2016 BB&T Atlanta Open – Doubles
Bob and Mike Bryan were the defending champions, but chose not to participate this year.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2016 BB&T Atlanta Open | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 7–6(7–2), 6–4 |
Andrés Molteni and Horacio Zeballos won the title, defeating Johan Brunström and Andreas Siljeström in the final, 7–6(7–2), 6–4.
Seeds
Ivan Dodig / Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi (First round) Robert Lindstedt / Mate Pavić (First round) Eric Butorac / Sam Groth (Withdrew) Jonathan Erlich / Mariusz Fyrstenberg (First round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 64 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Alt | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [4] | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 66 | 6 | [11] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 79 | [6] | ![]() ![]() | 78 | 4 | [9] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 67 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 62 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 0 | ![]() ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | ![]() ![]() | w/o | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 65 | ![]() ![]() | 66 | 6 | [7] | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 78 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 78 | 4 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
Alt | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 66 | [8] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 |
gollark: Intel's 7nm is said to be (meant to be) similar to other companies' 5nm, at least.
gollark: They have 10nm Ice Lake mobile CPUs, at least.
gollark: They still haven't. So the best thing *shipping* is Ice Lake, which had better IPC but is also on their not-very-good 10nm process and has bad clocks, making it roughly as good as 14nm ones with worse architectures.
gollark: They added more cores, but Intel don't really have much better architectures. Unless they released Tiger Lake. I should check.
gollark: Sandy Bridge was 2011, and Intel is widely regarded as having not really done much since then until pretty recently.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.