Sauria

The clade Sauria was traditionally a suborder for lizards which, before 1800, were crocodilians. It has been redefined as the group containing the most recent common ancestor of archosaurs and lepidosaurs and all its descendants;[1] as such it was commonly thought that Sauria is a crowned-base grouping of diapsids.[2] However, recent genomic studies[3][4][5] and comprehensive studies in the fossil record[6] suggest that turtles are closely related to archosaurs, not to parareptiles as previously thought. Sauria can be seen as a crowned-group of all modern reptiles (including birds) within the larger total group Sauropsida, which also contains various stem-reptile groups.

Saurians
Temporal range: GuadalupianPresent, 265.8–0 Ma
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Clade: Neodiapsida
Clade: Sauria
Macartney, 1802
Groups

Systematics

Synapomorphies

The synapomorphies or characters that unite the clade Sauria also help them be distinguished from stem-saurians in Diapsida or stem-reptiles in clade Sauropsida in the following categories based on the following regions of the body.[7][8][9]

  • Cephalad Region
    • Dorsal origin of temporal musculature
    • Loss of caniniform region in maxillary tooth row
    • External nares close to the midline
    • Postparietal absent
    • Squamosal mainly restricted to top of skull
    • The occipital flange of the squamosal is little exposed on the occiput
    • Anterior process of squamosal narrow
    • Quadrate exposed laterally
    • Unossified dorsal process of stapes
    • Stapes slender
  • Trunk Region
    • Sacral ribs oriented laterally
    • Ontogenetic fusion of caudal ribs
    • Trunk ribs mostly single headed
  • Pectoral Region
    • Cleithrum absent
  • Pelvic Region
    • Modified ilium
  • Limb Region
    • Tubular bone lost
    • Entepicondylar foramen absent
    • Radius as long as ulna
    • Small proximal carpals and tarsal
    • Fifth distal tarsal absent
    • Short and stout fifth or hooked metatarsal
    • Perforating foramen of manus lost

However, some of these characters might be lost or modified in several lineages, particularly among birds and turtles; it is best to see these characters as the ancestral features that were present in the ancestral saurian.[7]

Phylogeny

The cladogram shown below follows the most likely result found by an analysis of turtle relationships using both fossil and genetic evidence by M.S. Lee, in 2013. This study found Eunotosaurus, usually regarded as a turtle relative, to be only very distantly related to turtles in the clade Parareptilia.[6]

Diapsida

Araeoscelidia

Neodiapsida

Claudiosaurus

Younginiformes

Sauria

Lepidosauromorpha

 Archosauromorpha  (=Archelosauria)

Choristodera

Prolacertiformes

Trilophosaurus

Rhynchosauria

Archosauriformes

 Pantestudines 

Eosauropterygia

Placodontia

Sinosaurosphargis

Odontochelys

 Testudinata 

Proganochelys

Testudines

The cladogram below follows the most likely result found by another analysis of turtle relationships, this one using only fossil evidence, published by Rainer Schoch and Hans-Dieter Sues in 2015. This study found Eunotosaurus to be an actual early stem-turtle, though other versions of the analysis found weak support for it as a parareptile.[10]

Sauria  (=Archelosauria)

Archosauromorpha

 Lepidosauromorpha  (=Ankylopoda)

Kuehneosauridae

Lepidosauria

Squamata

Rhynchocephalia

 Pantestudines 

Eosauropterygia

Sinosaurosphargis

Placodontia

Eunotosaurus

Pappochelys

Odontochelys

 Testudinata 

Proganochelys

Testudines

gollark: And will deploy HITCHHIKING GNOME protocols.
gollark: With you.
gollark: I disagree then.
gollark: And with SPACE COURT.
gollark: I agree with heav.

References

  1. Gauthier, J. A., Kluge, A. G., & Rowe, T. (1988). The early evolution of the Amniota. The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, 1, 103-155.
  2. Ezcurra, M. D.; Scheyer, T. M.; Butler, R. J. (2014). "The origin and early evolution of Sauria: reassessing the Permian saurian fossil record and the timing of the crocodile-lizard divergence". PLOS ONE. 9 (2): e89165. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089165. PMC 3937355. PMID 24586565.
  3. Wang, Zhuo (27 March 2013). "The draft genomes of soft-shell turtle and green sea turtle yield insights into the development and evolution of the turtle-specific body plan". Nature Genetics. 45 (701–706): 701–6. doi:10.1038/ng.2615. PMC 4000948. PMID 23624526.
  4. Crawford, Nicholas G., et al. "More than 1000 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs." Biology letters 8.5 (2012): 783-786.
  5. Jarvis, E.D.; et al. (2014). "Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds". Science. 346 (6215): 1320–1331. doi:10.1126/science.1253451. PMC 4405904. PMID 25504713.
  6. Lee, M. S. Y. (2013). "Turtle origins: Insights from phylogenetic retrofitting and molecular scaffolds". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 26 (12): 2729–2738. doi:10.1111/jeb.12268. PMID 24256520.
  7. Pough, F. H., Janis, C. M., & Heiser, J. B. (2005). Vertebrate life. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  8. Laurin, Michel and Jacques A. Gauthier. 2011. Diapsida. Lizards, Sphenodon, crocodylians, birds, and their extinct relatives. Version 20 April 2011. http://tolweb.org/Diapsida/14866/2011.04.20 in The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org/
  9. Laurin, Michel and Jacques A. Gauthier. 2011. Autapomorphies of Diapsid Clades. Version 20 April 2011. http://tolweb.org/accessory/Autapomorphies_of_Diapsid_Clades?acc_id=465 in The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org/
  10. Schoch, Rainer R.; Sues, Hans-Dieter (24 June 2015). "A Middle Triassic stem-turtle and the evolution of the turtle body plan". Nature. 523 (7562): 584–587. doi:10.1038/nature14472. PMID 26106865.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.