Poser criteria

Poser criteria are diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS). They replaced the older Schumacher criteria,[1] and now they are considered obsolete as McDonald criteria have superseded them. Nevertheless, some of the concepts introduced have remained in MS research, like CDMS (clinical definite MS), and newer criteria are often calibrated against them.[2]

Poser criteria
Purposediagnosis criteria for MS

The article that introduced them also defined the concepts of attack, historical information, clinical evidence, paraclinical evidence, lesion typical of MS, remission, separate lesions and laboratory support, which are necessary to apply the criteria.

The criteria considers MS as the presence of demyelinating lesions disseminated in time and space, and they are oriented specially to prove the dissemination. Based on this, the authors defined a set of rules that can yield five conclusions:[3] CDMS, LSDMS, CPMS, LSPMS or noMS. Poser diagnosis of CDMS is known to have a sensitivity of 87% respect postmortem autopsy examination[4]

Definitions

Poser et al. define several concepts. The most important for diagnosis are:

  • Attack: Occurrence of a symptom of neurological dysfunction for more than 24 hours
  • Clinical evidence: Neurological dysfunction demonstrable by neurological examination
  • Paraclinical evidence: Demonstration by any test of the existence of a non-clinical lesion in the CNS

Diagnosis conclusions

The criteria can yield five conclusions:

  1. CDMS – Clinically definite MS. Needs two attacks and some clinical or paraclinical evidences
  2. LSDMS – Laboratory supported definite MS, showing oligoclonal bands and clinical or paraclinical evidences
  3. CPMS – Clinically probable MS, with less restrict combinations.
  4. LSPMS – Laboratory supported probable MS. Only two attacks is enough to enter this category
  5. No MS – There is no clinical evidence of having MS.

Summary of requirements

Any of the five conclusions have subpossibilities. Here a table is shown with each one of them:

Diagnosis conclusion Clinical Presentation Additional Data Needed
CDMS * Two or more attacks (relapses) Two clinical evidence
One clinical and one paraclinical evidence
LSDMS * At least one attack and oligoclonal bands Two attacks and one evidence (clinical or paraclinical)
One attack and two clinical evidences
One attack, one clinical and one paraclinical evidences
CPMS * At least one attack Two attacks and one clinical evidence
One attack and two clinical evidences
One attack, one clinical and one paraclinical evidences
LSPMS * Two attacks No more evidence is required

If none of these requirements is accomplished, the diagnosis is "No MS", meaning that there is not enough clinical evidence to support a clinical diagnosis of MS.

Sensitivity and specificity

Poser diagnosis of CDMS was initially reported to have a sensitivity of 87% respect postmortem autopsy examination.[5] Poser criteria were published in 1983 and their sensitivity increased with time. For example, in 1988 a 94% specificity vs. postmortem analysis was reported [6]

Anyway, in initial cases, the sensitivity was low respect pathologically defined MS because around 25% of MS cases are silent MS cases.[7]

Two pathologically disseminated inflammatory demyelinating lesions should be considered MS even if they are silent. Therefore, Poser criteria should be considered as deprecated.

Extension of the concepts

As more knowledge about the underlying pathology of MS has been gathered, the concepts of subclinical, preclinical and CIS have been used together with the Poser original classification.

The first manifestation of MS is the so-called clinically isolated syndrome, or CIS, which is the first isolated attack. The Poser diagnosis criteria for MS does not allow doctors normally to give an MS diagnosis until a second attack takes place. Therefore, the concept of "clinical MS", for a MS that can be diagnosed is sometimes too strong because until MS diagnosis has been established, nobody can tell whether the disease dealing with is MS.

Cases of MS before the CIS are sometimes found during other neurological inspections and are referred to as "subclinical MS".[8] "Preclinical MS" refers to cases after the CIS but before the confirming second attack.[9] After the second confirming attack the situation is referred to as CDMS (clinically defined multiple sclerosis).[10]

gollark: ++remind 23y sabotage <@341618941317349376> maths career
gollark: ShutdownOS is a third party project utilising SPUDNET.
gollark: It's a secureish message forwarding and report logging server for PotatOS and other projects like ShutdownOS and Heavdrones™.
gollark: Essentially.
gollark: It would take effort to release and I would have to ensure it is scrubbed of any keys or whatever.

References
  1. Schumacher GA, Beebe G, Kibler RF, Kurland LT, Kurtzke JF, McDowell F, Nagler B, Sibley WA, Tourtellotte WW, Willmon TL (March 1965). "Problems of Experimental Trials of Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: Report by the Panel on the Evaluation of Experimental Trials of Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis". Ann N Y Acad Sci. 122 (1): 552–568. Bibcode:1965NYASA.122..552S. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb20235.x. PMID 14313512.
  2. Christopher J. Lisanti, Patrick Asbach, and William G. Bradley, Jr. The Ependymal "Dot-Dash" Sign: An MR Imaging Finding of Early Multiple Sclerosis, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2033–2036, September 2005
  3. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al. (March 1983). "New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols" (PDF). Annals of Neurology. 13 (3): 227–31. doi:10.1002/ana.410130302. PMID 6847134. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-03-24. Retrieved 2009-11-05.
  4. Izquierdo G, Hauw J-J, Lyon-Caen O; et al. (1985). "Value of multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria: 70 Autopsy-confirmed cases". Arch Neurol. 42: 848–850. doi:10.1001/archneur.1985.04060080026010.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. Izquierdo G, Hauw J-J, Lyon-Caen O; et al. (1985). "Value of multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria: 70 Autopsy-confirmed cases". Arch Neurol. 42: 848–850. doi:10.1001/archneur.1985.04060080026010.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. Engell T (July 1988). "A clinico-pathoanatomical study of multiple sclerosis diagnosis". Acta Neurol. Scand. 78: 39–44. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1988.tb03616.x. PMID 3176880.
  7. Engell T (May 1989). "A clinical patho-anatomical study of clinically silent multiple sclerosis". Acta Neurol Scand. 79 (5): 428–30. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1989.tb03811.x. PMID 2741673.
  8. Hakiki B, Goretti B, Portaccio E, Zipoli V, Amato MP (2008). "Subclinical MS: follow-up of four cases". European Journal of Neurology. 15 (8): 858–61. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02155.x. PMID 18507677.
  9. Lebrun C, Bensa C, Debouverie M, et al. (2008). "Unexpected multiple sclerosis: follow-up of 30 patients with magnetic resonance imaging and clinical conversion profile". J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 79 (2): 195–198. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.108274. PMID 18202208.
  10. Frisullo G, Nociti V, Iorio R, et al. (Dec 2008). "The persistency of high levels of pSTAT3 expression in circulating CD4+ T cells from CIS patients favors the early conversion to clinically defined multiple sclerosis". J. Neuroimmunol. 205 (1–2): 126–134. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.09.003. PMID 18926576.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.