Liturgiam authenticam

Liturgiam authenticam (De usu linguarum popularium in libris liturgiae Romanae edendis) is an instruction of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, dated 28 March 2001.

Part of a series on the
Canon law of the
Catholic Church
 Catholicism portal
Part of a series on
Translation
Types
Theory
Technologies
Localization
Institutional
  • Associations
  • Awards
  • Organizations
  • Schools
Related topics

This instruction included the requirement that, in translations of the liturgical texts from the official Latin originals, or Sacred Scripture from the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek "the original text, insofar as possible, must be translated integrally and in the most exact manner, without omissions or additions in terms of their content, and without paraphrases or glosses. Any adaptation to the characteristics or the nature of the various vernacular languages is to be sober and discreet." (n. 20)

Use of the Nova Vulgata
See also: Nova Vulgata

Liturgiam authenticam established the Nova Vulgata as "the point of reference as regards the delineation of the canonical text." Concerning the translation of liturgical texts, the instruction states: "Furthermore, in the preparation of these translations for liturgical use, the Nova Vulgata Editio, promulgated by the Apostolic See, is normally to be consulted as an auxiliary tool, in a manner described elsewhere in this Instruction, in order to maintain the tradition of interpretation that is proper to the Latin Liturgy. [...] [I]t is advantageous to be guided by the Nova Vulgata wherever there is a need to choose, from among various possibilities [of translation], that one which is most suited for expressing the manner in which a text has traditionally been read and received within the Latin liturgical tradition"[1] However, the instruction precises (n. 24) that translations should not be made from the Nova Vulgata, but "must be made directly from the original texts, namely the Latin, as regards the texts of ecclesiastical composition, or the Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek, as the case may be, as regards the texts of Sacred Scripture[.]" Therefore, the instruction does not recommend a translation of the Bible or of the liturgy based upon the Latin Nova Vulgata; the Nova Vulgata must simply being used as an "auxiliary tool" (n. 24).[2]

Reactions

The Catholic Biblical Association reacted negatively to the publication of the instruction.[3] In reaction to this, Cardinal Estévez wrote in Notitiae to answer criticisms and misunderstandings concerning the instruction.[2]

gollark: That is indeed a word which you can put in quotes.
gollark: The trouble is that even an initially good measurement of how well you're likely to do a specific job is probably going to be distorted more and more the longer it's used as people try to optimize for it instead of actually being good at the job.
gollark: Apparently IQ correlates decently with some important things.
gollark: Ideally hiring would be entirely merit-based, but we end up with credentialism instead.
gollark: I wonder how many edit wars it'll end up experiencing.

See also

References
  1. "Liturgiam authenticam". vatican.va. Retrieved 2015-06-04.
  2. Estévez, Jorge A. Medina (Nov–Dec 2001). "Translations and the Consultation of the Nova Vulgata of the Latin Church". www.bible-researcher.com. Notitiae, vol. 37. Retrieved 2019-09-24 – via bible-researcher.com.
  3. "The Catholic Biblical Association's reaction to Liturgiam Authenticam". www.bible-researcher.com. Retrieved 2019-09-24.

Further readings
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.