
49Mineral de PozosGuanajuato2012
50SombrereteZacatecas2012
51AngangueoMichoacán2012
52Cuatrociénegas de CarranzaCoahuila2012
53Magdalena de KinoSonora2012
54PahuatlánPuebla2012
55LoretoBaja California Sur2012
56ValladolidYucatán2012
57MetepecMéxico2012
58Chiapa de CorzoChiapas2012
59ComitánChiapas2012
60HuichapanHidalgo2012
61TequisquiapanQuerétaro2012
62BatopilasChihuahua2012
63Chignahuapan Puebla2012
64 Cholula (San Pedro y San Andrés) Puebla2012
65PinosZacatecas2012
66Lagos de MorenoJalisco2012
67TacámbaroMichoacán2012
68CalvilloAguascalientes2012
69NochistlanZacatecas2012
70JiquilpanMichoacán2012
71TlatlauquitepecPuebla2012
72TzintzuntzanMichoacán2012
73MapimíDurango2012
74PapantlaVeracruz2012
75TecateBaja California2012
76ArteagaCoahuila2012
77ViescaCoahuila2012
78Jalpa de CánovasGuanajuato2012
79SalvatierraGuanajuato2012
80YuririaGuanajuato2012
81XicotepecPuebla2012
82JalaNayarit2012
83El RosarioSinaloa2012
84Aculco De EspinozaMéxico2015
85AtlixcoPuebla2015
86CandelaCoahuila2015
87Casas GrandesChihuahua2015
88Coscomatepec de BravoVeracruz2015
89GuerreroCoahuila2015
90HuauchinangoPuebla2015
91Huautla de JimenezOaxaca2015
92Isla MujeresQuintana Roo2015
93Ixtapan de la SalMéxico2015
94LinaresNuevo León2015
95MascotaJalisco2015
96MazunteOaxaca2015
97MocoritoSinaloa2015
98OrizabaVeracruz2015
99PalenqueChiapas2015
100San JoaquínQuerétaro2015
101San José de GraciaAguascalientes2015
102San Pablo Villa de MitlaOaxaca2015
103San Pedro y San Pablo TeposcolulaOaxaca2015
104SayulitaNayarit2015
105Talpa de AllendeJalisco2015
106TecozautlaHidalgo2015
107TeotihuacánMéxico2015
108TlaxcoTlaxcala2015
109TulumQuintana Roo2015
110Villa del CarbónMéxico2015
111Zozocolco de HidalgoVeracruz2015
112Nombre de DiosDurango2018 [11]
113Melchor MúzquizCoahuila2018
114ComonfortGuanajuato2018
115ZimapánHidalgo2018
116TlaquepaqueJalisco2018
117CompostelaNayarit2018
118Amealco de BonfilQuerétaro2018
119AquismónSan Luis Potosí2018
120BustamanteNuevo León2018
121GuadalupeZacatecas2018

Towns removed from the program

Below is the list of sites that were enrolled in the program, but had their titles revoked for failure to meet standards during the re-evaluation or audit. One of them received enhanced recognition.

# Image Town State Registration Year Retirement Year
1San Miguel de AllendeGuanajuato2002In 2008 its status on the list was removed due to its inclusion as an UNESCO World Heritage Site.
2MexcaltitlánNayarit2001Status removed in 2009.

Other

Some governments have tried to eliminate the program for political reasons but because this model is a citizen-based program focusing on empowering communities, these efforts have been unsuccessful. According to statistics from INEGI, the Pueblo Mágico program has provided great economic value, and created jobs for its participating communities. The program has been recognised by several countries around the world, as a role model domestically and internationally. [12]

gollark: Maybe try and get rootaccess™ using hackerization™ and run haskell properly?
gollark: To some extent, the internet's culture of free expression is going away, and being replaced with "please pick from this list of acceptable political views to use [any large platform]".
gollark: "Remember the internet before Facebook bought TCP/IP?"
gollark: Ah yes, HTML hackerman?
gollark: Did you know: some jellyfish and 0.43% of osmarks.tk users are immortal?

See also

References

  1. "Destinan mil 900 mdp a 'Pueblos Mágicos'". www.zocalo.com.mx.
  2. https://www.mexicodesconocido.com.mx/destinos-vivir-dia-muertos-mexico.html Day of the Dead in Pueblo Magico
  3. https://www.sdpnoticias.com/economia/2019/02/12/gobierno-de-amlo-mantendra-el-programa-de-pueblos-magicos - SPNoticias,com, Gobierno de AMLO mantendrá el programa de Pueblos Mágicos (AMLO Government will maintain the Pueblo Mágico program), Feb. 12, 2019
  4. "Pueblos Mágicos, herencia que impulsan Turismo". gob.mx (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-03-06.
  5. Balslev Clausen, Helene; Gyimóthy, Szilvia (2016). "Seizing community participation in sustainable development: pueblos Mágicos of Mexico". Journal of Cleaner Production. 111: 318–326. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.084.
  6. Pérez-Ramírez, Carlos Alberto; Antolín-Espinosa, Diana Itzel (2016). "Programa pueblos magicos y desarrollo local: Actores, dimensiones y perspectivas en El Oro, Mexico". Estudios Sociales. 25 (47): 217. doi:10.24836/es.v25i47.315. ISSN 0188-4557.
  7. Uhnák, Adam (2014-06-01). "The Mexican 'Pueblos Mágicos'. A Qualitative Research Using Ethnological Methodology". Ethnologia Actualis. 14 (1): 8–18. doi:10.2478/eas-2014-0001. ISSN 1339-7877.
  8. México, El Universal, Compañia Periodística Nacional. "El Universal - - Concierge Cómo identificar un pueblo mágico". archivo.eluniversal.com.mx (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-03-06.
  9. "DOF - Diario Oficial de la Federación". www.dof.gob.mx (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-03-06.
  10. "Las ventajas de ser Pueblo Mágico". www.elfinanciero.com.mx.
  11. "México tiene 10 nuevos Pueblos Mágicos". Expansión. 12 October 2018.
  12. "Example at internal level and to other countries" (PDF).
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.