1987 Italian referendums

Five nationwide popular referendums were held in Italy on 8 November 1987, with three questions about nuclear energy after the Chernobyl disaster, and two questions about justice. Voting day had been postponed of six months, according to the Italian Constitution, because of the snap election of spring.

Turnout was quite high, with a 65% of the electors participating to the referendum. For the first time since the adoption of the Constitution in 1948, a referendum was approved by the citizens.

Nuclear power referendums

The nuclear power referendums concerned three issues:

  • abolishing the statutes by which the Inter-ministries Committee for the Economical Programming (CIPE) could decide about the locations for nuclear plants, when the Regions did not so within the time stipulated by Law 393;
  • abolishing rewards for municipalities in whose territories nuclear or coal plants were to be built;
  • abolishing the statutes allowing ENEL to take part in international agreements to build and manage nuclear plants.

Some commenters find that the questions were actually too technical for non-experts and were used to obtain popular consent after Chernobyl disaster in 1986.[1] [2]

In each referendum "Yes" won. Subsequently, in 1988 the Italian government commenced to shut down the existing plants. This led to the termination of work on the near-complete Montalto di Castro Nuclear Power Station, and the early closure of Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Plant and Caorso NPP, both of which closed in 1990. Italy's other nuclear power plants had already closed prior to the decision, Latina NPP in December 1987.

Location for nuclear plants
Results of the referendum by province. Blue indicates a major in favour; red indicates a majority against.

This referendum asked to abolish the power of the State to oblige the local administrations to accept new nuclear plants in their territory. Italian voters had to say yes if they wanted to support local administrations, or no if they wanted to maintain statal supremacy about this theme. The referendum had a turnout of 65.1%.

Choice Votes %
For20,984,11080.6
Against5,059,81919.4
Invalid/blank votes3,818,447–
Total29,862,376100
Registered voters/turnout45,870,93165.1
Source: Minister of the Interior

Rewards for nuclear plants
Results of the referendum by province. Blue indicates a major in favour; red indicates a majority against.

This referendum asked to abolish rewards for local administrations which accepted nuclear, and coal, plants in their territory. Italian voters had to say yes if they wanted to eliminate these payments, or no if they wanted to maintain them. The referendum had a turnout of 65.1%.

Choice Votes %
For20,618,62479.7
Against5,247,88720.3
Invalid/blank votes4,005,059–
Total29,871,570100
Registered voters/turnout45,870,93165.1
Source: Minister of the Interior

ENEL nuclear plants abroad
Results of the referendum by province. Blue indicates a major in favour; red indicates a majority against.

This referendum asked to abolish the authorization for ENEL to build nuclear power plants outside Italy. Italian voters had to say yes if they wanted to forbid any worldwide nuclear engagement of Italy, or no if they wanted to continue an Italian nuclear research abroad. The referendum had a turnout of 65.1%.

Choice Votes %
For18,795,85271.9
Against7,361,66628.1
Invalid/blank votes3,698,086–
Total29,855,604100
Registered voters/turnout45,870,93165.1
Source: Minister of the Interior

Justice referendums

The justice referendums concerned two issues:

  • abolishing the law excluding any type of civil responsibility of judges in event of judicial errors;
  • abolishing the special parliamentary board of inquiry which excluded any investigation over ministers by ordinary courts.

Debate about justice was strong in Italy during the 1980s, especially after the case of the unjust arrest of popular TV host and anchorman Enzo Tortora, based only on false accusations by some pentito mafiosi.

The referendums were called by the Radical Party to abolish privileges that nobody had abolished despite they were in opposition to the text of the Italian Constitution which affirms equality between any citizen. In facts, a sole incumbent minister had been condemned in all republican history: Mario Tanassi for the Lockheed bribery scandals in 1977.[3] The referendum found support by the Italian Socialist Party, which wanted to underline its reformist agenda, and by the Italian Liberal Party.

In each referendum "Yes" won. However, if ministers were definitely subjected to ordinary courts, the Christian Democracy and the Italian Communist Party later approved a law strongly limiting the civil responsibility for judges.

Judges' civil responsibility
Results of the referendum by province. Blue indicates a major in favour; red indicates a majority against.

This referendum asked to abolish the law excluding any responsibility for judicial errors. Italian voters had to say yes if they wanted to abolish judges' exclusion from civil responsibility, or no if they wanted to maintain it. The referendum had a turnout of 65.1%.

Choice Votes %
For20,770,33480.2
Against5,126,02119.8
Invalid/blank votes3,969,894–
Total29,866,249100
Registered voters/turnout45,870,93165.1
Source: Minister of the Interior

Ministers' board of inquiry
Results of the referendum by province. Blue indicates a major in favour; red indicates a majority against.

This referendum asked to abolish the law excluding ministers from ordinary prosecution. Italian voters had to say yes if they wanted to abolish the parliamentary board which substituted ordinary court in ministerial accusations, or no if they wanted to maintain it. The referendum had a turnout of 65.1%.

Choice Votes %
For22,117,63485.0
Against3,890,11115.0
Invalid/blank votes3,854,925–
Total29,862,670100
Registered voters/turnout45,870,93165.1
Source: Minister of the Interior
gollark: Possibly different code for each, but same issue.
gollark: I think they were the same underlying issue.
gollark: Er, I think that's the wireworm one.
gollark: If I recall correctly, I actually just figured out a small bit of it by looking at string constants and a bit of structure, and inferred the rest.
gollark: And maybe a weird tree evaluator.

See also

References
  1. Fornaciari, P. (1997). Il petrolio, l'atomo e il metano. Edizioni 21mo secolo.
  2. Nebbia, Giancarlo (2007). Nucleare: il frutto proibito. Milan: Bompiani. ISBN 978-88-452-5954-8.
  3. La Repubblica (it.)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.