Amborella

Amborella is a monotypic genus of understory shrubs or small trees endemic to the main island, Grande Terre, of New Caledonia.[4] The genus is the only member of the family Amborellaceae and the order Amborellales and contains a single species, Amborella trichopoda.[5] Amborella is of great interest to plant systematists because molecular phylogenetic analyses consistently place it as the sister group to all other flowering plants.

Amborella
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Order: Amborellales
Melikyan, A.V.Bobrov, & Zaytzeva[1]
Family: Amborellaceae
Pichon[1]
Genus: Amborella
Baill.[2]
Species:
A. trichopoda
Binomial name
Amborella trichopoda

Description

Amborella is a sprawling shrub or small tree up to 8 m high. It bears alternate, simple evergreen leaves without stipules.[5][6] The leaves are two-ranked, with distinctly serrated or rippled margins, and about 8 to 10 cm long.[6]

Amborella has xylem tissue that differs from that of most other flowering plants. The xylem of Amborella contains only tracheids; vessel elements are absent.[7] Xylem of this form has long been regarded as a primitive feature of flowering plants.[8]

Buds and staminate ("male") flowers of Amborella

The species is dioecious. This means that each plant produces either "male flowers" (meaning that they have functional stamens) or "female flowers" (flowers with functional carpels), but not both.[9] At any one time, a dioecious plant produces only functionally staminate or functionally carpellate flowers. Staminate ("male") Amborella flowers do not have carpels, whereas the carpellate ("female") flowers have non-functional "staminodes", structures resembling stamens in which no pollen develops. Plants may change from one reproductive morphology to the other. In one study, seven cuttings from a staminate plant produced, as expected, staminate flowers at their first flowering, but three of the seven produced carpellate flowers at their second flowering.[10]

The small, creamy white flowers are arranged in inflorescences borne in the axils of foliage leaves.[11] The inflorescences have been described as cymes, with up to three orders of branching, each branch being terminated by a flower.[11] Each flower is subtended by bracts.[11] The bracts transition into a perianth of undifferentiated tepals.[11] The tepals typically are arranged in a spiral, but sometimes are whorled at the periphery.

Carpellate flowers are roughly 3 to 4 mm in diameter, with 7 or 8 tepals. There are 1 to 3 (or rarely 0) well-differentiated staminodes and a spiral of 4 to 8 free (apocarpous) carpels. Carpels bear green ovaries; they lack a style. They contain a single ovule with the micropyle directed downwards. Staminate flowers are approximately 4 to 5 mm in diameter, with 6 to 15 tepals. These flowers bear 10 to 21 spirally arranged stamens, which become progressively smaller toward the center. The innermost may be sterile, amounting to staminodes. Stamens bear triangular anthers on short broad filaments. An anther consists of four pollen sacs, two on each side, with a small sterile central connective. The anthers have connective tips with small bumps and may be covered with secretions.[12] These features suggest that, as with other basal angiosperms, there is a high degree of developmental plasticity.[10]

Typically, 1 to 3 carpels per flower develop into fruit. The fruit is an ovoid red drupe (approximately 5 to 7 mm long and 5 mm wide) borne on a short (1 to 2 mm) stalk. The remains of the stigma can be seen at the tip of the fruit. The skin is papery, surrounding a thin fleshy layer containing a red juice. The inner pericarp is lignified and surrounds the single seed. The embryo is small and surrounded by copious endosperm.[13]

Phylogeny

Currently plant systematists accept Amborella trichopoda as the most basal lineage in the clade of angiosperms.[14] In systematics the term "basal" describes a lineage that diverges near the base of a phylogeny, and thus earlier than other lineages. Since Amborella is apparently basal among the flowering plants, the features of early flowering plants can be inferred by comparing derived traits shared by the main angiosperm lineage but not present in Amborella. These traits are presumed to have evolved after the divergence of the Amborella lineage.

One early twentieth century idea of "primitive" (i.e. ancestral) floral traits in angiosperms, accepted until relatively recently, is the Magnolia blossom model. This envisions flowers with numerous parts arranged in spirals on an elongated, cone-like receptacle rather than the small numbers of parts in distinct whorls of more derived flowers.

In a study designed to clarify relationships between well-studied model plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana, and the basal angiosperms Amborella, Nuphar (Nymphaeaceae), Illicium, the monocots, and more derived angiosperms (eudicots), chloroplast genomes using cDNA and expressed sequence tags for floral genes, the cladogram shown below was generated.[15]

extant seed plants
 

gymnosperms

 
angiosperms
 

Amborella

 
 
 

Nuphar

 
 
 

Illicium

 
 
 

monocots

 
 

magnoliids

 
 

eudicots

 
 
 
 
 
 

This hypothesized relationship of the extant seed plants places Amborella as the sister taxon to all other angiosperms, and shows the gymnosperms as a monophyletic group sister to the angiosperms. It supports the theory that Amborella branched off from the main lineage of angiosperms before the ancestors of any other living angiosperms. There is however some uncertainty about the relationship between the Amborellaceae and the Nymphaeales: one theory is that the Amborellaceae alone are the monophyletic sister to the extant angiosperms; another proposes that the Amborellaceae and Nymphaeales form a clade that is the sister group to all other extant angiosperms.[15]

Because of its evolutionary position at the base of the flowering plant clade, there was support for sequencing the complete genome of Amborella trichopoda to serve as a reference for evolutionary studies. In 2010, the US National Science Foundation began a genome sequencing effort in Amborella, and the draft genome sequence was posted on the project website in December 2013.[16]

Classification

Amborella is the only genus in the family Amborellaceae. The APG II system recognized this family, but left it unplaced at order rank due to uncertainty about its relationship to the family Nymphaeaceae. In the more recent APG systems, APG III and APG IV, the Amborellaceae comprise the monotypic order Amborellales at the base of the angiosperm phylogeny.[1][14]

Older systems

The Cronquist system, of 1981, classified the family:[17][18]

Order Laurales
Subclass Magnoliidae
Class Magnoliopsida [=dicotyledons]
Division Magnoliophyta [=angiosperms]

The Thorne system (1992) classified it:[19][20]

Order Magnoliales
Superorder Magnolianae
Subclass Magnoliideae [=dicotyledons]
Class Magnoliopsida [=angiosperms]

The Dahlgren system classified it:[21]

Order Laurales
Superorder Magnolianae
Subclass Magnoliideae [=dicotyledons],
Class Magnoliopsida [=angiosperms].

Genomic and evolutionary considerations

Amborella is of great interest to plant systematists because molecular phylogenetic analyses consistently place it at or near the base of the flowering plant lineage.[22][23][24] That is, the Amborellaceae represent a line of flowering plants that diverged very early on (about 130 million years ago) from all the other extant species of flowering plants, and, among extant flowering plants, is the sister group to the other flowering plants.[22] Comparing characteristics of this basal angiosperm, other flowering plants and fossils may provide clues about how flowers first appeared—what Darwin called the "abominable mystery".[25] This position is consistent with a number of conservative characteristics of its physiology and morphology; for example, the wood of Amborella lacks the vessels characteristic of most flowering plants.[5]

Amborella, being an understory plant in the wild, is commonly in intimate contact with shade- and moisture-dependent organisms such as algae, lichens and mosses. In those circumstances, some horizontal gene transfer between Amborella and such associated species is not surprising in principle, but the scale of such transfer has caused considerable surprise. Sequencing the Amborella mitochondrial genome revealed that for every gene of its own origin, it contains about six versions from the genomes of an assortment of the plants and algae growing with or upon it. The evolutionary and physiological significance of this is not as yet clear, nor in particular is it clear whether the horizontal gene transfer has anything to do with the apparent stability and conservatism of the species.[26][27]

Ecology

Amborella is typically dioecious, but has been known to change sex in cultivation.[5] Amborella has a mixed pollination system, relying on both insect pollinators and wind.[9]

Conservation

The islands of New Caledonia are a biodiversity hot-spot, preserving many early diverging lineages of plants, of which Amborella is but one. This preservation has been ascribed to climate stability during and since the Tertiary (66 to 3 million years ago), stability that has permitted the continued survival of tropical forests on New Caledonia. In contrast, drought conditions dominated the Australian climate towards the end of the Tertiary. Current threats to biodiversity in New Caledonia include fires, mining, agriculture, invasion by introduced species, urbanization and global warming.[23] The importance of conserving Amborella has been dramatically stated by Pillon: "The disappearance of Amborella trichopoda would imply the disappearance of a genus, a family and an entire order, as well as the only witness to at least 140 million years of evolutionary history."[28] Conservation strategies targeted on relic species are recommended, both preserving a diversity of habitats in New Caledonia and ex-situ conservation in cultivation.[23]

  • Amborella trichopoda plant
  • Young leaves with serrated margins
gollark: I think Windows is mostly "let's just have five proprietary solutions for it which break lots".
gollark: I mean, it's more lightweight, much more customisable, free, and better for developers.
gollark: It could probably beat windows easily, even.
gollark: You could use the WSL, maybe.
gollark: > 10also a problem.

References
  1. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III (2009). "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 161 (2): 105–121. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x.
  2. IPNI Plant Name Query Results for Amborella. The International Plant Names Index. 10. Retrieved 2013-09-03.
  3. IPNI Plant Name Query Results for Amborella trichopoda. The International Plant Names Index. 1. Retrieved 2013-09-03.
  4. Jérémie, J. (1982). "Amborellacées". In A. Aubréville; J. F. Leroy (eds.). Flore de La Nouvelle-Calédonie et Dépendances (in French). 11. Paris: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. pp. 157–160.
  5. Große-Veldmann, B.; Korotkova, N.; Reinken, B.; Lobin, W. & Barthlott, W. (2011). "Amborella trichopoda — Cultivation of the most ancestral angiosperm in botanic gardens". The Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture. 9: 143–155. Retrieved 2016-10-21.
  6. Simpson, M.G. (2010). Plant Systematics (2nd ed.). Elsevier. p. 186
  7. Carlquist, S. J. & Schneider, E. L. (2001). "Vegetative anatomy of the New Caledonian endemic Amborella trichopoda: relationships with the Illiciales and implications for vessel origin". Pacific Science. 55 (3): 305–312. doi:10.1353/psc.2001.0020. hdl:10125/2455.
  8. Sporne, K.R. (1974). The Morphology of Angiosperms. London: Hutchinson. ISBN 978-0-09-120611-6. p. 98.
  9. Thien, L. B.; Sage, T. L.; Jaffré, T.; Bernhardt, P.; Pontieri, V.; Weston, P. H.; Malloch, D.; Azuma, H.; Graham, S. W.; McPherson, M. A.; Rai, H. S.; Sage, R. F. & Dupre, J.-L. (2003). "The Population Structure and Floral Biology of Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae)". Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 90 (3): 466–490. doi:10.2307/3298537. JSTOR 3298537.
  10. Buzgo, M.; Soltis, P. S. & Soltis, D. E. (2004). "Floral Developmental Morphology of Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae)". International Journal of Plant Sciences. 165 (6): 925–947. doi:10.1086/424024.
  11. Posluszny, U.; Tomlinson, P.B. (2003), "Aspects of inflorescence and floral development in the putative basal angiosperm Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae)", Canadian Journal of Botany, 81 (1): 28–39, doi:10.1139/b03-004
  12. Endress, P. K. & Igersheim, Anton (2000). "The Reproductive Structures of the Basal Angiosperm Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae)". International Journal of Plant Sciences. Current Perspectives on Basal Angiosperms. 161 (S6): S237–S248. doi:10.1086/317571.
  13. Floyd, S.K. & Friedman, W.E. (2001). "Developmental evolution of endosperm in basal angiosperms: evidence from Amborella (Amborellaceae), Nuphar (Nymphaceae), and Illicium (Illiciaceae)". Plant Systematics and Evolution. 228 (3–4): 153–169. doi:10.1007/s006060170026.
  14. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016), "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV", Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 181 (1): 1–20, doi:10.1111/boj.12385CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  15. Albert, V. A.; Soltis, D. E.; Carlson, J. E.; Farmerie, W. G.; Wall, P. K.; Ilut, D. C.; Solow, T. M.; Mueller, L. A.; Landherr, L. L.; Hu, Y.; Buzgo, M.; Kim, S.; Yoo, M.-J.; Frohlich, M. W.; Perl-Treves, R.; Schlarbaum, S. E.; Zhang, X.; Tanksley, S. D.; Oppenheimer, D. G.; Soltis, P. S.; Ma, H.; dePamphilis, C. W. & Leebens-Mack, H. (2005). "Floral gene resources from basal angiosperms for comparative genomics research". BMC Plant Biology. 5: 5. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-5-5. PMC 1083416. PMID 15799777.
  16. Amborella Genome Database
  17. Cronquist, A. (1981). An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231038805.
  18. Cronquist, A. (1988). The evolution and classification of flowering plants (2nd ed.). Bronx, NY: New York Botanical Garden.
  19. Thorne, Robert F. (1992). "Classification and geography of flowering plants". Botanical Review. 58 (3): 225–348. doi:10.1007/BF02858611.
  20. Thorne, Robert F. (1992). "An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants". Aliso. 13 (2): 365–389. doi:10.5642/aliso.19921302.08.
  21. Dahlgren, R.M.T. (1980). "A revised system of classification of the angiosperms". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 80 (2): 91–124. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1980.tb01661.x.
  22. Soltis, P. S. & Soltis, D. E. (2013). "Angiosperm Phylogeny: A Framework for Studies of Genome Evolution". In Leitch, Ilia J.; Greilhuber, Johann; Doležel, Jaroslav & Wendel, Jonathan F. (eds.). Plant Genome Diversity. Volume 2. Springer. pp. 1–11. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-1160-4_1. ISBN 978-3-7091-1160-4.
  23. Pillon, Y. (2008). Biodiversité, origine et évolution des Cunoniaceae : implications pour la conservation de la flore de Nouvelle-Calédonie (PDF) (PhD) (in French and English). University of New Caledonia. Retrieved 2013-06-22.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  24. Drew, B. T.; Ruhfel, B. R.; Smith, S. A.; Moore, M. J.; Briggs, B. G.; Gitzendanner, M. A.; Soltis, P. S.; Soltis, D. E. (2014). "Another Look at the Root of the Angiosperms Reveals a Familiar Tale". Systematic Biology. 63 (3): 368–382. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syt108. PMID 24391149.
  25. W. E. Friedman (2009), "The meaning of Darwin's "abominable mystery"", American Journal of Botany, 96 (1): 5–21, doi:10.3732/ajb.0800150, PMID 21628174
  26. Megan Scudellari. Genomes Gone Wild, January 1, 2014 |
  27. Rice, D. W.; Alverson, A. J.; Richardson, A. O.; Young, G. J.; Sanchez-Puerta, M. V.; Munzinger, J.; Barry, K.; Boore, J. L.; Zhang, Y.; dePamphilis, C. W.; Knox, E. B.; Palmer, J. D. (19 December 2013). "Horizontal Transfer of Entire Genomes via Mitochondrial Fusion in the Angiosperm Amborella". Science. 342 (6165): 1468–1473. Bibcode:2013Sci...342.1468R. doi:10.1126/science.1246275. hdl:11336/2616. PMID 24357311.
  28. Pillon 2008, p. 55. "La disparition d’Amborella trichopoda impliquerait donc la disparition d’un genre, d’une famille et d’un ordre entier, ainsi que le seul témoin d’au moins 140 millions d’années d’histoire évolutive."

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.