Basal angiosperms

The basal angiosperms are the flowering plants which diverged from the lineage leading to most flowering plants. In particular, the most basal angiosperms were called the ANITA grade which is made up of Amborella (a single species of shrub from New Caledonia), Nymphaeales (water lilies, together with some other aquatic plants) and Austrobaileyales (woody aromatic plants including star anise).[1]

Nymphaea alba, from the Nymphaeales

ANITA stands for Amborella, Nymphaeales and I lliciales, Trimeniaceae-Austrobaileya.[2] Some authors have shortened this to ANA-grade for the three orders, Amborellales, Nymphaeales, and Austrobaileyales, since the order I lliciales was reduced to the family Illiciaceae and placed, along with the family Trimeniaceae, within the Austrobaileyales.

The basal angiosperms are only a few hundred species, compared with hundreds of thousands of species of eudicots, monocots, and magnoliids. They diverged from the ancestral angiosperm lineage before the five groups comprising the mesangiosperms diverged from each other.

Phylogeny
Japanese star anise (Illicium anisatum), from the Austrobaileyales

The exact relationships between Amborella, Nymphaeales and Austrobaileyales are not yet clear. Although most studies show that Amborella and Nymphaeales are more basal than Austrobaileyales, and all three are more basal than the mesangiosperms, there is significant molecular evidence in favor of two different trees, one in which Amborella is sister to the rest of the angiosperms, and one in which a clade of Amborella and Nymphaeales is in this position. A 2014 paper says that it presents "the most convincing evidence to date that Amborella plus Nymphaeales together represent the earliest diverging lineage of extant angiosperms".[3] A number of other studies identify Amborella the most basal of all angiosperms.[4][5][6][7][8][9]

Angiospermae
 

Amborella

 
 
 

Nymphaeales

 
 
 

Austrobaileyales

 
 

Mesangiospermae

 
 
 
 
Angiospermae
 
 

Amborella

 
 

Nymphaeales

 
 
 
 

Austrobaileyales

 
 

Mesangiospermae

 
 
 

Older terms
Amborella

Paleodicots (sometimes spelled "palaeodicots") is an informal name used by botanists (Spichiger & Savolainen 1997,[10] Leitch et al. 1998[11]) to refer to angiosperms which are not monocots or eudicots.

The paleodicots correspond to Magnoliidae sensu Cronquist 1981 (minus Ranunculales and Papaverales) and to Magnoliidae sensu Takhtajan 1980 (Spichiger & Savolainen 1997). Some of the paleodicots share apparently plesiomorphic characters with monocots, e.g., scattered vascular bundles, trimerous flowers, and non-tricolpate pollen.

The "paleodicots" are not a monophyletic group and the term has not been widely adopted. The APG II system does not recognize a group called "paleodicots" but assigns these early-diverging dicots to several orders and unplaced families: Amborellaceae, Nymphaeaceae (including Cabombaceae), Austrobaileyales, Ceratophyllales (not included among the "paleodicots" by Leitch et al. 1998), Chloranthaceae, and the magnoliid clade (orders Canellales, Piperales, Laurales, and Magnoliales). Subsequent research has added Hydatellaceae to the paleodicots.

The term paleoherb is another older term for flowering plants which are neither eudicots nor monocots.[12]

gollark: Mindbreak IS to occur for osmarks.tk classified project 03843.
gollark: > <@160279332454006795> all in due time, apioform<@319753218592866315> Due time is now, metaapiocryohazard.
gollark: I pronounce it as "gife", the right way.
gollark: Irrelevant, apioform.
gollark: Further evidence of sinthorion banned?

References
  1. Thien, L. B.; Bernhardt, P.; Devall, M. S.; Chen, Z.-d.; Luo, Y.-b.; Fan, J.-H.; Yuan, L.-C.; Williams, J. H. (2009), "Pollination biology of basal angiosperms (ANITA grade)", American Journal of Botany, 96 (1): 166–182, doi:10.3732/ajb.0800016, PMID 21628182
  2. Yin-Long Qiu; Jungho Lee; Fabiana Bernasconi-Quadroni; Douglas E. Soltis; Pamela S. Soltis; Michael Zanis; Elizabeth A. Zimmer; Zhiduan Chen; Vincent Savolainen; Mark W. Chase (1999). "The earliest angiosperms: Evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes". Nature. 402 (6760): 404–407. doi:10.1038/46536. PMID 10586879.
  3. Xi, Zhenxiang; Liu, Liang; Rest, Joshua S. & Davis, Charles C. (2014), "Coalescent versus concatenation methods and the placement of Amborella as sister to water lilies", Systematic Biology, 63 (6): 919–932, doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu055, PMID 25077515, retrieved 2015-09-13
  4. Qiu, Y.-L.; Lee, J.; Bernasconi-Quadroni, F.; Soltis, D.E.; Soltis, P.S.; Zanis, M.; Zimmer, E.A.; Chen, Z.; Savolainen, V.; Chase, M.W. (1999). "The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes". Nature. 402 (6760): 404–407. doi:10.1038/46536.
  5. Soltis, D. E.; Soltis, P. S. (2004), "Amborella not a "basal angiosperm"? Not so fast", American Journal of Botany, 91 (6): 997–1001, doi:10.3732/ajb.91.6.997, PMID 21653455
  6. Moore, M.J.; Bell, C.D.; Soltis, P.S.; Soltis, D.E. (2007). "Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (49): 19363–19368. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708072104.
  7. Soltis, D.E.; Smith, S.A.; Cellinese, N.; Wurdack, K.J.; Tank, D.C.; Brockington, S.F.; Refulio-Rodriguez, N.F.; Walker, J.B.; Moore, M.J.; Carlsward, B.S.; Bell, C.D.; Latvis, M.; Crawley, S.; Black, C.; Diouf, D.; Xi, Z.; Rushworth, C.A.; Gitzendanner, M.A.; Sytsma, K.J.; Qiu, Y.-L.; Hilu, K.W.; Davis, C.C.; Sanderson, M.J.; Beaman, R.S.; Olmstead, R.G.; Judd, W.S.; Donoghue, M.J.; Soltis, P.S. (2011). "Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa". American Journal of Botany. 98 (4): 704–730. doi:10.3732/ajb.1000404.
  8. Li, H.-T.; Yi, T.-S.; Gao, L.-M.; Ma, P.-F.; Zhang, T.; Yang, J.-B.; Gitzendanner, M.A.; Fritsch, P.W.; Cai, J.; Luo, Y.; Wang, H.; van der Bank, M.; Zhang, S.-D.; Wang, Q.-F.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.-R.; Fu, C.-N.; Yang, J.; Hollingsworth, P.M.; Chase, M.W.; Soltis, D.E.; Soltis, P.S.; Li, D.-Z. (2019). "Origin of angiosperms and the puzzle of the Jurassic gap". Nature Plants. 5 (5): 461–470. doi:10.1038/s41477-019-0421-0.
  9. Ramírez-Barahona, S.; Sauquet, H.; Magallón, S. (2020). "The delayed and geographically heterogeneous diversification of flowering plant families". Nature Ecology & Evolution. doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1241-3.
  10. Rudolphe Spichiger & Vincent Savolainen. 1997. Present state of Angiospermae phylogeny. Candollea 52: 435-455 (text Archived March 12, 2007, at the Wayback Machine)
  11. Leitch, I. J., M. W. Chase, and M. D. Bennett. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Annals of Botany 82 (Suppl. A): 85-94.
  12. Jaramillo, M. Alejandra; Manos, PS (2001), "Phylogeny and Patterns of Floral Diversity in the Genus Piper (Piperaceae)", American Journal of Botany, Botanical Society of America, 88 (4): 706–16, doi:10.2307/2657072, JSTOR 2657072, PMID 11302858
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.