Right of Option
In canon law, Right of Option is a way of obtaining a benefice or a title, by the choice of the new titulary himself.
Part of a series on the |
Canon law of the Catholic Church |
---|
Jus antiquum (c. 33-1140)
Jus novum (c. 1140-1563) Jus novissimum (c. 1563-1918) Jus codicis (1918-present) Other |
Sacraments
Sacred places
Sacred times |
|
Supreme authority, particular churches, and canonical structures Supreme authority of the Church
Supra-diocesan/eparchal structures
|
|
Temporal goods (property) |
Canonical documents |
Procedural law Pars statica (tribunals & ministers/parties)
Pars dynamica (trial procedure)
Election of the Roman Pontiff |
Legal practice and scholarship
Academic degrees Journals and Professional Societies Faculties of canon law
Canonists |
|
History
Many chapters enjoyed this right formerly and it is still the privilege of some: the canon, who has held his office for the longest time may, in conformity with the statutory regulation, resign the prebend he enjoys to accept another that has become vacant.
A second right of option existed in France before 1789: by virtue of a custom a prebendary, who was appointed to and had entered into possession of a benefice incompatible with one he already held, was entitled to select whichever of the two he preferred, when, according to the common law, he had already lost the incompatible benefice which he had previously held. The right of option still exists with regard to cardinalitial titles.
Derivations in public law
In this way the canon law first established an ‘’incompatibility’’, giving life to the prohibition of the simultaneous possession of two ecclesiastical benefices. Since this sanction forward, also public law enshrined the same solution[1] in order to prevent the conflict of interests (for example between electoral mandates or different public offices) in a way less drastic than an ineligibility[2] or a disfranchisement.
References
- Italian Parliament, Chamber of deputies, IV legislature, Assembly, Official records, 31 jan. 1968, p. 43308.
- Temistocle Martines said the disqualification to be the effect, while the incompatibility is a cause, which has different effects depending on the choice of the legislature: Buonomo, Giampiero (2008). "Incompatibilità delle cariche politiche tra Stato, Regioni e diritto comparato". Diritto&Giustizia edizione online. – via Questia (subscription required)
- Attribution
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Right of Option". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.