Livonian campaign of Stephen Báthory

The Livonian campaign of Stephen Báthory (referred to as the Russo-Polish War among Polish historians[1]) took place in the final stage of the Livonian War, between 1577 and 1582. Polish-Lithuanian forces led by Stephen Báthory (Batory), King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania, successfully fought against the army of Ivan IV "the Terrible", Tsar of Russia, over the Duchy of Livonia and Polotsk. Russian forces were expelled from Livonia before the campaign was concluded by the Truce of Jam Zapolski.

Livonian campaign of Stephen Báthory
Part of Livonian War

Map of the Duchy of Livonia.
Date1577–1582
Location
Duchy of Livonia, Polish-Russian borderlands
Result Polish victory, Truce of Jam Zapolski
Belligerents
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Principality of Transylvania		 Tsardom of Russia
Commanders and leaders
Stephen Báthory
Jan Zamoyski		 Ivan IV of Russia
Campaigns of Stefan Batory (1578-82)

Background
Main article: Livonian War

In the second half of the 16th century, several powers, including Poland, Lithuania, and Russia were engaged in the struggle over the control of the ports in the southern Baltic Sea (Dominium Maris Baltici). The Russo-Lithuanian War of 1558–1570, in which Poland aided Lithuania (and in 1569 united with it forming the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth), ended inconclusively with a three-year-long truce. The death of Polish king Sigismund II Augustus created a brief period in which Tsar Ivan IV of Russia contemplated taking part in the Polish royal election (see Polish-Lithuanian-Muscovite Commonwealth), but eventually the Commonwealth elected Stephen Báthory of Poland to its throne, and the hostilities between Russia and the Commonwealth resumed.[2]

1575–1577

In 1575 Ivan ordered another attack on Poland, and succeeded in taking parts of Livonia (notably, Salacgrīva and Pärnu). In 1577 Russian forces besieged Reval (Revel, Tallinn) and a strong army was concentrating near Pskov. At the same time Polish forces were tied down on the western side of the Baltic Sea, dealing with the Danzig rebellion. In July the main Muscovite army of about 30,000 advanced from Pskov, taking Viļaka, Rēzekne, Daugavpils, Koknese, Gulbene, and surrounding areas.[3] A Polish counter-offensive—known as the First Campaign of Bathory—begun in the fall, and succeeded in taking back some of the territories.[3]

Polish-Lithuanian military men

1578

Negotiations took part in that year, and a three-year truce was signed, although it was rejected by King Bathory who was preparing for a larger counteroffensive. At the same time, Polish and Swedish forces managed to stop further progress of the Muscovite forces in the Battles of Wenden (1577–1578).[3]

1579–1580

Prelude

A large army was gathered prior to the campaign. In preparation to the campaign, some 7,311 cavalry and 6,519 infantry mercenaries were hired in the Kingdom of Poland, while the Grand Duchy of Lithuania hired 1,445 cavalry and 2,530 infantry mercenaries.[4] The mercenaries were assembled into units according to their ethnicities (Hungarian, German, and Polish).[4] The Hungarian mercenaries stayed on after the campaign, forming the Hajduk units. Combined with levies among the aristocrats, a force of 41,914 soldiers was assembled (22,975 from Lithuania and 18,739 from Poland).[4] The majority of this force, 71%, were cavalry and mercenaries made up some 41% of the army.[5] Peasant levy pioneer regiments, with Russian streltsy and Ukrainian Cossack bands were in the army.[4] Bathory's army consisted of Polish, Lithuanian, Hungarian, Wallachian, Bohemian, and German soldiers, besides the Szekler brigade under Mózes Székely.[6]

Campaign

Bathory was the supreme commander[7] of the main army (over 40,000 strong), however, he appointed commanders to lead different parts of it:

The Lithuanian soldiers were reluctant to follow any orders given by Polish commanders and set up their own military camps apart from the Poles, took military decisions autonomously, in addition to many other actions, sometimes to the detriment of the war effort.[4] In other words, the army did not have a centralised command system.

During the fighting known as the Second Campaign of Bathory, the army advanced on Polotsk. The siege began 11 August, and the city surrendered on the 29th of that month.[8] The Polish-Lithuanian army also captured all 8 Russian-occupied castles in Polotsk - Rasony region (Sokol, Nescherda, Susha, Krasnae, Turovlia, Sitna, Kaz'jany, Usviaty) . Lithuanian-Polish forces resumed their offensive the following year with the Third Campaign of Bathory, besieging Velikiye Luki on 29 August and taking it on 5 September. A cavalry battle took place on 20 September near Toropets and ended in another victory for the Commonwealth. The joint forces also captured Velizh and Nevel.[3]

Muscovite cavalryman

1581–1582
Siege of Pskov, the last (and unfinished) painting of Karl Briullov; the siege from Russian perspective...

The last phase of the war centered around the siege of Pskov by the Polish forces. Batory did not succeed in taking the town, but the Russians, facing growing threat from Sweden (who took Narva in the battle of Narva (1581), decided to sign a truce treaty favorable to Poland.[3][9]

...and the siege from Polish perspective, "Bathory at Pskov" by Jan Matejko.

Truce of Jam Zapolski

The truce, signed in 1582 for 10 years, was favorable to Poland, which regained Duchy of Livonia, kept Velizh and Polotsk. Russia regained Velikiye Luki.[3][10] Notably, Russia failed in her bid to regain access to the Baltic Sea.[9]

The next stage of the Polish-Russian wars begun in the early 1600s, when the Poles invaded Russia in 1605.

Notes
  1. Władysław Konopczyński, Dzieje Polski nowożytnej (1936), pp. 152–165.
  2. (in Polish) Inflancka wojna, Encyklopedia WIEM
  3. Dariusz Kupisz, Psków 1581–1582, Warszawa, 2006
  4. Kotarski, H. "Wojsko polsko - litewskie podczas wojny inflanckiej 1576 - 1582". Studia i materialy do historii wojskowości. 17: 96–107.
  5. Antanaitis, Kastytis (2005). "Lietuvos Kariuomenėje Livonijos Karo Kampanijose 1578-1581 m.". Karo Archyvas. 20: 66–67.
  6. E. Liptai: Magyarország hadtörténete (1), Zrínyi Katonai Kiadó 1984. ISBN 963-326-320-4
  7. Solikowski, J. Krótki pamiętnik. p. 50.
  8. Dariusz Kupisz, Połock 1579, Warszawa, 2003
  9. Charles Arnold-Baker, The companion to British history, Routledge, 2001, ISBN 0-415-18583-1, Google Print, p.95
  10. Jerzy Jan Lerski, Piotr Wróbel, Richard J. Kozicki, Historical dictionary of Poland, 966-1945, Greenwood Publishing Group, 1996, ISBN 0-313-26007-9, Google Print, p.218
gollark: Something like `{"tracks": [{"title": "bee movie full soundtrack", "start": 0, "end": 600000}] }`, while odd-looking, is valid JSON.
gollark: All the parser implementations around should accept that as valid, and you can use a fixed amount of size.
gollark: Okay, very hacky but technically workable: have an XTMF metadata block of a fixed size, and after the actual JSON data, instead of just ending it with a `}`, have enough spaces to fill up the remaining space then a `}`.
gollark: XTMF was not really designed for this use case, so it'll be quite hacky. What you can do is leave a space at the start of the tape of a fixed size, and stick the metadata at the start of that fixed-size region; the main problem is that start/end locations are relative to the end of the metadata, not the start of the tape, so you'll have to recalculate the offsets each time the metadata changes size. Unfortunately, I just realized now that the size of the metadata can be affected by what the offset is.
gollark: The advantage of XTMF is that your tapes would be playable by any compliant program for playback, and your thing would be able to read tapes from another program.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.