1945 Canadian federal election

The 1945 Canadian federal election was the 20th general election in Canadian history. It was held June 11, 1945 to elect members of the House of Commons of Canada of the 20th Parliament of Canada. Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King's Liberal government was re-elected to its third consecutive government, although this time with a minority government as the Liberals fell five seats short of a majority.

1945 Canadian federal election

June 11, 1945

245 seats in the House of Commons
123 seats needed for a majority
Turnout75.3%[1] (5.4pp)
  First party Second party
 
Leader W. L. Mackenzie King John Bracken
Party Liberal Progressive Conservative
Leader since August 7, 1919 December 11, 1942
Leader's seat Prince Albert (lost re-election) Neepawa
Last election 177 39
Seats won 118 67
Seat change 59 27
Popular vote 2,086,545 1,448,744
Percentage 39.78% 27.62%
Swing 11.54pp 2.79pp

  Third party Fourth party
 
Leader Major James Coldwell Solon Earl Low
Party Co-operative Commonwealth Social Credit
Leader since March 22, 1942 April 6, 1944
Leader's seat Rosetown—Biggar Peace River
Last election 8 10
Seats won 28 13
Seat change 20 3
Popular vote 815,720 212,220
Percentage 15.55% 4.05%
Swing 7.31pp 1.46pp


Prime Minister before election

William Lyon Mackenzie King
Liberal

Prime Minister after election

William Lyon Mackenzie King
Liberal

Although the election officially resulted in a minority government, the election of eight "Independent Liberal" MPs, most of whom did not run as official Liberals because of their opposition to conscription (see Conscription Crisis of 1944), gave the King government an effective working majority in parliament. Most of the Independent Liberal MPs joined (or re-joined) the Liberal caucus following World War II when the conscription issue became moot. As King was defeated in his own riding of Prince Albert, fellow Liberal William MacDiarmid, who was re-elected in the safe seat of Glengarry, resigned so that a by-election could be held, which was subsequently won by King.

The federal election was the first since the victory of the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation in the Saskatchewan provincial election, and many predicted a major breakthrough for the CCF nationally. A Gallup poll from September 1943 showed the CCF with a one-point lead over both the Liberals and Conservatives. The party was expected to win 70 to 100 seats, possibly even enough to form a minority government. Despite the expectations, the party only won 28 seats.

1945 was also the first test of the newly named Progressive Conservatives. The Conservative Party had changed its name in 1942 when former Progressive Party Premier of Manitoba John Bracken became its leader. The party improved its standing in terms of number of seats compared to the old Conservative Party, but also recorded a reduced share of the popular vote (indeed, the lowest in any election prior to 1993) and fell far short of challenging Liberal hegemony. Operation Downfall, the invasion of Japan, was scheduled for late 1945-early 1946. Bracken had promised conscription for the invasion of Japan whereas King had promised to commit one division of volunteers to the planned invasion of Japan.[2] Based on the way that the Japanese had fought the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa it was widely expected that the invasion of the Japanese home islands would be a bloody campaign, and Bracken's promise of conscription for the planned invasion of Japan did much to turn voters against his party.[3]

A key issue in this election seems to have been electing a stable government. The Liberals urged voters to "Return the Mackenzie King Government", and argued that only the Liberal Party had a "preponderance of members in all nine provinces". Mackenzie King threatened to call a new election if he was not given a majority: "We would have confusion to deal with at a time when the world will be in a very disturbed situation. The war in Europe is over, but unrest in the east is not over."

The Progressive Conservatives tried to capitalize on the massive mid-campaign victory by the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party in the 1945 Ontario provincial election. PC campaign ads exhorted voters to rally behind their party: "Ontario shows! Only Bracken can win!", and suggesting that it would be impossible to form a majority government in the country without a plurality of seats in Ontario, which only the Tories could win. In the event, the Liberals fell just short of a majority even though they won only 34 seats in Ontario to the PCs' 48 seats. Eight "Independent Liberal" MPs could be expected to support the government.

Social welfare programs were also an issue in the campaign. Another Liberal slogan encouraged voters to "Build a New Social Order" by endorsing the Liberal platform, which included

  • $750 million to provide land, jobs and business support for veterans;
  • $400 million of public spending to build housing;
  • $250 million for family allowances;
  • establishing an Industrial development Bank;
  • loans to farmers, floor prices for agricultural products;
  • tax reductions.

Campaigning under the slogan, "Work, Security, and Freedom for All -- with the CCF", the CCF promised to retain war-time taxes on high incomes and excess profits in order to fund social services, and to abolish the Senate of Canada. The CCF fought hard to prevent the support of labour from going to the Labor-Progressive Party (i.e., the Communist Party of Canada).

The LPP, for its part, pointed out that the CCF's refusal to enter into an electoral pact with the LPP had cost the CCF 100,000 votes in the Ontario election, and had given victory to the Ontario PCs. It urged voters to "Make Labour a Partner in Government."

The Social Credit Party of Canada tried, with modest success, to capitalize on the positive image of the Alberta Socred government of William Aberhart, asking voters, "Good Government in Alberta -- Why Not at Ottawa?". Referring to social credit monetary theories, the party encouraged voters to "Vote for the National Dividend".

The Canadian parliament after the 1945 election

National results

118 66 28 13 20
Liberal PC CCF SC O
Party Party leader # of
candidates
Seats Popular vote
1940 Elected % Change # % pp Change
  Liberal W. L. Mackenzie King 236 177 118 -33.9% 2,086,545 39.78% -11.54
  Progressive Conservative1 John Bracken 203 39 66 +66.7% 1,448,744 27.62% -2.79
     Co-operative Commonwealth M. J. Coldwell 205 8 28 +250% 815,720 15.55% +7.31
Social Credit2 Solon Earl Low 93 10 13 +30.0% 212,220 4.05% +1.46
  Independent Liberal 20 2 8 +300% 93,791 1.79% -1.40
  Independent 64 1 6 +500% 256,381 4.89% +3.65
Bloc populaire Maxime Raymond 35 * 2 * 172,765 3.29% *
Labor–Progressive3 Tim Buck 68 - 1   111,892 2.13% +1.94
  Independent PC 8 * 1 * 14,541 0.28% *
  Independent CCF4 2 * 1 * 6,402 0.12% *
Liberal–Progressive   1 3 1 -66.7% 6,147 0.12% -0.48
  National Government5   1   -   4,872 0.09%  
  Trades Union   1 * - * 4,679 0.09% *
  Farmer-Labour   2 - - - 3,620 0.07% -0.11
  Independent Conservative 1 - - -100% 2,653 0.05% -0.18
  Democratic W.R.N. Smith 5 * - * 2,603 0.05% *
     Union of Electors   1 * - * 596 0.01% *
  Socialist Labour   2 * - * 459 0.01% *
Labour   1 - - - 423 0.01% -0.07
  Liberal-Labour   1 * - * 345 0.01% *
  Independent Labour 1 * - * 241 x *
  Unknown 1 - - - 70 x x
Total 952 245 245 - 5,245,709 100%  
Sources: http://www.elections.ca -- History of Federal Ridings since 1867

Notes:

* The party did not nominate candidates in the previous election.

x - less than 0.005% of the popular vote.

1 1945 Progressive Conservative vote compared to 1940 National Government + Conservative vote.

2 1945 Social Credit vote compared to 1940 New Democracy + Social Credit vote.

3 1945 Labor-Progressive vote compared to 1940 Communist vote.

4 The successful "Independent CCF" candidate ran as a People's Co-operative Commonwealth Federation candidate.

5 One Progressive Conservative candidate ran under the "National Government" label that the party had used in the 1940 election.

Vote and seat summaries

Popular vote
Liberal
39.78%
PC
27.62%
CCF
15.55%
Social Credit
4.05%
Others
13.00%
Seat totals
Liberal
48.16%
PC
26.94%
CCF
11.43%
Social Credit
5.31%
Others
8.16%

Results by province

Party name BC AB SK MB ON QC NB NS PE YK Total
  Liberal Seats: 5 2 2 9 34 47 7 9 3   118
  Popular Vote: 27.5 21.8 33.0 32.7 40.8 46.5 50.0 45.7 48.4   39.8
  Progressive Conservative Seats: 5 2 1 2 48 1 3 2 1 1 66
  Vote: 30.0 18.7 18.8 24.9 41.4 9.7 38.3 36.8 47.4 40.0 27.6
     Co-operative Commonwealth Seats: 4 - 18 5 - - - 1 - - 28
     Vote: 29.4 18.4 44.4 31.6 14.3 2.4 7.4 16.7 4.2 27.5 15.6
  Social Credit Seats: - 13 - - - -         13
  Vote: 2.3 36.6 3.0 3.2 0.2 4.4         4.0
  Independent Liberal Seats: 1         7 -       8
  Vote: 1.7         5.9 1.1       1.8
  Independent Seats:       - - 6 - -     6
  Vote:       0.8 0.4 16.9 3.2 0.2     4.9
  Bloc populaire Seats:         - 2         2
  Vote:         0.3 11.9         3.3
  Labor–Progressive Seats: - - - - - 1   -   - 1
  Vote: 5.9 4.5 0.8 5.0 2.0 1.0   0.6   32.4 2.1
  Independent PC Seats:         - 1         1
  Vote:         xx 1.0         0.3
  Independent CCF Seats: 1         -         1
  Vote: 1.4         xx         0.1
  Liberal-Progressive Seats:       1             1
  Vote:       1.9             0.1
Total Seats 16 17 21 17 82 65 10 12 4 1 245
Parties that won no seats:
  National Government Vote:         0.3           0.1
  Trades Union Vote: 1.1                   0.1
  Farmer-Labour Vote:         0.2           0.1
  Independent Conservative Vote:           0.2         0.1
  Democratic Vote: 0.6                   xx
     Union of Electors Vote:           xx         xx
  Socialist Labour Vote: 0.1                   xx
Labour Vote:           xx         xx
  Liberal-Labour Vote:           xx         xx
  Independent Labour Vote:         0.1           xx
  Unknown Vote:           xx         xx

xx - less than 0.05% of the popular vote.

Further reading

  • Argyle, Ray. Turning Points: The Campaigns That Changed Canada - 2011 and Before (2011) excerpt and text search ch 9
gollark: Bots can do any Markdown stuff users can, can't they?
gollark: I'd hope that if it does implode they provide reasonable warning, but that never does seem to happen.
gollark: Also that it's free, convenient and has voice chat and stuff.
gollark: The "killer feature" is probably just that, well, there are tons of communities here and not elsewhere.
gollark: It seems like Discord just use it to push content restrictions and stuff. Also, their (mandatory for "community" servers) NSFW filter is apparently not good and has high false positive rates.

See also

References

  1. "Voter Turnout at Federal Elections and Referendums". Elections Canada. Retrieved 10 March 2019.
  2. Morton, Desmond A Military History of Canada, Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1999 page 223-224.
  3. Morton, Desmond A Military History of Canada, Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1999 page 223-224.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.