Chigils

The Chigil (Chihil, and also (D)Jigil, Cihil, Chiyal) were a Turkic tribe known from the 7th century CE as living around Issyk Kul lake area. They were considered to be descended from two Yueban tribes: Chuyue and Chumi.

Etymology

Sinologist Yu. A. Zuev notes that the Chinese transcription of Chigil, 處月 Chǔyuè (Middle Chinese (ZS): /t͡ɕʰɨʌˣ-ŋʉɐt̚/) may be calqued as "abode of the Moon [god]"; whereas 處密 Chǔmì (/t͡ɕʰɨʌˣ-mˠiɪt̚/)) as "abode of the Sun [god]", for Chinese 密 transcribed Middle Iranian theonym Mihr, the all-seeing Zoroastrian deity of covenent, oath, and light, vaguely associated with the Sun. However, Zuev cautions that neither Turkic-Buddhist texts, nor the Turkic-Manichaean literature and other sources containing information about Turkic Manichaeism, give a genealogical meaning in reference to the invocation of the Sun and Moon (Turk. kün ay).[1]

Confusingly, Zuev also compares Chigil to Persian čihil "forty".[2][3] Earlier, H. W. Bailey derived *Čömül (Ar. Jumul جمل) from Iranic *čamṛta < čam- "to stride out like a warrior", thus "warrior striders"[4]

History

Hamilton (1962) and Zuev (2002) saw the first reference to the Chigil as 職乙 (Zhiyi), whose Middle Chinese pronunciation was reconstructed by Zuev as tšįək-iət, as a Tiele tribe mentioned in Book of Sui, compiled by Wei Zheng.[5][6] However, the original manuscript contains no punctuation, so different scholars read and reconstruct the ethonyms differently: for example, 薄落職乙咥 may also be read as Boluozhi and Yidie[7]

According to medieval writers, the city of Chigil was at "a distance of a human voice" from Taraz.[8][9] An 11th-century story by Mahmud Kashgari proposed a folk etymology of Chigil, which he dated back to the time of the Zu-l-Karnein ("the "Bihorn", i.e. Alexander the Great) 4th century BCE:

When the armies of Zu-l-Karnein reached Talas in the Manichean country Argu, a heavy rainstorm formed thick mud. The road became impassable, and angry Zu-l-Karnein exclaimed in Persian: "In chi gil ast?!" – "What is this mud?! We cannot get out of it!" He ordered a building be erected on the spot called Chigil. Turks in the area were called Chigils. Nomadic Turks, who adopted the Chigil type of [long] clothes were also called Chigils, from Djeyhun (Amu Darya) to the Chin (China).[10] ... The nomad Chigil (as well as the Tukhsī) lived near the township of Quyās lying beyond Barsghān and watered by the two Keykān rivers flowing into the Ili[11] ... Another group of the tribe lived in the township of Chigil, near Ṭarāz, and a third one in the villages of the same name near Kāshgar.

Kashghari[12] says that the Oghuz Turks used to call "Chigil" all the Turks between the Oxus and Northern China.[13]

A splinter group from the Chigils was the Shatuo 沙陀. A Shatuo noble, Keyong, was from the Shatuo Dragon tribe, bore the surname Zhuye 朱耶 ~ Zhuxie 朱邪, and later adopted the surname Li of the Tang emperors,[14] first bestowed on Keyong's father Zhuxie Chixin.[15] Keyong's son Li Cunxu would found of the Later Tang dynasty (923–936) in Northern China, elevating the Shatuo to a regnal clan. Among the Shatuo, the dragon cult was predominant. The annals noted that Shatuo prayers "followed the old tradition of the northern custom" near Thunder-mountain, at the Dragon Gate.[16][17][18][19]

Zuev paraphrases Sima Guang's Zizhi Tongjian, chpater 223, that "Shatuo is originally (or, at root, 本 běn) a Zhuxie tribe";[20] Zuev further asserts that Zhuxie reflects the Turkic jüz "hundred". The Chigil-Shatuo were Manichaeans, and "hundred" is not always a military team, but also a religious category yüz er "hundred monk men" as is stated, for example, on a number of the Manichaean Yenisei monuments of ancient Turkic writings. Thus yüz er, as opposed to otuz oglan or otuz er, is a category of dominating level.[21]

The Chigils were prominent in the Kara-Khanid Khanate, where they formed the main body of the troops.[22] The power in the Karakhanid state was divided between the nobility of two tribal groups, Chigils and Yagma, which in the 9th century formed the nucleus of the Karluk tribal union.

Chigils and Yagma, and also the Tuhsi, one of the Türgesh tribes,[23][24] the remains of the Orkhon Turks, united in the Karluk tribal union, and the history of these tribes, at least since the 9th century, is indivisible.[25] The Hudud al-'Ālam, compiled in 982–3 CE, describes the Chigils as members of the Karluk state, occupying the Zhetysu territories including regions around Issyk Kul to the north and east of the Karluks. They are described as possessing great riches and that their king "is one of themselves." It is also reported that "Some of them worship the Sun and the stars.".[26] The Karluk Kaganate was divided into two parts, eastern and western, headed by their Kagans. The eastern Kagan was the senior Kagan, with his court in Kashgar and Balasagun (Buran fortress, near Tokmak in Kyrgyzstan). He was from the Chigil tribe and had the title Arslan Kara-Hakan. The western was the lesser Kagan, from the Yagma tribe, with the title Bogra Kara-Kagan and his court in Taraz, and later in Samarkand.[27]

In the eleventh century the Chigils became independent. Kashgari writes that they consisted of three branches.[28]

After the Mongol invasion of Turkestan, the Turks in northern Turkestan and in the Tien Shan region, among them the Chigils, Yagma, Karluks, Argu and Tuhsi, had to give up their territory to the eastern nomadic groups. They migrated to Transoxania and Kashgharia.[29]

There are presently four villages in Turkey called Chigil, indicating that some Chigils migrated to Asia Minor after the Mongol invasion.[30]

Religion

The Chigil were known for their religious dedication. The first depictions of the Chigils describe them as adherents of Manichaeism. Later sources describe the Chigils as Nestorian Christians. The Zhetysu area, a former Chigil territory, is rich with Christian and pre-Christian archaeological remains, and the Talas area is especially saturated with religious monuments and historical reports. the Gagauzes, a distinct Pontic Turkic tribe known for their steadfast adherence to Greek Orthodox Christianity, have a folk legend associating their descent from the Chigils.

In Manichaeism, the lion, mighty and ruthless king of animals, is a central image. This demonstrates an imported ideology; the lion is not native to Central Asia, and so it originally did not have symbolic significance for the population there. The building found by the archaeologists, without traces of economic activities, served as a chapel of the inhabitants depicted in long robes: the Chigils, whose symbol was a lion (Turk. Arslan, Bars).[31]

The connection between Talas, Manichaeism and the Lion is recorded in the Turco-Manichean "Sacred book of two fundamentals" (Iki jïltïz nom), fragments of which were found in 1907 at Kara-Khoja in the Turpan oasis by Albert von Le Coq. The book was dedicated to the ruler (Beg) of the Chigil-Arslan tribes, named Il-Tirgüg, Ap-Burguchan, Alp-Tarhan [Henning, 1977, p. 552]. It was completed in Argu-Talas city (Altun Argu Talas). A postscript in the manuscript noted an Arslan Mengü that used the book.[32] Talas had four Manichean cloisters: in the Chigil-balyk, Kashu, Ordu-kent and Yigyan-kent.[33]

In the middle of the 7th century, Chigils, Chumuls and Karluks were united by the Western Turkic yabgu Ashina Helu in his anti-Tang uprising. Zuev reconstructs Helu's Old Turkic name as *Aru, which, he contends, is identical with the Turkic-Manichean arïg (like arïg dïntar "pure priest").[34]

Toponymic traces

Many settlements recorded in medieval sources have names derived from the ethnonym Chigil, such as Chigilkant and Chigil-balyk in Xinjiang, and Chigil in the Zhetysu area:[35] During the Middle Ages, a city, Yar, is mentioned as located on the southern bank of lake Issyk-kul. This city is the capital of the leader of the Djikil (i.e. Chigil) tribe.[36] The city retained its name in the form Chal till present. The various forms of this toponym (Shiyan, Shal, Chal) come from the Turkic ethnonym Chiyal (i.e. Chigil).[37] The ethnotoponym Chigil is formed with an affix -il (Turk. land, country).[38]

gollark: Oh, I just compose key™.
gollark: Hmm, like what symbols? Sounds like one of the octillion unicode table websites.
gollark: Unless they're not, obviously.
gollark: Suggestions will be accepted.
gollark: One thing I was considering doing for April Fools was "osmarks.tk™2.0" (or 3.0 now), which would have constant random loading screens, randomly download 2MB of Javascript (or say it was), sell all your data to Facebook (well, say it's doing that), have an unusable new style which looks like it was made for mobile devices, and randomly crash.

References
  • Prof. Yu. A. Zuev, Early Turks: Essays of history and ideology
  • Chavannes, Édouard (1900), Documents sur les Tou-kiue (Turcs) occidentaux. Paris, Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient. Reprint: Taipei. Cheng Wen Publishing Co. 1969.
  • Findley, Carter Vaughn, The Turks in World History. Oxford University Press, (2005). ISBN 0-19-516770-8; 0-19-517726-6 (pbk.)
  1. Zuev, Yu.A. (2002) Early Turks: Essays on History and Ideology, Almaty Daik Press. p. 221, 249 (in Russian)
  2. [Bang, Gabain, 1931, p. 333; Bang, Gabain, Rachmati, 1934, p. 159]
  3. Yu. Zuev, "Early Türks: Essays of history and ideology", Almaty, Daik-Press, 2002, p. 249, 146ISBN 9985-4-4152-9 (in Russian)
  4. Golden, Peter B. (2007). "Cumanica V: The Basmils and Qipčaqs". Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi 15: 15–16.
  5. Hamilton J. "Toquz-Oghuz et On-Uyghur." Journal Asiatique. No 250, 1962 p. 26
  6. Zuev, Yu.A. (2002) Early Turks: Essays on History and Ideology, Almaty Daik Press. p. 220 (in Russian)
  7. Cheng, Fanyi. "The Research on the Identification between the Tiele (鐵勒) and the Oğuric tribes" in Archivum Eurasiae Medii AeviARCHIVUM EURASIAE ed. Th. T. Allsen, P. B. Golden, R. K. Kovalev, A. P. Martinez. 19 (2012). Harrassowitz Verlag, Wiesbaden. p. 104-108
  8. Volin, 1960, p. 81-82
  9. Zuev, "Early Turks: Essays of history and ideology", Almaty, Daik-Press, 2002, p. 191, ISBN 9985-4-4152-9
  10. Zuev, "Early Turks: Essays of history and ideology", Almaty, Daik-Press, 2002, p. 191, ISBN 9985-4-4152-9
  11. ibid., iii, 132, v.i., p. 301, note 4. Quyash ("Sun" in Turkish) is supposed to have lain on the left bank of the Ili; in Mongol times it was the camping place of Chagatay
  12. Kāshgharī, i, 330
  13. Minorsky, V. Hudud al-'Ālam. "Regions of the world. A Persian Geography 372 A. H. – 982 A. D." London, 1937, pp. 298–299
  14. Malyavkin, 1974, p. 100; Li Fan, Ch. 425, p. 3458-3459
  15. Barenghi, Maddalena (2019). "Representations of Descent: Origin and Migration Stories of the Ninth- and Tenth-century Turkic Shatuo" (PDF). Asia Major. 3d. 32.1: 57–58.
  16. Se Tszüichjen, Ch. 32, p. 225, f. 4b
  17. Zuev, "Early Turks: Essays of history and ideology", Almaty, Daik-Press, 2002, p. 145, ISBN 9985-4-4152-9
  18. Ouyang Xiu. Xin Wudaishi. Vol. 4
  19. Atwood, Christopher P. (2010). "The Notion of Tribe in Medieval China: Ouyang Xiu and the Shatup Dynastic Myth". Miscellanea Asiatica: 600–604.
  20. Zizhi Tongjian, vol. 223 "沙陀姓朱耶，世居沙陀磧，因以為名。" tr. "The Shatuo is surnamed Zhuye. For generations they have been dwelling amid sandy slopes and dunes. So they use those as name"
  21. Zuev, "Early Turks: Essays of history and ideology", Almaty, Daik-Press, 2002, p. 146, ISBN 9985-4-4152-9
  22. Barthold, Turkestan, 317.
  23. Gumilyov, L. Searches for an Imaginary Kingdom: The trefoil of the Bird's Eye View' Ch. 5: The Shattered Silence (961-1100)
  24. Pylypchuk, Ya. "Turks and Muslims: From Confrontation to Conversion to Islam (End of VII century - Beginning of XI Century)" in UDK 94 (4): 95 (4). In Ukrainian
  25. S. G. Klyashtorny, T. I. Sultanov, "States And Peoples of the Eurasian Steppe", St. Petersburg, 2004, p.117, ISBN 5-85803-255-9
  26. Minorsky, V. Hudud al-'Ālam. "Regions of the world. A Persian Geography 372 A. H. – 982 A. D." London, 1937, pp. 98–99
  27. S. G. Klyashtorny, T. I. Sultanov, "States And Peoples of the Eurasian Steppe", St. Petersburg, 2004, p.118, ISBN 5-85803-255-9
  28. Faruk Sumer, "Oguzlar", Ankara, 1967, p. 27
  29. Z. V. Togan, "Turkistan Tarihi", Istanbul, 1947, p. 60, note 80
  30. Faruk Sumer, "Oguzlar", Ankara, 1967, p. 27
  31. Yu. Zuev, "Early Türks: Essays of history and ideology", Almaty, Daik-Press, 2002, p. 193, ISBN 9985-4-4152-9
  32. Zuev, "Early Turks: Essays of history and ideology", Almaty, Daik-Press, 2002, p. 203, ISBN 9985-4-4152-9
  33. Yu. Zuev, "Early Türks: Essays of history and ideology", Almaty, Daik-Press, 2002, p. 207, ISBN 9985-4-4152-9
  34. Zuev, "Early Turks: Essays of history and ideology", Almaty, Daik-Press, 2002, p. 221, ISBN 9985-4-4152-9
  35. Sh. Kamoliddin, "Ancient Türkic Toponyms of the Middle Asia", Tashkent, Shark, 2006, p. 42 (in Russian, no ISBN)
  36. Sh. Kamoliddin, "Ancient Türkic Toponyms of the Middle Asia", Tashkent, Shark, 2006, p. 92
  37. Sh. Kamoliddin, "Ancient Türkic Toponyms of the Middle Asia", Tashkent, Shark, 2006, p. 126
  38. Sh. Kamoliddin, "Ancient Türkic Toponyms of the Middle Asia", Tashkent, Shark, 2006, p. 74
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.