Cyborg

A cyborg (/ˈsbɔːrɡ/), a portmanteau of "cybernetic organism", is a being with both organic and biomechatronic body parts. The term was coined in 1960 by Manfred Clynes and Nathan S. Kline.[1]

The term cyborg is not the same thing as bionic, biorobot or android; it applies to an organism that has restored function or enhanced abilities due to the integration of some artificial component or technology that relies on some sort of feedback.[2] While cyborgs are commonly thought of as mammals, including humans, they might also conceivably be any kind of organism.

D. S. Halacy's Cyborg: Evolution of the Superman in 1965 featured an introduction which spoke of a "new frontier" that was "not merely space, but more profoundly the relationship between 'inner space' to 'outer space' – a bridge...between mind and matter."[3]

In science fiction, the most recognizable portrayal of a cyborg is a human being with visibly mechanical parts, such as the superhero Cyborg from DC Comics or the Borg from Star Trek. But cyborgs may also be portrayed as looking more like robots or more like ordinary humans. Cyborgs may appear as humanoid robots, such as Robotman from DC's Doom Patrol or the Cybermen from Doctor Who, or they may appear as non-humanoid robots, such as the Daleks in Doctor Who or some of the Motorball players in Battle Angel Alita. More human appearing cyborgs may cover up their mechanical parts with armor or clothing, such as Darth Vader from Star Wars or Misty Knight from Marvel Comics. Cyborgs may even have mechanical parts or bodies that appear human. The Six Million Dollar Man and The Bionic Woman had bionic parts that looked like the body parts they replaced. Motoko Kusanagi from Ghost in the Shell is a full-body cyborg whose body looks human. In the examples mentioned, as well as many more, it is common for cyborgs to have physical or mental abilities beyond what humans are capable of. They may have super strength, enhanced senses, computer-assisted brains, or built-in weaponry.

Overview

According to some definitions of the term, the physical attachments humanity has with even the most basic technologies have already made them cyborgs.[4] In a typical example, a human with an artificial cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator would be considered a cyborg, since these devices measure voltage potentials in the body, perform signal processing, and can deliver electrical stimuli, using this synthetic feedback mechanism to keep that person alive. Implants, especially cochlear implants, that combine mechanical modification with any kind of feedback response are also cyborg enhancements. Some theorists cite such modifications as contact lenses, hearing aids, smart phone or intraocular lenses as examples of fitting humans with technology to enhance their biological capabilities. As cyborgs currently are on the rise some theorists argue there is a need to develop new definitions of aging and for instance a bio-techno-social definition of aging has been suggested.[5]

The term is also used to address human-technology mixtures in the abstract. This includes not only commonly used pieces of technology such as phones, computers, the Internet, etc. but also artifacts that may not popularly be considered technology; for example, pen and paper, and speech and language. When augmented with these technologies and connected in communication with people in other times and places, a person becomes capable of much more than they were before. An example is a computer, which gains power by using Internet protocols to connect with other computers. Another example, which is becoming more and more relevant is a bot-assisted human or human-assisted-bot, used to target social media with likes and shares.[6] Cybernetic technologies include highways, pipes, electrical wiring, buildings, electrical plants, libraries, and other infrastructure that we hardly notice, but which are critical parts of the cybernetics that we work within.

Bruce Sterling in his universe of Shaper/Mechanist suggested an idea of alternative cyborg called Lobster, which is made not by using internal implants, but by using an external shell (e.g. a Powered Exoskeleton).[7] Unlike human cyborgs that appear human externally while being synthetic internally (e.g. the Bishop type in the Alien franchise), Lobster looks inhuman externally but contains a human internally (e.g. Elysium, RoboCop). The computer game Deus Ex: Invisible War prominently featured cyborgs called Omar, where "Omar" is a Russian translation of the word "Lobster" (since the Omar are of Russian origin in the game).

Origins

The concept of a man-machine mixture was widespread in science fiction before World War II. As early as 1843, Edgar Allan Poe described a man with extensive prostheses in the short story "The Man That Was Used Up". In 1911, Jean de La Hire introduced the Nyctalope, a science fiction hero who was perhaps the first literary cyborg, in Le Mystère des XV (later translated as The Nyctalope on Mars).[8][9][10] Edmond Hamilton presented space explorers with a mixture of organic and machine parts in his novel The Comet Doom in 1928. He later featured the talking, living brain of an old scientist, Simon Wright, floating around in a transparent case, in all the adventures of his famous hero, Captain Future. He uses the term explicitly in the 1962 short story, "After a Judgment Day", to describe the "mechanical analogs" called "Charlies", explaining that "[c]yborgs, they had been called from the first one in the 1960s...cybernetic organisms." In the short story "No Woman Born" in 1944, C. L. Moore wrote of Deirdre, a dancer, whose body was burned completely and whose brain was placed in a faceless but beautiful and supple mechanical body.

The term was coined by Manfred E. Clynes and Nathan S. Kline in 1960 to refer to their conception of an enhanced human being who could survive in extraterrestrial environments:

For the exogenously extended organizational complex functioning as an integrated homeostatic system unconsciously, we propose the term 'Cyborg'. – Manfred E. Clynes and Nathan S. Kline[11]

Their concept was the outcome of thinking about the need for an intimate relationship between human and machine as the new frontier of space exploration was beginning to open up. A designer of physiological instrumentation and electronic data-processing systems, Clynes was the chief research scientist in the Dynamic Simulation Laboratory at Rockland State Hospital in New York.

The term first appears in print five months earlier when The New York Times reported on the Psychophysiological Aspects of Space Flight Symposium where Clynes and Kline first presented their paper.

A cyborg is essentially a man-machine system in which the control mechanisms of the human portion are modified externally by drugs or regulatory devices so that the being can live in an environment different from the normal one.[12]

A book titled Cyborg: Digital Destiny and Human Possibility in the Age of the Wearable Computer was published by Doubleday in 2001.[13] Some of the ideas in the book were incorporated into the 35 mm motion picture film Cyberman.

Cyborg tissues in engineering

Cyborg tissues structured with carbon nanotubes and plant or fungal cells have been used in artificial tissue engineering to produce new materials for mechanical and electrical uses. The work was presented by Di Giacomo and Maresca at MRS 2013 Spring conference on Apr, 3rd, talk number SS4.04.[14] The cyborg obtained is inexpensive, light and has unique mechanical properties. It can also be shaped in the desired forms. Cells combined with MWCNTs co-precipitated as a specific aggregate of cells and nanotubes that formed a viscous material. Likewise, dried cells still acted as a stable matrix for the MWCNT network. When observed by optical microscopy the material resembled an artificial "tissue" composed of highly packed cells. The effect of cell drying is manifested by their "ghost cell" appearance. A rather specific physical interaction between MWCNTs and cells was observed by electron microscopy suggesting that the cell wall (the most outer part of fungal and plant cells) may play a major active role in establishing a CNTs network and its stabilization. This novel material can be used in a wide range of electronic applications from heating to sensing and has the potential to open important new avenues to be exploited in electromagnetic shielding for radio frequency electronics and aerospace technology. In particular, using Candida albicans cells cyborg tissue materials with temperature sensing properties have been reported.[15]

Actual cyborgization attempts

Cyborg Neil Harbisson with his antenna implant

In current prosthetic applications, the C-Leg system developed by Otto Bock HealthCare is used to replace a human leg that has been amputated because of injury or illness. The use of sensors in the artificial C-Leg aids in walking significantly by attempting to replicate the user's natural gait, as it would be prior to amputation.[16] Prostheses like the C-Leg and the more advanced iLimb are considered by some to be the first real steps towards the next generation of real-world cyborg applications. Additionally cochlear implants and magnetic implants which provide people with a sense that they would not otherwise have had can additionally be thought of as creating cyborgs.

In vision science, direct brain implants have been used to treat non-congenital (acquired) blindness. One of the first scientists to come up with a working brain interface to restore sight was a private researcher William Dobelle. Dobelle's first prototype was implanted into "Jerry", a man blinded in adulthood, in 1978. A single-array BCI containing 68 electrodes was implanted onto Jerry's visual cortex and succeeded in producing phosphenes, the sensation of seeing light. The system included cameras mounted on glasses to send signals to the implant. Initially, the implant allowed Jerry to see shades of grey in a limited field of vision at a low frame-rate. This also required him to be hooked up to a two-ton mainframe, but shrinking electronics and faster computers made his artificial eye more portable and now enable him to perform simple tasks unassisted.[17]

In 1997, Philip Kennedy, a scientist and physician, created the world's first human cyborg from Johnny Ray, a Vietnam veteran who suffered a stroke. Ray's body, as doctors called it, was "locked in". Ray wanted his old life back so he agreed to Kennedy's experiment. Kennedy embedded an implant he designed (and named "neurotrophic electrode") near the part of Ray's brain so that Ray would be able to have some movement back in his body. The surgery went successfully, but in 2002, Johnny Ray died.[18]

In 2002, Canadian Jens Naumann, also blinded in adulthood, became the first in a series of 16 paying patients to receive Dobelle's second generation implant, marking one of the earliest commercial uses of BCIs. The second-generation device used a more sophisticated implant enabling better mapping of phosphenes into a coherent vision. Phosphenes are spread out across the visual field in what researchers call the starry-night effect. Immediately after his implant, Naumann was able to use his imperfectly restored vision to drive slowly around the parking area of the research institute.[19]

In contrast to replacement technologies, in 2002, under the heading Project Cyborg, a British scientist, Kevin Warwick, had an array of 100 electrodes fired into his nervous system in order to link his nervous system into the internet to investigate enhancement possibilities. With this in place, Warwick successfully carried out a series of experiments including extending his nervous system over the internet to control a robotic hand, also receiving feedback from the fingertips in order to control the hand's grip. This was a form of extended sensory input. Subsequently, he investigated ultrasonic input in order to remotely detect the distance to objects. Finally, with electrodes also implanted into his wife's nervous system, they conducted the first direct electronic communication experiment between the nervous systems of two humans.[20][21]

Since 2004, British artist Neil Harbisson has had a cyborg antenna implanted in his head that allows him to extend his perception of colors beyond the human visual spectrum through vibrations in his skull.[22] His antenna was included within his 2004 passport photograph which has been claimed to confirm his cyborg status.[23] In 2012 at TEDGlobal,[24] Harbisson explained that he started to feel cyborg when he noticed that the software and his brain had united and given him an extra sense.[24] Neil Harbisson is a co-founder of the Cyborg Foundation (2004)[25] and cofounded the Transpecies Society in 2017, which is an association that empowers the individuals with non-human identities and supports them in their decisions to develop unique senses and new organs.[26] Neil Harbisson is a global advocate for the rights of cyborgs.

Rob Spence, a Toronto-based film-maker, who titles himself a real-life "Eyeborg", severely damaged his right eye in a shooting accident on his grandfather's farm as a child.[27] Many years later, in 2005, he decided to have his ever-deteriorating and now technically blind eye surgically removed,[28] whereafter he wore an eye patch for some time before he later, after having played for some time with the idea of installing a camera instead, contacted professor Steve Mann at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, an expert in wearable computing and cyborg technology.[28]

Under Mann's guidance, Spence, at age 36, created a prototype in the form of the miniature camera which could be fitted inside his prosthetic eye; an invention would come to be named by Time magazine as one of the best inventions of 2009. The bionic eye records everything he sees and contains a 1.5 mm-square, low-resolution video camera, a small round printed circuit board, a wireless video transmitter, which allows him to transmit what he is seeing in real-time to a computer, and a 3-voltage rechargeable Varta microbattery. The eye is not connected to his brain and has not restored his sense of vision. Additionally, Spence has also installed a laser-like LED light in one version of the prototype.[29]

Furthermore, many cyborgs with multifunctional microchips injected into their hand are known to exist. With the chips they are able to swipe cards, open or unlock doors, operate devices such as printers or, with some using a cryptocurrency, buy products, such as drinks, with a wave of the hand.[30][31][32][33][34]

bodyNET

bodyNET is an application of human-electronic interaction currently in development by researchers from Stanford University.[35] The technology is based on stretchable semiconductor materials (Elastronic). According to their article in Nature, the technology is composed of smart devices, screens, and a network of sensors that can be implanted into the body, woven into the skin or worn as clothes. It has been suggested, that this platform can potentially replace the smartphone in the future.[36]

Animal cyborgs

The US-based company Backyard Brains released what they refer to as "The world's first commercially available cyborg" called the RoboRoach. The project started as a University of Michigan biomedical engineering student senior design project in 2010[37] and was launched as an available beta product on 25 February 2011.[38] The RoboRoach was officially released into production via a TED talk at the TED Global conference,[39] and via the crowdsourcing website Kickstarter in 2013,[40] the kit allows students to use microstimulation to momentarily control the movements of a walking cockroach (left and right) using a bluetooth-enabled smartphone as the controller. Other groups have developed cyborg insects, including researchers at North Carolina State University,[41][42] UC Berkeley,[43][44] and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore,[45][46] but the RoboRoach was the first kit available to the general public and was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health as a device to serve as a teaching aid to promote an interest in neuroscience.[39] Several animal welfare organizations including the RSPCA[47] and PETA[48] have expressed concerns about the ethics and welfare of animals in this project.

In the late 2010s, scientists have created cyborg jellyfish using a microelectronic prosthetic which propels the animal to swim almost three times faster while using just twice the metabolic energy of their unmodified peers. The prosthetics can be removed without harming the jellyfish.[49]

Cyborg proliferation in society

In medicine

In medicine, there are two important and different types of cyborgs: the restorative and the enhanced. Restorative technologies "restore lost function, organs, and limbs".[50] The key aspect of restorative cyborgization is the repair of broken or missing processes to revert to a healthy or average level of function. There is no enhancement to the original faculties and processes that were lost.

On the contrary, the enhanced cyborg "follows a principle, and it is the principle of optimal performance: maximising output (the information or modifications obtained) and minimising input (the energy expended in the process)".[51] Thus, the enhanced cyborg intends to exceed normal processes or even gain new functions that were not originally present.

Although prostheses in general supplement lost or damaged body parts with the integration of a mechanical artifice, bionic implants in medicine allow model organs or body parts to mimic the original function more closely. Michael Chorost wrote a memoir of his experience with cochlear implants, or bionic ear, titled "Rebuilt: How Becoming Part Computer Made Me More Human."[52] Jesse Sullivan became one of the first people to operate a fully robotic limb through a nerve-muscle graft, enabling him a complex range of motions beyond that of previous prosthetics.[53] By 2004, a fully functioning artificial heart was developed.[54] The continued technological development of bionic and nanotechnologies begins to raise the question of enhancement, and of the future possibilities for cyborgs which surpass the original functionality of the biological model. The ethics and desirability of "enhancement prosthetics" have been debated; their proponents include the transhumanist movement, with its belief that new technologies can assist the human race in developing beyond its present, normative limitations such as aging and disease, as well as other, more general incapacities, such as limitations on speed, strength, endurance, and intelligence. Opponents of the concept describe what they believe to be biased which propel the development and acceptance of such technologies; namely, a bias towards functionality and efficiency that may compel assent to a view of human people which de-emphasizes as defining characteristics actual manifestations of humanity and personhood, in favor of definition in terms of upgrades, versions, and utility.[55]

A brain-computer interface, or BCI, provides a direct path of communication from the brain to an external device, effectively creating a cyborg. Research of Invasive BCIs, which utilize electrodes implanted directly into the grey matter of the brain, has focused on restoring damaged eyesight in the blind and providing functionality to paralyzed people, most notably those with severe cases, such as Locked-In syndrome. This technology could enable people who are missing a limb or are in a wheelchair the power to control the devices that aide them through neural signals sent from the brain implants directly to computers or the devices. It is possible that this technology will also eventually be used with healthy people.[56]

Deep brain stimulation is a neurological surgical procedure used for therapeutic purposes. This process has aided in treating patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Tourette syndrome, epilepsy, chronic headaches, and mental disorders. After the patient is unconscious, through anesthesia, brain pacemakers or electrodes, are implanted into the region of the brain where the cause of the disease is present. The region of the brain is then stimulated by bursts of electric current to disrupt the oncoming surge of seizures. Like all invasive procedures, deep brain stimulation may put the patient at a higher risk. However, there have been more improvements in recent years with deep brain stimulation than any available drug treatment.[57]

Retinal implants are another form of cyborgization in medicine. The theory behind retinal stimulation to restore vision to people suffering from retinitis pigmentosa and vision loss due to aging (conditions in which people have an abnormally low number of ganglion cells) is that the retinal implant and electrical stimulation would act as a substitute for the missing ganglion cells (cells which connect the eye to the brain.)

While work to perfect this technology is still being done, there have already been major advances in the use of electronic stimulation of the retina to allow the eye to sense patterns of light. A specialized camera is worn by the subject, such as on the frames of their glasses, which converts the image into a pattern of electrical stimulation. A chip located in the user's eye would then electrically stimulate the retina with this pattern by exciting certain nerve endings which transmit the image to the optic centers of the brain and the image would then appear to the user. If technological advances proceed as planned this technology may be used by thousands of blind people and restore vision to most of them.

A similar process has been created to aid people who have lost their vocal cords. This experimental device would do away with previously used robotic sounding voice simulators. The transmission of sound would start with a surgery to redirect the nerve that controls the voice and sound production to a muscle in the neck, where a nearby sensor would be able to pick up its electrical signals. The signals would then move to a processor which would control the timing and pitch of a voice simulator. That simulator would then vibrate producing a multi-tonal sound which could be shaped into words by the mouth.[58]

An article published in Nature Materials in 2012 reported a research on "cyborg tissues" (engineered human tissues with embedded three-dimensional mesh of nanoscale wires), with possible medical implications.[59]

In 2014, researchers from the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign and Washington University in St. Louis had developed a device that could keep a heart beating endlessly. By using 3D printing and computer modeling these scientist developed an electronic membrane that could successfully replace pacemakers. The device utilizes a "spider-web like network of sensors and electrodes" to monitor and maintain a normal heart-rate with electrical stimuli. Unlike traditional pacemakers that are similar from patient to patient, the elastic heart glove is made custom by using high-resolution imaging technology. The first prototype was created to fit a rabbit's heart, operating the organ in an oxygen and nutrient-rich solution. The stretchable material and circuits of the apparatus were first constructed by Professor John A. Rogers in which the electrodes are arranged in a s-shape design to allow them to expand and bend without breaking. Although the device is only currently used as a research tool to study changes in heart rate, in the future the membrane may serve as a safeguard from heart attacks.[60]

The Artificial Pancreas is a substitute for lack of endogenous insulin production, most notably in Type 1 Diabetes. Currently available systems combine a Continuous glucose monitor with an Insulin pump that can be remote controlled, forming a control loop that automatically adjusts the insulin dosage depending on the current blood glucose level. Examples of commercial systems that implement such a control loop are the MiniMed 670g from Medtronic[61] and the t:slim x2 from Tandem Diabetes Care.[62] Do-it-yourself artificial pancreas technologies also exist, though these are not verified or approved by any regulatory agency.[63] Upcoming next-generation artificial pancreas technologies include automatic glucagon infusion in addition to insulin, to help prevent hypoglycemia and improve efficiency. One example of such a bi-hormonal system is the Beta Bionics iLet.[64]

In the military

Military organizations' research has recently focused on the utilization of cyborg animals for the purposes of a supposed tactical advantage. DARPA has announced its interest in developing "cyborg insects" to transmit data from sensors implanted into the insect during the pupa stage. The insect's motion would be controlled from a Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) and could conceivably survey an environment or detect explosives and gas.[65] Similarly, DARPA is developing a neural implant to remotely control the movement of sharks. The shark's unique senses would then be exploited to provide data feedback in relation to enemy ship movement or underwater explosives.[66]

In 2006, researchers at Cornell University invented[67] a new surgical procedure to implant artificial structures into insects during their metamorphic development.[68][69] The first insect cyborgs, moths with integrated electronics in their thorax, were demonstrated by the same researchers.[70][71] The initial success of the techniques has resulted in increased research and the creation of a program called Hybrid-Insect-MEMS, HI-MEMS. Its goal, according to DARPA's Microsystems Technology Office, is to develop "tightly coupled machine-insect interfaces by placing micro-mechanical systems inside the insects during the early stages of metamorphosis".[72]

The use of neural implants has recently been attempted, with success, on cockroaches. Surgically applied electrodes were put on the insect, which were remotely controlled by a human. The results, although sometimes different, basically showed that the cockroach could be controlled by the impulses it received through the electrodes. DARPA is now funding this research because of its obvious beneficial applications to the military and other areas[73]

In 2009 at the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Micro-electronic mechanical systems (MEMS) conference in Italy, researchers demonstrated the first "wireless" flying-beetle cyborg.[74] Engineers at the University of California at Berkeley have pioneered the design of a "remote-controlled beetle", funded by the DARPA HI-MEMS Program. Filmed evidence of this can be viewed here.[75] This was followed later that year by the demonstration of wireless control of a "lift-assisted" moth-cyborg.[76]

Eventually researchers plan to develop HI-MEMS for dragonflies, bees, rats and pigeons.[77][78] For the HI-MEMS cybernetic bug to be considered a success, it must fly 100 metres (330 ft) from a starting point, guided via computer into a controlled landing within 5 metres (16 ft) of a specific end point. Once landed, the cybernetic bug must remain in place.[77]

In 2020, an article published in Science Robotics by researchers at the University of Washington reported a mechanically steerable wireless camera attached to beetles.[79] Miniature cameras weighing 248 mg were attached to live beetles of the Tenebrionid genera Asbolus and Eleodes. The camera wirelessly streams video to a smartphone via Bluetooth for upto 6 hours and the user could remotely steer the camera to achieve a bug's eye view.[80]

In sports

In 2016 the first cyborg Olympics were celebrated in Zurich Switzerland. Cybathlon 2016 were the first Olympics for cyborgs and the first worldwide and official celebration of cyborg sports. In this event, 16 teams of people with disabilities used technological developments to turn themselves into cyborg athletes. There were six different events and its competitors used and controlled advanced technologies such as powered prosthetic legs and arms, robotic exoskeletons, bikes and motorized wheelchairs.[81]

If on one hand, this was already a remarkable improvement, as it allowed disabled people to compete and showed the several technological enhancements that are already making a difference, on the other hand, it showed that there is still a long way to go. For instance, the exoskeleton race still required its participants to stand up from a chair and sit down, navigate a slalom and other simple activities such as walk over stepping stones and climb up and downstairs. Despite the simplicity of these activities, 8 of the 16 teams that participated in the event drop off before the start.[82]

Nonetheless, one of the main goals of this event and such simple activities is to show how technological enhancements and advanced prosthetic can make a difference in people's lives. The next Cybathlon is expected to occur in 2020

In art

Cyborg artist Moon Ribas, founder of the Cyborg Foundation performing with her seismic sense implant at TED (2016)

The concept of the cyborg is often associated with science fiction. However, many artists have tried to create public awareness of cybernetic organisms; these can range from paintings to installations. Some artists who create such works are Neil Harbisson, Moon Ribas, Patricia Piccinini, Steve Mann, Orlan, H. R. Giger, Lee Bul, Wafaa Bilal, Tim Hawkinson and Stelarc.

Stelarc is a performance artist who has visually probed and acoustically amplified his body. He uses medical instruments, prosthetics, robotics, virtual reality systems, the Internet and biotechnology to explore alternate, intimate and involuntary interfaces with the body. He has made three films of the inside of his body and has performed with a third hand and a virtual arm. Between 1976–1988 he completed 25 body suspension performances with hooks into the skin. For 'Third Ear' he surgically constructed an extra ear within his arm that was internet-enabled, making it a publicly accessible acoustical organ for people in other places.[83] He is presently performing as his avatar from his second life site.[84]

Tim Hawkinson promotes the idea that bodies and machines are coming together as one, where human features are combined with technology to create the Cyborg. Hawkinson's piece Emoter presented how society is now dependent on technology.[85]

Wafaa Bilal is an Iraqi-American performance artist who had a small 10 megapixel digital camera surgically implanted into the back of his head, part of a project entitled 3rd I.[86] For one year, beginning 15 December 2010, an image is captured once per minute 24 hours a day and streamed live to www.3rdi.me and the Mathaf: Arab Museum of Modern Art. The site also displays Bilal's location via GPS. Bilal says that the reason why he put the camera in the back of the head was to make an "allegorical statement about the things we don't see and leave behind."[87] As a professor at NYU, this project has raised privacy issues, and so Bilal has been asked to ensure that his camera does not take photographs in NYU buildings.[87]

Machines are becoming more ubiquitous in the artistic process itself, with computerized drawing pads replacing pen and paper, and drum machines becoming nearly as popular as human drummers. Composers such as Brian Eno have developed and utilized software which can build entire musical scores from a few basic mathematical parameters.[88]

Scott Draves is a generative artist whose work is explicitly described as a "cyborg mind". His Electric Sheep project generates abstract art by combining the work of many computers and people over the internet.[89]

Artists as cyborgs

Artists have explored the term cyborg from a perspective involving imagination. Some work to make an abstract idea of technological and human-bodily union apparent to reality in an art form utilizing varying mediums, from sculptures and drawings to digital renderings. Artists that seek to make cyborg-based fantasies a reality often call themselves cyborg artists, or may consider their artwork "cyborg". How an artist or their work may be considered cyborg will vary depending upon the interpreter's flexibility with the term. Scholars that rely upon a strict, technical description of a cyborg, often going by Norbert Wiener's cybernetic theory and Manfred E. Clynes and Nathan S. Kline's first use of the term, would likely argue that most cyborg artists do not qualify to be considered cyborgs.[90] Scholars considering a more flexible description of cyborgs may argue it incorporates more than cybernetics.[91] Others may speak of defining subcategories, or specialized cyborg types, that qualify different levels of cyborg at which technology influences an individual. This may range from technological instruments being external, temporary, and removable to being fully integrated and permanent.[92] Nonetheless, cyborg artists are artists. Being so, it can be expected for them to incorporate the cyborg idea rather than a strict, technical representation of the term,[93] seeing how their work will sometimes revolve around other purposes outside of cyborgism.[90]

In body modification

As medical technology becomes more advanced, some techniques and innovations are adopted by the body modification community. While not yet cyborgs in the strict definition of Manfred Clynes and Nathan Kline, technological developments like implantable silicon silk electronics,[94] augmented reality[95] and QR codes[96] are bridging the disconnect between technology and the body. Hypothetical technologies such as digital tattoo interfaces[97][98] would blend body modification aesthetics with interactivity and functionality, bringing a transhumanist way of life into present day reality.

In addition, it is quite plausible for anxiety expression to manifest. Individuals may experience pre-implantation feelings of fear and nervousness. To this end, individuals may also embody feelings of uneasiness, particularly in a socialized setting, due to their post-operative, technologically augmented bodies, and mutual unfamiliarity with the mechanical insertion. Anxieties may be linked to notions of otherness or a cyborged identity.[99]

Cyborgs have become a well-known part of science fiction literature and other media. Although many of these characters may be technically androids, they are often referred to as cyborgs.

Well-known examples from film and television include RoboCop, The Terminator, Evangelion, United States Air Force Colonel Steve Austin in both Cyborg and, as acted out by Lee Majors, The Six Million Dollar Man, Replicants from Blade Runner, Daleks and Cybermen from Doctor Who, the Borg from Star Trek, Darth Vader, Lobot, and General Grievous from Star Wars, Inspector Gadget, and Cylons from the 2004 Battlestar Galactica series.

From comicbooks are characters including Deathlok and Victor "Cyborg" Stone; and manga and anime characters including 8 Man (the inspiration for RoboCop), Kamen Rider, Rudol von Stroheim, and Ghost in the Shell's Motoko Kusanagi.

Playable characters such as, Kano, Jax, Cyrax, and Sektor from the Mortal Kombat franchise, as well as Genji, an advanced cyborg ninja, who appears in Overwatch and Heroes of the Storm, are examples of cyborgs in video games. The Deus Ex video game series deals extensively with the near-future rise of cyborgs and their corporate ownership, as does the Syndicate series.

William Gibson's Neuromancer features one of the first female cyborgs, a "Razorgirl" named Molly Millions, who has extensive cybernetic modifications and is one of the most prolific cyberpunk characters in the science fiction canon.[100] The cyborg was also a central part of singer Janelle Monáe's 48-minute video corresponding with the release of her 2018 album "Dirty Computer." This emotion picture intertwined the relationship between human and technology, highlighting the power of the digital on a futuristic, dystopian society. Monáe has previously referred to herself as an android, depicting herself as a mechanical organism often conforming to idealistic standards, thus using the cyborg as a way to detach from these oppressive structures.

In space

Sending humans to space is a dangerous task in which the implementation of various cyborg technologies could be used in the future for risk mitigation.[101] Stephen Hawking, a renowned physicist, stated "Life on Earth is at the ever-increasing risk of being wiped out by a disaster such as sudden global warming, nuclear war... I think the human race has no future if it doesn't go into space." The difficulties associated with space travel could mean it might be centuries before humans ever become a multi-planet species. There are many effect of spaceflight on the human body. One major issue of space exploration is the biological need for oxygen. If this necessity was taken out of the equation, space exploration would be revolutionized. A theory proposed by Manfred E. Clynes and Nathan S. Kline is aimed at tackling this problem. The two scientists theorized that the use of an inverse fuel cell that is "capable of reducing CO2 to its components with the removal of the carbon and re-circulation of the oxygen..."[102] could make breathing unnecessary. Another prominent issue is radiation exposure. Yearly, the average human on earth is exposed to approximately 0.30 rem of radiation, while an astronaut aboard the International Space Station for 90 days is exposed to 9 rem.[103] To tackle the issue, Clynes and Kline theorized a cyborg containing a sensor that would detect radiation levels and a Rose osmotic pump "which would automatically inject protective pharmaceuticals in appropriate doses." Experiments injecting these protective pharmaceuticals into monkeys have shown positive results in increasing radiation resistance.[102]

Although the effects of spaceflight on our body is an important issue, the advancement of propulsion technology is just as important. With our current technology, it would take us about 260 days to get to Mars.[104] A study backed by NASA proposes an interesting way to tackle this issue through deep sleep, or torpor. With this technique, it would "reduce astronauts' metabolic functions with existing medical procedures".[105] So far experiments have only resulted in patients being in torpor state for one week. Advancements to allow for longer states of deep sleep would lower the cost of the trip to mars as a result of reduced astronaut resource consumption.

In cognitive science

Theorists such as Andy Clark suggest that interactions between humans and technology result in the creation of a cyborg system. In this model "cyborg" is defined as a part biological, part mechanical system which results in the augmentation of the biological component and the creation of a more complex whole. Clark argues that this broadened definition is necessary to an understanding of human cognition. He suggests that any tool which is used to offload part of a cognitive process may be considered the mechanical component of a cyborg system. Examples of this human and technology cyborg system can be very low tech and simplistic, such as using a calculator to perform basic mathematical operations or pen and paper to make notes, or as high tech as using a personal computer or phone. According to Clark, these interactions between a person and a form of technology integrate that technology into the cognitive process in a way which is analogous to the way that a technology which would fit the traditional concept a cyborg augmentation becomes integrated with its biological host. Because all humans in some way use technology to augment their cognitive processes, Clark comes to the conclusion that we are "natural-born cyborgs".[106]

Cyborg Foundation

In 2010, the Cyborg Foundation became the world's first international organization dedicated to help humans become cyborgs.[107] The foundation was created by cyborg Neil Harbisson and Moon Ribas as a response to the growing number of letters and emails received from people around the world interested in becoming a cyborg.[108] The foundation's main aims are to extend human senses and abilities by creating and applying cybernetic extensions to the body,[109] to promote the use of cybernetics in cultural events and to defend cyborg rights.[110] In 2010, the foundation, based in Mataró (Barcelona), was the overall winner of the Cre@tic Awards, organized by Tecnocampus Mataró.[111]

In 2012, Spanish film director Rafel Duran Torrent, created a short film about the Cyborg Foundation. In 2013, the film won the Grand Jury Prize at the Sundance Film Festival's Focus Forward Filmmakers Competition and was awarded with US$100,000.[112]

The future scope and regulation of implantable technologies

Given the technical scope of current and future implantable sensory/telemetric devices, these devices will be greatly proliferated, and will have connections to commercial, medical, and governmental networks. For example, in the medical sector, patients will be able to login to their home computer, and thus visit virtual doctor's offices, medical databases, and receive medical prognoses from the comfort of their own home from the data collected through their implanted telemetric devices.[113] However, this online network presents huge security concerns because it has been proven by several U.S. universities that hackers could get onto these networks and shut down peoples' electronic prosthetics.[113] These sorts of technologies are already present in the U.S. workforce as a firm in River Falls, Wisconsin called Three Square Market partnered with a Swedish firm called Biohacks Technology to implant RFID microchips in the hands of its employees (which are about the size of a grain of rice) that allow employees to access offices, computers, and even vending machines. More than 50 of the firms 85 employees were chipped. It was confirmed that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved of these implantations.[114] If these devices are to be proliferated within society, then the question that begs to be answered is what regulatory agency will oversee the operations, monitoring, and security of these devices? According to this case study of Three Square Market, it seems that the FDA is assuming the role in regulating and monitoring these devices.

gollark: Other people can revert it if they think it's invalid.
gollark: It was ENTIRELY legal!!!!
gollark: There's a proposal allowing deleting the RVPs, no?
gollark: next proposal idea:- will actually create rule- defines cool as cool according to me, the right version- defines random as randomish
gollark: osmarks.tk™ autorandom™?

See also

References

  1. Cyborgs and Space, in Astronautics (September 1960), by Manfred E. Clynes and American scientist and researcher Nathan S. Kline.
  2. Carvalko, Joseph (2012). The Techno-human Shell-A Jump in the Evolutionary Gap. Sunbury Press. ISBN 978-1-62006-165-7.
  3. D. S. Halacy, Cyborg: Evolution of the Superman (New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1965), 7.
  4. A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century Archived 14 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine by Donna Haraway
  5. Wejbrandt, A (2014). "Defining aging in cyborgs: A bio-techno-social definition of aging". Journal of Aging Studies. 31: 104–109. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2014.09.003. PMID 25456627.
  6. Chu, Zi; Gianvecchio, Steven; Wang, Haining; Jajodia, Sushil (2012). "Detecting Automation of Twitter Accounts: Are You a Human, Bot, or Cyborg?". IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing. 9 (6): 811–824. doi:10.1109/TDSC.2012.75.
  7. Sterling, Bruce. Schismatrix. Arbor House. 1985.
  8. Zehr, E. Paul (2011). Inventing Iron Man: The Possibility of a Human Machine. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 5. ISBN 978-1421402260.
  9. Vuillermet, Maryse (2004). "Les Mystères de Lyon". In Le Juez, Brigitte (ed.). Clergés et cultures populaires (in French). Université de Saint-Étienne. pp. 109–118. ISBN 978-2862723242. Retrieved 1 March 2016.
  10. Clute, Johne (12 February 2016). "La Hire, Jean de". In John Clute; David Langford; Peter Nicholls; Graham Sleight (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction. Gollancz. Retrieved 1 March 2016.
  11. Manfred E. Clynes, and Nathan S. Kline, (1960) "Cyborgs and space," Astronautics, September, pp. 26–27 and 74–75; reprinted in Gray, Mentor, and Figueroa-Sarriera, eds., The Cyborg Handbook, New York: Routledge, 1995, pp. 29–34. (hardback: ISBN 0-415-90848-5; paperback: ISBN 0-415-90849-3)
  12. "Entry from OED Online". oed.com. Archived from the original on 24 August 2010.
  13. "Cyborg:Digital Destiny and Human Possibility in the Age of the Wearable Computer". By EyeTap. Retrieved 4 July 2013.
  14. "Program: Symposium SS: Bioelectronics—Materials, Interfaces, and Applications". mrs.org.
  15. Di Giacomo, Raffaele; Maresca, Bruno; Porta, Amalia; Sabatino, Paolo; Carapella, Giovanni; Neitzert, Heinz-Christoph (2013). "Candida albicans/MWCNTS: A Stable Conductive Bio-Nanocomposite and Its Temperature-Sensing Properties". IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology. 12 (2): 111–114. Bibcode:2013ITNan..12..111D. doi:10.1109/TNANO.2013.2239308.
  16. "Otto Bock HealthCare : a global leader in healthcare products – Otto Bock". ottobockus.com. Archived from the original on 30 March 2008.
  17. Vision quest, Wired Magazine, September 2002
  18. Baker, Sherry. "Rise of the Cyborgs." Discover 29.10 (2008): 50. Science Reference Center. Web. 4 November 2012
  19. Macintyre, James BMI: the research that holds the key to hope for millions, The Independent 29 May 2008
  20. Warwick, K, Gasson, M, Hutt, B, Goodhew, I, Kyberd, P, Schulzrinne, H and Wu, X: "Thought Communication and Control: A First Step using Radiotelegraphy", IEE Proceedings on Communications, 151(3), pp.185–189, 2004
  21. Warwick, K.; Gasson, M.; Hutt, B.; Goodhew, I.; Kyberd, P.; Andrews, B.; Teddy, P.; Shad, A. (2003). "The Application of Implant Technology for Cybernetic Systems". Archives of Neurology. 60 (10): 1369–73. doi:10.1001/archneur.60.10.1369. PMID 14568806.
  22. Alfredo M. Ronchi: Eculture: Cultural Content in the Digital Age. Springer (New York, 2009). p.319 ISBN 978-3-540-75273-8
  23. Andy Miah, Emma Rich: The Medicalization of Cyberspace Routledge (New York, 2008) p.130 (Hardcover: ISBN 978-0-415-37622-8 Papercover: ISBN 978-0-415-39364-5)
  24. "I listen to color", TED Global, 27 June 2012.
  25. "Neil Harbisson - Cyborg - Artist - Activist ⋆ premium-speakers.ae". premium-speakers.ae. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  26. "This filmmaker replaced his eyeball with a camera". 23 January 2016.
  27. Ganapati, Priya (4 December 2008). "Eye Spy: Filmmaker Plans to Install Camera in His Eye Socket". Wired.
  28. "Eyeborg: Man Replaces False Eye with Bionic Camera". 2010.
  29. "Cyborgs at work: Swedish employees getting implanted with microchips". The Telegraph. Associated Press. 4 April 2017. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  30. "Cyborgs at work: Why these employees are getting implanted with microchips". Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  31. "Sapochetti: Cyber-implants going from science fiction to reality". Boston Herald. 9 April 2017. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  32. "Bitcoin Cyborg keeps currency under his skin". Metro US. 1 December 2014. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  33. Zaleski, Andrew (28 May 2016). "This hacking trend is 'dangerous' in more ways than one". CNBC. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  34. Chu, Bryant; Burnett, William; Chung, Jong Won; Bao, Zhenan (21 September 2017). "Bring on the bodyNET". Nature. 549 (7672): 328–330. Bibcode:2017Natur.549..328C. doi:10.1038/549328a. PMID 28933443.
  35. Kaser, Rachel (20 September 2017). "Researchers think a full 'bodyNET' is the platform of the future". The Next Web. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  36. Huston, Caitlin (11 February 2010). "Engineering seniors' work on prototypes extends beyond traditional classroom projects". Michigan Daily. Retrieved 3 January 2014.
  37. Brains, Backyard (3 March 2011). "Working RoboRoach Prototype Unveiled to Students of Grand Valley State University". Backyard Brains. Retrieved 2 January 2014.
  38. Upbin, B. (12 June 2013). "Science! Democracy! Roboroaches!". Forbes. Retrieved 1 January 2014.
  39. Backyard Brains, Inc. (10 June 2013). "The RoboRoach: Control a living insect from your smartphone!". Kickstarter, Inc. Retrieved 1 January 2014.
  40. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 13 January 2014. Retrieved 11 January 2014.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  41. Greenemeier, Larry. "Remote-Controlled Roaches to the Rescue? [Video]". Scientific American. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
  42. "Research Projects". berkeley.edu.
  43. Maharbiz, Michel M.; Sato, Hirotaka (2010). "Cyborg Beetles". Scientific American. 303 (6): 94–99. Bibcode:2010SciAm.303f..94M. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1210-94. PMID 21141365.
  44. "Cyborg Beetles: Hope for Future Search-and-rescue Missions". www.ntu.edu.sg. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
  45. Vo Doan, Tat Thang; Tan, Melvin Y.W.; Bui, Xuan Hien; Sato, Hirotaka (3 November 2017). "An Ultralightweight and Living Legged Robot". Soft Robotics. 5 (1): 17–23. doi:10.1089/soro.2017.0038. ISSN 2169-5172. PMID 29412086.
  46. Wakefield, J. (10 June 2013). "TEDGlobal welcomes robot cockroaches". BBC News Technology. Retrieved 8 December 2013.
  47. Hamilton, A. (1 November 2013). "Resistance is futile: PETA attempts to halt the sale of remote-controlled cyborg cockroaches". Time. Retrieved 8 December 2013.
  48. Kooser, Amanda. "Scientists create cyborg jellyfish with swimming superpowers". CNET. Retrieved 29 January 2020.
  49. Gray, Chris Hables, ed. The Cyborg Handbook. New York: Routledge, 1995
  50. Lyotard, Jean François: The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984
  51. Chorost, Michael (2008). "The Naked Ear". Technology Review. 111 (1): 72–74.
  52. Murray, Chuck (2005). "Re-wiring the Body". Design News. 60 (15): 67–72.
  53. Haddad, Michel; et al. (2004). "Improved Early Survival with the Total Artificial Heart". Artificial Organs. 28 (2): 161–165. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1594.2004.47335.x. PMID 14961955.
  54. Marsen, Sky (2008). "Becoming More Than Human: Technology and the Post-Human Condition Introduction". Journal of Evolution & Technology. 19 (1): 1–5.
  55. Baker, Sherry. "RISE OF THE CYBORGS." Discover 2008; 29(10): 50–57. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 8 March 2010.
  56. Gallagher, James (28 November 2011). "Alzheimer's: Deep brain stimulation 'reverses' disease". BBC News.
  57. Thurston, Bonnie. "Was blind, but now I see." 11. Christian Century Foundation, 2007. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 8 March 2010.
  58. "Merging the biological, electronic". Harvard Gazette. 26 August 2012.
  59. "3D-printed 'electronic glove' could help keep your heart beating for ever". The Independent. 3 March 2014.
  60. "MiniMed 670G Insulin Pump System". 22 March 2020.
  61. "t:slim X2 Insulin Pump w/ Dexcom G6 CGM - Get Started!". 22 March 2020.
  62. "DIY closed loop system (artificial pancreas)". 22 March 2020.
  63. "Beta Bionics - Introducing the iLet". 22 March 2020.
  64. The military seeks to develop 'insect cyborgs'. Washington Times (13 March 2006). Retrieved 29 August 2011.
  65. Military Plans Cyborg Sharks. LiveScience (7 March 2006). Retrieved 29 August 2011.
  66. Lal A, Ewer J, Paul A, Bozkurt A, "Surgically Implanted Micro-platforms and Microsystems in Arthropods and Methods Based Thereon", US Patent Application # US20100025527, Filed on 12/11/2007.
  67. Paul A., Bozkurt A., Ewer J., Blossey B., Lal A. (2006) Surgically Implanted Micro-Platforms in Manduca-Sexta, 2006 Solid State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head Island, June 2006, pp 209–211.
  68. Bozkurt, A.; Gilmour, R.F.; Sinha, A.; Stern, D.; Lal, A. (2009). "Insect–Machine Interface Based Neurocybernetics". IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 56 (6): 1727–1733. doi:10.1109/TBME.2009.2015460. PMID 19272983.
  69. Bozkurt A., Paul A., Pulla S., Ramkumar R., Blossey B., Ewer J., Gilmour R, Lal A. (2007) Microprobe Microsystem Platform Inserted During Early Metamorphosis to Actuate Insect Flight Muscle. 20th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS 2007), Kobe, JAPAN, January 2007, pp. 405–408.
  70. Bozkurt, Alper; Paul, Ayesa; Pulla, Siva; Ramkumar, Abhishek; Blossey, Bernd; Ewer, John; Gilmour, Robert; Lal, Amit (2007). "Microprobe microsystem platform inserted during early metamorphosis to actuate insect flight muscle". 2007 IEEE 20th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). pp. 405–408. doi:10.1109/MEMSYS.2007.4432976.
  71. Judy, Jack. "Hybrid Insect MEMS (HI-MEMS)". DARPA Microsystems Technology Office. Archived from the original on 10 February 2011. Retrieved 9 April 2013.
  72. Anthes, E. (17 February 2013). "The race to create 'insect cyborgs'". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 23 February 2013.
  73. Ornes, Stephen. "THE PENTAGON'S BEETLE BORGS." Discover 30.5 (2009): 14. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 1 March 2010.
  74. Cyborg beetles to be the US military's latest weapon. YouTube (28 October 2009). Retrieved 29 August 2011.
  75. Bozkurt A, Lal A, Gilmour R. (2009) Radio Control of Insects for Biobotic Domestication. 4th International Conference of the IEEE Neural Engineering (NER'09), Antalya, Turkey.
  76. Guizzo, Eric. "Moth Pupa + MEMS Chip = Remote Controlled Cyborg Insect." Automan. IEEE Spectrum, 17 February 2009. Web. 1 March 2010..
  77. Judy, Jack. "Hybrid Insect MEMS (HI-MEMS)". DARPA Microsystems Technology Office. Archived from the original on 10 February 2011. Retrieved 9 April 2013. The intimate control of insects with embedded microsystems will enable insect cyborgs, which could carry one or more sensors, such as a microphone or a gas sensor, to relay back information gathered from the target destination.
  78. Iyer, Vikram; Najafi, Ali; James, Johannes; Fuller, Sawyer; Gollakota, Shyamnath (15 July 2020). "Wireless steerable vision for live insects and insect-scale robots". Science Robotics. 5 (44): eabb0839. doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abb0839. ISSN 2470-9476.
  79. Aloimonos, Yiannis; Fermüller, Cornelia (15 July 2020). "A bug's-eye view". Science Robotics. 5 (44): eabd0496. doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abd0496. ISSN 2470-9476.
  80. "Cybathlon".
  81. Strickland, Eliza (12 October 2016). "At the World's First Cybathlon, Proud Cyborg Athletes Raced for the Gold". IEEE Spectrum.
  82. Extended-Body: Interview with Stelarc. Stanford.edu. Retrieved 29 August 2011.
  83. "STELARC". stelarc.org. Archived from the original on 10 September 2010.
  84. Tim Hawkinson. Tfaoi.com (25 September 2005). Retrieved 29 August 2011.
  85. Man Has Camera Screwed Into Head – Bing Videos. Bing.com. Retrieved 29 August 2011.
  86. Wafaa Bilal, NYU Artist, Gets Camera Implanted In Head. Huffington Post. Retrieved 29 August 2011.
  87. Generative Music – Brian Eno. In Motion Magazine. Retrieved 29 August 2011.
  88. "This Art Is Yours". thisartisyours.com.
  89. Tenney, Tom; "Cybernetics in Art and the Myth of the Cyborg Artist Archived 20 July 2012 at the Wayback Machine"; inc.ongruo.us; 29 December 2010; 9 March 2012.
  90. Volkart, Yvonne; "Cyborg Bodies. The End of the Progressive Body: Editorial"; medienkunstnetz.de; 9 March 2012.
  91. "What is a Cyborg - Cyborg Anthropology". cyborganthropology.com. Retrieved 16 December 2019.
  92. Taylor, Kate; "Cyborg The artist as cyborg"; theglobeandmail.com; 18 February 2011; Web; 5 March 2012. | https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/the-artist-as-cyborg/article1913032/ Archived 5 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  93. "Implantable Silicon-Silk Electronics".
  94. "I Heart Chaos – Nintendo 3DS augmented reality tattoo is awesome,..." iheartchaos.com. Archived from the original on 26 April 2012. Retrieved 23 March 2012.
  95. Noemi Tasarra-Twigg (25 July 2011). "QR Code Tattoo for the Geek". ForeverGeek.
  96. Sorrel, Charlie (20 November 2009). "The Illustrated Man: How LED Tattoos Could Make Your Skin a Screen". Wired.
  97. Digital Tattoo Interface, Jim Mielke, United States
  98. Ihde, Don (1 September 2008). "Aging: I don't want to be a cyborg!". Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 7 (3): 397–404. doi:10.1007/s11097-008-9096-0. ISSN 1568-7759.
  99. William, Gibson (2016). Neuromancer. S.I.: Penguin.
  100. "Cyborg Astronauts Needed to Colonize Space". Space.com.
  101. Cyborgs and Space, The New York Times
  102. "Health". solarstorms.org. 16 April 2017.
  103. "How long would a trip to Mars take?". nasa.gov.
  104. "NASA Eyes Crew Deep Sleep Option for Mars Mission". DNews. 10 May 2017.
  105. Clark, Andy. Natural-Born Cyborgs. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  106. García, F.C. "Nace una fundación dedicada a convertir humanos en ciborgs", La Vanguardia, 1 March 2011.
  107. Rottenschlage, Andreas "The Sound of the Cyborg" The Red Bulletin, 1 March 2011.
  108. Redacción "Una fundación se dedica a convertir humanos en ciborgs" El Comercio (Peru), 1 March 2011.
  109. Calls, Albert ""Les noves tecnologies seran part del nostre cos i extensió del cervell"" La Tribuna, 3 January 2011.
  110. Martínez, Ll. "La Fundació Cyborg s'endú el primer premi dels Cre@tic", Avui, 20 November 2010
  111. Pond, Steve "Cyborg Foundation" wins $100K Focus Forward prize Archived 14 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Chicago Tribune, 22 January 2013
  112. Carvalko, J.R. (30 September 2013). Law and policy in an era of cyborg-assisted-life: The implications of interfacing in-the-body technologies to the outer world. IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS). p. 206. doi:10.1109/ISTAS.2013.6613121. ISBN 978-1-4799-0929-2.
  113. Eastabrook, Diane (2 August 2017). "US: Wisconsin company offers optional microchips for employees". Al-Jazeera. Retrieved 5 November 2017.

Further reading

  • Balsamo, Anne. Technologies of the Gendered Body: Reading Cyborg Women. Durham: Duke University Press, 1996.
  • Caidin, Martin. Cyborg; A Novel. New York: Arbor House, 1972.
  • Clark, Andy. Natural-Born Cyborgs. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • Crittenden, Chris. "Self-Deselection: Technopsychotic Annihilation via Cyborg." Ethics & the Environment 7.2 (Autumn 2002): 127–152.
  • Franchi, Stefano, and Güven Güzeldere, eds. Mechanical Bodies, Computational Minds: Artificial Intelligence from Automata to Cyborgs. MIT Press, 2005.
  • Flanagan, Mary, and Austin Booth, eds. Reload: Rethinking Women + Cyberculture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2002.
  • Glaser, Horst Albert and Rossbach, Sabine: The Artificial Human, Frankfurt/M., Bern, New York 2011 "The Artificial Human"
  • Gray, Chris Hables. Cyborg Citizen: Politics in the Posthuman Age. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2001.
  • Gray, Chris Hables, ed. The Cyborg Handbook. New York: Routledge, 1995.
  • Grenville, Bruce, ed. The Uncanny: Experiments in Cyborg Culture. Arsenal Pulp Press, 2002.
  • Halacy, D. S. Cyborg: Evolution of the Superman. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.
  • Halberstam, Judith, and Ira Livingston. Posthuman Bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995.
  • Haraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women; The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1990.
  • Haraway, Donna. "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century." The Transgender Studies Reader. Eds. Susan Stryker and Stephen Whittle. New York: Routledge, 2006. pp. 103–118.
  • Klugman, Craig. "From Cyborg Fiction to Medical Reality." Literature and Medicine 20.1 (Spring 2001): 39–54.
  • Kurzweil, Ray. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking, 2005.
  • Mann, Steve. "Telematic Tubs against Terror: Bathing in the Immersive Interactive Media of the Post-Cyborg Age." Leonardo 37.5 (October 2004): 372–373.
  • Mann, Steve, and Hal Niedzviecki. Cyborg: digital destiny and human possibility in the age of the wearable computer Doubleday, 2001. ISBN 0-385-65825-7 (A paperback version also exists, ISBN 0-385-65826-5).
  • Masamune Shirow, Ghost in the Shell. Endnotes, 1991. Kodansha ISBN 4-7700-2919-5.
  • Mertz, David (1989). "Cyborgs" (PDF). International Encyclopedia of Communications. Blackwell 2008. ISBN 978-0-19-504994-7. Retrieved 28 October 2008.
  • Mitchell, Kaye. "Bodies That Matter: Science Fiction, Technoculture, and the Gendered Body." Science Fiction Studies.Vol. 33, No. 1, Technoculture and Science Fiction (Mar., 2006), pp. 109–128
  • Mitchell, William. Me++: The Cyborg Self and the Networked City. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2003.
  • Muri, Allison. The Enlightenment Cyborg: A History of Communications and Control in the Human Machine, 1660–1830. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006.
  • Muri, Allison (2003). "Of Shit and the Soul: Tropes of Cybernetic Disembodiment" (PDF). Body & Society. 9 (3): 73–92. doi:10.1177/1357034x030093005.
  • Nicogossian, Judith. From Reconstruction to the Augmentation of the Human Body in Restorative Medicine and in Cybernetics THESIS in Biological and Cultural Anthropology (2011). http://eprints.qut.edu.au/31911/
  • Nishime, LeiLani (2005). "The Mulatto Cyborg: Imagining a Multiracial Future". Cinema Journal. 44 (2): 34–49. doi:10.1353/cj.2005.0011.
  • The Oxford English dictionary. 2nd ed. edited by J.A. Simpson and E.S.C. Weiner. Oxford: Clarendon Press; Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1989. Vol 4 p. 188.
  • Rorvik, David M. As Man Becomes Machine: the Evolution of the Cyborg. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1971.
  • Rushing, Janice Hocker, and Thomas S. Frentz. Projecting the Shadow: The Cyborg Hero in American Film. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  • Smith, Marquard, and Joanne Morra, eds. The Prosthetic Impulse: From a Posthuman Present to a Biocultural Future. MIT Press, 2005.
  • The science fiction handbook for readers and writers. By George S. Elrick. Chicago: Chicago Review Press, 1978, p. 77.
  • The science fiction encyclopaedia. General editor, Peter Nicholls, associate editor, John Clute, technical editor, Carolyn Eardley, contributing editors, Malcolm Edwards, Brian Stableford. 1st ed. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1979, p. 151.
  • Warwick, Kevin. I, Cyborg, University of Illinois Press, 2004.
  • Yoshito Ikada, Bio Materials: an approach to Artificial Organs
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.