Odd-toed ungulate

Odd-toed ungulates, mammals which constitute the taxonomic order Perissodactyla (from the Ancient Greek περισσός perissós, "uneven"; and δάκτυλος dáktylos, "finger, toe"), are hoofed animals—ungulates—which bear most of their weight on one (an odd number) of the five toes: the third toe. The non-weight-bearing toes are either present, absent, vestigial, or positioned posteriorly. By contrast, the even-toed ungulates bear most of their weight equally on two (an even number) of the five toes: their third and fourth toes. Another difference between the two is that odd-toed ungulates digest plant cellulose in their intestines rather than in one or more stomach chambers as the even-toed ungulates do.

Odd-toed ungulates
Temporal range: 56–0 Ma Paleocene–Holocene
Clockwise from left: plains zebra (Equus quagga), Indian rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) and Brazilian tapir (Tapirus terrestris)
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Clade: Ungulata
Order: Perissodactyla
Owen, 1848
The white rhinoceros is the largest living perissodactyl

The order includes about 17 species divided into three families: Equidae (horses, asses, and zebras), Rhinocerotidae (rhinoceroses), and Tapiridae (tapirs).

Despite their very different appearances, they were recognized as related families in the 19th century by the zoologist Richard Owen, who also coined the order name.

Anatomy

The largest odd-toed ungulates are rhinoceroses, and the extinct Paraceratherium, a hornless rhino from the Oligocene, is considered one of the largest land mammals of all time.[1] At the other extreme, an early member of the order, the prehistoric horse Eohippus, had a withers height of only 30 to 60 cm (12 to 24 in).[2] Apart from dwarf varieties of the domestic horse and donkey, perissodactyls reach a body length of 180–420 cm (71–165 in) and a weight of 150 to 4,500 kg (330 to 9,920 lb).[3] While rhinos have only sparse hair and exhibit a thick epidermis, tapirs and horses have dense, short coats. Most species are grey or brown, although zebras and young tapirs are striped.

Limbs

The main axes of both the front and rear feet pass through the third toe, which is always the largest. The remaining toes have been reduced in size to varying degrees. Tapirs, which are adapted to walking on soft ground, have four toes on their fore feet and three on their hind feet. Living rhinos have three toes on both the front and hind feet. Modern equines possess only a single toe; however, their feet are equipped with hooves, which almost completely cover the toe. Rhinos and tapirs, by contrast, have hooves covering only the leading edge of the toes, with the bottom being soft.

The ulnae and fibulae are reduced in horses. A common feature that clearly distinguishes this group from other mammals is the saddle-shaped ankle between the astragalus and the scaphoid, which greatly restricts the mobility of the foot. The thigh is relatively short, and the clavicle is absent.

Skull and teeth
Tapirs are the only extant group of perissodactyls with a trunk.

Odd-toed ungulates have a long upper jaw with an extended diastema between the front and cheek teeth, giving them an elongated head. The various forms of snout between families are due to differences in the form of the premaxilla. The lacrimal bone has projecting cusps in the eye sockets and a wide contact with the nasal bone. The temporomandibular joint is high and the mandible is enlarged.

Rhinos have one or two horns made of agglutinated keratin, unlike the horns of even-toed ungulates, which have a bony core.

The number and form of the teeth vary according to diet. The incisors and canines can be very small or completely absent, as in the two African species of rhinoceros. In the horses, usually only the males possess canines. The surface shape and height of the molars is heavily dependent on whether soft leaves or hard grass makes up the main component of their diets. Three or four cheek teeth are present on each jaw half, so the dental formula of odd-toed ungulates is: 0-3 . 0-1 . 2-4 . 31-3 . 1 . 2-4 . 3 × 2 = 30-44

Gut

All perissodactyls are hindgut fermenters. In contrast to ruminants, hindgut fermenters store digested food that has left the stomach in an enlarged cecum, where the food is digested by bacteria. No gallbladder is present. The stomach of perissodactyls is simply built, while the cecum accommodates up to 90 l (24 US gal) in horses. The intestine is very long, reaching up to 26 m (85 ft) in horses. Extraction of nutrients from food is relatively inefficient, which probably explains why no odd-toed ungulates are small; for large animals, nutritional requirements per unit of body weight are lower and the surface-area-to-volume ratio is smaller.

Distribution
Restriction of their habitat and poaching threaten the survival of most rhino species, including the Indian rhinoceros shown here

The present distribution of most perissodactyl species is only a small fraction of their original range. Members of this group are now found only in Central and South America, eastern and southern Africa, and central, southern, and southeastern Asia. During the peak of odd-toed ungulate existence, from the Eocene to the Oligocene, perissodactyls were distributed over much of the globe, the only exceptions being Australia and Antarctica. Horses and tapirs arrived in South America after the formation of the Isthmus of Panama in the Pliocene, around 3 million years ago. In North America, they died out around 10,000 years ago, while in Europe, the tarpans disappeared in the 19th century. Hunting and habitat restriction have reduced the present-day species to fragmented relict populations. In contrast, domesticated horses and donkeys have gained a worldwide distribution, and feral animals of both species are now also found in regions outside of their original range, such as in Australia.

Lifestyle and diet

Perissodactyls inhabit a number of different habitats, leading to different lifestyles. Tapirs are solitary and inhabit mainly tropical rainforests. Rhinos tend to live alone in rather dry savannas, and in Asia, wet marsh or forest areas. Horses inhabit open areas such as grasslands, steppes, or semi-deserts, and live together in groups. Odd-toed ungulates are exclusively herbivores that feed, to varying degrees, on grasses, leaves, and other plant parts. A distinction is often made between primarily grass feeders (white rhinos, equines) and leaf feeders (tapirs, other rhinos).

Reproduction and development
A young Brazilian tapir

Odd-toed ungulates are characterized by a long gestation period and a small litter size, usually delivering a single young. The gestation period is 330–500 days, being longest in the rhinos. Newborn perissodactyls are precocial;[4] young horses can follow the mother after a few hours.[5] The young are nursed for a relatively long time, often into their second year, reaching sexual maturity around eight or ten years old. Perissodactyls are long-lived, with several species reaching an age of almost 50 years in captivity.

Taxonomy
See also: List of Perissodactyla taxa

Outer taxonomy

Traditionally, the odd-toed ungulates were classified with other mammals such as artiodactyls, hyraxes, mammals with a proboscis, and other "ungulates". A close family relationship with hyraxes was suspected based on similarities in the construction of the ear and the course of the carotid artery.

Recent molecular genetic studies, however, have shown the ungulates to be polyphyletic, meaning that in some cases the similarities are the result of convergent evolution rather than common ancestry. Elephants and hyraxes are now considered to belong to Afrotheria, so are not closely related to the perissodactyls. These, in turn, are in the Laurasiatheria, a superorder that had its origin in the former supercontinent Laurasia. Molecular genetic findings suggest that the cloven Artiodactyla (containing the cetaceans as a deeply nested subclade) are the sister taxon of the Perissodactyla; together, the two groups form the Euungulata.[6] More distant are the bats (Chiroptera) and Ferae (a common taxon of carnivorans, Carnivora, and pangolins, Pholidota).[7] In a discredited alternative scenario, a close relationship exists between perissodactyls, carnivores, and bats, this assembly comprising the Pegasoferae.[8]

Internal taxonomy of the Euungulata after Welker et al. 2015[9]
 Euungulata 
 

 Artiodactyla (Even-toed ungulates and cetaceans)

 
 Panperissodactyla 
 

 Perissodactyla (Odd-toed ungulates)

 
 

 †Meridiungulata (South American ungulates,
    especially Notoungulata and Litopterna)

 
 
 

According to studies published in March 2015, odd-toed ungulates are in a close family relationship with at least some of the so-called Meridiungulata, a very diverse group of mammals living from the Paleocene to the Pleistocene in South America, whose systematic unity is largely unexplained. Some of these were classified on the basis of their paleogeographic distribution. However, a close relationship can be worked out to perissodactyls by means of protein sequencing and comparison with fossil collagen from remnants of phylogenetically young members of the Meridiungulata (specifically Macrauchenia from the Litopterna and Toxodon from the Notoungulata). Both kinship groups, the odd-toed ungulates and the Litopterna-Notoungulata, are now in the higher-level taxon of Panperissodactyla. This kinship group is included among the Euungulata which also contains the even-toed ungulates and whales (Artiodactyla). The separation of the Litopterna-Notoungulata group from the perissodactyls probably took place before the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event. "Condylarths" can probably be considered the starting point for the development of the two groups, as they represent a heterogeneous group of primitive ungulates that mainly inhabited the northern hemisphere in the Paleogene.[9][10]

Modern members

Odd-toed ungulates (Perissodactyla) comprise three living families with around 17 species—in the horse the exact count is still controversial. Rhinos and tapirs are more closely related to each other than to the horses. The separation of horses from other perissodactyls took place according to molecular genetic analysis in the Paleocene some 56 million years ago, while the rhinos and tapirs split off in the lower-middle Eocene, about 47 million years ago.

Internal relationships of extant Perissodactyla[11][12][13]
 Perissodactyla 
 
 Equidae
 

 Equus ferus

 
 
 

 Equus asinus

 
 
 
 

 Equus kiang

 
 

 Equus hemionus

 
 
 
 

 Equus zebra

 
 
 

 Equus quagga

 
 

 Equus grevyi

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Tapiridae
 

 Tapirus indicus

 
 
 

 Tapirus bairdii

 
 
 

 Tapirus kabomani

 
 
 

 Tapirus pinchaque

 
 

 Tapirus terrestris

 
 
 
 
 
 Rhinocerotidae
 
 
 

 Rhinoceros unicornis

 
 

 Rhinoceros sondaicus

 
 
 

 Dicerorhinus sumatrensis

 
 
 
 

 Ceratotherium simum

 
 

 Diceros bicornis

 
 
 
 
 
 

Prehistoric members
Live reconstruction of chalicothere Anisodon grande (formerly Chalicotherium grande)

There are many perissodactyl fossils of multivariant form. The major lines of development include the following groups:

  • The Brontotherioidea were among the earliest known large mammals, consisting of the families of Brontotheriidae (synonym Titanotheriidae), the most well known representative being Megacerops and the more basal family Lambdotheriidae. They were generally characterized in their late phase by a bony horn at the transition from the nose to the frontal bone and flat molars suitable for chewing soft plant food. The Brontotheroidea, which were almost exclusively confined to North America and Asia, died out at the beginning of the Upper Eocene
  • The Equoidea (equines) also developed in the Eocene. The Palaeotheriidae are known mainly from Europe; their most famous member is Eohippus, which became extinct in the Oligocene. In contrast, the horse family (Equidae) flourished and spread. Over time this group saw a reduction in toe number, extension of the limbs, and the progressive adjustment of the teeth for eating hard grasses.
  • The Chalicotherioidea represented another characteristic group, consisting of the families Chalicotheriidae and Lophiodontidae. The Chalicotheriidae developed claws instead of hooves and considerable extension of the forelegs. The best-known genera include Chalicotherium and Moropus. The Chalicotherioidea died out in the Pleistocene.
  • The Rhinocerotoidea (rhino relatives) included a large variety of forms from the Eocene up to the Oligocene, including dog-size leaf feeders, semiaquatic animals, and also huge long-necked animals. Only a few had horns on the nose. The Amynodontidae were hippo-like, aquatic animals. The Hyracodontidae developed long limbs and long necks that were most pronounced in the Paraceratherium (formerly known as Baluchitherium or Indricotherium), the second largest known land mammal ever to have lived (after Palaeoloxodon namadicus[14]). The rhinos (Rhinocerotidae) emerged in the Middle Eocene; five species survive to the present day.
  • The Tapiroidea reached their greatest diversity in the Eocene, when more than one class lived in Eurasia and North America. They retained a primitive physique and are noted for the development of a trunk. The extinct families within this group include the Helaletidae.
  • Several mammal groups traditionally classified as condylarths, long-understood to be a wastebasket taxon, such as hyopsodontids and phenacodontids, are now understood to be part of the odd-toed ungulate assemblage. Phenacodontids seem to be stem-perissodactyls, while hyopsodontids are closely related to horses and brontotheres, despite their more primitive overall appearance.
  • Desmostylia[15] and Anthracobunidae have traditionally been placed among the afrotheres, but they may actually represent stem-perissodactyls. They are an early lineage of mammals that took to the water, spreading across semi-aquatic to fully marine niches in the Tethys Ocean and the northern Pacific. However, later studies have shown that, while anthracobunids are definite perissodactyls, desmostylians have enough mixed characters to suggest that a position among the Afrotheria is not out of the question.[16]
  • Order Perissodactyla [17]

Higher classification of perissodactyls
Internal classification of Perissodactyla[23]
 Perissodactyla 
 Tapiromorpha 
 

 Isectolophidae (†)

 
 
 Ancylopoda 
 

 Lophiodontidae (†)

 
 

 Chalicotheriidae (†)

 
 
 Ceratomorpha 
 Tapiroidea 
 

 Helaletidae (†)

 
 

 Tapiridae

 
 
 Rhinocerotoidea 
 

 Amynodontidae (†)

 
 
 

 Hyracodontidae (†)

 
 

 Rhinocerotidae

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Hippomorpha 
 Equoidea 
 

 Palaeotheriidae (†)

 
 

 Equidae

 
 
 Brontotherioidea 
 

 Lambdotheriidae (†)

 
 

 Brontotheriidae (†)

 
 
 
 

Relationships within the large group of odd-toed ungulates are not fully understood. Initially, after the establishment of "Perissodactyla" by Richard Owen in 1848, the present-day representatives were considered equal in rank. In the first half of the 20th century, a more systematic differentiation of odd-toed ungulates began, based on a consideration of fossil forms, and they were placed in two major suborders: Hippomorpha and Ceratomorpha. The Hippomorpha comprises today's horses and their extinct members (Equoidea); the Ceratomorpha consist of tapirs and rhinos plus their extinct members (Tapiroidea and Rhinocerotoidea).[24] The names Hippomorpha and Ceratomorpha were introduced in 1937 by Horace Elmer Wood, in response to criticism of the name "Solidungula" that he proposed three years previously. It had been based on the grouping of horses and Tridactyla and on the rhinoceros/tapir complex.[25][26] The extinct brontotheriidae were also classified under Hippomorpha and therefore possess a close relationship to horses. Some researchers accept this assignment because of similar dental features, but there is also the view that a very basal position within the odd-toed ungulates places them rather in the group of Titanotheriomorpha.[23][27]

Originally, the Chalicotheriidae were seen as members of Hippomorpha, and presented as such in 1941. William Berryman Scott thought that, as claw-bearing perissodactyls, they belong in the new suborder Ancylopoda (where Ceratomorpha and Hippomorpha as odd-toed ungulates were combined in the group of Chelopoda).[28] The term Ancylopoda, coined by Edward Drinker Cope in 1889, had been established for chalicotheres. However, further morphological studies from the 1960s showed a middle position of Ancylopoda between Hippomorpha and Ceratomorpha. Leonard Burton Radinsky saw all three major groups of odd-toed ungulates as peers, based on the extremely long and independent phylogenetic development of the three lines.[29] In the 1980s, Jeremy J. Hooker saw a general similarity of Ancylopoda and Ceratomorpha based on dentition, especially in the earliest members, leading to the unification in 1984 of the two submissions in the interim order, Tapiromorpha. At the same time he expanded the Ancylopoda to include the Lophiodontidae. The name "Tapiromorpha" goes back to Ernst Haeckel, who coined it in 1873, but it was long considered synonymous to Ceratomorpha because Wood had not considered it in 1937 when Ceratomorpha were named, since the term had been used quite differently in the past.[30] Also in 1984, Robert M. Schoch used the conceptually similar term Moropomorpha, which today applies synonymously to Tapiromorpha.[31] Included within the Tapiromorpha are the now extinct Isectolophidae, a sister group of the Ancylopoda-Ceratomorpha group and thus the most primitive members of this relationship complex.[27][32]

Evolutionary history

Origins

The evolutionary development of Perissodactyla is well documented in the fossil record. Numerous finds are evidence of the adaptive radiation of this group, which was once much more varied and widely dispersed. Radinskya from the late Paleocene of East Asia is often considered to be one of the oldest close relatives of the ungulates.[33] Its 8 cm skull must have belonged to a very small and primitive animal with a π-shaped crown pattern on the enamel of its rear molars similar to that of perissodactyls and their relatives, especially the rhinos.[34] Finds of Cambaytherium and Kalitherium in the Cambay shale of western India indicate an origin in Asia dating to the Lower Eocene roughly 54.5 million years ago.[35][36] Their teeth also show similarities to Radinskya as well as to the Tethytheria clade.[37][38] The saddle-shaped configuration of the navicular joints and the mesaxonic construction of the front and hind feet also indicates a close relationship to Tethytheria. However, this construction deviates from that of Cambaytherium, indicating that it is actually a member of a sister group. Ancestors of Perissodactyla may have arrived via an island bridge from the Afro-Arab landmass onto the Indian subcontinent as it drifted north towards Asia.[39]

The alignment of hyopsodontids and phenacodontids to Perissodactyla in general suggests an older Laurasian origin and distribution for the clade, dispersed across the northern continents already in the early Paleocene. These forms already show a fairly well-developed molar morphology, with no intermediary forms as evidence of the course of its development.[16] The close relationship between meridiungulate mammals and perissoodactyls in particular is of interest since the latter appear in South America soon after the K–T event, implying rapid ecological radiation and dispersal after the mass extinction.[40]

Phylogeny
Eohippus, an early relative of the horse, is one of the oldest-known perissodactyls

The Perissodactyla appear relatively abruptly at the beginning of the Lower Paleocene before about 63 million years ago, both in North America and Asia, in the form of phenacodontids and hyopsodontids. The oldest finds from an extant group originate among other sources from Sifrhippus, an ancestor of the horses from the Willswood lineup in northwestern Wyoming.[41][42] The distant ancestors of tapirs appeared not too long after that in the Ghazij lineup in Balochistan, such as Ganderalophus, as well as Litolophus from the Chalicotheriidae line, or Eotitanops from the group of brontotheriidae.[43][44] Initially, the members of the different lineages looked quite similar with an arched back and generally four toes on the front and three on the hind feet. Eohippus, which is considered a member of the horse family, outwardly resembled Hyrachyus, the first representative of the rhino and tapir line.[45] All were small compared to later forms and lived as fruit and foliage eaters in forests. The first of the megafauna to emerge were the brontotheres, in the Middle and Upper Eocene. Megacerops, known from North America, reached a withers height of 2.5 m (8 ft 2 in) and could have weighed just over 3 metric tons (3.3 short tons). The decline of brontotheres at the end of the Eocene is associated with competition arising from the advent of more successful herbivores.[17][46]

More successful lines of odd-toed ungulates emerged at the end of the Eocene when dense jungles gave way to steppe, such as the chalicotheriid rhinos, and their immediate relatives; their development also began with very small forms. Paraceratherium, one of the largest mammals ever to walk the earth, evolved during this era.[47][48] They weighed up to 20 metric tons (22 short tons) and lived throughout the Oligocene in Eurasia. About 20 million years ago at the onset of the Miocene the perissodactyls first reached Africa when it became connected to Eurasia because of the closing of the Tethys Ocean. For the same reason, however, new animals such as the mammoths also entered the ancient settlement areas of odd-toed ungulates, creating competition that led to the extinction of some of their lines. The rise of ruminants, which occupied similar ecological niches and had a much more efficient digestive system, is also associated with the decline in diversity of odd-toed ungulates. A significant cause for the decline of perissodactyls was climate change during the Miocene, leading to a cooler and drier climate accompanied by the spread of open landscapes. However, some lines flourished, such as the horses and rhinos; anatomical adaptations made it possible for them to consume tougher grass food. This led to open land forms that dominated the newly created landscapes. With the emergence of the Isthmus of Panama in the Pliocene, perissodactyls and other megafauna were given access to one of their last habitable continents: South America.[49][50] However, many perissodactyls became extinct at the end of the ice ages, including American horses and the Elasmotherium. Whether over-hunting by humans (overkill hypothesis), climatic change, or a combination of both factors was responsible for the extinction of ice age mega-fauna, remains controversial.[17]

Research history
Richard Owen, 1856

In 1758, in his seminal work Systema Naturae, Linnaeus (1707–1778) classified horses (Equus) together with hippos (Hippopotamus). At that time, this category also included the tapirs (Tapirus), more precisely the lowland or South American tapir (Tapirus terrestus), the only tapir then known in Europe. Linnaeus classified this tapir as Hippopotamus terrestris and put both genera in the group of the Belluae ("beasts"). He combined the rhinos with the Glires, a group now consisting of the lagomorphs and rodents. Mathurin Jacques Brisson (1723–1806) first separated the tapirs and hippos in 1762 with the introduction of the concept le tapir. He also separated the rhinos from the rodents, but did not combine the three families now known as the odd-toed ungulates. In the transition to the 19th century, the individual perissodactyl genera were associated with various other groups, such as the proboscidean and even-toed ungulates. In 1795, Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire (1772–1844) and Georges Cuvier (1769–1832) introduced the term "pachyderm" (Pachydermata), including in it not only the rhinos and elephants, but also the hippos, pigs, peccaries, tapirs and hyrax .[24][27][51][52] The horses were still generally regarded as a group separate from other mammals and were often classified under the name Solidungula or Solipèdes, meaning "one-hoof animal".[53][54]

In 1861, Henri Marie Ducrotay de Blainville (1777–1850) classified ungulates by the structure of their feet, differentiating those with an even number of toes from those with an odd number. He moved the horses as solidungulate over to the tapirs and rhinos as multungulate animals and referred to all of them together as onguligrades à doigts impairs, coming close to the concept of the odd-toed ungulate as a systematic unit. Richard Owen (1804–1892) quoted Blainville in his study on fossil mammals of the Isle of Wight and introduced the name Perissodactyla.[24][27]

In 1884, Othniel Charles Marsh (1831–1899) came up with the concept Mesaxonia, which he used for what are today called the odd-toed ungulates, including their extinct relatives, but explicitly excluding the hyrax. Mesaxonia is now considered a synonym of Perissodactyla, but it was sometimes also used for the true odd-toed ungulates as a subcategory (rhinos, horses, tapirs), while Perissodactyla stood for the entire order, including the hyrax. The assumption that hyraxes were Perissodactyla was held well into the 20th century.[55] Only with the advent of molecular genetic research methods had it been recognized that the hyrax is not closely related to perissodactyls but rather to elephants and manatees.[6][56]

Interactions with humans
The quagga had become extinct by the end of the 19th century.

The domestic horse and the donkey play an important role in human history particularly as transport, work and pack animals. The domestication of both species began several millennia BCE. Due to the motorisation of agriculture and the spread of automobile traffic, such use has declined sharply in Western industrial countries; riding is usually undertaken more as a hobby or sport. In less developed regions of the world, the traditional uses for these animals are, however, still widespread. To a lesser extent, horses and donkeys are also kept for their meat and their milk.

In contrast, the existence in the wild of almost all other odd-toed ungulates species has declined dramatically because of hunting and habitat destruction. The quagga is extinct and Przewalski's horse was once eradicated in the wild.

Present threat levels, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (2012):[57]

gollark: Just do it correctly.
gollark: You probably enabled them wrong.
gollark: Heresy!
gollark: Oh, I wanted to know whether you thought the EmuWiki™ should use DokuWiki or MediaWiki.
gollark: On https://notes.osmarks.tk/ you can do https://notes.osmarks.tk/bees:potatoes and stuff.

References
  1. "The Largest Beasts to Walk the Earth". Phenomena. National Geographic Society. 14 July 2015.
  2. "Dawn horse". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 7 September 2016.
  3. Allen, Jeremiah (March 2010). Namibia. Other Places Travel Guide. ISBN 9780982261965.
  4. Zookeeping: An Introduction to the Science and Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2013. p. 273.
  5. Williams, Jennifer (15 December 2008). "Understand Normal Mare and Foal Behavior". equusmagazine.com. Archived from the original on 13 May 2017. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
  6. Dan Graur; Manolo Gouy; Laurent Duret (1997). "Evolutionary Affinities of the Order Perissodactyla and the Phylogenetic Status of the Superordinal taxa Ungulata and Altungulata Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 7 (2): 195–200. doi:10.1006/mpev.1996.0391. PMID 9126561.
  7. Jingyang Hu; Zhang Yaping; Li Yu (2012). "Summary of Laurasiatheria (Mammalia) Phylogeny". Zoological Research. 33 (6): 65–74. doi:10.3724/sp.j.1141.2012.e05-06e65. PMID 23266984.
  8. Hidenori Nishihara; Masami Hasegawa; Norihiro Okada (2006). "Pegasoferae, an unexpected mammalian clade revealed by tracking ancient retroposon insertions". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 103 (26): 9929–9934. doi:10.1073/pnas.0603797103. PMC 1479866. PMID 16785431.
  9. Frido Welker; Matthew J. Collins; Jessica A. Thomas; Marc Wadsley; Selina Brace; Enrico Cappellini; Samuel T. Turvey; Marcelo Reguero; Javier N. Gelfo; Alejandro Kramarz; Joachim Burger; Thomas Jane Oates; David A. Ashford; Peter D. Ashton; Keri Rowsell; Duncan M. Porter; Benedikt Kessler; Roman Fischer; Carsten Baessmann; Stephanie Kaspar; Jesper V. Olsen; Patrick Kiley; James A. Elliott; Christian D. Kelstrup; Victoria Mullin; Michael Hofreiter; Eske Willerslev; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Ludovic Orlando; Ian Barnes; Ross DE MacPhee (2015). "Ancient protein resolve the evolutionary history of Darwin's South American ungulates". Nature. 522 (7554): 81–84. doi:10.1038/nature14249. PMID 25799987.
  10. Ross MacPhee; Frido Welker; Jessica Thomas; Selina Brace; Enrico Cappellini; Samuel Turvey; Ian Barnes; Marcelo Reguero; Javier Gelfo; Alejandro Kramarz (2014). "Ancient protein sequencing Resolves litoptern and notoungulate superordinal affinities". The History of Life: A View from the Southern Hemisphere: 186.
  11. Christelle Tougard; Thomas Delefosse; Catherine Hänni; Claudine Montgelard (2001). "Phylogenetic Relationships of the Five Extant Rhinoceros species (Rhinocerotidae, Perissodactyla) Based on Mitochondrial Cytochrome b and 12S rRNA gene". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 19 (1): 34–44. doi:10.1006/mpev.2000.0903. PMID 11286489.
  12. Cynthia C. Steiner; Oliver A. Ryder (2011). "Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the Perissodactyla". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 163 (4): 1289–1303. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00752.x.
  13. Mario A. Cozzuol; Camila L. Clozato; Elizete C. Holanda; Flávio HG Rodrigues; Samuel Nienow; Benoit de Thoisy; Rodrigo Redondo; AF Fabrício R. Santos (2013). "A new species of tapir from the Amazon". Journal of Mammalogy. 94 (6): 1331 to 1345. doi:10.1644/12-MAMM-A-169.1.
  14. Larramendi A (2016). "Withers height, body mass and shape of proboscideans". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 61. doi:10.4202/app.00136.2014.
  15. Cooper L. N.; Seiffert E. R.; Clementz M.; Madar S. I.; Bajpai S.; Hussain S. T.; Thewissen J. G. M. (2014). "Anthracobunids from the Middle Eocene of India and Pakistan Are Stem Perissodactyls". PLOS ONE. 9 (10): e109232. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109232. PMC 4189980. PMID 25295875.
  16. Gheerbrant Emmanuel; Filippo Andrea; Schmitt Arnaud (2016). "Convergence of Afrotherian and Laurasiatherian Ungulate-Like Mammals: First Morphological Evidence from the Paleocene of Morocco". PLOS ONE. 11 (7): e0157556. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157556. PMC 4934866. PMID 27384169.
  17. Donald, R. (2009). "Evolutionary Transitions in the Fossil Record of Terrestrial Hoofed Mammals". Evolution: Education and Outreach. 2 (2): 289–302. doi:10.1007/s12052-009-0136-1.
  18. Ravel Anthony; Orliac Maeva (2014). "The inner ear morphology of the 'condylarthran' Hyopsodus lepidus". Historical Biology. 27 (8): 8. doi:10.1080/08912963.2014.915823.
  19. Badiola, A.; Pareda-Suberbiola, X.; Cuesta, M. (2003). "A new species of Pachynolophus (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from Zambrana (Álava, Basque-Cantabrian Region). Phylogenetic analysis of Pachynolophus and first mention in the Late Eocene of the Iberian Peninsula". Geobios. 38 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2003.07.005.
  20. Tsubamoto, T.; Tun, S.T.; et al. (2003). "Reevaluation of some ungulate mammals from the Eocene Pondaung Formation, Myanmar". Paleontological Research. 7 (3): 219–243. doi:10.2517/prpsj.7.219.
  21. Gong, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. (December 2019). "Dietary adaptations and palaeoecology of Lophialetidae (Mammalia, Tapiroidea) from the Eocene of the Erlian Basin, China: combined evidence from mesowear and stable isotope analyses". Palaeontology. 63 (4): 547–564. doi:10.1111/pala.12471.
  22. Cooper, L. N.; Seiffert, E. R.; Clementz, M.; Madar, S. I.; Bajpai, S.; Hussain, S. T.; Thewissen, J. G. M. (8 October 2014). "Anthracobunids from the Middle Eocene of India and Pakistan Are Stem Perissodactyls". PLOS ONE. 9 (10): e109232. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109232. PMC 4189980. PMID 25295875.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  23. Luke T. Holbrook; Joshua Lapergola (2011). "A new genus of perissodactyl (Mammalia) from the Bridgerian of Wyoming, with comments on basal perissodactyl phylogeny". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 31 (4): 895–901. doi:10.1080/02724634.2011.579669.
  24. George Gaylord (1945). "The Principles of Classification and a Classification of Mammals". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History: 252–258.
  25. Horace Elmer Wood (1934). "Revision of the Hyrachyidae". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History: 181–295.
  26. Horace Elmer Wood (1937). "Perissodactyl suborders". Journal of Mammalogy. 18: 106. doi:10.1093/jmammal/18.1.106.
  27. Robert M. Schoch (1989). "A brief historical review of perissodactyl classification". The Evolution of Perissodactyls. Oxford University Press. pp. 13–23.
  28. William Berryman Scott (1941). "Part V: Perissodactyla". The Mammalian Fauna of the White River Oligocene Transactions of the American Philosophical Society New Series. 28 (5): 747–964. doi:10.2307/1005518. JSTOR 1005518.
  29. Leonard B. Radinsky (1964). "Paleomoropus, a new early Eocene chalicothere (Mammalia, Perissodactyla), and a revision of Eocene chalicotheres". American Museum Novitates: 1–28.
  30. JJ Hooker (1984). "A primitive ceratomorph (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Early Tertiary of Europe". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 82 (1–2): 229–244. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1984.tb00545.x.
  31. Robert Milton Schoch (1984). "Two unusual specimens of the Yale Peabody Museum Helaletes in collections, and some comments on the ancestry of the Tapiridae (Perissodactyla, Mammalia)". Peabody Museum, Yale University: 1–20. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  32. Luke T. Holbrook (2001). "Comparative osteology of early Tertiary tapiromorphs (Mammalia, Perissodactyla)". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 132: 1–54. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2001.tb02270.x.
  33. Malcolm C. McKenna; Chow Minna; Suyin Ting; Luo Zhexi (1989). "Radinskya yupingae, a perissodactyl-like mammal from the Late Palaeocene of China". The Evolution of Perissodactyls. Oxford University Press. pp. 24–36.
  34. Kenneth D. Rose (2006). The Beginning of the Age of Mammals. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 242–267.
  35. Sunil Bajpai; Vivesh Kapur; Debasis P. Das; BN Tiwari; N. Saravanan; Ritu Sharma (2005). "Early Eocene Land Mammals from Vastan Lignite Mine, District Surat (Gujarat), western India". Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India: 101–113.
  36. Sunil Bajpai; Vivesh Kapur; JGM Thewissen; Debasis P. Das; BN Tiwari (2006). "New Early Eocene cambaythere (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Vastan Lignite Mine (Gujarat, India) and on evaluation of cambaythere relationships". Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India: 101–110.
  37. Kenneth D. Rose; Thierry Smith; Rajendra S. Rana; Ashok Sahni; H. Singh; A. Pieter Missiaen (2006). "Early Eocene (Ypresian) Continental vertebrate assemblage from India, with description of a new anthracobunid (Mammalia, tethytheria )". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 26: 219–225. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[219:eeycva]2.0.co;2.
  38. Kishor Kumar (2005). "Comments on 'Early Eocene Land Mammals from Vastan Lignite Mine, District Surat (Gujarat), western India' by Bajpai". Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India: 101–113, 2005.
  39. Kenneth D. Rose; Luke T. Holbrook; Rajendra S. Rana; Kishor Kumar; Katrina E. Jones; Heather E. Ahrens; Pieter Missiaen; Ashok Sahni; Thierry Smith (2014). "Early Eocene fossils suggest that the mammalian order Perissodactyla originated in India". Nature Communications. 5: 5570. doi:10.1038/ncomms6570. PMID 25410701.
  40. Halliday Thomas John Dixon; Upchurch Paul; Goswami Anjali (1833). "Eutherians experienced elevated evolutionary rates in the immediate aftermath of the Cretaceous–Palaeogene mass extinction". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 283 (1833): 20153026. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.3026. PMC 4936024. PMID 27358361.
  41. Ross Secord; Jonathan I. Bloch; Stephen GB Chester; Doug M. Boyer; Aaron R. Wood; Scott L. Wing; Mary J. Kraus; Francesca A. McInerney; John Krigbaum (2012). "Evolution of the Earliest Horses Driven by Climate Change in the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum". Science. 335 (6071): 959–962. doi:10.1126/science.1213859. PMID 22363006.
  42. David J. Froehlich (2002). "The systematics and taxonomy of the early Eocene equids (Perissodactyla)". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 134 (2): 141–256. doi:10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00005.x.
  43. Pieter Missiaen; Philip D. Gingerich (2012). "New Early Eocene tapiromorph perissodactyls from the Ghazij formation of Pakistan, with implications for mammalian biochronology in Asia". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 57: 21–34. doi:10.4202/app.2010.0093. hdl:1854/LU-3178691.
  44. Pieter Missiaen; Gregg F. Gunnell; Philip D. Gingerich (2011). "New brontotheriidae (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from the Early and Middle Eocene of Pakistan with implications for mammalian paleobiogeography". Journal of Paleontology. 85 (4): 665–677. doi:10.1666/10-087.1.
  45. Hlawatsch, Kerstin; Erfurt, Jörg (2007). "Zahnmorphologie und stratigraphische Verbreitung von Hyrachyus minimus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) in den eozänen Geiseltalschichten" [Tooth morphology and stratigraphic distribution of Hyrachyus minimus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) in the Eocene Geiseltal layers]. Hallesches Jahrbuch für Geowissenschaften. Suppl. 23: 161–173.
  46. Christine Janis (2008). "An evolutionary history of browsing and grazing ungulates". In Iain J. Gordon; Herbert H. T. Prins (eds.). The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing. Ecological Studies. 195. Springer. pp. 21–45. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72422-3_2. ISBN 978-3-540-72421-6.
  47. Benton, Michael J. (1997). Vertebrate Palaeontology. London: Chapman & Hall. p. 343. ISBN 0-412-73810-4.
  48. Mikael Fortelius; John Kappelmann (1993). "The Largest land mammal ever imagined" (PDF). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 108: 85–101. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1993.tb02560.x.
  49. Matthew Colbert (2007). "New Fossil Discoveries and the History of Tapirus". Tapir Conservation: 12–14.
  50. Ludovic Orlando; Jessica L. Metcalf; Maria T. Alberdi; Miguel Telles Antunes-Dominique Bonjean; Marcel Otte; Fabiana Martin; et al. (2009). "Revising the recent evolutionary history of equids using ancient DNA". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 106 (51): 21754–21759. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903672106. PMC 2799835. PMID 20007379.
  51. Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire; Georges Cuvier (1795). "Memoire sur une nouvelle division of Mammifères, et sur les principes qui doivent servir de base dans cette sorte de travail". Magasin Encyclopédique: 164–190.
  52. Georges Cuvier (1817). "Le Règne Animal distribue d'après son organisation pour servir de base à l'histoire naturelle des animaux". Introduction à l'Anatomie Comparée. 1: 1–540.
  53. Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1779). Handbook of Natural History. pp. 168–448.
  54. Georges Cuvier (1798). "Tableau Elementaire de l'histoire naturelle des animaux": 1–710. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  55. Donald R. Prothero; Robert M. Schoch (1989). "Classification of the Perissodactyla". The Evolution of Perissodactyls. Oxford University Press. pp. 530–537.
  56. Rodolphe Tabuce; Laurent Marivaux; Mohammed Adaci; Mustapha Bensalah; Jean-Louis Hartenberger; Mohammed Mahboubi; Fateh Mebrouk; Paul Tafforeau; Jean-Jacques Jaeger (2007). "Early Tertiary mammals from North Africa reinforce the molecular Afrotheria clade". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 274 (1614): 1159–1166. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0229. PMC 2189562. PMID 17329227.
  57. International Union for Conservation of Nature. "IUCN redlist".

Further reading
  • Martin S. Fischer: Mesaxonia (Perissodactyla) Perissodactyla. In: Wilfried Westheide, Reinhard Rieger (eds.): Systematic Zoology. Part 2: Vortex or craniotes. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg and Berlin 2004, pp 646–655, ISBN 3-8274-0307-3.
  • Ronald M. Nowak: Walker's Mammals of the World. 6th edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 1999, ISBN 0-8018-5789-9.
  • Thomas S. Kemp:. The Origin & Evolution of Mammals Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005. ISBN 0-19-850761-5.
  • AH Müller: Textbook of Paleozoology, Volume III: vertebrates, Part 3: Mammalia. 2nd edition. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena and Stuttgart 1989. ISBN 3-334-00223-3.
  • Don E. Wilson, DeeAnn M. Reeder (eds.): Mammal Species of the World. 3rd edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 2005 ISBN 0-8018-8221-4.
  • Ronald M. Nowak (1999), Walker's Mammals of the World (6th ed.), Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, ISBN 978-0-8018-5789-8, LCCN 98023686
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.