2016 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy – Doubles
Marius Copil and Adrian Ungur were the defending champions, but lost in the first round to Chris Guccione and André Sá.
Florin Mergea and Horia Tecău won the title, defeating Guccione and Sá in the final, 7–5, 6–4.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2016 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 7–5, 6–4 |
Seeds
Florin Mergea / Horia Tecău (Champions) Eric Butorac / Scott Lipsky (Quarterfinals) Guillermo Durán / Máximo González (First round) Jonathan Erlich / Colin Fleming (Semifinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 63 | 65 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | w/o | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [8] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 1 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | [6] | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 77 | 67 | [6] | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 6 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 63 | 79 | [10] | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 6 | [18] | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [16] | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: ++remind "07:00 Wednesday" ATTAIN in-ear earphones
gollark: - move some design stuff into analysis (present tense only?)- put algorithms into design somehow- annotate code & reference design/objectives somehow- redo testing, evaluation somewhat; individually show each test, probably video, and show more edge cases
gollark: ++remind 20h http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312680465?ie=UTF8&tag=bldgblog-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=0312680465
gollark: ++remind 11h pete
gollark: ++remind 12h BEE you, STEP
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.