2010 United States Census

The United States Census of 2010 was the twenty-third United States national census. National Census Day, the reference day used for the census, was April 1, 2010.[1] The census was taken via mail-in citizen self-reporting, with enumerators serving to spot-check randomly selected neighborhoods and communities. As part of a drive to increase the count's accuracy, 635,000 temporary enumerators were hired.[2][3] The population of the United States was counted as 308,745,538,[4] a 9.7% increase from the 2000 Census. This was the first census in which all states recorded a population of over half a million people as well as the first in which all 100 largest cities recorded populations of over 200,000.

Twenty-third Census of the United States
General information
Country	United States
Total population	308,745,538
Percent change	9.7%
Most populous state	California (37,253,956)
Least populous state	Wyoming (563,826)

Introduction

U.S. President Barack Obama completing his census form in the Oval Office on March 29, 2010.

As required by the United States Constitution, the U.S. census has been conducted every 10 years since 1790. The 2000 U.S. Census was the previous census completed. Participation in the U.S. Census is required by law of persons living in the United States in Title 13 of the United States Code.[5]

On January 25, 2010, Census Bureau Director Robert Groves personally inaugurated the 2010 Census enumeration by counting World War II veteran Clifton Jackson, a resident of Noorvik, Alaska.[6] More than 120 million census forms were delivered by the U.S. Post Office beginning March 15, 2010.[7] The number of forms mailed out or hand-delivered by the Census Bureau was approximately 134 million on April 1, 2010.[8] Although the questionnaire used April 1, 2010 as the reference date as to where a person was living, an insert dated March 15, 2010 included the following printed in bold type: "Please complete and mail back the enclosed census form today."

The 2010 Census national mail participation rate was 74%.[9] From April through July 2010, census takers visited households that did not return a form, an operation called "non-response follow-up" (NRFU).

In December 2010, the U.S. Census Bureau delivered population information to the U.S. President for apportionment, and later in March 2011, complete redistricting data was delivered to states.[1]

Personally identifiable information will be available in 2082.[10]

Major changes

The Census Bureau did not use a long form for the 2010 Census.[11] In several previous censuses, one in six households received this long form, which asked for detailed social and economic information. The 2010 Census used only a short form asking ten basic questions:[11]

1. How many people were living or staying in this house, apartment, or mobile home on April 1, 2010?
2. Were there any additional people staying here on April 1, 2010 that you did not include in Question 1? Mark all that apply: (checkboxes for: children; relatives; non-relatives; people staying temporarily; none)
3. Is this house, apartment, or mobile home – [Checkboxes for owned with a mortgage, owned free and clear, rented, occupied without rent.]
4. What is your telephone number?
5. What is Person 1's name? (last, first)
6. What is Person 1's sex? (male, female)
7. What is Person 1's age and Person 1's date of birth?
8. Is Person 1 of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin? (checkboxes for: "No", and several for "Yes" which specify groups of countries)
9. What is Person 1's race? (checkboxes for 14 including "other". One possibility was "Black, African Am., or Negro")
10. Does Person 1 sometimes live or stay somewhere else? (checkboxes for "No", and several locations for "Yes")

The form included space to repeat some or all of these questions for up to twelve residents total.

In contrast to the 2000 census, an Internet response option was not offered, nor was the form available for download.[11][12]

Detailed socioeconomic information collected during past censuses will continue to be collected through the American Community Survey.[12] The survey provides data about communities in the United States on a 1-year or 3-year cycle, depending on the size of the community, rather than once every 10 years. A small percentage of the population on a rotating basis will receive the survey each year, and no household will receive it more than once every five years.[13]

In June 2009, the U.S. Census Bureau announced that it would count same-sex married couples. However, the final form did not contain a separate "same-sex married couple" option. When noting the relationship between household members, same-sex couples who are married could mark their spouses as being "Husband or wife", the same response given by opposite-sex married couples. An "unmarried partner" option was available for couples (whether same-sex or opposite-sex) who were not married.[14]

Cost

The 2010 census cost $13 billion, approximately $42 per capita; by comparison, the 2010 census per-capita cost for China was about US$1 and for India was US$0.40.[15] Operational costs were $5.4 billion, significantly under the $7 billion budget.[16] In December 2010 the Government Accountability Office (GAO) noted that the cost of conducting the census has approximately doubled each decade since 1970.[15] In a detailed 2004 report to Congress, the GAO called on the Census Bureau to address cost and design issues, and at that time, had estimated the 2010 Census cost to be $11 billion.[17]

In August 2010, Commerce Secretary Gary Locke announced that the census operational costs came in significantly under budget; of an almost $7 billion operational budget:[16]

• $650 million was saved in the budget for the door-to-door questioning (NRFU) phase because 72% of households returned mailed questionnaires;
• $150 million was saved because of lower-than-planned costs in areas including Alaska and tribal lands; and
• the $800 million emergency fund was not needed.

Locke credited the management practices of Census Bureau director Robert Groves, citing in particular the decision to buy additional advertising in locations where responses lagged, which improved the overall response rate. The agency also has begun to rely more on questioning neighbors or other reliable third parties when a person could not be immediately reached at home, which reduced the cost of follow-up visits. Census data for about 22% of U.S. households that did not reply by mail were based on such outside interviews, Groves said.[16]

Technology

In 2005, Lockheed Martin won a six-year, $500 million contract to capture and standardize data for the census. The contract included systems, facilities, and staffing.[18] The final value of that contract was in excess of one billion dollars.[19] Information technology was about a quarter of the projected $11.3 billion cost of the decennial census.[20] The use of high-speed document scanning technology, such as ImageTrac scanners developed by IBML, helped Lockheed Martin complete the project on schedule and under budget.[21]

This was the first census to use hand-held computing devices with GPS capability, although they were only used for the address canvassing operation. Enumerators (information gatherers) that had operational problems with the device understandably made negative reports. During the 2009 Senate confirmation hearings for Robert Groves, President Obama's Census Director appointee, there was much mention of contracting problems but very little criticism of the units themselves.[22] In rural areas there was a problem with transmission of data to and from the HHC. Since the units were updated nightly with important changes and reprogramming, operator implementation of proper procedure was imperative. Dramatic dysfunction and delays were caused if the units were not put into sleep mode overnight. The Census Bureau chose to conduct the primary operation, Non-Response Follow Up (NRFU), without using the handheld computing devices.[23][24]

Marketing and undercounts

Due to allegations surrounding previous censuses that poor people and non-whites are routinely undercounted, for the 2010 census, the Census Bureau tried to avoid that bias by enlisting tens of thousands of intermediaries, such as churches, charities and firms, to explain to people the importance of being counted.[8]

The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) was given a contract to help publicize the importance of the census count and to encourage individuals to fill out their forms. In September 2009, after controversial undercover videos showing four ACORN staffers giving tax advice to a man and a woman posing as a prostitute, the Bureau canceled ACORN's contract.[25] Various American celebrities, including Demi Lovato and Eva Longoria,[26] were used in public service announcements targeting younger people to fill out census forms. Wilmer Valderrama and Rosario Dawson have helped spread census awareness among young Hispanics, a historically low participating ethnicity in the U.S. Census.[27] Rapper Ludacris also participated in efforts to spread awareness of the 2010 Census.[28]

The Census Bureau hired about 635,000 people to find those U.S. residents who had not returned their forms by mail; as of May 28, 2010, 113 census workers had been victims of crime while conducting the census.[3] As of June 29, there were 436 incidents involving assaults or threats against enumerators, more than double the 181 incidents in 2000; one enumerator, attempting to hand-deliver the census forms to a Hawaii County police officer, was arrested for trespassing – the officer's fellow policemen made the arrest.[2]

Some political conservatives and libertarians questioned the validity of the questions and even encouraged people to refuse to answer questions for privacy and constitutional reasons.[29] Michele Bachmann, a former conservative Republican Representative from Minnesota, stated that she would not fill out her census form other than to indicate the number of people living in her household because "the Constitution doesn't require any information beyond that."[30] Former Republican Representative and Libertarian presidential candidate Bob Barr stated that the census has become too intrusive, going beyond the mere enumeration (i.e., count) intended by the framers of the U.S. Constitution.[31] According to political commentator Juan Williams, "Census participation rates have been declining since 1970, and if conservatives don't participate, doubts about its accuracy and credibility may become fatal."[29]

As a result, the Census Bureau undertook an unprecedented advertising campaign targeted at encouraging white political conservatives to fill out their forms, in the hope of avoiding an undercount of this group. The 2010 U.S. Census was the primary sponsor at NASCAR races in Atlanta, Bristol, and Martinsville, and sponsored the No. 16 Ford Fusion driven by Greg Biffle for part of the season, because of a marketing survey that indicated most NASCAR fans lean politically conservative.[29] It also ran an advertisement during the 2010 Super Bowl, and hired singer Marie Osmond, who is thought to have many conservative fans, to publicize the census.[29]

Reapportionment

The 435 seats of the House grouped by state, as apportioned after the 2010 Census

The results of the 2010 census determined the number of seats that each state receives in the United States House of Representatives starting with the 2012 elections. Consequently, this affected the number of votes each state has in the Electoral College for the 2012 presidential election.

Because of population changes, eighteen states had changes in their number of seats. Eight states gained at least one seat, and ten states lost at least one seat. The final result involved 12 seats being switched.[32]

Gained four seats	Gained two seats	Gained one seat	Lost one seat	Lost two seats
Texas	Florida	Arizona Georgia Nevada South Carolina Utah Washington	Illinois Iowa Louisiana Massachusetts Michigan Missouri New Jersey Pennsylvania	New York Ohio

Map of 2010 Reapportionment

Controversies

Some objected to the counting of persons who are in the United States illegally.[33][34] Republican senators David Vitter and Bob Bennett tried unsuccessfully to add questions on immigration status to the census form.[8]

Organizations such as the Prison Policy Initiative argued that the census counts of incarcerated men and women as residents of prisons, rather than of their pre-incarceration addresses, skewed political clout and resulted in misleading demographic and population data.[35]

The term "Negro" was used in the questionnaire as one of the options for African Americans (Question 9. What is Person (number)'s race? ... Black, African Am., or Negro) as a choice to describe one's race. Census Bureau spokesman Jack Martin explained that "many older African-Americans identified themselves that way, and many still do. Those who identify themselves as Negroes need to be included."[36][37] The word was also used in the 2000 Census, with over 56,000 people identifying themselves as "Negro".[38]

The 2010 census contained ten questions about age, gender, ethnicity, home ownership, and household relationships. Six of the ten questions were to be answered for each individual in the household. Federal law has provisions for fining those who refuse to complete the census form.[39]

Detroit Mayor Dave Bing held a press conference on March 22, 2011 to announce that the city would challenge its census results.[40] The challenge, being led by the city's planning department, cited an inconsistency as an example showing a downtown census tract which lost only 60 housing units, but 1,400 people, implying that a downtown jail or dormitory was missed in canvassing.[41]

NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg held a conference on March 27, 2011, to announce that the city would also challenge his city's census results, specifically the apparent undercounting in the boroughs of Queens and Brooklyn.[42] Bloomberg said that the numbers for Queens and Brooklyn, the two most populous boroughs, are implausible.[43] According to the Census, they grew by only 0.1% and 1.6%, respectively, while the other boroughs grew by between 3% and 5%. He also stated that the census showed improbably high numbers of vacant housing in vital neighborhoods such as Jackson Heights, Queens.

The District of Columbia announced in August 2011 that it would also challenge its census results. The Mayor's Office claimed that the detailed information provided for 549 census blocks is "nonsensical", listing examples of census data that show housing units located in the middle of a street that does not actually exist. However, officials do not believe the city's total population will drastically change as a result of the challenge.[44]

Clemons v. Department of Commerce

Main article: Clemons v. Department of Commerce

A 2009 lawsuit, Clemons v. Department of Commerce (see also controversy and history of United States congressional apportionment), sought a court order for Congress to reapportion the House of Representatives with a greater number of members following the census, to rectify under- and over-representation of some states under the so-called 435 rule established by the Apportionment Act of 1911, which limits the number of U.S. Representatives to that number, meaning that some states are slightly underrepresented proportionate to their true population and that others are slightly overrepresented by the same standard. Had this occurred, it would have also affected Electoral College apportionment for the 2012–2020 presidential elections.[45] After the court order was not granted, the plaintiffs appealed the case to the United States Supreme Court, and on December 13, 2010, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction.[46]

State rankings

The state with the highest percentage rate of growth was Nevada, while the state with the largest population increase was Texas.[47] Michigan, the 8th largest by population, was the only state to lose population (although Puerto Rico, a U.S. territory, lost population as well), and the District of Columbia saw its first gain since the 1950s.[48] Note that the resident populations listed below do not include people living overseas. For Congressional apportionment, the sum of a state's resident population and its population of military personnel and federal contractors living overseas (but not other citizens overseas, such as missionaries or expatriate workers) is used.[49]

Population and population change in the United States by state

Rank	State	Population as of 2000 Census	Population as of 2010 Census[50]	Change	Percent change
1	California	33,871,648	37,253,956	3,382,308	10.0%
2	Texas	20,851,820	25,145,561	4,293,741	20.6%
3	New York	18,976,457	19,378,102	401,645	2.1%
4	Florida	15,982,378	18,801,310	2,818,932	17.6%
5	Illinois	12,419,293	12,830,632	411,339	3.3%
6	Pennsylvania	12,281,054	12,702,379	421,325	3.4%
7	Ohio	11,353,140	11,536,504	183,364	1.6%
8	Michigan	9,938,444	9,883,640	−54,804	−0.6%
9	Georgia	8,186,453	9,687,653	1,501,200	18.3%
10	North Carolina	8,049,313	9,535,483	1,486,170	18.5%
11	New Jersey	8,414,350	8,791,894	377,544	4.5%
12	Virginia	7,078,515	8,001,024	922,509	13.0%
13	Washington	5,894,121	6,724,540	830,419	14.1%
14	Massachusetts	6,349,097	6,547,629	198,532	3.1%
15	Indiana	6,080,485	6,483,802	403,317	6.6%
16	Arizona	5,130,632	6,392,017	1,261,385	24.6%
17	Tennessee	5,689,283	6,346,105	656,822	11.5%
18	Missouri	5,595,211	5,988,927	393,716	7.0%
19	Maryland	5,296,486	5,773,552	477,066	9.0%
20	Wisconsin	5,363,675	5,686,986	323,311	6.0%
21	Minnesota	4,919,479	5,303,925	384,446	7.8%
22	Colorado	4,301,261	5,029,196	727,935	16.9%
23	Alabama	4,447,100	4,779,736	332,636	7.5%
24	South Carolina	4,012,012	4,625,364	613,352	15.3%
25	Louisiana	4,468,976	4,533,372	64,396	1.4%
26	Kentucky	4,041,769	4,339,367	297,598	7.4%
27	Oregon	3,421,399	3,831,074	409,675	12.0%
28	Oklahoma	3,450,654	3,751,351	300,697	8.7%
29	Connecticut	3,405,565	3,574,097	168,532	4.9%
30	Iowa	2,926,324	3,046,355	120,031	4.1%
31	Mississippi	2,844,658	2,967,297	122,639	4.3%
32	Arkansas	2,673,400	2,915,918	242,518	9.1%
33	Kansas	2,688,418	2,853,118	164,700	6.1%
34	Utah	2,233,169	2,763,885	530,716	23.8%
35	Nevada	1,998,257	2,700,551	702,294	35.1%
36	New Mexico	1,819,046	2,059,179	240,133	13.2%
37	West Virginia	1,808,344	1,852,994	44,650	2.5%
38	Nebraska	1,711,263	1,826,341	115,078	6.7%
39	Idaho	1,293,953	1,567,582	273,629	21.1%
40	Hawaii	1,211,537	1,360,301	148,764	12.3%
41	Maine	1,274,923	1,328,361	53,438	4.2%
42	New Hampshire	1,235,786	1,316,470	80,684	6.5%
43	Rhode Island	1,048,319	1,052,567	4,248	0.4%
44	Montana	902,195	989,415	87,220	9.7%
45	Delaware	783,600	897,934	114,334	14.6%
46	South Dakota	754,844	814,180	59,336	7.9%
47	Alaska	626,932	710,231	83,299	13.3%
48	North Dakota	642,200	672,591	30,391	4.7%
49	Vermont	608,827	625,741	16,914	2.8%
—	District of Columbia	572,059	601,723	29,664	5.2%
50	Wyoming	493,782	563,626	69,844	14.1%
	United States	281,421,906	308,745,538	27,323,632	9.7%

Metropolitan rankings

These are core metropolitan rankings versus combined statistical areas. For full list with current data, go to Metropolitan Statistics.

The top 25 Metropolitan Statistical Areas of the United States of America

Rank	Metropolitan Statistical Area	2010 Census	Encompassing Combined Statistical Area
1	New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA Metropolitan Statistical Area	19,567,410	New York-Newark, NY-NJ-CT-PA Combined Statistical Area
2	Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area	12,828,837	Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA Combined Statistical Area
3	Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI Metropolitan Statistical Area	9,461,105	Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI Combined Statistical Area
4	Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area	6,426,214	Dallas-Fort Worth, TX-OK Combined Statistical Area
5	Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Metropolitan Statistical Area	5,965,343	Philadelphia-Reading-Camden, PA-NJ-DE-MD Combined Statistical Area
6	Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area	5,920,416	Houston-The Woodlands, TX Combined Statistical Area
7	Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropolitan Statistical Area	5,636,232	Washington-Baltimore-Arlington, DC-MD-VA-WV-PA Combined Statistical Area
8	Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL Metropolitan Statistical Area	5,564,635	Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Port St. Lucie, FL Combined Statistical Area
9	Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA Metropolitan Statistical Area	5,286,728	Atlanta–Athens-Clarke County–Sandy Springs, GA Combined Statistical Area
10	Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH Metropolitan Statistical Area	4,552,402	Boston-Worcester-Providence, MA-RI-NH-CT Combined Statistical Area
11	San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area	4,335,391	San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA Combined Statistical Area
12	Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI Metropolitan Statistical Area	4,296,250	Detroit-Warren-Ann Arbor, MI Combined Statistical Area
13	Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area	4,224,851	Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA Combined Statistical Area
14	Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Metropolitan Statistical Area	4,192,887
15	Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Metropolitan Statistical Area	3,439,809	Seattle-Tacoma, WA Combined Statistical Area
16	Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Metropolitan Statistical Area	3,348,859	Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI Combined Statistical Area
17	San Diego-Carlsbad, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area	3,095,313
18	St. Louis, MO-IL Metropolitan Statistical Area	2,787,701	St. Louis-St. Charles-Farmington, MO-IL Combined Statistical Area
19	Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Metropolitan Statistical Area	2,783,243
20	Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD Metropolitan Statistical Area	2,710,489	Washington-Baltimore-Arlington, DC-MD-VA-WV-PA Combined Statistical Area
21	Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO Metropolitan Statistical Area	2,543,482	Denver-Aurora, CO Combined Statistical Area
22	Pittsburgh, PA Metropolitan Statistical Area	2,356,285	Pittsburgh-New Castle-Weirton, PA-OH-WV Combined Statistical Area
23	Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA Metropolitan Statistical Area	2,226,009	Portland-Vancouver-Salem, OR-WA Combined Statistical Area
24	Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC Metropolitan Statistical Area	2,217,012	Charlotte-Concord, NC-SC Combined Statistical Area
25	San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area	2,142,508

City rankings

See also: List of United States cities by population

Rank	City	State	Population	Land area (square miles)	Population density (per square mile)	Region
1	New York	New York	8,175,133	302.6	27,016.3	Northeast
2	Los Angeles	California	3,792,621	468.7	8,091.8	West
3	Chicago	Illinois	2,695,598	227.6	11,843.6	Midwest
4	Houston	Texas	2,099,451	599.6	3,501.4	South
5	Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	1,526,006	134.1	11,379.6	Northeast
6	Phoenix	Arizona	1,445,632	516.7	2,797.8	West
7	San Antonio	Texas	1,327,407	460.9	2,880.0	South
8	San Diego	California	1,307,402	325.2	4,020.3	West
9	Dallas	Texas	1,197,816	340.5	3,517.8	South
10	San Jose	California	945,942	176.5	5,359.4	West
11	Jacksonville	Florida	821,784	747.0	1,100.1	South
12	Indianapolis	Indiana	820,445	361.4	2,270.2	Midwest
13	San Francisco	California	805,235	46.9	17,169.2	West
14	Austin	Texas	790,390	297.9	2,653.2	South
15	Columbus	Ohio	787,033	217.2	3,623.5	Midwest
16	Fort Worth	Texas	741,206	339.8	2,181.3	South
17	Louisville	Kentucky	741,096	385.09	1,866.3	South
18	Charlotte	North Carolina	731,424	297.7	2,456.9	South
19	Detroit	Michigan	713,777	138.8	5,142.5	Midwest
20	El Paso	Texas	649,121	255.2	2,543.6	South
21	Memphis	Tennessee	646,889	315.1	2,053.0	South
22	Baltimore	Maryland	620,961	80.9	7,675.7	South
23	Boston	Massachusetts	617,594	48.3	12,786.6	Northeast
24	Seattle	Washington	608,660	83.9	7,254.6	West
25	Washington	District of Columbia	601,723	61.0	9,864.3	South
26	Nashville	Tennessee	601,222	475.1	1,265.5	South
27	Denver	Colorado	600,158	153.0	3,922.6	West
28	Milwaukee	Wisconsin	594,833	96.1	6,189.7	Midwest
29	Portland	Oregon	583,776	134.3	4,346.8	West
30	Las Vegas	Nevada	583,756	135.8	4,298.6	West
31	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	579,999	606.4	956.5	South
32	Albuquerque	New Mexico	545,852	187.7	2,908.1	West
33	Tucson	Arizona	520,116	226.7	2,294.3	West
34	Fresno	California	494,665	112.0	4,416.7	West
35	Sacramento	California	466,488	97.9	4,764.9	West
36	Long Beach	California	462,257	50.3	9,190.0	West
37	Kansas City	Missouri	459,787	315.0	1,459.6	Midwest
38	Mesa	Arizona	439,041	136.5	3,216.4	West
39	Virginia Beach	Virginia	437,994	249.0	1,759.0	South
40	Atlanta	Georgia	420,003	133.2	3,153.2	South
41	Colorado Springs	Colorado	416,427	194.5	2,141.0	West
42	Omaha	Nebraska	408,958	127.1	3,217.6	Midwest
43	Raleigh	North Carolina	403,892	142.9	2,826.4	South
44	Miami	Florida	399,457	35.9	11,126.9	South
45	Cleveland	Ohio	396,815	77.7	5,107.0	Midwest
46	San Juan	Puerto Rico	395,326	47.9	8,253.1
47	Tulsa	Oklahoma	391,906	196.8	1,991.4	South
48	Oakland	California	390,724	55.8	7,002.2	West
49	Minneapolis	Minnesota	382,578	54.0	7,084.8	Midwest
50	Wichita	Kansas	382,368	159.3	2,400.3	Midwest
51	Arlington	Texas	365,438	95.9	3,810.6	South
52	Bakersfield	California	347,483	142.2	2,443.6	West
53	New Orleans	Louisiana	343,829	169.4	2,029.7	South
54	Honolulu	Hawaii	337,256	60.5	5,574.5	West
55	Anaheim	California	336,265	49.8	6,752.3	West
56	Tampa	Florida	335,709	113.4	2,960.4	South
57	Aurora	Colorado	325,078	154.7	2,101.3	West
58	Santa Ana	California	324,528	27.3	11,887.5	West
59	Saint Louis	Missouri	319,294	61.9	5,158.2	Midwest
60	Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	305,704	55.4	5,518.1	Northeast
61	Corpus Christi	Texas	305,215	160.6	1,900.5	South
62	Riverside	California	303,871	81.1	3,746.9	West
63	Cincinnati	Ohio	296,943	77.9	3,811.8	Midwest
64	Lexington	Kentucky	295,803	283.6	1,043.0	South
65	Anchorage	Alaska	291,826	1,704.7	171.2	West
66	Stockton	California	291,707	61.7	4,727.8	West
67	Toledo	Ohio	287,208	80.7	3,559.0	Midwest
68	Saint Paul	Minnesota	285,068	52.0	5,482.1	Midwest
69	Newark	New Jersey	277,140	24.2	11,452.1	Northeast
70	Greensboro	North Carolina	269,666	126.5	2,131.7	South
71	Buffalo	New York	261,310	40.4	6,468.1	Northeast
72	Plano	Texas	259,841	71.6	3,629.1	South
73	Lincoln	Nebraska	258,379	89.1	2,899.9	Midwest
74	Henderson	Nevada	257,729	107.7	2,393.0	West
75	Fort Wayne	Indiana	253,691	110.6	2,293.8	Midwest
76	Jersey City	New Jersey	247,597	14.8	16,729.5	Northeast
77	Saint Petersburg	Florida	244,769	61.7	3,967.1	South
78	Chula Vista	California	243,916	49.6	4,917.7	West
79	Norfolk	Virginia	242,803	54.1	4,488.0	South
80	Orlando	Florida	238,300	102.4	2,327.1	South
81	Chandler	Arizona	236,123	64.4	3,666.5	West
82	Laredo	Texas	236,091	88.9	2,655.7	South
83	Madison	Wisconsin	233,209	76.8	3,036.6	Midwest
84	Winston-Salem	North Carolina	229,617	132.4	1,734.3	South
85	Lubbock	Texas	229,573	122.4	1,875.6	South
86	Baton Rouge	Louisiana	229,493	76.9	2,984.3	South
87	Durham	North Carolina	228,330	107.4	2,126.0	South
88	Garland	Texas	226,876	57.1	3,973.3	South
89	Glendale	Arizona	226,721	60.0	3,778.7	West
90	Reno	Nevada	225,221	103.0	2,186.6	West
91	Hialeah	Florida	224,669	21.5	10,449.7	South
92	Chesapeake	Virginia	222,209	340.8	652.0	South
93	Scottsdale	Arizona	217,385	183.9	1,182.1	West
94	North Las Vegas	Nevada	216,961	101.3	2,141.8	West
95	Irving	Texas	216,290	67.0	3,228.2	South
96	Fremont	California	214,089	77.5	2,762.4	West
97	Irvine	California	212,375	66.1	3,212.9	West
98	Birmingham	Alabama	212,237	146.1	1,452.7	South
99	Rochester	New York	210,565	35.8	5,881.7	Northeast
100	San Bernardino	California	209,924	59.2	3,546.0	West

See also

• 2010 in the United States
• United States census

References

1. "Interactive Timeline". About the 2010 Census. U.S. Census Bureau. 2011. Archived from the original on December 20, 2010. Retrieved June 17, 2010.
2. "Census worker taken to court for trespassing". New York Post. Associated Press. July 5, 2010. Archived from the original on January 7, 2017. Retrieved January 6, 2017. The resident continued to refuse to take the Census, and [census worker Russell] Haas said he waited outside a chain-link fence while the resident called his co-workers at the Hawai‘i County Police Department. When police arrived, instead of asking the resident to accept the forms as required by federal law, the officers crumpled the papers into Haas' chest and handcuffed him, Haas said....Haas said he told officers that it was his duty to leave the Census forms with the resident, and that he would leave as soon as he did it. The officers were enforcing state law and had not been trained on the federal Census law, Hawaii County Police Maj. Sam Thomas said.
3. "US Census Takers Attacked on the Job". National Ledger. May 28, 2010. Archived from the original on May 31, 2010. Retrieved May 30, 2010.
4. "U.S. Census Bureau Announces 2010 Census Population Counts – Apportionment Counts Delivered to President" (Press release). United States Census Bureau. December 21, 2010. Archived from the original on December 24, 2010. Retrieved January 9, 2011.
5. Selby, W. Gardner. "Americans must answer U.S. Census Bureau survey by law, though agency has not prosecuted since 1970" (January 9, 2014). politifact.com. Archived from the original on January 7, 2017. Retrieved January 6, 2017.
6. D'oro, Rachel (January 25, 2010). "Remote Alaska village is first eyed in census". The Denver Post. Noorvik, Alaska. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 7, 2017. Retrieved January 6, 2017.
7. "2010 Census forms arrive, kicking off once-a-decade head count". NJ.com. March 15, 2010. Archived from the original on May 24, 2017. Retrieved January 6, 2017.
8. "Stand up and be counted". The Economist. March 31, 2010. Archived from the original on May 25, 2017. Retrieved January 6, 2017.
9. "Take 10 Map 2010 Census Participation Census Bureau". Archived from the original on August 20, 2010. Retrieved August 10, 2010.
10. PIO, US Census Bureau, Census History Staff. "The "72-Year Rule" – History – U.S. Census Bureau". www.census.gov. Archived from the original on April 16, 2019. Retrieved October 26, 2015.
11. "Frequently Asked Questions" (PDF). 2010 Census. U.S. Census Bureau. May 10, 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 14, 2011. Retrieved June 17, 2011.
12. Castro, Daniel (February 2008). "e-Census Unplugged: Why Americans Should Be Able to Complete the Census Online" (PDF). Washington, D.C.: Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 4, 2010. Retrieved March 29, 2010.
13. "Chapter 4: Sample Design and Selection" (PDF). ACS Design and Methodology. U.S. Census Bureau. December 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 20, 2011. Retrieved June 17, 2011.
14. "LGBT Fact Sheet" (PDF). 2010.census.gov. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 28, 2010. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
15. "Censuses: Costing the count". The Economist. June 2, 2011. Archived from the original on June 10, 2011. Retrieved June 17, 2011.
16. "Census Bureau comes in under budget for 2010 operational costs". CNN. August 10, 2010. Archived from the original on November 9, 2012. Retrieved August 10, 2010.
17. "2010 Census: Cost and Design Issues Need to Be Addressed Soon (GAO-04-37)" (PDF) (GAO-04-37). Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. January 15, 2004. OCLC 54778614. Archived from the original on January 7, 2010. Retrieved December 27, 2009. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
18. Mosquera, Mary (October 3, 2005). [harps://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/02/AR2005100201032.html "Lockheed Gets Census Job"]. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved September 28, 2015.
19. 2010 CENSUS PLANNING MEMORANDA SERIES No 195 (PDF) (Report). May 22, 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 24, 2016. Retrieved February 10, 2016.
20. Sternstein, Aliya (June 13, 2005). "Preparing for a decennial task". Federal Computer Week. Falls Church, Virginia: 1105 Media. Archived from the original on October 3, 2011. Retrieved December 27, 2009.
21. "IBML Scanning Platform Helps Lockheed Martin Team Complete 2010 Census Project On Schedule, Under Budget" Archived January 8, 2015, at the Wayback Machine. Health IT Outcomes. Retrieved January 20, 2015.
22. Chan, Wade-Hahn (March 28, 2008). "Have feds cheapened contract bonuses?". FCW. Archived from the original on August 26, 2012. Retrieved August 9, 2013.
23. "Press Releases". Harris.com. Archived from the original on April 20, 2016. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
24. "U.S. Census Bureau – Use of Global Positioning Systems (GPS)". Ask.census.gov. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
25. Sherman, Jake (September 12, 2009). "Census Bureau Cuts Its Ties With Acorn". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on September 15, 2009. Retrieved June 17, 2011.
26. "Demi Lovato And Eva Longoria Urge Census Participation". Looktothestars.org. March 19, 2010. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
27. "Rosario Dawson, Wilmer Valderrama Encourage Latinos To Complete 2010 Census In New PSA's". icelebz.com. Archived from the original on February 21, 2010. Retrieved April 28, 2010.
28. "Ludacris 2010 Census Campaign In New York". Killerhiphop.com. Archived from the original on June 20, 2017. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
29. Williams, Juan (March 1, 2010). "Marketing the 2010 census with a conservative-friendly face". Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 24, 2010. Retrieved March 25, 2011.
30. Swami, Perana (June 18, 2009). "Rep. Bachmann Refuses To Fill Out 2010 Census". Political Hotsheet. CBS News. Archived from the original on September 9, 2012. Retrieved April 15, 2010.
31. "Census goes too far with children". Atlanta Journal Constitution. Archived from the original on September 11, 2009. Retrieved September 8, 2009.
32. "Apportionment Population and Number of Representatives, By State: 2010 Census" (PDF). US Census. December 21, 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 24, 2011. Retrieved December 21, 2010.
33. Baker, John S.; Stonecipher, Elliott (August 9, 2009). "Our Unconstitutional Census". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on September 5, 2015. Retrieved August 9, 2009.
34. "Census 2010: Latino Pastors Urge Census Boycott". Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 30, 2011. Retrieved April 22, 2009.
35. Lotke, Eric; Wagner, Peter (Spring 2004). "Prisoners of the Census: Electoral and Financial Consequences of Counting Prisoners Where They Go, Not Where They Come From" (PDF). Pace Law Review. White Plains, NY: Pace Law School. 24 (2): 587–607. ISSN 0272-2410. Archived from the original on July 14, 2014. Retrieved June 10, 2014. Originally presented at Prison Reform Revisited: a symposium held at Pace University School of Law and the New York State Judicial Institute, Oct. 16–18, 2003. Research supported by grants from the Soros Justice Fellowship Program of the Open Society Institute. Retrieved January 2, 2010.
36. "U.S. Census Bureau interactive form, Question 9". Archived from the original on January 8, 2010. Retrieved January 8, 2010.
37. McFadden, Katie; McShane, Larry (January 6, 2010). "Use of word Negro on 2010 census forms raises memories of Jim Crow". NYDailyNews.com. Archived from the original on January 9, 2010. Retrieved January 8, 2010.
38. Kiviat, Barbara (January 23, 2010). "Should the Census Be Asking People if They Are Negro?". Time. Archived from the original on January 26, 2010. Retrieved February 7, 2010.
39. Frequently Asked Questions on the National Census Archived August 13, 2013, at the Wayback Machine from the ACLU website
40. Cwiek, Sarah (March 22, 2011). "Bing plans to challenge Detroit census numbers". MichiganRadio.com. Archived from the original on August 21, 2011. Retrieved June 15, 2011.
41. Davidson, Kate (May 2, 2011). "Detroit census challenge". MichiganRadio.com. Archived from the original on August 21, 2011. Retrieved June 15, 2011.
42. NYC To File Formal Challenge to 2010 Census under Count Question Resolution Process "Archived copy". Archived from the original on March 30, 2011. Retrieved March 31, 2011.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
43. On the 2010 Census Results Archived May 28, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
44. DeBonis, Mike (August 10, 2011). "District challenges its 2010 Census count". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 11, 2011. Retrieved August 14, 2011.
45. "Apportionment.US – The Case". Apportionment.us. Archived from the original on August 11, 2011. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
46. "Supreme Court orders for December 13, 2010" (PDF). Supremecourt.gov. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 6, 2017. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
47. "Texas Adds Four Congressional Seats as State's Hispanic Population Grows". Bloomberg.com. December 21, 2010. Archived from the original on February 2, 2014. Retrieved October 12, 2017.(subscription required)
48. "USA Today 2010 Census". Usatoday.com. Archived from the original on March 9, 2011. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
49. "Congressional Apportionment" (PDF). Census.gov. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 15, 2018. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
50. "Resident Population Data: Population Change". United States Census Bureau. December 23, 2010. Archived from the original on December 25, 2010. Retrieved December 23, 2010.

External links

• 2010 Census
• 2010 United States Census Form
• U.S. Census Bureau
• The 2010 Census: Winners and Losers – slideshow by Life magazine
• How to deep link into US Census Bureau FactFinder2, see FactFinder2 info
• Census: As Red States Grow, So Do Hispanic Populations Within – video report by Democracy Now!