Coal in Turkey

Coal supplies over a quarter of Turkey's primary energy.[1] The heavily subsidised coal industry generates over a third of the country's electricity[2] and emits a third of Turkey's greenhouse gases. Every year, thousands of people die prematurely from coal-related causes, the most common of which is local air pollution.

Government-owned Turkish Coal Operations Authority mine in Yeniköy, Milas

Most coal mined in Turkey is lignite (brown coal), which is more polluting than other types of coal.[3] Turkey's energy policy encourages mining lignite for coal-fired power stations in order to reduce gas imports;[2] and coal supplies over 40% of domestic energy production.[4] Mining peaked in 2018, at over 100 million tonnes,[5] and declined considerably in 2019.[6] In contrast to local lignite production, Turkey imports almost all of the bituminous coal it uses. The largest coalfield in Turkey is Elbistan.[7]

History
Wharf that formerly shipped coal out of Zonguldak
Coal-fired Ottoman submarine Abdül Hamid, built in 1886, was the first submarine in history to fire a torpedo while submerged[8]

Mining and industry

As the Ottoman Navy expanded its steam powered fleet in the 1840s to help defend the Ottoman Empire against the expanding Russian Empire, it became a national priority to find domestic coalfields.[9] There are several apocryphal stories about the discovery of coal on the Black Sea coast in what is now Zonguldak Province. However, it is certain that the Ereğli Coal Mine Company started production in 1842 and that coal mined in Ereğli and Amasra was used to fuel steamboats.[9]

In 1848 the Ereğli Coal Basin (now called the Zonguldak Basin) was mapped and claimed by Sultan Abdulmejid I, who later leased it, mainly to foreign merchants.[9] The first customer of Turkey's coal industry was the Ottoman Navy. However, during the Crimean War in the mid-1850s, production was commandeered by the Ottoman Empire's allies, the British Royal Navy,[9] and production increased by importing mining machinery and training Turkish miners.[10] By 1875 the Ottoman Navy had become the third largest in the world and expansion of the mines attracted workers from outside the area, despite the dangerous conditions.[11]

The first coal-fired power station, Silahtarağa Power Station (now SantralIstanbul culture center) opened in 1914, and after the defeat of the empire in World War I, and the subsequent Turkish War of Independence, the new Republic of Turkey industrialized further as part of Atatürk's reforms. Lignite from Soma supplied the army in WW1[9] and lignite mining began at several other coalfields in 1927.[12] The Zonguldak coalfield remains the only national source of the hard coal which was historically necessary for steelmaking: its mines were nationalized in 1940.[13] In the mid-20th century the state encouraged the growth of cement[9] and steelmaking in Zonguldak. In the late 20th century many power stations were constructed near lignite fields such as Elbistan coalfield.

Antique coke stove exhibited in Arıkan House, Kozan.

In the early 21st century there was a growing realization of the damage done by coal to public health. However, the Turkish government wished to avoid importing too much natural gas, which was expensive at that time, with supply dominated by Russia.[14] The nascent environmental movement was unable to prevent many more coal-fired power stations being built. After years of struggle by environmentalists flue emissions standards were finally improved at the end of the 2010s, resulting in the closure of a few older plants.[15] As for steelmaking, most plants are now electric arc furnaces.[16]

Residential heating and cooking

Starting in the 19th century, stoves took the place of wood burning ovens in traditional Anatolian houses. For heating, every room had a stove with a stovepipe or chimney. After the late 1970s, coke was reserved for use in institutions such as schools, and the more polluting but cheaper coal was supplied to households. Imports of natural gas started in the late 1980s[17] and by the end of the 2010s the pipeline distribution network had been extended to over 80% of the population.[18] However due to energy poverty, some of those people still used coal[19] and the resulting air pollution causes illness and premature deaths.[20] Most buildings constructed since the late 20th century have gas heating, not coal.

In the 2020s, stoves burning coal and wood are still sometimes used for heating especially in rural areas, and even occasionally for cooking,[21] although electricity and bottled gas are available everywhere. Free coal is supplied to households with an average per person income less than one third of the minimum wage (less than 700 lira in 2020), even in neighborhoods which have piped gas.[22] Indoor concentration of particulates is highest in the winter.[23] Over three quarters of carbon monoxide deaths are due to stoves: almost 200 in 2017 mostly in poorer rural areas.[24]

Coalfields and mines

As of 2017 Turkey was 11th in the list of countries by coal production, and mined 1.3% of the world's coal, with lignite and sub-bituminous deposits widespread throughout the country.[25] Due to the country's geology, there is no hard coal, which has a higher energy density (over 7,250 kcal/kg), within 1000 m of the surface.[26][27] All coal deposits are owned by the state but over half of mining is private sector.[25] In 2017 almost half of Turkey's coal production was mined by the state-owned mines, but the government is seeking an expansion of privatization.[28] As of 2019, there are 436 coal mining companies,[29] 740 coal mines,[30] and more mining and exploration licences are being tendered.[31] However, some drilling companies are not bidding for licences because mineral exploration is more profitable and in 2018 many mining licences were combined with coal licenses.[32] Mining is documented in the "e-maden" computer system ("maden" means "mine" in Turkish).[33] Coal miners do not have the right to strike.[34]

Hard coal

The Zonguldak basin in the northwest is the only coal mining region in Turkey that produces hard coal:[note 1] about 2 million tons a year[6] from mines including Kandilli, Amasra, Karadon, Kozlu and Üzülmez.[35] Compared to other countries, the energy value of the coal is low, at 4,000 kilocalories per kilogram (1,800 kcal/lb) to 6,000 kcal/kg (2,700 kcal/lb). Although low grade it is generally of cokeable or semi-cokeable quality.[36][35] Because there is so much faulting and folding, mining in the region is very difficult.[26] Long-wall mining is necessary due to the tectonic structure of the seams.[27]

Lignite

In 2018 Turkey was the third-largest lignite mining country,[37] with 7% of world production.[3] The most significant deposits of lignite coal were laid down in the geological Neogene period.[38] Almost half of the country's lignite reserves are in the Afşin–Elbistan basin.[2] Lignite coalfields include Elbistan, Kutahya Tavsanlı, Inez, Manisa, İnağzı-Bağlık and Gediz,[39][35] and 90% of lignite production is from surface mines.[25] Locations of major individual lignite mines include Tunçbilek in Tavşanlı, Yatağan near the southern Aegean Sea, Yeniköy in Muğla and Seyitömer in Kütahya; and there is a gilsonite mine in Silopi.[35] Turkish lignite has high carbon,[note 2] sulphur, ash, moisture and volatile components. [36][35] Its calorific value is less than 12.5 MJ/kg – and that from Afsin Elbistan has less than 5 MJ/kg, which is a quarter of typical thermal coal.[41]

Mining technology

Exploration and research is done by Maden Tetkik Arama Genel Müdürlüğü (MTA).[42] In the 2010s coal mining technology from China was imported.[43] But according to energy analyst Haluk Direskeneli coal power plant technology which has been imported is unsuitable for Turkish coal, so refractory distortions are occurring, and control systems and other equipment is failing. He says that circulating fluidized bed (CFB) technology is unsuitable because Turkish lignite does not burn continuously in the CFB combustion chamber without supplementary liquid fuel. In Direskeneli's opinion "local coal enters the combustion chamber as ice in winter and as mud in summer", so the water content of domestic coal should be reduced by preheating.[44]

As of 2018, environmental regulations for coal mines still lag behind international standards despite improvements.[45] As of 2019 an expansion of coal washing capacity was planned together with research on coal pollution mitigation and lignite gasification.[46]

Health and safety

The Istanbul Policy Center estimates that every year in Turkey, coal causes at least 2,800 premature deaths, 637,000 working days to be lost, and 3.6 billion euros in additional costs. Although there are some concerns about ground[47][note 3] and water[49] pollution, most coal-related deaths are caused by worsening air pollution in Turkey.[3]

Workers' health and safety

After the deaths of over 300 people in the Soma mine disaster in 2014,[50] new health and safety regulations were introduced. As of 2018, most mining accidents happen in coal mines but the reasons for Turkey's poor mining safety are not entirely clear.[51] Most underground coal-mining deaths are caused by methane explosions and other gas-related accidents.[52] The government has restricted access to workplace accident statistics, but coal mining is thought to be the most accident-prone sector of the economy.[3] As of 2018 coal mining fatalities continue to occur in illegal mines.[53] Coal miners suffer respiratory diseases such as black lung,[54] chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,[55] back pain,[56] periodontal disease[57] and other illnesses; and increased risk from respiratory infections such as coronavirus disease 2019.[55]

Air pollution
See also: Air pollution in Turkey

Air pollution from some large coal-fired power stations is publicly visible in Sentinel satellite data.[58][59] The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) says that old coal-fired power stations and residential heating are emitting dangerous levels of fine particulates: so it recommends reducing particulate emissions by replacing coal used for residential heating with gas, and retrofitting or closing old coal-fired power plants.[60] Although the Turkish government receives reports of measurements of air pollution from the smokestacks of individual coal-fired power stations, it does not publish the reports, unlike the EU. The OECD has also recommended Turkey create and publish a pollutant release and transfer register.[61]

Yeniköy power station in Milas, Muğla

Flue gas emission limits in milligrams per cubic metre (mg/Nm3) are:[62][63]

Size of power stationDustSO2NO2CO
0.5 MW ≤ capacity < 5 MW200see cited sourcesee cited source200
5 MW ≤ capacity < 50 MW150see cited sourcesee cited source200
50 MW ≤ capacity < 100 MW50850400150
capacity ≥ 100 MW30200200200

Some plants lack electrostatic precipitator filters.[44] Environment Minister Murat Kurum said in December 2019 that unless plants which emit over the limits start installing the necessary filters during the first half of 2020 they will face fines, nationalization or closure.[64] The limits are laxer than the EU Industrial Emissions Directive and the SO2 limit for large coal-fired power plants in other countries, such as India at 100 mg/m3, and China at 35 mg/m3.[65]

As of 2018, air pollution in districts that are near coal-fired power stations greatly exceeds national limits of PM10 (coarse particulate matter) and SO2. In Elbistan district, PM10 averages are over three times the regulatory limit, and in Soma SO2 averages are over four times the limit.[66] As of 2019, according to Greenpeace air pollution around power plants in Kütahya Province was three times higher than World Health Organisation recommended limits.[67] As of 2020 there are no limits on PM2.5.[68]

Environment
Greenhouse gas emissions in 2018
CO2 from burning fossil fuels

The environmental impact of the coal industry is both local and international.

Greenhouse gas emissions
See also: Greenhouse gas emissions by Turkey § Coal

Coal combustion emitted over 150 Mt of CO2 in total in 2018,[69] about a third of Turkey's greenhouse gas.[lower-alpha 1] Emissions from individual power plants over 20 MW are measured.[70] Life-cycle emissions of Turkish coal-fired power stations are over 1 kg CO2eq per kilowatt-hour.[71] The environmental impact assessment (EIA) for the proposed Afşin-Elbistan C power station estimated CO
2 emissions would be more than 60 million tonnes of CO
2 per year.[72] By comparison, total annual greenhouse gas emissions by Turkey are about 520 million tonnes;[73] thus more than a tenth of greenhouse gas emissions by Turkey would be from the planned power station.[note 4][note 5]

As of 2019 coal mine methane remains an environmental challenge,[80] because removing it from working underground mines is a safety requirement but if vented to the atmosphere it is a potent greenhouse gas.[25]

Water consumption

Because Turkey's lignite-fired power stations have to be very close to their mines to avoid excessive lignite transport costs,[81] they are mostly inland (see map of active coal-fired power stations in Turkey). Coal power stations may require a large quantity of water for the circulating water plant[82] and coal washing if required. In Turkey, fresh water is used because of the locations of the plants. Between 600 and 3000 cubic metres of water is used per GWh generated,[83] much more than solar and wind power.[84] This intensive use has led to shortages in nearby villages and farmlands.[85]

Mine site remediation

Acid mine drainage from coal refuse varies considerably but in some areas remediation of the mine sites is needed.[86]

Consumption

The amount of coal consumed in 2017 was more than a quarter higher than the amount in 2012, but coal made up about 30% of Turkey's primary energy in both years.[87] In 2018, 80% of coal was used to generate power by coal-fired power stations in Turkey, 14% was used by industry, and 6% by buildings.[88] In absolute numbers for 2018, 13 Mtoe of hard coal were used to generate electricity and heat; 4 Mtoe, in coke ovens; 2 Mtoe, for home heating; 2 Mtoe, in cement manufacture; and 1 Mtoe was used for iron and steel.[89] In 2018, 12 Mtoe of lignite were used to generate electricity and heat, 2 Mtoe in industry, and 1 Mtoe was used for home heating.[89] Lignite fired power stations did not become more productive between 2009 and 2018,[90] but three-quarters by weight of coal burnt in Turkish power stations is lignite.[91]

Electricity generation

Of the total 308.5 terawatt-hours of electricity generated in 2019 coal's share was 114.6 terawatt-hours (37%).[92]

Iron

Coal is used in making pig iron[93] and companies such as Kardemir[94] and İsdemir[95] use coal, and Erdemir washes coal[96] and operate blast furnaces.[97]

Subsidies
See also: Electricity sector in Turkey § Economics and finance

As a signatory of the Convention on Biological Diversity (Aichi Target 3), Turkey committed to phasing out environmentally harmful subsidies, including those to fossil fuels, by 2020.[98] However, coal remained the most subsidized source of electricity in Turkey.[99] By 2020, according to Carbon Tracker, both new wind and solar power were cheaper than building new coal power plants; and they forecast that wind would become cheaper than existing coal plants in 2027, and solar in 2023.[100] Lignite-fired power stations receive multiple subsidies for construction[101][note 6] and operation.[102] Specific subsidy programs include value-added tax waivers, offsetting investment costs and tax reductions.[103]

Turkey's government support to coal and coal-fired power production and consumption ₺ millions, 2016–2017 annual average [98]
Instrument Coal production Coal-fired power Coal consumption
Fiscal support (budgetary transfers and tax exemptions) 947 31 1,287
State-owned enterprise investment 198 953 none identified

In 2019, the Turkish government supported a bill to subsidize coal mining with multiple economic incentives.[104] Mining and coal power plants are funded by theTurkey Wealth Fund, but they do not describe it as a subsidy and they plan to pay dividends to the Treasury by 2025.[105] Carbon Tracker estimated in 2020 that the average coal fleet profitability was 24 USD/MWh and that a quarter of power stations were cashflow negative.[106]

Capacity mechanism

In 2019 large lignite burning stations were subsidized with capacity mechanism payments totalling almost 1 billion lira.[107][108][note 7] Unlike new solar and wind power in Turkey's electricity market, these were not decided by reverse auction but fixed by the government, and energy demand management is not eligible.[109] Subsidy continues in 2020 and 13 coal fired power stations received January payments.[110]

The price of electricity generated from domestic coal is adjusted according to the consumer price index, the producer price index and the dollar exchange rate, and paid by the state-owned electricity company to private-sector power plants.[111]

Companies

Between 2008 and 2018, the coal industry was partially privatized;[27] nevertheless state-owned companies mined over half of the total amount of Turkish coal in 2018.[5] Turkish Coal Operations Authority (TKİ) owns lignite mines, and Turkish Hard Coal Enterprises (TTK) owns hardcoal mines.

Several companies have acquired mining rights for hard coal fields: Erdemir Madencilik, a subsidiary of Turkey's autonomous military pension program; Oyak; Tumas, a subsidiary of Bereket Holding, and energy company Emsa Enerji.[39] In 2019 private companies paid over 20 million lira royalties to TTK.[112] Lignite fields have been transferred to Imbat Madencilik, Fernas Holding, Demir Export and construction group Yapi Tek.[27] Another company, Polyak Eynez, is developing a hard lignite mine near İzmir that is planned to be the deepest in the country[113] and an associated power plant.[114] Eren Holding holds the largest amount of coal-fired generation capacity, 2,790 megawatts,[115] at the ZETES power complex in Zonguldak. Several companies hold more than a gigawatt of coal power capacity: IC Içtaş Enerji, the state-owned Electricity Generation Company (EÜAŞ); Konya Şeker, a company owned by Anadolu Birlik Holding; ERG Elektrik; Diler Holding; Çelikler Holding and Ciner Holding.[116] However, mining licence information that is held by the government in the "e-maden" database is not released to the public.[117]

In the late 2010s, the government attempted to auction mine licenses to private companies provided that they would build nearby power plants,[27] but the auctions attracted little interest[118] as the currency weakened.[119] Also at that time the government tried to re-privatize the 290-MW Yunus Emre power station, but it remains publicly owned. And although lignite is more polluting than most other types of coal, the government tried to persuade other coal-fired power stations to convert to lignite to reduce import costs.[120] The 2018 Turkish currency crisis and 2020 coronavirus recession increased costs for mining companies and increased the difficulty of obtaining bank credits, threatening the coal industry.[121][122] Turkish energy companies owe over US$50 billion to banks. In particular, Anadolu Birlik Holding holds $1 billion in debt.[123]

International investments

Turkish company Yılmaden has acquired coal mining rights in Colombia.[124] Companies based in Turkey are building coal-fired power stations in other countries such as Sri Lanka[125] and the national exim bank is still prepared to finance coal power if it is Ultra Super Critical with emissions <750g CO2/kWh.[126] Chinese state owned enterprises and companies investing in coal power projects[127] include Shanghai Electric Power, which is the main investor in the Emba Hunutlu power station under construction in Adana Province.[128][129]

Imports
Much of the rise in consumption in the 21st century was due to the construction of coastal power stations burning imported hard coal.

In 2019 about 32 million tonnes was imported,[130] 3% of the world's coal,[87] and in 2018 US$4.4 billion was spent.[131] Imported coal generates about a quarter of the nation's electricity:[132] more than local coal[133] and the country is a major importer on the spot market.[93] A customs union deal with the EU includes bilateral trade concessions on coal.[134] The largest supplier in 2019 was Colombia with 17.5 Mt.[135] Russian is the second largest supplier, and its coal may become more competitive when improvements to Taman Port are completed in 2020, or when some contracts expire in 2021.[136]

In 2019 the largest supplier of coking coal was Australia, and met coke was imported from Russia and China.[137] There is a 5% import tariff on US coking coal.[138] The main ports for import of met coal are Eregli, Zonguldak and Iskenderun.[138] As of 2018 if the import price of thermal coal is less than 70 US$/tonne (fob) the state charges the difference as import duty.[42] In 2020 coking coal cost around US$130/tonne.[139] Anthracite coal from Donbass, a region in Ukraine, is exported (allegedly illegally) to Turkey.[140] The anthracite is transported through the Russian ports of Azov and Taganrog to the Turkish city of Samsun.[141]

Politics

As of 2020, Zafer Sönmez, the CEO of Turkey's sovereign wealth fund, wants to invest in coal:[142] coal power is part of the national energy strategy[143] but the private sector will not invest in it without substantial government support. According to Ümit Şahin, who teaches climate change at Sabancı University, Turkey is not facing up to the reality that most coal will have to be left in the ground and risks losing access to international climate finance if the country does not quickly schedule an exit from coal.[144]

Many local communities strongly oppose coal power stations[145] and mines,[146] sometimes taking legal action against them.[147] From the late 2000s, residents of Amasra strongly fought against the establishment of a coal-fired power station near the city; it was cancelled.[148] In Alpu district, locals of the region won a court battle in 2018 to prevent the building of a new coal mine; the 14th chamber of the Council of State ruled that the mine could only be built with an environmental report.[149] Turkish activists have also taken their campaign to international conferences.[150] Nevertheless, in 2019 only 36 of the 600 members of parliament voted to reduce power plant emission limits.[151]

Coal phase-out

A 2020 study of coal-fired residential heating in Turkey's 3rd largest city İzmir estimated the cost of replacing it versus the reduction in illness and premature deaths.[20]

Five old plants (Afşin-Elbistan A, Seyitömer, Tunçbilek, Kangal and Çatalağzı) were closed in 2020 because they did not meet new pollution limits[152] but were mostly restarted later in the year.[153] The country is the world's ninth-largest consumer of coal, similar to Poland and Germany, but Germany has more developed plans for a coal phase-out,[154] – an area for planned cooperation.[155] In terms of energy resources, Spain is more similar, having hydropower and abundant sunshine, and its transition away from coal could also be a model.[156] Turkish industry has experience converting coal to solar outside the country.[157]

In 2019, the OECD said that Turkey's coal-fired power plant development programme is creating a high carbon lock-in risk due to the large capital costs and long infrastructure lifetimes.[158] It also stated that energy and climate policies that are not aligned in future may prevent some assets from providing an economic return due to the transition to a low-carbon economy.[159] Additionally, new wind or solar power is forecast to be cheaper than new coal-fired power plants by 2022 by the think tank Carbon Tracker. The average Turkish coal-fired power station is predicted to have higher long-run operating costs than new renewables by 2023[116] and all renewables by 2030.[160]

Employment

By the end of 2017, the renewable energy industry employed 84,000 people,[161] whereas coal mining employed 10,000 in 13 public-sector workplaces and 26,000 in 430 private-sector workplaces.[162] In 2019, the minimum wage for coal miners was 4,059 lira (US$700) per month, twice the standard minimum wage.[163]

Due to the complex geology of the Zonguldak basin, hardcoal production in Turkey is insignificant, heavily subsidised and labour-intensive.[164] However, Zonguldak Province is highly dependent on coal:[165] as of 2018, most working men in Zonguldak city were employed in the coal industry.[166] Despite this, as of 2020, Turkey had not implemented a just transition policy, although the government spoke in favor of it in 2015[87] and it is supported by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.[167] Three coal-fired power plants, which are in Muğla Province, Yatağan, Yeniköy and Kemerköy, are becoming outdated. Currently, the old plants need refurbishment to meet forthcoming local air pollution limits. Climate Action Network Europe recommends shutting them down instead of refurbishing them if the subsidies are redeployed locally as the most economically feasible option. However, if the plants and associated lignite mines were shut down, about 5000 workers would need funding for early retirement or retraining.[168] There would also be health[169] and environmental benefits,[170] but these are difficult to quantify as very little data is publicly available in Turkey on the local pollution by the plants and mines.[171][172] Away from Zonguldak mining and the coal-fired power plant employ most working people in Soma district.[173]

gollark: Or maybe gamma, not sure if plutonium emits that much.
gollark: α and β radiation are very easy to block, I think the main issue is just accidentally consuming some of the radioactive stuff.
gollark: Are there not problems with random people having a large enough mass of radioisotopes to cook things?
gollark: The *UK* Queen? Oh bee.
gollark: Also heights, for some weird reason.

See also

Notes
  1. Bituminous coal is called hardcoal (taşkömür in Turkish) in the International Energy Agency document for Turkey and anthracite in Turkish government documents. On Wikipedia, hardcoal redirects to anthracite.
  2. The net calorific value of Turkish lignite is lower than that of typical lignite,[40] varying by power station; its average is about 2,800
  3. Fly ash, a byproduct of the coal refining process, is often sold to cement factories as a raw material.[3] Concentrations of natural radionuclides vary depending on the power station and the product may be safe in building materials depending on the amount used.[48]
  4. 62 megatonnes would be emitted annually[72] if run at the targeted capacity factor, whereas Turkey's current annual emissions are 521 megatonnes.[73] By simple arithmetic 62 megatonnes is more than 10% of 521+62 megatonnes.
  5. On average somewhat over a million tonnes of CO2 was emitted for every TWh of electricity generated in Turkey by coal-fired power stations in 2010.[74] This power station aims to generate just over 12.5 TWh (gross) per year.[75] The calculation in the EIA assumes an emission factor of 94.6 tCO2/TJ,[72] which is three times the average of 31 for Turkish lignite,[76] but it is unclear whether this is the only reason the CO2 emissions per kWh are predicted to be very high compared to the 2010 average. Since 2020, more stringent filtering of local air pollutants from the smokestack has been compulsory.[77] Moreover, although the average is about 2800,[78] the net calorific value of Turkish lignite varies between 1000 and 6000 kcal/kg.[79]
  6. "Metals" described in the 4-b group of Article 2 of the current Mining Law No. 3213 include lignite thus lignite-fired power plants can receive region 5 subsidies regardless of their actual location in Turkey.
  7. In the neighbouring EU, by contrast, state aid to new coal power has been banned since 2019 and will be prohibited to existing coal power by 2025.
  1. 29% of the 521 Mt gross emissions in 2018 or 35% of the 426 Mt net emissions

References
  1. "Total primary energy supply (TPES) by source, Turkey". International Energy Agency. Archived from the original on 1 April 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
  2. "Coal". Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (Turkey). Archived from the original on 17 September 2018. Retrieved 5 January 2020.
  3. "Lignite coal – health effects and recommendations from the health sector" (PDF). Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL). December 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 December 2018. Retrieved 10 January 2019.
  4. Ersoy (2019), p. 5.
  5. "Turkey breaks local coal production record in 2018". Anadolu Agency. 16 January 2019. Archived from the original on 3 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2019.
  6. Di̇reskeneli̇, Haluk (3 January 2020). "Enerji piyasalarında 2020 yılı öngörüleri" [2020 energy market outlook]. Enerji Günlüğü (in Turkish).
  7. "Turkey transfers operating rights of seven coal fields to private companies". Hürriyet Daily News. 12 October 2018. Archived from the original on 12 October 2018. Retrieved 12 October 2018.
  8. "The First Barrow Submarines". rnsubs.co.uk. Archived from the original on 20 November 2019. Retrieved 22 May 2020.
  9. Ayhan, Arda. "The History of Coal in Turkey and the Story of its Origins" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 December 2018. Retrieved 30 November 2018.
  10. Güney, Mehmet (1966). "Underground mining operations in Zonguldak coal mines". Middle East Technical University. Archived from the original on 26 March 2020.
  11. Şengül, H. Tarık; Aytekin, E. Attila (2012), Kirk, John; Contrepois, Sylvie; Jefferys, Steve (eds.), "Zonguldak Coalfield and the Past and Future of Turkish Coal-mining Communities", Changing Work and Community Identities in European Regions: Perspectives on the Past and Present, Identity Studies in the Social Sciences, Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 154–183, doi:10.1057/9780230353916_6, ISBN 9780230353916
  12. Atalay, Figen (2015). "The History of the Coal Mining Industry and Mining Accidents in the World and Turkey". Turkish Thoracic Journal. 16 (Suppl 1): S5–S8. doi:10.5152/ttd.2015.002. ISSN 2148-7197. PMC 5783104. PMID 29404107.
  13. Aytekin, Erden Attila (2001). "Workers of the Ereğli̇-Zonguldak Coal Basin, 1848–1922" (PDF). Bilkent University. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 May 2005.
  14. Kraemer, Richard (16 April 2020). "Diversify and expand: Turkey's drive towards natural gas security". Middle East Institute. Archived from the original on 24 April 2020.
  15. "Turkey shuts power plants for not installing filters – Turkey News". Hürriyet Daily News. Demirören News Agency. 2 January 2020. Archived from the original on 15 May 2020.
  16. "Statistics". Turkish Steel. Archived from the original on 12 April 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  17. "Republic of Turkey Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources – Natural Gas Pipelines and Projects". enerji.gov.tr. Archived from the original on 29 April 2020. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  18. "Total inflow to Turkish gas system down 6.33% in 2019". Daily Sabah. Anadolu Agency. 5 January 2020. Archived from the original on 27 March 2020. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  19. "Household gas consumption slumps by 12.3%, association blames it on global warming!". PA Intelligence. 20 April 2019. Archived from the original on 27 March 2020. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  20. Yar, Yagiz (16 May 2020). "Clean Alternatives For Household Coal - Case Study: Izmir, Turkey". Master's Projects and Capstones.
  21. İşler, Asli; Karaosmanoğlu, Filiz (17–18 June 2008). Traditional Cooking Fuels, Ovens & Stoves in Turkey. Thirty-first IAEE International Conference. Istanbul: International Association for Energy Economics. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  22. "Kömür ve Yakacak Yardımı Başvurusu Nasıl Yapılır? Maddi Yardım 2020" [How to apply for fuel and coal assistance? Material help 2020]. Finans 365 (in Turkish). Retrieved 6 May 2020.
  23. Mentese, Sibel; Mirici, Nihal A.; Otkun, Muserref T.; Bakar, Coskun; Palaz, Elif; Tasdibi, Deniz; Cevizci, Sibel; Cotuker, Osman (1 November 2015). "Association between respiratory health and indoor air pollution exposure in Canakkale, Turkey". Building and Environment. Special Issue: Indoor pollutants, chemistry and health- Selected papers presented at Indoor Air 2014 conference in Hong Kong. 93: 72–83. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.01.023. ISSN 0360-1323. Archived from the original on 1 December 2018. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  24. Can, Günay; Sayılı, Uğurcan; Aksu Sayman, Özden; Kuyumcu, Ömer Faruk; Yılmaz, Duygu; Esen, Eren; Yurtseven, Eray; Erginöz, Ethem (3 January 2019). "Mapping of carbon monoxide related death risk in Turkey: a ten-year analysis based on news agency records". BMC Public Health. 19 (1): 9. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-6342-4. ISSN 1471-2458. PMC 6318903. PMID 30606153.
  25. "Coal overview: Turkey" (PDF). Global Methane Project. 2020.
  26. Collings, Ronald. "Pre-feasibility Study for Coal Mine Methane Drainage and Utilization at the Kozlu Coal Mine in Zonguldak, Turkey" (PDF).
  27. "Turkey's 21st Century Coal Rush". Global Business Reports. Archived from the original on 17 May 2019. Retrieved 17 May 2019.
  28. Ersoy (2019), p. 8.
  29. Ersoy (2019), p. 3.
  30. "Coal mine collapses in Turkey". Trend. 18 February 2019. Archived from the original on 1 March 2019. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  31. "Tender announcements". MAPEG. Archived from the original on 25 February 2019. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
  32. Global Business Reports (2018), p. 37,38.
  33. "MAPEG, Bazı İşlemleri Sadece E-Maden Portalı Üzerinden Kabul Edecek!" [Mining and Oil General Administration: some transactions only accepted via the e-mining portal]. Enerji Portalı (in Turkish). 12 December 2019. Archived from the original on 28 January 2020. Retrieved 28 January 2020.
  34. "2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Turkey". U.S. Embassy & Consulates in Turkey. 12 March 2020. Archived from the original on 12 April 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  35. "Prospects for coal and clean coal technologies in Turkey" (PDF). IEACCC. July 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 January 2019. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
  36. "Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage in the Context of Turkish Energy Market" (PDF). IICEC. June 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 January 2019. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
  37. Ersoy (2019), p. 7.
  38. Oskay, R. G.; Inaner, H.; Karayigit, A. I.; Christanis, K. (2013). "Coal deposits of Turkey: properties and importance on energy demand". Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece. 47 (4): 2111–2120. doi:10.12681/bgsg.11106.
  39. "Turkish government to transfer 203 million mt of coal reserves to private owners". S & P Global. 12 October 2018. Archived from the original on 16 October 2018. Retrieved 16 October 2018.
  40. Turkstat report (2020), p. 50
  41. "Nuclear Power in Turkey | Nuclear Energy In Turkey – World Nuclear Association". www.world-nuclear.org. Retrieved 12 June 2020.
  42. "Energy pricing and non-market flows in Turkey's energy sector" (PDF). SHURA Energy Transition Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 December 2019.
  43. Global Business Reports (2018), p. 35.
  44. Direskeneli, Haluk (2 December 2019). "Turkey: Energy And Infrastructure Forecast 2020 – OpEd". Eurasia Review. Archived from the original on 4 December 2019. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
  45. Global Business Reports (2018), p. 33.
  46. Ersoy (2019), p. 15.
  47. Soil Congress (2019), p. 66.
  48. Ozden, Banu; Güler, Erkan; Vaasma, Taavi; Horváth, Mária; Kiisk, Madis; Kovács, Tibor (August 2018). "Enrichment of naturally occurring radionuclides and trace elements in Yatagan and Yenikoy coal-fired thermal power plants, Turkey". Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 188: 100–107. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.09.016. PMID 28965987.
  49. Uçar, Ali; Şensöğüt, Cem; Ediz, İ Göktay (5 January 2019). "Investıgatıon for Envıronmental Effects and Evaluatıon of Fıne Taılıngs from Tuncbılek Coal Processıng Plant/Turkey". International Journal of Economic and Environmental Geology: 28–34. ISSN 2223-957X. Archived from the original on 12 April 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  50. "Turkey: Rights violations found in mine disaster case". www.aa.com.tr. Archived from the original on 10 March 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  51. Global Business Reports (2018), p. 14,15.
  52. Dursun, Arif Emre (14 July 2020). "Statistical analysis of methane explosions in Turkey's underground coal mines and some recommendations for the prevention of these accidents: 2010–2017". Natural Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-020-04170-x. ISSN 1573-0840.
  53. "Two workers killed in illegal mine collapse in Turkey's Zonguldak". Hürriyet. 8 July 2018. Archived from the original on 31 December 2018. Retrieved 31 December 2018.
  54. ERBOY, Fatma. "Coal Worker's Pneumoconiosis" (PDF). Zonguldak Kara Elmas Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Göğüs Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı, Zonguldak. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 January 2020.
  55. Ugurtas, Selin (17 April 2020). "Coronavirus outbreak exposes health risks of coal rush". Al-Monitor. Archived from the original on 21 April 2020. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
  56. Sarikaya, Selda; Özdolap, Şenay; Gümüştasş, Şenol; Koç, Ülkü (2007). "Low back pain and lumbar angles in Turkish coal miners". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 50 (2): 92–96. doi:10.1002/ajim.20417. PMID 17238134. Archived from the original on 27 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
  57. İnanç Cengiz, Murat; Zengin, Büşra; İçen, Murat; Köktürk, Firüzan (2018). "Prevalence of periodontal disease among mine workers of Zonguldak, Kozlu District, Turkey: a cross-sectional study". BMC Public Health. 18 (1): 361. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5304-1. PMC 5857090. PMID 29548308.
  58. "Polluters exposed by new eye in the sky satellite". 5 July 2018. Archived from the original on 24 October 2018. Retrieved 24 October 2018.
  59. "TROPOMI Level 2 data products". KNMI R&D Satellite Observations. Archived from the original on 24 October 2018. Retrieved 24 October 2018.
  60. EfimovaMazurMigottoRambali (2019), p. 20.
  61. EfimovaMazurMigottoRambali (2019), p. 30.
  62. "Emission standards: Turkey" (PDF). International Energy Agency.
  63. "Sanayi̇ Kaynakli Hava Ki̇rli̇li̇ği̇ni̇n Kontrolü Yönetmeli̇ği̇nde Deği̇şi̇kli̇k Yapilmasina Dai̇r Yönetmeli̇k" [Official Gazette: Changes to industrial air pollution regulation]. Resmî Gazete (29211): Appx 1 page 15. 20 December 2014. Archived from the original on 27 February 2019. Retrieved 22 February 2019.
  64. Sayın, Ayşe (4 December 2019). "Erdoğan'ın veto kararının altında ne yatıyor?" [What lies behind Erdoğan's veto?]. BBC (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 5 December 2019.
  65. "Greenpeace analysis ranks global SO2 air pollution hotspots". Greenpeace International. Archived from the original on 1 September 2019. Retrieved 1 September 2019.
  66. Hava Kirliliği ve Sağlık Etkileri Kara Rapor [Air pollution and health efforts: Black Report] (PDF). 11 May 2019. pp. 52–53. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 June 2019. Retrieved 11 May 2019.
  67. "Turkish minister says coal plants must start using pollution filters in 6 months". Ahval. Archived from the original on 4 December 2019. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
  68. "Covid-19 Quarantine has Cleaned the Air of Turkey, What Should be Done Next?". Bianet. 22 April 2020.
  69. Turkstat report (2020), p. 57.
  70. "ETS Detailed Information: Turkey". International Carbon Action Partnership. Archived from the original on 31 March 2019.
  71. Atilgan, Burcin; Azapagic, Adisa (2016). "An integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation in Turkey". Energy Policy. 93: 177. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.055.
  72. Çınar (2020), p. 319.
  73. "Turkey's greenhouse gas emissions fall for second year in a row". Daily Sabah. Anadolu Agency. 31 March 2020. Archived from the original on 2 April 2020. Retrieved 5 May 2020. Turkey's total greenhouse gas emissions in 2018 ..... equivalent to 520.9 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2).
  74. Atilgan et al (2016), p. 177.
  75. Çınar (2020), p. xix.
  76. Turkstat report (2020), p. 50.
  77. "Turkey shuts power plants for not installing filters". Anadolu Agency. 2 January 2020. Archived from the original on 2 January 2020. Retrieved 5 May 2020.
  78. Yerli̇ ve mi̇lli̇ enerji̇ poli̇ti̇kalari ekseni̇nde kömür [Coal on the axis of local and national energy policies] (PDF) (Report). Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research. January 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 February 2019. Retrieved 13 February 2019.
  79. Turkstat report (2020), pp. 59,60.
  80. "Paving the way for safer and greener coal mine methane management in Turkey and Ukraine". www.unece.org. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  81. "Why is there no lignite market?". Euracoal. 11 September 2014. Archived from the original on 11 May 2020. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
  82. El-Khozondar, Balkess D. J. (2017). ""Investigating the Use of Water for Electricity Generation at Turkish Power Plants"" (PDF). Hacettepe University. p. 84. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 August 2019. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
  83. Özcan, Zeynep; Köksal, Merih Aydınalp; Alp, Emre (2020). Naddeo, Vincenzo; Balakrishnan, Malini; Choo, Kwang-Ho (eds.). "Evaluation of Water–Energy Nexus in Sakarya River Basin, Turkey". Frontiers in Water-Energy-Nexus—Nature-Based Solutions, Advanced Technologies and Best Practices for Environmental Sustainability. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Cham: Springer International Publishing: 421–424. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13068-8_105. ISBN 978-3-030-13068-8.
  84. "The water-energy nexus at rivers can be resolved worldwide by 2050 as a consequence of the energy transition - News - LUT". www.lut.fi. Archived from the original on 13 February 2020. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
  85. "Thermal power plants in Zonguldak and Muğla leave nearby villages without water in the middle of a pandemic". www.duvarenglish.com. 13 April 2020. Archived from the original on 19 April 2020. Retrieved 5 May 2020.
  86. Yucel, Deniz Sanliyuksel (February 2019). "Characterization and comparison of mine wastes in Can Coal Basin, northwest Turkey: a case study".
  87. "Managing the Phase-out of Coal: A Comparison of Actions in G20 Countries" (PDF). Climate Transparency. May 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 May 2019. Retrieved 24 May 2019.
  88. "Turkey energy market research | Turkey data, reports, prices". estore.enerdata.net. Archived from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
  89. Energy Administration (2018)
  90. Kasap, Yaşar; Şensöğüt, Cem; Ören, Özer (1 March 2020). "Efficiency change of coal used for energy production in Turkey". Resources Policy. 65: 101577. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101577. ISSN 0301-4207. Archived from the original on 14 January 2020. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
  91. "Ağustos ayında termik santrallerde 7 milyon 989 bin ton kömür yakıldı" [7 million 989 million tonnes of coal was burnt in power stations in August]. Yeşil Gazete.
  92. "Natural gas share of Turkey's electricity output down over 37% in 2019". Daily Sabah. 21 June 2020.
  93. "Analysis: US met coal may focus on spot buyers, steel output falls | Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide". www.hellenicshippingnews.com. Retrieved 28 July 2020.
  94. "Kardemir Kömür Alımlarına İlişkin Çıkan Haberleri Yalanladı". BRTV (in Turkish). 25 March 2019. Retrieved 3 August 2020.
  95. "İsdemir - Corporate". www.isdemir.com.tr. Retrieved 3 August 2020.
  96. GAZETESİ, PUSULA. "Erdemir, Alacaağzı'nda kömür zenginleştirme tesisi kuracak - Zonguldak Haberler". pusulagazetesi.com.tr (in Turkish). Retrieved 3 August 2020.
  97. "EREĞLİ DEMİR VE ÇELİK FABRİKALARI T.A.Ş". Turkish Steel Producers. 22 March 2017. Retrieved 3 August 2020.
  98. DoukasGençsü (2019), p. 2.
  99. Yildizhan, Hasan (2017). "Incentive policies for coal plants in Turkey". Thermal Science. 21 (5): 1917–1924. doi:10.2298/TSCI160428004Y.
  100. "Wind vs Coal Power in Turkey/Solar PV vs Coal in Turkey" (PDF). Carbon Tracker. 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 March 2020.
  101. "Investment Guide > Investors' Guide > Incentives". Invest in Turkey. Archived from the original on 19 October 2018. Retrieved 19 October 2018.
  102. "Fossil Fuel Support – TUR" Archived 16 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine, OECD, accessed October 2018
  103. "A New Strategy for EU-Turkey Energy Cooperation". Turkish Policy Quarterly. 27 November 2018. Archived from the original on 21 December 2018. Retrieved 21 December 2018.
  104. "Turkish gov't submits draft bill for recovering incentives – Xinhua | English.news.cn". www.xinhuanet.com. Retrieved 11 June 2019.
  105. Öztürk, Sinan (21 January 2020). "Turkey Wealth Fund eyes becoming strategic investment arm of the country". Daily Sabah. Archived from the original on 22 January 2020. Retrieved 2 April 2020.
  106. Carbon Tracker (2020), p. 24.
  107. "Kapasite mekanizmasıyla 2019'da 40 santrale 1.6 milyar lira ödendi" [1.6 billion lira paid to 40 power stations through the capacity mechanism in 2019]. Enerji Günlüğü (in Turkish). 6 February 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  108. "MUÇEP: Muğla'daki tüm termik santraller kapatilmalidir!" [Muğla Environment Platform: All thermal power stations in Muğla must be closed!]. www.milasonder.com (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 4 February 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  109. "Elektri̇k Pi̇yasasi Kapasi̇te Mekani̇zmasi Yönetmeli̇ği̇nde Deği̇şi̇kli̇k Yapilmasina Dai̇r Yönetmeli̇k" [Changes to electricity market capacity mechanism regulations]. Official Gazette. 9 January 2019. Archived from the original on 12 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  110. "TEİAŞ Yayınladı: Kapasite Mekanizması 2020 Yılı Ocak Ayı Ödeme Listesi" [Turkish Electricity Transmission Corporation press release: January 2020 capacity mechanism payments list]. Enerji Ekonomisi (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 23 March 2020. Retrieved 23 March 2020.
  111. "Kömür yerli ama ödemesi dolarla" [The coal is local but payment is in dollars]. Sözcü. 5 February 2019. Archived from the original on 14 February 2019. Retrieved 13 February 2019.
  112. "'Kara elmas'ı gün yüzüne çıkaran kömür firmaları TTK'ye de kazandırıyor" [Coal companies digging out black diamonds also benefit Turkish Hardcoal Enterprises]. www.aa.com.tr. Archived from the original on 5 May 2020. Retrieved 7 May 2020.
  113. Global Business Reports (2018), p. 34.
  114. "About Us". Fina Enerji. Archived from the original on 17 May 2019. Retrieved 17 May 2019.
  115. "Energy". Eren Holding. Archived from the original on 28 December 2018. Retrieved 27 December 2018.
  116. "Powering down coal: Navigating the economic and financial risks in the last years of coal power" (PDF). Carbon Tracker Initiative. November 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 December 2018. Retrieved 23 December 2018.
  117. ""Madenleri olan" değil verimli işleyen kazanır!". Yeni Akit. Archived from the original on 11 January 2019. Retrieved 11 January 2019.
  118. "Sweet dreams are made of this: Turkey's coal to disagree". 350.org. Archived from the original on 20 July 2019. Retrieved 20 July 2019.
  119. Shearer, Christine; Myllyvirta, Lauri; Yu, Aiqun; Aitken, Greig; Mathew-Shah, Neha; Dallos, Gyorgy; Nace, Ted (March 2020). Boom and Bust 2020: Tracking the Global Coal Plant Pipeline (PDF) (Report). Global Energy Monitor. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 March 2020. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  120. "Economic Issues to Weigh on Turkish Market". S & P Global: Platts. 3 January 2019. Archived from the original on 6 January 2019. Retrieved 6 January 2019.
  121. Global Business Reports (2018), p. 9.
  122. Gauthier-Villars, Caitlin Ostroff and David (6 May 2020). "Pressure on Turkey's Economy Builds as Lira Nears Record Low". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on 7 May 2020. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
  123. "One of Turkey's Largest Food Producers Seeks Loan Restructuring". Bloomberg. 23 January 2019. Archived from the original on 7 February 2019. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
  124. Global Business Reports (2018), p. 58.
  125. "A 4th coal power plant for Sri Lanka? – Sri Lanka Latest News". Sri Lanka News – Newsfirst. 29 September 2019. Archived from the original on 3 October 2019. Retrieved 3 October 2019.
  126. "Over 100 and counting". Institute for Energy Economics & Financial Analysis. Archived from the original on 29 March 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  127. EfimovaMazurMigottoRambali (2019), p. 36.
  128. "Turkey sees a sudden spike in Chinese investments through 'Belt and Road Initiative'". Daily Sabah. 30 June 2018. Archived from the original on 24 October 2018. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
  129. "China's power plant project with direct investment in Turkey starts construction". www.xinhuanet.com. Archived from the original on 25 September 2019. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
  130. "Turkey coal imports surge 20% amid lignite plant suspensions". www.montelnews.com. Archived from the original on 23 March 2020. Retrieved 23 March 2020.
  131. "Incentives to speed up returns on Turkish rooftop solar – Latest News". Hürriyet Daily News. Archived from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 21 December 2019.
  132. "Türkiye'nin kömür aşkı bitmiyor" [Turkey's love of coal never ends]. www.sozcu.com.tr (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 7 February 2020. Retrieved 5 March 2020.
  133. "Turkey's daily wind power generation sets record". DailySabah. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
  134. "Updating customs union with EU is priority: Turkish Finance Minister". Hürriyet Daily News. 28 February 2019. Archived from the original on 28 February 2019. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
  135. "Colombian coal producers face disruption with exports". www.drycargomag.com. Archived from the original on 17 April 2020. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
  136. "Bearish mood for US, Colombian participants at Coaltrans event: sources | S&P Global Platts". www.spglobal.com. 21 October 2019. Archived from the original on 1 November 2019. Retrieved 1 November 2019.
  137. "Turkey boosts imports of coking coal from US, Canada". Argus Media. 10 May 2019. Archived from the original on 24 May 2019. Retrieved 24 May 2019.
  138. "US coal rail rates find pressure from low met coal prices, demand | S&P Global Platts". www.spglobal.com. 30 July 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
  139. "Atlantic coking coal: Focus turns to logistics". www.argusmedia.com. 24 March 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
  140. "Dirty fuel: Ukrainian separatists sell pilfered coal to keep the war economy rolling". Washington Post. Retrieved 12 June 2020.
  141. "Russia's Hybrid Strategy in the Sea of Azov: Divide and Antagonize (Part Two)". Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 16 Issue: 18. Jamestown Foundation. Archived from the original on 13 February 2019. Retrieved 13 February 2019.
  142. "Turkey wealth fund chief rebuffs criticism of Erdogan's role". www.ft.com. Archived from the original on 21 February 2020. Retrieved 21 February 2020.
  143. Min. Energy (2020).
  144. Şahin (2019).
  145. Turhan, Ethemcan; Özkaynak, Begüm; Aydın, Cem İskender (2020). Transforming Socio-Natures in Turkey: Landscapes, State and Environmental Movements. ISBN 978-0-429-42969-9.
  146. "Dereköy Yaylası'na maden ocağı girişimi köylüleri ayağa kaldırdı" [Villagers stand up to Dereköy high pasture mine enterprise]. Yeşil Gazete – ekolojik, politik, katılımcı, şenlikli... (in Turkish). 5 February 2020. Retrieved 2 April 2020.
  147. Haber, Korfezgazete. "Hatay'daki Çevre Koruma Dernekleri 305 Maden Sahasının İptalini Talep Etti | Körfez Gazetesi" [Hatay environmental organisations apply to shutdown 305 mines] (in Turkish). Retrieved 2 April 2020.
  148. "Regional Briefings for the 2018 Coal Plant Developers List" (PDF). Coalexit. 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 April 2019. Retrieved 21 December 2018.
  149. "Court says 'environment report necessary' for planned coal mine in western Turkey". Demirören News Agency. 10 August 2018. Archived from the original on 16 October 2018. Retrieved 26 December 2018.
  150. "Climate change: Governments don't act? We do!". Deutsche Welle. 14 December 2018. Archived from the original on 19 December 2018. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
  151. "Termik santralların gerçek bedeli ölüm" [The real cost of thermal power stations is death]. birgun.net (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 31 January 2020. Retrieved 31 January 2020.
  152. "Filtre taktırmayan ve baca gazı arıtma önlemi almayan 5 termik santral tamamen kapatıldı" [Five thermal power stations which did not install filters or flue gas treatment shutdown completely]. 2 January 2020. Archived from the original on 12 January 2020. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
  153. http://m.bianet.org/english/environment/226781-six-coal-fired-plants-continue-to-emit-thick-smoke-after-end-of-suspension
  154. Sartor, O. (2018). Implementing coal transitions Insights from case studies of major coal-consuming economies (PDF). IDDRI and Climate Strategies. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 October 2018. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  155. "Turkey, Germany agree to join forces for new energy, industry projects". Daily Sabah. 26 October 2018. Archived from the original on 27 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
  156. "Spain to close most coalmines in €250m transition deal". The Guardian. 26 October 2018. Archived from the original on 27 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
  157. "Eastern Europe shows how to convert coal to solar". The Fifth Estate. 3 March 2020. Archived from the original on 23 March 2020. Retrieved 23 March 2020.
  158. EfimovaMazurMigottoRambali (2019), p. 40.
  159. EfimovaMazurMigottoRambali (2019), p. 39.
  160. "Powering down coal: Navigating the economic and financial risks in the last years of coal power". Carbon Tracker Initiative. Archived from the original on 1 December 2018. Retrieved 30 November 2018.
  161. "How Turkey Can Ensure a Successful Energy Transition". Center for American Progress. Archived from the original on 20 February 2019. Retrieved 19 February 2019.
  162. "Maden İstatistikleri" [Mining statistics]. MAPEG. Archived from the original on 22 February 2019. Retrieved 22 February 2019.
  163. "Changes to minimum wage, severance payments and administrative fines". Gün and Partners. Archived from the original on 13 February 2019. Retrieved 22 February 2019.
  164. "Turkey: country profile". Euracoal. Archived from the original on 27 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
  165. ERGEN, Mustafa (7 March 2013). A New Methodology Proposal for Urban Regeneration of Brownfield Areas; Case Study of Zonguldak City, Turkey (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
  166. "Absolute darkness: A day in a miner's life". DailySabah. Archived from the original on 20 July 2019. Retrieved 20 July 2019.
  167. "The EBRD's just transition initiative". European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  168. "The Real Costs of Coal: Muğla". Climate Action Network Europe. Archived from the original on 26 January 2019. Retrieved 25 January 2019.
  169. Ugurtas, Selin (17 April 2020). "Coronavirus outbreak exposes health risks of coal rush". Al-Monitor. Archived from the original on 21 April 2020. Retrieved 19 May 2020.
  170. "Beyaz Çamaşır Asılamayan Şehir (ler)" [Cities where washing cannot be hung out to dry]. Sivil Sayfalar (in Turkish). 13 April 2020. Retrieved 19 May 2020.
  171. Welle (www.dw.com), Deutsche. "Turkey: Censorship fogging up pollution researchers' work | DW | 17 September 2019". DW.COM. Archived from the original on 12 April 2020. Retrieved 19 May 2020.
  172. European Commission (2019), p. 93.
  173. "Soma Termik Santrali'nde emisyon oranlarını Bakanlığa anlık bildiren sistem kuruldu". Sabah (in Turkish). Retrieved 24 June 2020.

Sources
  • Efimova, Tatiana; Mazur, Eugene; Migotto, Mauro; Rambali, Mikaela; Samson, Rachel (February 2019). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Turkey 2019. OECD (Report). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews. doi:10.1787/9789264309753-en. ISBN 9789264309760.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.