Artificial photosynthesis

Artificial photosynthesis is a chemical process that biomimics the natural process of photosynthesis to convert sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide into carbohydrates and oxygen. The term artificial photosynthesis is commonly used to refer to any scheme for capturing and storing the energy from sunlight in the chemical bonds of a fuel (a solar fuel). Photocatalytic water splitting converts water into hydrogen and oxygen and is a major research topic of artificial photosynthesis. Light-driven carbon dioxide reduction is another process studied that replicates natural carbon fixation.

Research of this topic includes the design and assembly of devices for the direct production of solar fuels, photoelectrochemistry and its application in fuel cells, and the engineering of enzymes and photoautotrophic microorganisms for microbial biofuel and biohydrogen production from sunlight.

Overview

The photosynthetic reaction can be divided into two half-reactions of oxidation and reduction, both of which are essential to producing fuel. In plant photosynthesis, water molecules are photo-oxidized to release oxygen and protons. The second phase of plant photosynthesis (also known as the Calvin-Benson cycle) is a light-independent reaction that converts carbon dioxide into glucose (fuel). Researchers of artificial photosynthesis are developing photocatalysts that are able to perform both of these reactions. Furthermore, the protons resulting from water splitting can be used for hydrogen production. These catalysts must be able to react quickly and absorb a large percentage of the incident solar photons.[1]

Natural (left) versus artificial photosynthesis (right)

Whereas photovoltaics can provide energy directly from sunlight, the inefficiency of fuel production from photovoltaic electricity (indirect process) and the fact that sunshine is not constant throughout the day sets a limit to its use.[2][3] One way of using natural photosynthesis is for the production of a biofuel, which is an indirect process that suffers from low energy conversion efficiency (due to photosynthesis' own low efficiency in converting sunlight to biomass), the cost of harvesting and transporting the fuel, and conflicts due to the increasing need of land mass for food production.[4] The purpose of artificial photosynthesis is to produce a fuel from sunlight that can be stored conveniently and used when sunlight is not available, by using direct processes, that is, to produce a solar fuel. With the development of catalysts able to reproduce the major parts of photosynthesis, water and sunlight would ultimately be the only needed sources for clean energy production. The only by-product would be oxygen, and production of a solar fuel has the potential to be cheaper than gasoline.[5]

One process for the creation of a clean and affordable energy supply is the development of photocatalytic water splitting under solar light. This method of sustainable hydrogen production is a major objective for the development of alternative energy systems.[6] It is also predicted to be one of the more, if not the most, efficient ways of obtaining hydrogen from water.[7] The conversion of solar energy into hydrogen via a water-splitting process assisted by photosemiconductor catalysts is one of the most promising technologies in development. This process has the potential for large quantities of hydrogen to be generated in an ecologically sound manner. The conversion of solar energy into a clean fuel (H2) under ambient conditions is one of the greatest challenges facing scientists in the twenty-first century.[8]

Two methods are generally recognized for the construction of solar fuel cells for hydrogen production:[9]

  • A homogeneous system is one such that catalysts are not compartmentalized, that is, components are present in the same compartment. This means that hydrogen and oxygen are produced in the same location. This can be a drawback, since they compose an explosive mixture, demanding gas product separation. Also, all components must be active in approximately the same conditions (e.g., pH).
  • A heterogeneous system has two separate electrodes, an anode and a cathode, making possible the separation of oxygen and hydrogen production. Furthermore, different components do not necessarily need to work in the same conditions. However, the increased complexity of these systems makes them harder to develop and more expensive.

Another area of research within artificial photosynthesis is the selection and manipulation of photosynthetic microorganisms, namely green microalgae and cyanobacteria, for the production of solar fuels. Many strains are able to produce hydrogen naturally, and scientists are working to improve them.[10] Algae biofuels such as butanol and methanol are produced both at laboratory and commercial scales. This method has benefited from the development of synthetic biology,[10] which is also being explored by the J. Craig Venter Institute to produce a synthetic organism capable of biofuel production.[11][12] In 2017, an efficient process was developed to produce acetic acid from carbon dioxide using "cyborg bacteria".[13]

History

Artificial photosynthesis was first anticipated by the Italian chemist Giacomo Ciamician during 1912.[14] In a lecture that was later published in Science[15] he proposed a switch from the use of fossil fuels to radiant energy provided by the sun and captured by technical photochemistry devices. In this switch he saw a possibility to lessen the difference between the rich north of Europe and poor south and ventured a guess that this switch from coal to solar energy would "not be harmful to the progress and to human happiness."[16]

During the late 1960s, Akira Fujishima discovered the photocatalytic properties of titanium dioxide, the so-called Honda-Fujishima effect, which could be used for hydrolysis.[17]

The Swedish Consortium for Artificial Photosynthesis, the first of its kind, was established during 1994 as a collaboration between groups of three different universities, Lund, Uppsala and Stockholm, being presently active around Lund and the Ångström Laboratories in Uppsala.[18] The consortium was built with a multidisciplinary approach to focus on learning from natural photosynthesis and applying this knowledge in biomimetic systems.[19]

Research of artificial photosynthesis is experiencing a boom at the beginning of the 21st century.[2] During 2000, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) researchers publicized their intent to emphasize carbon dioxide capture and its conversion to hydrocarbons.[20][21] In 2003, the Brookhaven National Laboratory announced the discovery of an important intermediate part of the reduction of CO2 to CO (the simplest possible carbon dioxide reduction reaction), which could result in better catalysts.[22][23]

Visible light water splitting with a one piece multijunction semiconductor cell (vs. UV light with titanium dioxide semiconductors) was first demonstrated and patented by William Ayers at Energy Conversion Devices during 1983.[24] This group demonstrated water photolysis into hydrogen and oxygen, now referred to as an "artificial leaf" or "wireless solar water splitting" with a low cost, thin film amorphous silicon multijunction cell immersed directly in water. Hydrogen evolved on the front amorphous silicon surface decorated with various catalysts while oxygen evolved from the back metal substrate which also eliminated the hazard of mixed hydrogen/oxygen gas evolution. A Nafion membrane above the immersed cell provided a path for proton transport. The higher photovoltage available from the multijuction thin film cell with visible light was a major advance over previous photolysis attempts with UV sensitive single junction cells. The group's patent also lists several other semiconductor multijunction compositions in addition to amorphous silicon.

One of the disadvantages of artificial systems for water-splitting catalysts is their general reliance on scarce, expensive elements, such as ruthenium or rhenium.[2] During 2008, with the funding of the United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research,[25] MIT chemist and director of the Solar Revolution Project Daniel G. Nocera and postdoctoral fellow Matthew Kanan attempted to circumvent this problem by using a catalyst containing the cheaper and more abundant elements cobalt and phosphate.[26][27] The catalyst was able to split water into oxygen and protons using sunlight, and could potentially be coupled to a hydrogen gas producing catalyst such as platinum. Furthermore, while the catalyst broke down during catalysis, it could self-repair.[28] This experimental catalyst design was considered a major improvement by many researchers.[29][30]

Whereas CO is the prime reduction product of CO2, more complex carbon compounds are usually desired. During 2008, Andrew B. Bocarsly reported the direct conversion of carbon dioxide and water to methanol using solar energy in a very efficient photochemical cell.[31]

While Nocera and coworkers had accomplished water splitting to oxygen and protons, a light-driven process to produce hydrogen is desirable. During 2009, the Leibniz Institute for Catalysis reported inexpensive iron carbonyl complexes able to do just that.[32][33] During the same year, researchers at the University of East Anglia also used iron carbonyl compounds to achieve photoelectrochemical hydrogen production with 60% efficiency, this time using a gold electrode covered with layers of indium phosphide to which the iron complexes were linked.[34] Both of these processes used a molecular approach, where discrete nanoparticles are responsible for catalysis.

During 2009, F. del Valle and K. Domen showed the effect of the thermal treatment in a closed atmosphere using Cd
1-xZn
xS photocatalysts. Cd
1-xZn
xS solid solution reports high activity in hydrogen production from water splitting under sunlight irradiation.[35] A mixed heterogeneous/molecular approach by researchers at the University of California, Santa Cruz, during 2010, using both nitrogen-doped and cadmium selenide quantum dots-sensitized titanium dioxide nanoparticles and nanowires, also yielded photoproduced hydrogen.[36]

Artificial photosynthesis remained an academic field for many years. However, in the beginning of 2009, Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings was reported to be developing its own artificial photosynthesis research by using sunlight, water and carbon dioxide to "create the carbon building blocks from which resins, plastics and fibers can be synthesized."[37] This was confirmed with the establishment of the KAITEKI Institute later that year, with carbon dioxide reduction through artificial photosynthesis as one of the main goals.[38][39]

During 2010, the United States Department of Energy established, as one of its Energy Innovation Hubs, the Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis.[40] The mission of JCAP is to find a cost-effective method to produce fuels using only sunlight, water, and carbon-dioxide as inputs.  JCAP is managed by a team from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), directed by Professor Nathan Lewis and brings together more than 120 scientists and engineers from Caltech and its main partner, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. JCAP also draws on the expertise and capabilities of key partners from Stanford University, the University of California at Berkeley, UCSB, University of California, Irvine, and University of California at San Diego, and the Stanford Linear Accelerator.  Additionally, JCAP serves as a central hub for other solar fuels research teams across the United States, including 20 DOE Energy Frontier Research Center.  The program has a budget of $122M over five years, subject to Congressional appropriation[41]

Also during 2010, a team directed by professor David Wendell at the University of Cincinnati successfully demonstrated photosynthesis in an artificial construct consisting of enzymes suspended in a foam housing.[42]

During 2011, Daniel Nocera and his research team announced the creation of the first practical artificial leaf. In a speech at the 241st National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Nocera described an advanced solar cell the size of a poker card capable of splitting water into oxygen and hydrogen, approximately ten times more efficient than natural photosynthesis.[43] The cell is mostly made of inexpensive materials that are widely available, works under simple conditions, and shows increased stability over previous catalysts: in laboratory studies, the authors demonstrated that an artificial leaf prototype could operate continuously for at least forty-five hours without a drop in activity.[44] In May 2012, Sun Catalytix, the startup based on Nocera's research, stated that it will not be scaling up the prototype as the device offers few savings over other ways to make hydrogen from sunlight.[45] (Sun Catalytix ended up later pivoting away from solar fuel to develop batteries to store energy for the power grid instead, and Lockheed bought the company for an undisclosed amount in 2014[46]) Leading experts in the field have supported a proposal for a Global Project on Artificial Photosynthesis as a combined energy security and climate change solution.[47] Conferences on this theme have been held at Lord Howe Island during 2011,[48] at Chicheley Hall in the UK in 2014[49] and at Canberra and Lord Howe island during 2016.[50]

Current research

In energy terms, natural photosynthesis can be divided in three steps:[9][19]

A triad assembly, with a photosensitizer (P) linked in tandem to a water oxidation catalyst (D) and a hydrogen evolving catalyst (A). Electrons flow from D to A when catalysis occurs.

Using biomimetic approaches, artificial photosynthesis tries to construct systems doing the same type of processes. Ideally, a triad assembly could oxidize water with one catalyst, reduce protons with another and have a photosensitizer molecule to power the whole system. One of the simplest designs is where the photosensitizer is linked in tandem between a water oxidation catalyst and a hydrogen evolving catalyst:

  • The photosensitizer transfers electrons to the hydrogen catalyst when hit by light, becoming oxidized in the process.
  • This drives the water splitting catalyst to donate electrons to the photosensitizer. In a triad assembly, such a catalyst is often referred to as a donor. The oxidized donor is able to perform water oxidation.

The state of the triad with one catalyst oxidized on one end and the second one reduced on the other end of the triad is referred to as a charge separation, and is a driving force for further electron transfer, and consequently catalysis, to occur. The different components may be assembled in diverse ways, such as supramolecular complexes, compartmentalized cells, or linearly, covalently linked molecules.[9]

Research into finding catalysts that can convert water, carbon dioxide, and sunlight to carbohydrates or hydrogen is a current, active field. By studying the natural oxygen-evolving complex (OEC), researchers have developed catalysts such as the "blue dimer" to mimic its function . Photoelectrochemical cells that reduce carbon dioxide into carbon monoxide (CO), formic acid (HCOOH) and methanol (CH3OH) are under development.[51] However, these catalysts are still very inefficient.[5]

Hydrogen catalysts

Hydrogen is the simplest solar fuel to synthesize, since it involves only the transference of two electrons to two protons. It must, however, be done stepwise, with formation of an intermediate hydride anion:

2 e− + 2 H+ ⇌ H+ + H− ⇌ H2

The proton-to-hydrogen converting catalysts present in nature are hydrogenases. These are enzymes that can either reduce protons to molecular hydrogen or oxidize hydrogen to protons and electrons. Spectroscopic and crystallographic studies spanning several decades have resulted in a good understanding of both the structure and mechanism of hydrogenase catalysis.[52][53] Using this information, several molecules mimicking the structure of the active site of both nickel-iron and iron-iron hydrogenases have been synthesized.[9][54] Other catalysts are not structural mimics of hydrogenase but rather functional ones. Synthesized catalysts include structural H-cluster models,[9][55] a dirhodium photocatalyst,[56] and cobalt catalysts.[9][57]

Water-oxidizing catalysts

Water oxidation is a more complex chemical reaction than proton reduction. In nature, the oxygen-evolving complex performs this reaction by accumulating reducing equivalents (electrons) in a manganese-calcium cluster within photosystem II (PS II), then delivering them to water molecules, with the resulting production of molecular oxygen and protons:

2 H2O → O2 + 4 H+ + 4e−

Without a catalyst (natural or artificial), this reaction is very endothermic, requiring high temperatures (at least 2500 K).[7]

The exact structure of the oxygen-evolving complex has been hard to determine experimentally.[58] As of 2011, the most detailed model was from a 1.9 Å resolution crystal structure of photosystem II.[59] The complex is a cluster containing four manganese and one calcium ions, but the exact location and mechanism of water oxidation within the cluster is unknown. Nevertheless, bio-inspired manganese and manganese-calcium complexes have been synthesized, such as [Mn4O4] cubane-type clusters, some with catalytic activity.[60]

Some ruthenium complexes, such as the dinuclear µ-oxo-bridged "blue dimer" (the first of its kind to be synthesized), are capable of light-driven water oxidation, thanks to being able to form high valence states.[9] In this case, the ruthenium complex acts as both photosensitizer and catalyst.

Many metal oxides have been found to have water oxidation catalytic activity, including ruthenium(IV) oxide (RuO2), iridium(IV) oxide (IrO2), cobalt oxides (including nickel-doped Co3O4), manganese oxide (including layered MnO2 (birnessite), Mn2O3), and a mix of Mn2O3 with CaMn2O4. Oxides are easier to obtain than molecular catalysts, especially those from relatively abundant transition metals (cobalt and manganese), but suffer from low turnover frequency and slow electron transfer properties, and their mechanism of action is hard to decipher and, therefore, to adjust.[6]

Recently Metal-Organic Framework (MOF)-based materials have been shown to be a highly promising candidate for water oxidation with first row transition metals.[61][62] The stability and tunability of this system is projected to be highly beneficial for future development.[63]

Photosensitizers
Structure of [Ru(bipy)3]2+, a broadly used photosensitizer.

Nature uses pigments, mainly chlorophylls, to absorb a broad part of the visible spectrum. Artificial systems can use either one type of pigment with a broad absorption range or combine several pigments for the same purpose.

Ruthenium polypyridine complexes, in particular tris(bipyridine)ruthenium(II) and its derivatives, have been extensively used in hydrogen photoproduction due to their efficient visible light absorption and long-lived consequent metal-to-ligand charge transfer excited state, which makes the complexes strong reducing agents.[9] Other noble metal-containing complexes used include ones with platinum, rhodium and iridium.[9]

Metal-free organic complexes have also been successfully employed as photosensitizers. Examples include eosin Y and rose bengal.[9] Pyrrole rings such as porphyrins have also been used in coating nanomaterials or semiconductors for both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis.[6][51]

As part of current research efforts artificial photonic antenna systems are being studied to determine efficient and sustainable ways to collect light for artificial photosynthesis. Gion Calzaferri (2009) describes one such antenna that uses zeolite L as a host for organic dyes, to mimic plant's light collecting systems.[64] The antenna is fabricated by inserting dye molecules into the channels of zeolite L. The insertion process, which takes place under vacuum and at high temperature conditions, is made possible by the cooperative vibrational motion of the zeolite framework and of the dye molecules.[65] The resulting material may be interfaced to an external device via a stopcock intermediate.[66][67]

Carbon dioxide reduction catalysts

In nature, carbon fixation is done by green plants using the enzyme RuBisCO as a part of the Calvin cycle. RuBisCO is a rather slow catalyst compared to the vast majority of other enzymes, incorporating only a few molecules of carbon dioxide into ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate per minute, but does so at atmospheric pressure and in mild, biological conditions.[68] The resulting product is further reduced and eventually used in the synthesis of glucose, which in turn is a precursor to more complex carbohydrates, such as cellulose and starch. The process consumes energy in the form of ATP and NADPH.

Artificial CO2 reduction for fuel production aims mostly at producing reduced carbon compounds from atmospheric CO2. Some transition metal polyphosphine complexes have been developed for this end; however, they usually require previous concentration of CO2 before use, and carriers (molecules that would fixate CO2) that are both stable in aerobic conditions and able to concentrate CO2 at atmospheric concentrations haven't been yet developed.[69] The simplest product from CO2 reduction is carbon monoxide (CO), but for fuel development, further reduction is needed, and a key step also needing further development is the transfer of hydride anions to CO.[69]

Photobiological production of fuels

Some photoautotrophic microorganisms can, under certain conditions, produce hydrogen. Nitrogen-fixing microorganisms, such as filamentous cyanobacteria, possess the enzyme nitrogenase, responsible for conversion of atmospheric N2 into ammonia; molecular hydrogen is a byproduct of this reaction, and is many times not released by the microorganism, but rather taken up by a hydrogen-oxidizing (uptake) hydrogenase. One way of forcing these organisms to produce hydrogen is then to annihilate uptake hydrogenase activity. This has been done on a strain of Nostoc punctiforme: one of the structural genes of the NiFe uptake hydrogenase was inactivated by insertional mutagenesis, and the mutant strain showed hydrogen evolution under illumination.[70]

Many of these photoautotrophs also have bidirectional hydrogenases, which can produce hydrogen under certain conditions. However, other energy-demanding metabolic pathways can compete with the necessary electrons for proton reduction, decreasing the efficiency of the overall process; also, these hydrogenases are very sensitive to oxygen.[10]

Several carbon-based biofuels have also been produced using cyanobacteria, such as 1-butanol.[71]

Synthetic biology techniques are predicted to be useful for this topic. Microbiological and enzymatic engineering have the potential of improving enzyme efficiency and robustness, as well as constructing new biofuel-producing metabolic pathways in photoautotrophs that previously lack them, or improving on the existing ones.[10][71] Another topic being developed is the optimization of photobioreactors for commercial application.[72]

Employed research techniques

Research in artificial photosynthesis is necessarily a multidisciplinary topic, requiring a multitude of different expertise.[10] Some techniques employed in making and investigating catalysts and solar cells include:

Advantages, disadvantages, and efficiency

Advantages of solar fuel production through artificial photosynthesis include:

  • The solar energy can be immediately converted and stored. In photovoltaic cells, sunlight is converted into electricity and then converted again into chemical energy for storage, with some necessary loss of energy associated with the second conversion.
  • The byproducts of these reactions are environmentally friendly. Artificially photosynthesized fuel would be a carbon-neutral source of energy, which could be used for transportation or homes.

Disadvantages include:

  • Materials used for artificial photosynthesis often corrode in water, so they may be less stable than photovoltaics over long periods of time. Most hydrogen catalysts are very sensitive to oxygen, being inactivated or degraded in its presence; also, photodamage may occur over time.[9][73]
  • The cost is not (yet) advantageous enough to compete with fossil fuels as a commercially viable source of energy.[3]

A concern usually addressed in catalyst design is efficiency, in particular how much of the incident light can be used in a system in practice. This is comparable with photosynthetic efficiency, where light-to-chemical-energy conversion is measured. Photosynthetic organisms are able to collect about 50% of incident solar radiation, however the theoretical limit of photosynthetic efficiency is 4.6 and 6.0% for C3 and C4 plants respectively.[74] In reality, the efficiency of photosynthesis is much lower and is usually below 1%, with some exceptions such as sugarcane in tropical climate.[75] In contrast, the highest reported efficiency for artificial photosynthesis lab prototypes is 22.4%.[76] However, plants are efficient in using CO2 at atmospheric concentrations, something that artificial catalysts still cannot perform.[77]

gollark: I use the arrow keys for navigating code a lot.
gollark: Various programming things.
gollark: You don't have backticks? How do you *live*?
gollark: (Three backticks then python)
gollark: ` ` ` python

See also

References
  1. Yarris, Lynn (10 March 2009). "Turning Sunlight into Liquid Fuels: Berkeley Lab Researchers Create a Nano-sized Photocatalyst for Artificial Photosynthesis". Berkeley Lab News Center. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
  2. Styring, Stenbjörn (21 December 2011). "Artificial photosynthesis for solar fuels". Faraday Discussions. 155 (Advance Article): 357–376. Bibcode:2012FaDi..155..357S. doi:10.1039/C1FD00113B. PMID 22470985.
  3. "The Difference Engine: The sunbeam solution". The Economist. 11 February 2011.
  4. Listorti, Andrea; Durrant, James; Barber, Jim (December 2009). "Solar to Fuel". Nature Materials. 8 (12): 929–930. Bibcode:2009NatMa...8..929L. doi:10.1038/nmat2578. PMID 19935695.
  5. Gathman, Andrew. "Energy at the Speed of Light". Online Research. PennState. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
  6. Carraro, Mauro; Sartorel, Andrea; Toma, Francesca; Puntoriero, Fausto; Scandola, Franco; Campagna, Sebastiano; Prato, Maurizio; Bonchio, Marcella (2011). Artificial Photosynthesis Challenges: Water Oxidation at Nanostructured Interfaces. Topics in Current Chemistry. 303. pp. 121–150. doi:10.1007/128_2011_136. ISBN 978-3-642-22293-1. PMID 21547686.
  7. Bockris, J.O'M.; Dandapani, B.; Cocke, D.; Ghoroghchian, J. (1985). "On the splitting of water". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 10 (3): 179–201. doi:10.1016/0360-3199(85)90025-4.
  8. Navarro, R.M.; del Valle, F.; de la Mano, J.A. Villoria; Álvarez-Galván, M.C.; Fierro, J.L.G. (2009). Photocatalytic Water Splitting Under Visible Light: Concept and Catalysts Development. Advances in Chemical Engineering. 36. pp. 111–143. doi:10.1016/S0065-2377(09)00404-9. ISBN 9780123747631.
  9. Andreiadis, Eugen S.; Chavarot-Kerlidou, Murielle; Fontecave, Marc; Artero, Vincent (September–October 2011). "Artificial Photosynthesis: From Molecular Catalysts for Light-driven Water Splitting to Photoelectrochemical Cells". Photochemistry and Photobiology. 87 (5): 946–964. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00966.x. PMID 21740444.
  10. Magnuson, Ann; Anderlund, Magnus; Johansson, Olof; Lindblad, Peter; Lomoth, Reiner; Polivka, Tomas; Ott, Sascha; Stensjö, Karin; Styring, Stenbjörn; Sundström, Villy; Hammarström, Leif (December 2009). "Biomimetic and Microbial Approaches to Solar Fuel Generation". Accounts of Chemical Research. 42 (12): 1899–1909. doi:10.1021/ar900127h. PMID 19757805.
  11. JCVI. "Synthetic Biology & Bioenergy – Overview". J. Craig Venter Institute. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
  12. "Hydrogen from Water in a Novel Recombinant Cyanobacterial System". J. Craig Venter Institute. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
  13. McGrath, Matt (22 August 2017). "'Cyborg' bacteria deliver green fuel source from sunlight". BBC News.
  14. Armaroli, Nicola; Balzani, Vincenzo (2007). "The Future of Energy Supply: Challenges and Opportunities". Angewandte Chemie. 46 (1–2): 52–66. doi:10.1002/anie.200602373. PMID 17103469.
  15. Ciamician, Giacomo (1912). "The Photochemistry of the Future". Science. 36 (926): 385–394. Bibcode:1912Sci....36..385C. doi:10.1126/science.36.926.385. PMID 17836492.
  16. Balzani, Vincenzo; et al. (2008). "Photochemical Conversion of Solar Energy". ChemSusChem. 1 (1–2): 26–58. doi:10.1002/cssc.200700087. PMID 18605661.
  17. Fujishima, Akira; Rao, Tata N.; Tryk, Donald A. (29 June 2000). "Titanium dioxide photocatalysis". Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. 1 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1016/S1389-5567(00)00002-2.
  18. "Swedish Consortium for Artificial Photosynthesis". Uppsala University. Archived from the original on 20 January 2012. Retrieved 24 January 2012.
  19. Hammarström, Leif; Styring, Stenbjörn (27 March 2008). "Coupled electron transfers in artificial photosynthesis". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 363 (1494): 1283–1291. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2225. PMC 2614099. PMID 17954432.
  20. "Scientists Developing "Artificial" Plants". Sciencedaily.com. 28 November 2000. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
  21. "Artificial Photosynthesis". Csiro.au. 20 September 2005. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
  22. "Designing a Better Catalyst for Artificial Photosynthesis". Bnl.gov. 9 September 2003. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
  23. "Designing A Better Catalyst For 'Artificial Photosynthesis'". Sciencedaily.com. 10 September 2003. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
  24. William Ayers, US Patent 4,466,869 Photolytic Production of Hydrogen
  25. Lachance, Molly. "AF Funding Enables Artificial Photosynthesis". Wright-Patterson Air Force Base News. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Archived from the original on 18 February 2012. Retrieved 19 January 2012.
  26. Kanan, Matthew W.; Nocera, Daniel G. (22 August 2008). "In Situ Formation of an Oxygen-Evolving Catalyst in Neutral Water Containing Phosphate and Co2+". Science. 321 (5892): 1072–1075. Bibcode:2008Sci...321.1072K. doi:10.1126/science.1162018. PMID 18669820.
  27. Trafton, Anne. "'Major discovery' from MIT primed to unleash solar revolution". MIT News. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
  28. Lutterman, Daniel A.; Surendranath, Yogesh; Nocera, Daniel G. (2009). "A Self-Healing Oxygen-Evolving Catalyst". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 131 (11): 3838–3839. doi:10.1021/ja900023k. PMID 19249834.
  29. "Solar-Power Breakthrough: Researchers have found a cheap and easy way to store the energy made by solar power". Technologyreview.com. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
  30. Kleiner, Kurt. "Electrode lights the way to artificial photosynthesis". NewScientist. Reed Business Information Ltd. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
  31. Barton, Emily E.; Rampulla, David M.; Bocarsly, Andrew B. (2008). "Selective Solar-Driven Reduction of CO2 to Methanol Using a Catalyzed p-GaP Based Photoelectrochemical Cell". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 130 (20): 6342–6344. doi:10.1021/ja0776327. PMID 18439010.
  32. "Light-Driven Hydrogen Generation System Based on Inexpensive Iron Carbonyl Complexes". AZoNano.com. AZoNetwork. 2 December 2009. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
  33. Gärtner, Felix; Sundararaju, Basker; Surkus, Annette-Enrica; Boddien, Albert; Loges, Björn; Junge, Henrik; Dixneuf, Pierre H; Beller, Matthias (21 December 2009). "Light-Driven Hydrogen Generation: Efficient Iron-Based Water Reduction Catalysts". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 48 (52): 9962–9965. doi:10.1002/anie.200905115. PMID 19937629.
  34. Nann, Thomas; Ibrahim, Saad K; Woi, Pei-Meng; Xu, Shu; Ziegler, Jan; Pickett, Christopher J. (22 February 2010). "Water Splitting by Visible Light: A Nanophotocathode for Hydrogen Production". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 49 (9): 1574–1577. doi:10.1002/anie.200906262. PMID 20140925.
  35. del Valle, F.; Ishikawa, A.; Domen, K. (May 2009). "Influence of Zn concentration in the activity of Cd
    1-x    Zn
    x    S     solid solutions for water splitting under visible light". Catalysis Today. 143 (1–2): 51–59. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2008.09.024.
  36. Hensel, Jennifer; Wang, Gongming; Li, Yat; Zhang, Jin Z. (2010). "Synergistic Effect of CdSe Quantum Dot Sensitization and Nitrogen Doping of TiO2 Nanostructures for Photoelectrochemical Solar Hydrogen Generation". Nano Letters. 10 (2): 478–483. Bibcode:2010NanoL..10..478H. doi:10.1021/nl903217w. PMID 20102190.
  37. "Man-made photosynthesis looking to change the world". Digitalworldtokyo.com. 14 January 2009. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
  38. "The Establishment of the KAITEKI Institute Inc". CSR Environment. mitsubishi.com. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
  39. "Research". The KAITEKI Institute. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
  40. "Home – Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis". Solarfuelshub.org. Retrieved 7 November 2012.
  41. "Caltech-led Team Gets up to $122 Million for Energy Innovation Hub". Caltech Media Relations. 21 July 2010. Archived from the original on 9 August 2011. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
  42. Frogs, Foam and Fuel: UC Researchers Convert Solar Energy to Sugars Archived 9 June 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  43. "Debut of the first practical "artificial leaf"". ACS News Releases. American Chemical Society. Archived from the original on 24 February 2013. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
  44. Reece, Steven Y.; Hamel, Jonathan A.; Sung, Kimberly; Jarvi, Thomas D.; Esswein, Arthur J.; Pijpers, Joep J. H.; Nocera, Daniel G. (4 November 2011). "Wireless Solar Water Splitting Using Silicon-Based Semiconductors and Earth-Abundant Catalysts". Science. 334 (6056): 645–648. Bibcode:2011Sci...334..645R. doi:10.1126/science.1209816. PMID 21960528. S2CID 12720266.
  45. jobs (2012). "'Artificial leaf' faces economic hurdle : Nature News & Comment". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2012.10703.
  46. "The race to invent the artificial leaf".
  47. Faunce TA, Lubitz W, Rutherford AW, MacFarlane D, Moore GF, Yang P, Nocera DG, Moore TA, Gregory DH, Fukuzumi S, Yoon KB, Armstrong FA, Wasielewski MR, Styring S (2013). "Energy and Environment Policy Case for a Global Project on Artificial Photosynthesis". Energy and Environmental Science. 6 (3): 695–698. doi:10.1039/C3EE00063J. S2CID 97344491.
  48. Towards Global Artificial Photosynthesis Lord Howe Island 2011 "Artificial Photosynthesis". Archived from the original on 28 March 2016. Retrieved 7 April 2016. published in Australian Journal of Chemistry Volume 65 Number 6 2012 'Artificial Photosynthesis: Energy, Nanochemistry, and Governance' http://www.publish.csiro.au/nid/52/issue/5915.htm
  49. Do We Need a Global Project on Artificial Photosynthesis? https://royalsociety.org/~/media/events/2014/artificial-photosynthesis/TM0514%20Final%20programme%2027614.pdf?la=en-GB published in Interface Focus Vol 5(3) June 2015 http://rsfs.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/5/3
  50. Global Artificial Photosynthesis- Breakthroughs for the Sustainocene Canberra and Lord Howe island 2016 http://medicalschool.anu.edu.au/towards-the-sustainocene Archived 19 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  51. Kalyanasundaram, K.; Grätzel, M. (June 2010). "Artificial photosynthesis: biomimetic approaches to solar energy conversion and storage". Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 21 (3): 298–310. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2010.03.021. PMID 20439158.
  52. Lubitz, Wolfgang; Reijerse, Eduard; van Gastel, Maurice (2007). "[NiFe] and [FeFe] Hydrogenases Studied by Advanced Magnetic Resonance Techniques". Chemical Reviews. 107 (10): 4331–4365. doi:10.1021/cr050186q. PMID 17845059.
  53. Fontecilla-Camps, Juan C.; Volbeda, Anne; Cavazza, Christine; Nicolet, Yvain (2007). "Structure/Function Relationships of [NiFe]- and [FeFe]-Hydrogenases". Chemical Reviews. 107 (10): 4273–4303. doi:10.1021/cr050195z. PMID 17850165.
  54. Tard, Cédric; Pickett, Christopher J. (2009). "Structural and Functional Analogues of the Active Sites of the [Fe]-, [NiFe]-, and [FeFe]-Hydrogenases". Chemical Reviews. 109 (6): 2245–2274. doi:10.1021/cr800542q. PMID 19438209.
  55. Tard, Cédric; Liu, Xiaoming; Ibrahim, Saad K.; Bruschi, Maurizio; De Gioia, Luca; Davies, Siân C.; Yang, Xin; Wang, Lai-Sheng; et al. (10 February 2005). "Synthesis of the H-cluster framework of iron-only hydrogenase". Nature. 433 (7026): 610–613. Bibcode:2005Natur.433..610T. doi:10.1038/nature03298. PMID 15703741.
  56. Heyduk, Alan F.; Nocera (31 August 2001). "Daniel G.". Science. 293 (5535): 1639–1641. Bibcode:2001Sci...293.1639H. doi:10.1126/science.1062965. PMID 11533485.
  57. Hu, Xile; Cossairt, Brandi M.; Brunschwig, Bruce S.; Lewis, Nathan S.; Peters, Jonas C. (2005). "Electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution by cobalt difluoroboryl-diglyoximate complexes" (PDF). Chemical Communications. 37 (37): 4723–4725. doi:10.1039/B509188H. PMID 16175305.
  58. Yano, Junko; Kern, Jan; Irrgang, Klaus-Dieter; Latimer, Matthew J.; Bergmann, Uwe; Glatzel, Pieter; Pushkar, Yulia; Biesiadka, Jacek; Loll, Bernhard; Sauer, Kenneth; Messinger, Johannes; Zouni, Athina; Yachandra, Vittal K. (23 August 2005). "X-ray damage to the Mn4Ca complex in single crystals of photosystem II: A case study for metalloprotein crystallography". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102 (34): 12047–12052. Bibcode:2005PNAS..10212047Y. doi:10.1073/pnas.0505207102. PMC 1186027. PMID 16103362.
  59. Yasufumi, Umena; Kawakami, Keisuke; Shen, Jian-Ren; Kamiya, Nobuo (5 May 2011). "Crystal structure of oxygen-evolving photosystem II at a resolution of 1.9 Å" (PDF). Nature. 473 (7345): 55–60. Bibcode:2011Natur.473...55U. doi:10.1038/nature09913. PMID 21499260.
  60. Dismukes, G. Charles; Brimblecombe, Robin; Felton, Greg A. N.; Pryadun, Ruslan S.; Sheats, John E.; Spiccia, Leone; Swiegers, Gerhard F. (2009). "Development of Bioinspired 4O4−Cubane Water Oxidation Catalysts: Lessons from Photosynthesis". Accounts of Chemical Research. 42 (12): 1935–1943. doi:10.1021/ar900249x. PMID 19908827.
  61. Binod Nepal; Siddhartha Das (2013). "Sustained Water Oxidation by a Catalyst Cage-Isolated in a Metal–Organic Framework". Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52 (28): 7224–27. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.359.7383. doi:10.1002/anie.201301327. PMID 23729244.
  62. Rebecca E. Hansen; Siddhartha Das (2014). "Biomimetic di-manganese catalyst cage-isolated in a MOF: robust catalyst for water oxidation with Ce(IV), a non-O-donating oxidant". Energy Environ. Sci. 7 (1): 317–322. doi:10.1039/C3EE43040E.
  63. Chemical & Engineering News
  64. Calzaferri, Gion (2010). "Artificial Photosynthesis" (PDF). Topics in Catalysis. 53 (3): 130–140. doi:10.1007/s11244-009-9424-9.
  65. Tabacchi, Gloria; Calzaferri, Gion; Fois, Ettore (2016). "One-dimensional self-assembly of perylene-diimide dyes by unidirectional transit of zeolite channel openings". Chemical Communications. 52 (75): 11195–11198. doi:10.1039/C6CC05303C. PMID 27484884.
  66. Calzaferri, Gion; Méallet-Renault, Rachel; Brühwiler, Dominik; Pansu, Robert; Dolamic, Igor; Dienel, Thomas; Adler, Pauline; Li, Huanrong; Kunzmann, Andreas (2011). "Designing Dye–Nanochannel Antenna Hybrid Materials for Light Harvesting, Transport and Trapping". ChemPhysChem. 12 (3): 580–594. doi:10.1002/cphc.201000947. PMID 21337487.
  67. Tabacchi, Gloria; Fois, Ettore; Calzaferri, Gion (2015). "Structure of Nanochannel Entrances in Stopcock-Functionalized Zeolite L". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 54 (38): 11112–11116. doi:10.1002/anie.201504745. PMID 26255642.
  68. Ellis J.R. (2010). "Tackling unintelligent design". Nature. 463 (7278): 164–165. Bibcode:2010Natur.463..164E. doi:10.1038/463164a. PMID 20075906.
  69. Dubois, M. Rakowski; Dubois, Daniel L. (2009). "Development of Molecular Electrocatalysts for CO2Reduction and H2Production/Oxidation". Accounts of Chemical Research. 42 (12): 1974–1982. doi:10.1021/ar900110c. PMID 19645445.
  70. Lindberg, Pia; Schûtz, Kathrin; Happe, Thomas; Lindblad, Peter (November–December 2002). "A hydrogen-producing, hydrogenase-free mutant strain of Nostoc punctiforme ATCC 29133". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 27 (11–12): 1291–1296. doi:10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00121-0.
  71. Lan, Ethan I.; Liao, James C. (July 2011). "Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for 1-butanol production from carbon dioxide". Metabolic Engineering. 13 (4): 353–363. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2011.04.004. PMID 21569861.
  72. Kunjapur, Aditya M.; Eldridge, R. Bruce (2010). "Photobioreactor Design for Commercial Biofuel Production from Microalgae". Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 49 (8): 3516–3526. doi:10.1021/ie901459u.
  73. Krassen, Henning; Ott, Sascha; Heberle, Joachim (2011). "In vitro hydrogen production—using energy from the sun". Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 13 (1): 47–57. Bibcode:2011PCCP...13...47K. doi:10.1039/C0CP01163K. PMID 21103567.
  74. Blankenship, Robert E.; Tiede, David M.; Barber, James; Brudvig, Gary W.; Fleming, Graham; Ghirardi, Maria; Gunner, M. R.; Junge, Wolfgang; Kramer, David M.; Melis, Anastasios; Moore, Thomas A.; Moser, Christopher C.; Nocera, Daniel G.; Nozik, Arthur J.; Ort, Donald R.; Parson, William W.; Prince, Roger C.; Sayre, Richard T. (13 May 2011). "Comparing Photosynthetic and Photovoltaic Efficiencies and Recognizing the Potential for Improvement". Science. 332 (6031): 805–809. Bibcode:2011Sci...332..805B. doi:10.1126/science.1200165. PMID 21566184. S2CID 22798697.
  75. Armaroli, Nicola; Balzani, Vincenzo (2016). "Solar Electricity and Solar Fuels: Status and Perspectives in the Context of the Energy Transition". Chemistry – A European Journal. 22 (1): 32–57. doi:10.1002/chem.201503580. PMID 26584653.
  76. Bonke, Shannon A.; et al. (2015). "Renewable fuels from concentrated solar power: towards practical artificial photosynthesis". Energy and Environmental Science. 8 (9): 2791–2796. doi:10.1039/c5ee02214b. S2CID 94698839.
  77. Biello, David. "Plants versus Photovoltaics: Which Are Better to Capture Solar Energy?". Scientific American. Retrieved 17 January 2012.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.